I am just curious if anyone has tried undervolting yet. I would like to see how much battery life improved and how much heat output can be reduced from SD820.
r u using Stock or CM13, i am not sure if there is any kernel that can support that yet,
Well i will get my phone this Friday. I saw that lots of Roms are cumming out but its my mistake not checking if they have any under-volt support (my mistake sorry). As far as I saw non of the roms support undervolting yet.
It would be very interesting to see how far the phone can be pushed.
I am looking for a performance oriented (Zero lag in UI navigation and scrolling) kernel, I don't care about battery life. Can you guys help me out?
Thanks in advance
IPhone 7 if u want Smoothness and less lag, overtime Android OS on any phone is going to eventually lag, u can try EX kernel or blu_spark and use AKT 1.4 and use performance, u may want to read up on different profiles to fit ur preference also too there are some build.prop mods to get good scrolling too
I like these build.prop modswindowsmgr.max_events_per_sec=500
ro.max.fling_velocity=20000
ro.min.fling_velocity=18000
Wtf is this post with iPhone, you brain lag for sure mate, change it ASAP. I don't have any lags even with stock kernel. What lags are you talking about?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using XDA-Developers Legacy app
If you want zero lag go for a kernal with touchboost. Franco has this nicely configured.
ElementalX overclocked and running in performance mode. Also the ROM will have something to do with the performance so maybe look into a good one. I personally cant recommend enough Resurrection Remix N.
Blu_spark with Fastlane enabled. Nothing compares if you want pure speed. Benefit is that battery life doesn't take a big hit unlike AKT 1.4 performance profiles which destroy your battery life but do offer great performance.
Xceed kernel is the best when it comes to overclocking and performance.
I see these terms a lot when kernels are being discussed to save battery life, can these two be used together? What are the differences? Thanks in advance for any information.
slamdunksaliby said:
I see these terms a lot when kernels are being discussed to save battery life, can these two be used together? What are the differences? Thanks in advance for any information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You really can't compare these to but.
AKT basically is changing kernel tunables in such matter that it saves battery or increases peformance depending on which the profile is ment for.. The problem is that everyone has a different usage pattern and everyone's definition of smooth and battery is different... For some Project Zhana can be really efficient and smooth while for me it is efficient/battery friendly but not as smooth.
EAS basically replaces the whole HMP part which almost every device runs now (HMP). EAS is quite new and quite experimental but really stable, you really won't notice it is experimental. EAS is a bit hard to explain for me. But if you are looking for a good user experience and the best battery life with it I would suggest you trying VertexOS.
Now correct me if I'm wrong I'm not a ****ing genius at this!
Puddi_Puddin said:
You really can't compare these to but.
AKT basically is changing kernel tunables in such matter that it saves battery or increases peformance depending on which the profile is ment for.. The problem is that everyone has a different usage pattern and everyone's definition of smooth and battery is different... For some Project Zhana can be really efficient and smooth while for me it is efficient/battery friendly but not as smooth.
EAS basically replaces the whole HMP part which almost every device runs now (HMP). EAS is quite new and quite experimental but really stable, you really won't notice it is experimental. EAS is a bit hard to explain for me. But if you are looking for a good user experience and the best battery life with it I would suggest you trying VertexOS.
Now correct me if I'm wrong I'm not a ****ing genius at this!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome! Thank you very much for the info, I understand it much better now
In my experience, I get better battery life a balanced profile on AKT (fusion balanced) on OOS. But performance is amazing on Vertex! And battery life isn't terrible, although not as good as on OOS, and it is still very usable.
Generalboii said:
In my experience, I get better battery life a balanced profile on AKT (fusion balanced) on OOS. But performance is amazing on Vertex! And battery life isn't terrible, although not as good as on OOS, and it is still very usable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the insight! I currently have the official Resurrection Remix ROM for my 3T with the latest EX kernel. Battery has been inconsistent for me even with the Wakelocks blocked and a mainly black theme, but I think it has to do with the weaker signal as opposed to OOS. I assume there is a way to apply these AKT profiles in the EX kernel app and have them apply after every reboot? I would prefer to stay with Ressurection over Vertex because it already has almost every feature available, and it would be much more convenient than flashing a different ROM each time for a new feature I wanted lol (since there is no Xposed for nougat)
Generalboii said:
In my experience, I get better battery life a balanced profile on AKT (fusion balanced) on OOS. But performance is amazing on Vertex! And battery life isn't terrible, although not as good as on OOS, and it is still very usable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't terrible? It's much better....Better battery than oos or any other nonEAS rom...try it your self...give the battery three charging cycles and enjoy.....
slamdunksaliby said:
I see these terms a lot when kernels are being discussed to save battery life, can these two be used together? What are the differences? Thanks in advance for any information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=72178689&postcount=4050
See the link posted by @juliusedward.
ELI5: Basically, EAS and HMP are way to manage tasks in a multi-core processor. HMP requires a lot a guess work and experience to get it right. EAS is, Well, smart! It gets cpu utilization and load information using WALT/PELT (it's a new topic entirely. Think of them like a function, which they honestly are.) and decides which core is perfectly suited for the current given task and at what frequency. So, it is in it's nature to be more efficient and more battery friendly. Although, through lots of tweaking and optimization in HMP kernels it's not that bad either.
I run VertexOS.
EAS seems offer better battery life, same smoothness, and less warm !
---------- Post added at 11:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:51 AM ----------
ahepas said:
Isn't terrible? It's much better....Better battery than oos or any other nonEAS rom...try it your self...give the battery three charging cycles and enjoy.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed !
slamdunksaliby said:
Thanks for the insight! I currently have the official Resurrection Remix ROM for my 3T with the latest EX kernel. Battery has been inconsistent for me even with the Wakelocks blocked and a mainly black theme, but I think it has to do with the weaker signal as opposed to OOS. I assume there is a way to apply these AKT profiles in the EX kernel app and have them apply after every reboot? I would prefer to stay with Ressurection over Vertex because it already has almost every feature available, and it would be much more convenient than flashing a different ROM each time for a new feature I wanted lol (since there is no Xposed for nougat)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Blu spark kernel. It's my favorite kernel in terms of performance and battery life. I can get 6-7hrs screen on time consistently over 24 hours on LTE and wifi. Performance is butter smooth. And when I mean butter smooth, I mean no frame drops, no microstutters, pure 60fps smoothness. Something not a single AKT profile can provide without destroying the battery life so I wouldn't recommend them, and yes I've tried every single profile. FlashKernel is also a really nice kernel but you need to tweak the stock governor settings to get nice performance.
Haven't tried EAS, but supposedly it does its job well, very well so you can also try that out. Try vertex it has been getting high praises.
@slamdunksaliby
Please check this post here
I think it is safe to presume that it answers your question to a great considerable extent.
Hope it helps.
-TDK
P.S. AKT profiles cannot be applied on EAS, not yet.
crzykiller said:
Try Blu spark kernel. It's my favorite kernel in terms of performance and battery life. I can get 6-7hrs screen on time consistently over 24 hours on LTE and wifi. Performance is butter smooth. And when I mean butter smooth, I mean no frame drops, no microstutters, pure 60fps smoothness. Something not a single AKT profile can provide without destroying the battery life so I wouldn't recommend them, and yes I've tried every single profile. FlashKernel is also a really nice kernel but you need to tweak the stock governor settings to get nice performance.
Haven't tried EAS, but supposedly it does its job well, very well so you can also try that out. Try vertex it has been getting high praises.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi I tried Blu spark for a little on sultanized resurrection remix ROM, and the battery life doesn't seem to be very good, specifically with standby as sultan's kernel seems to handle it better, are you using the stock settings or are you underclocking? What ROM are you using with the kernel? Thanks!
slamdunksaliby said:
Hi I tried Blu spark for a little on sultanized resurrection remix ROM, and the battery life doesn't seem to be very good, specifically with standby as sultan's kernel seems to handle it better, are you using the stock settings or are you underclocking? What ROM are you using with the kernel? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well u never going to have good battery life with RR. Try another rom and u going to see better battery stats.
slamdunksaliby said:
Hi I tried Blu spark for a little on sultanized resurrection remix ROM, and the battery life doesn't seem to be very good, specifically with standby as sultan's kernel seems to handle it better, are you using the stock settings or are you underclocking? What ROM are you using with the kernel? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont blame the kernel if you have standby drain.
I also use bluspark with freedomos ce and i nearly have zero battery drain over night.
If you have too much standby drain its some third party apps, services or something that keeps your phone awake.
MarcTremonti said:
Dont blame the kernel if you have standby drain.
I also use bluspark with freedomos ce and i nearly have zero battery drain over night.
If you have too much standby drain its some third party apps, services or something that keeps your phone awake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You won't see much difference between kernels regarding idle drain. It's 99% apps related.
Puddi_Puddin said:
You won't see much difference between kernels regarding idle drain. It's 99% apps related.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what i was trying to say
I've compiled Resurrection Remix with over clocked CPU (@2.2ghz) and GPU (@800mhz) and it's not that much of an improvement. I'd say PUBG runs little better now and some improvement in benchmarks. Well, I wasn't expecting miracles either but let me know if anyone wants an over clocked ROM or kernel. I am trying to add exfat support (I'd be happy if any devs can help me with that) as many user wants but I'm getting nowhere for now.
I can even take it to next level with CPU @2.4ghz and GPU @850mhz but I think that would be overkill.
I'm interested
How is the battery life?
Pitagoras2000 said:
I'm interested
How is the battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's little less than the stock ROM but now it depletes faster while gaming (as gaming pushes all cores to max).
Manish355 said:
I think it's little less than the stock ROM but now it depletes faster while gaming (as gaming pushes all cores to max).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice. That kernel would be great to VR
Well , good idea is to make only OC kernel and then setup it via kerenel audiutor eg. -- OC @ gpu would be nice because it is weakest part of MZP . I've just made benchmark on stock oreo antutu 7.1.3 = 75716 pts. while on latest Cosmos 3.2 rom result was 81703 pts.
i would be interested in a undervolting one
JonasVFC said:
i would be interested in a undervolting one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, that would be interested. I was playing wirh that, I think it was, Atrix time... Don't expect miracles but could add a bit to battery life. And a bit more in freezing the phone or crashing the apps
Sent from my XT1635-02 using Tapatalk
Zeljko1234 said:
Yeah, that would be interested. I was playing wirh that, I think it was, Atrix time... Don't expect miracles but could add a bit to battery life. And a bit more in freezing the phone or crashing the apps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Under volting is not a good idea, it creates a lot of issues. To increase battery life use smart pixels, build prop tweaks and also amplify and greenify. However for screen on time, lowering resolution and smart pixels are best options.
sebx_g1 said:
Well , good idea is to make only OC kernel and then setup it via kerenel audiutor eg. -- OC @ gpu would be nice because it is weakest part of MZP . I've just made benchmark on stock oreo antutu 7.1.3 = 75716 pts. while on latest Cosmos 3.2 rom result was 81703 pts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, nice idea
I think stock runs on 8.0 while Cosmos on 8.1 so that might've improved it somewhat,
I wish if there was some tweak to OC GPU of normal ROM.
Manish355 said:
I've compiled Resurrection Remix with over clocked CPU (@2.2ghz) and GPU (@800mhz) and it's not that much of an improvement. I'd say PUBG runs little better now and some improvement in benchmarks. Well, I wasn't expecting miracles either but let me know if anyone wants an over clocked ROM or kernel. I am trying to add exfat support (I'd be happy if any devs can help me with that) as many user wants but I'm getting nowhere for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think a kernel with overclocking possibilities would be nice. In fact, what I would really love was to see a port of Elemental X or Blu Spark kernels.