Develop Bugs

Steinheil Screen Protectors Finally Here!!

The Steinheil screen protectors for the Evo are now available. From what it looks like they have a new ultra line. Read nothing but good reveiws on Steinheil cant wait to try these out.
SGP STEINHEIL "ULTRA" CRYSTAL Screen Protector for HTC Evo 4G - $13.99
sgpstore(DOT)com/product_info.php/cPath/23_33/products_id/1462
SGP Steinheil Anti-Fingerprint Screen Protector for HTC Evo 4G - $11.99
sgpstore(DOT)com/product_info.php/cPath/23_33/products_id/1463
Replace (dot) with an actual (.)

SGP STEINHEIL "ULTRA" CRYSTAL Screen Protector for HTC Evo 4G - $13.99
http://sgpstore.com/product_info.php/cPath/23_33/products_id/1462
SGP Steinheil Anti-Fingerprint Screen Protector for HTC Evo 4G - $11.99
http://sgpstore.com/product_info.php/cPath/23_33/products_id/1463
For the lazy who don't want to type/copy the url into their address bar. Heh.
EDIT: Oh hey, the company is based a less then a mile from here.... Maybe I should go look.
EDIT 2: The company is based in an office building right across my favorite tofu house!

Whats the difference between these and Zagg?
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

lllDreadChiclll said:
Whats the difference between these and Zagg?
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sgp crystal = close to glass feel
zagg = rubbery feel

I ordered the anti-fingerprint... should be here in a day or so.. cant wait cause i dont like the feel of the zagg at all!

Let us know how they are.
Especially the anti-fingerprint..
My two biggest probs with this phone are
A. oil
B. not as smooth as an oleophobic coated equivalent. (AKA oil again)

in for the reviews...

Incredible... They are out of stock. FAIL

be happy you didn't get one. i got my anti fingerprint today and there are no holes cut out on it for the front facing camera. their design is wrong its probably the same as the HD2.

Just ordered the anti-fingerprint.
I've been using the crappy one from sprint, and it already has marks on it that won't come off.
I used to use powersupport crystal film on an iphone, and it felt like glass and lasted forever without getting any marks/dings/scratches on it, so I'll see how this compares.

knives of ice said:
be happy you didn't get one. i got my anti fingerprint today and there are no holes cut out on it for the front facing camera. their design is wrong its probably the same as the HD2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should post a review on their website

monkeefied said:
you should post a review on their website
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many of the protectors on the market don't have cutouts for anything but the speaker - this is not that unusual or "wrong"...

I have pretty much settled on boxwave as my sole provider of screen protectors for various devices after having tried many. They have the best custom fit (all holes cut out) screen protectors in my experience. I actually do not use the clear one, just the anti-fingerprint one.
For cases, I pretty much go exclusively with Seidio now too.

knives of ice said:
be happy you didn't get one. i got my anti fingerprint today and there are no holes cut out on it for the front facing camera. their design is wrong its probably the same as the HD2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You posted the same thing here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=709047
its not wrong... like someone else said.. i am not sure i have heard of ANY screen protector that has cutouts on the front for the camera or light sensor. Like i said in the other post, these are "99.9% optically clear" and they should not interfere with anything.

Well.. i got my Steinheil anti-fingerprint the other day and i am shipping it back today.
What i liked: The fit / cut was great! Didnt interfere with the camera and was perfect. I really like the material its made of (not stretchy spongy like Zagg) very hard and felt good on the screen. And the aheisive they used was really awesome! While putting it on, its very easy to take off and move so you make sure you have it in the right spot, but after its on, it stays in place well!
What i didnt like: Really the only thing i didnt like was the matte finish on the anti-fingerprint ones. It felt nice and was great to the touch. My finger glided very smooth over the surface, however, it seemed to give the screen a grainy look and with this beautiful screen on the Evo, you just cant have that.
I would absoulutely buy from them again if they had the clear in stock or could tell me when they would have more in stock. But they cant, so i am returning it and think i will try the handhelditems ones just to see if there is a quality difference in the "value" priced ones VS. the "premium" ones (my guess is there wont be)

zagg has cutouts for both. it's the only one i have delt with.
frettfreak said:
You posted the same thing here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=709047
its not wrong... like someone else said.. i am not sure i have heard of ANY screen protector that has cutouts on the front for the camera or light sensor. Like i said in the other post, these are "99.9% optically clear" and they should not interfere with anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

frettfreak said:
Well.. i got my Steinheil anti-fingerprint the other day and i am shipping it back today.
What i liked: The fit / cut was great! Didnt interfere with the camera and was perfect. I really like the material its made of (not stretchy spongy like Zagg) very hard and felt good on the screen. And the aheisive they used was really awesome! While putting it on, its very easy to take off and move so you make sure you have it in the right spot, but after its on, it stays in place well!
What i didnt like: Really the only thing i didnt like was the matte finish on the anti-fingerprint ones. It felt nice and was great to the touch. My finger glided very smooth over the surface, however, it seemed to give the screen a grainy look and with this beautiful screen on the Evo, you just cant have that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just got mine last night. I have the same opinion of it. However, I applied mine anyway because I had the crappy universal Sprint one on there and they only cut a square to match the 4.3" display instead of all of the glass.
I ordered a crystal one also last night...I'm impressed with the anti-fingerprint one, but like you said, the matte/grainy finish is just a no-go on such a nice display.

Boxwave has these cutouts. I have and always will be a Boxwaver....
frettfreak said:
its not wrong... like someone else said.. i am not sure i have heard of ANY screen protector that has cutouts on the front for the camera or light sensor. Like i said in the other post, these are "99.9% optically clear" and they should not interfere with anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sent via Tapatalk

Boxwave boxwave boxwave. All the correct cutouts and perfect feel and look.

I received the Steinheil Ultra Crystal Clear protectors in the mail today. I like the feel of it-no rubbery feel at all. The installation is a dry method and very easy to apply and walk away with a perfect looking screen. There is no wait time like with some other brands out there where you need to use liquid for the installation. On the EVO I've tried Ghost Armor, Phantom Skinz, and ExtremeShields and now Steinheil. Steinheil by far is my preference though wish the protectors were cut to the actual size of the screen not smaller than it. I'd much rather have a more difficult installation with 100% of the screen covered than an easier one with portions of it unprotected. Of all the protectors I've tried cut wise-Phantom Skinz covered the most screen of all them.

Steinheil Ultra Fine

Does anyone have this. I am currently looking to get a better screen protector than the one that I got from verizon and this looks like a good option.
So does anyone have any experience with this type of screen protector and any pros and cons about it?

Assuming you're getting this for anti-fingerprint purposes, the SGP Ultra fine will do you wonders. It does prevent fingerprints from getting on to the screen. However, it slightly compromises the display a little. You will see little artifacts from the light of the display going through the screen protector, since there are layers in there used for the anti-fingerprint.
Don't get this if you want ultra clear display, or if you don't care much about having fingerprints. If you want ultra clear, try their Ultra Crystal Clear.

I've been using it so far for about 2 weeks.. Amazing for anti-fingerprint purposes..
One of the best screen protectors I have ever had..
Definitely recommended..

I've had the ultra fine for about a week and so far it's great. The clarity of the screen is definitely compromised, but you don't notice it after a bit. One of the best things is your fingers don't drag/catch like they can on naked glass or crystal style protectors. It just sort of glides across the surface.

what do you guys think about the anti-glare on this screen protector?

I have ultra fine and i like it, but there is alot of glare outdoors, but it does its job, i see no fingerprints on the screen.
as Purgatoiry said you definitely slide across the screen with this screen guard.

Varelse said:
I have ultra fine and i like it, but there is alot of glare outdoors, but it does its job, i see no fingerprints on the screen.
as Purgatoiry said you definitely slide across the screen with this screen guard.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
huh, it is supposed to be anti glare...

Dunno what to say, because of the matte finish, when the sun is on it its hard to see.
just my 2c of course, and even with the glare, i still wont use any other screen protector.

Wouldn't use anything besides a Steinheil.

Varelse said:
Dunno what to say, because of the matte finish, when the sun is on it its hard to see.
just my 2c of course, and even with the glare, i still wont use any other screen protector.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had one of the earlier anti-fingerprint protectors on my incredible and I noticed the same thing. I think the problem is that the sunlight gets diffused in the screen which makes it hard to see through the glare.

Is the Crystal Clear smooth like the anti print one?

D3TH METAL said:
Is the Crystal Clear smooth like the anti print one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Crystal Clear is like glass. It's probably the best option if you want to protect your screen but want to make it feel like nothing is there. I have one on mine and people, who play with my phone, don't realize there's a protector on it until they see the seam for the protector.

Video Review: SGP Ultra Oleophobic Screenshield

Hey guys,
Got my hands on the SGP Ultra Oleophobic screenshield from SGP, which they make for a variety of different devices. This is an oil resistant screenshield, which unlike the Ultra Optics, does not affect screen quality at all, but isn't as resistant from fingerprints / glare as the Optics. Overall I'm really pleased with the final product, you can find the full review below:

Yep i have this on my phone too and it is very good, ive never had any problems.

jonny68 said:
Yep i have this on my phone too and it is very good, ive never had any problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how long are you using it now?

How does this compare to the crystal version?
Also would this or the optic (anti finger) be better? For both clarity and finger prints

Intercrew said:
How does this compare to the crystal version?
Also would this or the optic (anti finger) be better? For both clarity and finger prints
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The crystal version has a more similar feeling to the naked glass, whereas this one is smoother, which some may or may not be a good thing.
Crystal version is for someone who wants to protect their screen without affecting quality or texture, but you'll still get fingerprints.
I still prefer the Optics since it helps with glare as well.
Better for clarity: oleophobic
Better against fingerprints: optics
Hope I helped!

Ploone said:
The crystal version has a more similar feeling to the naked glass, whereas this one is smoother, which some may or may not be a good thing.
Crystal version is for someone who wants to protect their screen without affecting quality or texture, but you'll still get fingerprints.
I still prefer the Optics since it helps with glare as well.
Better for clarity: oleophobic
Better against fingerprints: optics
Hope I helped!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but if you compare clarity from optics to oleophobic how bad is the optics? I don't mind fingerprints but having to constantly wipe and having the edges of the screen build up dirt/oil/prints is really ugly to clean. I'm sure it'll ruin the rubber/silicon case that I'll be using (sgp neo hybrid or ex).

Intercrew said:
Thanks, but if you compare clarity from optics to oleophobic how bad is the optics? I don't mind fingerprints but having to constantly wipe and having the edges of the screen build up dirt/oil/prints is really ugly to clean. I'm sure it'll ruin the rubber/silicon case that I'll be using (sgp neo hybrid or ex).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The oleophobic is close to 100% clarity for me, really hard to tell if it affects quality whatsoever, seems to be super clear.
The ultra optics is probably 90% clear, you can definitely tell there is something on it but viewing the screen is fine, not uncomfortable.
Like I said before, I'd still choose the ultra optics over anything else because of the benefits against fingerprints and dirt, I can live with a little screen degradation.

manmad said:
how long are you using it now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since July, you would hardly even notice you had a screen protector on either, well worth the money.

jonny68 said:
Since July, you would hardly even notice you had a screen protector on either, well worth the money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely agree. Although I prefer the Ultra optics, the Oleophobic is still a great option.

I have the Ultra oleophobic and it was great at first but after a couple months, i start to see a lot of smudges, fingerprints and oil on the screen. So it's not really holding it up for me.
Now I'm just looking at the other ones.. What's the difference really between Ultra Optics and Ultra Fine? I'm looking for one that is good or at least decent on fingerprints and the best clarity. Which one is better? It just makes it seem confusing since both are matte style with antiglare/anti-fingerprint properties but they are two different products!

Tri3Dent said:
I have the Ultra oleophobic and it was great at first but after a couple months, i start to see a lot of smudges, fingerprints and oil on the screen. So it's not really holding it up for me.
Now I'm just looking at the other ones.. What's the difference really between Ultra Optics and Ultra Fine? I'm looking for one that is good or at least decent on fingerprints and the best clarity. Which one is better? It just makes it seem confusing since both are matte style with antiglare/anti-fingerprint properties but they are two different products!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Ultra Fine is what is known as a classic anti-fingerprint protector, it severely affects screen quality but does the best job at preventing smudges and glare.
The Ultra optics has better screen clarity, so there is not as much loss of quality, and while it does a good job at preventing smudges, it is not as good as the Ultra Fine.

Re: The Crystal version as mentioned earlier in the thread; I couldn't get rid of it fast enough, it seemed to magnify fingerprints. That said, when it was clean and untouched it was "invisible". Touch sensitivity was affected as well, not as good as no protector obviously, but paled in comparison to the Ultra Optics which was unexpected.

mudferret said:
Re: The Crystal version as mentioned earlier in the thread; I couldn't get rid of it fast enough, it seemed to magnify fingerprints. That said, when it was clean and untouched it was "invisible". Touch sensitivity was affected as well, not as good as no protector obviously, but paled in comparison to the Ultra Optics which was unexpected.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried an Ultra Crystal in over a year now, back on the iPhone - I too was disappointed that the fingerprints were so noticeable.

SGP Steinheil Ultra crystal VS Flex HD

Which one of them should I buy?
Thanks

i hate liquid application screen protectors; rainbow effects

They have a comparison chart in the product page.
http://www.spigen.com/cell-phone/sa...3-screen-protector-steinheil-flex-series.html

twoashj said:
They have a comparison chart in the product page.
http://www.spigen.com/cell-phone/sa...3-screen-protector-steinheil-flex-series.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes....like a boss

Does that mean the Flex will feel like a Skinomi? I love their Carbon Fiber series but never liked their screen protectors.

avetny said:
yes....like a boss
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha sorry if you felt that way. I looked up wth FlexHD is, and sgp has that information on their product page so i just put a link. That way people can make their own decision depending on what they are looking for

RMXO said:
Does that mean the Flex will feel like a Skinomi? I love their Carbon Fiber series but never liked their screen protectors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same exact thing. i bought couple when skinomi did .95 cent sale on hox, now i know why

kyan~ said:
same exact thing. i bought couple when skinomi did .95 cent sale on hox, now i know why
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was hoping to hear that, Ultra Crystal it is for me

just received my s3 and installed the flex sgp. noticed it does not fully cover the screen on the side. there was enough gap to trap some dust and lint over time.
other than that, i dont see anything wrong with the flex.
should've went with ultra crystal since that's what I have on my S2 but I want to try something new

mick2021 said:
just received my s3 and installed the flex sgp. noticed it does not fully cover the screen on the side. there was enough gap to trap some dust and lint over time.
other than that, i dont see anything wrong with the flex.
should've went with ultra crystal since that's what I have on my S2 but I want to try something new
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you mind posting some pics of the Flex HD installed on the GS3? Really curious to see how it looks installed.

I have tried both.
-FlexHD-
Pros:
anti-glare
fingerprint proof
fits the screen perfectly
Cons:
my first batch has this very weird rainbow effect problem. currently waiting for my free replacement from SGP; their customer service is very good.
-Steinheil Crystal-
Pros:
as the name suggests, it's crystal clear
feels very high quality
Cons:
does not cover the whole screen; see photos:
http://i46.tinypic.com/2a4r2pk.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/2qbexwj.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/2vcaute.jpg
Overall, I prefer the FlexHD and that will probably be my final protector once I receive my replacement. Although I'd replace it with a Steinheil Oleophobic (when they come out) if it has that rainbow problem again.
If anyone has any comparison questions, feel free to ask me. I've tried FlexHD, Steinheil Crystal, and XtremeGuard. I'll probably try a Zagg before I put on a new FlexHD as well...

I'm not sure why you'd waste your money on Zagg. Honestly, those have got to be the worst, most lint happy, bumpy, overpriced films I've ever seen. Have you ever used a Zagg? I've had several kits on iDevices years back and they're great for the backs of iPods just for protection but SGP is leaps and bounds ahead of them IMO.

saltmine said:
I have tried both.
-FlexHD-
Pros:
anti-glare
fingerprint proof
fits the screen perfectly
Cons:
my first batch has this very weird rainbow effect problem. currently waiting for my free replacement from SGP; their customer service is very good.
-Steinheil Crystal-
Pros:
as the name suggests, it's crystal clear
feels very high quality
Cons:
does not cover the whole screen; see photos:
http://i46.tinypic.com/2a4r2pk.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/2qbexwj.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/2vcaute.jpg
Overall, I prefer the FlexHD and that will probably be my final protector once I receive my replacement. Although I'd replace it with a Steinheil Oleophobic (when they come out) if it has that rainbow problem again.
If anyone has any comparison questions, feel free to ask me. I've tried FlexHD, Steinheil Crystal, and XtremeGuard. I'll probably try a Zagg before I put on a new FlexHD as well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How the XtremeGuard compare to the FlexHD (worth the extra $15) ?
I'm very disappointed with SGP customer service, so I think I'll avoid their products in the future...

Anyone try this one?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/22104430124...acat=0&_nkw=221044301248&_rdc=1#ht_6066wt_802
The application video looks awesome.
J

saltmine said:
I have tried both.
-FlexHD-
Pros:
anti-glare
fingerprint proof
fits the screen perfectly
Cons:
my first batch has this very weird rainbow effect problem. currently waiting for my free replacement from SGP; their customer service is very good.
-Steinheil Crystal-
Pros:
as the name suggests, it's crystal clear
feels very high quality
Cons:
does not cover the whole screen; see photos:
http://i46.tinypic.com/2a4r2pk.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/2qbexwj.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/2vcaute.jpg
Overall, I prefer the FlexHD and that will probably be my final protector once I receive my replacement. Although I'd replace it with a Steinheil Oleophobic (when they come out) if it has that rainbow problem again.
If anyone has any comparison questions, feel free to ask me. I've tried FlexHD, Steinheil Crystal, and XtremeGuard. I'll probably try a Zagg before I put on a new FlexHD as well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im actually kind of liking that it doesn't cover all of the glass, it looks like the actual screen is covered which is the purpose of it right? and with it not covering the entire thing getting any bubbles out would be easy right?

Thanks for the pics on the Steinheil Crystal. compare to the flex, it's not that bad lol
after 8 hours, the bubbles disappear except for 2 I can still see but the rainbow is still there.
took the pics on the S2

wildting said:
Anyone try this one?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/22104430124...acat=0&_nkw=221044301248&_rdc=1#ht_6066wt_802
The application video looks awesome.
J
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sold!
I almost fell outta my chair when I watched the installation video.....my first concern was "how the hell they gonna show a screen protector install in 23 seconds???" The rest was history. Already placed my order, that's is a purely genius idea/technique they've got there. I don't really care that it doesn't reach the edges of the phone, my Otterbox will likely cover the area it doesn't so no worries.
Thanks for sharing that

@916x10
Please post pics and let us know about quality when you get it. I'm totally tempted but already received two Zagg Full Body and ordered the Ultra Crystal.
J
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium

wildting said:
@916x10
Please post pics and let us know about quality when you get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No doubt

saltmine said:
I have tried both.
-FlexHD-
Pros:
anti-glare
fingerprint proof
fits the screen perfectly
Cons:
my first batch has this very weird rainbow effect problem. currently waiting for my free replacement from SGP; their customer service is very good.
-Steinheil Crystal-
Pros:
as the name suggests, it's crystal clear
feels very high quality
Cons:
does not cover the whole screen; see photos:
http://i46.tinypic.com/2a4r2pk.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/2qbexwj.jpg
http://i50.tinypic.com/2vcaute.jpg
Overall, I prefer the FlexHD and that will probably be my final protector once I receive my replacement. Although I'd replace it with a Steinheil Oleophobic (when they come out) if it has that rainbow problem again.
If anyone has any comparison questions, feel free to ask me. I've tried FlexHD, Steinheil Crystal, and XtremeGuard. I'll probably try a Zagg before I put on a new FlexHD as well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't wait for the Oleo to come out, I always get that for all my phones.

Video Review: SGP/Spigen Curved Crystal Screenshield

Hey fellas,
Finally got my hands on the SGP Curved Crystal for the Galaxy S3. This is a full coverage screen protector similar to the Tridea True Shield, but I quickly realized this is a better product. Installation was very simple and the results are incredible! Fit and finish is fantastic, covering the whole display and only having cutouts for the speaker, home button and front facing camera. Clarity is great as well, although it shows a little fingerprinting on it. For my personal use, this is terrific and I highly recommend you watch the video below and see if it's a fit for you!
Check out the video below for all info;

Thank you for the excellent video.
What about the scratches ? Does it scratch like the SGP Ultra Nano Clear ?

So what is the right screen protector if you are using a TPU case?

liamR said:
Thank you for the excellent video.
What about the scratches ? Does it scratch like the SGP Ultra Nano Clear ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not as bad as it, no. They are mostly hairline scratches. Some users reported that theirs 'dented' if you pushed your nails into it too hard, although I haven't experienced that problem.

azsamsancho said:
So what is the right screen protector if you are using a TPU case?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll be fine with mostly ANY other screen protector, seeing as they aren't made for full coverage.

Great review, would you happen to know if the screen protector would have any problem with the SGP Neo Hybrid? I'm guessing it shouldn't since they're both SGP products. I'm looking for a screen that offers full screen protection so I might end up picking this up or the glas.t that they have up for sale.

TheInvisibleBoy said:
Great review, would you happen to know if the screen protector would have any problem with the SGP Neo Hybrid? I'm guessing it shouldn't since they're both SGP products. I'm looking for a screen that offers full screen protection so I might end up picking this up or the glas.t that they have up for sale.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope - it works perfect! As a matter of fact, I'm using that combo right now.

Dents?
I'm wondering how it will hold up a few days from now, please keep us updated! The denting problem seems pretty common, though.

babydo said:
I'm wondering how it will hold up a few days from now, please keep us updated! The denting problem seems pretty common, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had the shield on for 10 days or so and I haven't experienced a wide-spread issue with the denting, this may be just because my nails are cut very short. However, when I read the issues some were having, I decided to purposely try and dent the screenshield and see if any blemishes would be permanent or if they would disappear. Most screen protectors have self-healing properties and this one did the same for the forced dents I created. Seems any permanent dents would come from applying extreme pressure to the shield.

Would an Otterbox work or is it like a TPU case and cause peeling?