Wondering if any of you tried this app already
I tried it on Cyanogen, but i see no difference
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...medium=appbrain_web&utm_campaign=appbrain_web
Re: [APP] LagFix
This works!
I'm using Franco.kernel + AOPK rom and finaly scrolling in Tapatalk is butter smooth.
Check on some threads with screen shots like paranoid or AOPK threads
It says that one thing that this app does is not applicable to nexus devices. I'm not very familiar with exactly what this app does, but could it be a placebo?
this reminds me of the seeder app...lol
this is applicable to nexus's. i think for you to see a difference the phone has to be bogged down from weeks of use. in other words, it actually has to be running slowly for you to see a difference
Is there any way to automate it so it cleans once a week?
Sent from my Rock & Roll Nexus 4
ROM: MINCO V6
Kernel: Franco r50
T-Mobile
jarjar124 said:
this reminds me of the seeder app...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is totally different from seeder. This just cleans out files that bog you down. Doesn't mess with cpu speeds
Sent from a Paranoid N4
jarjar124 said:
this reminds me of the seeder app...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao agreed, everyone wants an easy one click fix for "lag"
Sent from my Nexus 4
I don't experience lag so I don't see a need for it
Not to diss you, but that's about as useful as telling us that you don't need a doctor because you are not sick.
snapper.fishes said:
Not to diss you, but that's about as useful as telling us that you don't need a doctor because you are not sick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More like a chiropractor, this isn't a doctor for lag lol
Sent from my Nexus 4
Looks like it works but only for few hours of phone use.
Since I've posted first reply Tapatalk started slowing down.
Indeed. I looks like this app it's deleting some garbage (or whatever) and this speed up phone for a while.
Very similar to clean instalation of rom + whipping data, cache, and dalvik
I did a storage benchmark before and after running this, no real improvement.
Might be notifiable if you get performance issues after copying a lot of files or when storage is low.
Tegra isn't known for its great storage controller so that's probs why it helps on n7 a lot more.
Edit: this is running a trim tool, just Google trim if you want to know more
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
From the LagFix app description:
"It is also advised to reboot your device after the TRIM process so that kernel could reinitialize block data."
I don't believe this is true. See this:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=278532
"So ext4 KEEPs the trim info between fstrim calls, while btrfs does not.
Neither can keep the keep the info between mounts or boots. "
So I don't understand why you would reboot after fstrim is run. And you can just extract fstrim from the APK and run it manually. And then reboot your device and see that again the same amount of blocks are trimmed. So whether this has any performance increase I can't say but rebooting would negate any performance increase.
Also I ran fstrim -v /cache and fstrim -v /data manually and ran androbench without rebooting before and after running fstrim. And didn't notice any significant performance increase in write speed.
is that even needed on Nexus 4 ? just saying
thanostsimo said:
is that even needed on Nexus 4 ? just saying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
It's really useless for nexus 4
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
My N4 has plenty of speed out of the box!
veyka said:
I did a storage benchmark before and after running this, no real improvement.
Might be notifiable if you get performance issues after copying a lot of files or when storage is low.
Tegra isn't known for its great storage controller so that's probs why it helps on n7 a lot more.
Edit: this is running a trim tool, just Google trim if you want to know more
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy mother of pearl! Veyka! Nice to see you here.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
I experience horrible lag while scrolling on xda app
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Crisisx1 said:
I experience horrible lag while scrolling on xda app
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tapatalk is pretty smooth.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Related
Anyone ever used one? I used it on my epic 4g and it made it run faster... thinkin bout tryin to on here. Anyone have any opions on it?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I927R using XDA
I did, but then I got rid of it because it caused it to sleep-die frequently. But lately, my phone has been sleep-dying regardless. It does make it faster, but with the high frequency of deaths, it was annoying to keep running it every time i turned the phone back on.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I927R using xda premium
Shouldn't of had to do that if it was injected into the phone...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I927R using XDA
phatryan69 said:
Anyone ever used one? I used it on my epic 4g and it made it run faster... thinkin bout tryin to on here. Anyone have any opions on it?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I927R using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Used it ... switched to RAM Manager (Pro).
It avoids using ram scripts & tweaks.
Works great since then.
Why? Android is perfect, just the way google made it. If you don't want multitasking, get an iphone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I927R using XDA
frav said:
Used it ... switched to RAM Manager (Pro).
It avoids using ram scripts & tweaks.
Works great since then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Join the club. That dev ripped off both of us.
ajt1995 said:
Why? Android is perfect, just the way google made it. If you don't want multitasking, get an iphone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I927R using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which version do you mean?
And why does Google keeps changing it?
Or is perfect with each change?
And why, with ICS, does Google make minfrees dynamic ie. different depending on a devices RAM instead of them being the same on every device like it was before?
And why did they do that after I did?
Hell, why did htc copy my bulletproof launcher on a recent stock rom for the One X by giving it a priority of 0?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Was wondering if this would work with our phones and if it does has anyone tried it????
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
aghasi24 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Was wondering if this would work with our phones and if it does has anyone tried it????
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol when I read the title post I was a little confused I was like wtf a car part for a phone?! Well it actually looks pretty good, BUT I will not test this myself until someone comes along with some information. Why don't you post in that thread and see if anyone knows.
I have used it. I found it actually made my phone lag more. Make sure to nandroid your current rom just in case.
sent from my BAD A$$ Epic touch
aghasi24 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=991276
Was wondering if this would work with our phones and if it does has anyone tried it????
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've used it before on my og evo 4g. Made it lag more until playing with the settings and setcpu then it was smooth and helped.
I recommend you take a look at Phakers thread on Placebo. He has many scripts made on/for our phone. Be warned though. There is a ton of info and random scripts for testing that you may be more confused after reading the long thread.
Currently running Jellybean Paranoid Android with placebo 2.0 and the "lite" script. But I just flashed new rom version and added the lite script so can't really comment now about this setup.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748208
Sent from deep below the earth on a Paranoid E4GT
I used to run the v6 supercharger script on my old Huawei Ascend (yeesh!) and it's pretty good (in fact, I've still got it on my SD card lol). It's made more for slower phones though, from what I remember (please correct me if I'm wrong, anybody). I know it took away 90% of the launcher redraws on my Asscend. With our phone's gig of RAM though, I don't really see a use for it. Check out the thread for better info.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Description
Enjoy the speed of Vanir but want all of AOKP's great features? Give this a try. I built AOKP on top of Vanir's excellent Linaro system. All credit to those teams, I simply did the leg work to make everything play nice. I will update this frequently but not committing to "nightlies". Please keep the thread positive and leave out the drama. Feel free to ask anything, I simply ask that you take a minute and look for your answer first.
Features
- anything merged in AOKP
- uses Vanir's camera/gallery (keep in mind Gapps normally wipes this out)
- uses Team Baked's Mms.apk
Instructions
- Download rom and preferred Gapps
- Reboot recovery
- Backup
- If coming from another rom - factory reset
- Flash rom and Gapps
- Reboot
Changelog
2-24
Initial release
Includes custom AK kernel from Vanir
Download
http://d-h.st/UhN
Credits
Team Kang (AOKP)
Team Vanir
Team Baked
Anarkia
CM
If you feel anyone is missing let me know
Download this now!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
This rocks!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
very nice, thank you akellar. running very smoothly so far.
I'm having two problems on this rom for some reason. I'm getting lockups in Chrome browser, the second time I did a battery pull because of it I had to re enter my password for Chrome. I also will be around 50+ battery life, reboot and I'm down to 15%. It's there any way I can find out what's causing this?
t1.8matt said:
I'm having two problems on this rom for some reason. I'm getting lockups in Chrome browser, the second time I did a battery pull because of it I had to re enter my password for Chrome. I also will be around 50+ battery life, reboot and I'm down to 15%. It's there any way I can find out what's causing this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't use Chrome so I can't speak to issues with it. A logcat could help though. The stock kernel is pretty extreme on some settings as well so possibly switch the kernel or tweak the settings. I'll probably be going to Lean Kernel in future releases just for stability but still highly suggest AK kernel.
As far as the weird battery stats, that happens on all roms from time to time. If you reboot again it will possibly go back to normal. It doesn't happen often but it does happen, especially on a lookup or hard reboot.
Bump ....
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
There doesn't seem to be much interest over here for this so I won't keep up the op. This is still being updated if you know where to look.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
I'm still definitely interested, where do I find it?
t1.8matt said:
I'm still definitely interested, where do I find it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rootz
Thanks
Hey akellar, the radios in your ROM seem to work a lot better than most ROMs I've tried. Are you tweaking anything for this, that you are aware of?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
geomonroe said:
Hey akellar, the radios in your ROM seem to work a lot better than most ROMs I've tried. Are you tweaking anything for this, that you are aware of?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Radios are not included in roms.
You're imagining a correlation.
Jubakuba said:
Radios are not included in roms.
You're imagining a correlation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not imaging anything, I am making an assumption based on visual evidence.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
geomonroe said:
I am not imaging anything, I am making an assumption based on visual evidence.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a different SignalStrength.java that reports signal differently. Just a placebo.
keith.mcintyre26 said:
Its a different SignalStrength.java that reports signal differently. Just a placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, so I again need to assume an app like WiFi analyser will give me accurate signal information?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
geomonroe said:
OK, so I again need to assume an app like WiFi analyser will give me accurate signal information?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure.
Why do you need an "exact" representation?
If you have signal...you have service.
Jubakuba said:
Sure.
Why do you need an "exact" representation?
If you have signal...you have service.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The latest radios is really bad. If I can improve it that would be great
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
geomonroe said:
The latest radios is really bad. If I can improve it that would be great
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you plan on doing to improve the radios? The only change is the way the system determines bars from the dBm measurement. Roms don't impact signal. And radios can't be altered.
The audio on this Rom is much softer than rootbox or some others I tried. Am I missing something? I set up noxide as usual, but just not the same performance from the sound.
Rom is sick otherwise though.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernel: B48 http://goo.gl/veDWs6
Source: B48 http://goo.gl/08ZWqi
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featuring:
Build optimizations
Performance through research
Removed wasteful debugging
Scheduler, Governor tweaks
gcc4.8 built
Up to 2726MHz and boots up @ 2.26GHz, stock clock
fsync control (by ezekeel)
exfat (fixed Samsung's Makefile breakage)
SELinux permissive
Samsung root restriction removed
Bullshît Free (Not pushing buzzwords to drop them later like others)
This is an early build, developed blind by having a tester run it and give feedback, since i have no device to test this on, this kernel is not (yet?) supported by my app, so if you own it, refrain from using it for now.
If you don't have wifi, edit your build.prop, change secure storage from true to false and you will have wifi.
i will update this as i have time for it.
Yes, there is a lot that can be done still, but doing it remotely, things take time
http://goo.gl/O0KEme init.qcom.post_boot.sh to try in case yours is causing problems
Loved your work on the G2X Morfic, Excellent job to you and your tester for getting this to us.
Hi,
This Kernel is compatible Note 3 SM-N9005 ?
Thanks
Was so waiting for u to bring Ur amazing work here can't wait to try it
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Bullshît Free (Not pushing buzzwords to drop them later like others)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao :thumbup:
Awesome morfic, thanks for dropping this on us.
thr0₩n t0g€th€R bY mY t₩€aK€d 0uT n○t€ III
Could you add support for n900k version?
Sent from my SM-N900K using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Awesome. Yeah this is the guy I was talking about in my thread. Great kernel! Way better than compulsion and saber!!
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Outstanding!!! Thanks for your work.
!!!!!"!!
FAST
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Lots of launcher force closes for me. Damn.
developmentbro said:
!!!!!"!!
FAST
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Temperature Throttle
get the apps name Perfmon and monitor the cpu core while you bench, you will see what I'm saying
I'll have to oc my n5 to work in a functioning boot clock limit, it'll be easier seeing what a device is doing when adding that.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Doesn't seem like mine is throttling at all....
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Hmm. I'm getting some weird database errors, even after wiping both caches and fixing permissions.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Going to give this one a whirl ?
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
samklee said:
Hmm. I'm getting some weird database errors, even after wiping both caches and fixing permissions.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh wait, nm. I'm not on mi7. My bad.
Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
My target kernel will have less top clock, and instead have other changes to make it fun while keeping it as more of a daily driver than these "dude, how far can you take this?" kernels that happened during testing
morfic said:
My target kernel will have less top clock, and instead have other changes to make it fun while keeping it as more of a daily driver than these "dude, how far can you take this?" kernels that happened during testing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I agree, there is really no need for the Snapdragon 800 CPU to be clocked this high. 2.5 - 2.7 is more than enough. Anything else is just overkill I would rather just see some optimizations.
Nice, glad it's here and you took the time to get started without actually having the device ...
Tweaked ROM and Morfic's kernel were beastly for my Note 2.. Can't wait to reunite them again on the 3..:thumbup:
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
In any case, here was mine at 2.88...
This is quadrant btw... Not whack antutu
Sent from my SM-N900T using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Hi guys, just wanted to share this that I found over the N5 Forum.
Looks like they pulled the optimized libs from the Moto X and created a flashable zip.
I'm using KitKang and flashed this... Phone feels more responsive.
Feel free to try yourselves.
LINK REMOVED AS IT BREAKS ALL CAMERA APPS.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Those are Dalvik and Bionic libs optimized for Qualcomm CPU and our GN has OMAP CPU so they shouldnt make any significant difference, its probably placebo
Godra said:
Those are Dalvik and Bionic libs optimized for Qualcomm CPU and our GN has OMAP CPU so they shouldnt make any significant difference, its probably placebo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah... Probably... But I do have the feeling that the little sluggishness is gone... Let's see!! I'll report back.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
wisefreakz said:
Yeah... Probably... But I do have the feeling that the little sluggishness is gone... Let's see!! I'll report back.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean, they could give some boost, but not its fully potential as they arent made for our phone
wisefreakz said:
Hi guys, just wanted to share this that I found over the N5 Forum.
Looks like they pulled the optimized libs from the Moto X and created a flashable zip.
I'm using KitKang and flashed this... Phone feels more responsive.
Feel free to try yourselves.
The Linkhttp://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2537299
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just read that entire thread as well as watched a posted video comparison on it. My verdict from all of that is this doesn't do much and ART fully trumps it as far as performance boost. That is my conclusion on it for the Nexus 5. I would imagine it does nothing on the Galaxy Nexus seeing as we have a completely different chipset.
Not trying to be discouraging, by all means if someone wants to do a thorough testing of this mod and give some feedback on the contrary I will absolutely eat my words, but from all that has been spoken about the mod on that thread It looks like ART is still the better choice.
Thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention though, it's always good to have different options.
Nephilim said:
I just read that entire thread as well as watched a posted video comparison on it. My verdict from all of that is this doesn't do much and ART fully trumps it as far as performance boost. That is my conclusion on it for the Nexus 5. I would imagine it does nothing on the Galaxy Nexus seeing as we have a completely different chipset.
Not trying to be discouraging, by all means if someone wants to do a thorough testing of this mod and give some feedback on the contrary I will absolutely eat my words, but from all that has been spoken about the mod on that thread It looks like ART is still the better choice.
Thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention though, it's always good to have different options.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey Neph, I can say that with this somehow I feel my GN snappier. But just realized it breaks all camera apps.
So to me is a no go.
Cheers
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
wisefreakz said:
Hey Neph, I can say that with this somehow I feel my GN snappier. But just realized it breaks all camera apps.
So to me is a no go.
Cheers
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lucky me i read this
wisefreakz said:
Hey Neph, I can say that with this somehow I feel my GN snappier. But just realized it breaks all camera apps.
So to me is a no go.
Cheers
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for efforts but can title be changed please.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
n0ve said:
Thx for efforts but can title be changed please.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Done!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app