Related
This is not my development
Information:
It's half a month since I first post on Neopeek that I managed to boot Android Linux kernel on raph800 from NAND. Although after that I had solved some of the basic and important bugs, I'm now really making progress slow.
Some people have made great suggestion that me making all the source open, and I decide to follow it. So here is it.
Plan to support: raph800,raph100.
Likely to be supported: diam types, other raph types.
Whether a phone type is supported depends on the test mechine used by our project members.That is , if you have a phone other than raph800 or raph100 but joined the develop team, then we are happy to add your device to the support list.
Sorry to say that it's nearly impossible to use git over my Internet connection, so I have to host the project on Google, using a svn repository.
Notice:
I'm not a professional Linux kernel developer and it's my first time to participate in a open source project(not to say that I'm even the creator…Orz), so if I make something wrong or inproperly please do feel free to point that out and I'll correct it.
Please none developers don't bother in this…
Resource and Participating:
Project is hosted here.
You are accepted as a team member only if you can follow the instructions below.
Read about the project status and the TODO list.
Make a positive () patch for the project to prove that you're qualified to develop.
Send your patch to me by mail and if it's accepted, I'll then add your account to the contributor list.
And please anyone who likes the project spread the word about it over the net, thanks!
from http://www.fluyu.com/2011/04/7/Project_Announcement.html
the project on neopeek http://www.neopeek.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=6490
Very nice! Will post some feed back about my experience on my Fuze/aka RAPH110 once I am able to. Glad to see the project being shared on XDA!!!
video:
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMjUyMjI0ODg4.html
one more link:
http://www.neopeek.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=6490
We should please viruscreazy for patch to Camera/Video. Maybe he can help us?
Glad to hear for that, hope to coming soon. I waiting for this too long
good deal! i'll be watching this closely
Oh man now this looks awesome! if they get it to work, i'm going back to my Fuze!
how long the battery can work?
vincentchan said:
how long the battery can work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact same as haret/SD card builds, probably worse. Lots of optimization needs to happen for NAND, on RHOD battery life is way worse presently. Just because it's being flashed onto the phone doesn't mean the work is done...
if anyone is interested i downloaded complate source from google code. You can use it at your own risk. I hope someone will make shortly NBH from this.
http://www.zshare.net/download/89284876bbed3e9a/
This is amazing! I would definitely like to test the build.
mirror:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=FUU8YI4S
majkeljj said:
mirror:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=FUU8YI4S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I had to backtrace you over to neopeek's forum to understand this post, with absolutely no explanation.
Folks, he downloaded the source from jamesallen426's google code site and put it in a 7z file...
It doesn't appear ready to test dude, I really hope you asked jamesallen426 for permission to do this... I would assume if he was ready to test it, he would announce a release and post it...
Oh com'on, he was just thinking of a good way to rid the world of the d-pad devil device (triple-d)
I honestly didn't think it was exactly ready for "prime time" but I was considering flashing when I had the time...
R^7Z said:
Oh com'on, he was just thinking of a good way to rid the world of the d-pad devil device (triple-d)
I honestly didn't think it was exactly ready for "prime time" but I was considering flashing when I had the time...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly. as I wrote "i downloaded complete source from google code" I don't write that it is flash ready, and write that maybe someone can make nbh from this source if he have time and required knowledge. If you want to play with this, here now you have source in one file, you don't need to install additional applications to download source from google code. If we want to push this project forward we need original files to play with them, test something and send to jamesallen426 new files.
Helo. Can anyone tell me what device is Raphael 800? Is it regular HTC Touch Pro GSM version or? Will this work on this device? Tnx.
Sent from my Android using XDA App
I believe RAPH800 is GSM (I could be wrong) but the idea is, we need others to test this that have no problem with their device ending up as a paper weight. As mentioned earlier: by trying this, no one is liable for you destroying your device. Just need testers who know what they are doing and are willing to accept this.
R^7Z said:
I believe RAPH800 is GSM (I could be wrong) but the idea is, we need others to test this that have no problem with their device ending up as a paper weight. As mentioned earlier: by trying this, no one is liable for you destroying your device. Just need testers who know what they are doing and are willing to accept this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RAPH800 is CDMA (Sprint and others). The RAPH100 and 110 are GSM.
I have an HTC fuze here I will give to a developer for testing purposes. Contact me, and I will arrange to send it to you. US-based preferred, just for the shipping convenience.
Thanks.
Let me in! let me in!
R^7Z said:
I believe RAPH800 is GSM (I could be wrong) but the idea is, we need others to test this that have no problem with their device ending up as a paper weight. As mentioned earlier: by trying this, no one is liable for you destroying your device. Just need testers who know what they are doing and are willing to accept this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a spare AT&T Fuze (Raph110) which except for the Touchscreen, everything else is operational. Which means for me it's already a brick anyway (i have 2 other ones), so I have no problem trying out some flashing
Hi ya'll,
I've just added USB host mode support for the Galaxy Tabs. ( Can some mod move this post to the Android developer forum and bless me for posting in that forum? I'm happy to answer questions/discuss but I can't post there yet because I just created this account)
[Ugh! because I have less than eight posts I can't include github links - you'll need to linkify yourself... ]
The github site is here:
github.../humcycles/galaxy-tab-modified
Documentation on the changes:
github.../humcycles/galaxy-tab-modified/blob/master/Kernel/Documentation/usb/s3c-otg-host.txt
The changelist you probably want if you are want to cherry-pick into another kernel tree:
github.../humcycles/galaxy-tab-modified/commit/99388abf98f8b8583dcfb31339c8673a9fea62bd
These changes fix a number of bugs in the Samsung host mode software but are probably not well suited for regular end users. I would recommend that developers who are generating Galaxy Tab kernels consider picking up these changes.
https://github.com/humcycles/galaxy-tab-modified
https://github.com/humcycles/galaxy...ter/Kernel/Documentation/usb/s3c-otg-host.txt
https://github.com/humcycles/galaxy-tab-modified/commit/99388abf98f8b8583dcfb31339c8673a9fea62bd
Links for the lazy..
Wait it so long
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
Does P1000 have the right hw, can it provide 5 volts to usb client or we also need a power injector (usb hub)?
It really works? That would be superb news! Thank you very much for investing your time in it. Can`t wait to see it in a kernel on my tab.
Mjoelnir77 said:
It really works? That would be superb news! Thank you very much for investing your time in it. Can`t wait to see it in a kernel on my tab.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It works for me on a Sprint SPH-P100, but I bet it will work on all 7" tabs (the USB hw seems the same). I look forward to some other dev trying it out and letting me know how it works for them. From looking at the samsung sample code, I bet it will work on most samsung chipset based devices (certainly the S5PC100 based ones).
*** Can some mod move this thread to the Galaxy Tab Development forum and bless me for posting there? ***
mdalacu said:
Does P1000 have the right hw, can it provide 5 volts to usb client or we also need a power injector (usb hub)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bet it will also need power for the 5V USB. In the samsung code they have bits that look like it is turning on the right LDO to have power, but nothing comes out on my SPH-P100. Either the sw init needs more work, or they didn't stuff some part when they built up the units.
[ Ugh - I can only reply once every 5 mins because I don't have enough posts ]
punkgeek said:
Yes. It works for me on a Sprint SPH-P100, but I bet it will work on all 7" tabs (the USB hw seems the same). I look forward to some other dev trying it out and letting me know how it works for them. From looking at the samsung sample code, I bet it will work on most samsung chipset based devices...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does that mean this hasn't actually been tested on a SGT yet?
Blittz said:
Does that mean this hasn't actually been tested on a SGT yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tested it on a few Sprint 7" SGT's here, but it would be great for another dev to try it in their kernel.
It is a great thing, you deserve so many thanks!...
Now what I need is a kernel with usb host and swap enabled.
Can somebody explain why it is needed? What is it good for?
odysseus84 said:
Can somebody explain why it is needed? What is it good for?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It allows the Tab to act as the controller for USB devices, rather than the other way around. In practice, it means that you can use things like usb sticks, keyboards, mice and the like which usually require a computer (the host) with the Tab.
Anyone more knowledgeable, feel free to correct me.
for months I wait this,
SGS also waiting it too, Shall you post in their forum?
zoftdev said:
for months I wait this,
SGS also waiting it too, Shall you post in their forum?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure. And since I haven't seen a mod move this to the right forum yet, I hope ya'll don't mind if I bump up my post count to 10 by replying to this thread. After I have ten posts I can post in their forum.
bumping my post count
bumping my post count
This is great!!
bumping my post count
lol, don`t get banned over this - it is for a good cause, but one never knows if the Mods that see this see it the same way
Mjoelnir77 said:
lol, don`t get banned over this - it is for a good cause, but one never knows if the Mods that see this see it the same way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm - I just want to be able to discuss this in the right forum. I hope I don't get banned, but I don't really care to much - I made these fixes because I needed host mode for my application. I'm almost there - just need one more post
Guys, what is the purpose statement of XDA Developers? I am asking that because I figure that the purpose should be within the lines of providing end users most enjoyable smart phone, technology, gadget experience, keeping the users up-to-date about news and developments in the same arena, etc etc...
I am a Sony Xperia user and, sadly, due to the fact that we live in the United States, we are banned from using some of this end product. This product is Cyanogenmod, that is being developed by an "FXP" team that purposely chose a media sharing website that blocks IPs from the US. I did nothing to be a part of this political debacle but I can't enjoy Cyanogenmod anymore. We are also banned from mirroring this end product, is this something XDA or CM would approve?
Some of you might see me as moaning about the issue but I don't know where to go, how to ask for help because I should not be banned from using Cyanogenmod just because some development team has a political agenda. I would like to hear opinions and advice ...
As I recall, the ONLY rule of CyanogenMod is Don't ask for ETA's, not "don't ask for working download links", not "don't mirror files". We should not be forced to download through any other means than a working link. we should not have to download 3rd party software that we do not want in order to use the product.
What is the official tie between CM and FXP? Right now I am not able to use CM due to FXP, what does CM have to say about it? Do they know that FXP is banning the US users? (Technically, FXP is banning US users by uploading the product on a website that bans US IPs)
That may just be a team producing a version of the CM rom. Have you checked the CM site and see if a version of the rom is there?
If a dev requests that no mirrors should be posted, then they're within their rights to do so, as far as XDA is concerned.
As far as CM is concerned, I have no idea.
Bushmaster78FS said:
Right now I am not able to use CM due to FXP...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No-one's stopping you from getting ahold of the source code compiling it yourself.
But even if you did, the only reason CyanogenMod ROMs are a reality for the 2011 Xperia range is because of the work of the FreeXperia team, so you'd still owe them thanks.
zelendel said:
That may just be a team producing a version of the CM rom. Have you checked the CM site and see if a version of the rom is there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't yet, I browsed around CM forums for different things before, but I will register there and try to find out. From what I understand at the Xperia arc forums, FXP is the team that does serve Xperia series phones with CM work. There are of course different devs that use the CM or Sony ROMs as a base for their own work, but FXP is the one that ports the CM for Xperias, I could be wrong, I will find out.
the_scotsman said:
If a dev requests that no mirrors should be posted, then they're within their rights to do so, as far as XDA is concerned
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So technically it would be against XDA rules to post a mirror? I just don't want to cross the line with XDA, and frankly I don't give a hoot what FXP thinks. I have seen so many users just complaining and complaining about not being able to download. I can grab the ROMs whatnot from friends overseas, but I also want to help those who can't. So I would assume a private mirror should not be a violation of XDA rules.
Step666 said:
No-one's stopping you from getting ahold of the source code compiling it yourself.
But even if you did, the only reason CyanogenMod ROMs are a reality for the 2011 Xperia range is because of the work of the FreeXperia team, so you'd still owe them thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not trying to start a debate here or I am trying to be a smartass. I know very well that FXP's work is not the only one I can use with my phones. If I could compile a ROM myself, then I would not have started this thread, so your point is moot. I am just concerned about a ton of users being blocked from using Cyanogenmod, something that doesn't belong to FXP if I understood correctly, for what reason? And I am basically trying to find out how to get around this nonsensical limitation imposed on us without bugging XDA. Anyone would agree that a smart phone user would need XDA in general more than any specific dev team.
If a Dev says not to mirror their work and you do then you will be breaking XDA rules.
zelendel said:
If a Dev says not to mirror their work and you do then you will be breaking XDA rules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even if it is done privately?
Bushmaster78FS said:
I am not trying to start a debate here or I am trying to be a smartass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the future, it would be advisable to use more diplomatic language then.
Accusing FXP of stopping you from using CM when they're the only reason it exists doesn't give the best impression.
Bushmaster78FS said:
I am just concerned about a ton of users being blocked from using Cyanogenmod...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The fact that certain download sites are blocked by the US government is hardly the fault of FXP nor is it a matter that XDA have any control over.
If you want to complain to someone, contact your Senator or Congressperson.
Anyway, this entire thread is now moot as FXP have kindly taken the time to respond to this matter already:
FXP said:
you can always download cyanogen roms from cyanogen website
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Step666 said:
In the future, it would be advisable to use more diplomatic language then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is indeed what I was trying to convey knowing otherwise would earn me a ban, but my tone is out of frustration, I am not trying to offend anyone really.
The fact that certain download sites are blocked by the US government is hardly the fault of FXP nor is it a matter that XDA have any control over.
If you want to complain to someone, contact your Senator or Congressperson.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, but US didn't block the current upload website, they did block US in protest of MegaUpload (which is something I learned from the net of course) I have no interest in the politics of it, but I am suffering from it.
Anyway, this entire thread is now moot as FXP have kindly taken the time to respond to this matter already:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree and I got my answer.
Workaround:
Go to daveproxy.co.uk
Copy>Paste the CM URL
Go, and allow scripts cookies and stuff
download
???
profit
I tried that one and many other proxies as well. I can go all the way to the start link but then ul.to says all servers busy, register for premium... My friend overseas doesn't have this problem.
I jumped in when Shabby's host cut him off after cmupdater appears to have gone crazy and ate up a ton of bandwidth. But overall I was planning on being out of hosting for developers by the end of the year so its rather temporary. There were a couple other offers brought up at the time so those might still be on the table.
I offered to take the 10 bucks someone donated and chip in and get him a domain and 1 year of hosting over at that horrible company 1&1 but it was doing the job before and it will suffice again.
Phantom is busy working on something and isn't giving me any clues so I dunno what to do. Jan 1st I need to redirect cmupdater requests to another server, question is where. Projected usage this month is 3 TB, pretty low demand with an average of about 60 GB a day at the moment.
RainMotorsports said:
I jumped in when Shabby's host cut him off after cmupdater appears to have gone crazy and ate up a ton of bandwidth. But overall I was planning on being out of hosting for developers by the end of the year so its rather temporary. There were a couple other offers brought up at the time so those might still be on the table.
I offered to take the 10 bucks someone donated and chip in and get him a domain and 1 year of hosting over at that horrible company 1&1 but it was doing the job before and it will suffice again.
Phantom is busy working on something and isn't giving me any clues so I dunno what to do. Jan 1st I need to redirect cmupdater requests to another server, question is where. Projected usage this month is 3 TB, pretty low demand with an average of about 60 GB a day at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about AndroidFileHost? I'll also check with rwilco12 as I think he may have another suggestion.
garwynn said:
What about AndroidFileHost? I'll also check with rwilco12 as I think he may have another suggestion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well whatever is used needs to have ftp uploading and the abillity for a program to directly access a file with no website, waiting or anything inbetween as cmupdater reads directly from a file on the server. Now Chris said something about people using goo.im for cmupdater but unless someone wants to explain that I cant say hey go use this or that see ya. Needs to work out of the box with no fiddling for the most part.
I know he already has a goo... what about dev host?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Mattix724 said:
I know he already has a goo... what about dev host?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dev Host will have a limit of 20GB of file storage. AFH won't.
I'm checking on that now but may have to wait until I get home.
Mattix724 said:
I know he already has a goo... what about dev host?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once again with these hosts can you direct link to a file? cmupdater is going to point to whatever.whatever.com/whatever/api and if the file is not delivered right away then it will not work. Put it to you this way whatever I turn him over to has to work. 1/1/2013 I am going to redirect the links there and if it doesnt work, CM10 nightlies = bye bye until someone figures it out. Any real host works fine, anything that works like a file sharing site might not I cant just shove this into a corner and say sorry about your luck.
I contacted one guy who had a dedicated server as well before see what he says. Shabby is still combating high usage after the fact and well maybe I shouldnt have gotten back in only to have to say bye at the end of the year.
I'm sure folks appreciate you jumping in, if only for a temporary fix. This at least gives a little time to get it figured out.
RainMotorsports said:
Once again with these hosts can you direct link to a file? cmupdater is going to point to whatever.whatever.com/whatever/api and if the file is not delivered right away then it will not work. Put it to you this way whatever I turn him over to has to work. 1/1/2013 I am going to redirect the links there and if it doesnt work, CM10 nightlies = bye bye until someone figures it out. Any real host works fine, anything that works like a file sharing site might not I cant just shove this into a corner and say sorry about your luck.
I contacted one guy who had a dedicated server as well before see what he says. Shabby is still combating high usage after the fact and well maybe I shouldnt have gotten back in only to have to say bye at the end of the year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
rocket321 said:
I'm sure folks appreciate you jumping in, if only for a temporary fix. This at least gives a little time to get it figured out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Take it easy, Rain
rocket321 said:
I'm sure folks appreciate you jumping in, if only for a temporary fix. This at least gives a little time to get it figured out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was going to carry on a bit longer just for Phantom but the current and predicted load mean increased operating costs in the future and I just don't have it in me. So I had to make the decision to help him on to the next spot. I wish I could carry on.
Don't worry all current builds (11/26 and up) I can redirect to the new server so none of the builds that can see updates now will be left in the dark.
I have used Dreamhost in the past. No complaints for the price but we didn't have much traffic. Very easy to get up and running.
someguyatx said:
I have used Dreamhost in the past. No complaints for the price but we didn't have much traffic. Very easy to get up and running.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but unless someone has a dreamhost account to donate. Its a matter of there is no money coming out of his pocket. I don't want to start an account on something and have to deal with closing it out after a year to everyone's disappointment.
Sent inquiry to AFH admin... will let you guys know what the result is.
garwynn said:
Sent inquiry to AFH admin... will let you guys know what the result is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will be glad to try and set something up with you. Will email you shortly
Currently have 7 Servers in 5 States with a combined bandwidth of over 800TB of BW allocated each month Sure I can fit ya in somewhere
I sent you a PM RepinSpor. Assuming this will work for you as well I will pass along the small donation that was given to me by one of his supporters. Hopefully the hosting will draw you in a little more support as well.
I'm good irl friends with the devhost owners. I'll see what I can do...
RainMotorsports said:
I sent you a PM RepinSpor. Assuming this will work for you as well I will pass along the small donation that was given to me by one of his supporters. Hopefully the hosting will draw you in a little more support as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Recieved thanks. Sorry for the delays in responding. Work is a bit hectic today. I will gladly work with you and the others to insure you updater works on our servers and can shoot out the nightlies to everyone
In addition to AFH i also host nightlies and other sites for developers so this shouldn't be a problem
Alright thanks man and no rush. Have a couple weeks before the end of the year
Waiting for the sources that is, what are porters planning on sticking on this? Personally I want the sources to attempt to port Sailfish, only reason I bough the phone. I currently have the Nexus 5 and the OS runs buttery smooth thanks to the porters over at #sailfishos-porters
Am even wondering did I make a mistake buying this device when the Nexus 5, is more than enough omph to power the OS. But I've got it and gotta try, to atleast expand my own knowledge base.
also do you guys know how chainfire managed to build the kernel for it without the sources?
WTF?
The phone has been out for less than a month. Have some patience or start learning to develop yourself, rather than creating a useless thread, just to whine.
I got my 5x last Tuesday and forgot how little I like "pure" android. I think the usual progression is flash aosp then flash cyanogenmod once the nightlies start to stabilize. I know I'm in the minority but the nexus phones usually have too much Google on them for my taste. I like the hardware, but the software is another story.
At any rate, I'm also waiting for the binaries and device tree so that I can start building my own.
m4r0v3r said:
Waiting for the sources that is, what are porters planning on sticking on this? Personally I want the sources to attempt to port Sailfish, only reason I bough the phone. I currently have the Nexus 5 and the OS runs buttery smooth thanks to the porters over at #sailfishos-porters
Am even wondering did I make a mistake buying this device when the Nexus 5, is more than enough omph to power the OS. But I've got it and gotta try, to atleast expand my own knowledge base.
also do you guys know how chainfire managed to build the kernel for it without the sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you knew much about how android works, you'd know that chainfire didn't make a kernel. He took the boot image and modified some fstab, prop, and sepolicy stuff, repackaged it, and released it. He didn't build his own kernel.
In any case, I'm curious about this, how long does it usually take google to release their sources?
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
sn0warmy said:
WTF?
The phone has been out for less than a month. Have some patience or start learning to develop yourself, rather than creating a useless thread, just to whine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh yeah Ill just go and create a kernel, and while am at it, I may as well write my own drivers. Maybe I'll call my kernel linox, and adopt this policy of sharing my source code so other people could collaborate. Maybe using some sort of version control, call Hit or something, maybe on some website called HitHub.
Yeah that sounds like a good way to develop it...Or Google could hurry the **** up and release the sources and binaries so I wouldn't have to.
Well if you read my post you'd see I was curious about what people wanted to port.
drsn0w said:
If you knew much about how android works, you'd know that chainfire didn't make a kernel. He took the boot image and modified some fstab, prop, and sepolicy stuff, repackaged it, and released it. He didn't build his own kernel.
In any case, I'm curious about this, how long does it usually take google to release their sources?
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not make but people have been saying it was built with forceencrypt disabled so I thought he built the kernel with that flag, (ie he had the sources). But it seems thats not the place to change it
Wow the self-entitlement is real nowadays, patience bro. You cant have everything instantly when you want it.
m4r0v3r said:
oh yeah Ill just go and create a kernel, and while am at it, I may as well write my own drivers. Maybe I'll call my kernel linox, and adopt this policy of sharing my source code so other people could collaborate. Maybe using some sort of version control, call Hit or something, maybe on some website called HitHub.
Yeah that sounds like a good way to develop it...Or Google could hurry the **** up and release the sources and binaries so I wouldn't have to.
Well if you read my post you'd see I was curious about what people wanted to port.
Not make but people have been saying it was built with forceencrypt disabled so I thought he built the kernel with that flag, (ie he had the sources). But it seems thats not the place to change it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
timjp692 said:
Wow the self-entitlement is real nowadays, patience bro. You cant have everything instantly when you want it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what to expect an open source based phone to have the sources with it?
No I know I can't have everything when I instantly want it, but really what could be the reason for the delay. Since am already pretty pissed about the force encryption.
m4r0v3r said:
what to expect an open source based phone to have the sources with it?
No I know I can't have everything when I instantly want it, but really what could be the reason for the delay. Since am already pretty pissed about the force encryption.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, but you sound like a whiney little 12 year old who is used to having everything they want RIGHT when they want it. Kind of sums up the turn this forum has taken over the past couple of years.
In the real world you'll learn that good things take time. The phrase, "patience is a virtue" holds true merit.
Offer a bounty if you're that impatient.
sn0warmy said:
I'm sorry, but you sound like a whiney little 12 year old who is used to having everything they want RIGHT when they want it. Kind of sums up the turn this forum has taken over the past couple of years.
In the real world you'll learn that good things take time. The phrase, "patience is a virtue" holds true merit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apology accepted.
bblzd said:
Offer a bounty if you're that impatient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For what exactly? Someone to break in Google servers and take the source code? lol
m4r0v3r said:
For what exactly? Someone to break in Google servers and take the source code? lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm waiting too- it's not like google is still working on the binary drivers and just building the production rom with hacked up device trees until they get the real ones. I could be mis-remembering, but in the past, I thought the factory roms and binary drivers were available the day the devices were released.
I can certainly understand being patient with devs who are working on roms (for free/beer/donations), but google is done with the rom and has already released it to production. The factory image for the 6p was delayed as well. It's not a secret- they are going to push it to every one who bought a phone. My conspiracy theory is that google is trying to bury aosp, and merging android and chrome will be another stab into the heart of both privacy and freedom.
and its outtt
m4r0v3r said:
and its outtt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Waiting for some real nexus thing then