[DEV][KERNEL] Update (21/08/2013) for GB users

[DEV][KERNEL] Update (21/08/2013) for GB users - Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660

hi all ...
I wanna share my kernel for GB users
What New ?
Kernel Version 2.6.35.14
Some Backport Future from Erikcas kernel 2.6.39.x
Update GPU
Add More CpuFreq
Add some Governor and I/O , SmartassH3, sioplus,Zen,etc
Zen set as Default Scaling Gov and I/O Sched
Inject Tweak on Ramdisk
More Powerfull and Smooth
Enable SWAP
Enable Deep Sleep
Save your battery
EXT4 File System
BLN Support
Custom Splash Screen and Change Android Text *this kernel i'm use on my ROM :silly:
and See By Your Self :silly:
available governor :
POWERSAVE
USERSPACE
ONDEMAND
CONSERVATIVE
INTERACTIVE
SMARTASS
SMARTASS2
INTERACTIVEX
SCARY
SAVAGEDZEN
LAGFREE
MINMAX
BRAZILIANWAX
ONDEMANDX
SUPERBAD
LILGSMART
LAZY
==================================
add :
LIONHEART
LULZACTIVE
MSM7K
SMARTASS1
VIRTUOUS
SMOOTHASS
How to :
Use CWM with support ext4
go to recovery mode
mount system
install zip on sdcard
reboot
DWYOR
This benchmark using antutu without OC
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Download Here
Thank's to :
squadzone
tj_style
Erikcas
BNCrew
Galaxy Gio Community
RECOMENDED FOR ROM WITHOUT TWEAK ON INIT.D IF YOU GET LAG PLEASE REMOVE TWEAK ON YOUR /SYSTEM/ETC/INIT.D
THANKS
PM ME IF YOU WANT USING MY KERNEL ON YOUR CUSTOM ROM
Thanks

To comply with the GPLv2 you will need to link to your kernel source.

what is new in this kernel ???

andyharney said:
To comply with the GPLv2 you will need to link to your kernel source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry i dont have connection tu upload my source ..

Msulviu said:
what is new in this kernel ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can see on add governor

Hmm, if u dont upload source mods can close this thread, gpl violation is treated as warez
A little introduction
Recently in several Android fora on XDA-Developers, it has come to the attention of the moderator team that there have been issues regarding developers’ compliance with the GPL. This post aims to clarify the position of XDA on the use of GPL sources, particularly in the development of Android kernels.
Without the GPL, the Android operating system would likely never have come about. Through the work of Linus Torvalds, the Linux kernel was made open source for all to use, share and modify. As Android runs on the Linux kernel, and features numerous modifications to these sources, it would not exist in its present state without the Open Source community.
As a result, it is in the interests of everyone who owns an Android phone, who wishes to see further development on the platform, to ensure that they play their part in upholding both the letter and spirit of the GPL.
The GNU General Public Licence (also known as the GPL) is available to read in full at www.gnu.org
To make it easy for everyone to spot a release that complies with the GPL mark the title of your release thread with [GPL]. If you find a ROM which does not comply with the GPL, or the developer does not issue sources, you can report the post as usual, using the report post button next to the post number. Alternatively you may PM your forum specific moderator.
The Rules as they apply on XDA
As XDA has no legal power to uphold the GPL (and frankly we want to stay as far away from doing so as possible), we can’t force any of our users to abide by the GPL. However it is in XDA’s interests as well as the interests of our developer-base to ensure all GPL-derived materials hosted or linked on XDA comply fully with the GPL.
[*]GPL-derived materials that do not come with the complete sources used to compile the GPL components are considered warez, and will be treated as such under forum rule 6 and 9.
[*]If you use GPL components, but do not make any modifications to them whatsoever, you should provide a link to the original source of your GPL code.
[*]Sources accompanying a release should be complete, and contain all the necessary source code for any modules, scripts or definition files. Complete sources will be defined as those which compile correctly and completely against the platform for which the software is distributed, and which contain any and all modifications made to the released General Public Licenced code. The source code supplied should be the exact version for which the source code is being requested, complete with all modifications.
EXAMPLE: Here’s a bit of code that could be used as a template to post your releases
The Very Quick Summary of General Public License (GPL)
The text of the GPL Licence itself will be used to reach any final conclusion regarding any disputes over GPL Licenced materials. The above is a summary of what XDA expects of members using GPL code, and the complete text can be read at the GNU website.
The GPL states that anyone who modifies GPL licenced code is required to make available the sources used to compile it. This is to further improve and encourage collaborative work, as well as to ensure that the best code possible is produced, and to encourage peer-review of all work. This benefits both developers and end users in numerous ways, including:
[*]Allowing anyone to verify the code they are trusting with their data, and its authenticity
[*]Encouraging community collaboration to produce faster fixes and updates, and better code
[*]Helping bring new developments from other devices and fields to your own, letting you benefit from new code that wouldn’t have been available without this sharing.
[*]The GPL imparts great freedom for GPL end users. It ensures innovation is never stifled and no project is dependent upon any single developer.
It is in everyone’s interest for the GPL to be adhered to, as it gives us all better ROMs, better transparency, and a better atmosphere for developers to work together to make great code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA

lemmymet said:
Hmm, if u dont upload source mods can close this thread, gpl violation is treated as warez
Sent from my GT-S5660 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry , i try to upload my source but my connection don't stabil to upload it ..
if i have stabil connection i will give my link

I used Phiexz CM7. Performance is good but very bad battery usage. Kernel on the battery is very good if you try.

Ok! I've intall this! So what is the best option for a long baterry life?

If you cannot provide source I will have to close your thread.
I'll give you a few more days to get it sorted

Mavi Tuna said:
I used Phiexz CM7. Performance is good but very bad battery usage. Kernel on the battery is very good if you try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you have calibrate your battery after flash cm7 ..?

kompressorgpl said:
Ok! I've intall this! So what is the best option for a long baterry life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try to use smartassv2 or smoothass ..
but calibrate your battery before

andyharney said:
If you cannot provide source I will have to close your thread.
I'll give you a few more days to get it sorted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okay, if i have connection i will upload my source

kompressorgpl said:
Ok! I've intall this! So what is the best option for a long baterry life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would vote for "conservative", with the following advanced settings:
sampling rate 200000us (fastest)
up threshold 40%
down threshold 30%
freq step 10%

andyharney said:
If you cannot provide source I will have to close your thread.
I'll give you a few more days to get it sorted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he use my source, and only change a little like governor, so most of part is from mine,
here's the source, my github

Cheers for that squadzone.
tux-kid's - As your Kernel is based on the above source, all you need to do is provide the source to the files you edited/changed and those files only.
If you'd like I can help you get set up on GitHub, as I'm sure many others here could too. XDA is here to embrace, help & encourage development.

Damm i want to build my own kernel from source
But there are only tutorials to mod the kernel
Can anyone provide a guide/tutoial of it ?
herpderp © aint got money to pay to my fish

squadzone said:
he use my source, and only change a little like governor, so most of part is from mine,
here's the source, my github
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wuhihi, thank's squadzone ..
soalnya ane dah tuliskan source nya dari ente ...
ntar ane coba upload dah ^^ :cipok

andyharney said:
Cheers for that squadzone.
tux-kid's - As your Kernel is based on the above source, all you need to do is provide the source to the files you edited/changed and those files only.
If you'd like I can help you get set up on GitHub, as I'm sure many others here could too. XDA is here to embrace, help & encourage development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have account on GitHub but i dont have connection to upload my source ..
i just edit some file on source from squadzone

spacecaker said:
Damm i want to build my own kernel from source
But there are only tutorials to mod the kernel
Can anyone provide a guide/tutoial of it ?
herpderp © aint got money to pay to my fish
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and if you got the turotial.. i will be excited if you wanna share it with me too

Related

[ROM] AUG 05 2010 - Cronos Droid Version 2.1.3 Fully Stable

MOD EDIT
Here at XDA, we try very hard to work with everyone to resolve issues before they result in actions such as banning or locking threads. Unfortunately, hard as we try, we are not always able to meet those goals via ways that would be more desirable and seemingly more peaceful.
Here recently we have been having some issues with some Android devs who work with the Android Kernel. While we were able to work out the issues with quite a few devs we were sadly unable to reach such a peaceful settlement with the Android ROM dev Feeyo.
Before we go any farther into the underlying problems that we have had getting these issues resolved with this particular Android Dev, lets go over real quick what the main concern is about.
The Android kernel which is present in EVERY single ROM is an ever-growing community project. Android devs from all around the world have put their hard work into an open source project simply in an attempt to make the Android project better as a whole. While I am sure that all of these Android devs made these contributions to the kernels as a result of things that they wanted or needed to see develop within Android, they made their work available to ALL of us so that we could ALL benefit from their talents.
That being said, the Linux kernel is released under what is called the GNU GPL. (General Public License)
Basically this license allows for the Android kernel to be freely used and modified under the condition that the source of the kernel be released to the public. This "release" can be handled two ways, by either providing a direct link to the source where it can be downloaded, modified and reused under the GNU GPL, or by a written statement that offers the to provide the kernel source to anyone whom requests it. While I realize that I have only outlined a small portion of the GNU GPL, the bottom line here is that the COMPLETE and WORKING kernel source that was MODIFIED by anyone MUST be provided to the community, for any version of publicly released software.
You can find the full text of the GNU GPL licence here:
Herein, lies our problem. We here at XDA have had MULTIPLE interactions with the Android ROM dev, Feeyo, in regards to the specific problem that he has not followed these GNU GPL guidelines. There have been multiple instances where users have requested his Kernel source and he has continually refused to provide this source, or he has provided us with non working and otherwise incomplete source, or invalid or unmodified source.
The first thing we need to show is that Feeyo was MODIFYING the Android kernel source. Below is a screenshot that proves just that.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Above, you can see the Kernel version says "2.6.29-opt-40-Cronos [email protected]#1", The only known way to put you name there, in the kernel, is to modify and compile the kernel yourself. You have to edit a file within the kernel source called .config.
We also have proof by Feeyo’s own release notes in his ROMs that he has modified the kernel source code as well. For example, the changelog for his kernel below shows the changes made between versions.
Here is another screenshot where he talks of changes he made to his kernel:
All of that being said, Feeyo has definitely made various improvements to the Android Kernel source by modifying that source and he has publicly released this kernel to the community.
In an attempt to resolve this matter we made various outreaches to Feeyo, including a moderator by the name of 12aon making several attempts to get this resolved... I’ve added some screenshots of the dialog that they exchanged...
Here we can see that we were trying to resolve the issue with Feeyo and he stated that he would no longer provide or distribute the 2.6.32 Kernel that he was working on because he didn’t intend on releasing code with he labeled as “messy”.
Feeyo did indeed stop providing that 2.6.32 kernel as far as we know, however he then continued to modify the 2.6.29 kernel source and distribute that in his ROMs again without following the GNU GPL guidelines.The sources for this 2.6.32 kernel were never released.
It is the decision of the XDA moderators that since Feeyo has no rights to use or distribute the Linux kernel without making available his valid source code and modifications, his ROMs and associated kernel releases will be treated as warez under forum rule 6
Here in this screenshot we are again trying to get him to post the sources to his Kernel after he released a ROM that mention various enhancements or modifications to the Android Kernel that he was providing in his ROM. Feeyo then sent us another PM as shown below:
In this PM Feeyo is stating that he did provide his sources... However, it was not complete and was missing many things that were needed to compile the Android Kernel in such a fashion that it would run on the Hero. Additionally, as these sources are not kept up to date, they do not meet the requirements of the GPL to release sources as used to compile the distributed binary kernel.Below is the link to the thread that he posted containing his supposed kernel source:
Supposed Sources used in Cronos Droid early releases
That thread was locked to preserve proof to the fact that the source he provided was not complete. In fact, on post #11 within that thread he even confirms that the source is not complete, again this is not following the GNU GPL guidelines.
Additionally, the screenshots below show occasions where Feeyo acknowledged he would not provide complete sources, by deliberately withholding the entire kernel source or constituent parts.
We have made this long explanation of recent events available to you, the community, for two reasons.
First of all, we realize that Feeyo is a talented dev and that his ROMs are well liked within the community. With this in mind, we wanted it to be known that the decisions that we have made here today are not decisions that have been taken lightly or irrationally made. This decision included opinions from AT LEAST 5 other Senior mods here at XDA. We feel that a full explanation of our actions is something that we owe the community and we truly regret that it has come down to this.
Secondly, this will be a marking point, I don’t want to say that this is an example because it was never intended to be an example. However the fact remains that this incident has caused quite a stir within XDA and from this point on we will be making sure whenever possible that any Android dev that modifies and publicly releases the Android kernel is following the GNU GPL guidelines.
The GNU GPL guidelines are important because they ensure that credit is given where credit is due and it also ensures that continued improvement, advancement, and development of such products under the GNU GPL continue to ensue. As part of the Android community, which is an OPEN SOURCE community, we owe it to ourselves and the ENTIRE community to make sure that we are staying true to the notion of an open source platform. Keeping your sources to yourself while working on a project that is open source and released under the GNU GPL is not staying true to what being open source is all about.
At this point in time, Feeyo has received a 30 day temporary ban for refusing to help us resolve this matter in a peaceful manner and for ultimately violating Rule #6 and Rule #9 which state:
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, either pay or find your cracks and serials somewhere else. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained.
9. Don't get us in trouble.
Don't post copyrighted materials or do other things that will obviously lead to legal trouble. If you wouldn't do it on your own homepage, you probably don't want to do it here either. This does not mean we agree with everything the software piracy lobby try to impose on us, it simply means you cannot break any laws here, since we'll end up dealing with legal hassle caused by you. Please use common sense: respect the forum, its users, and those that write great code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Furthermore, at this time, all ROMs posted by Feeyo that do not follow the GNU GPL where applicable will be locked and the links to the ROMs removed.
During this time that Feeyo is away, we sincerely hope that he will come around and upon his return, which we thoroughly hope for, he will post the sources to his Android kernel changes in the spirit of the open source community and the GNU GPL and participate in a more supporting manner.
Best Regards,
The XDA Moderator team

Thank you for sharing. Are you gonna post screenshots, this makes it more interesting to download.

thanks finish downloading now and will report back when flashing

Sure downloading app now.

forget the screenshots, how did you get the kernel? is it/can it be overclocked? Can it be used with other ROMs (CM5.0.7 etc.)

it sounds very interesting let me test it and tell u .

downloading now, hope it is true what you're saying...

What about the kernel?

cyberkid2002 said:
forget the screenshots, how did you get the kernel? is it/can it be overclocked? Can it be used with other ROMs (CM5.0.7 etc.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not added any overclock options into the kernel. I think its fast enough the way it is. But try it out and let me know. Maybe I will add some patches so that you can overclock it

How did you get the 2.6.29 hero kernel sources?

this sounds great! ima try it now, is this kernel the kernel everyone's been waiting for?

I can't get it working, did a full wipe and keeps hanging on HERO logo.

Downloading and feed back

Flashing within 2 min
Get some sleep, or try it out? Guess?
started up, runs fine so long

RaduG said:
How did you get the 2.6.29 hero kernel sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From my understanding, all the OP did was take the Eris .29 kernel source & ported anything needed for the GSM Hero to run.

Is this a sense rom?

Downloading now,, hope this is the one I have been searching for....

reidefors82 said:
Flashing within 2 min
Get some sleep, or try it out? Guess?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Getting some sleep

Added screenshots.

Is the green/bad autofocus camera bug fixed?

[ROM] AUG 10 2010 - Cronos 2.2 (Froyo) 0.2

finally i download now...fastttttttt..
no greek support?

thank you sooooo much! i've been waiting for this for a loooong time... finally i have it...thanks again...

oh you made it!

Going to flash now and see if it is an improvement to the fusion!rom

Going to try it now

How about the google applications? did you include them?

Going to give it a go now. Will post impressions.

cokbok said:
How about the google applications? did you include them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they are included.

pornogeroc said:
finally i download now...fastttttttt..
no greek support?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry. Language list is not complete. Greek is supported.

Does anyone else have a notification about a blank SD card due to unsupported file system?

Brooks316 said:
Does anyone else have a notification about a blank SD card due to unsupported file system?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EXT partitions are not supported. Froyo will see it as an unsupported Filesystem and wants to Format it. Backup your data first and then let Froyo do the formatting please.

this is a very good begin, but i wanna know, how i can enable jit, thanks for your work guy

Sow said:
this is a very good begin, but i wanna know, how i can enable jit, thanks for your work guy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JIT is enabled. Hardcoded into the DalvikVM sources I compiled.

Feeyo said:
Sorry. Language list is not complete. Greek is supported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What other languages are missing? How about norwegian?
... and thanks for the ROM, btw!

skandahle said:
What other languages are missing? How about norwegian?
... and thanks for the ROM, btw!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Supported.

Great to see a new Froyo ROM on the scene! Look forward to seeing it grow into one of the best...
For now, my early impressions are that it suffers from the same problems as other Froyo ROMs have / do.
To name two (and aside from the obvious):
* LED notifications
* Google Mail App displays at incorrect resolution for Hero

It might be a funny question but... All other Froyo releases I tried have been getting really laggy after installing all the applications I like and then 3-4 hours of usage. I use a task manager to kill applications so that a lot of memory is always free.
Would I have the same problem with this ROM? I am sure you have been using it for a couple of days at least before going public.
I would test it out by myself but formatting my SD card is going to take a lot of time for backing up, etc.
BR.

cokbok said:
It might be a funny question but... All other Froyo releases I tried have been getting really laggy after installing all the applications I like and then 3-4 hours of usage. I use a task manager to kill applications so that a lot of memory is always free.
Would I have the same problem with this ROM? I am sure you have been using it for a couple of days at least before going public.
I would test it out by myself but formatting my SD card is going to take a lot of time for backing up, etc.
BR.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not yet run this build for a few days at it just came out of the oven...
But I did run some of the older builds of mine a few days and for me it stayed at the same performance. Although I do not have a lot of apps installed..
After installing apps you will need to give it a reboot to optimize the freshly installed packages.

Feeyo said:
I have not yet run this build for a few days at it just came out of the oven...
But I did run some of the older builds of mine a few days and for me it stayed at the same performance. Although I do not have a lot of apps installed..
After installing apps you will need to give it a reboot to optimize the freshly installed packages.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the speedy response and support. Appreciated.
I have a few questions in addition to the ones I've already asked.
1) When you long press a textbox and select "Input Method" option, the keyboard appears twice. Is it normal?
2) The news and weather application cannot find "Sofia" or "Sofia, Bulgaria" as a location. Do you think that might be a bug in the ROM or in the application itself?
BR.

[DEV][KERNEL]custom kernel for ICS based (update23072012)

I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO YOUR PHONE BY FLASHING THIS KERNEL
Feauture :
Kernel update to 2.6.35.14
No more white screen on boot and splash screen work
UV module include
Ondemandx ,245 min ,800 set default
More Scaling Governor
Deepsleep and more tweak on ramdisk
How to :
put file zip on sdcard
go to recovery mode
mount /system
install file zip
Link :
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?ig324kc1aavzgt7
Do With Your Own Risk
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
tell me if you find bugs not to galaxyics
source : https://github.com/tuxkids/kernel_ics

-reserved-

IT'S VERY BAD IDEA TO USE IT!
Our kernel have ICS stuff like: genlock, memalloc, kgsl, ksm, compatibility with Adreno libs and finally - a flicker fix. Even if it basing on our github code - it's still not as up-to-date as our kernel. Believe me.
We are working hard to provide you as stable ICS as it possible.

marcin1147 said:
IT'S VERY BAD IDEA TO USE IT!
Our kernel have ICS stuff like: genlock, memalloc, kgsl, ksm, compatibility with Adreno libs and finally - a flicker fix. Even if it basing on our github code - it's still not as up-to-date as our kernel. Believe me.
We are working hard to provide you as stable ICS as it possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, try that before you say ...
i modify your source on github ...
not pure on your source ..
and this kernel have test by my friend

I don't have to test it, because i know it haven't got "ICS stuff like: genlock, memalloc, kgsl, ksm, compatibility with Adreno libs and finally - a flicker fix". Okay, it's good because of many governors and IO scheulders but it's not as good for ICS as our kernel.

marcin1147 said:
IT'S VERY BAD IDEA TO USE IT!
Our kernel have ICS stuff like: genlock, memalloc, kgsl, ksm, compatibility with Adreno libs and finally - a flicker fix. Even if it basing on our github code - it's still not as up-to-date as our kernel. Believe me.
We are working hard to provide you as stable ICS as it possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why dont you update it??

marcin1147 said:
I don't have to test it, because i know it haven't got "ICS stuff like: genlock, memalloc, kgsl, ksm, compatibility with Adreno libs and finally - a flicker fix". Okay, it's good because of many governors and IO scheulders but it's not as good for ICS as our kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL up to you, me and my friend have tested this kernel and not found flicker ...

We'll update sources on github with next release, but I can't find any sense of this kernel.

tux-kid's said:
LOL up to you, me and my friend have tested this kernel and not found flicker ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So... Tell me how did you fixed flickering.

marcin1147 said:
IT'S VERY BAD IDEA TO USE IT!
Our kernel have ICS stuff like: genlock, memalloc, kgsl, ksm, compatibility with Adreno libs and finally - a flicker fix. Even if it basing on our github code - it's still not as up-to-date as our kernel. Believe me.
We are working hard to provide you as stable ICS as it possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i suggest you not to underestimate someone.. and never think that you're better than tuxkid.. i have tried this kernel.. i know yours is still better.. but this kernel is not bad.. besides he do all the stuff alone (maybe) ..
As long as i know.. CyanogenMod and Google itselfs let everyone to do everything with their source.. so why don't you all do the same thing? This Is Open Source dude.. no offence
i know it's up to you if you want to looking for some profit.. that's OK ..
last but least... Correct me if i'm wrong..

Macław said:
We'll update sources on github with next release, but I can't find any sense of this kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
marcin1147 said:
So... Tell me how did you fixed flickering.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmmm
basically IMHO, if you work on GPL project, anyone also can build it with your source.
my suggestion you should make a code to protect your rights.
ex:
- create a code with encrypted text (md5/sha/tr) to protect [email protected] in middle of kernel code. so anyone cant replace it & claim your work easily.
and dont judge/blame anyone who want to try and learn about it
hmmm, but i also not 100% understand with GPL
CMIIW
lol

marcin1147 said:
So... Tell me how did you fixed flickering.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just modified config from your source ...

tioammar said:
i suggest you not to underestimate someone.. and never think that you're better than tuxkid.. i have tried this kernel.. i know yours is still better.. but this kernel is not bad.. besides he do all the stuff alone (maybe) ..
As long as i know.. CyanogenMod and Google itselfs let everyone to do everything with their source.. so why don't you all do the same thing? This Is Open Source dude.. no offence
i know it's up to you if you want to looking for some profit.. that's OK ..
last but least... Correct me if i'm wrong..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
phiexz said:
hmmm
basically IMHO, if you work on GPL project, anyone also can build it with your source.
my suggestion you should make a code to protect your rights.
ex:
- create a code with encrypted text (md5/sha/tr) to protect [email protected] in middle of kernel code. so anyone cant replace it & claim your work easily.
hmmm, but i also not 100% understand with GPL
CMIIW
lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL hehe, me too i'm not 100% understand with GPL ...

tioammar said:
i suggest you not to underestimate someone.. and never think that you're better than tuxkid.. i have tried this kernel.. i know yours is still better.. but this kernel is not bad.. besides he do all the stuff alone (maybe) ..
As long as i know.. CyanogenMod and Google itselfs let everyone to do everything with their source.. so why don't you all do the same thing? This Is Open Source dude.. no offence
i know it's up to you if you want to looking for some profit.. that's OK ..
last but least... Correct me if i'm wrong..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, i modified this kernel alone but i get reference from tj_style and delano

Read please!
"CYANOGEN" SAID;
CyanogenMod is a free, community built, aftermarket firmware distribution of Android, which is designed to increase performance and reliability over stock Android for your device
"OPENHANDSET ALLIANCE(GOOGLE)" SAID;
ANDROID SYSTEM IS FREE, under APACHE ROLE'S. WHICH WHO MODIFIED, EVEN JUST "LITTLE" CHANGE WILL MADE IT AS THAT MODDERS OWN.
>> THATS WHY MODERATORS IN EVERY FORUM ALLOWED A STOCK TO MODIFIED AND ON DEVELOPMENT SECTION.
"LINUS TORVALD" AND ALL "UNIX" DISTRO SAID ; WE MAKE A NEW RULES FOR KERNEL WHICH IS "GPLv2" ,So FROM NOW ON WE "FORCE ALL DEVELOPERS" TO ALWAYS UPDATES THEIR "KERNEL SOURCE CODE" IF ANY CHANGE'S ARE MADE . TO PREVENT OF WRONG ARGUMENTATION OF OWNERING THE KERNEL. IF U SAY U "OWN IT" U MUST ALWAYS UPDATES SOURCECODE UNDER "CIRCUMSTANCES".
SO GUYS "START INTROSPECTION" FOR WHAT U DO ,!

aprizND said:
"CYANOGEN" SAID;
CyanogenMod is a free, community built, aftermarket firmware distribution of Android, which is designed to increase performance and reliability over stock Android for your device
"OPENHANDSET ALLIANCE(GOOGLE)" SAID;
ANDROID SYSTEM IS FREE, under APACHE ROLE'S. WHICH WHO MODIFIED, EVEN JUST "LITTLE" CHANGE WILL MADE IT AS THAT MODDERS OWN.
>> THATS WHY MODERATORS IN EVERY FORUM ALLOWED A STOCK TO MODIFIED AND ON DEVELOPMENT SECTION.
"LINUS TORVALD" AND ALL "UNIX" DISTRO SAID ; WE MAKE A NEW RULES FOR KERNEL WHICH IS "GPLv2" ,So FROM NOW ON WE "FORCE ALL DEVELOPERS" TO ALWAYS UPDATES THEIR "KERNEL SOURCE CODE" IF ANY CHANGE'S ARE MADE . TO PREVENT OF WRONG ARGUMENTATION OF OWNERING THE KERNEL. IF U SAY U "OWN IT" U MUST ALWAYS UPDATES SOURCECODE UNDER "CIRCUMSTANCES".
SO GUYS "START INTROSPECTION" FOR WHAT U DO ,!
AND BY THE WAY SAD TO SAY BUT, WHY CYANOGEN TEAM REMOVED THE "KANG" ?
>> ITS BECAUSE CM TEAM SURVEY, AND TOO MUCH PEOPLE MAKE IT CYANOGENMOD LIKE A "CLOSE SOURCE". AND BY THE WAY "STEVE KONDIK" CHOOSE LG OPTIMUS ONE TEAM(TEAM M.A.C) AS THE GOOD EXAMPLE OF BEING OPENSOURCE. AND FURTHER THEY GOT JOINED TO OFFICIAL CYANOGEN(MOD) TEAM.
EVEN INFACT IS THEY QUITE LOW ON UPDATING, BUT "THEY PROVE OPENSOURCE DEVELOPMENT IN RIGHTEOUS".
SORRY "SENIORS MOD'S & ADMIN" FOR THIS , BUT FOR NOW ITS NEEDED.
TUX BRO USE TE#MHACKS"NG JE DARI PADE INI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NICE! you got the point bro ...
Thanks God I'm Indonesian.. semua orangnya berpikiran terbuka

aprizND said:
"CYANOGEN" SAID;
CyanogenMod is a free, community built, aftermarket firmware distribution of Android, which is designed to increase performance and reliability over stock Android for your device
"OPENHANDSET ALLIANCE(GOOGLE)" SAID;
ANDROID SYSTEM IS FREE, under APACHE ROLE'S. WHICH WHO MODIFIED, EVEN JUST "LITTLE" CHANGE WILL MADE IT AS THAT MODDERS OWN.
>> THATS WHY MODERATORS IN EVERY FORUM ALLOWED A STOCK TO MODIFIED AND ON DEVELOPMENT SECTION.
"LINUS TORVALD" AND ALL "UNIX" DISTRO SAID ; WE MAKE A NEW RULES FOR KERNEL WHICH IS "GPLv2" ,So FROM NOW ON WE "FORCE ALL DEVELOPERS" TO ALWAYS UPDATES THEIR "KERNEL SOURCE CODE" IF ANY CHANGE'S ARE MADE . TO PREVENT OF WRONG ARGUMENTATION OF OWNERING THE KERNEL. IF U SAY U "OWN IT" U MUST ALWAYS UPDATES SOURCECODE UNDER "CIRCUMSTANCES".
SO GUYS "START INTROSPECTION" FOR WHAT U DO ,!
AND BY THE WAY SAD TO SAY BUT, WHY CYANOGEN TEAM REMOVED THE "KANG" ?
>> ITS BECAUSE CM TEAM SURVEY, AND TOO MUCH PEOPLE MAKE IT CYANOGENMOD LIKE A "CLOSE SOURCE". AND BY THE WAY "STEVE KONDIK" CHOOSE LG OPTIMUS ONE TEAM(TEAM M.A.C) AS THE GOOD EXAMPLE OF BEING OPENSOURCE. AND FURTHER THEY GOT JOINED TO OFFICIAL CYANOGEN(MOD) TEAM.
EVEN INFACT IS THEY QUITE LOW ON UPDATING, BUT "THEY PROVE OPENSOURCE DEVELOPMENT IN RIGHTEOUS".
SORRY "SENIORS MOD'S & ADMIN" FOR THIS , BUT FOR NOW ITS NEEDED.
TUX BRO USE TE#MHACKS"NG JE DARI PADE INI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL thank's a lot for information ..
wkwkwkw sip2 om lain kali ane ambil source dari TE#MHACKS"NG ...

yeagh further more i got many "SUPPORT FROM MODS" HOPE ADMINS TOO !!
TOSS, "GIVE ME HAND FIVE"!

aprizND said:
yeagh further more i got many "SUPPORT FROM MODS" HOPE ADMINS TOO !!
TOSS, "GIVE ME HAND FIVE"!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeagh ...
wkwkwkw TOSS ..
thank's a lot to open my mind about open source

Guys, stop spamming.
1. I'll update my sources, but with next release, it needs some changes.
2. I still cannot find any sense of making kernels like that.
3. PLEASE, DO NOT REPORT ANY PROBLEMS WITH CM9 IF YOU AREN'T USING ANY OTHER KERNEL THAN ONE DEVELOPED BY US!
Why I didn't updated my sources from a long time?
Say thanks to all guys, who used my sources. They was use it without any word like: "It built using GalaxyICS sources" or something like that. I was be very angry, and this is cause of closed GalaxyICS sources. It really hurts when somebody using your sources and he not adding adnotation about that.
I hope you can understand me.

[KERNEL][GCC5.2][TA-MOD] Xcelerate [MIUI|KK|LP][Synapse][Updated:SAYONARA]

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
SOURCE | CREDITS | DISCLAIMER | DOWNLOADS | FEATURES | FAQ
**Snapdragon™ is a registered trademark owned by Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
**Synapse™ is a registered trademark owned by @Andreilux
**(v1)Xcelerate Logo™ is created by @fareed_extreme
**(v2)Xcelerate Logo™ is created by @Sharan Narayan
**(v3)Xcelerate Logo™ is created by @JeGuina
XDA:DevDB Information
Xcelerate Custom Kernel, Kernel for the Xiaomi Redmi 1S
Contributors
kairi_zeroblade
Source Code: https://github.com/zeroblade1984/Xiaomi-MSM8226
Kernel Special Features: Good Battery life, Thermal Engine, Custom Hotplug, Xiaomi KCAL control
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: Production build 24
Stable Release Date: 2015-12-18
Created 2015-01-12
Last Updated 2015-12-18

Reserved
Short Credit list:
(more people here:Github)
Armani Devs (@jsevi83 and @Kra1o5) for initial device bring-up
Anybody who has unselfishly helped me in anyway(through donations, testing, promotions and moral support)
Short Feature list:
(Full feature list including Developmental Goals are on Github)
Basic Governors(I won't add Ripoffs, Ondemand is in continuous development to give you a balance between savings and performance)
Built using my own GCC 4.8.x/4.9.x/5.1.x Toolchain built across the standards of Google's own Toolchain..
Simple and no fancy stuff..(more does not guarantee it's better)
Uses a simple free and user friendly application called Synapse by @AndreiLux for configuration purposes(slightly adding more functionality)
A Few Notes:
Be advised that this kernel is best used "As is" i do want to prohibit the use of scripts that they say "enhances performance and battery" just use the kernel as it is..everything is managed automatically by the kernel and rest assured continuous innovations are en-route.
Supporters:
I would like to express my sincerest gratitude by saying thank you and a continued commitment to get things better on this device via what i do best..kernels..
And these individuals who are generously helping me fund the device, deserve the same credit for that whole-hearted effort in doing so..(they come in no particular order)
Praveen Kumar
Amit Painter
Jagdish Shirsat
My sincerest Thanks!!(once again)
Current Piggy Bank: 59$
Compatibility list:
According to testers/users feedback the Kernel works on the FOLLOWING ROMS(tested)
CyanogenMod 11(Stable)
PAC ROM(Stable)
CR Droid(Stable)
Carbon(Stable as reported by one User and Tester)
Any ROM based on Armani Devs sources
The list will grow as soon as Testers/Users can provide means and ways to make this compatible with everything..
All you need to know about TA-MOD

Reserved
Grab user banners here:

Xiomi is in for a real treat! Good to see! :good:

Good to see one more kernel..
Thanx...I am the first to try your work...downloading...

The Governor and Scheduler rosters are also part of the features as well as the Toolchain used to build this Kernel, they should be visible at the OP. Thanks, will try this as soon as I get to a power source.

I can't see the kernel features in post 1?
Sent from my HM 1S

gummie said:
The Governor and Scheduler rosters are also part of the features as well as the Toolchain used to build this Kernel, they should be visible at the OP. Thanks, will try this as soon as I get to a power source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
xylu said:
I can't see the kernel features in post 1?
Sent from my HM 1S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kindly click links on OP they should lead you to my Github where a full WIKI of what you are asking are located and can be found..I don't usually enjoy posting long OP's..:good:
I am also not fond of alot of cpu governors that are ripoffs..i just try to optimize Ondemand to my liking..if you have doubts on my statement read over this thread..also the last few pages were a milestone..
i have added a screenshot of last night's last beta test..
myrigon said:
Xiomi is in for a real treat! Good to see! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah for sure these guys are gonna love it.. they are in for one hell of a ride..
EDIT: wake gestures is a WIP as i am trying to clean some stuff out..all your other requests like Voltage control are WIP(we have already have this working on Desire 816 test kernel just a few minor stuff needs to be worked out..also this change needs a DT edit and unfortunately using the DT's supplied by Xiaomi, the device does not bootup..without the proper DT's the voltage control won't work unless someone would like to collaborate with me on this..the same thing goes for GPU and CPU Overclocking..)

kairi_zeroblade said:
kindly click links on OP they should lead you to my Github where a full WIKI of what you are asking are located and can be found..I don't usually enjoy posting long OP's..:good:
i have added a screenshot of last night's last beta test..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I know and already read the whole thing but I also didn't see the Governor and Schedulers there. It's just that some people would really appreciate to see what they are dealing with first hand. Links to changelog is also good just for others to keep on tabs. You also have that "Features:" thingy so I thought you would put something there.

May I flash this kernel on stock ROM? I don't see any explanation about this on faq. Thanks

anangnovi said:
May I flash this kernel on stock ROM? I don't see any explanation about this on faq. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently the kernel is tested only on CM11 R15...You can give a try but not sure whether it will work...

anangnovi said:
May I flash this kernel on stock ROM? I don't see any explanation about this on faq. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well its based on Xiaomi's official source..if you can provide me stock boot.img from stock ROM i can repack this build to be able to boot on Stock ROM(MIUI) which i would love too..
OR
Will do an anykernel Installer next update which might come in a few days time( i have to release to my M7 and M4 threads )..
EDIT: I am also looking for a small group of testers.. both for MIUI stock ROM and AOSP based ROM's..

I've been using @kairi_zeroblade's Xceed kernel on the HTC m7. His custom hot plug work, ondemand CPU governor refinements and other coding efforts quite simply deliver the best battery life, screen-on-time, and smoothest performance that I've ever experienced on this phone.
This is a perfectionist developer who's going way beyond the simple code collecting, tweaking and compiling that goes into so many of the "custom" kernels we find on XDA.
Enjoy!

kairi_zeroblade said:
well its based on Xiaomi's official source..if you can provide me stock boot.img from stock ROM i can repack this build to be able to boot on Stock ROM(MIUI) which i would love too..
OR
Will do an anykernel Installer next update which might come in a few days time( i have to release to my M7 and M4 threads )..
EDIT: I am also looking for a small group of testers.. both for MIUI stock ROM and AOSP based ROM's..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really want to help your work, so.. where i can/create find the stock boot.img? I'll try to provide it for you.
And i like to test your kernel on my stock MIUI v.45 and give a report, when it's able to boot on stock ROM. Thanks

@kairi_zeroblade !! Awesome work mate, good to see you have started working for our device !! I have heard a lot about your kernel for HTC M7 from my frnds, they say your kernel just rocks... Now its time for Redmi 1S to get some love from you... Going to try it tonight .. Thnax a lot for your contribution !!

kairi_zeroblade said:
well its based on Xiaomi's official source..if you can provide me stock boot.img from stock ROM i can repack this build to be able to boot on Stock ROM(MIUI) which i would love too..
OR
Will do an anykernel Installer next update which might come in a few days time( i have to release to my M7 and M4 threads )..
Edit: Yeah do it as Anykernel 2.0 because that would be more friendlier since Redmi 1S is going to get multiple versions of Android.
I like your style Dude, simple kernel. I too don't care, really for many features too as long as I get Interactive, SIO, Voltage Control and msm_hotplug or intelli-plug (either of the two would do for me).
EDIT: I am also looking for a small group of testers.. both for MIUI stock ROM and AOSP based ROM's..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can be one of the Testers on Stock, I'll be on CM11 for a while.
I like your style Dude, simple kernel. I too don't care, really for many features too as long as I get Interactive, SIO, Voltage Control and msm_hotplug or intelli-plug (either of the two would do for me).
Edit: Yeah do it as Anykernel 2.0 because that would be more friendlier since Redmi 1S is going to get multiple versions of Android.

Good to see a renowned Dev working for a little device. BTW Cezar bro, hats off to your work and on behalf of user of Redmi 1s, I welcome you on board here....
Here is last night's usage. I kept out of charge at 72%. WiFi always on, mobile network always on, no tweaks, nothing done to CPU...
But best back up, it was at 67% when I woke up in the morning....
Sent From:-
""The Little Beast of XIAOMI""

Here is the entropy score from synapse...awesome Kairi bro....

kairi_zeroblade said:
well its based on Xiaomi's official source..if you can provide me stock boot.img from stock ROM i can repack this build to be able to boot on Stock ROM(MIUI) which i would love too..
OR
Will do an anykernel Installer next update which might come in a few days time( i have to release to my M7 and M4 threads )..
EDIT: I am also looking for a small group of testers.. both for MIUI stock ROM and AOSP based ROM's..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is Miui V45 boot.img taken directly from zip recovery updater dropbox, will love to try it if you repack it

Hello devs, Is it possible to work on the lollipop kernel as we have a lollipop rom released for our device....
Really looking forward to that

Lenovo Z6 ( not Pro or Lite ) L78121 source code

I got in contact with Lenovo US about GPL compliance and they released the source for the L78121.
Here they are: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U0VQlD689KQjLK0b3kYALXrk1-WdkuT5/view?usp=sharing
Hopefully these can now be used to make custom ROMs and recoveries.

Heyyo, nicely done! I've passed on the info about the kernel source code to Jony Junior who said he was working on Lenovo L78121 so hopefully progress can be made with this!

Cool stuff, thanks a lot. I was thinking that if no one else will pick up this work I'll try to do it myself but I don't really have too much experience with this.
Glad it can be of use to someone. It took 6 months to actually get the code and I had to write a physical mail to Lenovo HQ in the US but at the end the GPL does work.

@mforce2 , any luck on working on the source code? The guy I was talking to seems afk so I'm unsure if he's going to do anything with it, oof...

Well to be fair I didn't really work on the code at all till now. I was hoping someone else might pick up the work from here but it doesn't seem so.
I don't really know exactly how to work with these Android things as a developer but I can give it a shot I guess.
I'll try making some TWRP first.

mforce2 said:
I got in contact with Lenovo US about GPL compliance and they released the source for the L78121.
Here they are: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U0VQlD689KQjLK0b3kYALXrk1-WdkuT5/view?usp=sharing
Hopefully these can now be used to make custom ROMs and recoveries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, can I request for the Lenovo Z5 jd2018 kernel source code, I have been using this device for years but the developer still has not released the source code for this device, I ask you to ask Lenovo about the source code of this device, if they release the source code, can I compile custom kernel, thank you very much

Fitrnzir.__ said:
Hi, can I request for the Lenovo Z5 jd2018 kernel source code, I have been using this device for years but the developer still has not released the source code for this device, I ask you to ask Lenovo about the source code of this device, if they release the source code, can I compile custom kernel, thank you very much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot request on your behalf. Write to Lenovo legal. The address is in settings, about phone, legal information , open source information.
You can find services that will send the physical letter in the US.
Include your email in your letter and wait for them to write black to you. It might take a few months unfortunately but they will.

ThE_MarD said:
@mforce2 , any luck on working on the source code? The guy I was talking to seems afk so I'm unsure if he's going to do anything with it, oof...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is sad. I have this device as well. Was hoping it would get android 10 at least. But it seems none of the devs have this device.

mforce2 said:
Well to be fair I didn't really work on the code at all till now. I was hoping someone else might pick up the work from here but it doesn't seem so.
I don't really know exactly how to work with these Android things as a developer but I can give it a shot I guess.
I'll try making some TWRP first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great initiative. Hope you succeed in building roms for this device. Someone already has built TWRP for this device. Check this link.
English Community-Lenovo Community
May also suggest opening a telegram account dedicated to Z6 in order to attract more devs+custom ROM community.

Heyyo, still not seeing anyone working on it made me sad, so I at least downloaded the kernel source code, got the best CAF tag for the kernel match and then made a GitHub repo with that best CAF tag so that at least the kernel source code is on GitHub and there's a decent starting ground for anyone who wants to clean up the kernel source code and import the important bits into a kernel.
https://github.com/ThEMarD/android_kernel_lenovo_sm6150-opensource
I've also included the audio-kernel as a techpack as seen in the commit history
https://github.com/ThEMarD/android_kernel_lenovo_sm6150-opensource/commits/sourcecoderelease
Hopefully someone does something with this as I don't own a Leovo Z6 (L78121)
Here's the results of that best-caf-tag I ran too
Best CAF Tag Lenovo Z6 (L78121)
Best CAF Tag Lenovo Z6 (L78121). GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
gist.github.com

Ok, I've made TWRP for jd20 that has working decryption but the current test build is with the prebuilt kernel for now for the test1 build.
Download File List - twrp-for-jd20 - OSDN
Download File List - twrp-for-jd20 #osdn
osdn.net
Here is my source code:
GitHub - ThEMarD/android_device_lenovo_jd20-twrp
Contribute to ThEMarD/android_device_lenovo_jd20-twrp development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
I don't own a jd20, so tbh I'm unsure how much farther I will go.
@mforce2 I'd recommend checking this plus my last post

Heyyo @mforce2 and @Mahz4130 if you guys are interested in the work I've started so far for jd20 here it is. It compiles but it doesn't boot, so it needs more work (the kernel is mainly what I'm thinking of).
Lenovo Z6 (AKA, jd20 L78121)
WIP TWRP and Custom ROM trees. Lenovo Z6 (AKA, jd20 L78121) has 6 repositories available. Follow their code on GitHub.
github.com

Yeah really interested in this. I don't have much time now and I'm not sure what exactly to do. I mean I am a programmer but I've never really worked on an Android ROM before.
Let's get in touch. I'll try to contact you.

hello i have compiled the kernel and TWRP and it works
for build i used ubuntu-18.04.6 / jdk 8 / python2.7
ubuntu 20.04 not working
files fixed for assemblyhttps://disk.yandex.ru/d/EluQgNirmohCZw

ThE_MarD said:
Ok, I've made TWRP for jd20 that has working decryption but the current test build is with the prebuilt kernel for now for the test1 build.
Download File List - twrp-for-jd20 - OSDN
Download File List - twrp-for-jd20 #osdn
osdn.net
Here is my source code:
GitHub - ThEMarD/android_device_lenovo_jd20-twrp
Contribute to ThEMarD/android_device_lenovo_jd20-twrp development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
I don't own a jd20, so tbh I'm unsure how much farther I will go.
@mforce2 I'd recommend checking this plus my last post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tested this now, and it's working with decryption, the only problem is the brightness, can't adjust but still fine
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

@capricorn-1 just to check, did you assemble TWRP with the kernel source code the way it was from Lenovo or did you use one of my trees?

Mod edit - translated by https://www.deepl.com/translator:
Let's CREATE a GROUP and CHANNEL on the TELEGRAM dedicated to the Lenovo Z6 JD20
********************
Vamos CRIAR um GRUPO e um CANAL no TELEGRAM dedicado ao Lenovo Z6 JD20

VANSCY said:
Mod edit - translated by https://www.deepl.com/translator:
Let's CREATE a GROUP and CHANNEL on the TELEGRAM dedicated to the Lenovo Z6 JD20
********************
Vamos CRIAR um GRUPO e um CANAL no TELEGRAM dedicado ao Lenovo Z6 JD20
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@VANSCY
As courtesy, I've translated your above post. With reference to rule no. 4 of the XDA Forum Rules, please post in English or add at least an English translation to your Portuguese posts.
Spoiler: Rule No. 4
4. Use the English language.
We understand that with all the different nationalities, not everyone speaks English well, but please try. If you're really unable to post in English, use an online translator. You're free to include your original message in your own language, below the English translation. (This rule covers your posts, profile entries and signature). You could try :- https://translate.google.com/ or https://www.babelfish.com/ or use one of your choice.
Additionally, please be ware: As an exemption from the last bullet of rule no. 5 of the XDA Forum Rules, we grant only developers the privilege to share references to their social media in their own development threads. These conditions obviously don't apply to this thread or you. Do NOT attempt to share links to Telegram here on XDA.
Thanks for your cooperation!
Regards
Oswald Boelcke
Senior Moderator

Heyyo, so I think I'm giving up on the jd20. Sorry guys, but I don't own one and I don't have the spare time to work on it anyways. Hopefully, someone can finish what I started. I'll leave all my source code up on GitHub on that lenovo-jd20 project I made.

ThE_MarD said:
Heyyo, so I think I'm giving up on the jd20. Sorry guys, but I don't own one and I don't have the spare time to work on it anyways. Hopefully, someone can finish what I started. I'll leave all my source code up on GitHub on that lenovo-jd20 project I made.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you

Develop Bugs

welcome