Hi,
I try to figure out if last year's Gear VR is fully compatible with my new Galaxy S9 and get conflicting information on this topic. Some sites say that the Gear VR for Galaxy S8 (SM-R324) will work with the Galaxy S9, e.g. on Android Central:
"First, you can tell just by the look of the device. If the headset is black and comes with the motion controller, then it works with the Galaxy S8 and therefore will also work with the Galaxy S9. Second, you can check your headset's compatibility using your Gear VR's model number. You can follow our how-to guide to find your model number. If your device's model number is SM-R325 or SM-R324 then your Gear VR will work with the Galaxy S9."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
However, there is an article on cnet.com that says:
"Samsung's newest phones, the Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus, didn't debut with any new VR hardware. They do work with the Gear VR. However, they only work with the Note 8 model released in September last year, not the nearly identical Galaxy S8 version that debuted in March that same year. We confirmed this with Samsung. The issue is all about the fit.
Apparently, the design of the S9 is different enough that attempting to put it into an earlier S8-compatible Gear VR, released in early 2017, could damage it. Samsung advises using the Note 8 Gear VR, released in September 2017, for the best fit."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has anyone tried putting a Galaxy S9 into a SM-R324 headset? I'm asking because the SM-R324 is more favorable than the latest model (SM-R325), but I don't want to damage my phone in the process.
Thanks for your help!
STOP! All you need is one of these!
Genuine Samsung Gear VR4 2017 SM-R325 Type-C Adapter/Connector - GH98-42239A
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07C59BRLQ/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_zogbBb3MCJ5JM
A lot cheaper than a whole new headset! You will need a stanley knife or craft knife to shave a small bit of plastic from the adapter but this is easily done and will be apparent when you compare the old and new adapters side by side.
I had the same question just a few days ago searched on the internet for it but couldn't find anything about it apart from a tweet from samsung australia which confirmed that sm-r324 should work just fine. So i bought it anyway since it was only 30 euro's for me. That article of Cnet also made me hesitate buying the r324 variant but I've tried it and can confirm that it works just fine. It fits perfectly and does definitly not damage the device. So yes you can buy the r324 variant no need for the r325 version. At least for the normal s9 (not sure about the s9+ but doubt it's any different)
I have a sm-r324 that worked with samsung galaxy s9+ until I upgraded to android 10.
Now, when I plug in the phone Oculus does not start and all that I can see (if I open the app manually) is the picture in which there is the indication to insert the gear vr (but nothing happened).
I have uninstalled all oculus app and service and inserted again the phone into gear, then I heard the sound e installed again all the app suggested (default procedure).
Do you know if there is some trick to make reworking the gear vr or is it better to install again android 9?
Thanks
[email protected]@ said:
I have a sm-r324 that worked with samsung galaxy s9+ until I upgraded to android 10.
Now, when I plug in the phone Oculus does not start and all that I can see (if I open the app manually) is the picture in which there is the indication to insert the gear vr (but nothing happened).
I have uninstalled all oculus app and service and inserted again the phone into gear, then I heard the sound e installed again all the app suggested (default procedure).
Do you know if there is some trick to make reworking the gear vr or is it better to install again android 9?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Today I received oculus for gear vr update and it is perfectly working.
Im completely new to Android having just ditched my company-supplied iPhone and bought an A50 (love it by the way!)
Are there any watches compatible with this phone that I can get notifications etc? I am not sure what specifications I need to check that the A50 has. The Samsung web site doesnt list the A50 as being compatible with Galaxy watch so should I just be looking at bluetooth compatibility.
Thanks for any pointers.
Yes you can use galaxy smartwatch with A50
I am using Galaxy Watch with A50. TOTAL DISASTER ! Watch and phone are disconnecting/ connecting frequently. Had no problems with same GW and Lenovo P2.
Samsung support completely useless as usual.
I have a Gear Fit2 Pro that I used with limitations paired to an iPhone but the full feature set works flawlessly with the A50 including quick replies, clearing notifications, complete message content and caller ID on every call.
It doesn't ever disconnect in the same room but I found the range pretty limited compared to the iPhone, so I assume Bluetooth range is more of an A50 issue.
After last firmware update for Galaxy A50 and firmware update for Galaxy Watch - both work perfectly in pair.
From what I can tell the One UI 2.5 firmware update for the Galaxy A50s is presently available only in Vietnam, but as always, the rollout should expand to additional countries soon enough.
What I read is that Galaxy A50s owners can enjoy One UI 2.5 and all its new features such as Bitmoji functionality for Always On Display, an improved camera experience, new Samsung Keyboard features, SOS functionalities for Messages, Google’s navigation gestures for third-party apps and more.
It will also include the November security patches.
Cool. This are the forums for A50 though. Rumours are, it'll come in December.
Samsung support service in the US confirmed that it will come out for the A50 in December if everything goes as planned
Also update for Europe should get out A505FNXXS5BTK1 and the log file said it's 2.5
That's nice but I prefer Google's PixelUI, it's more smoother and not power eater like OneUI.
But for someone who wants to keep with stock, it's probably great news.
My apologies if this has been addressed in the past but I did search and search quite a bit, not only on major search engines but XDA as well and could not find any mention of this.
For the device inventory settings, when adding a device I've noticed many of the newer devices linked to their respective forums have the Manufacturer input as Not Specified
Yet the older device forums appear to consistently have that correctly filled with whichever company manufactured them.
For the Motorola forums this is pretty evident as nearly all of the newer releases have an unspecified manufacturer, my guess is the XDA forum migration may be the reason that process fell apart.
It's clearly no top of the list issue given the more pressing things needing to be addressed but since I found no way for users to submit or edit this tiny bit of device detail, I presume it's left either to forum moderators or XDA admins.
Anyway, please excuse my obsessive compulsion for maintaining complete and accurate lists.
This for instance?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
woodman said:
This for instance?
View attachment 5388297
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do notice this too
It's happened to me before seeing some devices saying not Specified
It doesn't say it for every single device but does say it for some devices
woodman said:
This for instance?
View attachment 5388297
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Precisely this. And it's even more baffling to see as in your screenshot both the S21 and FE have it populated correctly but not the S21+ and Ultra? All but one came out the same month this year so there goes my assumption that it was a forum migration issue. It seems more likely due to whomever creates the device forum at the time isn't filling out that particular text field on the form. I'm completely clueless on that end of things.
woodman said:
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is fixable for sure. I remember handling a report that a user had made regarding the same issue with another device forum and Mike took care of it for me.
mario0318 said:
My apologies if this has been addressed in the past but I did search and search quite a bit, not only on major search engines but XDA as well and could not find any mention of this.
For the device inventory settings, when adding a device I've noticed many of the newer devices linked to their respective forums have the Manufacturer input as Not Specified
Yet the older device forums appear to consistently have that correctly filled with whichever company manufactured them.
For the Motorola forums this is pretty evident as nearly all of the newer releases have an unspecified manufacturer, my guess is the XDA forum migration may be the reason that process fell apart.
It's clearly no top of the list issue given the more pressing things needing to be addressed but since I found no way for users to submit or edit this tiny bit of device detail, I presume it's left either to forum moderators or XDA admins.
Anyway, please excuse my obsessive compulsion for maintaining complete and accurate lists.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
woodman said:
This for instance?
View attachment 5388297
I assume this kind of issues would be for @MikeChannon
Please any ideas if it's fixable?
I think a lot of devices could have a missing manufacturer...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it's not normally me who adds the graphic or manufacturer, but I can add any manufacturers you find are missing.
Mike
MikeChannon said:
Yes, it's not normally me who adds the graphic or manufacturer, but I can add any manufacturers you find are missing.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks Mike, could we use this thread to request such issues when us xda members come across them? Or another thread?
woodman said:
Ok thanks Mike, could we use this thread to request such issues when us xda members come across them? Or another thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but best to give me a "mention" or I'll miss it.
Mike
MikeChannon said:
Sure, but best to give me a "mention" or I'll miss it.
Mike
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great! Thanks, we will do this in this thread.
@mario0318 or any other members, I guess you/we should feel free to report here and mention Mike in case you come across some other "not specified" devices regarding the manufacturer.
@MikeChannon
Here is my first pass, OnePlus and Samsung.
My first "not specified" list:
Spoiler: List
OnePlus 9R
The OnePlus 9R is a 6.55" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G chipset is paired with 8/12GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 48+16+5+2MP and the selfie camera is 16MP. The battery has a 4500mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
OnePlus 9
The OnePlus 9 series features three different devices including the OnePlus 9, OnePlus 9 Pro, and OnePlus 9R. The OnePlus 9 is a 6.55" phone with a 2400x1080p 120Hz display. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset is paired with 8/12GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 48+50+2MP...
forum.xda-developers.com
OnePlus X
The OnePlus X is a compact handset with a budget-friendly price. It's OnePlus' third handset, featuring a 5.0" 1080p AMOLED display, a Snapdragon 801 CPU with 3GB of RAM, and the ability to use two SIMs, or one SIM plus a microSD card. The camera is 13MP sensor with f/2.2 aperture, and the front...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Intercept
The Samsung Intercept is a 3.2" phone with a 240x400p resolution display. The main camera is 3.15MP and the battery has a 1500mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy SL i9003
The Samsung Galaxy SL i9003 is a 4.0" phone with a 480x800p resolution display. The TI OMAP 3630 chipset is paired with 4GB of RAM and 16GB of storage. The main camera is 5MP and the selfie camera is VGA. The battery has a 1650mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660
The Samsung Galaxy Gio GT-S5660 is a 3.2" phone with a 320x480p resolution display. The Qualcomm QCT MSM7227-1 Turbo Snapdragon S1 chipset is paired with 158MP and RAM and 278MB of storage. The main camera is 3.15MP and there is no selfie camera. The battery has a 1350mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos i9082
The Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos i9082 is a 5.01" phone with a 480x800p resolution display. The Broadcom BCM23550 chipset is paired with 1GB of RAM and 8/16GB of storage. The main camera is 5MP and the selfie camera is VGA. The battery has a 2100mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A32 4G
The Samsung Galaxy A32 4G is a 6.4" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Mediatek Helio G80 chipset is paired with 4/6/8GB of RAM and 64/128GB of storage. The main camera is 64+8+5+5MP and the selfie camera is 20MP. the battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A72 5G
The Samsung Galaxy A72 5G is a 6.7" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The 8GB of RAM is paired with 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 64+12+5+5MP and the selfie camera is 32MP.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A72 4G
The Samsung Galaxy A72 4G is a 6.7" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G chipset is paired with 6/8GB of RAM and 128/256GB of storage. The main camera is 64+8+12+2MP and the selfie camera is 32MP. The battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy F62 / M62
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a 6.7" phone with a 1080x2400p resolution display. The Exynos 9825 chipset is paired with 6/8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. The main camera is 64+12+5+5MP and the selfie camera is 32MP. The battery has a 7000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy A12
The Samsung Galaxy A12 is a 6.5" phone with a 720x1600p resolution display. The Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 chipset is paired with 3/4/6GB of RAM and 32/64/128GB of storage. The main camera is 48+5+2+2MP and the selfie camera is 8MP. The battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy M02s
The Samsung Galaxy M02s is a 6.5" phone with a 720x1600p resolution display. The Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 chipset is paired with 3/4GB of RAM and 32/64GB of storage. The main camera is 13+2+2MP and the selfie camera is 5MP. The battery has a 5000mAh capacity.
forum.xda-developers.com
AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note 7
The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has a 5.7" QHD Super AMOLED display, with Gorilla Glass 5 protection, and curved edges, similar to those found on the Galaxy S7 Edge. It is powered by the Snapdragon 820 CPU, and offers 4GB of RAM, 64GB onboard storage and microSD expansion up to 256GB. It has a 3500mAh...
forum.xda-developers.com
Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 7
The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has a 5.7" QHD Super AMOLED display, with Gorilla Glass 5 protection. The display features curved edges, similar to the Galaxy S7 Edge. It is powered by the Snapdragon 820 CPU, and offers 4GB of RAM, 64GB internal storage and microSD expansion up to 256GB. The battery...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a rugged and robust version of the 2016 flagship Samsung Galaxy S7, with some improved hardware specifications. It features the same 5.1" QHD Super AMOLED display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 chipset, 32GB internal storage and 4GB of RAM, along with a microSD slot. On...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Note 7
The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 has a dual-curved screen, similar to the Galaxy S7 Edge, at 5.7" and QHD resolution with Gorilla Glass 5 protection. It is powered by the Snapdragon 820 CPU, or the Exynos 8890, and offers 4GB of RAM with a standard 64GB with microSD expansion up to 256GB. The battery...
forum.xda-developers.com
Verizon Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 was released in February 2016. It features a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, which has an "always on" function, used to display a clock and notifications. Under the hood, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either...
forum.xda-developers.com
T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, which features an "always on" function, used to display a clock and notifications. ON the inside, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either the Adreno 530 Mali-T880 MP12 GPU...
forum.xda-developers.com
AT&T Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 comes with a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, with an "always on" function, used to display a clock and notifications. On the inside, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either the Adreno 530 Mali-T880 MP12 GPU (both...
forum.xda-developers.com
Sprint Samsung Galaxy S7
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display, with an "always on" feature, used to display a clock and notifications. On the inside, the Galaxy S7 is powered by either a Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or Exynos 8890 processor, and either the Adreno 530 Mali-T880 MP12 GPU (both...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy J7
The Samsung Galaxy J7 is a mid-range Android smartphone. It features a 5.5" 720p Super AMOLED display. Under the hood sits a 1.5Ghz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 processor, 1.5GB of RAM and 16GB internal storage, which can be expanded with a microSD slot. The Samsung Galaxy J7 has a 13MP...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy E Series
The Samsung Galaxy E Series comprises the Samsung Galaxy E5 and Samsung Galaxy E7. Both mid-range devices were released in February 2015. The Galaxy E5 has a 5" 720p Super AMOLED display, 1.2GHz quad-core processor, 1.5GB RAM, 8MP rear camera and 5MP rear camera. The E7 has a 5.5" 720p Super...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830, S5830i, Ace II
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Tab 3
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 3, much like its predecessors, comes in three sizes, 7", 8" and 10". The 7" is powered by an Exonys 1.2GHz dual core processor, the 8" is powered by the Samsung Exonys 1.5GHz dual core processor and the 10.1" powered by a 1.6GHz dual core Atom processor. They run on 1GB...
forum.xda-developers.com
Samsung Galaxy Apollo (Galaxy 3 i5800)
The Samsung Galaxy Apollo, otherwise knows as the Samsung Galaxy 3, is a budget smartphone released in the summer of 2010. It has a 3.2" TFT LCD touchscreen, with a 240x400 display resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Apollo won bronze at the CNET Asia Reader's Choice Award for Best Entry-Level...
forum.xda-developers.com
Thanks!!
Thank you, guys. Here I thought this thread would wind up buried with little to no action... Damn glad I was wrong! Special tip o' the hat to @woodman for directing this issue to the appropriate person, and @MikeChannon for your swift response.
Alright, on to the list. These will be primarily Motorola devices. Is it enough to simply list the device as on the list or would it be easier to have a link to it? There is at least some comfort in that these are mostly huge lists now and won't be a common or frequent task, I'd hope.
Moto G Power
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g-power-2021.12069/
Moto G Stylus
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g-stylus-2021.12073/
Moto G Play
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g-play-2021.12067/
Moto G10
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g10.12105/
Moto G30
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g30.12107/
Moto G40
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g40.12237/
Moto G60
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-g60.12239/
Moto E
https://forum.xda-developers.com/f/moto-e-2020.12097/
Moto Z2 Force
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/moto-z2-force.6776/
Moto E3
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/moto-e3.5563/
Moto Droid Maxx
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/motorola-droid-maxx-2.4868/
Moto X Style (Pure Edition)
https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/moto-x-style-pure.4365/
A note on that last one, the X Style Pure. its got two listings in the device list, but the one that has the manufacturer info and graphic correctly filled in doesn't link to the device forum, as in it has no live link at all. Yet the other listing which clicks through to the device forum doesn't contain the mfc. info or the graphic.
woodman said:
@MikeChannon
Here is my first pass, OnePlus and Samsung.
My first "not specified" list:
.............................. trunc...............................
Thanks!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mario0318 said:
Thank you, guys. Here I thought this thread would wind up buried with little to no action... Damn glad I was wrong! Special tip o' the hat to @woodman for directing this issue to the appropriate person, and @MikeChannon for your swift response.
Alright, on to the list. These will be primarily Motorola devices. Is it enough to simply list the device as on the list or would it be easier to have a link to it? There is at least some comfort in that these are mostly huge lists now and won't be a common or frequent task, I'd hope.
.................... trunc ................................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hopefully these are added.
Mike
Thanks a lot @MikeChannon !
This is OK for OnePlus
But this one is still not specified for Samsung: https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/samsung-galaxy-s10e.8763/
woodman said:
Thanks a lot @MikeChannon !
This is OK for OnePlus
But this one is still not specified for Samsung: https://forum.xda-developers.com/c/samsung-galaxy-s10e.8763/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got it
Mike
{Mod edit: Quoted post has been removed}
Yes. That is what this thread is about.
Hi @MikeChannon,
hopefully this thread still functions as to request changes to the "Device Inventory" and your kind support.
The older "Samsung Galaxy S2" or "SII" (with several XDA forums) can be found two times as 1. "i9100" (add_device_id=61) without "Samsung" as manufacturer and as 2. "Samsung Galaxy S II" (add_device_id=60).
And I stumbled upon a strange error (" Oops! We broke the matrix. Someone call Neo! ") while adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra":
Adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20" via the search device link works. It is "add_device_id=1135", but I want to add "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra". The Ultra seems to be add_device_id=1136 (As device search link "+ Add device to inventory" contains.), which surprisingly does not work.
Could it be that, if a specific device (see "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra" or "Samsung Galaxy S II" above) is not (already) linked to a XDA forum, it will fail to be added to device inventory?
Thank you for your support.
Android_adr said:
Hi @MikeChannon,
hopefully this thread still functions as to request changes to the "Device Inventory" and your kind support.
The older "Samsung Galaxy S2" or "SII" (with several XDA forums) can be found two times as 1. "i9100" (add_device_id=61) without "Samsung" as manufacturer and as 2. "Samsung Galaxy S II" (add_device_id=60).
And I stumbled upon a strange error (" Oops! We broke the matrix. Someone call Neo! ") while adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra":
Adding a "Samsung Galaxy S20" via the search device link works. It is "add_device_id=1135", but I want to add "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra". The Ultra seems to be add_device_id=1136 (As device search link "+ Add device to inventory" contains.), which surprisingly does not work.
Could it be that, if a specific device (see "Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra" or "Samsung Galaxy S II" above) is not (already) linked to a XDA forum, it will fail to be added to device inventory?
Thank you for your support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi
Well the older devices werte a bit of a nightmare to add to the device inventory as there were so many variations, carriers etc. Not to mention that the device inventory is a custom add-on to our XenForo forum software and as a consequence isn't always easy to work with. For that reason I'm reluctant to change anything with the S2 / SII forums/device inventory.
For the much newer S20 Ultra what happened there is that originally there were separate forums for the S20 /\Ultra and plus versions. As these shared software it was decided to roll the forums together but clearly the device IDs were not merged.
Hopefully you can now add the Ultra version.
Mike
Hi @MikeChannon,
thank you. Yes, I now have just the whole device family (i.e. "Samsung Galaxy S20 / S20+ / S20 Ultra") in my inventory. Obviously, I initially didn't catch, that it is less a detailed device specification but a convient link to the related XDA forums.
As a small final cleanup, the single still existing "Samsung Galaxy S20+" would now also need its merger into the above mentioned device family/forum.
Thank you for your longstanding support.
Android_adr said:
Hi @MikeChannon,
thank you. Yes, I now have just the whole device family (i.e. "Samsung Galaxy S20 / S20+ / S20 Ultra") in my inventory. Obviously, I initially didn't catch, that it is less a detailed device specification but a convient link to the related XDA forums.
As a small final cleanup, the single still existing "Samsung Galaxy S20+" would now also need its merger into the above mentioned device family/forum.
Thank you for your longstanding support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it's more just a linking to the forum (if we have one) sort of thing. It's certainly not perfect as it does not allow adding devices for which we don't have a forum.
I removed the old broken link to the Samsung Galaxy S20+ so it can be added now but only as the group of: S20 / S20+ / S20 Ultra
Mike