This kernel is based off dreamcwli's kernel here with some added features!
So anything in his kernel will also be in this one.
Source Code:
My source(github) can be found here: https://github.com/The-Captain/android_kernel_moto_wingray
Features:
Rooted Access (of course!)
USB OTG support
Overclock to 1.7
ADB Support
Various Governors & Schedulers
Governors:
Lagfree
DanceDance (Thanks Snuzzo!)
SmartassV2 (Thanks Erasmux!)
Interactive
Conservative
OnDemandX
Powersave
Performance
What is the difference between these governors?
Lagfree:
Instantly goes to a specific CPU frequency immediately after the device wakes, after which it runs close to Conservative. It has been noted, however, as being slow to change frequencies.
DanceDance:
Based on conservative, but with higher ramp rates and better sleep.
SmartassV2:
A rewrite of Smartass, scales down quickly similar to Conservative. But will ramp up quickly as well.
Interactive:
Quick to ramp up to the maximum frequency, but slowly drops the frequency once it is no longer needed.
Conservative:
Slow to ramp up to the maximum frequency, but fast to drop the frequency once no longer needed.
OnDemandX:
An update of OnDemand, it quickly scales up the frequency when needed, but also quickly scales down the frequency when no longer needed.
Powersave:
Forces the CPU to run at the lowest allowed frequency always.
Performance:
The opposite of Powersave, it sets it to the maximum allowed frequency at all times.
Get more information on these here - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1989824
Schedulers:
Noop
Deadline
CFQ
SIO
ROW
What is the difference between these schedulers?
I recommend you read up on these if you want here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1989824
Only one not listed is ROW:
ROW stands for read-over-write. Which is better optimized for devices using flash memory and not hard drives.
What ROMs does this work with?
My Android 4.2 (Was built for this - Recommended)
BlackBean7
Eos 4
May work with other ROMs too, just not CM, has to be AOSP based. Be sure to backup before testing!
Download:
http://d-h.st/AyN
Mirror:
http://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=9390288116658473312
NOTE: I am not responsible for what you do to your device. You and you alone are responsible.
Instructions:
Get the latest download of "My Android 4.2 for Xoom Wi-Fi and gapps"
Download the ShieldKernel above this.
Boot into Recovery.
Wipe
Flash my_wingray zip file first
Then flash shieldkernelV2.zip
NOTE: If you are already running My Android 4.2, just flash the shieldkernel zip over it, you should be fine without wiping.
Credits:
dreamcwli (for bringing us 4.2.1 and the kernel I used as a base to make mine)
Snuzzo (for answering all my questions)
wildstang83 (for helping me when needed)
All those who contributed to making the kernel that I don't know!
Changelog:
Code:
[B]V2[/B][QUOTE][URL="https://github.com/The-Captain/android_kernel_moto_wingray/commit/e9318405a0ce302b60d8c4bad940b40596767534"]Added Lagfree Governor[/URL][/QUOTE]
[B]V1[/B][QUOTE]Initial Release
Added [URL="https://github.com/The-Captain/android_kernel_moto_wingray/commit/f0cf4acab881ed0be6518eeebe04afa53650bccf"]DanceDance[/URL], [URL="https://github.com/The-Captain/android_kernel_moto_wingray/commit/8f9d36e12f28f5e597423e8f2180b5bd8773a5c4"]SmartassV2[/URL], [URL="https://github.com/The-Captain/android_kernel_moto_wingray/commit/f019aa01a4aa1e21e3c629b782b332e1801efe96"]OnDemandX governors[/URL], and enable a couple others.
Added [URL="https://github.com/The-Captain/android_kernel_moto_wingray/commit/4050539d931779d9063e3ff222a7a1e0909a4953"]ROW scheduler[/URL] and enabled several others.[/QUOTE]
Reserved, just encase!
First!
Very excited to see you got this going. You been working on it long enough.
Saweeeeet!!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
AWESOME!!!!
cool!! can you make one for the 3g mz601 Version that is compatible to eos? or just 3g mz601 i would change to your rom
Subbed in case of any questions with my governor. Good job man. I like it.
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
5nickers said:
cool!! can you make one for the 3g mz601 Version that is compatible to eos? or just 3g mz601 i would change to your rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may expand it to other variations of the Xoom later, but for right now I'm gonna stick with just the Xoom WiFi running My Android. Sorry
You actually describe the schedulers and governors in you're kernel? Yes, you win. Can you develop everyone else's kernels too? Lol
Seriously though its awesome to see somebody doing kernel work on our old baby. Will this work on other 4.2 roms, though? I actually prefer My Android but I am nevertheless curious.
Supercutetom said:
You actually describe the schedulers and governors in you're kernel? Yes, you win. Can you develop everyone else's kernels too? Lol
Seriously though its awesome to see somebody doing kernel work on our old baby. Will this work on other 4.2 roms, though? I actually prefer My Android but I am nevertheless curious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, as far as the other 4.2 roms, unfortunately no. CM uses a special kernel as far as I know. Maybe that can be worked on in the future. I use My Android since I prefer the stock feel, just wanted some more options when it came to governors and schedulers.
anyone even attempt flashing this on a diff rom.?
Sent from my XOOM XOOM XOOM in ya boom boom!!!
This kernel is based on pure AOSP kernel and likely will not work on CM, AOKP or other similarly based roms. Generally, CM and AOSP kernels just don't mix. This compatibility issue could be worked out in the future. For now just use it as intended and everyone is happy
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Supercutetom said:
You actually describe the schedulers and governors in you're kernel? Yes, you win. Can you develop everyone else's kernels too? Lol
Seriously though its awesome to see somebody doing kernel work on our old baby. Will this work on other 4.2 roms, though? I actually prefer My Android but I am nevertheless curious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using it with BlackBean7 and it works great. Whether related or not, the only issues I've had with the ROM were bluetooth connectivity, and after flashing ShiledKernel, my BT problems were solved. Battery life with the combo has been incredible thus far. You shouldn't have much problem running on ROMs other than My Android based on this I would think.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2
anyone flash this for eos4? just curious
How's DanceDance treating you guys so far?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
Snuzzo said:
How's DanceDance treating you guys so far?
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any scheduler named DanceDance has got to be the best scheduler ever, haha. You do good work snuzzo. Thanks for helping out
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
I have created a new section with tested and proven to work ROMs in the OP.
grey.ghost said:
I'm using it with BlackBean7 and it works great. Whether related or not, the only issues I've had with the ROM were bluetooth connectivity, and after flashing ShiledKernel, my BT problems were solved. Battery life with the combo has been incredible thus far. You shouldn't have much problem running on ROMs other than My Android based on this I would think.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad it's working for you! Be sure to try out the DanceDance governor!
alex94kumar said:
anyone flash this for eos4? just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hasn't been tested yet, I don't know what that is based off, or much about it TBH. If you decide to test it though backup first and please post here to let me know so I can add it to the what the kernel works with list.
New "update" in OP, all that is changed is Lagfree governor has been added though.
Works in Eos 4.
Noticeable difference on Dreamcwli's rom, with and without ShieldKernel. First image is WITH ShieldKernel, on performance at 1504, second is without, also on performance at 1504.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Related
This is my compilation of Antutu Benchmarks...I've done many others so expect more.
- All ROMS benchmarked at 768MHz except stock V...set to Airplane mode except Sun Spider
- Ran 3 of each benchmark...I never ran them after each other so no caching.
- Swap partitioned to 128Mb/512Mb fs .... I've shown that partitioning doesn't matter in my other post (check below)
- Phones only used the benching programs & a screenshot app
This took awhile, probably greater than 2 weeks as I restarted again and again when I found better ways to set up the phone, but I like to see actual numbers to back up reasoning...more to come!!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Swap size benchmark comparison
Here's my swap size experiment. Hope it answers just one persons thoughts on swap size.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1105503
Newb here, where can I find Zerfies CM7? Did a forum search and I'm not seeing it. TIA
Thomas S said:
Newb here, where can I find Zerfies CM7? Did a forum search and I'm not seeing it. TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Over at android central under optimus s
Sent from my LG-VM670 using XDA Premium App
smokenbiskits said:
Here's my swap size experiment. Hope it answers just one persons thoughts on swap size.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1105503
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is benchmarks really that important does it have real world usage?
Sent from my LG-VM670 using XDA Premium App
vegetajin8 said:
Over at android central under optimus s
Sent from my LG-VM670 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What issues might pop up when using a ROM for an Optimus S phone instead of our Optimus V? I know the buttons are swapped. Anything else?
482123 said:
What issues might pop up when using a ROM for an Optimus S phone instead of our Optimus V? I know the buttons are swapped. Anything else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a sticky at android central from mmarz in the optimus v section that will explain how to port an s rom to the v.
Sent from my VM670 using XDA Premium App
it's a comparative analysis, if it's better in benchmarks then it will generally run faster in real life
That is really cool to see ^.^
Thanks !!!!
Thomas S said:
Newb here, where can I find Zerfies CM7? Did a forum search and I'm not seeing it. TIA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't want that. Better off getting aospCMod.
Hey what filesystem are you using when doing these benchmarks? Also on the stock ROM benchmark on quadrant advanced, are you using the stock unrooted kernel? because I have a stock unrooted v that has never had anything flashed to it and im getting like 480's.
Unreliable
You can't judge a phone when it comes to anything based off of CM7. CM7's stage fright is unstable and basically, skips some of the initial tests and marks them as completed. This causes highly inflated scores. All the 2.2 or non CM7 based ROM's will post more accurate and relevant scores. I have tried almost all of these ROM's and Bumble Bee is the winner for me. Off of real performance speeds, not Quadrant Scores..
nikeman513 said:
You can't judge a phone when it comes to anything based off of CM7. CM7's stage fright is unstable and basically, skips some of the initial tests and marks them as completed. This causes highly inflated scores. All the 2.2 or non CM7 based ROM's will post more accurate and relevant scores. I have tried almost all of these ROM's and Bumble Bee is the winner for me. Off of real performance speeds, not Quadrant Scores..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but that only applies to benchmarks that use stagefright enabled tests, such as Quadrant. He ran his tests on several different benchmarking tools. Besides, we all know benchmarks don't matter, right?
nikeman513 said:
You can't judge a phone when it comes to anything based off of CM7. CM7's stage fright is unstable and basically, skips some of the initial tests and marks them as completed. This causes highly inflated scores. All the 2.2 or non CM7 based ROM's will post more accurate and relevant scores. I have tried almost all of these ROM's and Bumble Bee is the winner for me. Off of real performance speeds, not Quadrant Scores..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I seem to have better performance out of cm7. I play crusade of destiny every now and then. It lags a bit on bumblebee and other 2.2 rpm's, but its pretty smooth on cm7.
Sent from my VM670 using tapatalk
thank you so much for doing this work man. This is exactly the kind of critical information that a newer user like me needs. In fact I consider this one of the more critically important posts / collection of data that I have come across in my searches for the ROM that will best fit my needs.
I've been torn between a few ROM's (Stock V, Harmonia, Bumblee, Gingerbread based ROM) and this data you've provided will allow me to pick a ROM based on 1) the features I think I will need 2) it's performance level relative to other ROM's.
That's not to say some developers might not leapfrog each other in performance, but it gives me a good idea of who is on a path that I also wanna walk on. And right now that's looking like Harmonia to me (maybe Bumblebee as a trial). But I LOVE the absolutely stripped down nature of Harmonia 1.3.1 on my LG OV.
again, thank you so much for this info.
Interesting. I'd love to see you test Jerry's or KemikalElite's ROMs. On a straight IHO build ondemand @ 245-729MHz I'm getting into the 1500s on AnTuTu, low 900s on Quadrant[1], high 9s on Linpack single threaded.
1: Quadrant seems to be rather dependent upon minimum CPU speed here, as bumping that up a bit got me into the 1100s.
Quadrant scores should be completely thrown out. It's easy to optimize code for the benchmark. Acer released an official patch that did just that for some of their Android phones.
Smartbench may be a better choice. I also would like to see one of the I.H.O. builds tested against the other ROMs.
Vishwar said:
You don't want that. Better off getting aospCMod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why doesn't he want that I was thinking about getting the same 1
Sent from my LG-VM670 using XDA Premium App
cjtulowiecki said:
Why doesn't he want that I was thinking about getting the same 1
Sent from my LG-VM670 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At this point no one should be downloading AOSP due to its lack of support and general lack of being a good ROM. Bumblebee (2.2, most stable, super fast, great battery life, etc, but stock), Harmonia (2.2 with a lil more features), Ath3nos (most stable 2.3/CM7 so far) and Inferior Human Organs (2.3, CM7.1, still some issues but wide open source, actual bug logging, etc.)
DustbinK said:
At this point no one should be downloading AOSP due to its lack of support and general lack of being a good ROM. Bumblebee (2.2, most stable, super fast, great battery life, etc, but stock), Harmonia (2.2 with a lil more features), Ath3nos (most stable 2.3/CM7 so far) and Inferior Human Organs (2.3, CM7.1, still some issues but wide open source, actual bug logging, etc.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with most of this, except whether Ath3nos is most stable, it's based on an earlier source of IHO, and IHO had a lot more fixes since then. I haven't had any issues with IHO (except the documented ones already, a shrinking list), maybe because it's better documented it seems easier to pick at the details. It should be THE Gingerbread/CM7.1 to use for Optimus V right now.
AOSP Kernels for HTC's 8x50, 7x30, and 8x60 Devices
Also available for the Motorola Xoom
Tiamat kernels are designed for use on all ROMs that are built from the AOSP source code. This includes ROMs built from MIUI, CyanogenMod, and others.
Tiamat receives no support for use with ROMs based on HTC's Sense - use at your own risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tiamat Kernels
You can find full details about Tiamat Kernels at our website. The site is up and running and serves as a more centralized location to get updates, downloads, and changelogs for all Tiamat Kernels. There is no forum or Registration, it’s just a more convenient way to keep things organized as we work to add support for more devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Support
Join the Tiamat Kernel developers on IRC at irc.freenode.net, #tiamat. Support and questions are generally handled faster there than the forums. You can easily join via webchat here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Special Thanks to:
toastcfh, slayher and the CyanogenMod team for the base kernels and everything else they do for the Android community
bcnice20 for generally being awesome
TeamWin for also generally being awesome
netarchy, chad0989, cuviper, and invisiblek for some great code
intersectRaven and redstar3894 for the Mjolnir compiler
JasonK75 for updating threads
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quick Links
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8x50 Changelog
8x60 Changelog
7x30 Changelog
Downloads
FAQ
Source Code
yesssss
this is what i needed to make my MIUI complete
thank you!!!!
What's special about this kernel
sent from an under rated phone
knipp21 said:
What's special about this kernel
sent from an under rated phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for one.. im pretty confident all audio issues ive had with MIUI will now be fixed. i had very very similar issues with my og dinc and after flashing tmt's series those were all fixed.
also if im not mistaken..i believe smartass and oc have been optimized.
i mean im not 100% sure..its just what i remembered from my original encounter with it.
Could this be used on the Incredibly Debloated ROM?
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
Says it won't work with sense, if someone tries it with a sense rom and it works let us know please.
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
devator22 said:
Says it won't work with sense, if someone tries it with a sense rom and it works let us know please.
Sent from my ADR6350 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wouldnt recommend that.
the do's and do nots are there for a reason.
most likely whatll happen is ull see random reboots and a serious battery drain.
SoCalSpecialist said:
i wouldnt recommend that.
the do's and do nots are there for a reason.
most likely whatll happen is ull see random reboots and a serious battery drain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct. It will not work as they have different ramdisk structures. That's why kernels are tagged AOSP or Sense. There have been a few exceptions in the past that have been compatible with both (I've only seen them for Inc 1 though). Also I believe this is a gingerbread only kernel.
backing up and throwing this on the cm7 nigthly... crosses fingers...
Interested to see if this fix's the Audio issue. Then it would get me to come back to MIUI and load this kernel..to many sound issues for me for now.
so far so good on cm7, haven't tried voice calls yet though to test volumes
clock choices are amazing.. must be 20 of them. ranging from 192mhz to 2035mhz. Don't think i'll be pushing my luck above 1300-1400mhz though
SoCalSpecialist said:
for one.. im pretty confident all audio issues ive had with MIUI will now be fixed. i had very very similar issues with my og dinc and after flashing tmt's series those were all fixed.
also if im not mistaken..i believe smartass and oc have been optimized.
i mean im not 100% sure..its just what i remembered from my original encounter with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok cool ill be using it. I love the smart ass gov and its got more frequencies
Has anyone stress tested our phone to see how high is safe? I have a feeling this processor is really strong. I love my single core that goes higher than the dual core!
sent from an under rated phone
Coming over from JDkernel that I just Flashed! This Is What I Was looking For!!!
_________________
Current: HTC Droid Incredible 2 (S-OFF, CyanogenMod7.1.0 Beta 1), HTC Aria (S-OFF, Cyanogenmod7.1.0-RC1-Liberty)
Previous: BB 8330, Moto Q9c
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
damn this must be pretty well known as a really good kernel.. i was using JDkernel and really happy but gonna have to check this out from a lot of your responses
just loaded this up made a test call.. the volume issue is fixed!!
this also fixed the crashing issue for miui music
I lied...just froze on me.
sent from an under rated phone
*edit* The call volume issue is indeed fixed
No issues so far, running it on OMFGB rom, froze setcpu so I could let the kernel at stock clock + the smartass governor do it's thing and see just how far I can squeeze the battery. So far I'm very impressed with this kernel.
If you're like me and have been endlessly flashing between CM7, MIUI, OMGB and OMFGB, Rmk's sense, etc and especially if you have tried other kernels, I'd highly recommend you wipe your battery stats after flashing this. I was a little worried after I first flashed it as I was draining pretty fast (not the fault of the kernel, just have to clean up after a shameless tweak like me gets a hold of something) but I wiped the stats and all systems are go now
One question I have is about the SBC feature mentioned on the FAQ on tiamat website. Is this included in this kernel and if so is it possible to turn it off somehow? I know its included for the Inc and evo - both probably because of the charging issue which the inc2 also has. So wondering if this was included for this kernel. Thanks again. Other than that its running nice and smooth. Hope to run it through the courses to see battery life differences if any
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk
OK, so I came from the droid 2, where we didn't have kernels. So noob question incoming.
Does the kernel itself have settings, or would I use setcpu?
If the settings are built in, how do I get to them/change them?
Sent from somewhere over the double rainbow.
Things like clock speed and governor can be controlled through setCPU or the built in performance settings of cyanogenmod. Undervolting is built into some kernels, but I don't think there's a tool for customizing voltages on the incredible 2 yet.
Post up your AnTuTu Benchmark scores! Please only post up screenshots for verification purposes.
Thanks to you zedomax! I am running just his kernel, without a custom ROM on top, and I love this thing. It is rock stable at 1.6GHz.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this sure looks like, at least for now, I am the highest score on AnTuTu with an E4GT. Am I right?
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
pwnt
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock kernel FTW
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
viperROM (LoStKernel Exp) with 1.6Ghz OC & GPU OC.
Just imagine if we could get the 60fps cap off our phones
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
ahl395 said:
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Sid 6.7 said:
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is an E4GT.
R1ptide said:
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Mine is an E4GT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Sid 6.7 said:
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't trust any kernel that isn't based off of stock pulled at this point. I have social hub, media hub, and all the drm apps frozen. I think I have the odexed nociq mod but that might've gone away when I had to revert to a nandroid backup not sure. Don't use a live wallpaper.. That's about all I can think of really. Every phone is different so we could have the exact same setup and get different scores.
stangdriverdoug said:
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you serious?
If you are press home and power at the same time
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I got this
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
This is the best I can do...
Samsung Galaxy S II
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Not to bad!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
trying to break 7800
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
lse4 said:
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the stock kernel and stock launcher so I don't know really
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
JoeBruin32 said:
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same setup... 1.6GHz max, performance gov, calkulin's rom, lost kernel 1.0.0.8. got similar score in 5900 range. then I flashed zedomax 6.02, same story... something in calkulin's rom isnt liking our overclocking.
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
R1ptide said:
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you recommending chris' stock pulled repacked with cwm, or his eg30plus?
edit: not even breaking 5400 on stock + tegrak @ 1.452
Hey, guys.
Recently, the GLaDOS Kernel -> overclock problem solving have been.
so, i'm glados control app -> overclock conducted.
my galaxy nexus -> max overclock : 1.8Ghz.
2.1Ghz Is possible.
But do not last long.
I'd like to suggest to you.
glados kerenl is very good. the best kernel.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Just recently flashed glados for the first time and loving it
Hi,
Like I said on RootzW you're the first!
It's crazy and congratulations for the higher CPU frequency I'v seen for a Gnex
Yes this kernel+the app are awesome!
You should specify that it is with Smartreflex disable and all device can't handle these high frequencies...
It will take me to begin to test above my "little" 1.63Ghz...
This kernel is a beast...and your phone also
junha.lee.32 said:
Hey, guys.
Recently, the GLaDOS Kernel -> overclock problem solving have been.
so, i'm glados control app -> overclock conducted.
my galaxy nexus -> max overclock : 1.8Ghz.
2.1Ghz Is possible.
But do not last long.
I'd like to suggest to you.
glados kerenl is very good. the best kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GLaDOS has been amazing for me everyone talks about this kernel and that kernel but none compare to the advances in GLaDOS imo it stands alone at the top of the pack. Ezekeel is a great developer his work and devotion to the Galaxy Nexus and his GLaDOS kernel is second to none. Congrats on the 2.1 GHz
blowtorch said:
GLaDOS has been amazing for me everyone talks about this kernel and that kernel but none compare to the advances in GLaDOS imo it stands alone at the top of the pack. Ezekeel is a great developer his work and devotion to the Galaxy Nexus and his GLaDOS kernel is second to none. Congrats on the 2.1 GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks ~
Will have to agree with all comments here on GladOS. I've been running it since rooting my GNex, and it's been rock solid stable, fast, and the battery life is awesome using Wheatley. Ezekeel is a great dev, and definitely deserves some more limelight.
My phone crashes at 1.6 which is the highest setting on the cdma version (I don't have the glados app yet)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Dictate said:
Will have to agree with all comments here on GladOS. I've been running it since rooting my GNex, and it's been rock solid stable, fast, and the battery life is awesome using Wheatley. Ezekeel is a great dev, and definitely deserves some more limelight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with that
Anthonok said:
My phone crashes at 1.6 which is the highest setting on the cdma version (I don't have the glados app yet)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the current version does not work properly.
To rise to 1.6Ghz,
as follows:
Create init.d tweak.
------------------------------
# SmartReflex
echo "0" > /sys/kernel/debug/smartreflex/sr_mpu/autocomp
echo "0" > /sys/kernel/debug/smartreflex/sr_core/autocomp
echo "0" > /sys/kernel/debug/smartreflex/sr_iva/autocomp
#default 1
------------------------------
This [viking37], and found, [phone_user] was created.
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/14685-15-apr-glados-v129/page__st__840
today, antutu benchmark measurement.
my galaxy nexus put in the freezer measurement.
Temperature: 11 degrees.
How are you?
Re,
Yeah!!!!
You can post your score here:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443343&highlight=benchmark
What governor?
Min CPU freq?
CPU temp limit?
Also thanks to the freezer
viking37 said:
Re,
Yeah!!!!
You can post your score here:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443343&highlight=benchmark
What governor?
Min CPU freq?
CPU temp limit?
Also thanks to the freezer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you!
not damaged?
wow..
wow... very nice... my S2 max clock is 1600Mhz...amazing..
Gonna try out Glados right now!
U did an amazing work... I like it.. keep moving on this track..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Remember when the platform was sliding into the fire pit and I said "Goodbye", and you were like, [deep voice] "No way!" And then I was all, "We pretended we were going to murder you." That was great.
junha.lee.32 said:
Hey, guys.
Recently, the GLaDOS Kernel -> overclock problem solving have been.
so, i'm glados control app -> overclock conducted.
my galaxy nexus -> max overclock : 1.8Ghz.
2.1Ghz Is possible.
But do not last long.
I'd like to suggest to you.
glados kerenl is very good. the best kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Task killer
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I was surprised at develoid.
In my phone freeze happens 1.65Ghz
reached 1920 mhz cpu oc without problems!at 2.1 freeze all...at 2 ghz freeze when benchmarked..very good find,also if in normal situation 1400 goes well,without go with higher mhz.but for a flashaolic extreeme overclocker like me it's the best to see that with smartreflex disabled with liveoc i can reach same oc step that htc devices with quallcomm cpu.gnex and omap4 rocks!
Hi guys,
Following the development of CM11 for the Defy(+) by @Quarx, I decided to share the evolution of performance "Nightly".
The results were obtained from the average of 3 tests for each "Nightly", using two app for measuring performance: Quadrant and AnTuTu.
Configuration for testing:
CM11 Nightly (by @Quarx)
Defy+ (MB526)
CPU (OC): 300/20 600/35 900/50 1200/64
CPU (SC): 300/33 600/48 800/58 1000/62
Governor: Interactive
I/O: Deadline
Installation conditions: No clean install (version over version)
TWRP > Advanced Wipe > Dalvik Cache/Cache
Install > Nightly/GApps > Wipe Cache/Dalvik > Reboot System
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Added test on SC (Stock Clock) at the request of @Blechd0se
* Random reboots occurred frequently in the early versions. For me no longer occurs since version 2014.01.24 (except version 2014.01.28, very problematic);
* Crashes occur on Google Search (maybe because I'm using GEL) and Aero Control in the first 4-5 reboots (it seems necessary to stabilize the unclean installs). After, no more crashes!
* @Quarx and @Blechd0se, the greatest variability between consecutive tests in both apps is about IO (reaching 40-60%), by showing up unstable;
BUG @Quarx (and @okij):
Camera: auto-focus doesn't work using size 3.7M (best aspect ratio - the same of screen);
Shortcuts from Apps moved to SD card disappear after reboot;
Battery Drain: 2014.02.08, 2014.02.09, 2014.02.10, 2014.02.11, 2014.02.12;
Battery charge bugs: 2014.02.18, 2014.02.19, 2014.02.20;
Additonal information:
_ Development-related forum (here);
_ Short Path to clean install (here);
_ Bug list by @okij (here);
_ CM11 by @Quarx (here);
_ BaNkS GApps (here) - use only Banks Minimal GApps;
_ For those interested, following link GEL (Google Experience Launcher);
Special thanks for the improvements in the kernel obtained by @Blechd0se!
Sorry for my bad english
Awesome work, keep with this !
Add
All tests were done with my device using all applications for daily use (added to BaNkS GApps, amounted 159 Apps), connected with the following services: Wi-Fi, Location, 2G/3G and Sync.
good:
Welcome @Saturnal here on xda and thanks for this nice debut, well done! If possible, update your thread (preferably the opening post) when new nightlies are released.
I just announced your thread here on the CM11 development thread, because many users are mainly reading the dev thread and I think that your thread deserves some attention.
Great work, keep up!
Could you provide some subjective experiance about less measurable performance as well? I think the most interesting and important would be wake up time during calls (for me at least). In this manner it seems to be worse over time on my device (I also don't do clean installs).
Great work! For reference I Can aport my numbers in antutu I get 4789 with a Defy Red lens in the last CM10.2
Thanks for the info! It is nice interesting to see the difference between the builds (and between the effect on the different benchmark-types).
How precisely does it make sense to compare these numbers with benchmarks on other Defy's with other installed apps?
If meaningful, I might do a benchmark of my own Defy.
I ask this because I find my Defy on Wiui to bug/crash/slow down a bit too much lately (after a few months of using it) and therefore I'm thinking of trying another ROM. As I read that Kitkat in general was lighter on RAM-usage, I tought of looking at that direction. (I'm not that interested in the latest GUI etc., rather looking for stability, efficiency and performance.)
Very interesting. For what it is worth, I get AnTuTu score 4893 with 0126, and a score of 5074 with 0205 nightly. The phone is overclocked to 1200 MHz.
okij said:
Welcome @Saturnal here on xda and thanks for this nice debut, well done! If possible, update your thread (preferably the opening post) when new nightlies are released.
I just announced your thread here on the CM11 development thread, because many users are mainly reading the dev thread and I think that your thread deserves some attention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks @okij and everyone, I'll update today.:good: Yesterday I had many problems to connect to the forum.
NPeete said:
Great work, keep up!
Could you provide some subjective experiance about less measurable performance as well? I think the most interesting and important would be wake up time during calls (for me at least). In this manner it seems to be worse over time on my device (I also don't do clean installs).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure! Is fairly smooth transition of screens (I'm using GEL). Keeps bug #31 (screen is half blacked out while getting incoming calls) and #26 (screen needs about 5 seconds to wakeup when a call is receive). Crashes occur on Google Search (maybe because GEL) and Aero Control in the first 4-5 reboots (it seems necessary to stabilize the unclean installs).
Johan_V said:
Very interesting. For what it is worth, I get AnTuTu score 4893 with 0126, and a score of 5074 with 0205 nightly. The phone is overclocked to 1200 MHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but it's clear that I posted averages between 3 tests, so got higher values than those shown in the chart Moreover, different test conditions lead to different values.
:good:Keep doing tests and posting to help all users with more references!
bblubb said:
Thanks for the info! It is nice interesting to see the difference between the builds (and between the effect on the different benchmark-types).
How precisely does it make sense to compare these numbers with benchmarks on other Defy's with other installed apps?
If meaningful, I might do a benchmark of my own Defy.
I ask this because I find my Defy on Wiui to bug/crash/slow down a bit too much lately (after a few months of using it) and therefore I'm thinking of trying another ROM. As I read that Kitkat in general was lighter on RAM-usage, I tought of looking at that direction. (I'm not that interested in the latest GUI etc., rather looking for stability, efficiency and performance.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes sense to analyze the variation of the benchmarks on the same device in pre-established conditions. So we can see which version is more optimized for use!
If you think about changing ROM, I strongly recommend CM11 by @ Quarx!:good:
BadFranch said:
Great work! For reference I Can aport my numbers in antutu I get 4789 with a Defy Red lens in the last CM10.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have got 4853 (AnTuTu) and 1962 (Quadrant), but only posted the averages. Maybe it's time you experience the CM11!
Sent from my Defy+
Saturnal said:
View attachment 2561658
Sent from my Defy+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have red lense Defy with GB kernel and latest CM7. No OC, 1000mhz
Antutu score 3900.
Now what is interesting is that you have everything better exceptdatabase I/O. I have 360 and you 215. Hm, Storage I/O is again on your side and nearly double. Mine 425 against your 922+. What is holding down CM11 in this department I wonder.
It is interesting how much results differ. With 0205 nightly I now get consistently over 5200 with AnTuTu. Of course benchmarks results will not translate to real world performance, but 0205 feels very smooth. Telephony problems are gone too, after the build.prop fix.
On the hand, quadrant scores are lower than Saturnal's, average is 1557.
ezantera said:
I have red lense Defy with GB kernel and latest CM7. No OC, 1000mhz
Antutu score 3900.
Now what is interesting is that you have everything better exceptdatabase I/O. I have 360 and you 215. Hm, Storage I/O is again on your side and nearly double. Mine 425 against your 922+. What is holding down CM11 in this department I wonder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is great variability in the score Storage I/O. Have found values between 271-956. See a test using Stock Clock 1000MHz.
Johan_V said:
It is interesting how much results differ. With 0205 nightly I now get consistently over 5200 with AnTuTu. Of course benchmarks results will not translate to real world performance, but 0205 feels very smooth. Telephony problems are gone too, after the build.prop fix.
On the hand, quadrant scores are lower than Saturnal's, average is 1557.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's an amazing score. If I get the best value of all tests pass little more than you found, reaching 5235 (AnTuTu).:highfive:
Very good work! Just a suggestion: could u add another benchmark app like basemark?
Enviado desde mi MI 2S mediante Tapatalk
espaciosalter20 said:
Very good work! Just a suggestion: could u add another benchmark app like basemark?
Enviado desde mi MI 2S mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! But, there's a great variety benchmarks in market. I lose a lot of time to obtain consistent results. Unfortunatly, I can't comply your request. Moreover, basemark is focused on graphics performance, while our target is the entire hardware performance combined with CM11.:good: