What I have to do to over clock my CPU from 1.8 Gz to 2.2Gz I'm on bootleggers unofficial ROM , any one who knows ?
Flash a kernel that supports overclocking. Then use an app of your choice to set the max frequency.
I assume you know the risk.
nyasaystheneko said:
Flash a kernel that supports overclocking. Then use an app of your choice to set the max frequency.
I assume you know the risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
InsigniuX kernel supports over clocking.
Rykywype said:
InsigniuX kernel supports over clocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no only kirks and twistloop. as far as i know.
No-Name kernel.
For miui 10 : Kirks kernel, KangarooX Kernel,Ancient Kernel
nakulp said:
For miui 10 : Kirks kernel, KangarooX Kernel,Ancient Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay thanks buddy u r great
Overclock your cpu and watch your device die faster due to overheating.
The Restless Soul said:
Overclock your cpu and watch your device die faster due to overheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faster as opposite to what..like 2 years vs 5 years? Haha!
Max thermals reach 46-48 which is only 2 or 3 degrees higher than stock & the temps/cpu clock anyway get limited by the thermal engine automatically after that.
nakulp said:
Faster as opposite to what..like 2 years vs 5 years? Haha!
Max thermals reach 46-48 which is only 2 or 3 degrees higher than stock & the temps/cpu clock anyway get limited by the thermal engine automatically after that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclock will affect battery performance
SunilSuni said:
Overclock will affect battery performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think he is aware of that
nakulp said:
Faster as opposite to what..like 2 years vs 5 years? Haha!
Max thermals reach 46-48 which is only 2 or 3 degrees higher than stock & the temps/cpu clock anyway get limited by the thermal engine automatically after that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends. If you do a full overclock you can risk killing your motherboard faster.
Slightly overclocks don't affect with nothing if the cpu temperature increases with 1-4°c.
Still, getting better cooling on your phone is a much better choice. Changing the thermal paste etc etc.
This is irrelevant to the op's request/question.
I dunno why a simple question thread couldn't be followed up by discussion of simple answers?
Look, It doesn't matter even if it destroys the phone cuz that's not the point of the thread but if you were insisting to be pedantic then that still could have been added in the end but only if you'd chosen to atleast answer something relevant at first = being relevant.
Ultimately these types of posts/replies are no different than spamming say a redmi forum with lenovo or iphone related questions..
Regardless of the above, oc on current kernels is not dangerous as such because there is no alteration/upping of voltages manually.
*** There is also a fixed "setpoint" of temperatures, frequencies,voltages etc in the inbuilt thermal engine profiles which no simple oc of frequencies is going to get past through unless one decides to disable it manually . If the temperatures reach even the lowest thresholds of preconfigured "high" levels then the chipset will start to downclock at once in fixed steppings***
Related
Hi, just wanted to know what is original HTC's ROM CPU scaling range and what is its CPU governor. My guess is 245-528, ondemand - is that correct?
Sorry, I don't know myself, but I'd like to know this too! I've just installed JokerDroid on mine, and I want to set it to stock frequencies so I can improve the battery life.
I'm using 352-691 ondemand, but I think 748 is ok too.
I think the min is 352MHz. But again, I am not so sure. (I arrived at this value when I was on the Stock ROM and used Android System Info which shows the various CPU frequencies and the time periods they operate on that frequency)
zigee said:
I'm using 352-691 ondemand, but I think 748 is ok too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't the max. for this device "528"
xXxeXtreme said:
Isn't the max. for this device "528"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom ROM's (Or, more appropriately - Custom Kernels) allow you to set a CPU Speed upto 768MHz.
BUT - The performance increase is not as great as the speed increase shows. So, if you do overclock, don't keep huge expectations.
zigee said:
I'm using 352-691 ondemand, but I think 748 is ok too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running on 710 max, some people run on 768 max. But apparantly it is phone related because some people can perfectly run on 768 whilst I read a few days ago from a person here whose wildfire started force closing things around 710 or one higher or so.
Try a bit yourself which works for you. There are benchmarks that you can let run to see how often an error will occur approximately I have no link myself but I know a bud of mine did that to try how high he could go
At 691, some apps force closed, so I'm back to 595. It was stable for me.
gues that the 352MHz is the stock minimum then. There should be a noticable battery life increase when 122MHz is my current IDLE clock huh?
Now Iam running 122-710MHz on stock HTC ROM, very stable. If I set the frequency above 710MHz the scaling become unstable uner LOAD sometimes and dropping to 480MHz.
Using jacob kernel v4.
Hi there, thinking about getting SetCPU - I have some questions before I do because I hear it can be dangerous?
- I've heard it can brick your phone?
- What if you set it too high?
- Do you personally have to monitor it?
- What are the benefits?
- Use alot of battery?
- Is it really worth using?
- Is it optimized for different phones - example the One X?
Thanks guys!
JDBurnie said:
Hi there, thinking about getting SetCPU - I have some questions before I do because I hear it can be dangerous?
- I've heard it can brick your phone?
- What if you set it too high?
- Do you personally have to monitor it?
- What are the benefits?
- Use alot of battery?
- Is it really worth using?
- Is it optimized for different phones - example the One X?
Thanks guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, i have read that SetCPU cannot view all the cores i have read alot saying that System Tuner works fine you might want to try that.
I used to use SetCPU on my sensation and never hand any issues with it i did not monitor the app at all
Benefits allows overclocking if available in kernel
it can be overclocked and cause some issues such as overheating but if set correctly will be fine doesnt use much battery if any
and no i dont think you can brick your phone
if you set it too high i believe i had to reflash rom nothing major
BTW this is based on my own knowledge and usage
Hope this helps
Thanks man
JDBurnie said:
Thanks man
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How much battery life can you save using setCPU?
lamenramen said:
How much battery life can you save using setCPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None in theory, if the CPU is slower it takes longer to go from
idle - process - idle
Faster speeds allow it to get it over and done with faster and get back to idle.
Of course it will at times stop the CPU going higher than it needs too which could save battery.
Under volting will save more batter then underclocking ever will.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
SetCPU can not see Tegra 3 yet
Use System Tuner and its free
hamdir said:
SetCPU can not see Tegra 3 yet
Use System Tuner and its free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I have system tuner, but what do I need to do in order to improve battery life?
I have set the governor to powersave. Is there anything else? How would I undervolt using this app?
lamenramen said:
Thanks. I have system tuner, but what do I need to do in order to improve battery life?
I have set the governor to powersave. Is there anything else? How would I undervolt using this app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
undervolting requires your phones kernel to support it, currently on these forums there is only one that does but i haven't tested it, sticking firm to the "stock kernel is best" and will do untill the kernels have more time to mature.
you could limit your max speed to 1 GHz, if you are rooted you can use Core control to turn off cores and run your phone as a dual core.
treebill said:
undervolting requires your phones kernel to support it, currently on these forums there is only one that does but i haven't tested it, sticking firm to the "stock kernel is best" and will do untill the kernels have more time to mature.
you could limit your max speed to 1 GHz, if you are rooted you can use Core control to turn off cores and run your phone as a dual core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be lazy, but would running the phone as dual core and limiting it to 1 ghz result in a perceptible battery savings? I'm trying to get a feel for how much I should expect custom ROMs to make my One X perform up to par. Thus far, I've installed two custom ROMs and felt like the improvements were all safely in the minor category.
I did install cyanogenmod 7 on a phone last year wow, that resulted in major benefits.
lamenramen said:
Not to be lazy, but would running the phone as dual core and limiting it to 1 ghz result in a perceptible battery savings? I'm trying to get a feel for how much I should expect custom ROMs to make my One X perform up to par. Thus far, I've installed two custom ROMs and felt like the improvements were all safely in the minor category.
I did install cyanogenmod 7 on a phone last year wow, that resulted in major benefits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running on 2 cores stops the phone from using and 2 cores uses less power then 4, playing games and using all cores is over kill 2 cores will run the game without lag use less power and make less heat.
You'll maybe get 10% from doing that but I haven't tested.
Really the only time any of this saves battery is during demanding programs, tegrea has a super low power companion core, for all your power saving needs.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
I tried conservative governor while downloading sd files for Nova3 gave execllent results
I strongly advice not to undervolt tegra3
t3 is not like any other chip and UV or OC should not be attempted
OC because the chip is already at the max of its thermals
UV for the same reason n might end up with problems like flicker
changing governors and UC should be enough
is it true that over-clocking can damage my phone??
I like it when it's fast enough to play any games but i'm a little worried that OC might damage my phone..
do you have any suggestion about the right minimum and maximum frequency??(sorry 4 my english)
deosantos said:
is it true that over-clocking can damage my phone??
I like it when it's fast enough to play any games but i'm a little worried that OC might damage my phone..
do you have any suggestion about the right minimum and maximum frequency??(sorry 4 my english)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it really depends, im using CM10 on 134-1024 Mhz. Most the games are smooth. Its safe to OC up to 1.4 GHz imo. 1.6 GHz and 1.8 GHz might damage over time and a lot of usage at max frequency
OC is always bad and dangerous, no matter what clocks you use.
Besides, OC doesn't give any major performance boost, you can barely see it.
Someguyfromhell said:
OC is always bad and dangerous, no matter what clocks you use.
Besides, OC doesn't give any major performance boost, you can barely see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To add on, constant OC = spoiling your phones.
僕のLT18iから送られてきた
TheHaso said:
it really depends, im using CM10 on 134-1024 Mhz. Most the games are smooth. Its safe to OC up to 1.4 GHz imo. 1.6 GHz and 1.8 GHz might damage over time and a lot of usage at max frequency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it's 100% safe if i OC it up to 1.4?
Someguyfromhell said:
OC is always bad and dangerous, no matter what clocks you use.
Besides, OC doesn't give any major performance boost, you can barely see it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh,so u mean OC is not that useful at all?should I just stay ay 1024 then?
Why bother overclocking something that is outdated specification wise? And with an single core, the performance boost is non-existant because the core will be driven hard and generate heat and voila.. RIP!
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
deosantos said:
oh,so u mean OC is not that useful at all?should I just stay ay 1024 then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just stick with device default, don't have to set CPU frequency
僕のLT18iから送られてきた
deosantos said:
oh,so u mean OC is not that useful at all?should I just stay ay 1024 then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use memory setting app from playstore without overclock cpu
well thanks for the reply,i'm new here so I don't know how to quote your replies yet..
one last question,,have you ever heard of somone who broke his/her phone because of overclocking???
deosantos said:
well thanks for the reply,i'm new here so I don't know how to quote your replies yet..
one last question,,have you ever heard of somone who broke his/her phone because of overclocking???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh yes, because phone cpu have bad support to overclock. Desktop pc more better, but this it's other story...
deosantos said:
well thanks for the reply,i'm new here so I don't know how to quote your replies yet..
one last question,,have you ever heard of somone who broke his/her phone because of overclocking???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a matter of hearing it from someone. It will definitely happen if you overclock your phone since increasing the maximum frequency from the design limit will fry your phone.
popthosegaskets said:
It's not a matter of hearing it from someone. It will definitely happen if you overclock your phone since increasing the maximum frequency from the design limit will fry your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh,ok..well i guess i shouldn't bother altering the frequency..thanks for the help.!!:laugh:
Hi guys,
I'm new to android and I just flash a cook rom with custom kernel to my phone.
I use Kernel Tweaker to set some variable to make it use less battery and smoothly but I see an option called Intelli-plug.
I google this and see it complete replacement for MP-decision.
So what is best of them for battery life and performance at cook rom?
(I think MP-decision is best for Stock rom, correct me if I am wrong )
Intelliplug is a replacement for mp decision implemented by faux123 if im not wrong . It determines the behaviour of the cpu and gpu. Stock nexus and OG only have mp decision. Intelliplug is a better option
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium HD app
mp-decision is better.
The only thing the Intelliplug do is causing lags, freezes and other annoying strange things.
imho.
There's also msm_mpdecision (not to be confused with the mpdecision binary) by showp1984, which is pretty good. It has input boost and is the smoothest I've tried. I'd give that a shot depending on what kernel you're running. In trickster, it'll be a menu in specific called MSM-MPDECISION control (or something like that). CPUQuiet is supposed to be good as well, but I haven't personally run it. Auto_hotplug and mako_hotplug in faux and matr1x are typically better for battery than others, but are not quite as smooth.
xboxfanj said:
There's also msm_mpdecision (not to be confused with the mpdecision binary) by showp1984, which is pretty good. It has input boost and is the smoothest I've tried. I'd give that a shot depending on what kernel you're running. In trickster, it'll be a menu in specific called MSM-MPDECISION control (or something like that). CPUQuiet is supposed to be good as well, but I haven't personally run it. Auto_hotplug and mako_hotplug in faux and matr1x are typically better for battery than others, but are not quite as smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanted to know wat type of decision is used in Nexus4 and 5....coz wen i compare OG nd MAKO using perfmon app i can able to find the difference.... And it looks lyk mako one ia bettr than ours...!!... Am i ryt...
Sent from my LG-E975 powering Stock 4.1.2
hasan4791 said:
I wanted to know wat type of decision is used in Nexus4 and 5....coz wen i compare OG nd MAKO using perfmon app i can able to find the difference.... And it looks lyk mako one ia bettr than ours...!!... Am i ryt...
Sent from my LG-E975 powering Stock 4.1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are comparing stock vs N4, yes, they are different; stock should actually be a bit better since Qualcomm doesn't include certain things on Nexus devices. On CM, the mpdecision binary used I believe is from N4 4.2.
Tim4 said:
mp-decision is better.
The only thing the Intelliplug do is causing lags, freezes and other annoying strange things.
imho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any evidence / proof of this "claim"?
Destroyedbeauty said:
Any evidence / proof of this "claim"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well he wrote "In my honest opinion" so i dont think any proof is needed
Sendt fra min LG-E975 med Tapatalk
Liindberg said:
Well he wrote "In my honest opinion" so i dont think any proof is needed
Sendt fra min LG-E975 med Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see anything that is making Qualcomm MP-Decision better than Faux123 custom Intelliplug driver His hotplug driver is everything that MP-Decision is lacking of + more battery friendly and less heat generating..
MPDecision is much more aggressive in terms of changing CPU frequency (automatically goes to 1026 when input is detected). IntelliPlug is more for battery than performance. For performance, I suggest MSM-MPDecision from showp1984 (it's on most of my kernels and a couple others), which performs similarly to the mpdecision binary in terms of boosting frequencies and raw performance, but is customizable. You can change the frequency for input boost or turn it off altogether. There's a bunch of different settings you can play around with.
CPUQuiet also is one of the better performing hotplug drivers. I don't know quite as much about how it works, but it was made by NVidia and ported to Snapdragon by maxwen and has a set of governors which keep the CPU running at optimal frequencies for battery and performance.
In my opinion Intelliplug is extremely finicky and unpredictable. I get much better battery life with mpdecision.
I am a little newbie on this, so may i ask a question?
How can i install MP-decision?
Is it built-in on a kernel or do i have to download it seperately?
any body can completely explain what relay MP-decision and Intelliplug do? or any body know where I can read complete documentation of those?
smart8bits said:
any body can completely explain what relay MP-decision and Intelliplug do? or any body know where I can read complete documentation of those?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google is your friend
http://androidmodguide.blogspot.ca/p/blog-page.html
MPdecision
Guys,
In my humble opinion what i have noticed is - when you enable a mpdecision i.e.on in the cpu, based on your cpu gov settings say for performance - one core of your cpu will always be at 100% and based on the activities it will switch on or off, the other cores.
When your cpu gov settings are interactively managed, again one of your core will be working and based on the certain % say 79 or 80,it will switch on the other cores.
If you deactivate mpdecision then almost all your cores will be active at any given time. But may not run as high as in enabled state.
So if you are one of those who cares about your cpu heating and don't use cpu tuners or sleepers. Set it off.
If you are into gaming and very smooth ui experience and doesn't bother about battery drain, switch it on.
I have enabled the settings and use custimized task scripts to reduce the frequency of the core as soon as i switch off the screen.
[email protected] said:
So if you are one of those who cares about your cpu heating and don't use cpu tuners or sleepers. Set it off.
If you are into gaming and very smooth ui experience and doesn't bother about battery drain, switch it on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
based on what you said on the rest of the post, shouldnt it be the opposite?
Which kernel is best for performance?(for Whyred)
1. Black box
2.no name
And many out there???
Suggestions please.
Thanks in advance.
Deep.cdy said:
Which kernel is best for performance?(for Whyred)
1. Black box
2.no name
And many out there???
Suggestions please.
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should try them and find out the most suitable for you, use them for 1-2 days, you'll see the difference.... personally, I'm using NoName kernel with RR
NoName for Lineage based.
Deep.cdy said:
Which kernel is best for performance?(for Whyred)
1. Black box
2.no name
And many out there???
Suggestions please.
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think currently is noname.
we hope a bunch of recognised developers in the near future as franco as many others.
Kirks, for battery...
Dude unlocked the lower cpu freqs...
m666p said:
Kirks, for battery...
Dude unlocked the lower cpu freqs...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It operates on lower Volts using this unlocked freqs?
peter-k said:
It operates on lower Volts using this unlocked freqs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
God knows, but what I do know is that it should produce less heat at the very least and it performs pretty gud on powersave governor. The gpu on the other hand is garbage at min freq (160mhz), even the launcher lags....
peter-k said:
NoName for Lineage based.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But after flashing no name 1.3 the WiFi doesn't work for me on rr 12th June
Deep.cdy said:
But after flashing no name 1.3 the WiFi doesn't work for me on rr 12th June
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine was fine but now I'm on Aosip.
i think for now the best is to use a stock kernel, be careful with the charging limits.
peter-k said:
It operates on lower Volts using this unlocked freqs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
m666p said:
God knows, but what I do know is that it should produce less heat at the very least and it performs pretty gud on powersave governor. The gpu on the other hand is garbage at min freq (160mhz), even the launcher lags....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it operates at lower voltage as it's a lower frequency and requires less power draw. Lower voltages should mean lower heat, however you don't magically get that lower freqs to operate, you need to tweak the interactive governor to make use of them all efficiently. So far I'm on Kirks kernel and AOSiP and it's a quite good combo.
The lag is not caused by low GPU freqs, it's because of low CPU freqs for that particular load, so governor tweaking is needed.
Cirra92 said:
Of course it operates at lower voltage as it's a lower frequency and requires less power draw. Lower voltages should mean lower heat, however you don't magically get that lower freqs to operate, you need to tweak the interactive governor to make use of them all efficiently. So far I'm on Kirks kernel and AOSiP and it's a quite good combo.
The lag is not caused by low GPU freqs, it's because of low CPU freqs for that particular load, so governor tweaking is needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I tested what you said out. Because you said it with such confidence...
I changed the cpu governor to performance and set the gpu to 160mhz max...
That made the experience a bit better but it would still lag a lot in recents and app launcher scrolling...
I've attached a screen shot to prove it too...
Another thing, just because the clock is lower does not mean that the voltage is lower as well, many devices that ive owned over the years have had the same voltage's for lower clocks( moto g2, Sony xperia z1)
And lastly, you should "magically" get those lower frequencies(if they are truly unlocked) since governors will always operate within the min/max frequencies that are set by the user or by default(unless it reverts parameters back to stock, like our device does on interactive)...
Forgot screenshot....
m666p said:
Lol, I tested what you said out. Because you said it with such confidence...
I changed the cpu governor to performance and set the gpu to 160mhz max...
That made the experience a bit better but it would still lag a lot in recents and app launcher scrolling...
I've attached a screen shot to prove it too...
Another thing, just because the clock is lower does not mean that the voltage is lower as well, many devices that ive owned over the years have had the same voltage's for lower clocks( moto g2, Sony xperia z1)
And lastly, you should "magically" get those lower frequencies(if they are truly unlocked) since governors will always operate within the min/max frequencies that are set by the user or by default(unless it reverts parameters back to stock, like our device does on interactive)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, we are talking here about difference in voltage between stock minimum freq for big cluster, which is 1.1ghz and actual possible minimum which is 300mhz, and there is a difference in voltage, that was the point. The devices I owned, S5 and Z3compact had more CPU steps, therefore the difference between some of the steps was really small or there wasn't any, but the CPU scaling made a jump to the freq with bigger difference (higher or lower, that was the stock behavior so some freqs weren't used). Here it might use all of the freq steps as there are less of them and the difference in voltage is significant enough, which might be the case, I said that because of my experience with previous devices. But you've missed the point anyway, I have said that even if unlocked, some freqs won't be used just because they are there if the governor parameters aren't set properly (or will be barely used). That was my point, I said that as a general note, so users won't jump the gun and blame devs for whatever.
And another one, regarding your test and lag with GPU, now I'm confused why would you set your max at 160mhz? I know it was for testing purposes in this case, but you did complain about it in original post and I said it won't lag because the max would still be set to 430mhz in which case the GPU freq scaling would do the job which it does very good so far. It would lag of course if you set max GPU freq to 160, but that's not what would you do for daily usage, right? Sorry if I misunderstood something.
Cirra92 said:
First of all, we are talking here about difference in voltage between stock minimum freq for big cluster, which is 1.1ghz and actual possible minimum which is 300mhz, and there is a difference in voltage, that was the point. The devices I owned, S5 and Z3compact had more CPU steps, therefore the difference between some of the steps was really small or there wasn't any, but the CPU scaling made a jump to the freq with bigger difference (higher or lower, that was the stock behavior so some freqs weren't used). Here it might use all of the freq steps as there are less of them and the difference in voltage is significant enough, which might be the case, I said that because of my experience with previous devices. But you've missed the point anyway, I have said that even if unlocked, some freqs won't be used just because they are there if the governor parameters aren't set properly (or will be barely used). That was my point, I said that as a general note, so users won't jump the gun and blame devs for whatever.
And another one, regarding your test and lag with GPU, now I'm confused why would you set your max at 160mhz? I know it was for testing purposes in this case, but you did complain about it in original post and I said it won't lag because the max would still be set to 430mhz in which case the GPU freq scaling would do the job which it does very good so far. It would lag of course if you set max GPU freq to 160, but that's not what would you do for daily usage, right? Sorry if I misunderstood something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kinda get what you mean, but the min freqs should kick in by default. They don't though on kirks, you need to change the governor to something like alucard or zzmove once before it actually starts clocking down to 300mhz...
On a side I would just disable the big. Cluster if I could, I don't really need that much cpu performance...
I was trying to find the min gpu freq that would be usable and I was disappointed, cuz my Sony z1 had a smooth ui experience with the gpu clocked at 200mhz max and that thing had a sd800...
Btw, I do all this to get better battery life...
I found out something else, I can't use power save governor any more because it can't handle audio processing(ainur, v4a) when the screen is off...
Just like my old z1, Lol...
Makes me think that the performance is really identical to the snapdragon 800...
I wonder how pissed I would be if a I got the redmi 5 plus, the 625 would have been even worse...
m666p said:
I kinda get what you mean, but the min freqs should kick in by default. They don't though on kirks, you need to change the governor to something like alucard or zzmove once before it actually starts clocking down to 300mhz...
On a side I would just disable the big. Cluster if I could, I don't really need that much cpu performance...
I was trying to find the min gpu freq that would be usable and I was disappointed, cuz my Sony z1 had a smooth ui experience with the gpu clocked at 200mhz max and that thing had a sd800...
Btw, I do all this to get better battery life...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
m666p said:
I found out something else, I can't use power save governor any more because it can't handle audio processing(ainur, v4a) when the screen is off...
Just like my old z1, Lol...
Makes me think that the performance is really identical to the snapdragon 800...
I wonder how pissed I would be if a I got the redmi 5 plus, the 625 would have been even worse...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I agree, it should, but how much it stays on minimum freq is dependent on couple of governor parameters (talking about interactive). On mine though it does stay on 300mhz when idling, on stock Kirks settings. Big cluster can be disabled through new hotplug solution, like Intelliplug, which I used on my old devices, and it performed great, 1 core was active when screen was off, screen on and light usage required only 2 cores, while all 4 were active under heavy load. Here however there is only Qualcomm's hotplug solution, until that changes, no luck. Regarding GPU freq, I don't think any device would work smoothly under 200mhz, you can set 266mhz here, it will be smooth, I've tested today, on my old SD801 it performed at 233mhz IIRC.
I've seen that, V4A requires higher freq than 300mhz, or even 422mhz which SD801 had, it's more about the freq rather than the chipset, as I've read on multiple threads that even the devices with SD820 were struggling a lot when processing audio at 300mhz when the screen was off. Don't worry, it's a general issue. There is also the optimization of the rom and audio mods as well, background tasks, kernel, it all goes into the mix.
This is actually a very good chipset, it's technically SD660 just with lower clocks on both CPU and GPU.
EDIT: I forgot, this is my usage on AOSiP + Kirks, stock interactive tunables, min freq 300mhz (big/little), GPU initial/min freq 160mhz, max 430mhz. Using microG instead off GApps, I have used FB, Instagram, Messenger app for 1,5h each, Viber was couple of hours, Chrome some 30mins, Panini sticker album 30+ minutes, 30 minutes of 2G calls. Network mode was LTE, though I was on wifi on whole charge.
Started measuring from 92%.
Thanks bro, that explains a lot...