Anyone else's phone run like garbage on 4.2.2? - Samsung Galaxy Nexus

I have no idea why but when 4.2.2-based ROMs came out, my phone started to run like garbage. Slowdowns, lag, memory leaks, you name it, it happened. And it seemed to have started with 4.2.2. I don't ever remember this being a problem with 4.1.2-based ROMs.
So I ask... has anyone else experienced these issues? Does your phone run like garbage on 4.2.2-based ROMs?

I've been thinking of going back to a 4.1.2-based ROM just to try and get back some of the speed that my phone used to have. There are times I want to throw this thing against the wall because lately trying to get it to do anything without seriously bad lag is like trying to pull teeth.

You people overreact to everything. If its so bad, and you knew it was going to be bad, then why in the world did y'all upgrade to 4.2.2?
Try UDKs ROM, works fine for me

I'm thinking that 4.2.2 may be too heavy for the hardware of the Galaxy Nexus. 4.1.2 never was this slow and laggy on this phone.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

trparky said:
I'm thinking that 4.2.2 may be too heavy for the hardware of the Galaxy Nexus. 4.1.2 never was this slow and laggy on this phone.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
considering my phone runs just fine 4.2.2 on stock rom, its prolly the rom you're running.

I think 4.2.2 runs great. Compare it to the original 4.0 ics firmware it blows it out of the water.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

akira02rex said:
I think 4.2.2 runs great. Compare it to the original 4.0 ics firmware it blows it out of the water.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does it not even lag after running it for a few days without reboot? That is the issue many people are seeing and 4.2.2 is smoother than ICS for the most part except the recents may sometimes lag worse on 4.2.2. The worse part of ICS was the unlock lag with auto brightness on.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

4.2.2 is running super smooth for me. I dont know what all these people having issues is all about. It all depends on what ROM you use, and also could be the recovery you use. If your using an old recovery, it may not be wiping stuff right before flashing. A lot of factors go into a phone running crappy. Dont blame it all on 4.2.2.

Zepius said:
considering my phone runs just fine 4.2.2 on stock rom, its prolly the rom you're running.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This issue only happens on custom roms because its an issue with stock though maybe less noticeable there.
But as far as the OPs comments, if you're annoyed by 4.2.2 so much then switch back to 4.1.2 if you like it better.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I got the OTA yesterday for my VZW GNex and it's running great. So far, it's a better experience than 4.1 for me. Battery life seems the same (in a good way) and the UI is acting smoother than before.

jsgraphicart said:
4.2.2 is running super smooth for me. I dont know what all these people having issues is all about. It all depends on what ROM you use, and also could be the recovery you use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. Try not to reboot your 4.2.2-based rom for 2-3 days and you'll see the real smoothness (Sometimes it take couple of hours sometimes couple of days to reproduce the issue). I've tested 6 roms so far including non-rooted, slimmed stock - Low fps scrolling issue appears on every single one, clean install and always updated twrp recovery.
I think android 4.2.2 is an interesting project and it works not that bad. However there are some annoying bugs there. I don't use WIFi tethering or BT and I know how to deal with scrolling lag so it doesn't bother me that much. I can patiently wait for fix but problems exist and full wipe will not solve them.

my only issue is the battery drain lol thats all

I've got a epic 4g touch and I'm running cm10.1 wild for the night 4.2.2 and it works perfectly! Way faster than before.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

I use WiFi tethering and Bluetooth on Rasbean/Trinity 4.2.2 and don't have any issues even after 2-3 days. Only issue I had initially was major lag in recents after a couple days. Rebooted and haven't had that problem since, even after several days uptime.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

There is already a thread about the lag problem on roms based on 4.2.2 update - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2178962 and I confirm the lag.after 2-3 days ui starts to lag.everything gets better if you flash ak kernel diamond ed plus download clean master app by ksmobile from play store and you open it/go to history and clean cache once a day.The second thing that i found is that if you change the wallpaper when the lag start it goes away.hope this helps.good luck! Also the problem was reported to google
Sent from my Shining Nexus using AK DIAMOND ED.

4.0 < 4.2 < 4.2.1 < 4.1 < 4.2.2 < 4.1.2.
4.1.2 has been the smoothest version of stock in all the time I've been using Android. If 4.2.2 seems that bad, try running Lagfix once.

I've been on cm 10.1 nightlies (4.2.2) for awhile now and no lags/slowdowns whatsoever. Aside from the SOD when I first tried it (fixed now), it has been just as smooth if not smoother than 4.1.2

Sv: Anyone else's phone run like garbage on 4.2.2?
biscuitownz said:
I've been on cm 10.1 nightlies (4.2.2) for awhile now and no lags/slowdowns whatsoever. Aside from the SOD when I first tried it (fixed now), it has been just as smooth if not smoother than 4.1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm10.1 is not bad indeed (I am running it now and I'm pretty much enjoying it) but 4.1.2 based roms like cna 3.8.0 or cm10 are by far smoother. If you want to see the difference in smoothness go to application drawer (widget tab) and swipe left or right. On every 4.2.2 based rom swiping there is more or less but still kinda choppy.... On two 4.1.2 roms I mentioned above it's almost perfect. Small thing.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

in my case it was franco kernel that caused the super bad performance.
the problem was coming from write performance which caused cpu overloading and locking down the device. this got worse after some time without reboot ~2days.
i did a clean install of sourcery rom with cmw (twrp seems to leave some stuff behind which will cause the lag again?) and so far my device is up for some time without any slowdowns.
maybe you once installed a kernel and use twrp which never got you a clean rom again? hope that helps some of you troubled ones.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

I'm running lean kernel and the latest AOKP.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Related

Stable Jellybean ROM

guys
i used to run ICS on a stock ROM and it was quite stable. However, after trying some ROM's, I'm facing different problems on different days - sometimes battery just dies overnight, it freezes, chrome takes forever to open up, etc
Can someone recommend the most stable ROM on Jellybean?
Thank you!
sam008 said:
guys
i used to run ICS on a stock ROM and it was quite stable. However, after trying some ROM's, I'm facing different problems on different days - sometimes battery just dies overnight, it freezes, chrome takes forever to open up, etc
Can someone recommend the most stable ROM on Jellybean?
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've enjoyed liquid smooth, rarley ever had problems.
Currently running the 9/4 CM10 nightly which has yet to cause my any problems (was running the 8/29 nightly before that)
stock.
Zepius said:
stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^ this
soon as you stray from stock you increase the chances of bugs. The devs here rock im not knocking them, but if you are looking for no glitches or bugs just stay rooted stock or unrooted even. Or go bakc to what worked fine for you
I've been using the 1.991 version of paranoidandroid for a few weeks now and can honestly say I have had no issues outside the occasional you would get with any factory stock ROM.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Been using Codename Android (CNA) 3.4.1 for almost a week now with Franco's 248 nightly Kernel.
Running smooth, good battery. Just loving it. Can't go back to stock anymore.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I am running CM10 nightly and have had very few problems, one unexpected reboot...and one screen lock. Jelly Belly was quite stable...was using that b4 I moved to CM10. Jelly Belly is very close to stock.
You want stable JB ROM? Stick with Stock then. No custom ROM can be more stable or smooth than that. Also stock kernel will go really nice with it. Don't flash any custom ROM or kernel, if customization isn't what you want.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
I'm using CM10 9/04 nightly + Trinity stable 35 (1344/384 I think?) and having no issues that I've noticed yet and battery life is doing well. First day of using this nightly and I'm at about 72% with an 4 hours on battery and an hour of screen time and a bit of Google Music. I have been on WiFi all day though.
Forgot to mention. This is the Verizon GNex with the stock battery.
Ran Liquid for the longest, and now I'm running Affinity. Give it a shot. Custom toggles, logical series, rock solid.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I've been running Xenon on my gnex and nexus 7 for a while now. I find it very stable and I like the customizations added.
SamAnders said:
I'm using CM10 9/04 nightly + Trinity stable 35 (1344/384 I think?) and having no issues that I've noticed yet and battery life is doing well. First day of using this nightly and I'm at about 72% with an 4 hours on battery and an hour of screen time and a bit of Google Music. I have been on WiFi all day though.
Forgot to mention. This is the Verizon GNex with the stock battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could get Stock pre-release Jelly Bean ROM here.
Again, if stable and smoothness is what you need and not the customization, go with stock. I know pre-release means that it might be buggy, but from what I heard, it is very stable and feels like a official stable release.
Have a nice day
For sprint stable its tomorrow
I've been using xenon hd for at least 1 month now, and I can honestly say that I have never had a single problem, issue or bug with his rom. I've flashed at least a dozen others since Jb was released (don't want to say the names) and they all have had issues.
If stability is important, stay away from kernels. Unless you want to experiment.
LiquidSmooth RC7, if you're still looking.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Flash stock rom on your phone and stop whining.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
kyokeun1234 said:
You could get Stock pre-release Jelly Bean ROM here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Attention, kyokeun1234's link is for toro (vzw google galaxy nexus), when suggesting downloading stock images it would be best to redirect users here
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images
sent from my i9250
Bugless Beast no question. I've been running it since JB came out and haven't had a single issue.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

[Q] 4.1 vs 4.2 Performance?

What's everyone's opinion on the performance difference between 4.1 and 4.2? So far my benchmark score are a little lower but the phone feels smoother. Of course I'm also drunk. Could be a factor.
Mine stutters a lot after the update, not sure what's causing it.
I don't see 4.2 as any faster, or slower than 4.1.
It was overall smooth from factory image. It's Android Jelly Bean, what do you expect? You can install it your self and find out.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
I think that they are equally smooth on stock ROM and settings but 4.1.2 was a lot smoother with franco kernel and a custom ROM.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
People seem to be saying that performance isn't so good if you do the OTA update but if you do a clean install, performance is improved over 4.2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
same performance and better battery life m happy
CADude said:
People seem to be saying that performance isn't so good if you do the OTA update but if you do a clean install, performance is improved over 4.2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. My phone feels less smooth. I'm considering a "Factory Reset" which would, if i'm not mistaken clean up the OS.
GPS!!!!!!!!
hello, i must confess that i am reading these forums since i bought my first android phone (Desire HD) some years ago. however i have kept myself quiet and now feel it is time to chit chat around. I have a maguro (takju) nexus and i installed a 4.2 deodexed rom through CWM recovery present in this link
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1992969
the transition was smooth and everything was going well. It wasn't until i left home and due to a habit i turned on the GPS on it...and voilah...no GPS lock ..even after 5 mins. I restarted the phone hoping it would solve the issue but again no GPS lock. I am well aware that i am not the only one facing this problem so i was hoping some kind soul would guide me towards a fix for this issue? if there is one...

[Q] Which JB ROM are you using and Why?

Hey guys currently just stock and rooted, getting antsy for something new, but like to stay samsung based any suggestions?
Im so glad you posted this.. i was about to post a question on a really good stock based rom. I'm currently using the cm10 one and it works awesome so far no issues but i would like to go back to touchwiz.
Just that the stock rom has a couple of things i really don't like. Mostly in the settings but if there was a way to tweak it i would go back.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Jedi Invasion is the best JB based rom I've tried so far. You can find it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2020994
no bugs or glitches, runs perfectly, and its stock based so you get the same look as before. It's also extremely debloated. Just remember to flash Ktoonsez kernel after flashing the rom.
It may not be stock based but I have always loved CyanogenMod and I'm currently using the Unofficial CM10.1 and the only problem is that the camera doesn't work.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
I've tried a bunch. My favorite so far for both performance and battery life is AOCP.
I am not a fan of TouchWiz, but on a lark I flashed the Jelly Bean TW-based Loser ROM yesterday, and I have to say I"m impressed. I might stick with this for a while.
I really like cm10 but the wifi issues and screen wake up made me flash back to stock. Still trying to find a good stable rom with decent battery life. I would rather it have fewer features with no issues than tons of features with tons of bugs.
I'm really liking LoserRom everything works out of the box, it is fast, and the battery life is looking pretty good with KT kernel. But that's all I'm looking for right now. Stock based with killer battery. Check it out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
I have used many. I have used AOKP, LiquidSmooth, CyanogenMod, ParanoidAndroid, and ParanoidKANGDroid. I'd say out of all of them, AOKP was the smoothest, I just don't like it. On CyanogenMod, it would hang and reboot and sometimes WiFi was extremely weak, and it doesn't help that most AOSP ROMs are based off of CyanogenMod. I am waiting for CM10.1 to see what happens.
justinkeck said:
It may not be stock based but I have always loved CyanogenMod and I'm currently using the Unofficial CM10.1 and the only problem is that the camera doesn't work.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it possible to use a different version of the camera? OR do you have to use the version you are on? For instance I'm on 4.1.2 and like the camera with stock 4.1.1.
I'm using Slim 3.1 and I love it, I'm getting over 1 and a half day's worth of battery with normal use, texting, emails, surfing, youtube etc.
Using task650 aokp 4.1.2 with his underwear kernel is rock solid, so much customising and been getting retarded battery life usually 1.5 days with about 6 hrs on screen time. Plus able to use it for everything lots of calls, texts, navigation,wifi, youtube, gmail. Its awesome
Sent from my SGH-I747M using xda premium
I am running the stock JB ROM, installed by Kies.
When I had my SGS, I tried flashing many different ROMs but always went back to stock because I found every ROM was buggy in one way or another.
I also bricked my phone on a couple of occasions (was able to fix it) and decided that stock did everything I wanted, so I am sticking with stock (rooted) on the S3.
Ian
raginglemon said:
I'm using Slim 3.1 and I love it, I'm getting over 1 and a half day's worth of battery with normal use, texting, emails, surfing, youtube etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is tjat a stock based rom?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
thatsupnow said:
Using task650 aokp 4.1.2 with his underwear kernel is rock solid, so much customising and been getting retarded battery life usually 1.5 days with about 6 hrs on screen time. Plus able to use it for everything lots of calls, texts, navigation,wifi, youtube, gmail. Its awesome
Sent from my SGH-I747M using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really liked tasks aokp rom. But in my case wifi kept on saying not in range after a reboot and also had screen wake issues. Did you experience any of those issues?
w98seeng said:
I am running the stock JB ROM, installed by Kies.
When I had my SGS, I tried flashing many different ROMs but always went back to stock because I found every ROM was buggy in one way or another.
I also bricked my phone on a couple of occasions (was able to fix it) and decided that stock did everything I wanted, so I am sticking with stock (rooted) on the S3.
Ian
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
But this time I'm not even thinking to root my phone, everything is good.
thatsupnow said:
Using task650 aokp 4.1.2 with his underwear kernel is rock solid, so much customising and been getting retarded battery life usually 1.5 days with about 6 hrs on screen time. Plus able to use it for everything lots of calls, texts, navigation,wifi, youtube, gmail. Its awesome
Sent from my SGH-I747M using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I SECOND THIS DUDE. This ROM is amazing. It's compatible with JusTUNbean inverse gapps and Task does one hell of a job with updates.
dlbjmb35 said:
Is it possible to use a different version of the camera? OR do you have to use the version you are on? For instance I'm on 4.1.2 and like the camera with stock 4.1.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The unofficial CM10.1 JB 4.2 for d2att (ATT version of S3) has camera working as of this morning. Apparently photosphere isn't working, but that's a pretty unnecessary feature IMHO. So far it's my favorite ROM, and aside from having to tinker with the data settings, I haven't run into any bugs.
I'm running CM10.1 (4.2.1) with KT747 and I'm getting the best battery life and performance I've ever gotten with my phone to date. This also doesn't have any of the black screen issues or anything which kept me away from vanilla android roms for awhile. All the 4.1.2 ROMs I've tried sofar speak a lot to the future of android - INCREDIBLY smooth and fluid, great battery life and awesomely stable. Especially considering they're all still in beta, it's very impressive.
Only issues are that the camera doesn't work and data can be temperamental every so often. I'm currently at 1day 5 hours, 2 hours screen on time with 46% remaining. 192mhz-1728mhz with ktoonservative.
I'm actually gunna give Task's AOKP preview a try right now. I was running it before but left because of the black screen wake issues. I was hesitant about using the preview because of the call echo issue, but it's also present in CM10.1 apparently..
Guys, the OP states he would like to stay Samsung based.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
If that's the case, serenity is my favorite. The one-handed operation features are fantastic.

How I Solved My Battery Problem On 4.2.1

I had miserable lag and battery life on 4.2.1. I tried every solution presented here. I flashed in every way imaginable. I did factory resets, wipes, etc, and nothing worked.
Then I downgraded to 4.1.1 and I had no more lag and got my battery life back.
I haven't even noticed a difference between the functionality of 4.2.1 and 4.1.1. Seriously! Try it!
OK.
For me battery life improved with 4.2.1 (as good with stock kernel as with Franco on 4.1.2) and I have had no issues.
Looks like I'm one of the few that didn't had any problem with 4.2.1, battery seems good as usual, no Bluetooth problem either, no lag.
I'm using everything stock and when I need to re-flash the room I use the 4.0.3 ROM.
Are you jelly? Sent from my jelly belly GNex
This is why I didn't upgrade until I looked at what people were saying about the update. Good thing I use a custom rom so I don't have to be nagged about it.
the problem on 4.2.1 isn´t solved^^
but same here xD i´m using 4.1.2.
got this combination:
-jellybro 4.1.2
-new camera+gallery ->4.2.1
-new clock ->4.2.1
-franco kernel 300
so i got the benefits of 4.2.1 and the performance of 4.1.2
new lockscreen of 4.2.1 is senseless in any way. performance is better on 4.1.2.
the only thing i like on 4.2.1 is the cam and the clock and i got them on 4.1.2
got great batterylife, usually 3,5h displaytime. uninstalled unnecessary things. made a few synchro-optimazations and i am very happy. disabled the transitionseffects as well, no need if apps are opened up nearly instantly
Useless thread; you didnt solve anything.
Sent from my i9250
montrealguy said:
I had miserable lag and battery life on 4.2.1. I tried every solution presented here. I flashed in every way imaginable. I did factory resets, wipes, etc, and nothing worked.
Then I downgraded to 4.1.1 and I had no more lag and got my battery life back.
I haven't even noticed a difference between the functionality of 4.2.1 and 4.1.1. Seriously! Try it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, please don't suggest this to anyone. There is no methodical approach to what you've done - or atleast you didn't specify what it was.
And, since there isn't one, this is a completely blind approach at fixing an issue.
---------- Post added at 06:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:23 PM ----------
L-ViZ said:
the problem on 4.2.1 isn´t solved^^
but same here xD i´m using 4.1.2.
got this combination:
-jellybro 4.1.2
-new camera+gallery ->4.2.1
-new clock ->4.2.1
-franco kernel 300
so i got the benefits of 4.2.1 and the performance of 4.1.2
new lockscreen of 4.2.1 is senseless in any way. performance is better on 4.1.2.
the only thing i like on 4.2.1 is the cam and the clock and i got them on 4.1.2
got great batterylife, usually 3,5h displaytime. uninstalled unnecessary things. made a few synchro-optimazations and i am very happy. disabled the transitionseffects as well, no need if apps are opened up nearly instantly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Downvoted.
4.2.1 will eventually fly no doubt, but like many others my nexus suffers from the SOD no matter what kernel I try.
I'm back on rascarlo 4.1.2 /w franco #300 and my battery must be at least 30% better off, but more importantly not one SOD/lag in sight.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
chrisgtl said:
4.2.1 will eventually fly no doubt, but like many others my nexus suffers from the SOD no matter what kernel I try.
I'm back on rascarlo 4.1.2 /w franco #300 and my battery must be at least 30% better off, but more importantly not one SOD/lag in sight.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All lies...
Flash 4.2.1 on your device, leave all stock apps on there and see what happens. Whatever is happening is probably caused by some 3rd-party application that isn't fully supported on 4.2.1.
akira02rex said:
All lies...
Flash 4.2.1 on your device, leave all stock apps on there and see what happens. Whatever is happening is probably caused by some 3rd-party application that isn't fully supported on 4.2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooh look, we have a bigger numbers are always better brigade.
Obviously not all lies, the 4.2.1 SOD has nothing to do with app's - perhaps go read the development section?
Well done for looking like a complete fool though lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
chrisgtl said:
Ooh look, we have a bigger numbers are always better brigade.
Obviously not all lies, the 4.2.1 SOD has nothing to do with app's - perhaps go read the development section?
Well done for looking like a complete fool though lol
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to be crappy or anything but how do you explain people not having SOD on 4.2.1 like myself?
I guess it's the same principle as a cpu, some overclock well, some overclock slightly, some don't overclock stable at all.
All our Nexus are different.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
chrisgtl said:
I guess it's the same principle as a cpu, some overclock well, some overclock slightly, some don't overclock stable at all.
All our Nexus are different.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All our nexus are different down to a molecular level. If Samsung quality control was letting loose devices that didn't all run the software as intended then I think we'd have much bigger issues. NO, this is NOT the same principle "as cpu"...
I do not have SOD issues at all. You can't justify you're statement one bit because you have done ZERO testing to prove otherwise. Just because you read about it in the development section doesn't mean it's true. :victory:
akira02rex said:
All our nexus are different down to a molecular level. If Samsung quality control was letting loose devices that didn't all run the software as intended then I think we'd have much bigger issues. NO, this is NOT the same principle "as cpu"...
I do not have SOD issues at all. You can't justify you're statement one bit because you have done ZERO testing to prove otherwise. Just because you read about it in the development section doesn't mean it's true. :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ok. Me and the other multiple users are obviously doing something wrong, maybe you can write us and the dev's a guide to having a SOD free experience?
Until the guide turns up I will wait for the next bug fix release as Google have admitted there is a SOD problem across the board when using 4.2.1 :victory:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
chrisgtl said:
Yeah ok. Me and the other multiple users are obviously doing something wrong, maybe you can write us and the dev's a guide to having a SOD free experience?
Until the guide turns up I will wait for the next bug fix release as Google have admitted there is a SOD problem across the board when using 4.2.1 :victory:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is the report that google admitted it?
I just suggested to you on the 1st page that you can try... Flash 4.2.1, don't install any 3rd-party applications for several days. If you're SoD-free, then try installing your apps one by one to narrow it down.
You also failed to provide any logcats.
My uptime is nearly 1 week now.. SoD-free! I must have a magical device or the molecular bonding at the factory was "just right" that day when they produced the PCB lol.
erm...i dont have SOD btw...100% stock..
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
The only SoD i had was when used google maps for navigation. Had to pull the battery. And actually that is the only one i have heard off.
Except of that i have been SoD free with atleast 5 different kernels on stock 4.2.1 with about 100 apps.
The only reason for the kernels change was to find the best for battery.
Still no luck
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Disscussion | 4.2.1 VS. 4.1.2 ?

Which is better IYO ?
I want to know opinions too, so I can know if I should upgrade or not
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Absolutely 4.1.2 , 4.1.2 optimized for GN but 4.2 optimized for N4 .
This time I have 150 app in my GN with 4.1.2 and my device very smooth but with those app in 4.2.1 my device had very lag and had serious problems.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
nathan96 said:
Which is better IYO ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer 4.2.1 on my GNex (toro). But it depends which ROM you install. I generally like XenonHD version of 4.2.1, but wasn't able to come up with a configuration that gave me really good battery life. Also, reading other threads it appears that several other 4.2 1 ROMs still have various issues. I installed Nexus Evolution 3.0 last night and it's been fantastic so far. Super smooth and every bit as slippery fast as CNA 3.8 (4.1.2) had been.... And IMO that is the best 4.1.2 toro ROM out there, and this is with over 130 apps installed.
BTW : I found that Apex Pro beta feels smoother and more responsive on the ROM than Nova does...
Back to your question though... 4.2.1 is great and I wouldn't go back to 4.1.2.
beamed from my Nexus 10, far, far away...
4.2.1
Sent from my GNexus
I prefer 4.2.1 but it drains more battery as 4.1.2
I wouldn't go back to 4.1.2
I prefer the stability of 4.1.2 for the way i use my phone. I seem to have better range with 4.2.1 but deal with flaky WiFi, Bluetooth and occasional lag. Battery life seems equal between the two for the way I use my phone. If they fix the radio drivers and smooth out the UI, I would prefer 4.2.x.
Wow. 4.2.1 shouldnt be in a stage like you people say, it reminds me that 4.2.1 is beta, which it isnt. i dunno if 4.2.2 is out yet but it must fix this bugs. also, Google is starting to not care with the GNex anynore because the N4 is out.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I'm still using 4.1.2 because for me it's more fluid. 4.2.1 seems a ROM in beta stage.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
4.2.1 works fine for me. No noticeable performance difference than 4.1 and battery life is the same as long as your phone settings and usage remains the same. I use rasbean now but ran stock for about a month, performance is the same, I just prefer the theme (with white settings mod) and features of rasbean.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
I'm close to going back to 4.1.2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I had random reboots with 4.2.1 stock and my nexus was quite laggy, so I came back to 4.1.2 CM10 and everything is smooth again! :good:
Do you know if the reboot bug has been solved?
Using 4.1.2 for a change but as mentioned by Many i feel it is very stable and better suited for Gnexus
threeph said:
I had random reboots with 4.2.1 stock and my nexus was quite laggy, so I came back to 4.1.2 CM10 and everything is smooth again! :good:
Do you know if the reboot bug has been solved?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.2.1 has been stable for me. Do you know if your reboot issue was reported to Google? A lot of reboots on 4.2.1 were attributed to an app causing it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I'm on rasbeanjelly 4.2 and I don't have any issues whatsoever. Its fast, smooth, responsive and all around awesome. So far its the best 4.2 ROM I've been on. But I'm thinking about trying evolution out. Looks tempting....4.2 is growing on me. I didn't like it all that much at first but now, wouldn't go back to anything lower then that
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I've stayed with rooted stock 4.1.2 because I've read a lot of reports of trouble with Bluetooth under 4.2.1, especially when trying to connect to a car stereo. This has included poor sound quality.
Is anyone running stock 4.2.1 that is having solid Bluetooth performance in general and with their car stereo in particular? Also, I depend heavily on Stickmount to mount a flash drive via a USB OTG cable. Has this been working for folks under stock 4.2.1?
4.1.2 because it's more stable and less buggy
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I have yet to even try 4.2.1 lol due to what I've read about it on here. I'm so happy with xblack that I don't feel the need to
4.2.1
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I just got mine while on travel the last week, so I'm still on 4.11. Will the freeze issue described here that (mostly) pertains to earlier versions be solved when I go to 4.12? Some there said that it shouldn't even be happening in 4.1, so I'm beginning to wonder.

Categories

Resources