Develop Bugs

AnTuTu Benchmark results

This is what I got
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA Premium App

Tried your app:
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Antutu benchmark results
Looks like the real samsung s2(9100) is almost on top.. What phone is sc-o2c?
Tmo Galaxy S2

The SC-02C is the Japanese version of the Galaxy S2, pretty similar to the international version, just with added 1seg receiver, and identical in peformance.
Would you mind doing a GLBenchmark test? Nenamark2? Electopia?

Im bout to post nenamark2
Tmo Galaxy S2

seems like there's no escaping it so might as well stick all the benchmark scores here and at least have them organized by app

I already posted them as a new topic sorry.
Tmo Galaxy S2

Here is mine.......

it's my

here are mines

I got a total score of 5583...

gdmlaz said:
here are mines
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How?
What's your set up?

Juggernaut V2, Synergy v0.02, interactive governor 1.83ghz

just completed

Juggernaut 2.0, bullet 1.8. I'm pleased.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Oops
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium

Here's mine. Juggernaut 3.7 1.8mHz with bullet 2.7 kernel = 6838. Beastmod is 100 less at the same frequency. With cm7 and synergy kernel at same frequency, I get 7111. Wow. Cm9 will probably be better. It may help the thread if we all use the same frequency. That way we can see which ROM and kernel produce the best results at that clock speed. All my tests were with the performance governer and min/max at 1.8GHz. All tests were done after a fresh reboot and all apps killed in memory.

these are mine
Running stock 2.3.5 and bullet 2.9

For some reason.... I get better results without OC my kernel to 1.83 weird.

I got around 6300~ Jugg 3.7 stock

Quadrant updated for multiple cores and ICS

Topics says it all. You should learn not to put much weight into these benchmarks, but the new update should give a clearer picture of our devices performance.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Thanks for the heads up!

Thanks. It's just like a dyno for cars. Just numbers.

Already a thread here, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1495834

This is really strange. I have a similar setup as yours and get 3570.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1350 max, francokernel. i used onDemand however in order to run the test.

franco 16.2 and AOKP 22
1350 ondemand ~2600

AOKP 23 with Trinity, 1350 max/min, performance - 3570 odd
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

chainfire only works if you have it enabled. Do you have a per-app profile for Quadrant? I get 3200ish with 700-1200 francoTurtle. I wasn't really expecting that much.

The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Running CM9 with morfic's 1350 any kernel, got 3517
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

could you try with min 700mhz?

Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.

If you're curious as to how your results compare with stock (4.0.2):
A pitiful 1849

I got 2000 how do you get your I/O up? Mines bad/:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

1350/700
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

italia0101 said:
The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran a lot of test and figured out the having "force gpu rendering" checked will increase your 2d score on quadrant.
I get 900-1000 with it enabled
I get 200-300 with it not checked.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

ericth18 said:
Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we know how much garbage that phone was.
Goes to show you benchmarks are a joke.

Using CM9 with morfics 1536 any kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Great, finally a proper way to compare our e-penises. Let's hope people still realize Quadrant scores are not a good way to compare roms... (or maybe I'm just saying this because my scores are rather low )

I just want to make out which setting saves bettery in Franco app?

This thread is made to save lots of question on the thread..
Result will come soon with screenshot.. if anyone has current settings of Franco app which saves battery.. pls post it here.
My settings write now without tweaks to give an example and idea about the post
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Wow, max 1000mhz, why don't you just buy sgs?

jnr21 said:
Wow, max 1000mhz, why don't you just buy sgs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What sud I use u mean? Just post your screenshot so that everyone will b happy to use it... ah...!!!!!
sent from jElly Belly NeXus PrimE

Here is mine
Look how much I have to increase voltage for any over clock, although I can run 1.8ghz at 1450mV and my settings I can run 1.2 ghz at 750mV. Do the maths
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

The Gingerbread Man said:
Here is mine
Look how much I have to increase voltage for any over clock, although I can run 1.8ghz at 1450mV and my settings I can run 1.2 ghz at 750mV. Do the maths
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please describe which Rom you use jb or ics... which kernel build no?
sent from jElly Belly NeXus PrimE

sam razzy said:
Please describe which Rom you use jb or ics... which kernel build no?
sent from jElly Belly NeXus PrimE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use Bigxie JRN84D Rooted Busybox Deodexed v2 with r215 so I'm running jelly bean. You might find your gnex can't handle under volt so well, it varies. These values are stable for me and I've not seen anyone else with 690 as lowest stable voltage
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

The Gingerbread Man said:
I use Bigxie JRN84D Rooted Busybox Deodexed v2 with r215 so I'm running jelly bean. You might find your gnex can't handle under volt so well, it varies. These values are stable for me and I've not seen anyone else with 690 as lowest stable voltage
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks bro.. I will try ur under volt settings
sent from jElly Belly NeXus PrimE

Just for info my under volt settings are pointless as smart reflex was calibrating all the mid and lower mid speeds to higher, so yeah its pointless
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus

Cpu states jumps

Hi all!
Take a look to this ss:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
does anybody knows why my Gnexus jumps from 384Mhz to 1228Mhz with no steps between, through 1036Mhz and 729Mhz?
I'm on AOKP Mile5, Franco Kernel M4. Governor On Demand and a little UV.
Thank you.

Its your governor. On demand will jump up like that. Try interactive.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

d4nntheman said:
Its your governor. On demand will jump up like that. Try interactive.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, do you think I'd obtain better battery life with interactive?
Inviato in Technicolor©

zackpack said:
Thank you, do you think I'd obtain better battery life with interactive?
Inviato in Technicolor©
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard that ondemand is less aggressive on battery. I would personally go for conservative if battery is what you need

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1767797
Here's a pretty good list of common governors and how they differ. Personally I stick to interactive or interactivex.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

Interactive is worse than odemand. At least from what i've expierenced. Although depending on how the ondemand and interactive governor are tuned with the governor control both could be equal. Don't ask me.. i dont know . I personally like pegasusq. Its a mix of intellidemand and ondemand and it does what your asking. Only scales as much as is needed. It will use mostly 230 and 720 and only use 1228 if the load of the CPU is heavy and needs it. Kernels that have it thus far are AirKernel, Samurai, and Nyan. As far as i know anyways.

On demand and interactive work the same, however Interactive is more aggressive and quick.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

GPU OC

This gpu is overclocked on stock galaxy nexus so would it be possible on the fire?
Sent from my nuclear powered toaster.

Doesn't over clocking the CPU affect the GPU? After some Benchmarks, the GPU was wwwwaaaaaayyyyy better when the CPU was overclocked
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app

jji7skyline said:
This gpu is overclocked on stock galaxy nexus so would it be possible on the fire?
Sent from my nuclear powered toaster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
As you can see my tests indicate that the 3D and 2D Graphics perform better when the CPU is over clocked.
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app

404-Not Found said:
View attachment 2256423View attachment 2256424
As you can see my tests indicate that the 3D and 2D Graphics perform better when the CPU is over clocked.
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see there's a huge difference. Maybe it's partly to do with the different Android versions though? (4.1.2 and 4.3?)
The reason I wanted a gpu oc was that the cpu oc uses a lot of battery, I was hoping a gpu only oc would use less, and provide a bigger gaming performance boost.

jji7skyline said:
I see there's a huge difference. Maybe it's partly to do with the different Android versions though? (4.1.2 and 4.3?)
The reason I wanted a gpu oc was that the cpu oc uses a lot of battery, I was hoping a gpu only oc would use less, and provide a bigger gaming performance boost.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could work, but never heard that the GPU could oc but there may be a way........
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app