Just got my G Pro and I am only scoring 7K in quadrant and 20K in Antutu. Looks like I'm supposed to get 12K & 25K respectively, so I think I got jipped.
Downloaded cpu-z and it says I have an S4 Pro instead of the 600. Is that true? If so I will go exchange it today.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
NCRoadster said:
Just got my G Pro and I am only scoring 7K in quadrant and 20K in Antutu. Looks like I'm supposed to get 12K & 25K respectively, so I think I got jipped.
Downloaded cpu-z and it says I have an S4 Pro instead of the 600. Is that true? If so I will go exchange it today.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! I'm gonna look into this as well. If true, I'll return today! I'm baffled.
Sent from my LG-E980 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Mine seems to b right, using cpu identifier. Try this app. Tell me what u come up with.
Sent from my LG-E980 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I believe there was already a discussion on this. By my recollection the Snapdragon 600 is essentially a revamped S4 and that's why some CPU apps identify it as such.
Found the thread.
mrfeuss said:
I believe there was already a discussion on this. By my recollection the Snapdragon 600 is essentially a revamped S4 and that's why some CPU apps identify it as such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a 600
Sent from my LG-E980 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Just benchmarked in front of the ac unit and I'm getting the appropriate scores now. Thermal throttling sucks!
Here's what I found. It is the Snapdragon pro 600. It's a higher variant of the S4 pro.
http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/smartphones/lg-optimus-g-pro
Just ran a quick antutu on my stock of pro. Only difference from full stock is the thermal throttling turned off.
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda app-developers app
Related
This is what I got
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA Premium App
Tried your app:
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Antutu benchmark results
Looks like the real samsung s2(9100) is almost on top.. What phone is sc-o2c?
Tmo Galaxy S2
The SC-02C is the Japanese version of the Galaxy S2, pretty similar to the international version, just with added 1seg receiver, and identical in peformance.
Would you mind doing a GLBenchmark test? Nenamark2? Electopia?
Im bout to post nenamark2
Tmo Galaxy S2
seems like there's no escaping it so might as well stick all the benchmark scores here and at least have them organized by app
I already posted them as a new topic sorry.
Tmo Galaxy S2
Here is mine.......
it's my
here are mines
I got a total score of 5583...
gdmlaz said:
here are mines
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How?
What's your set up?
Juggernaut V2, Synergy v0.02, interactive governor 1.83ghz
just completed
Juggernaut 2.0, bullet 1.8. I'm pleased.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Oops
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Here's mine. Juggernaut 3.7 1.8mHz with bullet 2.7 kernel = 6838. Beastmod is 100 less at the same frequency. With cm7 and synergy kernel at same frequency, I get 7111. Wow. Cm9 will probably be better. It may help the thread if we all use the same frequency. That way we can see which ROM and kernel produce the best results at that clock speed. All my tests were with the performance governer and min/max at 1.8GHz. All tests were done after a fresh reboot and all apps killed in memory.
these are mine
Running stock 2.3.5 and bullet 2.9
For some reason.... I get better results without OC my kernel to 1.83 weird.
I got around 6300~ Jugg 3.7 stock
Topics says it all. You should learn not to put much weight into these benchmarks, but the new update should give a clearer picture of our devices performance.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
Thanks for the heads up!
Thanks. It's just like a dyno for cars. Just numbers.
Already a thread here, http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1495834
This is really strange. I have a similar setup as yours and get 3570.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1350 max, francokernel. i used onDemand however in order to run the test.
franco 16.2 and AOKP 22
1350 ondemand ~2600
AOKP 23 with Trinity, 1350 max/min, performance - 3570 odd
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
chainfire only works if you have it enabled. Do you have a per-app profile for Quadrant? I get 3200ish with 700-1200 francoTurtle. I wasn't really expecting that much.
The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Running CM9 with morfic's 1350 any kernel, got 3517
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
could you try with min 700mhz?
Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.
If you're curious as to how your results compare with stock (4.0.2):
A pitiful 1849
I got 2000 how do you get your I/O up? Mines bad/:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
1350/700
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
italia0101 said:
The two who posted the results .your 2d preference is massively different
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran a lot of test and figured out the having "force gpu rendering" checked will increase your 2d score on quadrant.
I get 900-1000 with it enabled
I get 200-300 with it not checked.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
ericth18 said:
Scored 4039 with my Motorola Atrix 4G running CM7 and faux123's 1.45 Ghz kernal hack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we know how much garbage that phone was.
Goes to show you benchmarks are a joke.
Using CM9 with morfics 1536 any kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Great, finally a proper way to compare our e-penises. Let's hope people still realize Quadrant scores are not a good way to compare roms... (or maybe I'm just saying this because my scores are rather low )
This is my first Post, and i want to say thank you to all on this site. And thank you again.
I have the new CM posted 7/29. It's smooth and fast. Everything works fine except for youtube crashes when i press the volume button.
Does any body has the same issue? Any fix to this?
Also i ran a Quadrant Benchmark and i notice that the cpu reading is very low compared to HTC ONE X, That shows DOUBLE readings on CPU. Is it because the Quad Core of the ONE X?
Here are my readings:
Total: 4443
CPU: 5343
MEM:11200
I/O:3351
2D:273
3D:2046.
This is a great rom, i can't wait for the new release coming soon.
Lol. It's just numbers. Performance is different in the real world.
Sent from my T-Mobile Galaxy S III .
Quad core is nice but still useless I think on a phone. Dual core is getting every job done just fine. And like the previous guy just said... it's just numbers..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hmm idk.. This is my score on free gs3 at 1.6ghz. Something to do with special dalvik sauce in stock roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
benefit14snake said:
Hmm idk.. This is my score on free gs3 at 1.6ghz. Something to do with special dalvik sauce in stock roms.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dalvik sauce??
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
volcomguyaz said:
Dalvik sauce??
Meh ask the trinity kernel dev, I'm quoting him lol
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
...Classic!
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
So my phone stopped charging my battery. I bought the extended qcell 4800 mah and a wall charger. My question is I'm wondering with all this extra power, could I maybe use the voltage differently? Currently I'm on the domination rom and I noticed it has voltage control. Is there something neat I can do with this battery besides not charge my phone for 3 days? Lol
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
No... It's a battery.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
graydiggy said:
No... It's a battery.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, +1
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Voltage control is the voltage to the processor, you can play around with undervolting and underclocking to try and get it where you don't have to charge your phone for four days instead of three.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda app-developers app
Qcell external battery.!
who purchased Q cell external battery?is it better than Zero Lemon?
I have 2 Q Cell Slim extended, they have worked well, but I have never tried Zero Lemon.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
amin123shahnouze said:
who purchased Q cell external battery?is it better than Zero Lemon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's some helpful information from @Mr. Struck over at AF about the Zero Lemon. Read through the thread, sounds like ZL is a good option as well. I can not speak intelligently on either
http://androidforums.com/boost-mobi...23-anyone-buy-zerolemon-7000-mah-battery.html
jdsingle76 said:
Here's some helpful information from @Mr. Struck over at AF about the Zero Lemon. Read through the thread, sounds like ZL is a good option as well. I can not speak intelligently on either
http://androidforums.com/boost-mobi...23-anyone-buy-zerolemon-7000-mah-battery.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
7000 mah... Wow
bilgerryan said:
7000 mah... Wow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should see the one for the note 3
?
? Powered By My Moga Pro ?
Hi! I was to bored today.. So i decided to open a thread to show how much my ZL scored in antutu..
So here i started..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This is my XZL scored without any mod, just root and use ondemand with cfq.. No tweak with android 4.2.2.. So hows about yours?
Sent from my C6502 using xda app-developers app
Stock 4.2.2,root
If you feel that I've helped you in any way,,please hit the thanks button
Sent from my Xperia ZL (C6502) using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Android 4.2.2 rooted
Sent from my C6503
CM10.2 stock
Stock Android 4.2.2 without any modification
Sent from my C6506 using xda app-developers app
Stock 4.2.2
Sent from my C6506 using xda app-developers app
Stock android 4.2.2 JB
I dont know why there are many different scores if we are talking about the same phone same specs, and same firmware
danieldp1990 said:
I dont know why there are many different scores if we are talking about the same phone same specs, and same firmware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The scores depend upon a lot of factors one of which are the number of background services running at the time the benchmark was done...so lesser the background services the higher your device will score in the benchmark...see my score above
If you manage(optimize) the background services then you'll certainly have a little more performance and juice of your device 0
If you feel that I've helped you in any way,,please hit the thanks button
Sent from my Xperia ZL (C6502) using Tapatalk 4 Beta
However, if you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance. By Chainfire
I use a margin of error. Basically if you get 500+ higher, then you can be sure that performance has improved. Less than that is just the general variation of benchmarking.
most of you got higher scores in antutu than me..
Sent from my C6502 using xda app-developers app