Just done small comparison between 2.1 and 2.2 using linpack. On 2.1 it comes out with an average os 2.2 Mflops while on 2.2 it comes out with about 3.7 Mflops. What's everyone else getting?
I got the same scores
i heard the linpack doesnt give accurate results...i may be wrong.
have you all been able to use the Neocore(Qualcomm benchmark app) or Open GL benchmark with this new ext2 builds? all of those wrked perfectly on the older system sqsh. now i cant get them to run on this new builds with ext2. also alot of live wallpapers from b4 not wrking. anyone with any insight into this? ill do a linpack on mine device, which is basically overclocked to the max, to post what scores i get.
Related
So I know about nenamark and fps2d I run both those tests frequently.
but I flash the nightly builds and the new snap kernel v7 and I wanna know more about how exactly its affecting my system.
can someone link me to information about these popular tests that you guys do on your phones?
things like linpack and stuff? i wanna see how my scores stack up
btw i get 16.6 in nenamark and avg of 52+ in fps2d and
stdev=8.41 but is usually above 11.. whatever that means.
I just need more information about all these different tests..
haha
Hi,
Not sure if this is mean't to go in here, so apologies firstly if it isn't.
My friend has a Samsung Galaxy S Android phone and from Stock 2.1 he gets a score of about 800 from Quadrant. He looked on the forums and noticed a post for a fix to do with application lagging here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=760571
This is an APK which appears to install a EXT2 partition on the internal SD card/memory. This increased the Quadrant score to over 2100, not so far from 3 times the score without the fix. The ROM itself has not changed, he still has stock installed, but his phone was rooted to do this.
My Desire now looks feeble in comparison to the Galaxy, with a score of around 1100 in Quadrant. I am running the LeeDroid ROM and have the latest radio installed.
I don't know enough about the make up of the two phones or enough experience of Linux to know if this is possible on the Desire. If someone can get a similar performance increase in the Desire, that would be amazing.... Any ideas?
Thanks
Jason
are you using Lee's 1.9a ROM? if so, it addded a new default governeur(sp?) for setCPU that's interactive.. when you first run quadrant, it'll always show a low score cause the CPU runs slow, then ramps up as it's needed.. Run the test a few times back to back, and see the score rise. I'm getting into the mid to high 1300's steady after running it a couple times to get the CPU up there.
Have you read the FAQ?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7620940&postcount=2
There he explains what this fix is and why it works and why it probably only really works on the Galaxy
PS: your Quadrant score is pretty low, I get about 1500-1600 without overclocking. However the Galaxy S haas a faster hardware.
can someone please inform me how the tmobile galaxy s phone can reach quadrant scores of 2400 and im only pushing 1200
I've hit 2700 on my Evo my penor is HUGE!
haha funny i actually seen his quad score so i know its true
I wouldn't think too much of it. Cyanogen showed that the difference between 1200 and 40 gabillion in quadrant can be something as rediculous as the filesystem. I don't put much weight in those scores when comparing different phones.
http://briefmobile.com/cyanogen-demonstrates-quadrants-flaws
ok so other then cm what other rom/kernel would reduce lag and increase speed right now im trying fresh 3.3.0.1 with king kernel #9
jjarn said:
ok so other then cm what other rom/kernel would reduce lag and increase speed right now im trying fresh 3.3.0.1 with king kernel #9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you try installing >>Snap 7.6 kernel on a Sense ROM and then try to enable TURBO? That'll *should* get you scores beyond 2000 but I'm not sure how well it works. >>Snap kernels are designed for CM ROMs ONLY and there is no support for installing a >>Snap kernel on a Sense ROM - but I've read about others who've done it. Maybe give that a try? I haven't done it so I won't be any help but I've read about it which means maybe it'll work for you.
Dude I really don't understand why you're so concerned with Quadrant scores. It's just a number.
_MetalHead_ said:
Dude I really don't understand why you're so concerned with Quadrant scores. It's just a number.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, it does ultimately represent something. But unless you can see a real difference, I wouldn't care so much.
If your phone is snappy and smooth, it shouldn't matter what score you get in Quadrant. When I was on CM6 I was scoring 2000+, on Fresh I get around 1650 and I think my Evo is running way better with Fresh than it did with CM6.
well see ive tried fresh with the kings kernel and still not gettin that high i wanna try nets kernel but not sure which one is compatible i like baked but takes too long to boot i also like fresh
Have you tried the new official kernel? It's not going to give you crazy quadrant scores but it will make your battery last a lot longer + I think the way HTC lifted the cap makes it smoother than the custom kernels. It makes the phone more useful which IMHO is more important than Quadrant scores.
Sporkman said:
WATCH OUT his e - penis just shrank 2 inches
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for providing me with my new signature!
any suggestions? I loved the speed and benchmarks i got from cm6/7.6 snap. Just wondering the highest quadrant scores going around right now for our beloved evo and how i can aquire the same. Im sure this has been talked about recently but thought id renew the subject. thanx!
I'm on cm7 nightly release 7 and I didn't get the same results in quadrant as I did in cm6 with snap Turbo. Right now in cm7 I get 1248 score.
quadrant changed something inside it, now it is limiting the score, or fixed the exploit that the evo used before. dunno which but scores have been slower across the board
NewZJ said:
quadrant changed something inside it, now it is limiting the score, or fixed the exploit that the evo used before. dunno which but scores have been slower across the board
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't put a lot in Quadrant scores, but it does kinda put a lil smile on your face when you bust the top. But I have noticed here the last week or two my scores are way lower. Sometimes lower than Evo 2.2
The best scores I ever had were with MIUI...
thunderwagn said:
I don't put a lot in Quadrant scores, but it does kinda put a lil smile on your face when you bust the top. But I have noticed here the last week or two my scores are way lower. Sometimes lower than Evo 2.2
The best scores I ever had were with MIUI...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here my quadrant score was at its highest with MIUI....
yeah i know it isnt worth much but it does put a nice smile on my face when i crack a high score. i remember with cm6/snap turbo 7.6 i was getting around 3000 or slightly higher, which was crazy. Now im lucky if i break the evo 2.2 one. It was just a thought, i know it doesnt mean much in the real world.
Still worthy app. Fun if nothing else I guess lol.
Give MIUI a whirl. Its got some nice speed and great battery life to boot!
Kinda the same as above. MIUI with Savage-Zen is pretty awesome scores...
However, i really dont care TOO much about scores, so i go by battery life and just responsiveness to my use.. and i am LOVING CM7 nightlies. Last one i flashed was #6 and seriously, this is the first time EVER i have had an AOSP rom as my daily driver...
give that a shot if you have CM6... i would try the Savaged-Zen 1.0 Kernel (cause i LOVE SBC) and see what you think... it really BLEW MY MIND!
DarkManX4lf said:
I'm on cm7 nightly release 7 and I didn't get the same results in quadrant as I did in cm6 with snap Turbo. Right now in cm7 I get 1248 score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry if I sound dense, but are you saying CM6 is much faster than CM7? I'm not sure what the scores mean.
i used to get 1300 to 1400 with my stock rom but now cm7 build 23? nightly i get anywhere from 1500 to 1600, gonna flash the newest rom and see what happens
Add another vote for MIUI. Not only is it the fastest ROM with the highest benchmarks (which don't even matter), it also provides superior battery life and looks gorgeous.
Ive used several ROM's in the past on my Desire so far CM7.1 has had the highest benchmark for me at 1600 to 1700 i thought that to be pretty high but can people post what their highest benchmark is on the Desire, i want to know if 2000 is possible.
Which benchmark tool do you use.
On Antutu I consistently get over 2400.
Why do you care for benchmark scores anyway? The only important thing should be if a rom feels smooth and fast enough for oneself. This personal feeling cannot be shown by a number (no matter how high or low it is).
I was meaning Quadrant not antutu.
Mattdroid I was just wondering because on cm7 I got 1700 but on runnymede aio I get 400 usually which is really slow
With miui Rom and amarulz d2x script I got a 1970 on quadrant but with normal a2sd script on the same Rom quadrant score was 1200 although made no diff to smoothness of Rom
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
kiwiflasher said:
With miui Rom and amarulz d2x script I got a 1970 on quadrant but with normal a2sd script on the same Rom quadrant score was 1200 although made no diff to smoothness of Rom
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can say quadrant score is not really reliable. It's all depends on the ROM setup. It is always at a high score for a data2sd, data2wherever, adx2sdx, int2sd and lower at a2sd and app2sd. It can be lower or higher with some tweaks in int.d.
If I ever need a benchmark, I would go for antutu, with whatever setup it always give more or less the same score for the same ROM.
In my opinion, Linpack will show if the rom is fast or slow. I tried Antutu and Quadrant but the scores do not match how I feel for the roms speed.