Develop Bugs

Jelly Bean ROM?

I'm trying to decide which JB ROM to install onto my E4GT... The candidates are:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1812078 (AOSP Jelly Bean)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1810315&highlight=alpha5 (CM10)
They're both in the alpha development phase, but I want to know which is "smoother" (i.e. which has fewer bugs, and can be better used as a daily driver).
Any help would be appreciated.

I personally like the AOSP jelly bean better
And don't let the Alpha tag fool you.. It surely doesn't run as an alpha
I would recommend to make sure you do a CLEAN wipe and get a gps lock before you flash it though.. Helps makes things a lot smoother
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

What's a gps lock.?
Sent from the batman

joeyman08 said:
What's a gps lock.?
Sent from the batman
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You go into your Google maps (that's if you use it) turn on your gps and let it get a lock on your location
Say if you where getting directions from where you are (home-my location ).. That's a gps lock
-Sent From My Tapatalk Like A Boss

aksa said:
I'm trying to decide which JB ROM to install onto my E4GT... The candidates are:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1812078 (AOSP Jelly Bean)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1810315&highlight=alpha5 (CM10)
They're both in the alpha development phase, but I want to know which is "smoother" (i.e. which has fewer bugs, and can be better used as a daily driver).
Any help would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are the same basic rom and will have the same bugs. CM10 for our device is based off of sbrissen's aosp build.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

I have been running CM10 Alpha 5.2 ... I get a GPS lock inside (something FH18 didnt do)...

Im trying to install cm10 too should use the el26 kernel because im on gingerbread?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium

aghasi24 said:
Im trying to install cm10 too should use the el26 kernel because im on gingerbread?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are rooted with a.custom recovery you should be fine

I'm on cm10, have been for three weeks. Its definitely been the best experience with my phone. So much fun. Still, nothing touches how well your phone works with GB. Go for cm10 )
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app

My vote goes for CM10. The battery life is the only down side so far. They will work on tweaking settings later (for battery life, etc). Right now they are working on fixing bugs. I am currently running 5.2 and it is smooth and stable.
Good luck!

I really want a touchwiz JB from. I actually enjoy touchwiz
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA

Ind3lible said:
I really want a touchwiz JB from. I actually enjoy touchwiz
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still on GB, but post 151 in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1558337 says it works on JB CM10. Let me know if it works for you, as that is one of the things that is holding me back from switching to JB.

Why CM9, CM10

* * ​First of all I tried CM9 (Maclaw's version) and I like it very much, but there is a lot of bugs which make it non-stable and not daily use rom.
So, why you guys want to port, create and use something that is not finished, stable and with broken apps and stuff? And plus CM9/10 are not, and probably won't be able on Gio ever.
We don't have official CM7 yet, but CM7 is much more stable then CM9/10.
I just don't understand why would someone use his phone if i.e. bluetooth, camera, and other stuff don't work properly or don't work at all.
Of course, if you can make CM9/10 to work i.e. like CM7 it's ok, but I see a lot of new roms, and they are all based on CM9/10 which means that they are not working properly so again I'm wondering why would someone use it.
This is an open discussion so feel free to express your own thoughts and opinions. :good:
p.s. I'll go to bed now, so I'll read your thought tomorrow. :fingers-crossed:
* *​

maybe cuz they dont use their phone as camera, or never use bluetooth.
I havent had cm10 on my gio.
I still stuck to GB.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

I somewhat agree. While it's nice to have the latest bells and whistles on our phones to test out, they will never fully work. I've had my Gio for over a year, about first month of it I used stock. I'd already forgotten what a stable phone looked like and decided yesterday to try a stock based ROM. It's really fast and everything seems to be working flawlessly. It's a shame there aren't more gingerbread/stock based ROMs under active development. I think I'm gonna use it now, but I will check back to JB roms to see how new updates work.

I think because they r different. I m bored with stock n cm 7. I need a change and u 9 that change is good but still a galaxy gio
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

Well it depends on everyone how they use their phone but for me Maclaws CM9 RC1 is still the best ROM and optimized for my daily use even though camera doesnt works which isnt a big problem for me cuz I dont use. Yet My battery doesnt last long because of this and i feel that i have -ed my phone features.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda premium

I'm using cm10 from jellaxy.com everithing are wrking without wifihotspot and camera recorde
Sent from my dmtech725h but have gio too:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

I'm enjoying Jelly Bean (AOKP) on my Samsung Galaxy Gio. I think it's so beautiful that I can't go back to a stock-based ROM. Also, I do really like Google Now, and as that is only working in Jelly Bean, it is an extra reason for me. But yes, I miss a lot of functionality, although I don't use the camera much. Sometimes my phone reacts too late, but I think it's worth it. So I am very happy there are devs for ICS and JB.

Froony said:
I'm enjoying Jelly Bean (AOKP) on my Samsung Galaxy Gio. I think it's so beautiful that I can't go back to a stock-based ROM. Also, I do really like Google Now, and as that is only working in Jelly Bean, it is an extra reason for me. But yes, I miss a lot of functionality, although I don't use the camera much. Sometimes my phone reacts too late, but I think it's worth it. So I am very happy there are devs for ICS and JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree. Jelly Bean (AOKP) is such a great rom. Everything works (for me). I have no complaints so far. Furthermore the smothness of the rom is so great. Everythings works as it should.
One satisfied User.

S
please can someone fix all bugs on CM9,CM10c:good:

Thawapricz said:
please can someone fix all bugs on CM9,CM10c:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that's pretty hard to do. I mean, if someone can fix all bugs, they'll be fixed already, right...
So, I think it will need a little bit more time to make a bugfree CM9/10.

Cm9 need only videocam fix .. and almost all armv6 had it, just wait...
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

...time to make a bugfree CM9/10. :)[/QUOTE said:
I got my Gio with 2.3.6 (or was it 2.3.7?), a late gingerbread version. it worked so far, but was slow with scrolling and opening apps. when first trying the maclaw cm9 it got a lot smoother, faster. that was a real progress, apart from that the camera was not working and other bugs. also, with rc2 bluetooth got broken again, very annoing.
so i discovered jellaxy and tried all the aokp, cm9, cm10. I dont need the latest features, so cm9 would be ok for me; but cm9 seems not so stable than cm10. aokp seemed nice, but no profiles and no lockscreen app configuration.
of course, with that amount of memory i have to use a swap partition and link2sd, but I think I get the most out of this cheap handy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

P
RonninDAMN said:
Well, that's pretty hard to do. I mean, if someone can fix all bugs, they'll be fixed already, right...
So, I think it will need a little bit more time to make a bugfree CM9/10.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah right

RonninDAMN said:
* * ​First of all I tried CM9 (Maclaw's version) and I like it very much, but there is a lot of bugs which make it non-stable and not daily use rom.
So, why you guys want to port, create and use something that is not finished, stable and with broken apps and stuff? And plus CM9/10 are not, and probably won't be able on Gio ever.
We don't have official CM7 yet, but CM7 is much more stable then CM9/10.
I just don't understand why would someone use his phone if i.e. bluetooth, camera, and other stuff don't work properly or don't work at all.
Of course, if you can make CM9/10 to work i.e. like CM7 it's ok, but I see a lot of new roms, and they are all based on CM9/10 which means that they are not working properly so again I'm wondering why would someone use it.
This is an open discussion so feel free to express your own thoughts and opinions. :good:
p.s. I'll go to bed now, so I'll read your thought tomorrow. :fingers-crossed:
* *​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have run maclaws cm9 in 1 month now and i run it becuse i think it is beutifyl
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

I am using cm7.2 now thinking to use ics or jb. But need stable version. Will try aokp.
If it will not work for me i will move back to stock rom.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using Tapatalk 2

Jellybean CM10 by Jellaxy is my daily ROM. Last update is amazing, everything works fine.
CM9 by Jellaxy is also very stable, but I prefer JB.
CM7? Marcin 1147's
Change CPU governor to Smartass2 and Launcher to any other.

crlgio said:
Jellybean CM10 by Jellaxy is my daily ROM. Last update is amazing, everything works fine.
CM9 by Jellaxy is also very stable, but I prefer JB.
CM7? Marcin 1147's
Change CPU governor to Smartass2 and Launcher to any other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but jb hasn't got official adreno libs .. so graphical issue, also it lack of ram and lag a bit, for me the choice is cm9- based, because cm9 is ugly, instead miui,aokp,cna are better
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app

Biggest problem with JB are the omxlib so use cm9 AOKP and you get a nice ROM with almost everything working.

manpildo said:
It's a shame there aren't more gingerbread/stock based ROMs under active development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you. Devs should develop GB roms, because our phones were made to run in GB for some reason (other than company profit) and it's so stable. You can use any GB rom for everyday use because there aren't any problems in modding it.

We have cm7, miui, lewa os and stock samsung gb rom, gb development is complete, now let's go at next step ,ics require same specs of gb, jb requires only some fixes ( adreno lib and omx), so for now ics is like phiexz cm7 at starting, all that is working is working better than stock, the other thing have to be fixed, but as you can know, in ics only camcorder have to be fixed, I wanna just say, wait a month and then i will bet that you will switch to ics
Sent from my GT-5660 using xda-developers app

[Q] Slim Bean Or CM10 Or CM9 ?

Slim Bean Or CM10 Or CM9 Which The Better And Why ?

i think CM9 and slim bean is more stability than CM10. you must detect which rom ( thanks to all manufacturer ) satisfy you according to battery life or game performance...

What do u need from a rom ?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium

UltimHero said:
What do u need from a rom ?
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fast , HD Gaming , Bettery life

Just in time, I have a whole day thinking what ROM that will stay for a while with my phone. I choosing for CM9, Slimbean and CM10, and the thread came up just in time. I also look for fast by default, camera, HD Gaming, most of all, battery life. In short, overall performance.
Need for an advise.

CM10 hands down or SlimBean is just as good as its based off CM10 anyway. CM9 is just too old and has mch poorer performance. Chances are those who promote CM9 hasn't even USED CM10 and is just watching it.

Just try each of them out, everyone has different experiences, i would go for cm9 for now, cm10/ slimbean when kernel 3.0 is fully working, just my opinion.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2

CM10 hands down or SlimBean is just as good as its based off CM10 anyway. CM9 is just too old and has mch poorer performance. Chances are those who promote CM9 hasn't even USED CM10 and is just watching it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For now the performance difference is small, until the kernel 3.0 is fully working then we will see the real difference . However cm9 is more stable and I tried both os for a long time to judge . Anyways you are the one to choose witch one you like .
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium

MidoTawfik7 said:
Slim Bean Or CM10 Or CM9 Which The Better And Why ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just flash slim bean and cm10 4 days ago..but revert back to cm9 because of games performance..in my cm9,can play hd games (anomaly baghdad, anomaly korea,defense zone 2) and subway surfer with 122-1024 mhz without lag..on cm10 those games a bit lag with same frequency..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2

[Q] neeb search for CM-7 Last version

hello everyone
i have samsung galaxy w and i'm using stock rom on it
my device stuck all the time with no reason
i want to change the rom to something better i'm thinking of CM9 but i see that alot of things not working yet and all versions i could find are still in development
there for i think that CM7 is better
am i right? is CM better then CM9 for galaxy wonder?
to the final reason i post this thread is that i couldnt find CM7 for download
i would like for some help if its OK
thanks to all

ICS is stable right now. Try to use OneOfAKind. Trust me. It's very smooth.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

thanks for replay
MeowNYC said:
ICS is stable right now. Try to use OneOfAKind. Trust me. It's very smooth.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which version should i use
and from where can i download it

is there a cm7 for galaxy w?
if you want a stable, smooth for gaming, and good battery life, use cm9.
if you want the latest with all new features, smooth as butter, but have some minor bugs, use cm10.1

Cyanogenmod

Hello I'd like to know if exist any other official version before CM9 and where I can find it. Thanks!!
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

No official CM exists for galaxy w. Not even CM7.... You can find all official CM info on their website.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

Oh OK and where can I find the 7 or 8 version? And they are released by Arco also? Like 9-10-10.1? I'm just looking for an earlier version of cyanogenmod that is completed. But I still don't like the last three versions.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

WataruFujii said:
Oh OK and where can I find the 7 or 8 version? And they are released by Arco also? Like 9-10-10.1? I'm just looking for an earlier version of cyanogenmod that is completed. But I still don't like the last three versions.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK there is no CM8... And for CM7, I don't believe ARCO ever built CM7 for galaxy w. There is a CM7 port in development section if I remember correctly. It is not from ARCO and it had some bugs....
May I ask why you don't like the last three versions. CM9 is pretty much bug free and quite stable. Even CM10 is pretty stable and currently using it. It is stable enough for me for daily use.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

Because they drain too much battery and after some period they start to give some problem. At the beginning they are awesome but after they're not pretty good. I always do pristine to make things go better, but I just want a stable rom that is only faster then the original one on my galaxy w. And the cm's rom are not satisfying me.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

WataruFujii said:
Because they drain too much battery and after some period they start to give some problem. At the beginning they are awesome but after they're not pretty good. I always do pristine to make things go better, but I just want a stable rom that is only faster then the original one on my galaxy w. And the cm's rom are not satisfying me.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't like sir arco's work, you can just use stock rom, which is samsung's work. Just don't put a bad comment, not stable enough or what so ever. I don't know why you still feel that cm9 also not stable enough. I think all the cm9, cm10 and cm10.1 are all very stable and very good for daily use. But if you don't satisfy enough, and i don't know what will make you satisfy, just make your own rom.
Sent from my CM10.1 Wonder using xda premium

geniusboy93 said:
If you don't like sir arco's work, you can just use stock rom, which is samsung's work. Just don't put a bad comment, not stable enough or what so ever. I don't know why you still feel that cm9 also not stable enough. I think all the cm9, cm10 and cm10.1 are all very stable and very good for daily use. But if you don't satisfy enough, and i don't know what will make you satisfy, just make your own rom.
Sent from my CM10.1 Wonder using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK first of all cool down a little bit. Everybody has different needs and what maybe stable for you might not be stable for somebody else. For me I had reboot issues for a very long time with CM9 but so many did not. But with the latest releases, bugs that bothered me disappeared.
And don't blame people for searching alternatives to satisfy their needs. And not everybody has development skills to built roms.
Sometimes I don't get you people. CM is not a religion and arco is not a prophet. I don't get why you people are so serious.
I am grateful that ARCO developed CM for us and I can't thank him enough. But gee it is just a phone and a ROM.
My suggestion to you is to CHILL...
I don't think ARCO needs your protection and his work speaks for itself.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

thearif said:
OK first of all cool down a little bit. Everybody has different needs and what maybe stable for you might not be stable for somebody else. For me I had reboot issues for a very long time with CM9 but so many did not. But with the latest releases, bugs that bothered me disappeared.
And don't blame people for searching alternatives to satisfy their needs. And not everybody has development skills to built roms.
Sometimes I don't get you people. CM is not a religion and arco is not a prophet. I don't get why you people are so serious.
I am grateful that ARCO developed CM for us and I can't thank him enough. But gee it is just a phone and a ROM.
My suggestion to you is to CHILL...
I don't think ARCO needs your protection and his work speaks for itself.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okey, sorry about that. Not that arco is a prophet, not at all. But i don't get it why people can't be grateful for what they got. Sorry for burst out. I just a little mad at that time.
Sent from my CM10.1 Wonder using xda premium

No, Arco is no prophet, just human like you and me. There you are right. He is a very smart guy who deserves a lot of thanks for porting CM9 to this device.
You just must understand many people are really really very thankful to him and sometimes overstating by threating him like a god.
I for myself also do not understand why CM9 isn´t working stable for you. It´s a really stable rom. Way more stable than Samsungs stock ROMs. With these I had always random reboots. That´s not the case since using Arcos CM9. Maybe it´s some apps you are using or your SDCard causing this.
Ok, but to be honest regarding stability in the final release I can´t tell. I was using RC2 with it´s older kernel till now because of the battery drain. it was running absolutely stable for me without any issues plus it gave me a awesome battery life, so I compiled my own kernel where i reduced it further. So if you are not satisfied with the final, you can try RC2 or RC3 together with my kernel. It gives way better battery life than Samsungs stock ROM will ever offer you.
However I updated last night to the final release and the battery drain appears to be the same like using Arcos CM9 RC2 with its stock kernel. So if the results will satisfy me, I will stay with the final and build a new personal kernel for it.

geniusboy93 said:
If you don't like sir arco's work, you can just use stock rom, which is samsung's work. Just don't put a bad comment, not stable enough or what so ever. I don't know why you still feel that cm9 also not stable enough. I think all the cm9, cm10 and cm10.1 are all very stable and very good for daily use. But if you don't satisfy enough, and i don't know what will make you satisfy, just make your own rom.
Sent from my CM10.1 Wonder using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't say I don't like his work. I totally respect him and his work, cause his work is really awesome. But it still don't satisying my needs. I need only something faster then the stock rom and something that doesn't drain my battery out.
So if anyone could reccomend me somethin to use I would be very grateful. And BIG RESPECT for arco's work!

WataruFujii said:
I didn't say I don't like his work. I totally respect him and his work, cause his work is really awesome. But it still don't satisying my needs. I need only something faster then the stock rom and something that doesn't drain my battery out.
So if anyone could reccomend me somethin to use I would be very grateful. And BIG RESPECT for arco's work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the latest ROMs are based on ARCO's CM versions and I believe they will perform on the same level. However some of them may have some extra customizations to improve battery and performance etc. You may want to check their threads and see their features. Also there are some custom ROMs based on stock Samsung Roms. (Gingerbread) Like FAW, rebel etc. They may have custom kernels to speed up the phone.
When was the last time you tried CM9? Because as @honeyx noted, the latest version does seem to have good battery performance and stability.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

thearif said:
Most of the latest ROMs are based on ARCO's CM versions and I believe they will perform on the same level. However some of them may have some extra customizations to improve battery and performance etc. You may want to check their threads and see their features. Also there are some custom ROMs based on stock Samsung Roms. (Gingerbread) Like FAW, rebel etc. They may have custom kernels to speed up the phone.
When was the last time you tried CM9? Because as @honeyx noted, the latest version does seem to have good battery performance and stability.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now I'm using the cm 9 rc 9. I didn't try the final release yet. Because I'm bored to pristine every time my phone. I will try it. But I don't mind if the rom's are based on CM. I just want any rom that is more fluid than the rom stock and that doesn't drain my battery. And which one would someone of you reccomend me. Anyway I will try the last version of CM9!
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app

WataruFujii said:
Now I'm using the cm 9 rc 9. I didn't try the final release yet. Because I'm bored to pristine every time my phone. I will try it. But I don't mind if the rom's are based on CM. I just want any rom that is more fluid than the rom stock and that doesn't drain my battery. And which one would someone of you reccomend me. Anyway I will try the last version of CM9!
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I already told you, try the final and if that doesn´t satisfy you regarding battery life, try the older RC2 or RC3. If one of these gives you better results, you can also try my kernel for them.

honeyx said:
As I already told you, try the final and if that doesn´t satisfy you regarding battery life, try the older RC2 or RC3. If one of these gives you better results, you can also try my kernel for them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey honeyx, will you develop a custom kernel for EOL version since it is equally good in terms of battery and stability?

egagah said:
hey honeyx, will you develop a custom kernel for EOL version since it is equally good in terms of battery and stability?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so, but I will focus on reducing the consumption further than adding a lot of governors. But this will require a lot of testing before launching it. Currently I´m testing the newer 3.0.81 kernel to which Arco updated his sources after launching the final release. This new kernel just has some changes in memory management like the latest kernel for CM10.1 where some people reported to get hangs. So I just added the lulzactive governor, incrased ram and reduced the voltages to first check it´s stability, but so far I didn´t get any hangs and freezes in games.
I´m really anal about stability and consumption and only will release a kernel that is working rock solid for me.