Related
I'm running Jelly Bean on my Verizon GN with the kernel that came with it. Is there a better one I should be using?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I was using Fanco 216 For a while and it ran great I just flashed trinity Alpha 28 and i have heard good things about it, try one of those
Stock? Havn't found a kernel yet which doesn't lag for me atleast =] i dont mean extreme lag just little stutters that i didn't noticed when using stock
I've been happy with the GlaDos 2.0RC on JB so far..
I'm happy with the stock one for now.
trinity kernel, the way google wanted jellybean to be ran. here, experimental tab http://www.derkernel.com/jbtuna.php#
Franco 216 is easily the best
Stock. Had issues with franco.
Loki047 said:
Stock. Had issues with franco.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can I get the stock version. I'm running the sprint version are you jelling rc1
sent from my SAMSUNG GALAXY NEXUS with ANDROID 4.1 JELLY BEAN
Stock. I tried some and they were horrible. Franko was always nice but on jb it made it ten times slower, i have never ever experienced so much lag before. Stock is fast, does not lag, gets nice battery consumption so why would you even consider tinkering around.
Stock. its the smoothest for me so far
Can anybody give Me a link for the stock kernel thanks in advance
sent from my SAMSUNG GALAXY NEXUS with ANDROID 4.1 JELLY BEAN
Just like any 'what kernel should I use with _____' thread, answers will never be objective and will be based on individual results which will not necessarily be reproducible on every handset. There are already multiple threads asking what the best kernel is for 4.1.
Also:
1. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean has not been released. A developer preview does not count.
2. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean sources have not been released
edgargurrola01 said:
Can anybody give Me a link for the stock kernel thanks in advance
sent from my SAMSUNG GALAXY NEXUS with ANDROID 4.1 JELLY BEAN
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw a link to the stock kernel in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738018. It should work with any galaxy nexus variant, but as always, flash at your own risk and nandroid first.
JaiaV said:
Just like any 'what kernel should I use with _____' thread, answers will never be objective and will be based on individual results which will not necessarily be reproducible on every handset. There are already multiple threads asking what the best kernel is for 4.1.
Also:
1. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean has not been released. A developer preview does not count.
2. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean sources have not been released
3. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean kernel sources have not been released. Kernel mods are done on decompiled software which is never as reliable as modifying source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
think you're wrong on 3. google did release source for 4.1 kernel
ceejay83 said:
think you're wrong on 3. google did release source for 4.1 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edit: correct. 4.1 kernel source was released. I missed it.
been running Lean kernel, and its my first "non-stock" kernel since flashing jellybean last week. gotta say I love it so far. great battery life, and just as smooth as stock as far as my use goes. I got 4 1/2 hrs of screen on time tody with it. on WiFi all day, but still happy
dschoenike
molesarecoming said:
Stock. I tried some and they were horrible. Franko was always nice but on jb it made it ten times slower, i have never ever experienced so much lag before. Stock is fast, does not lag, gets nice battery consumption so why would you even consider tinkering around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My feelings exactly... I have always been a Franko kernel user previously, but I found his JB kernel to be very choppy. I then went and reflashed the ROM(didn't know where to get the actual stock kernel from) so I could go back to the stock kernel and I am happy again! lol
But it really is a personal choice which depends a lot on what you individually want to do with your phone.
JaiaV said:
Just like any 'what kernel should I use with _____' thread, answers will never be objective and will be based on individual results which will not necessarily be reproducible on every handset. There are already multiple threads asking what the best kernel is for 4.1.
Also:
1. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean has not been released. A developer preview does not count.
2. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean sources have not been released
3. Android 4.1 Jelly Bean kernel sources have not been released. Kernel mods are done on decompiled software which is never as reliable as modifying source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JaiaV said:
Where?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel source was released the same day that the google io attendies received JellyBean. since google released it, they legally have to provide kernel source according to the GPL. our kernel devs here all follow GPL as well, thats one of the requirements of xda to allow them to post their custom kernels. btw, source is where it always is. please dont insult our wonderful kernel developers.
From: "Jean-Baptiste Queru" <[email protected]>
Date: Jun 27, 2012 4:29 PM
Subject: [android-building] GPL components for the Jelly Bean preview
To: <[email protected]>
As usual, Android 4.1 ("Jelly Bean") contains a few components
licensed under the GPL or similar licenses. For the preview that was
just announced at Google I/O, the source code of those components is
available in AOSP.
The JFN53F platform components are tagged android-4.1_pre1 in their
respective projects. That's the version that Nexus 7 has in the box.
The JRN84D platform components are tagged android-4.1_pre2 in their
resepctive projects. That's the automatic update for both Nexus 7 and
Galaxy Nexus.
The SDK platform components are tagged android-4.1-sdk_pre1 in their
resepctive projects.
They are available with full source history. They are fully merged
into the master branch (except webkit). They all build on top of the
current AOSP master.
The Nexus 7 kernels are in the kernel/tegra project, under SHA-1
8dd2eab (in the box) and 55edff4 (the update). The Galaxy Nexus kernel
is in the kernel/omap project, under SHA-1 e8de0e2. They all have full
source history.
JBQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
simms22 said:
kernel source was released the same day that the google io attendies received JellyBean. since google released it, they legally have to provide kernel source according to the GPL. our kernel devs here all follow GPL as well, thats one of the requirements of xda to allow them to post their custom kernels. btw, source is where it always is. please dont insult our wonderful kernel developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah...sorry for the incorrect info. I've been checking since I was corrected, and my git was broken and not pulling the source for 4.1.
Thanks.
Hi, this is a question but because it isn't about the phone in the current form i thought it was better to put it here.
Rumours say the One X will not go past 4.2, but is it likely developers would be able to put it on? I know much older phones are able to get 4.1, 4.2 which only went up to 2 with manufacturers.
One X doesn't have S-OFF yet. And id expect you may need a later HBOOT for KLP? If it isn't released on the One X you wouldn't get that HBOOT. But for a developer to develop a later HBOOT it would need S-OFF right? If not then it is likely it will get i assume
It is 99% certain that devs will bring Android KLP for us.
It is possible to run JB4.2 on ICS hboot so I'd assume it's possible to run KLP on JB hboot as well.
Cheers for the reply Sounds like good news. Hope we get a sense version for KLP too.
I'm not sure if you're talking about the AOSP/CM/PA/AOKP KLP or Sense KLP, but either way, don't expect the One X to die soon take my old phone, the Xperia X8 for example. With limited source and limited devs, it managed to survive from Android 1.6 till Android 4.1.2 that's a device with a single core Qualcomm MSM7227 SoC with only 256 MB of RAM. I doubt the One X will die at 4.2.2, even if we don't receive it OFFICIALLY
i heard that the next update will be 4.3 and will be jellybean again
I meant Sense as i feel personally it has more features than ASOP/AKOP. And 4.3 hmmm. Been 4 for a while now, a 5 would be nice. Or if 4.3 had a few significant features. 4.2 wasn't very significant over 4.1 in all honesty.
RohinZaraki said:
I'm not sure if you're talking about the AOSP/CM/PA/AOKP KLP or Sense KLP, but either way, don't expect the One X to die soon take my old phone, the Xperia X8 for example. With limited source and limited devs, it managed to survive from Android 1.6 till Android 4.1.2 that's a device with a single core Qualcomm MSM7227 SoC with only 256 MB of RAM. I doubt the One X will die at 4.2.2, even if we don't receive it OFFICIALLY
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agreed!! :good:
RohinZaraki said:
I'm not sure if you're talking about the AOSP/CM/PA/AOKP KLP or Sense KLP, but either way, don't expect the One X to die soon take my old phone, the Xperia X8 for example. With limited source and limited devs, it managed to survive from Android 1.6 till Android 4.1.2 that's a device with a single core Qualcomm MSM7227 SoC with only 256 MB of RAM. I doubt the One X will die at 4.2.2, even if we don't receive it OFFICIALLY
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want it to die soon! I plan to keep my 11 month old one X for at least an year and a half more. Won't get a new phone before that. And it would kill me not to have the latest and the greatest on my beast.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
TToivanen said:
It is possible to run JB4.2 on ICS hboot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I'd like to know how, every single 4.2 rom requires JB HBOOT, and I'm stuck with ICS HBOOT (1.12).
Ambious said:
Really? I'd like to know how, every single 4.2 rom requires JB HBOOT, and I'm stuck with ICS HBOOT (1.12).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Back in the day when JB sources were unreleased, every aosp-based ROM (even 4.2.x ones) ran kernels based on HTC's ICS kernel source.
---> ICS kernels work fine on ICS hboot
All you have to do is find an old jb4.2 ROM which contains ICS based kernel or kindly ask a ROM dev to build one for you.
GL my friend
Sent from my IceCold One X
TToivanen said:
Yes. Back in the day when JB sources were unreleased, every aosp-based ROM (even 4.2.x ones) ran kernels based on HTC's ICS kernel source.
---> ICS kernels work fine on ICS hboot
All you have to do is find an old jb4.2 ROM which contains ICS based kernel or kindly ask a ROM dev to build one for you.
GL my friend
Sent from my IceCold One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But would that work? Could I run a newer JB4.2 rom with an older ICS kernel?
Ambious said:
But would that work? Could I run a newer JB4.2 rom with an older ICS kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure I've done it myself.
For example, you can download cm10.1 alpha 2 from this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1786696
It's clearly stated that older hboot is supported.
Sent from my IceCold One X
TToivanen said:
Sure I've done it myself.
For example, you can download cm10.1 alpha 2 from this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1786696
It's clearly stated that older hboot is supported.
Sent from my IceCold One X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except they removed it from the hosting site
Thanks for the tip anyway.
Too bad I can't use newer versions and just over-ride the kernel.
Ambious said:
Except they removed it from the hosting site
Thanks for the tip anyway.
Too bad I can't use newer versions and just over-ride the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if simply flashing a custom ICS kernel over a ROM would work... Please try.
Also, tbalden is a nice guy, I'm sure he'll reupload the a2 for you or even build it if you just ask politely.
Mattmanwrx is using the old kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2149747
Also any 4.1.2 aosp ROM should do the trick for example CM10, IceColdJelly 4.1.2, etc.
Sent from my IceCold One X
TToivanen said:
I don't know if simply flashing a custom ICS kernel over a ROM would work... Please try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was going to, but I'm too afraid to mess something up.
[quote[
Mattmanwrx is using the old kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2149747[/QUOTE]
Wow, not sure how I didn't know about this. Gonna use this instead of the current (out of date) CM10. Thanks
Unofficial-Official JellyBean for P930/935/936
Unofficial-Official JellyBean for P930/935/936 - N2 - with working WiFi. Just clean ROM like original from SU640.
Download: (Need minimum 630mb free size on System part )
http://dfiles.ru/files/w4gujg5ef
For information:
For JellyBean ROM for I-Project need 1Gb system size. So when you flash KDZ it will repart you eMMC.
I unpack KDZ from SU640, and repack System part.
Deleted all Operator Apps and Google Apps, remove SecurityCheck, adapt ROM for GSM, and now size of ROM ~ 630mb. And we can flash it via CWM without problem on old partition table and it working with old MODEM.
I ported new kernel 3.4 from LG F120S and SU640, adaptive it for P930.
My port Sphinx V4.1 - 4.1.2 JB for P930
Probably fix copability with different bootloaders;
Rework battery and charger drivers;
Translated to RUS/UKR
Need 646mb. free space on System part!
Download:
http://dfiles.ru/files/1er0nv65u
First patch for Sphinx ROM
Fix some bugs in sound driver;
Fix proximity sensor;
Some fixes for telephony.
Download: Global_Patch_1.zip
Second patch for Sphinx ROM
Fix random boots during sleep;
Added 2 new LG apps: PhotoAlbum widget + Photo wallpaper;
Restore EasySettings.
Download: Global_Patch_2.zip
Bugs:
Blue screen of death on Widows PC (try different mode connections); - turn-off "USB-debug"
Big thanks All authors who made Sphinx ROM!
Link available!
Awesome, awesome work. Can't wait to have official 4.1.2 on the P930!
miroslav_mm said:
Unofficial-Official JellyBean for P930/935/936
For JellyBean ROM for I-Project need 1Gb system size. So when you flash KDZ it will repart you eMMC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will this introduce any problems if switching between the already existing ICS, CMx ROMs other than needing the corresponding gapps lite from there on out?
I would be interested in your 3.4 kernel. Do you have the source on github?
I also be interested in his 3.4 kernel
tdmcode said:
I would be interested in your 3.4 kernel. Do you have the source on github?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tdmcode said:
I would be interested in your 3.4 kernel. Do you have the source on github?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will available on my Github later.
Who install ROM please install patch_1.zip
If you delete strings from build.prop
ro.build.target_operator=SKT
ro.build.target_country=KR
you will see new settings for GSM and it remove T Roaming Settings.
miroslav_mm said:
Will available on my Github later.
Who install ROM please install patch_1.zip
If you delete strings from build.prop
ro.build.target_operator=SKT
ro.build.target_country=KR
you will see new settings for GSM and it remove T Roaming Settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your work!
I have flashed this rom on my ATT P930，but Phone has been restarted and cant get into system.
so I restore to 20E.
Looking forward to your 3.4 kernel too!
navik said:
Thanks for your work!
Phone has been restarted and cant get into system.
so I restore to 20E.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you wipe your Phone via recovery? Its working without any problem.
miroslav_mm said:
Did you wipe your Phone via recovery? Its working without any problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah no problems here. But I did install through CWM and not ROM manager. Out of habit I install new ROMs through CWM due to issues I have had with installing new ROMs through ROM manager.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
miroslav_mm said:
Did you wipe your Phone via recovery? Its working without any problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure，I used recovery 5.82 and had wiped data ，wipe cache and wipe dalvik cache.
Thanks for reply and your work.
I will try again！
Sent from my LG-SU640 using xda premium
What are the advantages of the 3.4 kernel ? more compatible with JB 4.x.x ?
EDIT: Got the answer here for those interested: http://rootzwiki.com/topic/39958-what-is-the-value-of-the-linux-34-kernel/
Btw, great work.
just1nsama said:
What are the advantages of the 3.4 kernel ? more compatible with JB 4.x.x ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes of course. Full ION support, better capability with CAF, JB-camera, full support Adreno (KGSL), bla-bla-bla....
miroslav_mm said:
Yes of course. Full ION support, better capability with CAF, JB-camera, full support Adreno (KGSL), bla-bla-bla....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alight thanks ... i found more specifics here: http://rootzwiki.com/topic/39958-what-is-the-value-of-the-linux-34-kernel/
I see you created the repo on your github, but as of now it is empty, will you be adding the content in the near future ? Would really like to compile a PAC build with it and try it out
Thanks and keep up the good work :good:
Yeah that's all cool but the thing I am hoping to see is more stability. The 2.6.35 kernel was very stable. The 3.0.x kernel is not so stable.
tdmcode said:
Yeah that's all cool but the thing I am hoping to see is more stability. The 2.6.35 kernel was very stable. The 3.0.x kernel is not so stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont know about 2.6.35, but 3.0.x not stable because all using CM kernel for base. CM kernel base on CAF sources, not on LG original sources.
3.4 working very good for me. Battery life and performance on Stock 4.1 are great without any dirty tweaks and patches in kernel!
miroslav_mm said:
Dont know about 2.6.35, but 3.0.x not stable because all using CM kernel for base. CM kernel base on CAF sources, not on LG original sources.
3.4 working very good for me. Battery life and performance on Stock 4.1 are great without any dirty tweaks and patches in kernel!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM took the lu6200 ICS sources and added display stuff from caf.
The original lge ICS ota was unstable for all iproj devices.
I have a weak p930 that will be the judge of the new 3.4 kernel. It reboots about every 5 to 15 minutes under the ics kernel. I will try when I get sources... No sources, no install...
Can't wait to flash this once WiFi is working
I don't have unlimited data and use WiFi a lot.
Flashed this ROM. It looks very good except WIFI issue. Am now testing battery drain. Looking for WiFi fix.
I've been checking this thread every
Hour for a WiFi fix... I use this as a WiFi only device so the lackthereof is a killer right now for me... That being said if anyone has a lead on what's breaking it I would love to help find a fix for the problem. Really never thought we would see a jb release for our device from LG but I believe it will be a major stepping stone for future development of our P93x's. Once again I wanna thank miroslav and all the other great devs and tinkerers who bust their asses to make our phones into beasts, and I look forward to seeing what awesomeness will come with these recent leaks.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda app-developers app
Was reading about the new experimental Google 3.10 kernel, what would this mean for our device?
aromerblz said:
Was reading about the new experimental Google 3.10 kernel, what would this mean for our device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing we are on 3.1 kernel
Thant said:
Nothing we are on 3.1 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well upgrading the device is the best to get the latest.
But it makes no sense if you want to test a new experimental kernel when the OS will never support it (I mean newer than 3.1, because the hox will not get any big updates anymore)
Mr Hofs said:
But it makes no sense if you want to test a new experimental kernel when the OS will never support it (I mean newer than 3.1, because the hox will not get any big updates anymore)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I really ment getting a newer device since that's the case.
Ah like that. Yep....that means a new device
I all.
I'm looking for a kernel for my galaxy nexus and i've noticed that most (all?) the latest kernel threads (I'm looking for a currently mantained kernels) are stuck at version 3.0.101 while linux kernel is arrived, today, at 3.19.1.
Now I know that the "android branch" is different than the main one but however I guess there should be newer versions around, like 3.4 or, even better, 3.10.
So, why it's so hard to find a newer version?
Any 3.4/3.10 kernel suggestion?
Thanks a lot.
lorenx said:
I all.
I'm looking for a kernel for my galaxy nexus and i've noticed that most (all?) the latest kernel threads (I'm looking for a currently mantained kernels) are stuck at version 3.0.101 while linux kernel is arrived, today, at 3.19.1.
Now I know that the "android branch" is different than the main one but however I guess there should be newer versions around, like 3.4 or, even better, 3.10.
So, why it's so hard to find a newer version?
Any 3.4/3.10 kernel suggestion?
Thanks a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahaha... HA!
Funny... GTFO and read why Gnexus never will have 3.10 and MAYBE REALLY MAYBE we will have 3.4 (1% chance to get it)
piterdemon said:
Hahahahhahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahhahahahaha... HA!
Funny... GTFO and read why Gnexus never will have 3.10 and MAYBE REALLY MAYBE we will have 3.4 (1% chance to get it)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, but less is fine anyway.
however, it seems 3.0.101 is the newest we can have then...
lorenx said:
ok, but less is fine anyway.
however, it seems 3.0.101 is the newest we can have then...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry emotions was first [emoji14]
Yes 3.0.101 is latest for Gnex, bsmitty will focus his works on 3.4 when he will get Nexus6 (or he got it already, idk)
Its hard to develop 3.4 for Gnex because of missed drivers from Texas Instruments
piterdemon said:
Sorry emotions was first [emoji14]
Yes 3.0.101 is latest for Gnex, bsmitty will focus his works on 3.4 when he will get Nexus6 (or he got it already, idk)
Its hard to develop 3.4 for Gnex because of missed drivers from Texas Instruments
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. Thanks for the clarification.