Sprint s3 webtraffic article - Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III

http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjo...amsung-galaxy-s-iii-traffic-in-north-america/
thought it was interesting and pertains to us !

Yeah suck it Verizon and att
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Sprint had the phone longer than at&t and Verizon bias study Lol in our favor.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium App

Not surprising at all. Verizon main focus is their Droid branded line, ATT is a still pushing the Icrap., and tmobile well its tmobile doesn't have the footprint as the rest.
Sprint on the other hand pushes the Gs3 and the Note2 over the other phones.
Sent from a planet far far away.

bonebeatz1234 said:
Sprint had the phone longer than at&t and Verizon bias study Lol in our favor.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They only measured traffic for one week this february

Related

T-Mobile or AT&T?

So there's s3 at T-Mobile but not att? Is it worth going to T-Mobile from.att?
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Switching Carriers over some launch availability issues? Devices are out there now in pretty decent numveds , Best Buy is selling them over the counter today as well.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
I have t-mobile, but if I had att I wouldn't switch just because of handset availability.
If you are out of contract you should weigh the pros and cons of each in terms of coverage in your area, pricing of comparable plans to satisfy your needs, and THEN device selection.
Plus if you wait a lil longer you can maybe get your hands on the red version!
You realise you can get the AT&T GS3 overnighted to you. You just have to call up and ask for one.
I have a new line with the one x and I'm within my 30 days maybe I'll just see if bb has them. I would switch carriers based on horrible service that att has
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I wouldn't switch.. far as I know ( and correct me if I'm wrong ) the T-Mobile version of the SGSIII does NOT have LTE !! To me, that would be a waste.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
LordGeek said:
I wouldn't switch.. far as I know ( and correct me if I'm wrong ) the T-Mobile version of the SGSIII does NOT have LTE !! To me, that would be a waste.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has badass hspa+ (42mbps) though which can just as fast as lte depending on location. And it doesnt kill battery like lte, so id say the tmo version is a great option..
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
T-Mobile is cheaper in the long run, and HSPA 41 is faster than any LTE available
z0phi3l said:
T-Mobile is cheaper in the long run, and HSPA 41 is faster than any LTE available
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
Sent from my AT&T Galaxy S III
z0phi3l said:
T-Mobile is cheaper in the long run, and HSPA 41 is faster than any LTE available
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol i don't know about that.. depending on your att plan and the fact that the t-mo s3 is 80 dollars more than the other 3 carriers
Sent from my Galaxy S III
zaisaroni said:
Switching Carriers over some launch availability issues? Devices are out there now in pretty decent numveds , Best Buy is selling them over the counter today as well.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, Best Buy is not selling AT&T Galaxy S3's over the counter! I dont know where you have heard that, but you definitely haven't been following either of the 2 Official Best Buy Galaxy S3 threads.
If Best Buy does have them in stock for AT&T, which is a HUGE IF, they are saying they cannot sell them because AT&T has not announced an official release date/launch date. I know, that makes not sense and is a huge lie, but that is what they are saying.
So NO, Best Buy is not selling AT&T Galaxy S3's over the counter.
id10terrordfw said:
Really?
Sent from my AT&T Galaxy S III
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you .. LMAO
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
3rdamention said:
LOL, Best Buy is not selling AT&T Galaxy S3's over the counter! I dont know where you have heard that, but you definitely haven't been following either of the 2 Official Best Buy Galaxy S3 threads.
If Best Buy does have them in stock for AT&T, which is a HUGE IF, they are saying they cannot sell them because AT&T has not announced an official release date/launch date. I know, that makes not sense and is a huge lie, but that is what they are saying.
So NO, Best Buy is not selling AT&T Galaxy S3's over the counter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bull because I bought mine last Thursday at Best Buy without a pre order. Lafayette LA store.
LordGeek said:
Thank you .. LMAO
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be nice if at&t LTE could run in 20MHz of spectrum everywhere... but it can't. 49Mbps is far few and inbetween for at&t LTE
From my T-Mobile Galaxy S III in HD
T-mobile
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
heygrl said:
It would be nice if at&t LTE could run in 20MHz of spectrum everywhere... but it can't. 49Mbps is far few and inbetween for at&t LTE
From my T-Mobile Galaxy S III in HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, I normally hit just 40 mbit down all over Fort Worth, including downtown.
Sent from my AT&T Galaxy S III
Why do I only get like low 20s with tmo and high 40 s with AT&T then lol horrible indeed......
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
20 mbs Down is fast enough... Specially if your are paying 50 a months like I am
Sent from my SGH-T999 using XDA Premium HD app
Screaming Ball Sweat said:
So there's s3 at T-Mobile but not att? Is it worth going to T-Mobile from.att?
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tmo unlocked will work for sure with att hspa +, it's unknown if they can make that happen with the Att version.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
murdermonkey9000 said:
Tmo unlocked will work for sure with att hspa +, it's unknown if they can make that happen with the Att version.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will not work with att version
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium

Sprint lte 4G speeds Boston

Not bad eh?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Pretty good i say.
castano22 said:
Not bad eh?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just curious. where in Boston? I am in east boston with nothing
castano22 said:
Not bad eh?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the words of Wolverine from the first X-men movie: "Holy sh¡t"
Lol, the swearword gets edited. I did not know that.
anth75 said:
Just curious. where in Boston? I am in east boston with nothing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was at Brookline near Harvard Ave
adamhlj said:
In the words of Wolverine from the first X-men movie: "Holy sh¡t"
Lol, the swearword gets edited. I did not know that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's from the second one, actually. When he fights the chick with his abilities.
Sent from my AOSP Android 4.1.1 Galaxy Nexus.
Zeinzu said:
That's from the second one, actually. When he fights the chick with his abilities.
Sent from my AOSP Android 4.1.1 Galaxy Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah, you are right! Haha, I need to watch those movies again.
These were the other day. I'm in the southwest suburbs of Chicago, and its been polling up all over. The speeds vary in different locations, but I haven't seen anything really bad yet. And its not even "officially" on yet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Not Verizon LTE speeds, but much better than Sprint 3G.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
itsalexaye90 said:
Not Verizon LTE speeds, but much better than Sprint 3G.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly, my speeds with big red weren't really that far off. I've very seldom gotten over 30 down and 10 up w Verizon. They're about the same as far as the speeds I've seen. Its the coverage that's scketchy.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
itsalexaye90 said:
Not Verizon LTE speeds, but much better than Sprint 3G.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Carrier pigeon is faster than Sprint 3g, so it doesn't take much.
But yeah. Those are pretty good speeds. Glad to see Sprint picking up their game.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I get 1-2mbps 3g and 6-12mbs 4g but this is in the Baltimore area.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
i'm trying to locate a good place to buy Sprint Nexus off-contract, mint-condition used or new to use on Sprint network without signing/extending contact. i currently have gt-i9250 on t-mobile, while my friend has htc evo on sprint, i wanna switch him over to nexus experience without singing another 2 year contract.
Anyone knows a good place in Boston/Mass/NH or online where i can buy SPH-L700?!
Thank you in advance
and sorry for not creating separate thread.
Not to be a downer, but when I got the TBolt (First Verizon 4G Lte phone) my speeds were constantly 35+ Mbps everywhere I went. Now that everyone and their mother has a 4G phone I am lucky to get about 10 - 15Mbps in most places. Saturation is a killer.

Why does Verizon suck??

I just want some 4.2 on my phone but they never update. Stupid GSM gets it the day after its released but all of us CDMA users have to wait until forever. Post your rants and raves below.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
This isn't anything new. Why is this still being discussed?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Right, this question has been answered hundreds of times.
More productive to build my own 4.2...and I did.
adrynalyne said:
More productive to build my own 4.2...and I did.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any issue with the radios like when we first got JB but had to use ICS radios?
WiredPirate said:
Any issue with the radios like when we first got JB but had to use ICS radios?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, not really.
GPS issues are annoying, but fixable.
fk.gregor said:
I just want some 4.2 on my phone but they never update. Stupid GSM gets it the day after its released but all of us CDMA users have to wait until forever. Post your rants and raves below.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "stupid" gsm phones are so stupid that Google thinks they need to update them because they are too stupid to handle 4.1. Forgot to mention that everyone who has a gsm phone is stupid.
Sent from my GSM Galaxy Nexus THAT GOT 4.2 OTA FROM GOOGLE using xda premium
fk.gregor said:
I just want some 4.2 on my phone but they never update. Stupid GSM gets it the day after its released but all of us CDMA users have to wait until forever. Post your rants and raves below.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never update? I guess that 4.1 update Verizon did was a figment of my(and many users') imagination.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
You gave the it a day. Really, one day for them to port in their different radios, drivers ect and test it. One day? You do realize its not the same phone right?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
I don't understand why everyone always complains about Verizon. Muzzy's 4.2 is running pretty good right now on mine and I am grandfathered and get employee discount my plan after taxes I pay $70 for unlimited I am pretty happy with them, guess I am an exception
I'm in sprint so at least you have LTE and decent 3g. Sounds like you need a nexus 4 on T-Mobile
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
fk.gregor said:
I just want some 4.2 on my phone but they never update. Stupid GSM gets it the day after its released but all of us CDMA users have to wait until forever. Post your rants and raves below.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who's more stupid? The one that paid way more than 200$ for a carrier branded "LTE" crapware bloated CDMA, nexus, with the most inconvenienced extra fees and plans, or the one that purchased a GSM HSPA+ unlucked direct from Google for 350$ if you're gonna call some consumers stupid, remember you got 3 fingers pointing at you, from your own hand leaving your index hanging, buddy
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
NeoMagus said:
I don't understand why everyone always complains about Verizon. Muzzy's 4.2 is running pretty good right now on mine and I am grandfathered and get employee discount my plan after taxes I pay $70 for unlimited I am pretty happy with them, guess I am an exception
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I for the most part just dislike the company policies. The service is fine, just a little pricey. Customer service has always left me wanting better, and I personally find the handling of the Galaxy Nexus to be quite the fiasco.
suprakarma said:
Who's more stupid? The one that paid way more than 200$ for a carrier branded "LTE" crapware bloated CDMA, nexus, with the most inconvenienced extra fees and plans, or the one that purchased a GSM HSPA+ unlucked direct from Google for 350$ if you're gonna call some consumers stupid, remember you got 3 fingers pointing at you, from your own hand leaving your index hanging, buddy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think that "stupid" was directed at GSM or it's users, more just a "stupid" of frustration.
I thought it was ATT that sucked...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Verizon works almost everywhere, they don't suck at all. Either jump ship n complain about crappy coverage, or install 4.2 yourself
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Verizon sucks because Verizon doesn't care. Wasn't my words, but of a Verizon employee. I thought it was common knowledge but alas, this thread exists.
suprakarma said:
Who's more stupid? The one that paid way more than 200$ for a carrier branded "LTE" crapware bloated CDMA, nexus, with the most inconvenienced extra fees and plans, or the one that purchased a GSM HSPA+ unlucked direct from Google for 350$ if you're gonna call some consumers stupid, remember you got 3 fingers pointing at you, from your own hand leaving your index hanging, buddy
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calling a phone stupid, to someone calling a person stupid...
using "stupid""as in being frustrated because i want the latest on my phone. i'm not calling anyone stupid.
by the way i point with my whole hand not just one finger.
fk.gregor said:
using "stupid""as in being frustrated because i want the latest on my phone. i'm not calling anyone stupid.
by the way i point with my whole hand not just one finger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to say...
Verizon and sprint updated their galaxy nexus to 4.1 via OTA months after jellybean came out.
But the key here is that they still kept their promise and we had jelly bean before any other phone on their roster.
Even the hottest phone of the year Galaxy s3 didn't get jellybean till this week.(Verizon still waiting)
Verizon held up their end. You were the first to get jelly bean and unless the nexus 4 comes to Verizon, you will be the first on Verizon to have 4.2
The new Droid DNA comes with 4.1.2 so you're fine.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I'm sorry, I can't hear you over my LTE and no dropped calls. What's that? You have HSPA+? Im sorry your breaking up...must be all that high latency.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

T-Mobile will launch refreshed Galaxy S III with LTE support

Source: http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/8/38...aunch-refreshed-galaxy-s-iii-with-lte-support
At a CES briefing today, T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray revealed to The Verge that the company will launch a refreshed version of Samsung's wildly popular Galaxy S III that features support for its upcoming LTE network — a network that has now been confirmed to launch commercially any week now. It's not yet known whether the phone will be marketed as a new, distinct model or as a silent and unadvertised swap on store shelves.
Though the Galaxy S III that's presently being offered by T-Mobile does not support LTE, the slightly newer Galaxy Note II does; Ray tells us that it'll require a "small" software update to enable it once it's available. No other LTE-capable phones have been announced by T-Mobile yet, but it's likely that we'll see some announcements as the first markets go live across the first and second quarter of the year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the chances that this is really just the T999? If its really a brand new model (T999LTE / T1000 / T:silly::silly::silly, how many of you would sell your current T999 and upgrade?
Other good reads:
T-Mobile may launch LTE in Las Vegas this month
http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/8/3852194/t-mobile-may-launch-lte-in-las-vegas-this-month
T-Mobile Galaxy Note II has dormant LTE support, may require software update
http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/25/3554328/t-mobile-galaxy-note-ii-lte-support
T999L - We've been hearing bits and pieces about it (Mostly speculation) for a little while now. Nice to have some confirmation though.
Edit: And if the LTE happens to cover my area, you can bet that I'll sell my T999 and get a T999L
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Thetenthdr said:
T999L - We've been hearing bits and pieces about it (Mostly speculation) for a little while now. Nice to have some confirmation though.
Edit: And if the LTE happens to cover my area, you can bet that I'll sell my T999 and get a T999L
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for what? lte consumes more power and isnt any faster than what youre already using. in fact, some would argue it is slower...
...and the Vibrant story repeats itself. T-mobile sure loves doing this. At least my unlocked T999 is ready to switch when I get the money to do so.
nirogu325 said:
...and the Vibrant story repeats itself. T-mobile sure loves doing this. At least my unlocked T999 is ready to switch when I get the money to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amen brother, I hope we keep the development though like the vibrant did though
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Hell no I'm not upgrading lol.
S4 baby
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
mrmako777 said:
for what? lte consumes more power and isnt any faster than what youre already using. in fact, some would argue it is slower...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it will be slower than this. Granted, this is worse than usual, but still...
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Thetenthdr said:
I doubt it will be slower than this. Granted, this is worse than usual, but still...
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that's horrible. I get around 15mbps download.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Towle said:
Wow, that's horrible. I get around 15mbps download.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah... and I'm supposedly in an excellent coverage area.
Thetenthdr said:
I doubt it will be slower than this. Granted, this is worse than usual, but still...
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well dude, youre on edge. 2 soup cans with a string in the middle is faster if youre not getting "4g" now, doubt you would be getting lte in the future...
mrmako777 said:
well dude, youre on edge. 2 soup cans with a string in the middle is faster if youre not getting "4g" now, doubt you would be getting lte in the future...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me dream dammit! Lol
But seriously, that's why I said "If it happens to cover my area". I know it likely wont, but hey, who knows. I can already almost throw a rock and hit an HSPA+ 42 coverage area.
This is exactly what turns me off about the galaxy line in the US. I thought maybe they'd change with all the carriers having similar phones now, but no. Ill keep my s3 until its paid off then I'm probably going tontrybsomething else.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
I think it's best to wait for the S4 or another flagship phone.
I pass. You're not getting my money T-Mobile. Cant you just release lte modem for us. Gezzzz
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
x1tyme said:
I pass. You're not getting my money T-Mobile. Cant you just release lte modem for us. Gezzzz
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think its that simple, I believe you need the hardware as well as the modem firmware, just flashing the modem could potentially brick your phone.
I get like 1.6 megs down already. It's more than fast enough.
I think I'm good.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
I'm good with mine. I get almost 20 megs in the dallas metro plex. Tmobile could had the lte turned off like the note 2 and they turn it on when it was available. But they decided to make more money with a new release like the vibrant.
Towle said:
I think I'm good.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get very similar speeds.
No way in he** am I upgrading to the same phone with similar speeds if not worse and more of a battery drain. Very happy where I am at.
Some of ya....well must have money to burn or just don't realize....lol!
Sent from a galaxy far away!
I guess once this phone is released, there needs to be a detailed teardown (anandtech / ifixit) that compares the old T999 with the new T999L.
Hopefully there are no hardware differences, and everything is firmware/rom related.
If there are hardware differences, maybe we can start frankensteining a broken T999L (i.e. cracked screens etc) with a working T999 LOL

[Q] 4G LTE compatibility?

I just saw in Miami that we're getting 4G LTE today and want to know if it's compatible with the T989 s2?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
No. We don't have the right hardware needed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
android88 said:
No. We don't have the right hardware needed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wonder why we have lte settings in network preferred and toggles on some roms? Then if you flash back to a gb rom the secret menu has settings for lte too. Don"t know myself though.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
android88 said:
No. We don't have the right hardware needed.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that sux...so when they say they are bringing it to 200 million people this year it must be people without a contract so they could get a new phone doesn't make sense to me....according to a tmo rep it will be but I don't trust their knowledge....
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
richardlibeau said:
Wonder why we have lte settings in network preferred and toggles on some roms? Then if you flash back to a gb rom the secret menu has settings for lte too. Don"t know myself though.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless Tmo planned for 1.5 years ahead when they launched the Herc, I doubt we have the right hardware. Hopefully it does have support and Tmo did plan for the future but they're keeping it a secret . Because when they build the source for a ROM, they don't take out individual little things for certain devices.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
android88 said:
Unless Tmo planned for 1.5 years ahead when they launched the Herc, I doubt we have the right hardware. Hopefully it does have support and Tmo did plan for the future but they're keeping it a secret . Because when they build the source for a ROM, they don't take out individual little things for certain devices.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess only time will tell.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
richardlibeau said:
I guess only time will tell.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't get your hopes up. I think the S3 and Note 2 are the only ones that are capable at the moment and they will need a software upgrade to unlock it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
richardlibeau said:
Wonder why we have lte settings in network preferred and toggles on some roms? Then if you flash back to a gb rom the secret menu has settings for lte too. Don"t know myself though.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because firmwares are made by Samsung and the skyrocket has lte. The firmwares are designed for simplicity. Meaning, Samsung only has to make one firmware for all variants. That's why that option is there.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
elesbb said:
Because firmwares are made by Samsung and the skyrocket has lte. The firmwares are designed for simplicity. Meaning, Samsung only has to make one firmware for all variants. That's why that option is there.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks didn't know that one. Know alot about phones but didn't think about that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
richardlibeau said:
Thanks didn't know that one. Know alot about phones but didn't think about that.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We all learn something new every day (Thank god or else i'd go bored xD )
corwest said:
Don't get your hopes up. I think the S3 and Note 2 are the only ones that are capable at the moment and they will need a software upgrade to unlock it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually the T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S III (SGH-T999) is NOT capable of it period. I have one. But i did read rumors that they may be making another S3, one with the exact same specs, but adding an LTE capable chip. T-Mobile went on the cheap side with their S3 and used the same chip as the ATT and other variants, but cut out the LTE capabilities. Kinda dumb but hey im not the CEO. lol.
But you are right, the Note 2 just needs a firmware update to enable LTE, also, the only other phone capable of T-Mobile LTE is the Windows Phone 8X.
elesbb said:
Actually the T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S III (SGH-T999) is NOT capable of it period. I have one. But i did read rumors that they may be making another S3, one with the exact same specs, but adding an LTE capable chip. T-Mobile went on the cheap side with their S3 and used the same chip as the ATT and other variants, but cut out the LTE capabilities. Kinda dumb but hey im not the CEO. lol.
But you are right, the Note 2 just needs a firmware update to enable LTE, also, the only other phone capable of T-Mobile LTE is the Windows Phone 8X.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So like I said then it's stupid for T-Mobile to say they are bringing lte to 200 million customers this year when most of them won't be able to use it...I'm under contract till March 2014 so I won't be able to use it till then...that's bs....unless they give me a new phone.....NOT....
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
djtheraven said:
So like I said then it's stupid for T-Mobile to say they are bringing lte to 200 million customers this year when most of them won't be able to use it...I'm under contract till March 2014 so I won't be able to use it till then...that's bs....unless they give me a new phone.....NOT....
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I feel you.. it is bull. But then again neither sprint nor Verizon have existing contracts holders an lte device when they rolled it out. Guess that's just how it goes.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
i dont think the s2 is LTE compatible.

Categories

Resources