Even at 800mhz this new processor seems to be the fastest around. Had to run a benchmark myself to see if it lived up to the hype.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Has anybody used anything that handled Android better?
My G/F's getting a Droid 2 next week. She doesn't know it yet but I'm gonna have both phones battling at night.
I am curious that why the benchmark differs on the same model, some shows 13xx, and yours over 1500
what causes that difference?since g2 has yet to have root and overclock
I'm here in la and my g2 is throwing down 7600 to 9000. My rooted over clicked vibrant did 3000 max
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
For what its worth, my Nexus consistantly achieved 60 fps average running fps2d. My G2 usually gets between 55~58, but the G2 is still smoother and more responsive.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
Not sure but I'm constantly gettin' 159x or more... can't wait to get this G2 rooted and overclocked (not that its needed).
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
I don't know but when I run quadrant on my vibrant the DNA strand rotation running above 35 fps and the doom like 3d test run at mostly 40 frames and up with the occassional dip into 20 when it turns corners.
The G2 running the DNA rotation runs at 16 fps and the doom like test runs in the teens only breaking into 40 when it climbs the steps but when it begins turning on the stairs its drops back down.
The G2 chokes compared to the Vibrant on those 2 portions in Quadrant. That being said NeoCore runs equally on both.
I just got my g2 and I must say it looks nice and is fast. It does outperformed my vibrant in quadrant it gets 1600+, neocore 55-58, linpack 33. My vibrant gets 850-915, 55-59, linpack 8-9. Now by those numbers I would say yes the g2 is more powerful but it needs to be a fair fight. When the vibrant gets 2.2 and ill do the tests again.
Sent from my SAMOLED Vibrant using XDA app
Yea..havin 2 galaxy phones..I can safely say that the vibrant is stil a bit more powerful. I noticed it stutters a bit when using the 3d drawer in launcher pro..but the vibrant/epic was a full 60fps during that transition.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Related
How far have people got with over clocking their Visions?
Mines over clocked at 1GHz, i don't think id be increasing it any time soon think it would ruin my battery life
How far have all you all got to? Stable of course
just realised its in the wrong thread sorry il repost in the right one, sorry for an inconvenience caused
You didnt need to open another one. For future ref,.... Just hit
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
and a mod will move it. I'll do it now.
where is that icon btw? i cant seem to find it
Yeah, its tiny aint it. Good job for asking.
i've got the flashable zip and i'm set to 1804 Mhz and running o so smooth, to save battery i dim the screen and use 2g whenever not using the web
shadyx513 said:
i've got the flashable zip and i'm set to 1804 Mhz and running o so smooth, to save battery i dim the screen and use 2g whenever not using the web
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy sh** son! I used that kernel for a bit just for fun a few times, you don't tick away at 1.8GHz all the time do you? 1.1 - 1.2GHz for me all the time.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
My G2 Is oveclocked to 1.51Ghz. I am running DezireZ ROM Vitreous v1.81. Great sense rom.
Sent from my HTC Vision
yeah the G2 FAST rom is amazazing. As long as you set profiles for screen off, temperature, and battery life.... you are gravy. mines clocked @ 1.89 for about 1/2 the day, and i only charge my battery once a day. JUST MAKE PROFILES!!!!!!!
If you give cyanogenmod a shot it comes with a 1.516 kernal.. I get quad scores in the 2200 zone. If you use rom manager (koush is a hero!) You can download cyanogenmod 6.1.1 and do a backup if you don't like it.
G2 CM6.1.1
Is there any possibility on removing the 60FPS limit that is on our devices? I know our devices can do more than 60FPS!
Im sure there is a way, it was done on the EVO 4g.
What would be the point since you can't see a difference?
mattykinsx said:
What would be the point since you can't see a difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure that SAMOLED+ has a 60hz refresh rate? Because if not, we might be able to. 75hz isn't all that uncommon.
Also: Even if you can't see it, more often then not you can feel it.
mattykinsx said:
What would be the point since you can't see a difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to be a WoW geek back in the day, and I'm here to tell you, you can definitely see a difference between 60fps and 75fps...
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Is there really a limit? I get over 60fps during parts of quadrant
Yes there is a limit. On Quadrant you will notice it never gets over 62, even though the limit is 60 there is some play but we should have well over 60.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
ssconceptz said:
Yes there is a limit. On Quadrant you will notice it never gets over 62, even though the limit is 60 there is some play but we should have well over 60.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty sure I've seen over 62 but I could be wrong,
goes to overclock and run more quadrant
The only problem is I am not sure if its limited in the CPU or GPU so overclocking may not help much.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
As I stated the overclock will only boost CPU section of Quadrant therefore the FPS never goes over 60 FPS as its an illusion of when its switching from 60 to 50. I ran multiple tests and OC only boosted CPU. Boosting FPS would improve 3d scores.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
SocialReject said:
I've always gotten lower scores (barely 2000, sometimes a little more than 3000) and was wondering if I was going crazy or this is normal. I've tried so many rom/kernel combinations but no luck.
I'm on AOKP and I'm getting 2068 and lower.
Comes from the Epic and the GS2, I was kinda expecting a lot more.
Sent from the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The updated quadrant reports much lower for all devices. The GN isn't as much of a "benchmark queen" as the SGSII has potential to be. Unless your phone is reporting a score far under what Quadrant reports as typical, don't worry about it.
I'm benchmark app free
There are a few posts around with people showing around 4000 on quadrant i think. Dont know which roms though. Search the benchmark thread.
ive found the BEST stability and over all best scores without over clocking with the official cyanogenmod 9 nightly i get 3000+ with that... but like the dude before said quadrant scores are all hype... just use a rom with good speed that works best for u.
I don't always choose a ROM based on 1 stat...
but when I do, its for Quadrant.
Quadrant doesn't really translate to real world use.. why do people obsess over quadrant scores so much? If the phone runs well it runs well I don't need third party software to tell me if my phone is running fine.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
My best is ~3700 using AOKP B25 & Imoseyons 3.0.20 kernel. Undervolted, stock clocked and using Ondemand.
Never even used quadrant...
#Likeaboss B-)
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
user experience > quadrant score
idc about quadrant, i just want a clean phone w/o bloatware with lot of resources and support
I owned a Sprint SGS2 and while quadrant scores were in the 3000's consistently and the GN is in the 2000's I cannot tell the difference in speed between the 2 of them.
Now with quad cores, they will even score higher but how much smoother can a device run then smooth as butter?
If you don't think your phone runs smooth, then try AOKP and turn your swag on. Let's see if the iPhone 4s can do that sh.t!
I get around 3200-3300 give or take a hundred running AOKP build #26 + franco.Kernel 18.6 oc'ed to 1350mHz (minimum 700mHz) and using conservative governor. The UV has been left as it came with the kernel or whatever.
I have to add that I just got this phone a couple of days ago, and I am totally and utterly giving this the title of best phone I have ever had. I can't believe the person I got this off of actually switched to an iPhone because of battery issues xD
Aokp build 25
franco.kernel @ 1.65ghz (the new releases don't go this high because it's unstable for some)
interactive governer
Close:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Considering how the S4 Pro in the Nexus 7 is actually just a downclocked version of the Snapdragon 600 I presume there is a decent amount of wiggle room for overclocking. Yes, these are probably the worse chips out of the binning process to have been condemned to live the rest of their lives as S4 Pros, but would hope all of these should easily be able to achieve the 1.7Ghz Snapdragon 600 specs. Maybe even some lucky owners could push theirs to and beyond what we see in the Galaxy S4 at 1.9Ghz.
Now I'm just speculating as my Nexus 7 isn't even here yet (still in shipping). I made this post to make some discussion on the matter. Like people who've already tried messing with clock speeds and voltages on theirs could share their findings here. Talk about what kernels permit what levels of tweaking. Or even GPU overclocking/governor tweaking etc...
So, discuss!
I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.
bmlarson said:
I've tried running it over 2.1 Ghz with no problems at all. I really just wanted to see what a benchmark could get up to. I didn't check the voltages were. I tried running it fairly hard and of seemed to do alright.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the score of the benchmark you got? Is it almost the same as S600 devices?
I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
bmlarson said:
I was able to atget up to 8849 on quadrant. It is consistently above 8000 for me using CyanogenMod and an overclocked kernel at 2052 Mhz CPU and 487 MHz GPU. At 2052mhz it is at 1175mV.
Edit: I got a slightly better score again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems the the score of the benchmark are the same with Xperia Z stock with S4 Pro.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Running at 1728mhz for days now, GPU at 487, handles perfectly fine.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Ok so I know quadrant isn't everything but please tell me why I have a stock att ogp with the lag of an optimus t? Did a factory reset and still the same thing. I let go of my HTC one for this device...I love it but what gives? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
When I first got my OGP I was getting 7-8000 on quadrant, but I certainly wasn't experiencing any OS lag. So if you happen to be from stock, there may be something especially wrong with your phone or there is something causing it issues. I originally had a corrupted SD Card on mine that caused some terrible lag issues for the day I did not know it was corrupted. Currently I nail 12,000s on my quadrant scores. I run the April factory OS without value pack, as the value pack seemed to cause some framerate slowdown in games and a lower quadrant score for me. My OS is de-bloated, and thermal mitigation is off (you can find this setting in your hidden menu). It helps to run Quadrant with a 60% brightness or lower starting the benchmark with a cold phone.
I have both the htc one and the OGP and my One scores a 2450 on geek bench 2 while my OGP hits 3000~. Granted my OGP is rooted and I use the performance governors but still they have identical SoC.
Do you have quad core optimizer on by chance? Also do you run this on a clean boot?
Yeah it's on but what I did was flash the telcel firmware and everything was just fine. It was like night and day! No stuttering or lag of any kind!
Sent from my LG-E980h using xda premium
I'm on E988 stock rom and got 12,000 in quadrant. Just rooted. Nothing modified.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-E988 using xda app-developers app
It's crazy though. Whenever I open quadrant, and look at system info it says my cpu speed max is 1728 but it runs at 1132 until I enable the thermal mitigation and it will read 1728. I'm on the telcel firmware and I can't find the High temperature property in the dial pad menu.
Sent from my LG-E980h using xda premium
When I was stock, I ran an 11,5XX on quadrant. When I rooted and ran the stock ROM that's debloated and optimized I broke 12,000.
On my last two AOSP ROMs the phone feels so much lighter(os) but I only score down around d 8,000
Sent from my LG-E980 using xda app-developers app