i have seen people posting quadrant score as signatures and after searching xda on what exactly is a quad score i could not find the answer.. anyway i downloaded the quad thing off market and done my own and my score is 1225.. thats real low compared to most i seen like between 1800-2816
It's a benchmark test, those on large numbers are on overclocked handsets (or they're just lying!!)
It's ego massaging so don't worry about it
ok i just wondered what it was thats all , as i have seen peeps signatures and seen screen shots of one phone saying 2816
great result last night .. or are you a blue
suarez liverpools number 7 wooooo
I'm a Gunner, I just live here
better than being a blue i suppose lol
With the apparent pending administration I'd say so!!
adz63 said:
as i have seen peeps signatures and seen screen shots of one phone saying 2816
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is 2nd gen snapdragon CPU those who get that high scores. They pack quite a punch.
Anyway, quadrant is just some stupid, inconsistent benchmark which doesn't point out anything and especially not real life performance.
Just uninstall it and enjoy your phone, mate!
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Related
http://http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1301759
check out the scores that iphone is claiming
http://www.redmondpie.com/iphone-4s...-as-galaxy-s-ii-and-all-other-android-phones/
tigerz0202 said:
http://http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1301759
check out the scores that iphone is claiming
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might wanna fix the link
mziol said:
Might wanna fix the link
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2nd post.......
i saw that several days ago
and then the next day after that went live, endanget (whatever spelling) found out those results were faked
similar to the way how we can make Quadrant show faster than it's supposed to, on devices you know by heart can't make it to 6000 quadrant
tigerz0202 said:
2nd post.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beat me to it!
AllGamer said:
i saw that several days ago
and then the next day after that went live, endanget (whatever spelling) found out those results were faked
similar to the way how we can make Quadrant show faster than it's supposed to, on devices you know by heart can't make it to 6000 quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ditto. Quadrant is a pretty useless AP in my opinion.
I find it hard to believe that my Nook Color can score 2400 on Quadrant and some GS2s here are scoring 2700.....see the uselessness in that app?
sounded more like a marketing ploy to sell more iphones to people who already have them .thats why i love android so many flavors . albeit iphoney is a good OS its just so boring for my liking . i would like to see what the percentage of sales that they brag about is to new iphone users meaning coming from a different device
hi guys i would like to overclock my desire to one of the maximums how can iget linpack scores at about 60. if you go in top devices in linpack people have 1804 mhz or 1600 hod do i overclock that much. what rom, what kernel.Are thosescores real.Thx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_mDTLphIVY
You can't overclock the desire anywhere near that. Why do you care about the scores anyway?
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
yeah the score on linpack is important to me, because thats what the speed depends from.if you go in lipack top devices you may clearly see 1804 on the nr 1 score and 1600 on the last.but even if it cant go at high then which rom may go the highest. thats more what im asking for 1800 is just a example.
1190 on most kernels. Shouldn't be important as its not the same as real world speed. You have a lot to learn
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
rootSU said:
1190 on most kernels. Shouldn't be important as its not the same as real world speed. You have a lot to learn
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually he doesn't. Obviously he done his part on researching and he knows what he wants. Linpack is a tool every Desire owner should have on his device and run it as often as possible. After all we all buy the most expensive graphics cards to run 3D mark all day long, not to play games or to bother ourselves with our needs, size of our screens and resolution we intend to play on.
SwiftKeyed from my HTC Desire using XDA App.
actually i know that linpack isnt all the realness of speed but its one of the most truthfull things to check the cpu.i mean quadrant is **** and i know about that.Do you know any kernel 1190 for reduxv2??
erklat said:
Actually he doesn't. Obviously he done his part on researching and he knows what he wants. Linpack is a tool every Desire owner should have on his device and run it as often as possible. After all we all buy the most expensive graphics cards to run 3D mark all day long, not to play games or to bother ourselves with our needs, size of our screens and resolution we intend to play on.
SwiftKeyed from my HTC Desire using XDA App.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These linpack and quadrant benchmarks are not exactly synonymous with SANDRA though. These don't give a realistic perspective on how well a phone will run. The only use is to compare your device with one setup against your device with another set up. Trying to beat the devices of others' is futile.
salata1500 said:
actually i know that linpack isnt all the realness of speed but its one of the most truthfull things to check the cpu.i mean quadrant is **** and i know about that.Do you know any kernel 1190 for reduxv2??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EVERY benchmark is ****. End of story.
rootSU said:
These linpack and quadrant benchmarks are not exactly synonymous with SANDRA though. These don't give a realistic perspective on how well a phone will run. The only use is to compare your device with one setup against your device with another set up. Trying to beat the devices of others' is futile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wink wink
I'm doing the same thing as always, but this time I'm doing it in the gloves. Terepin here got it I see
SwiftKeyed from my HTC Desire using XDA App.
I shall put it down to being ill
guys your changing the subject.!
What subject? This thread was predestined to be doomed before you posted it.
bechmark scores doesn't show the real daily performance.
i guess a ordinary desire takes a score of 1300 from quadrant. (correct me if i am wrong)
miui x-part rom takes it to 2500-2600... does it effects daily use, absolutely not...
on the other hand overlocking is not necessary, in my pov. you make your device hotter, unstable etc. and more importantly you will drain your battery much faster. and we all know that desire's battery isn't great.
but who takes those score and why? i guess those kernels are specific for bechmarking and not for daily use. i clocked my desire 998mhz for normal use and even less when the screen is off...
Any idea? Most reviews i saw for the GNex shows it getting 1700-2000+.
Meaningless or not, i wanna know why it's so much less.
Wtf
just4747 said:
Any idea? Most reviews i saw for the GNex shows it getting 1700-2000+.
Meaningless or not, i wanna know why it's so much less.
Wtf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I checked it right when I got the phone for the hell of it and got around the same number. The only thing I care about is if it will lag with daily use. If it doesn't I don't care if it has half a core and 1 byte of ram.
Quadrant scores are meaningless and don't give any indication of how the phone performs in real world use.
My old Galaxy S2 scored 4000+ in quadrant but does it feel 3 times faster than my Nexus definitely no!
Again, I don't care about what the test actually means but why are our scores so much lower on the same device compared to the reviews show? What is different and why? It leads me to believe that something is wrong.
I freaked too, but I think its bs. If you install System Monitor you can watch both CPU cores in action. Also, other bench tests clearly show that you're getting dual core performance. I think Quadrant will need an update.
just4747 said:
Again, I don't care about what the test actually means but why are our scores so much lower on the same device compared to the reviews show? What is different and why? It leads me to believe that something is wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get around 1400+ as well in quadrant and I don't think there is anything wrong as when I first got my GS2 my scores where lower than what was seen online from reviewers as well.
Don't forget they probably had a phone with no extra apps on it or just the bare minimum which could also affect the scores.
daleski75 said:
I get around 1400+ as well in quadrant and I don't think there is anything wrong as when I first got my GS2 my scores where lower than what was seen online from reviewers as well.
Don't forget they probably had a phone with no extra apps on it or just the bare minimum which could also affect the scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got a 1700 reading from quadrant. I don't know if quadrant takes advantage of the dualcore cpu?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Herman76 said:
I got a 1700 reading from quadrant. I don't know if quadrant takes advantage of the dualcore cpu?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it doesn't and it needs a desperate update anyway to fully support ICS.
Someone correct me if I am wrong about quadrant standard not seeing both cores?
It's the higher resolution mainly.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My benchmark scores are horrible. My girlfriends mytouch 4g slide continually scores better. Just doesnt seem right for this flagship phone. Anybody else?
Benchmarks means nothing.
If you're using Quadrant Standard, you're basing it off a benchmark designed for single core CPUs and hasn't been updated for months. Not to mention, it is not optimized for ICS or multi-core CPUs.
jjzah said:
My benchmark scores are horrible. My girlfriends mytouch 4g slide continually scores better. Just doesnt seem right for this flagship phone. Anybody else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And which benchmark app is that?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Yes i was using quadrant. Thanks for the info!
jjzah said:
Yes i was using quadrant. Thanks for the info!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using,
https://market.android.com/details?...1bGwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5hbnR1dHUuQUJlbmNoTWFyayJd
https://market.android.com/details?...51bGwsMSwxLDEsImV1LmNoYWluZmlyZS5jZmJlbmNoIl0.
Those benchmarks are optimized for multi-core devices. Unsure about ICS but it should provide a better comparison. And benchmarks don't mean anything (once again!)
Not really sure why you thanked him because he didn't offer any credibility towards answering your question, but ok -_-
Hi,
What benchmarks?
In what conditions (i mean if you run benchs in charge+10 benchs the one after the other->overheating->thermal protection->decrease cpu freq->lowers score/very low RAM/rogue/etc...)?
Rom?
Kernel?
Scores (especially in what benchs)?
And the most important is that your phone works perfectly?
Indeed,the benchs are sometimes subjective...
I agree Quadrant is out of age
The must is Antutu (bench "multiple things"),Cf Bench also but sometimes very inaccurate...,only certain benchs testing the cpu,others only the gpu (fps 2d/3d for example)and the other yet another cpu + gpu...
Screenshot of your benchs?
Much more detail would be welcome
zephiK said:
Try using,
https://market.android.com/details?...1bGwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5hbnR1dHUuQUJlbmNoTWFyayJd
https://market.android.com/details?...51bGwsMSwxLDEsImV1LmNoYWluZmlyZS5jZmJlbmNoIl0.
Those benchmarks are optimized for multi-core devices. Unsure about ICS but it should provide a better comparison. And benchmarks don't mean anything (once again!)
Not really sure why you thanked him because he didn't offer any credibility towards answering your question, but ok -_-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe he discovered a different benchmark tool which favored him more after my comment
Thank you for compensation ;-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
On the stock kernal with the ViperX rom.
I got 12500.
Now with faux kernal I get like 9000.
Why?
I have a MUCH lower CPU score in benchmarks...
Geez you already asked this, why another identical thread? Benchmark means nothing, case closed.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
yeah what is everyones obsession with benchmarks its just a number..
Benchmarks just a number? Tell that to people who drive race cars.
0-60 in 3 seconds is still better performance than 0-60 in 3.5 seconds. If both cars have the same engine, same gearing and weigh the same, then something else must determine why one is slower than the other.
Same way with our phones. Benchmark tests, especially AnTuTu, do offer insights into the performance of our machines. So, instead of giving the snarky answer that 'benchmarks don't matter', just say you have no idea or don't post at all.
yes maybe numbers are more applicable to cars. but this is a mobile phone forum not a car forum.....
the benchmarks mean sod all. the actual experience of using the phone is what matters.
benchmarks can vary from the slightest differences in environment, so yeah it is just a number, and will change for almost anything..
lawrence750 said:
yes maybe numbers are more applicable to cars. but this is a mobile phone forum not a car forum.....
the benchmarks mean sod all. the actual experience of using the phone is what matters.
benchmarks can vary from the slightest differences in environment. they mean absolutely sod all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? A Mobile Phone Forum? How did I miss that part??
Sure experience matters, but to a lot of people, so do numbers. And 3000 points would make a difference, both numerically and perceptually.
I think this thread should be closed and open a new one talking about 10b5.
Enviado desde mi HTC One X usando Tapatalk 2
Baldilocks said:
Sure experience matters, but to a lot of people, so do numbers. And 3000 points would make a difference, both numerically and perceptually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well seeing as the benchmarks can change literally from one minute to the next, and the fact they aren't that consistent, that essentially proves that the numbers don't mean as much as everyone makes out.
And therefore instead of basing how good your phone is operating on benchmark scores, just judge it on the actual performance of flicking through screens, loading apps , playing games etc etc - if there isn't a problem there, which i bet in the OPs case, there isn't any general performance issues, just a lower score. if there isn't any actual performance issues, then what the hell is the problem?
Hold on everyone. Small fluctuations in benchmark scores are nothing but a consistent drop of 25% is more meaningful, especially if all that changed was the kernel.
Why does everyone on here seem to just repeat what they read last week only with attitude added and regardless of factors such as severity.
To the OP... might be an idea to go back to stock and run several benchmarks to get a good overall picture. Note all the different scores for different tests (CPU, GPU, memory etc). Flash this kernel again and run several benchmarks. See which tests are affected and report your findings to Faux.
lawrence750 said:
well seeing as the benchmarks can change literally from one minute to the next, and the fact they aren't that consistent, that essentially proves that the numbers don't mean as much as everyone makes out.
And therefore instead of basing how good your phone is operating on benchmark scores, just judge it on the actual performance of flicking through screens, loading apps , playing games etc etc - if there isn't a problem there, which i bet in the OPs case, there isn't any general performance issues, just a lower score. if there isn't any actual performance issues, then what the hell is the problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Numbers shouldn't be inconsistent. My scores fall within 0.5-1% of each other every time I run them.
Certain ROMs can have a major impact on performance. Just like going to 4.0.4 and Sense 4.1 made a huge positive performance difference. Guess what, you could actually see that difference with 'useless' benchmark tests too.
Op,
Did you cry? Did your heart feel broken? I've heard benchmark scores are everything, they define smartphones these days.
ben-fisher-bro said:
On the stock kernal with the ViperX rom.
I got 12500.
Now with faux kernal I get like 9000.
Why?
I have a MUCH lower CPU score in benchmarks...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found a fix for you! Just read this post here! http://forum.xda-developers.com/announcement.php?a=81
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app