Related
Alright, I'm sure this has come across many peoples minds. Which is better? Cm9, or the new official ICS release from LG. Give us your input!
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda premium
Those loving roms and a bit vanilla will always like cm better than stock!
Skickat från min LG-P936 via Tapatalk 2
I am getting much better battery life and performance using the ics leak. But I miss a lot of the features that were available on CM9.
Battery backup
Battery back-up on stock battery now rocking high on the ICS leak 1Day and 5hrs and still kicking.The new power save feature is also ausome.
Same thing here. Much better overall performance and battery life with ICS leak, compared to CM9. Used it for couple days, and there is not a single reason that I can see to go back to CM9.
This is what I've found:
ICS Advantages:
Proper driver support
Excellent UI
Better battery life
More responsive interface
CM9 Advantages:
No bloatware
Open architecture allows for more tweaking
AOSP apps
Constant improvement
Push:
In-app performance
I've found the leaked ICS more than stable enough to be a daily driver. In fact, in 3 days of usage I've had no more problems than any stock firmware build I've ever had in a phone. Heck, it's got fewer problems than the stock GB build did.
On the other hand, CM9 is *not* stable or polished enough to be a daily driver for me. The biggest problem was there were issues that were keeping the phone awake even when not used and absolutely killing battery life. Processes not being killed off properly, sensor issues, backlight and radio problems, the list went on.
YMMV, obviously - some people have had way fewer problems with CM9. It's just not the case for me.
mith13 said:
Battery back-up on stock battery now rocking high on the ICS leak 1Day and 5hrs and still kicking.The new power save feature is also ausome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is awesome! You guys with ICS are making me jealous. I'll have to wait for an official release as I'm not comfortable upgrading it like y'all on my own.
Have to agree. Stock ROM is actually impressive. Fluid, and even rootable, so I got rid of what bloatware there was (which really was not a lot to begin with).
On that note, does anyone know how I can switch from CM9 to the new ICS, step by step? And also, How can I still keep all my stuff? I'm not sure if Titanium Backup will work or not on CM9, I heard it had issues.
I'm personally gonna stick with CM9 because it's more than stable enough for me and constantly improving. But switching from CM9 to LG ICS is as easy as putting the phone in download mode and running the 1-click installer.
Backing up app data via TiBU should be fine. Just don't restore system data when you are in LG ICS.
Sent from my LG-P930 using Tapatalk 2
Installing LG's ICS is easy. It's getting back to CM9 (or any other ROM) that is difficult.
I haven't really had any issues with cm9 nightly. Ive been running it as my daily driver and it does a good job and my battery life goes to about 18 hours with heavy usage (extended battery). im thinking about going to ICS leak but i really enojoy the way that im able to tweak clock speeds (specially past 1.5GHz), tweak the memory and apply themes on cm9 (I dislike looking at the same thing for a while **coughcoughiphonecoughcough**) Hope to see a kernel and custom rom for atleast the leaked ICS. Its a loud call but will is it loud enough? :-/
drumist said:
Installing LG's ICS is easy. It's getting back to CM9 (or any other ROM) that is difficult.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What exactly is difficult? It's too easy, just requires a little more manipulation.
Machzelet said:
What exactly is difficult? It's too easy, just requires a little more manipulation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah mate !!
special thanks to your supereasy guide !
""devs/people at xda consider these things as hurdles, not dead ends""
Switched from CM9 to ICS and so far....
I'm not really liking it. Might be because of the difficulty it gave me with TiBu, or maybe its because I can't use the volume buttons to change tracks on poweramp anymore. Then there's the cartoony lool and lack of CWM. I don't know, but it just rubs me the wrong way right now.
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda premium
No CWM: back to CM9
I want to go back from the leaked ICS release to CM9, but without CWM working, how do i do it? do i need to use the unbricking method? i would rather not since it looks like a nightmare. I have backups from CWM on my sd card of both stock and CM9, and my Nitro is rooted on the new leak. someone please help!
SergioFern said:
I want to go back from the leaked ICS release to CM9, but without CWM working, how do i do it? do i need to use the unbricking method? i would rather not since it looks like a nightmare. I have backups from CWM on my sd card of both stock and CM9, and my Nitro is rooted on the new leak. someone please help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same exact situation. Anyone know how?
SergioFern said:
I want to go back from the leaked ICS release to CM9, but without CWM working, how do i do it? do i need to use the unbricking method? i would rather not since it looks like a nightmare. I have backups from CWM on my sd card of both stock and CM9, and my Nitro is rooted on the new leak. someone please help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have root, you only need to follow the LAST steps of the unbricking guide -- starting from the heading "Restoring the original Nitro HD images" on the guide. Doing the stuff before that is just wasting your time.
If you don't have root (and can't get it to root), then you'd have to follow the full guide.
Edit: Please only attempt these steps if you know what you're doing. There may be unforeseen complications because the new ICS ROM is not fully understood at this point in time. Don't blame me if your phone stops working.
possibly
drumist said:
If you have root, you only need to follow the LAST steps of the unbricking guide -- starting from the heading "Restoring the original Nitro HD images" on the guide. Doing the stuff before that is just wasting your time.
If you don't have root (and can't get it to root), then you'd have to follow the full guide.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Going to try this, maybe tomorrow. I will update with results. Thanks for the help!
SergioFern said:
Going to try this, maybe tomorrow. I will update with results. Thanks for the help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please notice my edit to my last post. Some people have had issues returning to CM9 while others have been able to do it without any issues. Just be aware that there is still some uncertainty with what exactly the leaked ICS ROM has modified.
I think that Jelly Bean feels faster and more lightweight.Do you guys believe that Jelly Bean development would be faster for our wildfire and Jelly Bean could run faster and smoother than the current efforts that are made such as AOKP ICS?
Well, let's see it come first... I'd love to see JB on Wildy but not getting me hopes high.
And well, if it would come... We are talking bout CM10 then as the Cyanogen team has confirmed (JB on CM10).
Let's first complete the task of bringing a bug free ics and then move on to jb ;-)
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Well i heard somewhere that some "project butter" or what ever was it should have improved 4.1 so its less laggy etc.. so it may be less laggy, but i think it was still only somekinda cpu max thing so not sure.
Here's a video showing the difference between ICS and JB.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5E5revikUU&feature=player_embedded
well jellybean is way faster and smoother than ics on phones with gpu...as butter project pumps up the sysc desktop flips to 60.....am not sure if that cases our little wildfire to get smoother or slow down....hopefully we will get a better experience on jellybean....but the notification bar will suffer...as its 2 small for handing all those expanded notification infos..
As djpry said, Jelly Bean uses CPU an GPU together to make it faster than ICS. If I remember right, Wildfire as no GPU (or quite at least it doesn't have 3D GPU), so I don't think the speed difference will be noticiable between ICS and JB. Also, ICS uses a lot of GPU acceleration, and Wildfire's SoC seems to run it with difficulty.
pantapanta1 said:
I think that Jelly Bean feels faster and more lightweight.Do you guys believe that Jelly Bean development would be faster for our wildfire and Jelly Bean could run faster and smoother than the current efforts that are made such as AOKP ICS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because of the way that Jelly Bean uses to be faster than Ice Cream Sandwich, it requires a pretty beefy CPU, which the wildfire doesn't have. It would be nice to see CM10 or even any kind of Jelly Bean port on the Wildfire but I doubt it will happen, and even if it does I don't think it'll be considerably faster than the current Ice Cream Sandwich roms floating around.
Now the other day gingerbread came out and its now jellybean lol
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda app-developers app
reply
Our wildfire could use cm9 now . but it have so manyy bugs . i had try . and ! now they release cm10.but i stuck in the boot screen . i think the most important is the GPU . Our wildfire is older now . the cpu could now offer to many works . if it can , propolly there are so many bugs and lagg:highfive:
Anyway . I want my wildfire could touch JB !
calvin951121 said:
Our wildfire could use cm9 now . but it have so manyy bugs . i had try . and ! now they release cm10.but i stuck in the boot screen . i think the most important is the GPU . Our wildfire is older now . the cpu could now offer to many works . if it can , propolly there are so many bugs and lagg:highfive:
Anyway . I want my wildfire could touch JB !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it will dont worry.....but in a little while....
Short answer: ICS.
The Wildfire will probably get Jelly Bean, but don't expect Project Butter to live up to its name. The Wildfire has no GPU at all. I guess this would mean rendering would take place in the CPU, therefore slowing down the operating system.
arco (developer for CyanogenMod on Wildfire) has confirmed CM10 won't be coming to the Wildfire officially, but there are already early ports out there...
epic118 said:
Short answer: ICS.
The Wildfire will probably get Jelly Bean, but don't expect Project Butter to live up to its name. The Wildfire has no GPU at all. I guess this would mean rendering would take place in the CPU, therefore slowing down the operating system.
arco (developer for CyanogenMod on Wildfire) has confirmed CM10 won't be coming to the Wildfire officially, but there are already early ports out there...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure about this but I'm not a developer
The early ports barely boot with lots of problems - but reading the respective threads you'll find out that there's no difference to the early stages of ICS ports.
I had the feeling (not more though) that bottom line they found it already more responsive compared against ICS - but that might also change (i.e. get better - or worser) with all those workarounds to be found and done to get missing things working.
To make that long story short: until everything almost works there won't be any useful prognosis. But there's indeed hope that it might be a bit faster than today's ICS ports.
BTW: nothing above GB will ever come to the Wildfire/Buzz officially anymore - ICS has also been designed for phones with a GPU
I'm currently looking for a ROM base to modify to my needs. I really like the features available in cm but I'm not sure if cm10 (stock) is stable enough for production use yet. Does anyone have experience with this?
Been using it for about a month now and have no issues what so ever, I recommend the builds by Euroskank as he adds some really useful features.
miketoasty said:
Been using it for about a month now and have no issues what so ever, I recommend the builds by Euroskank as he adds some really useful features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I'm looking at adding my own features that I need so I'll be compiling from src
ultimatebuster said:
Thanks! I'm looking at adding my own features that I need so I'll be compiling from src
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even though they are not any RC's yet its pretty stable I have been running a nightly for two weeks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I threw CM10 on mine and I had some radio issues. I don't know the technical details but the signal wouldn't lock in completely. The signal notification on the top bar would never turn blue no matter how perfect signal was, the wifi wouldn't lock in blue either. Reverted to stock for now.
Other than that it was awesome!
unrefine said:
I threw CM10 on mine and I had some radio issues. I don't know the technical details but the signal wouldn't lock in completely. The signal notification on the top bar would never turn blue no matter how perfect signal was, the wifi wouldn't lock in blue either. Reverted to stock for now.
Other than that it was awesome!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FYI - even though your bars are gray, you still have an active data connection. When they turn blue it means they are connected to googles servers
Sorry for OT - but try JBSourcery instead. :good:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1824624&highlight=jbsourcery&page=3
I just got my Verizon GNex about 3 days ago and right when I got it I rooted and put the CM10 preview ROM on it. I haven't found one thing wrong with it yet. Works great for me
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium
You can also try Paranoid Android which has CM10 as its base and this ROM has been very stable for me. This ROM can be used in stock phone layout, phablet, or tablet modes.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I just got my Verizon GNex about 3 days ago and right when I got it I rooted and put the CM10 preview ROM on it. I haven't found one thing wrong with it yet. Works great for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is your battery life? GPS? Still no bugs?
I'm still running Pete's Bugless Beast and its so perfect but just no mods or customization. I want to be able to customize but I don't know that I want to risk losing my bugless JB...
Has anyone compiled cm10 from source with no customizations other than the camera, NFC, and GPS files? How is that build? I'm going to be modifying it for personal and perhaps submit back.
jrizk07 said:
FYI - even though your bars are gray, you still have an active data connection. When they turn blue it means they are connected to googles servers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha, thanks, I still was having issues, but I think it was hardware of 515.10 dropping connection
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
ldp_frog said:
How is your battery life? GPS? Still no bugs?
I'm still running Pete's Bugless Beast and its so perfect but just no mods or customization. I want to be able to customize but I don't know that I want to risk losing my bugless JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPS is perfect. Locks immediately. Battery life is nothing to write home about. I have the official extended battery and with decent use I might get 8hrs if I'm lucky. I'm up for ideas on other JB ROMs for Verizon that have better battery life.
Everything is perfect except for the battery. Almost afraid to flash another ROM because everything on the CM10 preview works for me.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium
I've been using XenonHD ROM for about a month now and find there are many features that were present in CM9! Runs fast and smooth!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1667418
gcantrell said:
I might get 8hrs if I'm lucky. I'm up for ideas on other JB ROMs for Verizon that have better battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JTFC, that's awful. How does it compare with what you had on ICS? I get decent battery life on JB (CM10), but still slightly lower (10-15%) than on CM9, but 1.5 to 2 days is still possible with my use + 3 hours screen on or so over that time. This holds true for all the JB ROMs I've run. 4-5 hours of screen on time over a workday of hard use is still possible for me, but idle drain seems to be hit/miss, some nights 0.25%/hour, other's 1%. Sync seems to be a more of a battery eater on JB, and I haven't bothered running Google Now since the first day or two I ran JB.
Shall see how today's JRO03L build performs.
Running vicious rom, the cm10, great with Franco kernel and his app. No complaints. Only thing is i can't get play music to download to my phone from the cloud
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
CMNein said:
JTFC, that's awful. How does it compare with what you had on ICS? I get decent battery life on JB (CM10), but still slightly lower (10-15%) than on CM9, but 1.5 to 2 days is still possible with my use + 3 hours screen on or so over that time. This holds true for all the JB ROMs I've run. 4-5 hours of screen on time over a workday of hard use is still possible for me, but idle drain seems to be hit/miss, some nights 0.25%/hour, other's 1%. Sync seems to be a more of a battery eater on JB, and I haven't bothered running Google Now since the first day or two I ran JB.
Shall see how today's JRO03L build performs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I don't have anything to compare it to. The GNex was a warranty replacement for my old Thunderbolt. After I got the GNex I immediately rooted and threw the first JB ROM on it I could find. I will keep searching through various threads in the development forum and see what I can come up with.
Oh and thanks for confirming my suspicion that my battery life is below average. The weekend is here. Plenty of time for experimenting
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium
gcantrell said:
Unfortunately I don't have anything to compare it to. The GNex was a warranty replacement for my old Thunderbolt. After I got the GNex I immediately rooted and threw the first JB ROM on it I could find. I will keep searching through various threads in the development forum and see what I can come up with.
Oh and thanks for confirming my suspicion that my battery life is below average. The weekend is here. Plenty of time for experimenting
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA Premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I highly recommend Better Battery Stats if you don't have it already. There's a free XDA version posted on the site, but the Market version is well worth the ~3$ also. Sync and location services (GPS or Google) and Google Now seem to be the biggest offenders on JB. I run sync and location sparingly.
That said, the GN is definitely no battery queen unfortunately :crying:
Well not just 720p but EVERYTHING working.
I was looking at DK's roms the CM10 and CM10 4.2
Are there any others (my used Dinc2 should be arriving in the 28th so i want to get ready to root it, S-OFF, and load some jelly goodness on it.
OR if i should stay on stock for everything to work properly?
Thanks everyone
MoonMaster345 said:
Well not just 720p but EVERYTHING working.
I was looking at DK's roms the CM10 and CM10 4.2
Are there any others (my used Dinc2 should be arriving in the 28th so i want to get ready to root it, S-OFF, and load some jelly goodness on it.
OR if i should stay on stock for everything to work properly?
Thanks everyone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want everything working you'll have to stay stock. Jelly Bean is great but it will always have a few issues no matter what rom you are on.
Dk cm9 works very well with only a few bugs. Working 720 camera as well.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using Tapatalk 2
MoonMaster345 said:
Well not just 720p but EVERYTHING working.
I was looking at DK's roms the CM10 and CM10 4.2
Are there any others (my used Dinc2 should be arriving in the 28th so i want to get ready to root it, S-OFF, and load some jelly goodness on it.
OR if i should stay on stock for everything to work properly?
Thanks everyone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the Incredible HD RLS 2 (ICS 4.0.4 Sense 3.6) ROM if you want it. It real nice and loaded with features. Only problem is that the memory is like maxed out. (cause it pretty much stock) after my first pass through I was able to free up about 60mb. I personally get rid of junk like calander, weather, etc. You can get way smaller apps for these in the app store. After I free up space it ran faster. Me personally... I like to keep mine stock (deodexed of course), debloated, and themed. Mine runs so fast! If you were to go with this I'd recommend a overclocked kernel as well!
SaltYNuTz said:
I have the Incredible HD RLS 2 (ICS 4.0.4 Sense 3.6) ROM if you want it. It real nice and loaded with features. Only problem is that the memory is like maxed out. (cause it pretty much stock) after my first pass through I was able to free up about 60mb. I personally get rid of junk like calander, weather, etc. You can get way smaller apps for these in the app store. After I free up space it ran faster. Me personally... I like to keep mine stock (deodexed of course), debloated, and themed. Mine runs so fast! If you were to go with this I'd recommend a overclocked kernel as well!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What kernel are you suggesting to use for over clocking a sense ROM? I haven't seen anything about custom sense kernels for ICS. If you are referring to using aero's kernels, those are aosp ROMs only.
Sent from my Incredibly Indecisive Dinc2
There is not any custom kernels for sense roms.
NeverSeparate said:
What kernel are you suggesting to use for over clocking a sense ROM? I haven't seen anything about custom sense kernels for ICS. If you are referring to using aero's kernels, those are aosp ROMs only.
Sent from my Incredibly Indecisive Dinc2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry about that.. I never messed with the kernel just assumed it would help and that there was one. (Smacked myself for assuming) lol
SaltYNuTz said:
Sorry about that.. I never messed with the kernel just assumed it would help and that there was one. (Smacked myself for assuming) lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No biggie, just wanted to be sure someone reading this didn't go trying to flash one and freak out when it didn't work and start 4 new threads asking for support.
Sent from my Incredibly Indecisive Dinc2
Are cm9 roms the general go to for stability on the dinc2? I'm getting one for my wife and would like to have an idea of what to throw on it after s-off. I don't need bleeding edge but don't want her stuck on sense either.
sent from my nexus 7 on cm10.1
My other DD is an LG spectrum on cm10
ortrigger said:
Are cm9 roms the general go to for stability on the dinc2? I'm getting one for my wife and would like to have an idea of what to throw on it after s-off. I don't need bleeding edge but don't want her stuck on sense either.
sent from my nexus 7 on cm10.1
My other DD is an LG spectrum on cm10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm7.2 is probably safer. I think all ICS and jb ROMs have slight issues at best due to lack of source. MROM is nice. If she doesn't want to deal with occasional reboots and often flakey cameras (some are pretty stable but results vary), I would stay with gingerbread.
Sent from my Incredibly Indecisive Dinc2
NeverSeparate said:
Cm7.2 is probably safer. I think all ICS and jb ROMs have slight issues at best due to lack of source. MROM is nice. If she doesn't want to deal with occasional reboots and often flakey cameras (some are pretty stable but results vary), I would stay with gingerbread.
Sent from my Incredibly Indecisive Dinc2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the main bugs in ics and jb? Is cm9 stable enough to use as a daily driver?
Sent from my LG spectrum running cm10
ortrigger said:
What are the main bugs in ics and jb? Is cm9 stable enough to use as a daily driver?
Sent from my LG spectrum running cm10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DD is subjective. I have used PAC now for a DD. It has some hiccups occasionally but I work through it.
You should read through some of the threads for more details. Not everyone has the same experience. But you may experience lag, random reboots, camera force closes or a need to clear data to make camera work periodically. You will likely have to manually input APN settings, which only has to be done once so no biggie there. You may have no problem at all. For someone who likes tinkering it isn't a big deal to do those things. But if you are looking for a ROM for someone who just wants it to work, and not have to possibly switch due to issues, and who hates resetting everything like a new phone, gingerbread is more stable. All the ICS and JB ROMs use a hacked gingerbread kernel except for sense ROMs using a stock kernel. There is no custom sense kernel for ICS or jb. And there are some nice sense ROMs on gingerbread also, with great features. And because they are what the phone is meant to run they don't really have issues. I know you say you don't want her "stuck" on sense, but she might like it. Take a look at nits sense ROMs, as well as skyraider zues. I have used zues as a fallback for quite some time. Andy bones had some nice mods for it too. Bottom line, if she doesn't mind a few possible issues try a few and see, but if she just wants it to work right, don't mess with her phone just for your sake.
If you do try some, dk's ROMs and chilly's have been good so far. Not perfect but great work considering lack of source. Hope this helps.
Sent from my Incredibly Indecisive Dinc2
CM7 is rock solid. Everything works.
I'm using an aeroevan kernel and the supercharger script. Also incredicontrol to oc to 1.4GHz.
Flashed the latest Verizon radio.
Rock. Solid.
-CM7 on DInc2
We picked the phone up yesterday and I was pleasantly surprised to find it already s-offed and cm7 installed on it. I don't know about the radios on it. Probably won't mess with it since it's for my wife. Thanks for all the help.
sent from my nexus 7 on cm10.1
my other DD is an LG spectrum on cm10
CM9 VS CM10 Which Better For Gaming , Faster , Mods , Better Kernels and Bettery Life ??
i wanna ANS PLZ
i think slimbean
CM9. With Seeder v5. Using either Castagnal IT kernel or hadi's.
CM10 is not stable enough that's all. Battery lasted 3 days with wifi on.
Underclocked though~
MidoTawfik7 said:
CM9 VS CM10 Which Better For Gaming , Faster , Mods , Better Kernels and Bettery Life ??
i wanna ANS PLZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I'm using CM10 Alpha 3 now and everything I've experienced is far better than what I've experienced with ICS ROMS. JB is absolutely smoother than ICS. Try Slimbean first if you don't wanna waste time downloading just to test things. Apply forfivo's kernel v2 for jb to improve performance.
Just to be honest, even though many users are saying that there's many bugs and issues on cm10, the times you will encounter them are so minimal. And the phone is still fit for daily use. Just take my advice. Try CM10.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2
Galaxy_W_User said:
Have you even used it before comparing it to cm9? I doubt it so what your saying is nothing more than baseless rubbish that cm9 is better tan cm10.
Its a fact that wifi drains the battery and to keep it on all the time is stupid and it takes a really stupid person to not be able to see that cause its been said again and again and again that having it on drains the battery and then you complain that the battery drains fast when you have wifi on all day. Yea I see s a real intelligent person there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all ics and jb rom has been test..cm10 kernel 2.6 and 3.0..and i have 7 difference rom,4 custom kernel on my external sd card..when someone mention about some rom,i flash straight away.try using as long as i satisfied..but cm9 still better on itself..in term of stock cm9 n stock cm10..no mod..
Sent from my GT-I8150 using Tapatalk 2
Galaxy_W_User said:
Have you even used it before comparing it to cm9? I doubt it so what your saying is nothing more than baseless rubbish that cm9 is better tan cm10.
Its a fact that wifi drains the battery and to keep it on all the time is stupid and it takes a really stupid person to not be able to see that cause its been said again and again and again that having it on drains the battery and then you complain that the battery drains fast when you have wifi on all day. Yea I see s a real intelligent person there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please just calm down and stop sounding like you are trying to start a fight for absolutely no reason at all, calling people stupid, everyone is just giving their own opinion, giving an answer. I myself would suggest cm9 too as not all games work properly with jb and its very stable as of now.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
I'm in no means to start argument. But I left it with wifi on for three days to test for battery life.
If you don't connect to the internet much, wifi will barely consume any battery. But if you have any more to say, try having 3G on. My experience is that browsing on the internet with 3G on will even consume battery with AC plugged in.(though that is when I'm still in stock GB)
I keep my wifi on when I'm at home because file updates run better on them. (and is needed for frequent teamviewer usage too)
I did not state the fact that CM10 is worse than CM9, its just stability. And as a person who relies on his phone quite a lot, stability does come before performance.
Thanks for iBlueee and peanutghost(direct translate) for being rational
MidoTawfik7 said:
CM9 VS CM10 Which Better For Gaming , Faster , Mods , Better Kernels and Bettery Life ??
i wanna ANS PLZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 is more stable