dhd cm9 - Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

is anyone going to launch a cm9 for the dhd

We got 5 ics roms in the Dev section, think 2 out of the 5 are based on CM source, could be wrong. But give it about a month or two for DHD CM9 nightlies to be released.
Sent from my CM7 Nightly HTC Desire HD

Some of the rooms should be night lies as far as quality goes
Sent from my NookColor using xda premium

I have to say I've been using LC ICS now for about a month and it's good enough as a daily driver for me. Lord releases at least a build or two a day, and it's shaping up rather well. I say go for it!

I'm also using LC's IceColdSandwich, but I'm a cyanogen fan, so yes I'm going to launch cm9 when it comes out.

Let's just hope in cm9 they solve the problem with the widget to active/deactivate 3g - wireless connections etc. It's really anoying when it just doesn't respond and you have to reboot (CM7).

Guys we all know the rule for CM roms. Dont ask for ETAs. THings will be fixed and a rom will most likely be released when HTC releases the DHD ICS update in a few months. With this they will be able to fix the issues that come from not having proper kernel source.
Thread closed

Related

Aokp or cm9 from Aero?

Since I'm new to the Droid incredible 2, I wanna know what others think.
I'm running regular cm9 (aero) rite now and is fine, but I would like more options. I'm forcing my self to not flash ics miui
Sent from my Incredible 2 using xda premium
Honestly, cm9 is probably your best bet. Last I heard, our device specific aokp hadn't been updated in a while. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
Sent from my mobile typewriter with tapatalk
I run the newest cm9 by areo an miui ics. The newest miui is the smoolest an quickest ICS rom with the .9ics kernel but is harder on the battery than cm9 by areo. Both are really good roms for me aokp is not as smool as either of the other 2.
Aokp has been updated to build 29, which is based off of 4.0.4. It's pretty good overall. Most of the bugs have been worked out. I've ran it for a couple of days now, and really can't complain. Having said that, I restored back to CM9 tonight due to Aeroeven's newest build 4-4-12.
I use Ics reloaded with CM9, so I get most of the custom stuff that I like in Aokp, so really, Aokp and CM9 both work great for me. It's more just a matter of which do I feel like using today.
Digging the 4-04 Aerovan build and the latest Nitsuj MIUI build. I think Aero's build is a tiny bit somoother than the MIUI, but not by too much. Nitsuj is new at MIUI, but these builds of his are getting better and better.
Try them both.

[Q] Help an old Desire Z user out on ROM selection!

Hi there everyone!
I'm just after a little bit of help here.
I've had my Desire Z for a over a year now. I did run stock but with the hassle of the "home" key delay (it was terrible!) I rooted the phone and went with a version of MIUI (can't remember which now).
I love MIUI - except its music player downloaded strange albums, is there any way to fix this? (Jamon the power of love! lol)
Anyways - I recently tried a Sense 3 rom and it's awful. Laggy, slow, and a pain to use.
I really really want a stable, easy to use, smooth (doesn't have to be fassst!) just all-round-good ROM to use as my daily driver.
I'm throwing this one out to you - Which ROM can I try?
MIUI - do I just do the MIUI.us with bulletproof add-on?
CM7.1? I've never used this - which CM version is the best DD?
Sense UI - Any out there without home button lag?
I get the feeling the Desire Z is slowly becoming a "thing of the past" but I want to squeeze life out if it! I still got another year on my current contract! lol.
Thanks so much in advance for any tips, advice, etc.
For me, CM7 is easily the fastest. Use ILWT, its the fastest cm7 ROM I've tried, and loads of customisations
Sent from my Desire Z using XDA
Agree with Taz. ILWT is the best of both worlds, as it's feature-rich and is perhaps the fastest ROM around. If you decide to go with MIUI you might want to give Strawmetal.Mi a try.
CoSign, CM7 is the most stable 7.2 is the most recent version.
Agree with everyone. Been using ILWT for awhile and just recently changed to Andromadus beta3.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Virtuous G-Lite 2.0.1 is my favorite. It is fast; doesn't drain battery or consume every available RAM. I am using the ROM with stock launcher (default is LauncherPro) and I must I am glad I did.
Sent from my Desire Z flashed Virtuous G-Lite ROM 2.0.1
Thanks everyone for your most excellent replies!
I've flashed the ILWT Cm7 rom on my Desire Z and it's been great so far, really fast with no lag. I loved the design of MIUI and Sense/Sense 3 but I think I prefer something that is usable over fancy graphics which make the phone lag.
Can I customise the status bar? I would like to change it if possible, no problem if not.
Also, any other tweaks or tips most welcome. I want to get another 12 months out of this baby!
Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk 2
Andromadus audacity beta 3
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
CM9 Beta
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1492461
heathenasparagus said:
CM9 Beta
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1492461
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a FYI. That's not CM9 beta, it's a CM9 kang, just like Andromadus Audacity is. They're both based on CM9. CM9 is still in pre-release and may never be released officially for the Vision.
Cm7 can't go wrong.
Sent from my HTC_Amaze_4G using XDA
Elitemod
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1246682
That was a bit of a bump. I think the OP has already made his choice,
but Elite is indeed a very fast and stable rom.
I realize that the thread is month old now, so OP has probably already selected a rom, but in case someone else reads this thread looking for an answer to the same question...
I'm been using the Mimicry 1.1.0 ICS rom for the past week. I've tried out all of the ICS roms for the G2/Desire Z so far and Mimicry is the first that I would recommend as a daily driver. It is running quite fast and most of the bugs and graphical glitches of other ICS roms have been worked out.
CyanogenMod 9.0.0-RC0 BETA 14 - rockzzzz
preety fast, very good battery consumption, sexy
)Hi there!
Thanks for more rom suggestions!
Also, thanks to all those who suggested roms to use, I've read the thread every time it's been updated.
Just for everyone's info, I ended up installing CM7 ILWT - it's been excellent. Fast, stable, things work - it ticks all the boxes, really, and it means I can squeeze a few more months out of my phone! Actually, it's made me rethink upgrading next year.
It's been fine for my needs and I'm no longer pulling out my hair in frustration; there's no lag, no issues with functionality, and everything is in English (rather than Chinese, like MIUI's calendar lol - also the stock player doesn't make all my album covers turn to "Jamon - The Power Of Love" too!)
I may do a nandroid backup and try some of the other suggestions. I am a little bit reluctant to try any ICS roms, I've read posts describing things as being smooth but lots of things not working properly... I may give them a try anyway and see, but I am wary. One persons buttery smooth is another persons laggingly slow. I'd prefer to do away with flashy stuff for a phone that.. um.. "just works", and fast.
Thanks.
If you prefer Gingerbread, as I previously mentioned, I would recommend G-Lite 2.0.1 but for an ICS ROM Andromadus Audacity is the only choice you can take.
I installed too many ROMS these are the one that you can use with performance.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA
Hey there!
I did a nandroid of CM7 ILWT, wiped and installed Mimicry 1.1.1
I never knew ICS could be snappy!
I'm going to keep this one and see if it stays that way, so far I'm impressed!
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda app-developers app
Cyanogenmod 9 Beta 14!
Andromadus Mimicry v1.1.2

Difference between CM9 RC1 and CM9 Nightly builds?

Difference between CM9 RC1 and CM9 Nightly builds?
While they are both official release .
Thanks
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
RC is a point in time where they froze the code and made a ROM from that. RC builds they accept bug reports from.
Nightlies is a daily built ROM with all changes the cyanogenmod team have done in the repo. Changes done on nightly build can break the ROM, so you use that at your own risk. It is also the reason they don't accept bug reports on nightly builds since one can accept things to not work when trying new code.
Swiftkey'ed on my CM9 Galaxy Nexus
I've been flashing roms for maybe 6 months now, from galaxy s 2 to gnote, HTC eco 4g lte, flashed many many unnoficial CM9 roms.
Now I got the gnexus for about 2 days and am ready for root and flash .
Do you recommend the official CM9 RC1? As opposed to nightly builds?
I wanna just flash and chill until 4.1 becomes flawless.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
It's like asking: What's the difference between an old nightly and the newest nightly?
UltimateEnd said:
I've been flashing roms for maybe 6 months now, from galaxy s 2 to gnote, HTC eco 4g lte, flashed many many unnoficial CM9 roms.
Now I got the gnexus for about 2 days and am ready for root and flash .
Do you recommend the official CM9 RC1? As opposed to nightly builds?
I wanna just flash and chill until 4.1 becomes flawless.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the RC is a stable code so there will be less bugs then with a nightly. But then again you won't get the bleeding edge that Nightlies provide.
So go with nightly if you wanna test the new things, and stick to RC if you find Nightlies a little buggy.
Swiftkey'ed on my CM9 Galaxy Nexus
Cm9 RC 1 is old
Nightly is newer.
Cm team just gets tired of people *****ing about stable releases so they just call one of the nightlies as an RC. All the code freeze stuff doesn't matter.
Stability is exactly the same, there is no such thing as RC1 being truly stable.
Galaxy Nexus GSM
Guess ill just test both and see which I'd like more. I ran some benchmarks on the stock and it craps out at 2200, while I'm used to seeing 50+ with previous devices.
Super lag even just scrolling screens from left to right.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
CM9 nightlies are stable..
RC is just the 'official' tag to it.
treat it as open beta and close beta or alpha.
nxt said:
Cm9 RC 1 is old
Nightly is newer.
Cm team just gets tired of people *****ing about stable releases so they just call one of the nightlies as an RC. All the code freeze stuff doesn't matter.
Stability is exactly the same, there is no such thing as RC1 being truly stable.
Galaxy Nexus GSM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't go as far as saying stability is exactly the same, but I do agree with RC's not being truly stable. Using an RC puts less risk on the user because in the nightlies they are constantly tweaking code and they could break something that was previously functional with all the changes they make. If you look at it like this, you would probably also say that an RC is more stable than a nightly.

No CM9 for Desire :(

As Cyanogen posted on twitter
" The Nexus One, along with the other first generation Snapdragon devices (devices with the QSD8x50, MSM7x25, MSM7x27 and MSM7x27T SoCs), will not be supported beyond the CM 7.x (Gingerbread) branch. "
Sad news. But I'm not suprised, I've had my Desire for almost 2,5 year now. It's just getting old. There are great alternatives however, I am so glad there are still some skilled developers trying to port all this stuff, and with succes
I take it you know about the BCM rom based on CM9 source code.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1403113
Sad no official CM9 though
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
hans moleman said:
I take it you know about the BCM rom based on CM9 source code.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1403113
Sad no official CM9 though
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes i know but haven't tried it yet, need an everyday rom so GB will have to do for now anyway i heard the battery is really poor on BCM
I used Sandvold's ICS ROM as a daily. Works great! I'm struggling to think of a bug that pisses me off.... erm.... video rec is choppy or it just crashes, as does panorama BUT they do work... tbh i dont care about that but i wanted to say something
mattyyey said:
I used Sandvold's ICS ROM as a daily. Works great! I'm struggling to think of a bug that pisses me off.... erm.... video rec is choppy or it just crashes, as does panorama BUT they do work... tbh i dont care about that but i wanted to say something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm using sandvold's ics 0.16 as well, on stock hboot and it works smooth as gb roms.
Today bworks & dk_zero-cool released cm10 jellybean roms. bworks' rom look good gonna try it.
Nikez ICS is also runs very smoothly
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
This can't be news. Didn't Cyanogen say when they first started on the CM9 that older devices would not be officially supported?

CM9 vs AOSP vs AOKP

You'd think I would have figured this out by now, but having been a CM9 loyalist since day one I never bothered to learn what any of the others constitute beyond looking at what their acronyms stood for.
So my questions are as follows:
1) What exactly is the difference between Android Open Source, Android Open Kang, and CyanogenMod? My initial understanding (and this was when I followed the stuff more closely on the HP Touchpad) was that AOSP was built directly from the source Google released, CM9 took it and tweaked it for the specific device, and AOKP piggybacked off that to further tweak. I'm not so sure anymore.
2) Who's developing what? I thought the three branches were distinct but then I see sbrissen and chris seemingly making commits to both CM and AOSP, so I'm a little confused by this.
3) What's receiving the most development right now? I was on CM9 Alpha 6 for the longest time. I was debating from moving to a CM9 nightly or a CM10 beta, but the separate thread for AOSP Jellybean made me wonder what exactly that offered vs CM10. I was tempted to stay on CM9 just because it's been around longer but I haven't seen any "official" updates in awhile (i.e. ones on the e4gt.blogspot.com site--I'm sure the nightlies are official in some sense). Is it still even being worked on by the CM team anymore or have they all jumped ship to CM10 development?
As of right now I just flashed the FH13 ICS Stock onto my phone to see how that works out. When the other roms reach a better level of stability I'll probably move back to one of the CM's, but I wanted some idea of what I'm flashing before I do.
Thanks in advance.
Aosp is pure android like on a nexus.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
GiantJay said:
Aosp is pure android like on a nexus.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay...half-answered one of my three questions...and I kind already knew that.
Thanks anyway.
Google it. You will get your answers. Most pointing to the xda forums.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Cm9 is still being worked on. Chris41g is working on making it officially supported. His nightlies are so much better than alpha 6. I'd recommend upgrading to a nightly if you are on a6. Sbrissens jb aosp is also amazing as well. For me the jump from his alpha 4 to 5 was a huge difference in terms of battery life. I haven't had any los on it or any other problems on it. Recently on one of the alphas (idr which one, probably the latest) he added the status bar toggles so that was a huge plus as well. It still doesn't have the customization of cm10 but it's still amazing.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
cm10

Categories

Resources