http://techc0re.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-exynos-4-quad-processor/
Hopefully this supports LTE and makes it into the Sprint version!
That sounds FREAKIN' sweet!!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
I love how it said it is great at handling intensive applications like 3D games and video editing. How many consumers will be editing any type of video on their phones? I'm all for faster phones as much as the next guy, but is it really necessary? Although I think it would be sweet to have some apps to control video editing software on my computer. Just my 2ยข
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA Premium App
Quad core a9 with an overclocked Mali 400 is all pretty old tech by now. I'll be waiting for the Nexus with Jelly Bean around Christmas, hopefully it'll be a15 powered.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Doubt it
The nexus series has mostly been dated or weaker hardware
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
gtuansdiamm said:
Doubt it
The nexus series has mostly been dated or weaker hardware
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking the same thing which is why this announcement is a letdown to me.. the SIII isn't much of an upgrade and the Nexus probably won't be either unless they make the switch to A15
Pheno.menon said:
Quad core a9 with an overclocked Mali 400 is all pretty old tech by now. I'll be waiting for the Nexus with Jelly Bean around Christmas, hopefully it'll be a15 powered.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is that old technology. I would say its cutting edge. There is only one phone out that uses a quad core and its a Tegra 3 not a Exynos. Exynos is supposed to be way more powerful. Also since Nvidia and qualcomm had a falling out ( from my understanding ) its not even available in the US. Quad core with 20% lower power consumption, bigger HD screen and 12 mp camera alone makes me want it bad.
Im super excited for this! I dont think the next nexus will be all that to be honest. The Nexus has never really stood for groundbreaking technology and if Sammy makes it your probably looking at the chip that will be in it lol. The benchmarks on the S3 look amazing thoughleaps and bounds better than anything out their currently. And we still dont know the GPU yet. I think so far its pretty much demolished my chance at getting the evo 4g lte. Unless they do something crazy like throw an S4 in the Sprint version.
Sent from my E4GT using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
dhoshman said:
Im super excited for this! I dont think the next nexus will be all that to be honest. The Nexus has never really stood for groundbreaking technology and if Sammy makes it your probably looking at the chip that will be in it lol. The benchmarks on the S3 look amazing thoughleaps and bounds better than anything out their currently. And we still dont know the GPU yet. I think so far its pretty much demolished my chance at getting the evo 4g lte. Unless they do something crazy like throw an S4 in the Sprint version.
Sent from my E4GT using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could be totally wrong but I would think that the Evo 4g late would have the S4. I don't know much about the s4 but it must be pretty good because your like the 6th person I've seen praising it.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I really dont get why people are complaining. I cant wait!!!
All I can say is that they better drop something soon to pre grab those otherwise Christmas waiters... Or else people will flock to the phones that use the Intel chips.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Still waiting to see the GPU...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
dw3bb10 said:
I really dont get why people are complaining. I cant wait!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because an A9 chip doesn't mean crap, it's old tech. And the Mali400 was already old with the S2 came out, why the heck are they using it again. It's not going to perform much differently than this phone aside from some big HD games, the only difference youre looking at is probably some sharper pictures and a nicer screen.
Well, it comes down to this....
Samsung quad core(older technology doubled)(like a nice 1988 Iroc Z28)
HTC dual core(new tech)(like a finely tuned Audi A3 turbo)
Motorola Tegra 3(a new Mustang....not a cobra)
Where is the Ferrari?(Quad Core Krait)
I am on the fence. I bet HTC drains slower. Motorola might have one huge battery(3300). Samsung has a better screen and pictures.
What are you guys thinking?
kc_exactly said:
Well, it comes down to this....
Samsung quad core(older technology doubled)(like a nice 1988 Iroc Z28)
HTC dual core(new tech)(like a finely tuned Audi A3 turbo)
Motorola Tegra 3(a new Mustang....not a cobra)
Where is the Ferrari?(Quad Core Krait)
I am on the fence. I bet HTC drains slower. Motorola might have one huge battery(3300). Samsung has a better screen and pictures.
What are you guys thinking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am thinking I am stuck at the exact same place you are right now! Lol. In the past, one device always stuck out and I knew I would get it way ahead of time. I am undecided right now
Sent from either ET4G or NS4G using Xparent Tapatalk 2
Okay, which is it???? Quad or Dual Core?
Galaxy S3 Dual Core:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-s3-dual-core-snapdragon-s4-us-79146/
Or Quad Core:
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-s3-processor-exynos-4-quad-core-79262/
http://www.techradar.com/news/phone...als-the-galaxy-s3-quad-core-processor-1077741
Further reading has confirmed my speculations. Sounds like we won't get the quad core in the USA. We will be getting a qualcomm chip. Maybe the same chip in the HTC EVO LTE.
Same here. There was always one phone I really wanted... like the E4GT. But since I don't upgrade for months, I'll stick it out for the next Nexus device, at least to see what it is or isn't
How long before this entry:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/26/orange-santa-clara-intel-medfield/
starts accelerating in advancements that others have a hard time comparing to?
kc_exactly said:
Okay, which is it???? Quad or Dual Core?
Galaxy S3 Dual Core:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/antutu-purportedly-reveals-galaxy-s-iii-specs/
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-s3-dual-core-snapdragon-s4-us-79146/
Or Quad Core:
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-s3-processor-exynos-4-quad-core-79262/
http://www.techradar.com/news/phone...als-the-galaxy-s3-quad-core-processor-1077741
Further reading has confirmed my speculations. Sounds like we won't get the quad core in the USA. We will be getting a qualcomm chip. Maybe the same chip in the HTC EVO LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to Android Central, we'll be getting the dual core S4 A-15 chip because of LTE.
Sent while hanging with that really hoopy frood Ford Prefect.
blackroseMD1 said:
According to Android Central, we'll be getting the dual core S4 A-15 chip because of LTE.
Sent while hanging with that really hoopy frood Ford Prefect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is the s4 faster than the exynos? I was really hoping for exynos with lte . I know i read somewhere they had exynos with lte..
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA Premium App
Related
http://m.engadget.com/default/artic...xus-sprint-rumor/&category=classic&postPage=1
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
So what? It was pretty much a sure thing eventually. I still think that the E4GT is the better phone. It will get ICS this year, by samsung or the wonderful devs here. It has a better processor that clocks higher with a better GPU. The camera is 8mp vice 5mp and while megapixels arent everything, there is a clear quality difference between the ones I take and the ones my friends Nexus on verizons take.
Yes yes..its a nexus..gets OTA via google. But guess what..even the 'stock' android of a nexus device ends up being heavily modified by users here at xda anyway. So might as well tweak and tinker on a better hardware phone. They might get updates a little faster..but we get those updates soon enought..they DONT get our hardware eventually. lol
1.5GHz dual-core processor. For those keeping count, that's 300MHz more powerful than the 1.2GHz chip in the HSPA+ and VZW models.
^ That seems pretty good to me
"1.5GHz dual-core processor. For those keeping count, that's 300MHz more powerful than the 1.2GHz chip in the HSPA+ and VZW models"
Edit - beat me to it.
This is the first Lte phone on sprint and that's a big deal
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
digweed4me said:
http://m.engadget.com/default/artic...xus-sprint-rumor/&category=classic&postPage=1
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when will it be available ...i don't care about camera i want fully working updates in the same year as its released...
I'm keeping my SGS2E4GT until LTE is available in the locations that I work.
Right now I use Wimax in both Denver and St Louis and tether my Laptop, Nook Color, and other devices.
Not switching to an LTE phone until LTE is available in both those places. I don't think I'll be getting the GNex either. By the time Sprint rolls out LTE the Nexus 4 will be out.
Is it time omap or exynos processor?
If it exynos then will buy it in heartbeat
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Cant see myself getting excited over a phone that probably won't even come out until June or July and will already be leapfrogged by other phones. I swear I hate the US methods of releasing phones.
First Lte will be in Dallas, Atlanta Houston, and some other cities by mid 2012 so leaking lte galaxy nexus makes sense
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
digweed4me said:
Is it time omap or exynos processor?
If it exynos then will buy it in heartbeat
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great, if it's better than this phone, I'll be super pissed.
Its AOSP, thats all that needs to be said. I will be on it launch day (hopefully). I am right outside of Houston, though the LTE won't make it to me, Wimax hasn't either
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
digweed4me said:
Is it time omap or exynos processor?
If it exynos then will buy it in heartbeat
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bet is is a TI OMAP. Would make updating easier to keep same chip family as other GNex.
I was expecting the GNex to be released soon on Sprint. That's why I bought a used SGS2E4GT for $250 and still have my upgrade ready to go. I will probably wait until LTE is available near me, however.
I hope this is the Exynos that we originally heard about...even if it isn't, pffft, big deal. I'm already making plans to sell my ET4G if this thing drops any later than March 26th....which would be stupid, but, whatever.
N1 was awesome, NS/4G was awesome...I haven't played with one yet, but, even if it is the OMAP it will be clocked to 1.5ghz and but much closer in performance to our 1.2ghz Exynos......and if its Exynos, holy crap.
...maybe they just needed some time to finish developing the CDMA+LTE Exynos and after all the delays they did what it took to get the first one out the door last year at all....
This news is very meh to me. I had the Galaxy Nexus and returned it after a few weeks. It's a cool phone but the E4GT is much nicer.
I will be selling my Epic Touch, any buyers?
My thoughts exactly
digweed4me said:
Is it time omap or exynos processor?
If it exynos then will buy it in heartbeat
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
brownhornet said:
Cant see myself getting excited over a phone that probably won't even come out until June or July and will already be leapfrogged by other phones. I swear I hate the US methods of releasing phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1,
i agree, by then maybe we'll have a SG3, htc or just around the corner another great phone ...
That actually looks nice. Might be my next phone. We'll see what's out by June.
No point in getting a new phone until we have LTE and sadly Kansas City wasn't on that list. I bet we get it soon though. Somethig about us being the Sprint world headquarters...
Are they just overclocking the Sprint version? http://www.technobuffalo.com/tag/galaxy-nexus/
i really hope they get a qualcomm version and just took a higher advertised clock speed over real life performance, i will never be using a snapdragon processor again, at least if their still using adreno
Its an ad, and its probably wrong.
Guess well find out soon enough. I won't be going back to Sprint till LTE is in my area.
I agree, I think its the ad that's wrong
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
its all marketing to get customers back on thier junk network!
cordell507 said:
i really hope they get a qualcomm version and just took a higher advertised clock speed over real life performance, i will never be using a snapdragon processor again, at least if their still using adreno
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you have against adreno?
My grandma beat me down and took my nexus. Sent from a jitterbug with beats by dre.
I don't think their LTE is launching until Q2 and by that time it'd be rather foolish it buy it considering the SGS3 should be out by then and a new Nexus would probably be less than 6 months away.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I wonder what they would call it ... Lol
Samsung Galaxy Nexus Epic Touch 4G LTE
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Our CPU is rated for 1.5 but Google decided to UV the clock for battery life. Different carriers pay for different options so its not surprising that sprint would try and be different. They have to because there network is like a big long turd that wraps around the toilet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Does anyone have a guess on why they went with Texas instruments processor over samsungs exynos processor? Thanks in advance
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
They used OMAP4460 in the VZW version as Exynos doesn't like LTE at all. That's why the US version of the SGS2 is Snapdragon instead of Exynos. As for the GSM version, I'm guessing because they couldn't be bothered using anything better.
Thanks bud! So our verizon version has a different and better chip set?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
kirdroid said:
I wonder what they would call it ... Lol
Samsung Galaxy Nexus Epic Touch 4G LTE
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Samsung Galaxy Nexus touch 4G LTE epic fail.
My grandma beat me down and took my nexus. Sent from a jitterbug with beats by dre.
mike216 said:
Thanks bud! So our verizon version has a different and better chip set?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No? They all have the same chipset.
cordell507 said:
i really hope they get a qualcomm version and just took a higher advertised clock speed over real life performance, i will never be using a snapdragon processor again, at least if their still using adreno
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats wrong with Adreno, you do know that adreno 220 is faster than gpu used in GN right?
mike216 said:
Does anyone have a guess on why they went with Texas instruments processor over samsungs exynos processor? Thanks in advance
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Being a Nexus device, Google likes spreading the love. Nexus One had Snapdragon, Nexus S had Hummingbird, Xoom (not Nexus, but closely supported by Google) had Tegra, GNex has TI. Next up, who knows... But they certainly seem to like broadening the amount of chipsets they support more than they're focusing on raw performance.
Here sprint has some serious data issues. So bad tha AT&T is faster on edge much of the time. They could release a 2ghz version and i still wouldn't go back to them. I'm sure that it is likely worse now with the iphone.
mike216 said:
Our CPU is rated for 1.5 but Google decided to UV the clock for battery life. Different carriers pay for different options so its not surprising that sprint would try and be different. They have to because there network is like a big long turd that wraps around the toilet
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to set your story straight....
The SoC is rated for UP to 1.5 GHz. This doesn't mean that our chips are in fact rated for operation at 1.5 GHz. Take some time and search the dev threads about this. It's a pretty big misconception regarding the 4460. Not all 4460's are in fact the same (apparently). Did Samsung/Google underclock these chips? Slightly, but as you will see, these chips will not in fact (generally) hit clockrates higher than 1.4 GHz. The general thought is that there is an issue with the clock generator for 1.5 GHz and higher, which causes the problem.
The GN for Sprint will have the same problems, and will probably be a PR nightmare now.....especially when users find out that their GN only runs at 1.2 GHz.
Sprint version probably has different SoC.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
http://nvonews.com/2012/01/11/samsung-galaxy-s3-rumors-it-may-come-with-12-mp-camera/
probably a repost but the specs on this phone are amazing!
somewhat a repost, I posted the latest rumors about the S3 on Android Authority not to long ago:
http://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-galaxy-s3-specs-40180/
Rumors lol. Remember the g. nexus rumors? Pretty far fetched from what the actual thing was.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
bbedward said:
Rumors lol. Remember the g. nexus rumors? Pretty far fetched from what the actual thing was.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah the entire name was wrong. Remember the Samsung Nexus Prime? I actually liked the name better.
bbedward said:
Rumors lol. Remember the g. nexus rumors? Pretty far fetched from what the actual thing was.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About the only thing i saw skimming that wouldn't make it for sure is the screen.
Doubling the ram isnt crazy at all. 12MP while not even desirable due to image noise is pretty low considering the HTC Titan II and others are sporting 16MP sensors. 2 Ghz A9 dual core is available pushing it a little but hey.
12 megapixels actually can be pretty good. It isnt all about megapixels. My wife has a 500 dollar Canon that is only 14. I am pretty sure our 8 megapixel is better than a lot of phones.
On my Epic mobile phone.
I think that is the Sprint LTE phone to get. My SGS2E4GT will last me until there is LTE in my area. By then the GNex will be old news. SGS3 will be my upgrade.
I hated 3D. I got an EVO 3D before and is not good watching a full movie. It hurts your eye. Why not change the screen size to match the galaxy note.
Rumors or not that image is awesome..
Go a little stronger on the radios this time Samsung... kthx.
Reality S3 probably:
1.5 Quadcore - 12MP Camera - 16/32GB - 2GB Ram
Wishful S3:
2.5GB Quadcore - 16MP camera - 32/64GB - 2/3GB Ram
What will make me say WOW is if I could replace my laptop and be able to handle medium to light heavy processing power of a laptop (probably s4)... Until then it's business as usual.
If that's true, I'm starting to save right now.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Those specs are nice, but they better make sure the radios they user are to of the line with no GPS issues or loss of signal problems and slow 3g.
Swyped from my Samsung Galaxy SII EPIC 4g Touch on XDA Premium!
We have to remember we're dealing with a phone manufacturer AND processor maker here. It all depends on which route Samsung decides to go with their processors...the Nvidia route, and racing to add more cores; or the qualcomm route, and trying to improve and refine their dual cores. Both ways offer benefits.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Alex1x said:
Reality S3 probably:
1.5 Quadcore - 12MP Camera - 16/32GB - 2GB Ram
Wishful S3:
2.5GB Quadcore - 16MP camera - 32/64GB - 2/3GB Ram
What will make me say WOW is if I could replace my laptop and be able to handle medium to light heavy processing power of a laptop (probably s4)... Until then it's business as usual.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd like to add a 2,000mAh+ battery to those specs. Can never have a big enough battery right?
I'm getting it.I came from HTC,had evo 4g,evo3d,I thought I loved those phones but now I fell for E4gT and will get 3 too
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Definitely my next upgrade.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
I will see what Sammy has in store for us tomorrow ....Vegas is getting close now!
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't quad core. Quad core is sorta overkill and it might be a battery hog. I am thinking something bigger than 1.5 dual core is in order though.
On my Epic mobile phone.
EvoSideHustlAZ said:
I'm getting it.I came from HTC,had evo 4g,evo3d,I thought I loved those phones but now I fell for E4gT and will get 3 too
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried to convince the HTC fanboys exactly this but they don't want to hear it. All they have to say it, Samsung phones are plastic and junk.....Um okay, I will enjoy my junk phone that destroys the EVO 3D in every way but you keep thinking your phone is better.
I am so glad I gave this phone a chance because it made me realize how crappy and underachievers HTC phones really are.
Whatever the SGS3 will have it will have to be an upgrade from the SGS2 and because of that, I will be on it!
I knew it, im pretty sure this is real, the next S4 will be the most powerful device...Samsung Exynos 5450 @ 2.0 GHz Quad Core.
http://www.androidauthority.com/sam...-5-inch-display-exynos-5450-processor-126575/
Unless they pack that 5" screen into the same size case, I'll pass.. Love the S3, but don't want a bigger case
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
4.8" vs 5.0" can u notice the difference? i dont think the phone dimension is gonna change just the 0.2" on the screen...
yoniinfante said:
4.8" vs 5.0" can u notice the difference? i dont think the phone dimension is gonna change just the 0.2" on the screen...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well Apple called .5 an amazing revolution, I'm sure samsung can get away with calling .2 a big leap haha
This could be true but based upon all the "leaked" specs that came out right up until the release of the S3, this may all be speculation.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Good lord! That would be awesome. Specs would be second to none.
And also the better build quality thing. Although the SIII gave Apple a run for its money, a better aesthetics quality build could finally put Apple to sleep (not saying that's Samsung's objective, other creating quality devices.) But I still know a few Apple fanboy stragglers who still won't switch because of the plastic quality of the S3. Maybe this will be the straw that breaks the camels back.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Better build quality for LG = subpar build quality for even HTC. Sorry, but LG makes ****ty phones. Horrible battery life especially. I'll stick to Sammy, thanks!
Can't wait I will be getting foe sure
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
Isn't it s4 going to have a dual core cortexa15 exynos like the nexus 10
That's what i thought
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Only if the s4 supports lte 800/1900/2500/2600 will I buy it. The s3 performance-wise is fast enough. The network...not so fast.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
I don't want nothing with a exynos processor. look at the trouble the devs are having with the international s3
nicholaaaas said:
I don't want nothing with a exynos processor. look at the trouble the devs are having with the international s3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In all fairness, Samsung's responded and has been pushing source code out for Exynos CPUs. It does make future purchasers skeptical, though.
gtuansdiamm said:
Isn't it s4 going to have a dual core cortexa15 exynos like the nexus 10
That's what i thought
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it. Google puts strong price constraints in nexus devices lately. And Samsung isn't gonna develop to there own just to keep a flag ship CPU out of a flag ship phone...... our phone strongly resembles a15 architecture basically it is
Bet on the most practical. Highest end compromise definitely quad core
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
i wouldn't want a bigger screen
yoniinfante said:
I knew it, im pretty sure this is real, the next S4 will be the most powerful device...Samsung Exynos 5450 @ 2.0 GHz Quad Core.
http://www.androidauthority.com/sam...-5-inch-display-exynos-5450-processor-126575/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was s3 snappier than s2? No, even though it's almost twice faster in quadrant.
Samsung is gonna mess it up again, no doubt.
Only hope is for aosp roms.
nabbed said:
Was s3 snappier than s2? No, even though it's almost twice faster in quadrant.
Samsung is gonna mess it up again, no doubt.
Only hope is for aosp roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you stupid? the s3 is hella snappier than the s2 in every regard. have you even played with an s2?
Wait its not going to be quad core? I highly doubt that is true it would be a big fail on Samsung if they only had a dual IMO quad is becoming set standard with 2 gigs ram
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
the thing is with the build quality of samsung and apple from what i noticed is that the plasticy feel oh the phone actually makes it more durable against hard falls compared to apples iphone with its strong firm build of the device makes it more vulnerable when it comes to hard falls because the phone is actually pressurized to the point where one little fall can cause major damage to the iphone. so from that ill take a plastic feel of a phone against iphone build quality
nabbed said:
Was s3 snappier than s2? No, even though it's almost twice faster in quadrant.
Samsung is gonna mess it up again, no doubt.
Only hope is for aosp roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not only was it faster, it's way faster. Even faster than aosp, so your argument holds no grounds.
Sent front my Samsung Galaxy SIII Epic 4GLTE Touch
hayabusa1300cc said:
Not only was it faster, it's way faster. Even faster than aosp, so your argument holds no grounds.
Sent front my Samsung Galaxy SIII Epic 4GLTE Touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great rebuttal not only faster but WAY faster.
I'm still holding onto my beloved S2, s3 wasnt much of an improvement for me. Plus gorilla glass2 sucks in my eyes.
Each to his/her opinion.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Ok, I have been given a sgh-i957 Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE on AT&T for work and it's Nvidia Tegra 2 or Qualcomm Snapdragon Dual-core at 1.5 GHz with Honeycomb and TouchWiz is ungodly laggy and slow. First off, I know I am comparing a tablet to a phone but I am curious how the S4gT with current release and its 1.2 GHz Samsung Exynos C210 dual-core compares. I am very worried it is just the in-efficiency of Android and I am wondering if I should wait for a quad core phone like the LG Optimus G. Or if the versions of the Operating Systems are to blame. I know most of us here have customized one way or another but I am hoping someone can remember how it was before they made their device awesome. The Wimax vs. LTE issue doesn't bother me because even though Sprint swears they have LTE here in Houston a lot of people are reporting their LTE phone's are on 3g more. This will help me determine if I sign a contract today for a new phone or wait until the LG Optimus G comes out. On a side note I can do nothing custom to the work supplied tablet, LOL.
The Exynos SoC in the S2's is very fast and the Mali graphics are generally equal to that in the USA S3's. This phone shows little to no lag in any situation that I've found.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
This phone destroys the competition... until recently.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Mattix724 said:
This phone destroys the competition... until recently.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, how?
This phone is just super fast, smooth, and out performs almost every other phone on the market.
The Exynos chip is just awesome.
Only the newest phones can out perform this phone. In my opinion this is better than the Galaxy Tab, better then every other S2 variant, better than the iPhone 4S...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
I myself haven't experienced the ungodly lag you speak of sir, and I usually go back to stock every once in a while. You could wait, LG has made some awesome improvements to their devices to actually call them smartphones. I lover this phone but I am going nexus myself but that's just me
Mattix724 said:
This phone is just super fast, smooth, and out performs almost every other phone on the market.
The Exynos chip is just awesome.
Only the newest phones can out perform this phone. In my opinion this is better than the Galaxy Tab, better then every other S2 variant, better than the iPhone 4S...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OG i9100 and the i777 might have a word with you as they also have the same chip set as us but also includes NFC. But typically it's pretty much acknowledged that the GS2 roflstomped all the competition last year upon its release in terms of raw power. Other manufacturers came close to it though with 720p displays and sped up S3 soc's.
The reign of the GS2 only truly ended upon the release of the HTC 1x with it's S4 / Tegra 3 which was last april. So in essence. The S2 ruled the landscape for almost a year and was in a completely different class of performance. The Tegra 2 / S3 were far behind the 4210.
asd87 said:
I myself haven't experienced the ungodly lag you speak of sir, and I usually go back to stock every once in a while. You could wait, LG has made some awesome improvements to their devices to actually call them smartphones. I lover this phone but I am going nexus myself but that's just me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The lag is on my tablet, I am asking if the phone has the same problem, Sorry if there was any confusion.
Yeah I guess the I777 and I9100 both have the Exynos chip also...
I'll change what I said to include those devices.
Any Galaxy S II that comes with the Exynos CPU is a beast and there was no competition until the international S3 and the OX was released.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Thanks guys, you have been really helpful.
How would you compare the Galaxy Nexus to the Epic 4g Touch performance wise? It looks like the price for the upgrade is 49.96 not .96 cents and I can get the Galaxy Nexus for the same price so I was just curious.
I would say the Epic 4G Touch is better specs wise, but the Galaxy Nexus is better software wise.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
How would you compare the camera on the E4gT and the SGS3?
I never used the camera on the S3 but they are both 8MP. So I imagine the quality is the same.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
jonny4 said:
How would you compare the camera on the E4gT and the SGS3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sgs3 has better low light performance, less shutter lag, and it works overall a lot better. Not to say the s2 has a bad camera, it's amazing. Just not quite where the s3 is. You were asking about the gnex versus the s2? Obviously a
being a nexus the gnex gets better software updates, but speed wise it's a joke. Worse processor. Worse gpu, terrible camera, terrible battery life, pentile screen, etc etc. However if I had a choice I would STILL go with the gnex because I really do value software that much
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
jonny4 said:
Ok, I have been given a sgh-i957 Galaxy Tab 8.9 LTE on AT&T for work and it's Nvidia Tegra 2 or Qualcomm Snapdragon Dual-core at 1.5 GHz with Honeycomb and TouchWiz is ungodly laggy and slow. First off, I know I am comparing a tablet to a phone but I am curious how the S4gT with current release and its 1.2 GHz Samsung Exynos C210 dual-core compares. I am very worried it is just the in-efficiency of Android and I am wondering if I should wait for a quad core phone like the LG Optimus G. Or if the versions of the Operating Systems are to blame. I know most of us here have customized one way or another but I am hoping someone can remember how it was before they made their device awesome. The Wimax vs. LTE issue doesn't bother me because even though Sprint swears they have LTE here in Houston a lot of people are reporting their LTE phone's are on 3g more. This will help me determine if I sign a contract today for a new phone or wait until the LG Optimus G comes out. On a side note I can do nothing custom to the work supplied tablet, LOL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The E4GT is very smooth and not laggy, unlike the Galaxy 8.9 Tab. I used that Tablet several times when working on it for my friend and its lagginess and slow responses were really irritating.