Hey guys, if anyone has a Galaxy Nexus from Verizon could you possibly do a Quadrant Benchmark run (full benchmark) and post your results?
Also is it at stock or overclocked?
Thanks a bunch
Why do people still want quadrant? Its the most useless benchmark out right now, smart bench 2011 or GLBenchmark would be a better gauge of how the phone runs. I cant wait till future mark completes their benchmark app for android.
I would however love to see some smartbench scores for this phone.
Either way take a look at this
http://www.slashgear.com/galaxy-nexus-benchmarks-show-device-to-be-near-galaxy-s-ii-18196660/
SecrtAgentMan said:
Hey guys, if anyone has a Galaxy Nexus from Verizon could you possibly do a Quadrant Benchmark run (full benchmark) and post your results?
Also is it at stock or overclocked?
Thanks a bunch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can expect the same scores as the GSM version..
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Stock Nexus running v4.0.2
Quadrant score: 1st run - 1420, 2nd run - 1406
Not a good benchmark, like people have been saying.
If you "Force GPU Rendering" in the Development options, the first graphical part of Quadrant goes 50fps instead of 7 or 11, but the overall score was still 1480.
See attached pics for Smart Bench 2011 & AnTuTu results.
Related
Are we ever going to see quadrant scores like the hd2 is getting now ugh!!
A new rom has been imported to the hd2 that has it at 2800 quadrant score evo is better hardware and still at 1100-1500 whyyyy????
Sent From My HTC EVO4G
Lol.
What is the benchmark going to do for you?
garekinokami said:
What is the benchmark going to do for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what does it mean and why does it even exist?
Where can I download this at
If you really want it, you can get CM6.0 here:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/files/category/12-htc-evo/
and Snap 7.6 with Turbo here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=733099
The current Snap only works with CM6.0 though which is a few versions behind, so you might as well wait though.
So the kernel is not universally compatible???
poulosjr said:
So the kernel is not universally compatible???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he did clearly say that it was only compatible with cm 6.0
no it is not universally compatible
the benchmark doesn't do anything for you anyway
Quadrant scores are a joke and easily manipulated, just look at CM6 with Snap Turbo. 2800 was my highest quadrant on it and speed was identical to all other roms.
Benchmark..Schmenchmark.....
The reason were all here is to improve the performance and functionality of our devices isn't it?? These scores are posted by every reviewer, manufacturers are giving us more powerful processors with each new device. Kernels and overclock tools are a staple in the dev community. How are these benchmarks not important? Sure they may not reflect the overall performance of the device in every case but if everyone viewed benchmark scores as useless data where would we be?? Not here trying to improve on them
DirtyShroomz said:
Quadrant scores are a joke and easily manipulated, just look at CM6 with Snap Turbo. 2800 was my highest quadrant on it and speed was identical to all other roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. Even Cyanogen stated that the quadrant scores are fudged. I read his post somewhere, it had something to do with cheating on the I/O portion of the test.
My EVO with MIUI gets around 1750 and performs as good or better than when I was scoring 2600+ with cm6 and snap turbo.
My benchmark scores are horrible. My girlfriends mytouch 4g slide continually scores better. Just doesnt seem right for this flagship phone. Anybody else?
Benchmarks means nothing.
If you're using Quadrant Standard, you're basing it off a benchmark designed for single core CPUs and hasn't been updated for months. Not to mention, it is not optimized for ICS or multi-core CPUs.
jjzah said:
My benchmark scores are horrible. My girlfriends mytouch 4g slide continually scores better. Just doesnt seem right for this flagship phone. Anybody else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And which benchmark app is that?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Yes i was using quadrant. Thanks for the info!
jjzah said:
Yes i was using quadrant. Thanks for the info!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using,
https://market.android.com/details?...1bGwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5hbnR1dHUuQUJlbmNoTWFyayJd
https://market.android.com/details?...51bGwsMSwxLDEsImV1LmNoYWluZmlyZS5jZmJlbmNoIl0.
Those benchmarks are optimized for multi-core devices. Unsure about ICS but it should provide a better comparison. And benchmarks don't mean anything (once again!)
Not really sure why you thanked him because he didn't offer any credibility towards answering your question, but ok -_-
Hi,
What benchmarks?
In what conditions (i mean if you run benchs in charge+10 benchs the one after the other->overheating->thermal protection->decrease cpu freq->lowers score/very low RAM/rogue/etc...)?
Rom?
Kernel?
Scores (especially in what benchs)?
And the most important is that your phone works perfectly?
Indeed,the benchs are sometimes subjective...
I agree Quadrant is out of age
The must is Antutu (bench "multiple things"),Cf Bench also but sometimes very inaccurate...,only certain benchs testing the cpu,others only the gpu (fps 2d/3d for example)and the other yet another cpu + gpu...
Screenshot of your benchs?
Much more detail would be welcome
zephiK said:
Try using,
https://market.android.com/details?...1bGwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5hbnR1dHUuQUJlbmNoTWFyayJd
https://market.android.com/details?...51bGwsMSwxLDEsImV1LmNoYWluZmlyZS5jZmJlbmNoIl0.
Those benchmarks are optimized for multi-core devices. Unsure about ICS but it should provide a better comparison. And benchmarks don't mean anything (once again!)
Not really sure why you thanked him because he didn't offer any credibility towards answering your question, but ok -_-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe he discovered a different benchmark tool which favored him more after my comment
Thank you for compensation ;-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Hey guys I hear a lot of negative stuff about how smooth the GN isn't and how the hardware is not that good but I must say that after 6 months of SGS2 use with many awesome roms like Checkrom etc and overclocking to 1600Mhz running a lot of benchmark tests I have to say that my experience with the GN has been awesome. Its smooth, fast and pretty.
But I saved all my Antutu, Nenamark and Quadrant scores and i have done a series of scores with the GN trying different roms and kernels and I say that the results, even only clocked to 1350Mhz were on average above my old SGS2. We should consider how much more effort is required to use the resolution of the screen to produce 6800 scores on Antutu and 3000+ scores on Quadrant.
This phone is really the next logical step and I actually get it why Google went down this path.
robt772000 said:
Hey guys I hear a lot of negative stuff about how smooth the GN isn't and how the hardware is not that good but I must say that after 6 months of SGS2 use with many awesome roms like Checkrom etc and overclocking to 1600Mhz running a lot of benchmark tests I have to say that my experience with the GN has been awesome. Its smooth, fast and pretty.
But I saved all my Antutu, Nenamark and Quadrant scores and i have done a series of scores with the GN trying different roms and kernels and I say that the results, even only clocked to 1350Mhz were on average above my old SGS2. We should consider how much more effort is required to use the resolution of the screen to produce 6800 scores on Antutu and 3000+ scores on Quadrant.
This phone is really the next logical step and I actually get it why Google went down this path.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice to see a positive post for once.
Sweet as mate
I started a benchmark scores thread in general.
If you dont mind, can you post your ROM + Kernel and any OC/UV settings u applied.
Also, have u used CF-Bench and what was your score?
Cheers. Its big ie oc to 1350Mhz with Franco kernal.
Okay, so the other day, i ran quadrant on my gs2 against my brohters gs4g and i got 3259 and my brother got 938. I tried again today, and i got 1208 and the gs4g got 1190. i ran the test seversl times and the same result, nothing more than 1300. I didn't change anything from the first time i ran the test, so is my phone messed up? I know most people don't really like quadrant, but i use it because it kind of gives me peace of mind knowing my phone is better thssn everyone else's
Don't worry about it. It really doesnt matter.
Sent From The Best Phone of 2011
Reboot your phone then wait for about 30 seconds while everything settles (dont run any other apps) then run quadrant. What score did you get this time?
I tried the reboot thing after the first low score and pretty much the same score
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
kkg720 said:
I tried the reboot thing after the first low score and pretty much the same score
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would just throw it out the window bro.......thats too low to be in hand.
KillaHurtz said:
I would just throw it out the window bro.......thats too low to be in hand.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hilarious man
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
kkg720 said:
Okay, so the other day, i ran quadrant on my gs2 against my brohters gs4g and i got 3259 and my brother got 938. I tried again today, and i got 1208 and the gs4g got 1190. i ran the test seversl times and the same result, nothing more than 1300. I didn't change anything from the first time i ran the test, so is my phone messed up? I know most people don't really like quadrant, but i use it because it kind of gives me peace of mind knowing my phone is better thssn everyone else's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant doesnt go well with Dual Core Snapdragon Processors. I've been getting 2000 each time a ran it. Try ANTUTU Benchmark and see what you get.
Quandrant doesnt define a phone of how great your phone is.
Or CF bench works well!
SGSII T989~ juggernaut v4.1~synergy v0.10
Quadrant is a horribly outdated benchmark, don't rely on it ever.
-Sent from my Droid 2-
iExpliziT said:
Quadrant doesnt go well with Dual Core Snapdragon Processors. I've been getting 2000 each time a ran it. Try ANTUTU Benchmark and see what you get.
Quandrant doesnt define a phone of how great your phone is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll take what AnTuTu Benchmark gave me.. Listed me at 6327... Just over the Nexus ;-)
Main thing that brought me down as my stupid SD card because I have some generic piece of junk --- EDIT: Just ran it against the internal SD, and I got 6577. Even above the Galaxy Note ;-)
I know that quadrant is not optimized for dual core, but that doesnt explain why i was getting 3000+ and it just dropped to less than 1000
Btw antutu was 6492 idk if thats good or bad so...
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Freeze Google maps with titanium back up and see what u get ...
Sent from my EVO 3D Running Ganii's ICS
maek_it_happen said:
Freeze Google maps with titanium back up and see what u get ...
Sent from my EVO 3D Running Ganii's ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maps is really that big of a culprit?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
These threads get so old. Does everything work on your phone? Is it smooth and responsive? Then who cares what some outdated benchmark says. You are the benchmark.
I changed the rom on my friend's mytouch 4g and he scored 3246 on miui oc to 1.6 ghz lagfree, It beat my gs2 running zombie oc to 1.72 ghz lagfree 2976 i dont think quadrant is an accurate benchmark at all, so markus is right, YOU are the benchmark.
i have a galaxy s3.. when i run benchmark on antutu the score was 6503
and when i compare my phone to other on the ranking list and alot of people in the same phone got really high score
at 1st i thought they do overclock or use different ROMS, but when i do that it still the same
I WONDER HOW THEY DO THAT ??
is there any guide show me how to do it ??