HTC Thunderbolt Kernel - EVO 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Would it be possible to port the new kernels from the Thunderbolt over to the Evo? I have the new camera hardware on mine and don't know if the Thunderbolt went to the new camera also. If so, they have the Kernel hacked and running up to 1.92 GHz!! Would love to finally have a overclockable kernel for my new hardware phone.

jmsmeltzer2000 said:
Would it be possible to port the new kernels from the Thunderbolt over to the Evo? I have the new camera hardware on mine and don't know if the Thunderbolt went to the new camera also. If so, they have the Kernel hacked and running up to 1.92 GHz!! Would love to finally have a overclockable kernel for my new hardware phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ofcourse it would be possible to do so, but the Evo couldn't support the kernel because of the Hardware differences between the two.
And I am not trying to Police this thread, but sir all I will tell you is let the trolling begin. I am just warning you of those members, so next time try to post in QandA.

jmsmeltzer2000 said:
Would it be possible to port the new kernels from the Thunderbolt over to the Evo? I have the new camera hardware on mine and don't know if the Thunderbolt went to the new camera also. If so, they have the Kernel hacked and running up to 1.92 GHz!! Would love to finally have a overclockable kernel for my new hardware phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will not work on Evo... and I too am not the police but this is the wrong section... I fear for your online life at this point as pretty soon there will be internet bullets aiming for your head... And some of the people on this forum are better shots than Angelina Jolie in Wanted.. Duck son.. Duck now, LOL

Yellowcard8992 said:
And I am not trying to Police this thread, but sir all I will tell you is let the trolling begin. I am just warning you of those members, so next time try to post in QandA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, this IS a Evo Development thread!

Hm. I would think this would be an Evo development question, not a Q&A section question. Just my two cents

jmsmeltzer2000 said:
Well, this IS a Evo Development thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are correct, and I understand your posting it here to an extent because a lot of the time some questions get overlooked in Q&A. However, if you look at the last stickied thread in this section there is a post titled:
"Thread DELETED/Locked??? This is DEVELOPMENT section not Q&A/General!!!!"
I am not trying to be a prick, but XDA is a lot more accessible and easier to navigate when things stay organized.

Greenfieldan said:
Hm. I would think this would be an Evo development question, not a Q&A section question. Just my two cents
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree to an extent because it involves development, however the consensus for posting in the Dev section amongst many members is that you are making a contribution. I.E. a Rom or something to download I suppose.

jmsmeltzer2000 said:
Would it be possible to port the new kernels from the Thunderbolt over to the Evo? I have the new camera hardware on mine and don't know if the Thunderbolt went to the new camera also. If so, they have the Kernel hacked and running up to 1.92 GHz!! Would love to finally have a overclockable kernel for my new hardware phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even with there .36 kernel its not safe to overclock to 1.96ghz. that could be set in any kernel now, but you would probably fry your phone.
all evos have the same processors just diffident video stuff.
and unless you want to use sense you would have to port it to work with AOSP, so by the time your done with everything, you might as well stick with the great kernels that work well with 004 and below.

Greenfieldan said:
Hm. I would think this would be an Evo development question, not a Q&A section question. Just my two cents
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm. I would think this would be a Q&A Question, not an Evo Development question. Just my two cents
Not sure what's so hard about figuring out where to post questions.
edit: Thread moved, my point was made. Thanks egzthunder1.

Thread moved to Q&A.
The key point is not if it is a Development question, but rather the fact that it is a Question.

WOW! Next time I will post in Q&A.

Related

which is the best Rom at the moment?

which is the best Rom to use at the moment ?
jzmjr said:
which is the best Rom to use at the moment ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock because everything works and its not slow wait a week or so then we'll talk
hrm, I kinda agree with what he said .
Super excited for all the work being done though... but as a user with only 1 phone, I need to wait till things are a bit more stable.
best rom is over at android central
No Rom is the best yet lol. They are all the same Rom with apks (apps) added and removed. I mean really at the moment the only Rom that is actually different from any other Rom is my half ass working froyo build. This is the wrong section for this thread anyhow. Please post general question threads in q&a or general discussion, not the development forum.
toastcfh said:
No Rom is the best yet lol. They are all the same Rom with apks (apps) added and removed. I mean really at the moment the only Rom that is actually different from any other Rom is my half ass working froyo build. This is the wrong section for this thread anyhow. Please post general question threads in q&a or general discussion, not the development forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is that coming along?
jzmjr said:
which is the best Rom to use at the moment ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go post this in general
Kllian said:
go post this in general
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy Crap, off topic... is your avatar the snowman from that Windows 3.1 skiing game? Where he comes out and eats you after you've gone too far?!
I am rocking OMJ's rom posted at ppcgeeks and loving it.
Sent from my HTC Evo using Tapatalk.
jzmjr said:
which is the best Rom to use at the moment ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What toast said pretty much sums it up. Also, I've seen that posting questions like this can cause drama in the community. Be your own judge and try them all. Different strokes...
No such thing as the best rom as every user will have different opinions and like different things.
Usually opinionated threads like these are frowned upon on XDA as they create endless long threads with no real anser due to everyone having different opinions. For these reasons I am closing thread.....oh and moving it to Q&A due to it not being development related

[Q] [REQ] Eliminate Bump Charge

I have seen a few threads for the EVO 4G about eliminating the bump charge (100%-90% drop on disconnecting the AC), but I have not been able to find a thread for the DInc.
I am running SkyRaider 3.5 Sense w/Hydra UV Kernel on my SLCD DInc.
Any help on this subject would be appreciated. I am not sure this has been fixed yet.
Ptraillz said:
I have seen a few threads for the EVO 4G about eliminating the bump charge (100%-90% drop on disconnecting the AC), but I have not been able to find a thread for the DInc.
I am running SkyRaider 3.5 Sense w/Hydra UV Kernel on my SLCD DInc.
Any help on this subject would be appreciated. I am not sure this has been fixed yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even read any of the topics on in this forum. There are atleast 3 kernels working to fix this issue.
If your going to flame atleast point in right direction so this thread can die...
and seriously its on the first page... right in the title
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=885476
bradatz said:
If your going to flame atleast point in right direction so this thread can die...
and seriously its on the first page... right in the title
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=885476
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not here to teach people how to read. You can educate the blind if you like.
I was asking because I am running Sense and I was confused about whether or not it would be compatible.
Excuse a noob, but thanks for the flame and the information.
Try asking in the topic thats already been started.
GMK83 said:
I'm not here to teach people how to read. You can educate the blind if you like.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'd rather troll than teach? Damn, some guy.
lol @ this thread
mikesincredible said:
lol @ this thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, right?
GMK83 said:
I'm not here to teach people how to read. You can educate the blind if you like.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, it's annoying when someone not only asks questions in the development section (that's what the Q&A section is for) but also does so about something clearly covered on the first page.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Hey, if the guy didn't see the topic he's looking for, of doesn't know what exactly he's looking for, then thats his reason for making this thread. Don't have to bash him for not being able to find it. Geez, its Christmas, be happy.

[Q] Dumb question. Where are the DL builds?

Pretty sad that I have to resort to these "unofficial builds" due to the incompetency of Samsung/Sprint (not sure who to blame). These delays in getting out new code to what I would consider their flagship device is BEYOND SAD.
Anyway, early on we got the DK builds fairly quick. Any idea why DL is taking so long to leak?
Please stop creating threads here. Your questions should go in the General Section.
ragnarokx said:
Please stop creating threads here. Your questions should go in the General Section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am specifically asking about DL development builds. They should go into general??? Really????
Yes, really. Your threads have nothing to do with development, hence they are in the wrong section. Take a look at the General Section for examples of what kinds of threads go there.
My understanding is that the development forum is for threads containing ROMs, kernels, WIP development threads... Not threads with questions asking why we don't have this or that. Who cares about a DL build anyway? As far as leaks go, DK28 is super clean. The devs here have done some killer work with it too. Personally, I don't care about another leak unless it's maybe Gingerbread.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
None of the D builds matter anymore. New year, new letter. We are at EA right now. E being 2011, A being January.
I know this. But we are all still running D builds because we STILL haven't gotten a leak this year. It's been a whole week! We should have JELL-O by now.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
It might be fruitful to list the features you hope to see in a new 2.2 leak which are not present in the most recent leaked 2.2 version.
Yay another "where's my update that I'm entitled to" thread.
Milkman00 said:
I am specifically asking about DL development builds. They should go into general??? Really????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a Q&A section at the top of this dev forum. And by the way the rules do say to ask ALL questions in the General section or Q&A.
why CANT we have have a Q & A like the real popular phones? does it really matter that much
Milkman00 said:
Pretty sad that I have to resort to these "unofficial builds" due to the incompetency of Samsung/Sprint (not sure who to blame). These delays in getting out new code to what I would consider their flagship device is BEYOND SAD.
Anyway, early on we got the DK builds fairly quick. Any idea why DL is taking so long to leak?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Congratulations you are the 1000th poster of the same question. We will now give you the secret official release that us developers have had the whole time. Download it here...http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=904787
I hope the latest build converts my processor to a Tegra 2 running at 1.2ghz, converts my ram to 8gb, and makes my screen 10" with 1280x720 res.
ITT: wannabe mods doin their thang
Trust me. I don't want to be a mod. I don't have that kind of patience. I thank whodaman for his.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
plapczyn said:
Congratulations you are the 1000th poster of the same question. We will now give you the secret official release that us developers have had the whole time. Download it here...http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=904787
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Yep hehe
Sent from my ComBadge
MOD EDIT - Thread moved to Q&A. All queries should be posted in this section. Only matters relating to rom development should be posted in development forum
Milkman00 said:
Pretty sad that I have to resort to these "unofficial builds" due to the incompetency of Samsung/Sprint (not sure who to blame). These delays in getting out new code to what I would consider their flagship device is BEYOND SAD.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently Sprint doesn't see the Epic as their flagship device. Actually pretty sure they don't. They have the Evo at the top of their list.
Sent from my new BFF...Evo 4G that is!

Warm Twopointtwo No camera

To start off.. as if its not obvious enough (if this isnt dev thread worthy) Im an xda forum noob. But familiar with roms and kernels etc.
I have #0004 hardware, white, Evo. Flashed warm twopointtwo RLS5, which is my favorite so far. Ive tried manymanymany kernels and yet no camera (i open camera app and i get just a black screen). All kingx kernels past #7. Netarchy more aggressive v7 and ziggy kernels and more. Ziggy and stock are the only ones that have working cameras... but suck up battery..
Are there any camera fixes, or ROMS as fast as kingx that should fix my problem
p.s. dont tell me i need to wipe my caches, ive tried that...
cauk's format all.zip or whatever doesnt work.
nilesskate2 said:
as if its not obvious enough (if this isnt dev thread worthy) Im an xda forum noob.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you know you're doing it wrong but decided to post anyway?
Jesus just help the man out, rather than being counterproductive and just flaming him for posting in the wrong area.
As for the issue, search up some ROMS where people are reporting camera to work for hardware #0004.
aph said:
So you know you're doing it wrong but decided to post anyway?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think it IS worthy of this category considering it needs developement level help, and the answer isnt anywhere else. but there are always haters.
questions are meant for the Questions section. simple as that. people just cant seem to grasp that concept.
Ive seen this problem reported by many in the myn thread, wanted a separate discussion since its not getting solved there... and i as well as others with this problem am very attached to myn's masterpiece
ronnybej60 said:
questions are meant for the Questions section. simple as that. people just cant seem to grasp that concept.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is hardly a frequently asked question, but a dev discussion (hopefully, if i get to stop defending my validity)
nilesskate2 said:
this is hardly a frequently asked question, but a dev discussion (hopefully, if i get to stop defending my validity)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, this isnt a question section nor a discussion section. It is a section meant for developers to post their work.
If you do have a question about someone's work, ask it in the corresponding thread, not create a whole new one to clutter the forums.
I consider this less clutter considering it came from a thread of almost 4 thousand pages. And I was unaware that this was just for posting work, hard to tell since it isn't labeled such. So if this really isn't going anywhere. Let this post be deleted -_-
Sent from my Superphone. (Evo)
nilesskate2 said:
i think it IS worthy of this category considering it needs developement level help, and the answer isnt anywhere else. but there are always haters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It still shouldn't go here. But from his post he obviously wasn't sure. So just help him and move the thread.
dude... you need a kernel based off htc 15. thats why all the nets sbc v7's (which are built on older kernels) dont work. flash one of net's newest (4.3+) kernels or stock htc 15 and dont post in the wrong section.
I have posted in the wrong thread before myself. Its amazing how many people are waiting to flame someone for it.
If flashing a different kernel doesn't work you can try flashing this. Just make sure you backup first.
Myn's RL5 actually comes with htc kernel #15, did that kernel not work for you?
There were a few people with 004 models having issues with VirusZ rom and the 004 cam fix solved their issues.
aha. this thread adds nothing to the development community. It belongs in his thread or q&a.
Try the camera fix posted by calk.
I just tried netarchys most recent kernel (as a flamer suggested) which works.. and now I'm baffled as to why nothing else works including kingxs latest... and BTW, it did work on 15, but there were so many problems with it i couldn't use it
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
nilesskate2 said:
I just tried netarchys most recent kernel (as a flamer suggested) which works.. and now I'm baffled as to why nothing else works including kingxs latest... and BTW, it did work on 15, but there were so many problems with it i couldn't use it
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not all phones like all kernels... its just how it is.
You set your self up to be flamed. have no one but yourself to blame
dmoses1969 said:
There were a few people with 004 models having issues with VirusZ rom and the 004 cam fix solved their issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried that fix on multiple kernels, a couple times it fixed the camera.
but everytime it caused glitchy vertical lines at every screen
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
As a last comment before I let this thread die, by letting flamers flame, and moderators moderate. How about you folks not complain about posts like mine and instead, You rally for a subtitle under the development forum link that states "do not use any initiative to get valid problems solved here, do not discuss with development familiar folks about development level problems as this title suggests.. but DO use it for posting your software... nothing else"
-__-
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Wow White Knights made it out pretty early in this thread.
It's really simple. Big sticky that says this isn't Q&A. This is Q&A and no ROM development or Android development. It's someone who knows better, posting a Question in the Development section. If you have a question about a specific ROM, suck it up like everyone else and ask in that thread.
Follow the rules.
Back to the White Knights: Stop defending people who break the rules. This protect the ignorant mentality is baffling.
Sadly, answering these questions just leads to more and more cluttering crap in the development threads making it harder to find stuff than it already is.
nilesskate2 said:
You rally for a subtitle under the development forum link that states "do not use any initiative to get valid problems solved here, do not discuss with development familiar folks about development level problems as this title suggests.. but DO use it for posting your software... nothing else
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh dude, there has always been a big STICKY on this forum that says exactly what you just said. "Thread DELETED/Locked??? This is DEVELOPMENT section not Q&A/General!!!!"
And once more like has been said time and time again. If you have an issue with a ROM, suck it up like the rest of us and post in that ROM Dev's forum or PM them.

[DEV] Working HTC touchscreen driver fix for ICS, no porting necessary

ALL CREDIT GOES TO SWM5126, I am simply bringing it to the attention of HD2 devs. Please be sure to thank SWM5126 for his work.
Found this in the Android Software Development forum.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1332605
Hopefully this will help get ICS to us nice and quick. Knowing our device (and awesome devs!) we'll probably be running ICS before most other phones do!
ALL CREDIT GOES TO SWM5126, I am simply bringing it to the attention of HD2 devs. Please be sure to thank SWM5126 for his work.
Please no more ICS thread for every single new feature/fix ! Just post in the most popular ICS thread...
Argh, touchscreen worked correctly even in my test build, we don't need this.
By the way who is making stickies of this thread :S
jan-willem3 said:
By the way who is making stickies of this thread :S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Everything is being stickied nowadays.. irritating...
Yes this sticky is a mistake but I do find that with the work being done on various kernel these days, the kernel's threads being sticked is a good idea. Once they've all come to a mature state, it will be time to unstick them I guess...
Just trying to get the word out, I felt that this was a very big development and therefore warranted a thread, mainly for the devs. On that note, NRGZ28 felt that it was important enough to be stickied, and he's always been one of the top developers on the HD2, so I'll take his word for it
Let's keep XDA friendly and informative, as it's supposed to be
On that note, anyone been able to use this succesfuly on the HD2?
tgtoys said:
Just trying to get the word out, I felt that this was a very big development and therefore warranted a thread, mainly for the devs. On that note, NRGZ28 felt that it was important enough to be stickied, and he's always been one of the top developers on the HD2, so I'll take his word for it
Let's keep XDA friendly and informative, as it's supposed to be
On that note, anyone been able to use this succesfuly on the HD2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As posted before, Imilka had it sorted on the main ICS port thread already.
yz.hd said:
+1
Everything is being stickied nowadays.. irritating...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Infact I created a topic about this.
I think its our new forum mod.
Nigeldg said:
As posted before, Imilka had it sorted on the main ICS port thread already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think OP is trying to point out that the port is no longer necessary. I didn't look at the fix nor the port so I don't know what the difference is - but less change is better, right?

Categories

Resources