I ran Quadrant Pro at 1802mhz on the CPU and 512mhz on the GPU (Franco Kernel & Jelly Belly ROM)
This was the result.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Did your phone explode? Because I don't see a picture.
And you posted this here..... Why?
Slemhelge said:
I ran Quadrant Pro at 1802mhz on the CPU and 512mhz on the GPU (Franco Kernel & Jelly Belly ROM)
This was the result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats lousy! id be embarrassed to show that off to people. i suggest a kernel change. anyways, that post does not belong here in development, nor anywhere near development heres trinity at 1728mhz..
simms22 said:
thats lousy! id be embarrassed to show that off to people. i suggest a kernel change heres trinity at 1728mhz..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMAO! Damn you simms
can't beat simms at his own game =P
First off, that's embarrassingly low. I've gotten 4,000+ at 1.6GHz. Second why the hell did you post that in this section? I thought you needed 10 posts to post in a dev forum. Mods please close and OP read the damn rules.
irizwan said:
can't beat simms at his own game =P
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, unfortunately not true though. there are a few that know how.
i just think that anybody running at 1802mhz should know how to propery use it or not be allowed to run that high of an oc. i mean, the op isnt getting any benefit from it unless you call a higher rate of battery loss a benefit. learn how to benefit from a high oc like this, or dont use it. its pointless to show off that youre using a high oc if a slightly oc'd(1344mhz kernel) can run laps around your phone. dont get me wrong, i know that franco kernel is capable, but this does it no justice.
simms22 said:
thats lousy! id be embarrassed to show that off to people. i suggest a kernel change. anyways, that post does not belong here in development, nor anywhere near development heres trinity at 1728mhz..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
trinity FTW!
Then someone do tell me a good kernel and how to do a proper OC thats stable, efficient etc etc.. Im **** at OC'ing.. i just put franco kernel 512mhz and was allowed the option to go 1802mhz, which ive never seen before..
What development are you doing here?
None? Then why is it posted in development?!!
Thread moved
FNM
Slemhelge said:
Then someone do tell me a good kernel and how to do a proper OC thats stable, efficient etc etc.. Im **** at OC'ing.. i just put franco kernel 512mhz and was allowed the option to go 1802mhz, which ive never seen before..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco Kernel is a great kernel, yo must be doing wrong. I have achieved that score with franco's at 1.3 OC and Stock JB ROM...
Slemhelge said:
Then someone do tell me a good kernel and how to do a proper OC thats stable, efficient etc etc.. Im **** at OC'ing.. i just put franco kernel 512mhz and was allowed the option to go 1802mhz, which ive never seen before..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try them all, or a few different kernels at least. every phone is different, and will react differently to different kernels. also, just because you can oc to 1802, doesnt mean that your phone will properly handle it. at this point, it looks like you arent getting any of the gain from this high oc(some loss actually), but are going through your battery like you are. first off, at that high oc, turn off thermal throttling if you are going to benchmark. play with adjusting voltages until you find your sweet spot at that oc. try ocing less too, your phone might not like 1802, or 1700, or 1600.. not many phones do. also, when you benchmark, benchmark with your hiest cpu speed/highest cpu speed(1802/1802) so that you dont scale and actually bench 1802mhz.
simms22 said:
turn off thermal throttling if you are going to benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the key point that I believe the OP forgot to do.
IAmAN00bie said:
This is the key point that I believe the OP forgot to do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very likely youre right.
Not even worth overclocking honestly.
Only for benchmark scores, your phone most likely doesn't run that much faster.
I Am Marino said:
Not even worth overclocking honestly.
Only for benchmark scores, your phone most likely doesn't run that much faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
funny, only people that dont overclock say that, i guess they really do believe it for themselves. but in reality, there is a difference. if its a slight overclock, its not that different. when its a big overclock, the difference can be dramatic.
simms22 said:
funny, only people that dont overclock say that, i guess they really do believe it for themselves. but in reality, there is a difference. if its a slight overclock, its not that different. when its a big overclock, the difference can be dramatic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have overclocked before, I've done it before on the GNex as well.
I mean it was a huge increase of ability to a single core phone and early dual cores but for a phone already seemingly perfect on the software side, the phone already screams as stock clock speeds.
Besides, is it worth the probable loss of battery life? A marginally higher benchmark score? Things opening 1 or 2ms faster?
This is all just my opinion, I have no hard facts behind all this, but at least in my own personal testing and experimenting, there was no obvious benefit.
Provided you might be right, I've never OC'ed past 1.5, but beyond that, what's the effect on the health of the hardware, and like I said, battery life?
I could be totally wrong and I'm not against admitting being wrong.
Just personal preference I guess.
I Am Marino said:
I have overclocked before, I've done it before on the GNex as well.
I mean it was a huge increase of ability to a single core phone and early dual cores but for a phone already seemingly perfect on the software side, the phone already screams as stock clock speeds.
Besides, is it worth the probable loss of battery life? A marginally higher benchmark score? Things opening 1 or 2ms faster?
This is all just my opinion, I have no hard facts behind all this, but at least in my own personal testing and experimenting, there was no obvious benefit.
Provided you might be right, I've never OC'ed past 1.5, but beyond that, what's the effect on the health of the hardware, and like I said, battery life?
I could be totally wrong and I'm not against admitting being wrong.
Just personal preference I guess.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed. i myself use stock frequencies on franco kernel i've used almost all kernels and roms possible but now i've stuck with aokp n franco smooth even when under-clocked to 1 Ghz. i find no point of oc'ing other than just benchmarking usually get 3.4-3.3K on quadrant with normal freq.
simms22 said:
funny, only people that dont overclock say that, i guess they really do believe it for themselves. but in reality, there is a difference. if its a slight overclock, its not that different. when its a big overclock, the difference can be dramatic.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your phone spends most of its life in the 350/700mhz range.
Signed,
An Overclocker
Related
*SOLVED*
Milestone Overclock - a free download from the marketplace does now support the Defy. Quadrant shows promising figures for sure.
Just wondering whether anyone has gotten the Defy to Overclock?
I've been trying some Droid Overclock apps as well as purchasing Set CPU.
I've successfully rooted my phone which is a requirement for enabling overclocking features. Set CPU won't even start.
None of the apps I've tried have been working properly.
Any tips?
in developement
Look on the milestone overclock googlecode page, its on the todo list
good to know
Yepp, thanx a lot. Since the chipset has clear OC potential this will be very interesting. Especially if the Defy has an omap3630 core, we'll see.
dave79 said:
Yepp, thanx a lot. Since the chipset has clear OC potential this will be very interesting. Especially if the Defy has an omap3630 core, we'll see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty confident that it does indeed have a 3630: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=9540564&postcount=34
Not only because of the screenshot from windows, but look at how close it is to the Droid X, running a 1ghz 3630.
Wow! and getting that benchmark score while running on 800MHz is quite impressive. I've got good hopes that a ported Milestone Overclock will unleash the raw power the phone truly possess.
And this is not the best defy can do. Actually 1117 has been reported from 2 users (one is me).
Im not sure how this phone is so amazing, and so cheap at the same time
umm yeah anyways, just wanted to say i got quadrant scored of around 1110 to 1118 ish i think- after task killing
Really hoping for some custom 2.2 roms in the near future, like some others said it will make this probably -one of- the best androids out there
xdaid said:
And this is not the best defy can do. Actually 1117 has been reported from 2 users (one is me).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My personal best is 1104
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Whoa, nice one, Higgsy!
Sorensiim said:
Whoa, nice one, Higgsy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
weeeeell to be fair there was a little cheat there, that was with JIT enabled. But JIT by the standard method wasn't stable, at first it was fine but then after ab out an hour I started to get random force closes, so I reverted. Its a little insight to what can be achieved with JIT. IMO I'll take JIT over a 1GHZ overclock.
Could anyone of you guys share your benchmark results after running Milestone Overclock? I'm now running on 1.2GHz and it's stable
xdaid said:
And this is not the best defy can do. Actually 1117 has been reported from 2 users (one is me).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My first benchmark result was in mid 1000 but after a restart I got that score too.
To use JIT is better wait for froyo because have it in native form. There are a appl called JITTER in the market but I think that isn't reliable. (I don't know about other appl similar than)
Now I use the Milestone Overclock beta4 and configure the oc at 1000/56
Someone have better configuration to use? Can explain why?
Hey guys.. Overclocked my Defy with the Milestone Overclock. 1200/66
Got a 1438 benchmark on Quadrant Standard. Putting the vsel any lower got my Device to reboot.
After trying it out I switched back to 1000/52 because some users said that running on 66vsel could damage the CPU.
Main effect I had: Launcher runs very smooth, My battery life went down to 24 hours (37h before).
With 1000/52 I still get a benchmark around 1247
Works for me because I´m saving battery and still got enough power to have a smooth launcher.
But: Can anyone please tell me what the standard settings are ? *lol* Forgot them 800Mhz an vsel=???
Thx in advance.
Daniel (from germany)
Daniel.Stevens said:
Hey guys.. Overclocked my Defy with the Milestone Overclock. 1200/66
Got a 1438 benchmark on Quadrant Standard. Putting the vsel any lower got my Device to reboot.
After trying it out I switched back to 1000/52 because some users said that running on 66vsel could damage the CPU.
Main effect I had: Launcher runs very smooth, My battery life went down to 24 hours (37h before).
With 1000/52 I still get a benchmark around 1247
Works for me because I´m saving battery and still got enough power to have a smooth launcher.
But: Can anyone please tell me what the standard settings are ? *lol* Forgot them 800Mhz an vsel=???
Thx in advance.
Daniel (from germany)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Someone in the other thread was running 800/38, I haven't tried it because like you 1000/52 gives me better battery life than stock and more power on top.
Higgsy said:
Someone in the other thread was running 800/38, I haven't tried it because like you 1000/52 gives me better battery life than stock and more power on top.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for answering ;0)
I just wanted to know the original settings in case I wanted to restore them someday.
Or do I just have to click on "unload module" for that ?!? (I gues that´s it I was just to blind/dumb to see it *lol*)
Thx ;0)
Daniel.Stevens said:
Thanks for answering ;0)
I just wanted to know the original settings in case I wanted to restore them someday.
Or do I just have to click on "unload module" for that ?!? (I gues that´s it I was just to blind/dumb to see it *lol*)
Thx ;0)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah just unload module and untick apply on boot and your back to stock
Im currently running 1100MHZ with a 58vsel, seems stable so far and got a quadrant benchmark of 1317. But i am wondering if this setting is safe for long term use, I need my phone to last till the end of this conract
State your ROM w/version, your CPU in GHz, and your kernel (if changed)...
HTC Incredible 2 - Stock OTA (Gingerbread 2.3.3):
Linpack: 42 Mflops
Quadrant: 1550
Sunspider: 3,350 ms
HTC Incredible 2 - Stock (Froyo 2.2.1):
Linpack: 37 Mflops
Quadrant: 1550
Sunspider: 6,200 ms
About: I could not find an official Incredible 2 benchmark thread. Now that ROM development is progressing, why not start one? So many comments are made about how fast a ROM feels, and I know that raw numbers don't completely convey this, but a comparison would still be beneficial. Please do three runs of each, and average them.
The main 3 benchmarks I'll start with is Linpack, Quadrant (both apps), and Sunspider (web browser JS benchmark).
HTC Bliss 3.5.
Quadrant- 1450
Linpack- Around 40
Quadrant: Don't CARE.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
xHoLyx said:
Quadrant: Don't CARE.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was hoping somebody from the bandwagon would come make a useless reply -___-;
MIUI 1.9.2 stock kernel with no overclock
Quadrant: 2051
Miui 1.9.12 tiamat 1.1.1 kernel at 1.88 ghz, 3300 avg quadrant score, 42mflops aggressive linpack
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
I really hope I'm not opening the troll floodgates, but why would you want to overclock your phone?
Doesn't it sacrifice battery life? What applications require OC'ing?
sixteen2nd said:
I really hope I'm not opening the troll floodgates, but why would you want to overclock your phone?
Doesn't it sacrifice battery life? What applications require OC'ing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its like cars man. People like numbers. Its kind of a **** stretching competition. My phones faster than yours, my phone has more Ghz.
This OP stated nothing about overclocking, just how different ROMs ran in comparison.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk
ph1nn said:
State your ROM w/version, your CPU in GHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This to me implies OC'ing.
This is my highest score. I was using CM7 and JDKernal. I believe I was at 1.8GHz.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
JAS_21 said:
This is my highest score. I was using CM7 and JDKernal. I believe I was at 1.8GHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's insane for the Dinc2. I'm looking forward to a conservative overclock on a stable AOSP rom once I can get one. CM7, or OMFGB. I've had problems with OMFGB though so I went back to stock.
I've seen 49 Mflops linpack at 1.5GHz.
Unoffical AOKP ICS, aerovans 10.5 kernel. OC'd at 1.5Ghz
Quadrant: 2291
Linpack: 44 Mflops
Sunspider: Wasnt working, so no result
sixteen2nd said:
This to me implies OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about comparing performance implies OC'ing? If you want to compare 2 cars do you have to increase their horsepower first? To me this thread is more about comparing benchmarks on different roms with similar clock speeds (OC or not) to allow people to get an idea of how one might compare to another performance wise.
Unofficial Aokp build 38 - aerovan v10.5 - 1113600khz - smart ass v2 - -1 step across the board for voltage
Linpack: 37.712 mflops in 2.22 seconds
Quadrant: 1726
*Edit* kHz not ghz.... I would be holding records probably for decades if not over a century if my phone was overclocked to 1.1million ghz. Lol
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Pretty sure its been proven benchmarks are useless in measuring phone performance.
frankspin said:
Pretty sure its been proven benchmarks are useless in measuring phone performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They surely aren't "useless" but they don't mean everything. If a phone gets a 2000 quadrant score it most likely will outperform a phone that gets 1500.
Sent from my ICS Dinc2
cstone1991 said:
They surely aren't "useless" but they don't mean everything. If a phone gets a 2000 quadrant score it most likely will outperform a phone that gets 1500.
Sent from my ICS Dinc2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I post that I got a 2500 how do you know what I have going on with my phone? That is my point and the point of people who have called out scores. I can leave the phone completely bare with nothing going on and OC it well beyond comfort level just to get a higher score.
frankspin said:
If I post that I got a 2500 how do you know what I have going on with my phone? That is my point and the point of people who have called out scores. I can leave the phone completely bare with nothing going on and OC it well beyond comfort level just to get a higher score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But that's the fun in overclocking....seeing what you can get out of it. I used to be a big PC overclocker as well.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
frankspin said:
If I post that I got a 2500 how do you know what I have going on with my phone? That is my point and the point of people who have called out scores. I can leave the phone completely bare with nothing going on and OC it well beyond comfort level just to get a higher score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's true. You just have to take benchmarks with a grain of salt and look at the other info given. If it doesn't look right then there's probably something up.
Sent from my ICS Dinc2
What is everyone's problem? If the guy wants to have a thread of benchmarks, and you aren't interested, skip the ****ing thread and read something else. I, for one, would find some interest in a thread like this. On the flip side, I don't have any reason to read the thread about flashing other radios, but I also don't post in the thread saying the OP is stupid for creating the thread.
With that being said - maybe people can add a brief statement regarding if the rom they are posting about has been running on their phone for a while (ie, loaded with daily apps) or if it is a clean load.
opeth2112 said:
What is everyone's problem? If the guy wants to have a thread of benchmarks, and you aren't interested, skip the ****ing thread and read something else. I, for one, would find some interest in a thread like this. On the flip side, I don't have any reason to read the thread about flashing other radios, but I also don't post in the thread saying the OP is stupid for creating the thread.
With that being said - maybe people can add a brief statement regarding if the rom they are posting about has been running on their phone for a while (ie, loaded with daily apps) or if it is a clean load.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you weren't going to say it, I was, I'm interested in peoples results
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda app-developers app
Post up your AnTuTu Benchmark scores! Please only post up screenshots for verification purposes.
Thanks to you zedomax! I am running just his kernel, without a custom ROM on top, and I love this thing. It is rock stable at 1.6GHz.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this sure looks like, at least for now, I am the highest score on AnTuTu with an E4GT. Am I right?
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
pwnt
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Stock kernel FTW
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
viperROM (LoStKernel Exp) with 1.6Ghz OC & GPU OC.
Just imagine if we could get the 60fps cap off our phones
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
ahl395 said:
^Holy crap! How did you get up to 1696Mhz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Sid 6.7 said:
I guess that's what I get for trying, but I did say to limit this to E4GT only, so the SGS2 with the 7700+ doesn't count.
I will also state I ran mine exactly the same way I run it every day, with widgets running and such. SO I will go back and tweak what I can and see what I get. At the time, though, I thought it was cool.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is an E4GT.
R1ptide said:
Stock kernel, tegrak app, stable
Mine is an E4GT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Sid 6.7 said:
Pardon me, I misread.
So how about some advice and pointers? Your RAM is one thing that is killing me, and if I were able to get 1650-1700MHz I figure the CPU figures will help themselves. My read/write is dead on with yours. So what do I do to get to those speeds and that much free RAM? I am running Tegrak as well. And other than the zedomax kernel and root, everything else is stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't trust any kernel that isn't based off of stock pulled at this point. I have social hub, media hub, and all the drm apps frozen. I think I have the odexed nociq mod but that might've gone away when I had to revert to a nandroid backup not sure. Don't use a live wallpaper.. That's about all I can think of really. Every phone is different so we could have the exact same setup and get different scores.
stangdriverdoug said:
I just got a 7326 on Chris's latest exp. Kernel at 1.6 and i don't know how to take a screen shot lol.
Samsung Galaxy S II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you serious?
If you are press home and power at the same time
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I got this
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
This is the best I can do...
Samsung Galaxy S II
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Not to bad!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
trying to break 7800
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
lse4 said:
How do ya get your ram so high? Does launchers slow the phones down? I'm running the lostkernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use the stock kernel and stock launcher so I don't know really
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
JoeBruin32 said:
Jeez, I can't much higher than 5900 at 1600min/max mhz, performance gov, calk rom, lost kernal.. it looks like my CPU float-point and integer are crap compared to you guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the same setup... 1.6GHz max, performance gov, calkulin's rom, lost kernel 1.0.0.8. got similar score in 5900 range. then I flashed zedomax 6.02, same story... something in calkulin's rom isnt liking our overclocking.
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
R1ptide said:
try the pulled kernel and tegrak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you recommending chris' stock pulled repacked with cwm, or his eg30plus?
edit: not even breaking 5400 on stock + tegrak @ 1.452
I'm currently on CM10+LeanKernel, and while my battery life is great as it is I was just curious to hear other opinions/settings/etc.
Now, I know this obviously varies greatly across each and every device, but I just wanted to get an idea of what generally works well for everyone?
I would try it out on my own but ever since coming from my Vibrant (It worked great with UV at first, but it would slowly but surely just not take to it anymore and I eventually just had to stick with stock voltage settings), I'm sort of hesitant to get started without others opinions.
Thanks in advance everyone!
Anyone...?
boothten said:
I'm currently on CM10+LeanKernel, and while my battery life is great as it is I was just curious to hear other opinions/settings/etc.
Now, I know this obviously varies greatly across each and every device, but I just wanted to get an idea of what generally works well for everyone?
I would try it out on my own but ever since coming from my Vibrant (It worked great with UV at first, but it would slowly but surely just not take to it anymore and I eventually just had to stick with stock voltage settings), I'm sort of hesitant to get started without others opinions.
Thanks in advance everyone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I lower my voltage to reduce the heat being generated. I go about 125 across the board with lean and faux kernel.
And using the stress test feature on SetCPU it goes forever without rebooting so i feel comfortable with stability.
Honestly if you run supercharger scripts, remove bloat, you can keep core clocks to around 1.25max and 485 the lowest without any jitters or pauses, from my recent testing. This was on FreeGS3R6 and Trinity Kernel
I did not however find out what the lowest max clock-speed was before i noticed any slowdowns in user experience....but i will now be looking into this!
xgp0006 said:
Honestly if you run supercharger scripts, remove bloat, you can keep core clocks to around 1.25max and 485 the lowest without any jitters or pauses, from my recent testing. This was on FreeGS3R6 and Trinity Kernel
I did not however find out what the lowest max clock-speed was before i noticed any slowdowns in user experience....but i will now be looking into this!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All supercharger does is change minfree values. OOM groupings and things with memory. No CPU tweaks are happening. Just clarifying
I would be very careful with UV as it can cause permanent damage to the chips. I think I undervolted my gs3 too much and ever since then my phone has been laggy no matter what rom I flash.
atikis_maximus said:
I would be very careful with UV as it can cause permanent damage to the chips. I think I undervolted my gs3 too much and ever since then my phone has been laggy no matter what rom I flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive done some research before i started undervolting and this is the first time im hearing of such a claim.
Im running LiquidSmooth with ktoonsez kernel and im smooth without reboots with -125mV across the board.
With faux i was stable to only -100mV
GiZZy said:
Ive done some research before i started undervolting and this is the first time im hearing of such a claim.
Im running LiquidSmooth with ktoonsez kernel and im smooth without reboots with -125mV across the board.
With faux i was stable to only -100mV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I researched as well, and only read that overvolting(to increase performance) was the only thing to cause a chip to loose life cycle. Not performance.
my undervolt settings
Im testing out l.k. for a couple days and thought id sgare my voltages
1900mhz-1280mv
1809-1250
1728-1150
1674-1100
1512-1075
1458-1050
1350-1025
1242-1000
1134-975
1026-925
918-900
810-875
702-825
594-800
486-800
394-800
These were my voltages on ktoonsez kernal and they were completely stable.also on sio.ondemand il post later with my battery results
carhustler said:
Im testing out l.k. for a couple days and thought id sgare my voltages
1900mhz-1280mv
1809-1250
1728-1150
1674-1100
1512-1075
1458-1050
1350-1025
1242-1000
1134-975
1026-925
918-900
810-875
702-825
594-800
486-800
394-800
These were my voltages on ktoonsez kernal and they were completely stable.also on sio.ondemand il post later with my battery results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so far your voltages have not given me any issues....i have Trials2 the game which ill be testing in a few hours and see if i have any issues jumping in and outta the game through various tasks and let people know....as far as general use these voltages are working spiffy indeed!
after my game testing ill see if i can drop any of them lower and run the test again. but certainly digging this!
Im on Codename(Android)3.6.6 its DAMN fast rom...
elesbb said:
I lower my voltage to reduce the heat being generated. I go about 125 across the board with lean and faux kernel.
And using the stress test feature on SetCPU it goes forever without rebooting so i feel comfortable with stability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I gave your settings a shot, it worked well for maybe 15 minutes? Left my phone alone for a bit, then turned my screen on again and noticed a MASSIVE amount of lag. Rebooted to get my stock voltage settings.
I'm now at -50 across the board, and seem to be pretty stable.
I've already seen some benefits from just that little UV as well.
Before the UV, I was getting ~20-25 hours on one charge. (Again, for those curious, I'm on CM10+LeanKernel.)
After UV: sitting at 61% and going on 20 hours and 19 min.
This is with Wi-Fi/GPS/sync on, auto brightness, OC at 1.67ghz.
Light-Medium usage, lots of texting, random checking of email/Facebook/instagram.
I'm definitely gonna experiment and see what my thresholds/limits are.
I'm pretty sure I can push it more.
GiZZy said:
Ive done some research before i started undervolting and this is the first time im hearing of such a claim.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, same here lolol
carhustler said:
Im testing out l.k. for a couple days and thought id sgare my voltages
1900mhz-1280mv
1809-1250
1728-1150
1674-1100
1512-1075
1458-1050
1350-1025
1242-1000
1134-975
1026-925
918-900
810-875
702-825
594-800
486-800
394-800
These were my voltages on ktoonsez kernal and they were completely stable.also on sio.ondemand il post later with my battery results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice man, I'll give these a shot! Thanks!
I'm contemplating making a really simple image/chart with stable under volt statistics, and their respective ROM/kernel combinations.
Sent using buttery goodness.
At the very end, my dumb ass tried adjusting my UV even lower. No idea why, I genuinely wasn't thinking though. But yeah, it crashed on me which is why it randomly drops off like that.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
-
But yeah.
41 hours on a single charge.
Wi-Fi and GPS are both on.
This is on auto brightness. This is also with lots of texting/instagram/facebook/tapatalk.
I forgot to close out of Chrome, which is why it was my main drain.
This is with me overclocking at 1.72ghz, and really light UV at -50mV across the board.
I know for a fact I can go more aggressive while still keeping it stable.
I have an XPERIA Arc LT15i. Single-core 1-GHz processor, 512 MB of RAM (much less available to the user, though). I've tried different ROMs, and the highest that I'd ever got on the Antutu benchmark was somewhere in the 5000s. Usually, though, it hovers between 4400 and 4800-ish. I tried a CM10-based MIUI ROM a while back, however, and the Antutu scores were completely off the charts.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I'm wondering how it's possible for a 1-GHz single-core processor to match a much superior (dual-core) processor (the Optimus 2X) in terms of performance. Or are these benchmarks, which the myriads of review sites out there use to make comparisons between phones, actually rubbish? I'd love to have some clarifications/opinions.
On arc s overclocked to 1.6 running CM10 and a Fusion kernel I'm getting 6250 without rebooting before benchmark and with a few processes running in a background.
edit
I'll try with stock 1.4 and report results.
edit
6148 on 1.4ghz. Also keep in mind that anyone can install a GB rom with kernel that supports overclocking up to 2.0ghz to get even bigger score. Arc s is still a pretty capable device.
edit
Oh you were talking about arc not arc s xD But my point is still true because there is only 400mhz of difference between these phones.
NEVER use Antutu or any other benchmark tools to determine the performance. Benchmark score can easily get cheated by overclocking, increasing memory read ahead or using different IO scheduler
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
if I helped press thanks :good::good::good:
NEVER use Antutu or any other benchmark tools to determine the performance. Benchmark score can easily get cheated by overclocking, increasing memory read ahead or using different IO scheduler
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But its not cheating... I agree that benchmarks are not really that accurate and every score should be taken with a grain of salt but overclocking is not cheating. Cheating would be making a modifications to antutu apk for bigger scores.
Thank you for your opinions. However, I've never overclocked the processor on my phone to this date. The mere thought gives me the jitters. What if it burns out? Going by those scores, maybe the ROM overclocked the processor itself without my knowing. Have any of you tried overclocking, though? And, have you noticed any difference in performance or stability issues? Maybe the battery would drain out quicker, too.
MarcSinger said:
Thank you for your opinions. However, I've never overclocked the processor on my phone to this date. The mere thought gives me the jitters. What if it burns out? Going by those scores, maybe the ROM overclocked the processor itself without my knowing. Have any of you tried overclocking, though? And, have you noticed any difference in performance or stability issues? Maybe the battery would drain out quicker, too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have read my previous post you would know everything that you asked. On CM10 I'm getting more than 6000 points in antutu without any overclocking (arc s CPU's frequency is 1.4ghz) : D Its not that scores on CM10 are high its just that scores on stock firmware are low. Sony's software is bloated and ****ty in overall.
Overclocking is safe if you are doing it with brain. If you set Arc CPU (1ghz) to 2ghz it will fry for sure but setting it to 1.2 should be perfectly safe. Overclocked phone drains battery faster but its pretty obvious everything is stable and a little smoother.
pypcier said:
If you have read my previous post you would know everything that you asked. On CM10 I'm getting more than 6000 points in antutu without any overclocking (arc s CPU's frequency is 1.4ghz) : D Its not that scores on CM10 are high its just that scores on stock firmware are low. Sony's software is bloated and ****ty in overall.
Overclocking is safe if you are doing it with brain. If you set Arc CPU (1ghz) to 2ghz it will fry for sure but setting it to 1.2 should be perfectly safe. Overclocked phone drains battery faster but its pretty obvious everything is stable and a little smoother.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I would NOT have known everything that I'd asked. My question was whether there were any stability or battery-drain issues with overclocking, but none of those queries were addressed on your previous post.
But thanks for the clarifications on the scores. Yes, stock ICS is absolute rubbish, that's why I've moved on to CM10/Jelly Bean. It doesn't have the "customizations" you can get with stock ICS, but it's smooth, responsive, fluid, and that's what matters to me.
By the way, I do believe 400 MHz SHOULD make quite a bit of a difference. A 600-MHz processor and a 1-GHz processor wouldn't be giving a similar performance. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Overclocking your Arc to 1.4GHz should be a clearly visible upgrade but I'm not sure if this would be healthy for your phone. It's almost 50% more in performance but under heavy load this could cause some high temperatures and degradation of your phone's battery and cpu life. My Arc s is clocked at 1.6 all the time and it doesn't even gets too hot while playing games so 200MHz more seems right and safe to me.
edit
Values described in this post as "safe" or "best" may not be the same for you so google everything before making any changes to your phone.