Related
Hi, to get a feeling about the CM9 - ICS progress, i am building CM9 Kangs from the actual cyanogen source.
Fell free to use them ON YOUR OWN RISK.
This is not an official cyanogenMOD release and you will not get official support from the cyanogen dev team.
I will update the KANG if there are important changes.
DOWNLOAD
http://dl.thomaskuepper.net/update-cm-9.0.0-RC0-GN-KANG-signed.zip
Google Apps
http://dl.thomaskuepper.net/gapps-ics-20111125-2.zip
Flashing
* Boot into Clockwork
* Make a FULL NAND Backup
* Wipe dalvik and cache
* Flash ROM + Google Apps
* Reboot
many thanks to the CM Team, i take no credit on all of this.
erm... there are no changes in the sources... only the ones from the original google devs...?
or where did you get the Sources from?
jim_panse said:
erm... there are no changes in the sources... only the ones from the original google devs...?
or where did you get the Sources from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as i said it is the cyanogen source.
github.com/cyanogenmod
So no actual CM Code in it, only stock code.
Yeah and also using these gapps gtalk is FC for me (in my own KANGs of the source that is.)
edit: There are minor changes from Google's sources: http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#q,status:merged+branch:ics,n,z
jim_panse said:
erm... there are no changes in the sources... only the ones from the original google devs...?
or where did you get the Sources from?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#q,status:open,n,z
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#q,status:merged,n,z
OP - thanks for posting CM9 nightlies
Oh, okay. Thank you. Only looked on the commits of github and there was nothing. Thank you for the link.
..........
I'll give it a try. Thanks for uploading. My Laptop is too weak to compile CM9
ZuluGen?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
phone_user said:
ZuluGen?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh no, someone recognized me .
not yet enough time to build a zulugen rom , but perhaps soon.
trismegistos said:
oh no, someone recognized me .
not yet enough time to build a zulugen rom , but perhaps soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Later, when I buy GN, I will see Zulu rom
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Thank you very much!!!
I hope to see more of your work soon
MfG Daniel
CM9 is finally here！！！
yeeson said:
CM9 is finally here！！！
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, a cm9 kang is here. Is the op a CM team dev? If not, does this have the approval of the team?
/me sent this on a i9250 using tapatalk
yeeson said:
CM9 is finally here！！！
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would love to see what work and what doesn't before flashing..
I wiped and flashed my GN yesterday and accidentally deleted all my backups, so i spent like 2 hours restoring the phone.. Don't feel like doing it again today.
Any willing guinea pigs around ??
bk201doesntexist said:
Actually, a cm9 kang is here. Is the op a CM team dev? If not, does this have the approval of the team?
/me sent this on a i9250 using tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thread says kang and unofficial. There has been kangs of cm9 for the galaxy nexus for awhile as cm9 nightlies aren't available yet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
zephiK said:
Thread says kang and unofficial. There has been kangs of cm9 for the galaxy nexus for awhile as cm9 nightlies aren't available yet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, aren't those kangs from Koush? AFAIK he is a developer for CM, and a very talented one. But still, it's open-source, and he gives the proper credits. As long as people are aware this build is -probably- far from perfect (e.g. non working camera etc) then it's fine. I think. Unless CM object
EDIT: nvm, thought you mentioned the Nexus S (it's getting late)
zephiK said:
Thread says kang and unofficial. There has been kangs of cm9 for the galaxy nexus for awhile as cm9 nightlies aren't available yet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is the first kang of cm i see around for galaxy nexus. and i've had the phone pretty much since its release.
Naturally, I know cm9 nightlies aren't available yet, I've used cm7 kangs built by me on SGS pretty much since last year, so i'm used to it's release schedule (NO ETA).
As it's not official, it will get no support from CM team. If you search around, you'll see that no kang can be called a CM rom unless it's released by a member of the team.
bk201doesntexist said:
this is the first kang of cm i see around for galaxy nexus. and i've had the phone pretty much since its release.
Naturally, I know cm9 nightlies aren't available yet, I've used cm7 kangs built by me on SGS pretty much since last year, so i'm used to it's release schedule (NO ETA).
As it's not official, it will get no support from CM team. If you search around, you'll see that no kang can be called a CM rom unless it's released by a member of the team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kangs has been posted on twitter by the guys at euroskank: http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/skankwich/maguro/
Maguro is our code name so I'm sure those are the CM9 kangs for our phones. It just hasn't been posted on XDA but its been going around twitter for the past couple of days.
You don't have to be a developer at CM to post their releases if its kangs. He's not taking credit, it is all credited to CM and CM is purely open source. There isn't really a "developer" for CM, if you want to contribute. Go ahead, nothings stopping you, it just has to be approved thats all. (Pretty much what you said), and I'm sure everything is working. I had a Nexus S using CM9 kangs constructed by FuZZ and guys at euroskank and everything worked except video.
So I'm sure that maguro would be fine because all the library files for Galaxy Nexus are already available. But everything is still a alpha build. It's considered alpha because a lot of the CM9 features are incomplete. The latest kang comes with DSP Manager so it's getting closer and closer for a beta as everyday goes by.
Numerous tweets (according from twitter) from various "CM devs" such as kmobs, koush (and probably more) have the device so I'm sure it will receive official support.
Here you have a link for which is interested in who carry in our galaxy MIUI nexus v4. The result will be announced on February 7
http://www.facebook.com/questions/287679141291668/
https://plus.google.com/108531052526575991056/posts/X1Mqb8Mw4o6
blackdub370 said:
Here you have a link for which is interested in who carry in our galaxy MIUI nexus v4. The result will be announced on February 7
http://www.facebook.com/questions/287679141291668/
https://plus.google.com/108531052526...ts/X1Mqb8Mw4o6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
google+ url is mangled.
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/12544-ro...vicious-popcorn-kernel-01-31-2012-1022am-est/
So what are we voting for again?
https://plus.google.com/108531052526575991056/posts/X1Mqb8Mw4o6
Official miui !
adrynalyne said:
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/12544-ro...vicious-popcorn-kernel-01-31-2012-1022am-est/
so what are we voting for again?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
adrynalyne said:
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/12544-ro...vicious-popcorn-kernel-01-31-2012-1022am-est/
So what are we voting for again?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MIUI support for the Google Galaxy Nexus, not some MIUI build for the Verizon Galaxy Nexus.
josteink said:
MIUI support for the Google Galaxy Nexus, not some MIUI build for the Verizon Galaxy Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/12774-ro...y-nexus-2120-v2-weekly-01-31-2012-1028am-est/
So what are we voting for again?
josteink said:
MIUI support for the Google Galaxy Nexus, not some MIUI build for the Verizon Galaxy Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, damn you sound bitter. Last i checked, the Verizon version was still a Google Galaxy Nexus. Maybe you meant to say for the GSM version as well?
miketoasty said:
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/12774-ro...y-nexus-2120-v2-weekly-01-31-2012-1028am-est/
So what are we voting for again?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's still not general MIUI support. That a build, from someone not MIUI.
josteink said:
That's still not general MIUI support. That a build, from someone not MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do know that its a port, regardless of who does it, right?
from google+ said:
Our port is based on the manufacture’s original ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
josteink said:
That's still not general MIUI support. That a build, from someone not MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not what you asked for but thanks for clearing that up. Didn't know there was a difference between MIUIv4 and MIUIv4
Its a lot like an rom built on a Google buildbox and an aosp rom built on a user's buildbox.
The Google rom is automagically better because its official
adrynalyne said:
Its a lot like an rom built on a Google buildbox and an aosp rom built on a user's buildbox.
The Google rom is automagically better because its official
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well. not only that.
When Google releases something, they probably don't leave broken links on their FP for 4 releases. Like this rootzwiki link has.
You want me to trust someone who is unable to post and maintain a link to reliably and correctly build, package and distribute a full firmware package, for a phone he admits he does not have?
First GSM builds couldn't even be installed because the updater script asserterted "toro". That's a pretty glaring mistake.
Sorry for not really trusting that release particularly much.
josteink said:
Well. not only that.
When Google releases something, they probably don't leave broken links on their FP for 4 releases. Like this rootzwiki link has.
You want me to trust someone who is unable to post and maintain a link to reliably and correctly build, package and distribute a full firmware package, for a phone he admits he does not have?
First GSM builds couldn't even be installed because the updater script asserterted "toro". That's a pretty glaring mistake.
Sorry for not really trusting that release particularly much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We just can't have nice things due to the haters.
well, despite all problems, we still hope another competitor shows up here..
Vicious MIUI is not oficially, please vote !
After the dev hate I saw in here, I don't think I will. Everyone is a critic, few of them step up to the challenge and fix their whines.
adrynalyne said:
After the dev hate I saw in here, I don't think I will. Everyone is a critic, few of them step up to the challenge and fix their whines.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol??? who??!
can't you all read???
the chinese say "Our port is based on the manufacture’s original ROM. So the device to be selected needs to have original ROM 4.0. "
so which device out of those has an official, original 4.0 ROM?
1. Samsung Galaxy Nexus
2.Samsung Galaxy S II i9100
3. Huawei Honor
duhh
...build it yourself?
http://miuiandroid.com/2012/02/xiaomi-opens-up-android-rom-source-code/
I am wondering why there is no OFFICIAL CM10 ROM on here for Sprint Gnex? Is t because CM10 wants us to go to their website instead? Ad based? I don't get it all ROMs are based off of CM10 but not officially....?
http://get.cm/?device=toroplus&type=nightly
Official nightly
biscuitownz said:
http://get.cm/?device=toroplus&type=nightly
Official nightly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got that already that, that doesn't answer my question .
Why is it so hard to just go to their website?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
AlexWekell said:
Why is it so hard to just go to their website?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not just wondering if it was a legal issue. Does anyone out there see my point?
You can always ask for your money back.
Lol true....?
What do you mean by officially?
Maybe the maintainer for the CM10 Toroplus don't have time/don't want to maintain a thread here. It is offically supported even though it isnt here at XDA.
Jess813 said:
I am wondering why there is no OFFICIAL CM10 ROM on here for Sprint Gnex? Is t because CM10 wants us to go to their website instead? Ad based? I don't get it all ROMs are based off of CM10 but not officially....?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the "Galaxy Nexus Android Development" even if used as GSM reference, its the generic section..u can refer to the CM10 thread in there..when u post a problem/question just specify u are on toroplus...there are already people with toro and toroplus following there
Herman76 said:
Maybe the maintainer for the CM10 Toroplus don't have time/don't want to maintain a thread here. It is offically supported even though it isnt here at XDA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank u, simple honest answer.
The CM10 thread for GSM wasn't started by a CM team member either. Important to note that just because a thread doesn't exist on XDA does not indicate whether there's support or not.
Looks like El Goog has shown us some love. the 4.2_r1 branch now has the device/vender files included.
Talk amoungst yourselves.....I'm a little verclempt.
cteneyck said:
Looks like El Goog has shown us some love. the 4.2_r1 branch now has the device/vender files included.
Talk amoungst yourselves.....I'm a little verclempt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did 4.1.2.
adrynalyne said:
So did 4.1.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was on the master branch with no cdma support.
Its been mostly available for quite a while now....
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
cteneyck said:
That was on the master branch with no cdma support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP has always had CDMA support.
adrynalyne said:
AOSP has always had CDMA support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iirc it was added with 2.3.4 (for teh nexus s 4g)
Paranoid Android is probably top 3 of my all time favorite ROMs, my backup nexus 5 just suffered an accident (*silently cries* ) but that lead me to this thought...is there anybody out there who can and is willing to maintain an unofficial build of paranoid android for the note 3?
_INSPIREed said:
Paranoid Android is probably top 3 of my all time favorite ROMs, my backup nexus 5 just suffered an accident (*silently cries* ) but that lead me to this thought...is there anybody out there who can and is willing to maintain an unofficial build of paranoid android for the note 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look in to PAC-ROM. I believe it has lots of the features from paranoid.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
phil.culler said:
Look in to PAC-ROM. I believe it has lots of the features from paranoid.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've ran PAC, great ROM, but Im actually kinda interested in the new PA feature hover, as well
i'm sure it will be on PAC rom real soon if its in PA beta now
So what if we just flash the one for n9005? With an Aosp compatible kernel.
_INSPIREed said:
I've ran PAC, great ROM, but Im actually kinda interested in the new PA feature hover, as well
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"hover" is listed in the features for PAC Rom, I just checked. Looks like an awesome ROM
You could also try out Temasek's Unofficial CM11 builds, LOVE them. First ROM I have been with for such a long time. If you want info, his Twitter handle is @temasek71