I found this app over at ppcgeeks created by a guy named KidGixxer that is able to safely overclock our Touch's up to 624Mhz. I have mine overclocked to 624 right now and it is just stupid fast.
HTC Performance
response
are you able to actice sync your phone after overclocking it? I had the batter clocker and everytime I overclocked my phone, my active sync wound't connect. Are you any problems with you active sync?
Does anyone know if this app even does anything? I'm running it also on my Vogue and although it seems snappier if it really does anything I think that people have said that it's not upping your processor speed. And no, no problems syncing or anything.
Question, Do you know how much heat the proc is putting out at 624? because thats a pretty decent sized overclock... Hate to see it fry out after a while on ya...
No heat, nada. It may not be doing anything as per other posts. Seems to do something for me but it may be the power of whishful thinking : ) .
trehouse said:
No heat, nada. It may not be doing anything as per other posts. Seems to do something for me but it may be the power of whishful thinking : ) .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ran the benchmark in TCPMP and it didn't score any better than it did with out this program. I don't have SPB Benchmark.
I installed on my Touch and see no difference whatsoever
this tool isn't intended to overclock qualcomm chips found in sprint touch. its for intel xscales.
therealholg said:
this tool isn't intended to overclock qualcomm chips found in sprint touch. its for intel xscales.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes such is true, that is for the intel PXA series processors not the MSM7500 chipset and samsung processor used in the touch
XmentalX said:
yes such is true, that is for the intel PXA series processors not the MSM7500 chipset and samsung processor used in the touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So where do we get one for the Sprint Touch?
From what I know, the processor in the HTC Vogue (thats all CDMA version Touches, like the one Sprint sells. If your Touch has no SIM card, its a Vogue, not an Elf.) is a Qualcomm 7500, which is in fact a dual-core processor... At least, I think I read that somewhere. Anyways, as such, there is no application that can overclock that processor. Sorry fellas. The GSM version has a TI OMAP 200mhz processor, which can ironically be OC'd to 624, faster then the CDMA's Qualcomm processor. But they still don't get the double RAM!
Qualcomm isnt a dual core cpu!
You mess words with future's!
Intel means with dual core ... two cpus like a multi cpu system. Os can use both cores.
Qualcomm and TI OMAP have only one cpu for OS! Qualcomm use a ARM11 and OMAP a ARM9. The secound Cpu is for Radio only and a ARM7 Cpu. It means ... two Cpus are in one Chip Case but it isnt a Dual Core Cpu like Intel or AMD PC Cpu. Both Cpus are only connected with a little rs232 interface (OMAP use this way) to communicat.
Sorry for my very bad english!
Wrong, the Qualcomm MSM7500 in the sprint touch has two cores. One core is a 400MGhz ARM11 for main OS work, and a 133MGhz ARM9 for all radio related operations.
OrionSX said:
From what I know, the processor in the HTC Vogue (thats all CDMA version Touches, like the one Sprint sells. If your Touch has no SIM card, its a Vogue, not an Elf.) is a Qualcomm 7500, which is in fact a dual-core processor... At least, I think I read that somewhere. Anyways, as such, there is no application that can overclock that processor. Sorry fellas. The GSM version has a TI OMAP 200mhz processor, which can ironically be OC'd to 624, faster then the CDMA's Qualcomm processor. But they still don't get the double RAM!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is correct, it is impossible to push the MSM7500 pask 400Mhz, well really 384MHz
correct. I tried it anyway on the VOGUE and didn't notice a difference. deleted.
OrionSX said:
From what I know, the processor in the HTC Vogue (thats all CDMA version Touches, like the one Sprint sells. If your Touch has no SIM card, its a Vogue, not an Elf.) is a Qualcomm 7500, which is in fact a dual-core processor... At least, I think I read that somewhere. Anyways, as such, there is no application that can overclock that processor. Sorry fellas. The GSM version has a TI OMAP 200mhz processor, which can ironically be OC'd to 624, faster then the CDMA's Qualcomm processor. But they still don't get the double RAM!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you push the OMAP past 300Mhz, it starts to get really unruly. I don't think anyone has succesfully overclocked it to 624. 624mhz is the standard accepted overclock for the xscale chips. It doesn't make much sense to use that number in reference to the omap.
overclock mogul 6800
does the HTC Performance work on the Mogul 6800 as well . Seems to be that the Mogul doesnt use xscale processor. Cant use hack master,etc.
Also Mogul has 400 mhz CPU processor, whats seems the best overclock speed without distroying the processor
studio41 said:
does the HTC Performance work on the Mogul 6800 as well . Seems to be that the Mogul doesnt use xscale processor. Cant use hack master,etc.
Also Mogul has 400 mhz CPU processor, whats seems the best overclock speed without distroying the processor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is currently no way to overclock the qualcomm msm 7xxx chipsets (mogul and touch)
Related
http://androidandme.com/2010/06/new...s-all-other-android-phones-in-gpu-benchmarks/
I found this to be interesting and a bit odd that we have all of this talk about the "Mid-Range" Cpu at 600 Mhz but no talk about the GPU. Does anyone have some information on the GPU and if they are receiving similar scores in this category?
Can we officially stop calling this a "Mid-Range" phone if this turns out to be true?
Remember the phone is only 320x480 res vs the N1, Droids, etc 480x800+. That alone will greatly improve the performance (if same GPU).
IMO a Large res display is required for a high end phone too.. though a good one its still a mid level.
Please post this is the correct section.
mesajoejoe said:
Please post this is the correct section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This question is very relivant to the development of this device.
This all goes back to my mantra, lastest dont always mean the greatest. Hell, put it in this perspective...any woman would sacrifice an inch for better performance. I would much rather something do what its supposed to do and do it with blazing colors, than have something look pretty with all the bells and whistles and hiccup in comparison. Ive played with all the android phones from tmobile thus far, and the slide is by far my fav.
My reasoning behind throwing this in the development section was to hopefully find someone who could shed some more light on the GPU in this phone. I am sure that the pixel differences between this device and others are part of it but it seems as if more is going on in the background with this phone. Here are some questions this benchmark test brings up for discussion:
1.Is this GPU Open GL ES 2.0 capable?
2.Has Qualcomm opened up more possibilities with this GPU drivers compared to other phones?
3.It seems that this is an Adreno GPU, but which one? The Nexus has an Adreno also.
4.How much of this phone is hardware accelerated compared to other phones? I remember taking up the RAM from my G1's GPU to help run the main components of the phone, maybe this phone has a bit more help built in to it.
Let's all run to tmo and drop one so we can see what's inside! I for one just compaired it to the mt1.2 and it blows it away! The wife loaded up her baseball flash site and flipped at how fast it rendered the stuff. The screen res ain't got nothing to do with that. Maybe they fibbed on the cpu info so we wouldn't know. Or they got themselves one smart dev for software building.
Has anyone tried linpack tests yet?
mejorguille said:
Has anyone tried linpack tests yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack is 2.6+ for the one i tested at the store.I think the CPU is honestly down-clocked from what it really is, for all we know it could go up to 800Mhz or 1GHz. When linpack ran there were some b/g apps open.
Re: Mid-Range? Whatever...
If you look at the power.xml in github for Wes Garners's developments on this phone you will see the option for 998mhz as the high end for this cpu. I'd imagine overclocking it will bring at least 1.3 to the table. No info on the GPU yet.
Sent from MTS using Tapatalk
Re: Mid-Range? Whatever...
mejorguille said:
Has anyone tried linpack tests yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Mflops came out around 2.2. It needs to be tweaked severely but id assume this is due to the bloated processes and underclocking of the CPU.
Sent from MTS using Tapatalk
i dont understand why everyone is hating on this phone, my g1 is perfect. does what i need from android. and i like it over all. i never have problems with my processor. so this phone is a huge plus to me. although id love to make the sence ui on it a lil differnt, like the normal sence
mtjnkee said:
Yes. Mflops came out around 2.2. It needs to be tweaked severely but id assume this is due to the bloated processes and underclocking of the CPU.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? That's very low in my opinion when a droid, also running a 600 Mhz get much higher, and my rooted g1 with cyan kernel 2.6.34 get 2.3-2.4 on linpack.
Wikipedia says that the mytouch slide has a MSM7227 processor compared with Snapdragons which are QSD8xxx series. Some google searches found that the 7227 is for "cheap", sub $150 smartphones. Here are the specs for the processor:
Code:
The platform -- known as the MSM7227 -- is apparently designed with higher-power,
lower-cost handsets in mind, offering HSDPA / HSUPA radios, a 600MHz CPU, 320MHz
application DSP, 400MHz modem processor, hardware-accelerated 3D graphics, Bluetooth 2.1,
and GPS support integrated in a 12mm x 12mm chipset. The MSM7227 can also supposedly handle
8 megapixel camera and 30 FPS WVGA encoding / decoding with ease, and is capable of
supporting Android.
1
2
mejorguille said:
Really? That's very low in my opinion when a droid, also running a 600 Mhz get much higher, and my rooted g1 with cyan kernel 2.6.34 get 2.3-2.4 on linpack.
Wikipedia says that the mytouch slide has a MSM7227 processor compared with Snapdragons which are QSD8xxx series. Some google searches found that the 7227 is for "cheap", sub $150 smartphones. Here are the specs for the processor:
Code:
The platform -- known as the MSM7227 -- is apparently designed with higher-power,
lower-cost handsets in mind, offering HSDPA / HSUPA radios, a 600MHz CPU, 320MHz
application DSP, 400MHz modem processor, hardware-accelerated 3D graphics, Bluetooth 2.1,
and GPS support integrated in a 12mm x 12mm chipset. The MSM7227 can also supposedly handle
8 megapixel camera and 30 FPS WVGA encoding / decoding with ease, and is capable of
supporting Android.
1
2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well thats because the droid has a better processor (not speed but type) and the G1 is rooted and all the bloatware cut plus probably jit enabled plus swap/comcache. Besides that score seems rather low. I have a G1 and the MTS is way faster. I dont need a benchmark test to tell me that. Its definately as fast as my friends droid may be faster.
I know its been said before but it has the same gpu as the n1 for me that makes it all the proccessor i need
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=5719829
neva dinova said:
I know its been said before but it has the same gpu as the n1 for me that makes it all the proccessor i need
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=5719829
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awesome
Z51 said:
awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
either way, its better than the g1 and mt3g and even the 32a mt3g's.. when it gets rooted, this device will fly even moreso than it already does. bloatware be damned, we'll have it working wonders and fixing aids!*
aids may not actually be fixed by rooted slide
I know right. This morning I was looking at the running apps and saw the following that ran even if you cleanly booted it up:
* Visual Voicemail (don't get many VMs, so it's useless to me)
* Faves (useless)
* Swype (useless to me)
* IM (why is this even running?)
* AppPack (useless)
* My Account (useless)
Each of these apps take 20 MB or more.
marvinp said:
I know right. This morning I was looking at the running apps and saw the following that ran even if you cleanly booted it up:
* Visual Voicemail (don't get many VMs, so it's useless to me)
* Faves (useless)
* Swype (useless to me)
* IM (why is this even running?)
* AppPack (useless)
* My Account (useless)
Each of these apps take 20 MB or more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with a clean rom, we're gonna have so much extra space we'll have no need for a2sd
I found this video with the new LG-LU3000 Android device with OMAP 3630 CPU at 1 Ghz. In the video can see that the new LG is faster than Samsung Galaxy S and iPhone!!
I hope that the custom ROM will come soon!! (with OC)
Source: en.akihabaranews.com/74638/phones/lg-lu3000-world-fastest-smartphone-yet
I can't post direct links, sorry
Maybe i'm wrong but omap3630 go up to 800 mhz not 1ghz. Instead, omap3640 reaches 1ghz.
take a look here, but there are many other sources, just google for omap36xx.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Instruments_OMAP
Btw, defy itself is equipped with 3630, motorola's specifications say 3610 but they also include a powerVR graphic chip (which is ONLY present in 3620, 3630 and 3640 processors), so it's clear it can't be 3610.
Then i agree with your, TI cpus are great, in my opinion a lot better than qualcomm.
The Defy one is underclocked afaik.
If you check your wiki-link and and follow the Cortex A8 reference, it clearly states the CPU supports everything between 600Mhz and 1Ghz+
Overclocking should start beyond that point, because the CPU supports the mentioned speed already...the defy doesn't use it to increase the battery-life.
Yes i see, 600 to 1000 mhz. I was not 100% sure so i wrote "maybe i'm wrong".. but this is better than i expected.
So, defy + froyo + overclock to 1ghz =
I'll be happy enough with 2.2 and without overclocking. Also, FWIW, the processor range according to android system info (market app), the processor can run at 300, 600 and 800 mhz. My defy is scoring higher than the SGS as it is on quadrant.
I love the defy. My first and as of now favorite android phone. Not as pricey as some of the "top end" android devices, just as fast and powerful (moreso in a lot of cases), rugged, great battery life. I'm hooked! It's a mini beast!
MTDG said:
Overclocking should start beyond that point, because the CPU supports the mentioned speed already...the defy doesn't use it to increase the battery-life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm afraid you're wrong.
Just because the CPU supports a 600-1000MHz range, that doesn't mean that it will use the same amount of power at those speeds.
If you look at the likes of desktop and laptop CPUs, they down-clock to reduce power usage when there's less load on them.
So, yes, Motorola's decision to clock the CPU at 800MHz instead of 1GHz may well be a decision to save battery life.
That's what i wanted to say
Sry for my bad english :x
is there any way to overclock to 1G? using setcpu?
Is there any good reason to overclock it?
I was wondering if it will be possible to overclock the gpu , because my cpu of my htc one v seems to be insanely good , even ran the max 2ghz for few hours , then restarted when i moved the app the storage card, so could be just sd card bug or something , but i switched it back to 1.8ghz(245mhz idle) , anyway my quadrant score is quite low because of the gpu , because i hit 4,1k cpu score at 2ghz , and have seen other phones being able to overclock the gpu.
Hope to see the gpu overclock able soon, will make this phone even better
hereticangel said:
I was wondering if it will be possible to overclock the gpu , because my cpu of my htc one v seems to be insanely good , even ran the max 2ghz for few hours , then restarted when i moved the app the storage card, so could be just sd card bug or something , but i switched it back to 1.8ghz(245mhz idle) , anyway my quadrant score is quite low because of the gpu , because i hit 4,1k cpu score at 2ghz , and have seen other phones being able to overclock the gpu.
Hope to see the gpu overclock able soon, will make this phone even better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My can withstand the 2ghz constantly without overheat, but that is the cpu. The gpu is a different story.
Ken-Shi_Kun said:
My can withstand the 2ghz constantly without overheat, but that is the cpu. The gpu is a different story.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm just check again my memory and Io score seems to be a problem , score just over 1.9k, seems to low
hereticangel said:
hmm just check again my memory and Io score seems to be a problem , score just over 1.9k, seems to low
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a known issue with the Titanium kernel (KISS has e.g. the same values here as stock)
you can read about it in the kernel thread for this kernel
But I doubt that those benchmarks values make a noticable difference in daily usage
So if you need OC more then 1.5GHz just stay with Titanium.
If you think that I/O values will make your device slower use KISS kernel
Regards
max
PS: Regarding the original question
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=710850
There you can read all about OCing the GPU
Common point at the end. They didnt found a way to do it
thanx for the reply, was just wondering about score , phone it selfs seems very fast and have no problems with it
ok so the gpu scales with cpu overclock then , must say ashalpt 6 plays very nicely
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1424345
that guy did overclock hes gpu with 220 chip , maybe new ones can be overclocked only.
Hi
hereticangel said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1424345
that guy did overclock hes gpu with 220 chip , maybe new ones can be overclocked only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sensation has a Snapdragon S3 One V has S2
regards max
i am pretty sure i saw an app called "Dual" something on the LG P990 threads and it had the option to overclock the gpu*
*if the kernel supports it
sorry for digging up old thread, but... are there now any chances for OCing GPU?
parkourz said:
sorry for digging up old thread, but... are there now any chances for OCing GPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no we're only adreno 205. Only adreno 220/225 supports OC.
MameTozhio said:
no we're only adreno 205. Only adreno 220/225 supports OC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's stupid... phones with Adreno 220/225 are almost shining and new, so where's need to OC them?
parkourz said:
It's stupid... phones with Adreno 220/225 are almost shining and new, so where's need to OC them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is the qualcomm sanpdragon s3 new
The new ones are Adreno 420, 330, 320, 305 etc.
on Snapdragon 400, 800, 600, s4 pro, other ones I forgot (805 for adreno 420?)
MameTozhio said:
How is the qualcomm sanpdragon s3 new
The new ones are Adreno 420, 330, 320, 305 etc.
on Snapdragon 400, 800, 600, s4 pro, other ones I forgot (805 for adreno 420?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I wrote "almost" so we have to wait for AdrenoBooster for ICS/JB
Good news for me on my One S I will OC my GPU
Wysłane z mojego HTC One V przy użyciu Tapatalka
I need it cuz I'll get a ONE x+ which has 1.7 preloaded. Also with loop device pls?
ATT PLS!
HTC one and a half still isn't as fast as the 4 core krait LG
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
mrdumbdumb said:
HTC one and a half still isn't as fast as the 4 core krait LG
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I need 1.7 for special purposes.
Sorry, but I have to call BS on this. There is zero reason that you"must" have a 1.7GHz instead of a 1.5GHz regardless of which system is actually faster.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
dbgeek said:
Sorry, but I have to call BS on this. There is zero reason that you"must" have a 1.7GHz instead of a 1.5GHz regardless of which system is actually faster.
Sent from my LG-E970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Run damn Linux idiot. Then dock to tv, I can play tf2 on my fing phone
awesomehacker said:
Run damn Linux idiot. Then dock to tv, I can play tf2 on my fing phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.... and 1.7 GHz is required for that, regardless of the chip architecture? I'm not a computer engineer, but I know that a 2.0GHz Celeron processor can't do anything faster or better than a 1.5 GHz i5 (even if there is a bigger number in front of the "GHz"). Processor speed only matter if you are talking about the same chip architecture.
btw... there's no need for name calling.
dbgeek said:
.... and 1.7 GHz is required for that, regardless of the chip architecture? I'm not a computer engineer, but I know that a 2.0GHz Celeron processor can't do anything faster or better than a 1.5 GHz i5 (even if there is a bigger number in front of the "GHz"). Processor speed only matter if you are talking about the same chip architecture.
btw... there's no need for name calling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The game requires 1.7. That's why I'm asking 4 it.
awesomehacker said:
The game requires 1.7. That's why I'm asking 4 it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So... If I had a CPU that ran at 1.5GHz, there's no way the game could run on it, even if the processor/system is 1,000 times as powerful? Something simply doesn't sound "right" about that. We're not talking about requiring wavelengths of light syncing up or frequency of signal (if we were then computers of different frequencies could never "talk" to each other).
---------- Post added at 10:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:09 PM ----------
so the CPU requirements on Team Fortress 2 states
"Minimum: 1.7 GHz Processor, 512MB RAM, DirectX® 8.1 level Graphics Card (Requires support for SSE), Windows® 7 (32/64-bit)/Vista/XP, Mouse, Keyboard, Internet Connectiond
Recommended: Pentium 4 processor (3.0GHz, or better), 1GB RAM, DirectX® 9 level Graphics Card, Windows® 7 (32/64-bit)/Vista/XP, Mouse, Keyboard, Internet Connection"
EDIT: I neglected to add.... And if the game requires something above what current phone processors can do, 1.7GHz has NOTHING to do with it.
You understand that both of the phones that you are considering have a more powerful CPU than a Pentium 4 (which is 12 year old architecture), right?
awesomehacker said:
The game requires 1.7. That's why I'm asking 4 it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SO lets say u got a game and it needs i3 @ 3Ghz to run and you got i7 @ 2.8Ghz so your saying it wont RUN ROFL?
awesomehacker said:
Run damn Linux idiot. Then dock to tv, I can play tf2 on my fing phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to burst your bubble but even with steam coming to Linux its only x86 not arm, and opengl not egl.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
dbgeek said:
So... If I had a CPU that ran at 1.5GHz, there's no way the game could run on it, even if the processor/system is 1,000 times as powerful? Something simply doesn't sound "right" about that. We're not talking about requiring wavelengths of light syncing up or frequency of signal (if we were then computers of different frequencies could never "talk" to each other).
---------- Post added at 10:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:09 PM ----------
so the CPU requirements on Team Fortress 2 states
"Minimum: 1.7 GHz Processor, 512MB RAM, DirectX® 8.1 level Graphics Card (Requires support for SSE), Windows® 7 (32/64-bit)/Vista/XP, Mouse, Keyboard, Internet Connectiond
Recommended: Pentium 4 processor (3.0GHz, or better), 1GB RAM, DirectX® 9 level Graphics Card, Windows® 7 (32/64-bit)/Vista/XP, Mouse, Keyboard, Internet Connection"
EDIT: I neglected to add.... And if the game requires something above what current phone processors can do, 1.7GHz has NOTHING to do with it.
You understand that both of the phones that you are considering have a more powerful CPU than a Pentium 4 (which is 12 year old architecture), right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
... and notice that the RAM in the phones is 4X the minimum required.
While we're on this topic, the GPU is far more likely to be your limiting parameter, than the CPU. You need to research that aspect (the GPU's in phones aren't designed to run TV's esp today's large form HD TV's).
dbgeek said:
... and notice that the RAM in the phones is 4X the minimum required.
While we're on this topic, the GPU is far more likely to be your limiting parameter, than the CPU. You need to research that aspect (the GPU's in phones aren't designed to run TV's esp today's large form HD TV's).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have my phone rooted and would like to now overclock the CPU to 1.7GHZ just for the heck of it. I know the negative affects this can have on my CPU so I don't need a preaching. How can I do this?
Thanks!
loool
build a kernel with OC features
02transam said:
I have my phone rooted and would like to now overclock the CPU to 1.7GHZ just for the heck of it. I know the negative affects this can have on my CPU so I don't need a preaching. How can I do this?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was playing around with LiquidSmooth, RootBox, and Houcha kernel in April. Also ended up purchasing FauxClock.
Some combination of those on some date allowed a CPU overclock to 1.7 GHz and GPU overclock to 487 MHz.
Wasn't interested in the overclock capability, so didn't mark down the dates or versions. But it's definitely possible.
Sent through the magic of an LG Optimus G (E971) running RootBox 4.2.2.
phoenix_rizzen said:
Was playing around with LiquidSmooth, RootBox, and Houcha kernel in April. Also ended up purchasing FauxClock.
Some combination of those on some date allowed a CPU overclock to 1.7 GHz and GPU overclock to 487 MHz.
Wasn't interested in the overclock capability, so didn't mark down the dates or versions. But it's definitely possible.
Sent through the magic of an LG Optimus G (E971) running RootBox 4.2.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's is possible yet useless with our phone. Also, our chip doesn't like overclocking at all. Finally, the worth of energy loss vs performance gain is not good enough to justify using overclock.
Totally agree with you chad.
On this device oc is useless,you don't compare overclocking a galaxy s with an optimus g.
Not to mention it's not that easy,to find the proper voltage/freqs table.too much work "just for the heck of it".
Sent from LG E975 pwd by CM 10.1
Thanks for the responses. My old galaxy was a hoot to overclock and i just guess i miss that.
chadouming said:
It's is possible yet useless with our phone. Also, our chip doesn't like overclocking at all. Finally, the worth of energy loss vs performance gain is not good enough to justify using overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never said it was useful, just that it was possible.
Once you get above 1Ghz dual-core Cortex-A9/Krait/A7, everything is gravy, and it's the GPU or memory controller that becomes the bottleneck. Just look at how poorly the Tegra3 is...mainly due to crappy GPU and limited memory bandwidth.
Sent through the magic of an LG Optimus G (E971) running RootBox 4.2.2.
I just bought the faux 123 app hoping it would let me overclock the cpu but it wont. Everything i have tried wont let me go past the factory 1.5ghz.
02transam said:
I just bought the faux 123 app hoping it would let me overclock the cpu but it wont. Everything i have tried wont let me go past the factory 1.5ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a kernel which supports OC is needed.
you can buy all cpu tools and no one will let you overclock the cpu without OC features. haha rofl
and there is NO kernel for OC available and i hope it never will be
Does the Nexus 7 really has a Snapdragon 600?
pham818 said:
Does the Nexus 7 really has a Snapdragon 600?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By default, yes. However I used TricksterMod to upgrade it to a Snapdragon 800. The device is absolutely flying now :good:
You can't "upgrate" S600 to and S800 , the S800 is a newer cheap - uses a newer Krait 400 cores which are more optimized and power efficient and on top of that it has a newer more powerful gpu - adreno 330 vs 320 on the S600/S4 Pro , also the S800 has a newer DSP embedded so it can decode 4K content.
clock to clock the S800 would be faster, and as the S600 wasn't design to run at 2.26GHz (highest bin of the S600 is 1.9GHz on the S4 , then the 1.7GHz on the HTC One, and finaly there is the Nexus 7 Which uses underclocked S600 with different branding) the S800 would be more power efficient .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)#Snapdragon_600
[sarcasm]
pfeffernuss said:
by default, yes. However i used trickstermod to upgrade it to a snapdragon 800. The device is absolutely flying now :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[/sarcasm]
Can you help me upgrade mine!?
I can't seem to understand the purpose of overclocking the flo. It's fast and smooth any way that you put it. Not to mention the potential damage that you can do to your precious tablets (especially from the extreme heat of the overclocked cpu & gpu combo).
_______________________________________
Phone: HTC EVO 4G LTE
Rooted, Custom Rom & Kernel
Tablet: ASUS Nexus 7.2
Rooted, Stock Rom & Kernel
iamezio said:
You can't "upgrate" S600 to and S800
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)#Snapdragon_600
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
aarsyl said:
I can't seem to understand the purpose of overclocking the flo. It's fast and smooth any way that you put it. Not to mention the potential damage that you can do to your precious tablets (especially from the extreme heat of the overclocked cpu & gpu combo).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My idea exactly. Hence I underclocked the CPU and GPU and don't notice any performance decrease.