Develop Bugs

Quadrant updated for multiple cores and ICS

Topics says it all. You should learn not to put much weight into these benchmarks, but the new update should give a clearer picture of our devices performance.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

Thanks for the heads up!

Thanks. It's just like a dyno for cars. Just numbers.

Already a thread here, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1495834

This is really strange. I have a similar setup as yours and get 3570.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1350 max, francokernel. i used onDemand however in order to run the test.

franco 16.2 and AOKP 22
1350 ondemand ~2600

AOKP 23 with Trinity, 1350 max/min, performance - 3570 odd
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

chainfire only works if you have it enabled. Do you have a per-app profile for Quadrant? I get 3200ish with 700-1200 francoTurtle. I wasn't really expecting that much.

The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

Running CM9 with morfic's 1350 any kernel, got 3517
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

could you try with min 700mhz?

Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.

If you're curious as to how your results compare with stock (4.0.2):
A pitiful 1849

I got 2000 how do you get your I/O up? Mines bad/:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

1350/700
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

italia0101 said:
The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran a lot of test and figured out the having "force gpu rendering" checked will increase your 2d score on quadrant.
I get 900-1000 with it enabled
I get 200-300 with it not checked.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App

ericth18 said:
Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we know how much garbage that phone was.
Goes to show you benchmarks are a joke.

Using CM9 with morfics 1536 any kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Great, finally a proper way to compare our e-penises. Let's hope people still realize Quadrant scores are not a good way to compare roms... (or maybe I'm just saying this because my scores are rather low )

[Q] CPU Way Lower that HTC One X on Quadrant Benchmark

This is my first Post, and i want to say thank you to all on this site. And thank you again.
I have the new CM posted 7/29. It's smooth and fast. Everything works fine except for youtube crashes when i press the volume button.
Does any body has the same issue? Any fix to this?
Also i ran a Quadrant Benchmark and i notice that the cpu reading is very low compared to HTC ONE X, That shows DOUBLE readings on CPU. Is it because the Quad Core of the ONE X?
Here are my readings:
Total: 4443
CPU: 5343
MEM:11200
I/O:3351
2D:273
3D:2046.
This is a great rom, i can't wait for the new release coming soon.

Lol. It's just numbers. Performance is different in the real world.
Sent from my T-Mobile Galaxy S III .

Quad core is nice but still useless I think on a phone. Dual core is getting every job done just fine. And like the previous guy just said... it's just numbers..

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hmm idk.. This is my score on free gs3 at 1.6ghz. Something to do with special dalvik sauce in stock roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

benefit14snake said:
Hmm idk.. This is my score on free gs3 at 1.6ghz. Something to do with special dalvik sauce in stock roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dalvik sauce??
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

volcomguyaz said:
Dalvik sauce??
Meh ask the trinity kernel dev, I'm quoting him lol
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

...Classic!
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium

Newer cm builds not as smooth.

I've noticed that newer builds towards the end of the month are not as smooth as ones from say the 21st. Its almost as if the gpu is is performing worse. Its not kernel related. Ran the same kernel on both and even copies the old trebuchet.apk from the old build. Tried cm10 kang by winner00 and euroskanks jellybro build. Same thing on both. The older builds from mid month have no such issue. I can confirm this on two different galaxy nexus. Ran Franco 248 384 GPU on both. Its very noticeable if you start closing the app drawer before it finishes scrolling or finishes the over scroll effect. It used to be smooth. Now it gets choppy like it would in ICS.
Let's try to find out which change on the gerrit is responsible.
I am pretty sure it was merged somewhere between the 21st and the 30th.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

Small update: the quadrant scores on 3d and 2d were also significantly lower on the new builds even on the same kernel. Almost 20% on the 3d. CPU, memory, and io were all roughly about the same.
2591 for 3d on build 8-21 on Franco 248 384 GPU
2250 for 3d on build 9-03 on Franco 248 384 GPU
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

iSaint said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DAT ASS
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

These are all nightly bro. There far from a RC. Its the price we pay for a daily update. There's always stable cm9 if you want something stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

DroidDavi said:
These are all nightly bro. There far from a RC. Its the price we pay for a daily update. There's always stable cm9 if you want something stable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. Its been like this for a week now. I was hoping to track down which change was merged that is responsible for the drop in performance that way we can figure out why it decreased performance. The difference in performance is noticeable.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

GPU OC

This gpu is overclocked on stock galaxy nexus so would it be possible on the fire?
Sent from my nuclear powered toaster.

Doesn't over clocking the CPU affect the GPU? After some Benchmarks, the GPU was wwwwaaaaaayyyyy better when the CPU was overclocked
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app

jji7skyline said:
This gpu is overclocked on stock galaxy nexus so would it be possible on the fire?
Sent from my nuclear powered toaster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
As you can see my tests indicate that the 3D and 2D Graphics perform better when the CPU is over clocked.
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app

404-Not Found said:
View attachment 2256423View attachment 2256424
As you can see my tests indicate that the 3D and 2D Graphics perform better when the CPU is over clocked.
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see there's a huge difference. Maybe it's partly to do with the different Android versions though? (4.1.2 and 4.3?)
The reason I wanted a gpu oc was that the cpu oc uses a lot of battery, I was hoping a gpu only oc would use less, and provide a bigger gaming performance boost.

jji7skyline said:
I see there's a huge difference. Maybe it's partly to do with the different Android versions though? (4.1.2 and 4.3?)
The reason I wanted a gpu oc was that the cpu oc uses a lot of battery, I was hoping a gpu only oc would use less, and provide a bigger gaming performance boost.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could work, but never heard that the GPU could oc but there may be a way........
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using xda app-developers app

S4 Pro processor in AT&T version

Just got my G Pro and I am only scoring 7K in quadrant and 20K in Antutu. Looks like I'm supposed to get 12K & 25K respectively, so I think I got jipped.
Downloaded cpu-z and it says I have an S4 Pro instead of the 600. Is that true? If so I will go exchange it today.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

NCRoadster said:
Just got my G Pro and I am only scoring 7K in quadrant and 20K in Antutu. Looks like I'm supposed to get 12K & 25K respectively, so I think I got jipped.
Downloaded cpu-z and it says I have an S4 Pro instead of the 600. Is that true? If so I will go exchange it today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! I'm gonna look into this as well. If true, I'll return today! I'm baffled.
Sent from my LG-E980 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Mine seems to b right, using cpu identifier. Try this app. Tell me what u come up with.
Sent from my LG-E980 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

I believe there was already a discussion on this. By my recollection the Snapdragon 600 is essentially a revamped S4 and that's why some CPU apps identify it as such.
Found the thread.

mrfeuss said:
I believe there was already a discussion on this. By my recollection the Snapdragon 600 is essentially a revamped S4 and that's why some CPU apps identify it as such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a 600
Sent from my LG-E980 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Just benchmarked in front of the ac unit and I'm getting the appropriate scores now. Thermal throttling sucks!

Here's what I found. It is the Snapdragon pro 600. It's a higher variant of the S4 pro.
http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/smartphones/lg-optimus-g-pro

Just ran a quick antutu on my stock of pro. Only difference from full stock is the thermal throttling turned off.
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda app-developers app