Anyone knows which kernel is the best ( In terms of stability, battery life, and performance) for 5t as for 2019. So far I only experienced FrancoKernel, Blu_spark, Renderzenith. Based on my research and as I've talked to some people. Mostly they recommend Renderzernith kernel. Any recommendations?
VirginPancake said:
Anyone knows which kernel is the best ( In terms of stability, battery life, and performance) for 5t as for 2019. So far I only experienced FrancoKernel, Blu_spark, Renderzenith. Based on my research and as I've talked to some people. Mostly they recommend Renderzernith kernel. Any recommendations?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want best battery life than stock, if you want best performance than RenderZenieth, Franco not updated and have a wakelock that doesn't let device sleep, Blu spark is more laggy than stock kernel and doesn't even more battery life. Honestly kernel development is very slow now.
VirginPancake said:
Anyone knows which kernel is the best ( In terms of stability, battery life, and performance) for 5t as for 2019. So far I only experienced FrancoKernel, Blu_spark, Renderzenith. Based on my research and as I've talked to some people. Mostly they recommend Renderzernith kernel. Any recommendations?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Imho currently stock kernel is the best for me - all custom kernels seem to be problematic currently like frequencies locking up (cores not sleeping, clocking up or down).
perf kernel (aka stock). π-kernel was good for a while but development seems to have stopped for the time being. Hmp based kernels (e.g., π-kernel or SimpleGX) have given me better battery life and fewer lag issues than some of the EAS kernels (e.g., RenderZenith). Some people swear that EAS is better, but IMHO that only holds true if the rom has been optimized for it, which stock OOS has not.
Related
Just want to know why some of you use Faux kernel. It seems to be the most mentioned one , at least from what i've read so far.
On the latest base roms, is it more battery as well as performance efficient in your opinion? Any other reasons you use it?
I've only had faux kernel on my HoX for not even a day so far so it's hard for me to be the judge and i'm interested. Thanks
With Faux's kernel you'll have better performances than stock kernel, but stock has better stability and battery life.
It's because faux's kernel has the latest nVidia drivers for Tegra 3, as well as a GPU overclock for better gaming performance I've been using faux lately, and still testing battery usage on normal daily usage.
Hello
this thread is like a poll
this thread can be useful for ppl like me
i wanna know which custom rom+kernel combination (linOs/aosp based roms, treble rom, customized stock rom+ all kernels of our s9 including stock kernel), depending on each user, is better for a daily use.
so in your opinion ,
whats the the best rom+kernel that gives more than 5/6h of sot, without decreasing too much performance ?
whats the best rom+ kernel that gives an amazing performance and gives a new experience for the user?
whats the best rom+ kernel that gives more stability for the user (other than stock) and a balanced battery life+ performance ?
-Personally, im using stock brf8 with apkg kernel and the highest sot i got is 5h20min.
i hope all of you will interact with this thread, so as to give a better idea of s9 development
thank you.
From common opinion, which is the best custom kernel for battery life?
The likely consensus will probably be Flash kernel. However, Ex, Sultan, Snoke and Kirst are all very good as well. Hard to say until you try them
I second on flash kernel or ex
I don't believe any of the kernels provide much of a boost in battery life. Android has that down pretty well and there isn't much room for improvement. Now lots of good features add....they still do that.
They are all good on battery...try some and decide for yourself based on your set up and usage.
We have some good Kernels for our Whyred. What is the best in your opinion?
Someone looks for performance, balance and only battery backup. I think we dont have a definitive solution.
I'm looking for performance and I'm currently using Kangaroo 5.1 OC version and I get around 6 hrs of SoT, on 4G all the time and mostly indoor use.
Pavl79 said:
I'm looking for performance and I'm currently using Kangaroo 5.1 OC version and I get around 6 hrs of SoT, on 4G all the time and mostly indoor use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kangaroox OC is the best Kernel for performance I think.
Overally best is icecold. Also purecaf is a really great kernel
There is no best, best is always relative
This Post was sent from a Script by @baalajimaestro
Kangaroo non-oc version seems to heat my device up much more than purecaf when using hotspot. So I just use purecaf as it heats less and gives slightly more fluid ui in my experience.
Everyone of them makes camera not to work?
I've tried Illusion, Agni, PureCaf, IceCold, basically all the major kernels with HavocOS and so far the best one I've found is KangarooX. I don't game at all on my phone but I prefer a smooth experience in daily use and KangarooX delivers that. It's the most well balanced kernel I've ever come across. No twiddling or tweaking, it just works fluidly day in, day out. No sudden lags or freezes, apps open almost instantly, animations are fluid and battery backup is pretty amazing. Better than IceCold whilst offering far more stable experience.
samsarefin said:
I've tried Illusion, Agni, PureCaf, IceCold, basically all the major kernels with HavocOS and so far the best one I've found is KangarooX. I don't game at all on my phone but I prefer a smooth experience in daily use and KangarooX delivers that. It's the most well balanced kernel I've ever come across. No twiddling or tweaking, it just works fluidly day in, day out. No sudden lags or freezes, apps open almost instantly, animations are fluid and battery backup is pretty amazing. Better than IceCold whilst offering far more stable experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which is better OC or non.OC? And what about latest version 5.3? Is it good enough?
gl_k_ said:
Which is better OC or non.OC? And what about latest version 5.3? Is it good enough?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Non OC version and I've been using 5.3 since it came out. Smooth sailing so far.
Kernel for MIUI Pie?
Any kernel suggestion for MIUI Pie (xiaomi.eu)?
I unfortunately don't have time to test all of them, since I work with my phone.
I was looking for an Android 10 ROM, and I'm not strictly talking about stock Kernel. Custom Kernel is fine and welcome.
ROMs will give you pretty much the same battery life, if the kernel stays the same. So I'd suggest installing a Custom ROM of your preference and then install the smallest package of gapps. What you should be looking for is the kernel. Kernel is the part of the system that manages the conversation between hardware and software. Therefore try some Undervolted Kernels for battery life, these will decrease the performance of your device, but it will increase the battery life. As long as you're not playing graphic intensive games, you will not notice the difference. My suggestion would be to use "DragonHeart vx.x + U" kernel in the forum. It is undervolted, so the battery life will be much better than stock. Also keep away from unofficial, untrusted and Beta ROMs, if you want stability. Cheers.
EDIT: You can also flash the custom kernel on stock ROM if you want to have the least amount of hassle.