Develop Bugs

[KERNEL][014] TripNRaVeR repacked for stock Sense base

I thought it would be great to post TripNRaVeR's CM9 kernels, extracted from his CM9 and repacked into our latest base
This kernel also includes an interesting "lagfree" kernel, use system tuner to try it out
Be sure to thank TripNRaVeR or donate for his work
Kernel source is available on his github
https://github.com/TripNRaVeR
Downloads
- TripNRaVeR Kernel 014 - repacked for Sense 1.29.401.11 ramdisk

TripNRaVeR Kernel 014 - repacked for Sense 1.29.401.11 ramdisk

just in case

xda will not like this :S

vladnosferatu said:
xda will not like this :S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why? franco's mentions him in his kernel and paul obrian get to post his modaco's rom in here
so whats wrong? his work is amazing
if a mod can tell us if this would be allowed, it would be great

I am not supporting Trips work, he does not like to share with the community...

the|gamer said:
I am not supporting Trips work, he does not like to share with the community...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he is sharing on modaco?
what am i missing, anyway lets close this i guess, seems im digging a mess

You are not allowed to post anything from him on xda -.-
As he don't like xda due some reasons and he doesn't share anything.
Btw on which cm9 are you running your one x
... You can press the thanks button, if you like. Makes me happy and motivates to help more people

alright sorry guys i had no idea
a mod can delete this
ill change this title

I dont get that, his work is used in several peoples custom kernels, are they not allowed to?
Also from what I see he publishes his work on git and gives permission for other devs to use it so whats not being shared? Im not arguing to say hey lets allow it just to understand what hes doing/done thats wrong.

Disclaimer:
TripNDroid Mobile Engineering accepts no claims for anything that may happen to youre device because of flashing our software. This is youre own responsibillity.
First, do not use my work without explicit permission! Secondly, XDA doesnt want my work on there "forum" therefore you dont have permission to use my work as a base and then post it on XDA. It will still be my work! Neither you have permission to use my work as a base for MIUI roms and then post it on XDA. None of this is my personal choice, it is XDA that doesnt want my work so obey the rules!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats his opinion.

This kernel work just on cm9 or is compatibile with charmeleon,modaco and revolution rom?
Inviato dal mio HTC One X con Tapatalk 2

Drefsab said:
I dont get that, his work is used in several peoples custom kernels, are they not allowed to?
Also from what I see he publishes his work on git and gives permission for other devs to use it so whats not being shared? Im not arguing to say hey lets allow it just to understand what hes doing/done thats wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel source is available on my github
https://github.com/TripNRaVeR
well he shares his kernel sources now.
but i am not sure if you can do that hamdir.
Best way would be to ask him .

That's kind of my point his works there on git, and I know other dev's have asked for and received permission from him to use parts of his code in their own work.
He clearly is trying to distance himself from what ever the issue was that sparked all this, and is saying don't put his stuff on XDA because they wont like it. It seams to me like he's trying to be part of the overall developer community without antagonising XDA. It doesn't seam like he's doing anything wrong to warrant such a ban, that's this bit I don't understand what happened in the past etc.

XDA and TripNRaVeR have been in a dispute for a while, I think it's best not to post his work on the forum until everything's settled down.
Although it's probably an honest mistake on Hamdir's behalf, but there's a good reason that his work isn't published on XDA.

exactly his quote shows he doesnt mind sharing he just blames it on XDA
the idea behind this thread was to post his kernel repacked + modules to work on sense ROMs
anyway we will need someone from the mods to tell us how to proceed next

I'm not seeing what the problem is, the kernel is accompanied with the source/github.

.
is not necessary change modules??

I think it just don't like to share his ROM. He has made the kernel sources available so others can use it. so I think it's fine.

modules uploaded
now a mod can delete this or lock it, its up to him and xda top guys
no point in this discussing this any further

CM9 RC2 Released for galaxysmtd!

Download link: http://get.cm/get/jenkins/4629/cm-9.0.0-RC2-galaxysmtd.zip
135.99 MB
2012-07-19 08:03:24

Please close the thread since here already have original thread d...thanks
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1592131

I made this thread because that one specifically states NIGHTLY in the title, and this isn't a nightly like the rest of the ROMs in that thread.

Create a thread only for a link... facepalm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

vinay427 said:
I made this thread because that one specifically states NIGHTLY in the title, and this isn't a nightly like the rest of the ROMs in that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should know here is dev ,dun simply put the links only...what is the changelog?can you give a support on it?

If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.

dark_knight35 said:
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't trying to offend anybody here, including any of the CM/SGS devs. If I did, I apologise. I just noticed the link posted on get.cm and decided to create a thread to share the news that it was released, seeing as the other thread (judging from its title) seemingly did not apply to this update. I didn't claim anywhere that I had anything to do with the making of this file, as I obviously didn't, and I don't think your calling me a "worm" is in any way necessary or helpful.
EDIT: Also, someone can close this thread, seeing as it didn't fullfill the purpose I made it for.

vinay427 said:
I wasn't trying to offend anybody here, including any of the CM/SGS devs. If I did, I apologise. I just noticed the link posted on get.cm and decided to create a thread to share the news that it was released, seeing as the other thread (judging from its title) seemingly did not apply to this update. I didn't claim anywhere that I had anything to do with the making of this file, as I obviously didn't, and I don't think your calling me a "worm" is in any way necessary or helpful.
EDIT: Also, someone can close this thread, seeing as it didn't fullfill the purpose I made it for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You *might* post such a topic in the discussion thread. If you don't have something useful in developers' viewpoint, don't post it here, for your safety )

dark_knight35 said:
If pawitp feels in need of such a thread, he will create it. If not, he won't. Not every worm is allowed to create a dev thread to a ROM he didn't build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pawitp will not make the thread i guess. There is a particular 'cyanogenMOD' named account from which all RC build threads are made for all devices.

This is really unnecessary. Any fool knows that in the CM9 toppic also indicated when a release comes out. Close this mess!!!!
Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9000

Thanks. For some reason I was unable to find RC2, even though it was being mentioned in the dev thread. One quick Google brought me here.
Might've been better off posting in General.... this is not dev related.
edit: didn't refresh get.cm, had some old stuff cached It appeared

jelle2503 said:
Thanks. For some reason I was unable to find RC2, even though it was being mentioned in the dev thread. One quick Google brought me here.
Might've been better off posting in General.... this is not dev related.
edit: didn't refresh get.cm, had some old stuff cached It appeared
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder why nobody posted in dev section as RC1 came out....

dark_knight35 said:
I wonder why nobody posted in dev section as RC1 came out....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe because RC1 has never came out?

Thread closed as original thread exists

[Kernel] Repacking

I have repacked Fauxs latest (007u) Kernel for CM10 Alpha 10 and had posted it the official thread for the ROM. But I removed it to stop any complications.
If anybody is looking for it and wanting to try it and use it for this ROM here is the link:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/j93vpoioguvogh0/Endeavoru-Faux123-007u.zip
Hope this helps some people. It's all I planned.
All work is done by Faux and his team. None by me except repacking. I hope this helps!

Wrong forum, mate.

rajitsingh said:
Wrong forum, mate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oops where do I post this then? Thanks for the heads up.

Please, dont create another thread just for one kernel. The forum will get alot of topics if everybody do this. And besides, most of the people over the age of 5 can repack it themself.
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ViperX!

Tingelholm said:
Please, dont create another thread just for one kernel. The forum will get alot of topics if everybody do this. And besides, most of the people over the age of 5 can repack it themself.
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ViperX!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all right can a admin please delete this thread then. Sorry for that...

Roars21 said:
all right can a admin please delete this thread then. Sorry for that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need to be sorry, just so you know the next time.
Sent from my fauxed HOX running ViperX!

[Q] Kernel List

Is there a post listing all the kernels available and what they do, and what was removed. I like the stock kernel for it's media capabilities in playing mkv files with subtitles. I don't want to lose that if I change ROMs that comes with a kernel.
Thanks
Xan Steel

XanSteel said:
Is there a post listing all the kernels available and what they do, and what was removed. I like the stock kernel for it's media capabilities in playing mkv files with subtitles. I don't want to lose that if I change ROMs that comes with a kernel.
Thanks
Xan Steel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No such list exists. As far as I'm aware, here on XDA Roms, Kernels, and mods are so frequently updated that any sort of "comprehensive" list would be outdated before you even finish making it. It's a problem I like having, because it means that we have a LOT of devs that are actively contributing their content on here. I'd much rather have that problem than only having one or two devs who can push updates once a month (I write this as I cry over my Asus Transformer TF101).
That being said, at this time are only a few kernels that are widely used here on XDA. I'll link a couple of them and you can go to each thread individually. I have only really used the "stock" that comes with whatever ROM I'm using. I'm currently trying BMS on LiquidSmooth, but the verdict is still out on whether I like it more than the stock LiquidSmooth kernel.
Anyways, here is my list (in the order that I did the search of):
BMS Kernel (only AOSP 4.2.x Roms)
Ktoonsez' KT747 (TW 4.1, TW 4.1.2, AOSP 4.1, AOSP 4.2) Q&A Thread Here.
ZEUS Kernel [Deviant Development] (TW Roms)
dkp - d2spr & friends (only AOSP 4.2.x Roms)
AGAT's Kernel (TW Roms)
DeviantKernel (TW Roms)
Hellfire Rom (4.2.2 Rom with Hellfire Kernel, couldn't find link to Kernel itself)
The kernel which must not be named. It's a touchy subject here on XDA, so I won't mention the name in this post, but PM me and I might tell you the name of it so you can google search it. I haven't looked for it for a while and don't even know if it's still being developed.
Now, as I said above, this list was created with a simple search and I have not looked through each and every thread. I am obviously not qualified to comment on each kernel's quality/feature-set. But it'd be best to read the OP and the last 3-4 pages of each thread to see what they offer.
Hope this helps your search!
edit. And just a note: All Roms come with a Kernel. If a TW Rom does not state which kernel it's using, it's probably just using the stock one from Samsung (or one they developed themselves). Along the same thread of thought, any AOSP Roms based on CM10.1 will most-likely be using the CM kernel (or their own). What you're asking about is custom kernels that are either included as an option in some Roms (like TPR and MOAR, etc.). These custom kernels are typically built for one of two things: speed or battery life. It's typically stated in the OP what it's built for. I'd say make a nandroid backup and take each one for a test-drive for a couple of days. If you don't like it, nandroid back and try a different one. No harm, no foul. Happy flashing!

Nice list; thanks for taking the time to compile it. much respect bro (hehehe ... sorry i just read the "i like this forum but i don't" post and I couldn't help myself)

I think it's safe to say anthrax, you just can't get it anymore. They pulled the links completely.
Sent from my GS3 running MSG........and Chubbs

Tewlman252 said:
I think it's safe to say anthrax, you just can't get it anymore. They pulled the links completely.
Sent from my GS3 running MSG........and Chubbs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was trying to be a little funny on the Anthrax kernel. Guess I missed the mark, haha.
I know we can't get it on XDA anymore (obviously). Is it still being developed and is it still available on the their website?

topherk said:
I was trying to be a little funny on the Anthrax kernel. Guess I missed the mark, haha.
I know we can't get it on XDA anymore (obviously). Is it still being developed and is it still available on the their website?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I searched it up a couple days ago, and I heard that the links had been pulled because of GPL compliance issues.

1) the links are no longer pulled, and 2)anthrax is definitely my personal favorite

anyone have a link to the 100% stock kernel. Can't seem to find it.
http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb374/TexasEpic/ThePeoplesROM-KennyGlass123/daniel4653.png

Please read forum rules before posting
Questions and help issues go in Q&A
Thread moved
Thank you for your cooperation
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
All kernels are in Original Development subforum

daniel4653 said:
anyone have a link to the 100% stock kernel. Can't seem to find it.
http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb374/TexasEpic/ThePeoplesROM-KennyGlass123/daniel4653.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can take the kernel files (system/lib/modules) out of one of the stock rom zips and put it in the zip of a kernel only zip, that would make you a flashable stock kernel.

jdelano said:
You can take the kernel files (system/lib/modules) out of one of the stock rom zips and put it in the zip of a kernel only zip, that would make you a flashable stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the issue between Anthrax kernel and xda?

Amizzly said:
What is the issue between Anthrax kernel and xda?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is one of those don't ask questions, but it's basically gpl compliance issues
SPRINT GS3 FAQ

Amizzly said:
What is the issue between Anthrax kernel and xda?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, just search up the kernel name + "gpl" on google and theres a ton of stuff on it
---------- Post added at 06:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:00 PM ----------
jdelano said:
You can take the kernel files (system/lib/modules) out of one of the stock rom zips and put it in the zip of a kernel only zip, that would make you a flashable stock kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernels are stored in the boot.img? Or am i misunderstanding something?

Amizzly said:
What is the issue between Anthrax kernel and xda?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Work from banned users are not allowed on XDA.
Also Anthrax source is private as is the website hosting it. XDA to remain GPL compliant requires kernel source to be available.
As mentioned, Google it, join the site and get access to it and the developer as well for support.
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator

kennyglass123 said:
Work from banned users are not allowed on XDA.
Also Anthrax source is private as is the website hosting it. XDA to remain GPL compliant requires kernel source to be available.
As mentioned, Google it, join the site and get access to it and the developer as well for support.
Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's my understanding that his kernel is no longer available on his site either...
SPRINT GS3 FAQ

flastnoles11 said:
It's my understanding that his kernel is no longer available on his site either...
SPRINT GS3 FAQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a quick Google of the kernel name or his name + GPL will show you why. In short he's in a legal dispute over GPL compliance with the actual GPL compliance people.
☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆
I like to break stuff!

-EViL-KoNCEPTz- said:
It's not a quick Google of the kernel name or his name + GPL will show you why. In short he's in a legal dispute over GPL compliance with the actual GPL compliance people.
☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆
I like to break stuff!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, I read all the gpl complaints as they were coming, I'm on the mailing list... lol... it's a shame to cuz it was an excellent kernel
SPRINT GS3 FAQ

flastnoles11 said:
Yep, I read all the gpl complaints as they were coming, I'm on the mailing list... lol... it's a shame to cuz it was an excellent kernel
SPRINT GS3 FAQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Being GPL compliant is a big deal. It's one reason I have never released any of my kernels. Some of the stuff I haven't been able to completely track back to the original source and some stuff I'm not even sure where it came from since it was hand me down modified source from other people I've lost contact with. Sometimes I'm just too disorganized to make sure I have my ass covered. With my real job I can't risk even having an allegation of doing something wrong.
☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆
I like to break stuff!

CNexus said:
Kernels are stored in the boot.img? Or am i misunderstanding something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no I don't think so, I just looked at what folders/files a zip contains that only flashes a kernel.
So what I've done before is copy that folder from the ROM zip to get me back to the kernel the ROM came with. This is what I was suggesting to them

That's a really good idea. I can't believe I never thought of that myself. Kudos. I'll be using this in the past (I had always restored a nandroid backup, which Adel might be a good idea). But in the future, I'm going to look at what's being installed and do a little investigation. Should be fun and informative!
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app

devs complete this kernel

Hello friends
i am uploading the boot.img of stock kernel 2.6.35 i want the other files which are required to make a flashable .zip kernel
please provide requried files and make a zip and post to me
please i request u all

You don't order devs to make something for you.
Also please stop spammimg the development thread, your topics are not development related rather q/a threads
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]

abhishekr700 said:
Hello friends
i am uploading the boot.img of stock kernel 2.6.35 i want the other files which are required to make a flashable .zip kernel
please provide requried files and make a zip and post to me
please i request u all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:highfive:

ronnieryan said:
You are a JOKE:highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you're an RC who should be trying to help people, not make fun of them.
Edit: OP, link to source code is needed if you upload a kernel

Jonny said:
And you're an RC who should be trying to help people, not make fun of them.
Edit: OP, link to source code is needed if you upload a kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry for that, im just not in a good mood today, things happened, anyhow what he uploaded is stock kernel pulled from stock rom and he is ordering people around to test the flashable zip that he made if it works

deathnotice01 said:
You don't order devs to make something for you.
Also please stop spammimg the development thread, your topics are not development related rather q/a threads
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again

abhishekr700 said:
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is again so rude...

abhishekr700 said:
come on i am not ordering
i think u did not read the please word read the post again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you need to post the source code... #justsayin

Jonny said:
I think you need to post the source code... #justsayin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360

fifa2151 said:
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
definitely and Jonny asking for a source code is awkward, since the source is from samsung website and sammys source cannot even boot when not modded

ronnieryan said:
sorry for that, im just not in a good mood today, things happened, anyhow what he uploaded is stock kernel pulled from stock rom and he is ordering people around to test the flashable zip that he made if it works
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but i am not forcing you to test that okk

agosain7 said:
This is again so rude...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no it isnt

fifa2151 said:
He dint done anything i think
He had backed up a stock kernel and posted
Sent from my GT-S5360
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes i wrote it in description that this is just stock kernel which was backuped mby a method i got from a website
and i am asking someone to test it

I am exhausted closing the thread
Hello everyone
because of all the negative replies i have got in here i am closing the thread

abhishekr700 said:
yes i wrote it in description that this is just stock kernel which was backuped mby a method i got from a website
and i am asking someone to test it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
abhishekr700 said:
Hello everyone
because of all the negative replies i have got in here i am closing the thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let me explain to you why u got so many negative feedback,
1. you posted on development section a backup of a stock kernel (what were u developing?)
2. you want devs to test a stock kernel? (what for?) you have stock kernel when u bought the phone?
3. if you want anyone to test a kernel, you should also upload the source(if it was a custom kernel)
4. You spammed development section by posting a thread which only contains boot.img and the other with your so called flashable zip
5. you act so RUDE, as if you are ordering people around here(what you are trying to do is very3 ancient news, use search button?)
6. you should have searched before doing all the actions above..there were kernel flashers by mai77 method or by faqbly method, and you can get stock boot.img by going to dokys stock ROMs to be flashed via odin,
7. DONT SPAM every reply, there is a button called multi quote
(DONT FEEL BAD, XDA IS A VERY WELCOMING PLACE)
[JUST KNOW YOUR PLACE AND DONT ACT SO RUDE]

ronnieryan said:
let me explain to you why u got so many negative feedback,
1. you posted on development section a backup of a stock kernel (what were u developing?)
2. you want devs to test a stock kernel? (what for?) you have stock kernel when u bought the phone?
3. if you want anyone to test a kernel, you should also upload the source(if it was a custom kernel)
4. You spammed development section by posting a thread which only contains boot.img and the other with your so called flashable zip
5. you act so RUDE, as if you are ordering people around here(what you are trying to do is very3 ancient news, use search button?)
6. you should have searched before doing all the actions above..there were kernel flashers by mai77 method or by faqbly method, and you can get stock boot.img by going to dokys stock ROMs to be flashed via odin,
7. DONT SPAM every reply, there is a button called multi quote
(DONT FEEL BAD, XDA IS A VERY WELCOMING PLACE)
[JUST KNOW YOUR PLACE AND DONT ACT SO RUDE]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey ronnie iam sorry
thanx for telling me about my mistakes
i will remember these in future

Even if you post a stock kernel binary, still needs source or a link to the source (ie, opensource.samsung)...
As for it not booting, that's Samsung's problem

Jonny said:
Even if you post a stock kernel binary, still needs source or a link to the source (ie, opensource.samsung)...
As for it not booting, that's Samsung's problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man you are high these days!! Leave the kernel devs here
Go loiter somewhere else