[Q] MS2Ginger low quadrant score - Defy General

Hi to all. I cant understand why with cm7 i got 2300pts and now with ms2ginger 1.0 i have just 1300. It is so huge difference and i want to know how much u can score with this rom... I like it because of 720p recording and i don't want to use miui or cm7 till they will have it too... :/

Quadrant isnt very reliable with roms like cm7 where they use a lot of optimization tweaks and JIT. Even though cm7 is faster than most roms it certainly isnt twice as fast like quadrant indicates. Please dont go by a single benchmark score

Yea i know, but it is still amazing how CM7 is optimized just to show good score at quadrant... So sad...

Related

[Q] DHD Smartbench 2010 score

Hello Guys,
I decided to try out a new benchmark called Smartbench 2010. However when i run it, it gives me pretty low scores - about 800/1100 which i find kinda funny cos for example G2 has 1100/1400. So i was wondering if anybody tried this app already on the DHD and what are the results. The system runs smooth so it is not a real issue, but im curious....
I got 900/1300
Stock ROM. Not rooted.
I was about to create the same thread until I found this one. I have a rooted DHD using custom rom: ARHD 2.0.14, OC 1,2ghz. These are my scores:
410/692
Tried with USB-debugging mode ON: 781/1151.
Could someone with knowledge let us know why we get low scores? The phone itself runs smoothly as mentioned in first post.
I would like to know this too.
I got 983/1434
Stock ROM
i got 1500/1941 got 1577/2251 at 1.51 ghz on cm7
Bumb
Anymore news on this?
I am also interested why the DHD gets such a low score compared to a G2, or the myTouch 4G which scores even higher and has the same chipset as our phone.
Probably only software issues, right?
Sorry for waking up an old topic.
1129/1620 on CM7 Nightly #31, 1.2GHz
Could be better huh
will post mine after i install CoreDroid HD GB 2.3.3 V4.8
i got 1113/1135
Stock Unlocked,Unbranded DHD
I tried several builds of CoreDroid, which had different drivers and kernels and the score is still quite low, as well as on the stock ROM... It would be great if anyone would post gingerbread scores even if its still leak...
just ran benchmark 2011 with coredroid 5.0 gingerbread rom got 955/1195 not to bad on standard kernal
i got 1453/1643 on 1.5ghz CM7 build #31
So we have results from 600 - 1500 . This means this benchmark is rubbish and tells us close to nothing about anything...
Get over it guys
^^ agreed!

[Q] Custom ROMS & Quadrant

Hey guys,
I've had my Desire rooted for about 2 months now, and I've tried many different ROMs. At first, as I'm sure many of you did, I installed Cyanogenmod, but I didn't like the simplistic interface. Then I decided to install experimental stuff, like the Gingerbread ones, but I soon found out that they were still too laggy and buggy to be considered as a standard ROM.
Now, I've decided to re-install Cyanogenmod 6.1.1 because people love it and it's super fast. The problem is that I don't see the speed that everyone's talking about! My Quadrant score is lower than the Nexus 2.2 score and I cannot understand why. I even installed DeFroST but the results are still the same. The phone is too laggy, much slower than the Stock ROM with HTC Sense (which was pretty damn fast in my opinion). Does anyone knows why this happens? Does this have to do with the ext partition on my 16gb memory card or something?
Thanks in advance,
Louis.
Just how the rom is built. To be honest, anything above the score or 1100 we won't really notice much difference at all. When I've used it, I really tested the balls off it and my CPU score was making the difference. There are subtle differences between roms but we can't notice it so it doesn't matter. Anyway, benchmarks arn't really reliable, just a rough estimate.
I've installed my first ROM even some days ago and I'm getting 1160 on Leedroid 2.3d with a class 4 sd card. Speed is noticeably faster compared to the stock rom, it really is.
Maybe you could try another sd card ?
Don't know if it could help, I'm all new into this too.
hxxp://farm6.static.flickr.com/5299/5470848275_17738284e7.jpg
Do you fell laggy or slow? Quadrant doesn't show useful statistics... IMO Cyanogen is fast enough. But, if you want you can try MIUI, especially this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=957291
It is really fast and battery saving
P.S.
If you want useful statistics use SmartBench from market, I have 877 and 1114.
SmartBench is better.
And for quadrant:
I have used a ROM which gave me extremly high scores (2200+), but in real life it was laggy and slow.
Now using a ROM which is around 1700, but is super-fast and no lags at all.
The problem is it does feel laggy and it's not a placebo effect because I didn't do the test and then thought that it felt laggy; it felt laggy so I ran the test for confirmation. Froyo 2.2 with Sense was much, much, much faster than a Vanilla CyanogenMod, and even though I never ran Quadrant on it I remember that it was much faster. That is simply not right. Maybe it takes some time for the ROM to "settle" or something?

wich rom has the highest quadrant score?

like title says, does anyone have multiple pics of quadrant scores from roms, custom and stock with custom kernel??
I want to know wich ones are fast, stable, and able for dayly use without minor bugs
Bro the quadrant score doesn't help you. I have 2600 with 940 MHz but games were laggy (CM7.2), that's why i came back to stock.
I believe this benchmarks are just bulls**ts.
Now im on stock 2.3.3 (which came with the phone first time, original one for my country) and lol, it's fast, smooth and better than other stock roms/custom roms.
As LegoGabi said. A higher quadrant score doesn't mean better performance in games.
I've tried these:
CM 7.1
CM 7.2
CM 9
in which CM 7.2 (with the latest patch) is the most stable.
Great rom for daily use.
I think it's CM7.2
im using CM7.2 and score is 2000++ in quadrant advance
i think the CM7.2 with patch4 is the more fast and stable for dialy use
With Cyanogen mod 4 noobs I got about 2k without overclock And it was like 2.5k with overclok to 900+
For me, it's CM 7.2 with 2000+ pts, as well. Although, you cannot use the "performance" governor all the time.

normal performance

I recently went back to sense after having been on Absolution for a while now. Absolution was great and all games including temple run played flawlessly. Now with the new ROM ( latest Coredroid V9.4) im starting to notice lag even after OC to 1.3 GHz. Benchmark tests are horrible compared to Absolution. Highest Nenamark 2 is 10 compared to 15 regularly on absolution. Highest quadrant is 19000 something compared to regular 2300 on absolution. Is this the regular sense ROMs performance or can I get a bit more by tweaking more or changing ROMs/ Kernels?
ive tried many kernels btw ... ended up with LorDmod NCT- 4.0 BFS
Try changing the CPU governor to interactive.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA
ive tried lagfree, smartass, on demand, and interactive ... they all seem to give almost the same result :S So I take it Temple Run should run smoothly even on sense?
I guess it should... Change the ROM...
I have notice that when i have gone back to a sence rom it always seems slower!
Change your rom to CyanogenMod 7.1. That is the smoothest rom while I'm playing
imho, the only sense upperhand vs other launchers and the scrolling/flipping and animation speed. Pretty much undeniable that Sense scrolls really fast and animates/trans really fast. However, if you would take a look at the amount of memory SENSE is using... I can't say for sure, but i believe sense bogs down the general performance of the driod by favouring its Homescreen performance. Correct me if im wrong.
Hevlaska said:
imho, the only sense upperhand vs other launchers and the scrolling/flipping and animation speed. Pretty much undeniable that Sense scrolls really fast and animates/trans really fast. However, if you would take a look at the amount of memory SENSE is using... I can't say for sure, but i believe sense bogs down the general performance of the driod by favouring its Homescreen performance. Correct me if im wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed. .. performance wise its the worst but esthetically its the nicest launcher out there. .. would be great if you can keep those elements in a rom and get rod of all other bloatware that hogs memory or slows the system down. .. would make for the best rom ever
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA
actually, there are many chiefs successfully "cleaned" up sense and did a pretty good job. Then again, i've always prefer lighter roms... well, each to his own.

Defy HD Gaming

Hello guys!
I just recently bought a Defy, I'm very pleased with it,
but theres something's that driving me crazy,
Searching on this forum, most people claim that they get the best gaming performance with CM9.
I have tried about 5 different roms so far, Miui, Cm7, Cm9 and Cm10 -> with and without Chainfire, with and without chainfire plugins, with and without overclocking, froyo and gb kernal.
so far Chainfire only vastly degraded my performance, probably because it enabled HD graphics, my best benchmarks are without it.
Cm7 i am getting 40 FPS on neocore and ~2000 on Quadrent.
Cm9 getting only 28-35 fps on neocore (Tried only Epsylon builds so far).
Miui GB getting 36-38 fps.
Realworld I am using Nova 3 to see if it is smooth or not.
So, why are people saying they get the best performance with CM9? What am I missing here?
Thanks in advance!!
Sorry for the bump, but over 300 views and no one has an answer????

Categories

Resources