What profile does everyone use on the stock cm7 kernel? And why? - G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I generally stay with on demand but sometimes use conservative. While I like conservative it seems to sometimes take too long to bump up the processor and will cause a bit of lag after wake up.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App

I use Interactive 245 - 1113 MHz. It is similar to on demand but is more responsive in increasing CPU speed. I get great battery life, too.
You can read more about governor details here
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/cm-k...ebcc8db5/Documentation/cpu-freq/governors.txt

c00ller said:
I use Interactive 245 - 1113 MHz. It is similar to on demand but is more responsive in increasing CPU speed. I get great battery life, too.
You can read more about governor details here
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/cm-k...ebcc8db5/Documentation/cpu-freq/governors.txt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very informative if you read through it. thanks.

Ya thanx for the info on interactive! I'm gonna try it for the next day! Anyone else?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App

xsteven77x said:
Ya thanx for the info on interactive! I'm gonna try it for the next day! Anyone else?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using interactive and conservative. They've both offered good life. I'm using the streamline5 kernel now with conservative though.

Related

[Q] How fast is your Epic?

Ok, I have search, but didn't find anything like this. I am wondering for those that can overclock, what speed do you use for your daily driver? I don't mean what speed you use just to play with benchmarks.
I know the faster you overclock you have more battery drain, so answer honestly!
I'll be first, I normally run at 1.3ghz, but am now trying 1.4ghz to see how much more battery drain I will have. I love my epic, it has always been fast and stable. What I run is in my signature.
If you feel like it, list your rom, kernel, and what you use to set it. It will be cool to see how fast you guys like to run on a daily diet!
I run at 1ghz... But when aosp roms come out probly 800mhz... My phone doesnt lag at all i see no need for overclocking other than banchmarks.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I run at 1.2 whenever I can, it shouldn't drain your battery unless yur playing games and shhtuff.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Same as deano, 100-800mhz conservative, 90% of the time, 100-1200 ondemand rare. I UV also so the 100-800mhz really gets great life.
I run at 1400/100 "on demand" all of the time when on Froyo. No undervolting. I have 2 stock batteries so battery life isn't my #1 priority...everything working and stability is and fortunately 1400 is totally stable for me. I saw a greater performance increase from 1300 to 1400 than I did from 1200 to 1300
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
JohnCorleone said:
I run at 1400/100 "on demand" all of the time when on Froyo. No undervolting. I have 2 stock batteries so battery life isn't my #1 priority...everything working and stability is and fortunately 1400 is totally stable for me. I saw a greater performance increase from 1300 to 1400 than I did from 1200 to 1300
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can almost echo your findings, except I have been running 1300. Out of curiosity how much more battery did you use when you jumped from 1300 to 1400 if you remember?.
I also undervolt a little more from 600 on down than 800 and up, but I rather have more stable than more undervolt. I can't believe how nice hte eipic is even against the current crop of phones. I love it!
Running "on demand" I have noticed very little difference going up to 1400 because its only there maybe 30 minutes per battery charge. It only uses that top setting when its needed. Keeping the undervolt away from those high states will ensure more stability since most of our phones require the voltage on those overclocked states like 1300 and 1400. If you get -25 or -50 stable on those high states, you are pretty lucky
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
I use CFQ and run -50 on 100 - 200 - 300 - 400 - 600 and -25 on 800 - 1000 - 1200 - 1400 and is rock solid thru all of those frequencies.
Do you know if it is better to run less steps, something like 100 - 300 - 600 - 1000 - 1400 rather than how I have it set as above?
Don't forget to vote!
My phone doesn't like 1.4 jiggawatts. I stay at 1.2GHz. I'm running stock ec05 rfs with genocide. 4 hours and 10 minutes in I'm at 68%. With moderate to heavy use. I've been in bed for 2 days with a corneal abrasion. My phones the only thing I can play with lol
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
mouseglider said:
I use CFQ and run -50 on 100 - 200 - 300 - 400 - 600 and -25 on 800 - 1000 - 1200 - 1400 and is rock solid thru all of those frequencies.
Do you know if it is better to run less steps, something like 100 - 300 - 600 - 1000 - 1400 rather than how I have it set as above?
Don't forget to vote!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ise 100, 200,400,600,800,1000,1100 or 1120 (depends on kernel) and 1400. Its as smooth as can be so I don't try going with less frequencies
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
RushAOZ said:
...1.4 jiggawatts....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like that! If you don't mind, I like to use that in my sig if it works! LOL
Beasty!!!!!....EDIT...1.45 giggawatts...lol
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
mouseglider said:
I like that! If you don't mind, I like to use that in my sig if it works! LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao sure. Don't quote me though. I saw someone else use it and it made me rofl
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
1.4 jiggawatts!!! I'm surprised my phone didn't lock up. Usually does at 1.4 lol.
Ec05 stock rfs
3.1.0.1 rooted
Genocide yo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
RushAOZ said:
1.4 jiggawatts!!! I'm surprised my phone didn't lock up. Usually does at 1.4 lol.
Ec05 stock rfs
3.1.0.1 rooted
Genocide yo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best way to test stability is to max out both sliders, delect "performance" DON'T SET ON BOOT, and run benchmarks. If it doesn't crash after a few minutes, you should be ok.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
I'm using voltage control. You mean to force the phone to stay at 1.4ghz?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
RushAOZ said:
I'm using voltage control. You mean to force the phone to stay at 1.4ghz?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup exaxtly. do that for a few benchmark tests and try YouTube, etc....pushing the envelope on this one...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
I'm at 1.3ghz. CM7 doesn't like 1.4 for whatever reason.
Not undervolted, but i'm getting 24 hours with 65% leftover.
I'm quite happy!
JohnCorleone said:
yup exaxtly. do that for a few benchmark tests and try YouTube, etc....pushing the envelope on this one...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trap lol got some lock ups during dungeon defenders. All's good at 1.3 though. Thanx for the heads up dood!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
darkierawr said:
I'm at 1.3ghz. CM7 doesn't like 1.4 for whatever reason.
Not undervolted, but i'm getting 24 hours with 65% leftover.
I'm quite happy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn darkie, you can't get much better than that!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

SetCPU, What are your settings?

Anyone try SetCPU after rooting? I can adjust the min down to 192mhz. Anyone have any idea how safe it is yet as far as sleep of death?
Sorry if this is not in the correct forum
You can test whatever you'd like. I tried it too so just don't check the option for set at boot.
-Hercules composed this post and threw it at your face to be read-
Just worried since it is my alarm clock too, a sleep of death could lead to a sleep of no job
Some believe tegrak is better for samsungs
Sent from my SGH-T989
i believe there was something about needing a custom kernel that supports a cpu oc app. something about it not engaging both cores... just one of them. somebody out there knows more than me about this i'm sure.
I think i remember dsexton702 talkin about needing a kernel for tegrak to function properly
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
luckyduck69 said:
i believe there was something about needing a custom kernel that supports a cpu oc app. something about it not engaging both cores... just one of them. somebody out there knows more than me about this i'm sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A custom Kernel is only needed Fri overclocking.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Had mine set on 192 min all night and no issues with waking up so far.
mbernusg said:
Some believe tegrak is better for samsungs
Sent from my SGH-T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tegrak probably won't work properly if I'm correct set cpu or oc/uv beater should be fine. Tegrak was used for samsung processors. Qualcomm processors are able to scale better at lower or higher frequencies.
---------- Post added at 09:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 AM ----------
luckyduck69 said:
i believe there was something about needing a custom kernel that supports a cpu oc app. something about it not engaging both cores... just one of them. somebody out there knows more than me about this i'm sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will never engage both cores that is asynchronous. Both processors work independently from each other. This is why you see lag. Both processors are never at their full potential. Qualcomm design the processors for best battery life in mind with good performance. There is a way to get both cores to be synchronized though if it matters to you. But expect worst battery life.
Almost forgot we have a snapdragon lol
Sent from my SGH-T989
Moved to proper forum.
I put mine at 384 min and 1350 max .
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
mbernusg said:
Almost forgot we have a snapdragon lol
Sent from my SGH-T989
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The one we have should also overclock very nicely. The APQ8060 is the same one in the Touchpad and that one easily does 1.9Ghz.
When I installed setcpu and had it auto dectect speeds It atuomatically set the min at the max and the min at the highest clock speed. Is that normal? Did anyone else notice that?
hazard99 said:
When I installed setcpu and had it auto dectect speeds It atuomatically set the min at the max and the min at the highest clock speed. Is that normal? Did anyone else notice that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed that too but lowered the min and was able to setup profiles
agrover5279 said:
I noticed that too but lowered the min and was able to setup profiles
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's normal. I have noticed the same thing on the g2x and g2. I wouldn't worry about it unless it won't let you change it.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
I have mine set @ max 1512 min 384. Temps range from 77-84.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
I have mine at 192 min and 1512 Max with no issues
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA Premium App
Is it currently safe to overclock the phone using this app?
saltmine said:
Is it currently safe to overclock the phone using this app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. But you would need a kernel that supports Overclocking and Undervolting.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk

Kernel that is only undervolted but not overclocked?

Can someone post a link to a kernel that runs at the stock 1.5ghz but is undervolted? I don't care about performance. Just want the best battery life. Thanks!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Almost any kernal is better in battery than stock
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777
you can easily limit the CPU to not go over 1.5 or even 1.0
when i really want to save battery i keep CPU at 800 Mhz or 1.0 Ghz
Any of the kernels in the development section can be either under bolted or over clocked. I'm using synergy the way it comes out of the box and its great. Standby battery drain is unbelievable.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
AllGamer said:
you can easily limit the CPU to not go over 1.5 or even 1.0
when i really want to save battery i keep CPU at 800 Mhz or 1.0 Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why dont u UV ur 1.5ghz to 1.0ghz voltage? or near there?
That would be underclocking not under volting
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
AllGamer said:
you can easily limit the CPU to not go over 1.5 or even 1.0
when i really want to save battery i keep CPU at 800 Mhz or 1.0 Ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What app do you use?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
twolfekc said:
What app do you use?
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in CM ROMs it's build in
in other ROMs you can use SetCPU or faux or the other one i forgot the name right now
AllGamer said:
in CM ROMs it's build in
in other ROMs you can use SetCPU or faux or the other one i forgot the name right now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot man!!!
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
AllGamer said:
in CM ROMs it's build in
in other ROMs you can use SetCPU or faux or the other one i forgot the name right now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Other one = System Tuner
Sent from my Juggernaut SGSII or my "Galaxy Tasked" 10.1
twolfekc said:
That would be underclocking not under volting
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true, but i find it more effective than UV
yes, we can keep it at 1.5 Ghz with say -0.010v or something like that
it's just a minor hassle to tweak
you can open a Terminal in your phone and launch the command
some apps like the faux can let you control the voltage as well

[Q] Cpu governor problems with Viper x 2.2.1

Hi everybody this is my first post on xda.
love the forum!
I searched the forum about thi little problem im having with Viper x rom since i got the last OTA update 2.2.1, but did not find any answer to this or my searching skill sux.
So when ever i try to set Cpu governor to for example Conservative my htc one x reboots by it self after a minute or so.
Setting my Cpu governor to conservative does not stick after rebooting,
I am stock kernel i tried using faux m007 but my device rebooted again.
What am i doing wrong here?
Nice to be here and thank you all for help.
Use interactive. That's the recommended governor.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
eyosen said:
Use interactive. That's the recommended governor.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well i set to Interactive and i dosent reboot thats good but i was really hoping for Conservative so i could get some more battery time.
But then again i have been getting really good battery time with Viper X and stock kernel, so mabey problem solved??
But i am still a little curios to why my phone reboots when i choose Conservative
Thanx for your time =)
perpotator said:
Well i set to Interactive and i dosent reboot thats good but i was really hoping for Conservative so i could get some more battery time.
But then again i have been getting really good battery time with Viper X and stock kernel, so mabey problem solved??
But i am still a little curios to why my phone reboots when i choose Conservative
Thanx for your time =)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't conservative lock the CPU to its lowest speed? That is probably why it's crashing
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
treebill said:
Doesn't conservative lock the CPU to its lowest speed? That is probably why it's crashing
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was reading up on the different Cpu governer when i saw your reply.
Thats why my device keep rebooting (crash)
Thank you good sir

[Guide]Ultra Fast CPU Governor No Frills CPU

Hi all i want to share a No Frills CPU Governor
This Settings will make u phone free lag
No Battery Drain
Good for gaming too
Thanks
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
Sorry i wrong give screenshot
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
whats this?? are you just making threads??
post something that have sense
wrong,
it's actually kernel dependent,
but the best is 832max 624min for frequency
Thread Closed:
Sorry just don't see anything good coming from this but possible arguments.

Categories

Resources