Jailbreak exploits - Bada Software and Hacking General

Are there any exploits that have been found in addition to spoofing that allow unsigned apps to be executed?

look at this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1193694
wac apps can be run, but i still dont know what these are able to

Anything else?

I am bumping this thread.

I don't think that you will get something
bada is still new and its hackers (excuse me for saying this) are still inexperienced or just lazy
Unlike IOS which gets its jailbreak after the release of its new version by 3-4 days
Also the developers hate sp**fing or jailbreaking
So bada is not the right platform to jailbreak
Best Regards

Why do they hate jailbreaking?

Because if bada is jailbreaked they won't sell their apps
Most of bada app developers are free lances
Let's hope that will change with bada 2.0
Best Regards

When I say jailbreak, I mean being able to run unsigned apps, not pirated apps.

in fact it means the same...

Same action, different purpose.

Does spoofing still work?

With lastest official firmwares (KF3, JL2) spoofing doesn't work now.

Thank you.
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using XDA App

Related

[Q] WP 7 Rooting or Jailbreaking?

Hey!
So I want to buy the HTC Mozart, but I am not quite sure, because if there is no good community it wont be worth the money. So does anyone know if somebody is working on a root or jailbreak for wp7?
It would make the platform even greater
Thanks in advance!
People are working on it. I'd be surprised if there isn't a jailbreak available in 3 months after it is released.
Ok thanks I am just interested as the beta was already available and the roms have leaked in the htc Mozart category.
To general!
~~Tito~~
the windows mobile community is the reason this message board exists. I wouldn't worry.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
Made2Last said:
the windows mobile community is the reason this message board exists. I wouldn't worry.
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ^
Also, XDA calls "root or jailbreak" for WM "HardSPL"
ericc191 said:
This ^
Also, XDA calls "root or jailbreak" for WM "HardSPL"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"HardSPL" is a bootloader that allows custom Windows ROMs - like flashing to BIOS in your PC to a 3rd party version
Windows doesn't have the concept of a "root or jailbreak" because there is no root account or Jail Shell.
ericc191 said:
This ^
Also, XDA calls "root or jailbreak" for WM "HardSPL"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WM (Windows Mobile) is not equivalent to WP or (Windows Phone) Windows Mobile is the past, Windows Phone is Microsoft moving forward. I think they might actually have something with this new OS
Mhh interesting Thanks!
I tested the OS and it feels great, like my iphone 2g at first and after JB i noticed that it is crap without JB XD so just wondering ^^
~~Tito~~ said:
To general!
~~Tito~~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again To general.
This just discusses WP7, it does not contribute anything developmental wise, just discussion wise .
~~Tito~~
I don't see much of a point in jailbreaking, because there's absolutely squat in regards to API documentation of Iris UIX. No one will be able to write up alternates to the system components.
The only thing that'll make sense right now is unbrand phones, to get carriers out of the loop in regards of updates.
Some of these people think wp7 is ios with a new skin. Let them keep asking about this, Lol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
N8ter said:
Some of these people think wp7 is ios with a new skin. Let them keep asking about this, Lol.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not think that this is IOS with a skin!!
I just wanted to know if something like jb or root will come!
Not JB per se but only the concept of being able to do stuff MS doesnt want to!
@Tom Servo
I am not sure but isnt it running on a silverlight platform so it would be rather easy to develop different apps?
A large part of the base system, especially UI, is .NET code but uses a different framework called Iris UIX. It's a descendant of the MCE graphics framework, and also used in the Zune desktop software.
Third party applications are forced to use Silverlight instead.
That's also why there's a disconnect between UI features and performance between the first party and third party apps.
Tom Servo said:
A large part of the base system, especially UI, is .NET code but uses a different framework called Iris UIX. It's a descendant of the MCE graphics framework, and also used in the Zune desktop software.
Third party applications are forced to use Silverlight instead.
That's also why there's a disconnect between UI features and performance between the first party and third party apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok thanks!
Now thats kinda stupid from them.....
A long time ago, they hired more developers to work on UIX. Seems like they were more occupied porting it to mobile devices than documenting it and prepping it for general release, or something.
I still hope that it'll be made public at some point in time. It seems to be a way better solution than WPF, judging both the phones and the Zune software, even tho the majority of it is still .NET. Maybe a little less flexible, tho. Seems like some teams over at Microsoft went like "**** it, this is overengineered slow crap" and continued to work on MCML, which turned into UIX.
WPF was on the table long before the flashy Zune client ever came to be, which is also mostly .NET. That tells you something.
Tom Servo said:
I don't see much of a point in jailbreaking, because there's absolutely squat in regards to API documentation of Iris UIX. No one will be able to write up alternates to the system components.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about enabling PInvoke, getting the same access to native WinCE APIs OEMs have? Getting access to filesystem, sideloading, tethering, you name it.
Tom Servo said:
A long time ago, they hired more developers to work on UIX. Seems like they were more occupied porting it to mobile devices than documenting it and prepping it for general release, or something.
I still hope that it'll be made public at some point in time. It seems to be a way better solution than WPF, judging both the phones and the Zune software, even tho the majority of it is still .NET. Maybe a little less flexible, tho. Seems like some teams over at Microsoft went like "**** it, this is overengineered slow crap" and continued to work on MCML, which turned into UIX.
WPF was on the table long before the flashy Zune client ever came to be, which is also mostly .NET. That tells you something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot! I just saw the app you created looks interessting
Is it in the market yet?
So as you develop such apps i have to ask you:
Do you think the problems you mentioned can be overcome like MS says.
Like in one or two months?
Or would you say that the market will not evolve as much as apple and android?
vangrieg said:
How about enabling PInvoke, getting the same access to native WinCE APIs OEMs have? Getting access to filesystem, sideloading, tethering, you name it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My reason exactly!
vangrieg said:
How about enabling PInvoke, getting the same access to native WinCE APIs OEMs have? Getting access to filesystem, sideloading, tethering, you name it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Microsoft doesnt allow native code for 3rd parties, amd pretty much said they'll keep it that way. I doubt WP7 will support unsafe code for 3rd parties. It's too obvious a workaround...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Why is it taking so long for WP7 to be fully "cracked" open?

I am not talking about sideloading. Android and iOS are hacked within weeks if not days of being released. WP7 has been out for a while and it seems there hasn't been any major progress in this front.
Anyone know why this is? Has MS made WP7 THAT secure that even xda can't break into it?
digger1985 said:
I am not talking about sideloading. Android and iOS are hacked within weeks if not days of being released. WP7 has been out for a while and it seems there hasn't been any major progress in this front.
Anyone know why this is? Has MS made WP7 THAT secure that even xda can't break into it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're not talking about sideloading, what are you talking about? The primary modes of "hacking" iOS and Android involve sideloading homebrew apps that do different stuff, which is already happening on WP7.
I was mostly talking about system modifications. Where are utilities like quick toggles for the settings and such? Or for example having folders in the app list. These were added pretty quickly when iOS was jailbroken I believe.
digger1985 said:
I was mostly talking about system modifications. Where are utilities like quick toggles for the settings and such? Or for example having folders in the app list. These were added pretty quickly when iOS was jailbroken I believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awaiting the proper APIs
Hmm... I was under the impression that the APIs were there but just not available to the devs. Cracking open WP7 was meant to solve this right?
digger1985 said:
Hmm... I was under the impression that the APIs were there but just not available to the devs. Cracking open WP7 was meant to solve this right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. Devs have no access to native APIs and the access they have managed to gain is still sandboxed to restrict what they can do with the phone.
You could still crack open WP7 without access to native APIs, but it makes it more unlikely that anybody will. When devs have access to native APIs, there is more of a chance that somebody has overlooked a method of gaining access to the phone's features.
I'm not 100%, but I'm pretty sure iPhone did not have a native API available when it was jailbroken. Android is mostly open source, so it's pretty much already jailbroken
Just to mention, i was today able to get full root control of running processes on the current phone (phone sided code). And some api's that are hidden by microsoft can easily be reloaded with "LoadLibrary" and "GetProcAddress" like enumerate running processes. (Look under wp7>hacking>dllimport).
its coming...very soon
Why is it taking so long for WP7 to be fully "cracked" open?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Microsoft developers are not amatuers, and TBQH I hope it never is. They need to shut down homebrew IMO, or certainly not facilitate it. All it does it lead to issues and I don't think Microsoft wants the solution to issues to be "go to XDA" or "flash CustomROM_01."
Android is a mess because of all that ****.
How long it took for the first iPhone JB?
fiinix said:
Just to mention, i was today able to get full root control of running processes on the current phone (phone sided code). And some api's that are hidden by microsoft can easily be reloaded with "LoadLibrary" and "GetProcAddress" like enumerate running processes. (Look under wp7>hacking>dllimport).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait-Are you saying you have the ability to run and exit processes from another application on the device?
Edit: Never mind, found your thread here. Just gave me an idea, nice work!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1006331

Jailbreaking bada

While this term has mostly been used with regards to iOS and WP7, has anybody jailbroken nada so unsigned apps (not cracked apps) can be installed?
Sent from my DROID2 GLOBAL using XDA App
The term here is "Spoofing"
Google is you friend here.
Yes, but in spoofing you must replace one app by other (and in soft newer than JK1 it isn't working). I think that OP want to install his own applications.
i think you will have to use bada ide to install the apps which failed the samsung app certification

[news]Samsung to open source bada in 2012

Samsung is planning to open source its bada operating system next year for outside developers and other phone makers to use the code. It is a very good news for BADA users. Hope this will help in spreading BADA OS and attract many more developers.
Source : http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsung-to-open-source-bada-in-2012_id22261
hmmmmmmmm
it is like "Leave me live today & kill me tomorrow"
Do you think bada 2.0 will get a jailbreak after that ?!
Just wait until 3.0 an hack it as you want
Also big question here Will Wave I/II get that update ?!
Also looks a similar story (Nokia, Symbian S^3)
I hope bada will be better than Symbian and won't die after that
Best Regards
It's just a big good news!!
Wish it will be real in 2012.
And wish developpers will follow Bada.
mylove90 said:
Also big question here Will Wave I/II get that update ?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Afraid not. SamFirmware tweet about Wave 3 updates begin Q2 2012, but nothing about Wave I/II.
mylove90 said:
hmmmmmmmm
it is like "Leave me live today & kill me tomorrow"
Do you think bada 2.0 will get a jailbreak after that ?!
Just wait until 3.0 an hack it as you want
Also big question here Will Wave I/II get that update ?!
Also looks a similar story (Nokia, Symbian S^3)
I hope bada will be better than Symbian and won't die after that
Best Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont really understand what did samsung mean by making it open source!! There are too possibility
1) they will open the OS only to other manufacturer.
2)including first option, they will also open up API a little bit more so a developer can easily access system services for better integration off apps. for example Like accessing notification bar from your app.
I am looking forward for the second option.
No bada will be open source
The SDK and the API you can download from opensource.samsung.com its no secret that the interfaces to bada are open, only the system is missing
but why get access to the notification bar? it is a main os component open everything means hack or get malware for everything.
I dont think android is open over api enough only a root can give you to all access but some users dont want this. To watch videos to surf the net or to write sms/email nobody needs root access, so this i am an opponent of.
We saw the possibilities of rooted iphones and android phones so i am scared of using a system that could have so much viruses like windows, this is not the future.
OS Modifications on an opensource os will be custom roms i hope so, no the stock rom. otherwize i would search an alternative cause a hackable system i dont want.
http://badamobile.wordpress.com/2011/09/21/samsung-there-is-decision-on-open-source/
Looks like these are only rumors. BADA is not going to be open source.

8.1 people Hub install on w10m

Hi, is there a hack to get the old people hub on w10mobile? Prior to creators update, I could use Facebook connect. I am annoyed that it doesn't work even after I use the original MSFT version of Facebook (worked on my hp elite x3 until cu)
People hub appx ?
saq333 said:
Hi, is there a hack to get the old people hub on w10mobile? Prior to creators update, I could use Facebook connect. I am annoyed that it doesn't work even after I use the original MSFT version of Facebook (worked on my hp elite x3 until cu)
People hub appx ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it possible to have even an older version of the "people app" on the latest w10m build? I just want the ppl app prior to creators update.
Hi. I wanted to fix it too. When i recover the system with windows device recovery tool things work and i always keep Microsoft Fbook app syincing just fine. The problem is that SO autoupdates itself from build to build. I copy data of apps with app data manager tool to try to get conclusions about it. I assume the problem is created on other apps that connect the info from FB to people. My best clue is the app named Content delivery manager. I tried to restore it but it fails.. when i try to recover this app with previous backup it also erases FBOOK to install but then it stops without ending the process.. I would need to inject it somehow to prove my theory. Info can pass through but not in the actual updated state of out OS.
Thanks, yes super frustrating that they intentionally continue to rip out the functions that kept the OS unique. My only guess us that they're trying to get rid of us.
saq333 said:
Thanks, yes super frustrating that they intentionally continue to rip out the functions that kept the OS unique. My only guess us that they're trying to get rid of us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Certainly makes you wonder. Im almost waiting for the day they flip an invisible switch and make the phones unable to connect to anything including your cell provider forcing us to ditch our bricks. They already forced the 8.1's to be unable to sync the MS accounts for months now. If that happens, i dont know what ill do, cause i refuse to use Android or iOS. Maybe ill find a flip phone...
do you thing they care any more ?
djtonka said:
do you thing they care any more ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Certainly not. For them to abandon for "iOS and Android app development" shows they give exactly two ****s about their users. I really wish i was a share holder...
When they moved away from WinMo for WP they really screwed up, but the users were *****ing for an OS that could run Win32 apps, so they gave us something "more powerful" but what they thought would compete with iOS and Android, which is completely backwards. If it werent for WinMo those two wouldnt be around. No Mac user ever complained that Apple didnt have a phone/OS and Google was just a search engine. Now granted, technology and progress dictate SOME change, but most 6.5 users loved it (I didnt, i think 6.1 was the best PPC version) only complaining about the hardware. I mean really, the HD1 was the pinnacle of hw? But, it could run Android, XP and WP7.8 (IIRC someone got RT to boot on it once or twice?), i never understood why MS was "happy" with HTC being the only HW developer until WP8. I would LOVE to see what a CE based WinMo 10 would do on a 950 spec HW. Prob run Win32 apps finally...

Categories

Resources