Related
This Qur'an Viewer was developed for my own use and will be invaluable to anyone who has memorised the Quran and wants to view two-pages at once so that it looks very similar to the mushaf.
Two types of Indo-Pak script are available, as well as two types of Uthmani script.
WVGA (800x480) resolution is an absolute necessity to run this application, any higher or lower resolution will probably not work properly and has not been tested.
You may find the size of the script is a little small, but as a Hafiz I find it invaluable as a quick reference when out and about.
You can click the page to move next/previous. You can also click the upper part of the page to go next/previous juz or surah.
You can choose from three bookmark positions, which will automatically remember your page position on each of the three virtual bookmarks.
Download it here. Unzip and see readme.txt for full installation instructions:
http://www.acclaimit.co.uk/downloads/HolyQuranWVGA_Release_20091001.zip
*** Please completely uninstall the previous Quran13Line application if you installed it before. This new application uses all new script images and a different folder structure. ***
Screenshots attached.
Jazzak Allah Khair
Could you please tell me which screen resolutions are compatible ?
qvga,vga,wqvga,wvga ???
Thank you
I'm sorry, WVGA (800x480) resolution is an absolute necessity to run this application, any higher or lower resolution will not work and has not been tested.
Thank you very much
DOWNLOADED AND INSTALLED
It is wonderful !
But could we get better Pictures ? with better script ?
Jazak-Allah, I'm glad it works. I tried my best to make the pictures look good using the 480 pixels page height so that we can fit two pages on-screen at a time. It's not going to be possible to make it any better unless we have more pixels to play with, or do you have any alternative ideas?
What do you mean by better script? Which part of the script are you having difficulty with exactly?
Thanx for your reply
I meant a different set of pictures, even the 15 line ones
attached are two samples (Zipped with WinZip)
and if you like, I can guide you to the link where you will be able to download the whole set of the first or the second sample.
Thanx again
I see. You forgot the attachments.
Please let me know the link to the whole sets of any other images you know of and I'll see what I can do... 15 or other lined ones, but I will have to rename the application too
I've resized the sample images to 480-pixel height. See attached.
I think the script on these images is much finer than the 13-line ones and is unreadable with two pages on-screen at a time. It would make more sense to show a full page at a time for the 15-line ones, which does not quite fit with the original design goal of this application.
I guess the answer would be to create a new application called "Quran15Line" showing one page at a time, but I am not sure how many people would be interested in this. Poll?
So? have you checked the samples ?
I guess the images without the frames can be visualised better especially when two of them are joined together on a horizontal WVGA screen, right ?
waiting for your reply
Well, as I have mentioned in my previous post, ( sorry just seen ur answer ), the ones without the frame are better.
Regarding your suggestion of the "Single Page", I don't think too many people will be interested in it since the images are originally taken from a software with a single page, full screen style.
These are the links to the 'non frame images' try them and give me your feedback ( Horizontal and Vertical )
http://www.4shared.com/file/96364556/390c2fa6/v_wvga.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/97539687/b3476020/h_wvga.html
Thanx again
Ahh, about your attachment, in fact they both seem readable ! and do not forget that this software is intended for a 'two page style' which means that it is obviously with smaller pages.
I am so interested in the new images !
hope you can make them.
and regarding the software, you can change the options in the TOOLS key, to 13 lines ( your old images ) and 15 lines ( my suggested images ) !
What do you think ???
Jazakhallah Khair Brother Ashiq
Inshallah you will receive Sadqah Jariya every time i use it
this is what i have been looking for for ages
if you do update it can you consider a transalation in english which corresponds to same
13 line quran if possible,maybe i am asking too much
but thanks anyway
Salaams
I was already considering English translation which should correspond with the script. However, it will take a while to do this because there are so many English translations and because we have tell the application which aayaat are on each page so that they can be matched up to the translation. It may take a few weeks, but Insha-Allah I will work on it during any spare time I have.
jaguaralani said:
These are the links to the 'non frame images' try them and give me your feedback ( Horizontal and Vertical )
http://www.4shared.com/file/96364556/390c2fa6/v_wvga.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/97539687/b3476020/h_wvga.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bro what difference with this?
Code:
http://www.4shared.com/file/134351630/60362269/h_wvga-800x480-medina2.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134114828/f2fe41e9/v_wvga-480x800-medina2.html
thanks bro
we need another resolutions plz
thanks alot
there is a collection of indopak script at pdaquran .com
which is clearer to read as it is a page per screen
wonder if you you could use the images in you excellent software
ibrahimh said:
there is a collection of indopak script at pdaquran .com
which is clearer to read as it is a page per screen
wonder if you you could use the images in you excellent software
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This application is designed for WVGA to show two pages per screen, so unfortunately I cannot use the pdaquran images. I would urge you to contact pdaquran and ask them to provide you with a Windows Mobile application (they already provide an iPhone one). In any case, couldn't you just download the PDF and view it using Adobe Reader one page at a time?
Dear monzoyt and all - thank you for the various uthmani images you sent - I am currently preparing the Uthmani/Madinah images and will release a new application within a few days InshaAllah.
It takes a while because I have cropped the images to maintain high quality after resizing and need to also match up the bookmarks to the page numbers, and also need to render the page numbers in arabic on the page sides due to the fact that the images do not have enough space to render the page numbers at the top.
monyozt said:
bro what difference with this?
Code:
http://www.4shared.com/file/134351630/60362269/h_wvga-800x480-medina2.html
http://www.4shared.com/file/134114828/f2fe41e9/v_wvga- -medina2.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
800x480 and 480x800, landscape and portrait screen mode!
Hey,
If you open up picture hub and zoom into a picture you'll see that after about 0,5 sec the pictures gets sharper.
Means MS uses a preview pic with less pixels and plus compression in the standard view to ensure a smooth run time. The main the problem is that the preview picture is such visible blury and compressed, it hurts my eyes everytime I launch picturehub. So I did some research and found some interesting registry entries.
10$ via paypal goes to the first one fixing it.
Regards.
I see what your saying but mine look just fine after zooming in about a second or less on my Focus. If yours is that bad where its hurting your eyes (I know its a figure of speech), I would think there is something wrong with your phone itself. Like I said, the pics on my phone look good even after zooming in.
wsantiagow said:
I see what your saying but mine look just fine after zooming in about a second or less on my Focus. If yours is that bad where its hurting your eyes (I know its a figure of speech), I would think there is something wrong with your phone itself. Like I said, the pics on my phone look good even after zooming in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I didn't pronounced it correctly: If I zoom into pictures, they are fine and sharp. It's just that the fullscreen picture (without zoom) looks blurred. It's not that distracting (mostly you do not notice it) if you do not know the picture well, but due the fact that I am a Designer/Photographer the slight blur at my pictures at no zoom is parasitic.
You just have to prevent the phone from doing compressed cache images.
Regards.
MarysFetus said:
So I did some research and found some interesting registry entries.
10$ via paypal goes to the first one fixing it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, you are running the quiz? I mean are you already knew the corresponding registry values?..
sensboston said:
So, you are running the quiz? I mean are you already knew the corresponding registry values?..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mmhh, not really. I found some eventual responsible values, but I am not in the position to do further research. Just search for image or jpeg in a registry editor. There are too many keys to list them all.
MarysFetus said:
mmhh, not really. I found some eventual responsible values, but I am not in the position to do further research. Just search for image or jpeg in a registry editor. There are too many keys to list them all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, all jpeg processing is done by native (arm) WP7 program called PhotoViewer. I don't think there is an option to change the jpeg loading mode. I'm afraid it's hardcoded in PhotoViewer.
sensboston said:
Actually, all jpeg processing is done by native (arm) WP7 program called PhotoViewer. I don't think there is an option to change the jpeg loading mode. I'm afraid it's hardcoded in PhotoViewer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I have to at least try changing the keys.
I'll post if I find something.
So that's the keys I mentioned: (click to enlarge)
I have an issue with photos taken in dark conditions, they are all messed up, or broken if you will, looking like corrupted JPG. In slightly better light conditions everything is fine. Reboot did not help. It happens now with default camera in sebaastian15's AIO 2.5 but I have also noticed it in AIO 2.2. Is there a way to upgrade/replace stock (sense 3.5) camera? Did anyone experienced such an issue?
I could insert image of screwed up photo but "noobs" like me have no access rights, so to look at it, make up and URL from this "img43.imageshack.us/img43/3977/imag0616d.jpg" or that one "img838.imageshack.us/img838/5885/imag0610g.jpg".
Also do not ask me to ask this question on the ROM thread... again, I am just a dumb "noob" so I cannot comment on super-duper-exclusive dev threads.
-andy.
jedreg said:
...make up and URL from this "img43.imageshack.us/img43/3977/imag0616d.jpg" or that one "img838.imageshack.us/img838/5885/imag0610g.jpg".
-andy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to see these images.
same here
the same happened with me too
but on older versions of runnymede and runnymedemod007
mine even used to restart the whole phone
i suggest using market apps like camera 360 or others if you prefer
I was trying to avoid non-sense (hehe) cameras, but I will give it a try to be able to take night picture despite low quality... what I have noticed (but have to prove tonight) is that after I changed preferred ISO to 800 the picture taken is ok, and even when I set it back to "auto" - this sounds like ISO property is not really set and may mess up when pixel brightness computation in low light conditions (just a theorem).
ckpv5, I copied&pasted address to URL bar of web browser and it works for me, maybe you do not have access to imageshack server. When I reach "10 mails level" I will just embed it here.
-andy.
jedreg said:
ckpv5, I copied&pasted address to URL bar of web browser and it works for me, maybe you do not have access to imageshack server. When I reach "10 mails level" I will just embed it here.
-andy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah.. I guess it is no access as this is what I got http://imageshack.us/img/blocked_login.jpg
Anyway... your workaround on the problem is good.
Night test done... default camera screws up pictures unless you manually set ISO. Re-checking "auto" does not help, but setting 400 or 800 helped me to make couple souvenir pictures.
-andy.
Hi! I'm ertha from BKK and now i'm investing on one application. To start with, i'm not developer myself, so some of my vocab might look silly or may not sound right for developer (maybe) so i apologize for that
Now i'm struggling with my apps development, since the agreement i've made is that i'll responsible for the design and images for every stage in game, i'm facing the difficulty for the images optimization.
For the original images, they are downloaded from my account in ShutterStock (biggest quality) i have 2 of them for each stages (2 different images).
Then i use "tinypng" converter in website to reduce their size in order to optimize my application size. However the size is still too big (according to developer) he's looking for something smaller?
Do you have any suggestion to "optimize these images" that are already converted by "tinypng" ? My developer tell me some method like save it to jpg first and then convert it back to png? is that a really good idea?
Really thank you for every answer, i truly appreciate all the help coming here
ertha013 said:
Hi! I'm ertha from BKK and now i'm investing on one application. To start with, i'm not developer myself, so some of my vocab might look silly or may not sound right for developer (maybe) so i apologize for that
Now i'm struggling with my apps development, since the agreement i've made is that i'll responsible for the design and images for every stage in game, i'm facing the difficulty for the images optimization.
For the original images, they are downloaded from my account in ShutterStock (biggest quality) i have 2 of them for each stages (2 different images).
Then i use "tinypng" converter in website to reduce their size in order to optimize my application size. However the size is still too big (according to developer) he's looking for something smaller?
Do you have any suggestion to "optimize these images" that are already converted by "tinypng" ? My developer tell me some method like save it to jpg first and then convert it back to png? is that a really good idea?
Really thank you for every answer, i truly appreciate all the help coming here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey there, Ertha.
I'll tell you the way I optimize images and see if this may help you.
When you save a .png, it saves uncompressed(or very little) which means your data is pixel-for-pixel. Highest quality you can reach.
When you save it as a .jpeg, it runs an algorithm and compresses what you have thus making the file size smaller, yet still producing a clear image.
So in essence, his theory will work, and you can tell him you did exactly that. Pretty much all mobile platforms will handle a .jpeg as well so my recommendation would be to tell the dev to use them.
I use Photoshop for my image compression. When I have the image I'd like open in Photoshop, I choose "save for Web and Devices" which will give you an optimization screen. Most of the time you can still get a really good image if you save as a jpeg and reduce the quality to 60%. This will greatly lower the file size and garner the "optimization" he is looking for.
A further recommendation would be to use 1:1 aspect ratio(square) images to optimize across devices if you're new to it. It will make life much easier later on.
Thank you so much Im Saint!
So i can save for web to "jpg" first and then save back to "png" again?
ertha013 said:
Thank you so much Im Saint!
So i can save for web to "jpg" first and then save back to "png" again?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you can do that. :good:
These past few days I was looking for XML for Hypercam that I like, I'm kind of picky and I didn't find a 100% that would fit me in everything like day/night, so I took a little bit of each of the best XML I've ever used and assembled a , I present to you "Murphy"
first, I created it especially for Mi A3, if you have Mi8 or Pocophone you will need to change Hypercam patch tab (so before you change XML, go to that tab and print it so that after restoring Murphy you do this change), preferably use Hypercam E3!
is divided into 2 files, XML and TXT
XML you put in GCam/Configs folder and TXT you put in GCam/Lib folder
I recommend moving TXT first and then moving XML and then logging into Hypercam E3 and restoring it
Murphy.txt was sent to me by Telegram and consequently lost the original name and came as 362836276.txt, it is from a Russian man, if he acknowledges contact me and I change the name and give you the credits!
https://gcambrasil.com.br/dev/hypercam-app
sorry for the bad english, Google Translate fault updated XML on 01/19/2020
great results tonight, same as stock at 48 this is the best gcam so far
Any photo samples? I tried and in daylight conditions resulting photos are slightly underexposed.
qwertysmerty said:
Any photo samples? I tried and in daylight conditions resulting photos are slightly underexposed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only have these on the device for now
Hello.
Noob question, but I can't seem to find the setting to change lib? A little help would be appreciated
bibekmufc said:
Hello.
Noob question, but I can't seem to find the setting to change lib? A little help would be appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XML is already set to automatically restore Lib, just move everything to the right place!
If you don't mind me saying, of all the gcam ports I have tried,Urnyx's latest 7.2 port with Urnyx's optimized mi a3 xml file- is the best. And the closest competitor in my opinion is Hypercam R6 with Prime Exclusive xml from Profilecam app. now, what i prefer
in urnyx's port is the size of the pic. In urnyx, i get the pic in half the size of Hypercam pic while maintaining same quality. But, I haven't compared the pics in PC so can't say if quality is reduced in bigger screen. But, in the phone screen, Urnyx's smaller sized photo looks as good as Hypercam.
@LzDoBeaTs - thanks for sharing the profile. I quickly compared photos in overcast daylight and with Hypercam E3 it really provides very nice photos. A bit over-sharpened, but still good. Colors are closely matching stock camera. Now I need to wait for the night and sunny weather for further testing. But it looks really promising Maybe we finally have a competitor for stock app.
---------- Post added at 10:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 AM ----------
Abujaherbadal said:
If you don't mind me saying, of all the gcam ports I have tried,Urnyx's latest 7.2 port with Urnyx's optimized mi a3 xml file- is the best. And the closest competitor in my opinion is Hypercam R6 with Prime Exclusive xml from Profilecam app. now, what i prefer
in urnyx's port is the size of the pic. In urnyx, i get the pic in half the size of Hypercam pic while maintaining same quality. But, I haven't compared the pics in PC so can't say if quality is reduced in bigger screen. But, in the phone screen, Urnyx's smaller sized photo looks as good as Hypercam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must have eagle eyes to see differences on the 720p OLED screen. In my experience, low res screen and punchy OLED colors make pretty much any photo good looking. But as soon as they're viewed on a PC, the real quality shows up and the differences between various settings and apps are often very obvious. Other times differences are subtle (yet important) and next to impossible to see on a mobile phone - photos must be zoomed in and placed side by side to really see what's different.
Abujaherbadal said:
If you don't mind me saying, of all the gcam ports I have tried,Urnyx's latest 7.2 port with Urnyx's optimized mi a3 xml file- is the best. And the closest competitor in my opinion is Hypercam R6 with Prime Exclusive xml from Profilecam app. now, what i prefer
in urnyx's port is the size of the pic. In urnyx, i get the pic in half the size of Hypercam pic while maintaining same quality. But, I haven't compared the pics in PC so can't say if quality is reduced in bigger screen. But, in the phone screen, Urnyx's smaller sized photo looks as good as Hypercam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't liked any GCam 7.2 photo results yet, only for night mode. About Hypercam R6 a friend said that it really is better than E3, today I do the tests and if I realize the difference, I update the post
XML is updated
Still quite dark and a bit oversaturated outdoor photos for my taste, sky is blueish than it really is and grass is greener than it really is.
I was using HyperCam R6. I'll try to make a set of samples stock vs HyperCam (Murphy profile) this week.
updated
LzDoBeaTs said:
These past few days I was looking for XML for Hypercam that I like, I'm kind of picky and I didn't find a 100% that would fit me in everything like day/night, so I took a little bit of each of the best XML I've ever used and assembled a , I present to you "Murphy"
first, I created it especially for Mi A3, if you have Mi8 or Pocophone you will need to change Hypercam patch tab (so before you change XML, go to that tab and print it so that after restoring Murphy you do this change), preferably use Hypercam E3!
is divided into 2 files, XML and TXT
XML you put in GCam/Configs folder and TXT you put in GCam/Lib folder
I recommend moving TXT first and then moving XML and then logging into Hypercam E3 and restoring it
Murphy.txt was sent to me by Telegram and consequently lost the original name and came as 362836276.txt, it is from a Russian man, if he acknowledges contact me and I change the name and give you the credits!
https://gcambrasil.com.br/dev/hypercam-app
sorry for the bad english, Google Translate fault updated XML on 01/19/2020
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you download the two files? They just open in a new tab
alexmason90 said:
How do you download the two files? They just open in a new tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As you did not write where and how are you trying to download them, there is no precise answer.
General ideas:
- click on the link, file loads in a new tab, right click, save as
- click on the link, file loads in a new tab, select all text, copy, create a new file, paste, save
- click on the link in Tapatalk, it will save files automatically
- click on QR code and scan it
- click on the link, copy URL name from the new tab, use CURL command line utility to download the file
- take a screenshot/photo and use OCR to convert images to text
Astrophotography
FYI I'm using Camera_7.2.014.278150624.apk for Astrophotography and images are in attachment!
Hope you like them.
Rom: MIUI 11 (you can find the rom in roms section and the rom does not matter!)
Gcam: https://forum.xda-developers.com/mi-...-t3979169/amp/
Some of photos edited with technics in photoshop you can learn in youtube!
pictures taken with stock camera at 48mpx are better than gcam marphy i have many examples, here is just one so it's not good yet
Murphy
IMG_20200120_214741_Murphy
stock 48mpx
IMG_20200120_214732
They are sharper and colors are prettier, murhpy loses color, they are pale
Both stock an gcam are great!
colors much better on stock, look
stock
IMG_20200120_215343
Murphy
IMG_20200120_215353_Murphy
bojan1974 said:
pictures taken with stock camera at 48mpx are better than gcam marphy i have many examples, here is just one so it's not good yet
Murphy
IMG_20200120_214741_Murphy
stock 48mpx
IMG_20200120_214732
They are sharper and colors are prettier, murhpy loses color, they are pale
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In this comparison I prefer Murphy
Hello what is the best gcam now ? I lost between many versions ..