Develop Bugs

[KERNEL][WIP][BOOTS] CAF Linux 3.10.40 kernel

This is a booting CAF 3.10 kernel for none other than our shiny OnePlus One. Personally, I'm satisfied with my phone as it is with a 3.4 kernel (and 3.10 is a lot of work without proper firmware), so I've given up on developing this 3.10 kernel. This thread is just a free-for-all for anyone who wants to have a crack at developing 3.10.
I threw this kernel together pretty sloppily 2 months ago, so I apologize for the lack of full git history from CAF and some messy code from me. The kernel is based off of the LA.BF.2.1_rb1.xx branch from CAF. The kernel should boot as-is on the official CM nightlies, and it is confirmed to boot on my CM12.1 builds. All it requires is updated WCNSS configuration binaries to boot (flashable zip available in the downloads tab of the thread). The kernel currently only supports JDI command-mode panels, and I compiled the kernel with Google's GCC 4.8 toolchain.
Source code: https://github.com/sultanxda/android_kernel_oneplus_bacon-3.10
What works:
It boots (woo)
Display
Touchscreen
Modem (no mobile data though)
WiFi
Charger (not from wall outlets though)
Battery percentage/health reporting
Volume keys
Sensors
USB
Assume everything else doesn't work. Here's a fun screenie: http://imgur.com/H1UERfr
Good luck with haxing 3.10!
XDA:DevDB Information
CAF Linux 3.10.40 kernel for Bacon, Kernel for the ONEPLUS ONE
Contributors
Sultanxda
Kernel Special Features: It boots
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2015-07-05
Last Updated 2015-07-06

@Sultanxda Awesome work bro now if only the Cyanogen.org devs supported devices like Sony
arm: qcom: Add SONY Shinano platform, msm8974pro family - https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/kernel/commit/193c3345565d0c3a202f8feac62a21842b06e347
http://developer.sonymobile.com/kno...sh-a-linux-kernel-for-aosp-supported-devices/
http://developer.sonymobile.com/kno...evices/how-to-build-and-flash-a-linux-kernel/
http://developer.sonymobile.com/201...ny-presentation-at-embedded-linux-conference/
http://developer.sonymobile.com/201...-xperia-devices-in-sonys-open-device-program/

Awsome work mate. Where can i find the original CAF branch? Somewhere at codeaurora cgit?
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app

DerRomtester said:
Awsome work mate. Where can i find the original CAF branch? Somewhere at codeaurora cgit?
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/?h=LA.BF.2.1_rb1.39

Sultanxda said:
Yep. https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/?h=LA.BF.2.1_rb1.39
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you. I am gonna create a full git history with that + your commits. If anyone wants access to it to push some code feel free to ask.
Gesendet von meinem A0001 mit Tapatalk

any inherent benefits of having linux 3.10 over 3.4?

_ASSASSIN_ said:
any inherent benefits of having linux 3.10 over 3.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.10
https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/ke...UX_ANDROID_LA.BF64.1.2.1_RB1.05.00.02.019.067

_ASSASSIN_ said:
any inherent benefits of having linux 3.10 over 3.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tons!
One I would love to mess with is Heterogeneous Multi-Processing. Also some of the other upstream scheduler commits. For one, they are what make the N6 a true quad core in that it doesn't use any hotplugging, just CPU C states while maintaining pretty decent battery life. It changes how threading works and how workloads are transferred to other cores. At least this is the main thing I would love to see and mess with. Almost makes me want to get an N6. I love my OPO though.

RenderBroken said:
Tons!
One I would love to mess with is Heterogeneous Multi-Processing. Also some of the other upstream scheduler commits. For one, they are what make the N6 a true quad core in that it doesn't use any hotplugging, just CPU C states while maintaining pretty decent battery life. It changes how threading works and how workloads are transferred to other cores. At least this is the main thing I would love to see and mess with. Almost makes me want to get an N6. I love my OPO though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
possibly collab with @DerRomtester?

_ASSASSIN_ said:
possibly collab with @DerRomtester?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man, that would be cool but it would be a massive undertaking then you would need a road map for other rom Devs to use to even use the work you have done let alone to even be accepted officially from major Roms out there like CM. This is something I have thought about alot but the work needed to put in doesn't match anything near what I would get out of it. This doesn't mean money necessarily but time, time away from family, etc.
This is still something I will take a look at. I wouldn't mind any input from @DerRomtester at all.

Added to OnePlus One index thread:
[INDEX] OnePlus One Resources Compilation Roll-Up

First I was excited then I read that this is no longer in development and I'm sad now
P.S. I'd love to see a small group of kernel devs gather around and work on this, surely at first it would be buggy, having even less performance than any kernel for our 1+1 but in the end we'll have a sweet little kernel

evronetwork said:
First I was excited then I read that this is no longer in development and I'm sad now
P.S. I'd love to see a small group of kernel devs gather around and work on this, surely at first it would be buggy, having even less performance than any kernel for our 1+1 but in the end we'll have a sweet little kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure that most devs would use this as a base if it had the proper driver support as it would provide quite the bump for security

evronetwork said:
First I was excited then I read that this is no longer in development and I'm sad now
P.S. I'd love to see a small group of kernel devs gather around and work on this, surely at first it would be buggy, having even less performance than any kernel for our 1+1 but in the end we'll have a sweet little kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Facts. We need way more collabs man. Unity gets a lot done. I personally know nothing about developing, but I'm a great tester. I'm willing to brick my phone.. Test, bootloop and brick it again lol. Everyone can play a part in the grand scheme of things.

@Sultanxda can you share your kernel with me?
I compiled it but i don't get it booting. You have made some ramdisk changes ? You added an dtb file ?

DerRomtester said:
@Sultanxda can you share your kernel with me?
I compiled it but i don't get it booting. You have made some ramdisk changes ? You added an dtb file ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No ramdisk changes, no missing dtbs. Just ran a mrproper and compiled it exactly as it is on my GitHub, and it boots. Compiled with GCC 4.8 from Google using almost the exact same script I use to compile my 3.4 kernel, with the only change being that the dtb path for the dtbtool is arch/arm/boot/dts/, not arch/arm/boot/ (though you probably already figured that out).

Sultanxda said:
No ramdisk changes, no missing dtbs. Just ran a mrproper and compiled it exactly as it is on my GitHub, and it boots. Compiled with GCC 4.8 from Google using almost the exact same script I use to compile my 3.4 kernel, with the only change being that the dtb path for the dtbtool is arch/arm/boot/dts/, not arch/arm/boot/ (though you probably already figured that out).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you mate. I think i know the problem

_ASSASSIN_ said:
Pretty sure that most devs would use this as a base if it had the proper driver support as it would provide quite the bump for security
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If companies released the drivers we would have 3.10.x, 3.18.x and even 4.2.x kernels(someone would try to do it even if it turned out a failure)
Released drivers also would have better optimised roms and would make a 5 year old device to live forever (new android e.g. android 7? no problem)
OmegaBlaze said:
Facts. We need way more collabs man. Unity gets a lot done. I personally know nothing about developing, but I'm a great tester. I'm willing to brick my phone.. Test, bootloop and brick it again lol. Everyone can play a part in the grand scheme of things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm the worst kind of programmer, I mean I do own a degree but the programming language was my weakest link, so I can't help and kernel is one of the hardest parts it needs big ..knowledge to do it :silly:
Now lets not go off topic and wish for someone to work on 3.10.x I mean even if it's buggy and a bit unstable it will bring some new stuff and when it gets stable well then the fun will start

RenderBroken said:
Tons!
One I would love to mess with is Heterogeneous Multi-Processing. Also some of the other upstream scheduler commits. For one, they are what make the N6 a true quad core in that it doesn't use any hotplugging, just CPU C states while maintaining pretty decent battery life. It changes how threading works and how workloads are transferred to other cores. At least this is the main thing I would love to see and mess with. Almost makes me want to get an N6. I love my OPO though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't exactly interested in 3.10 until i read yours comment. If this kernel can also make opo work like N6 i.e. running always on quad core mode and still maintain good battery lyf, man i would pray that either opo or cm releases 3.10 kernel.
Sent from OnePlus One

abhibnl said:
I wasn't exactly interested in 3.10 until i read yours comment. If this kernel can also make opo work like N6 i.e. running always on quad core mode and still maintain good battery lyf, man i would pray that either opo or cm releases 3.10 kernel.
Sent from OnePlus One
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will never happen. From a business perspective, it costs too much for little benefit, and only introduces the potential for more bugs.
However, here is a hint: Bacon's TrustZone firmware does not check metadata when loading firmware images, so you can technically load firmware from any device (ex: you can use Venus firmware from a totally different device).
If you know what you're doing and you have 3 months of your life to burn on this, then it should be possible to get everything working with the LA.BF.2.1_rb1.xx kernel branch.
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app

What do you think is better? Stock vs Lineage.

Since Oneplus released the new 4.5.0 OxygenOS update, many noticeable changes has been achieve, better battery life, performance, etc.
On the other hand, Android O is reaching many devices around the world thanks to professional developers on XDA community.
Should I stick with OxygenOs, or use lineage os. Which is better

OXYGEN OS

Lineage hands down. Stock is boring, u wanna stay stock buy an iphone.
So many roms to try, why you would stay stock baffles me. But each to there own ?

I suppose these kind of threads are just for opinion-gathering, but I think there's nothing wrong with that.
On one hand, stock OxygenOS is simply "things that just works." Sure, this is boring, but some people prefers to have a system that works in their day to day life. Boring? Sure. But does it works fine? Yes.
Lineage on the other hand, while stable as is, is still geared towards experimenting, that doesn't mean it's unstable though. Also, Lineage (and most other custom ROM) is pretty good when it comes to keeping devices updated - so once OnePlus 3/T is out of commission and OnePlus drops their support for the device(s), it's going to be a good idea to move to Lineage if you want to continue using the phone.
tl;dr use stock if you just want things to work, and Lineage for the sake of modding and future-proofing.
Should you switch to Lineage? Probably.

Nether if you ask me. They are both garbage when compared to an AOSP based rom like Dirty Unicorns. Both have way too many bugs for any real day to day usage.

zelendel said:
Nether if you ask me. They are both garbage when compared to an AOSP based rom like Dirty Unicorns. Both have way too many bugs for any real day to day usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We are CAF out of the box. Rom base might be AOSP but all our hardware specific stuff is CAF or LOS

F4uzan said:
I suppose these kind of threads are just for opinion-gathering, but I think there's nothing wrong with that.
On one hand, stock OxygenOS is simply "things that just works." Sure, this is boring, but some people prefers to have a system that works in their day to day life. Boring? Sure. But does it works fine? Yes.
Lineage on the other hand, while stable as is, is still geared towards experimenting, that doesn't mean it's unstable though. Also, Lineage (and most other custom ROM) is pretty good when it comes to keeping devices updated - so once OnePlus 3/T is out of commission and OnePlus drops their support for the device(s), it's going to be a good idea to move to Lineage if you want to continue using the phone.
tl;dr use stock if you just want things to work, and Lineage for the sake of modding and future-proofing.
Should you switch to Lineage? Probably.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like opinion gathering threads since they foster good discussion, but it seems that questions like these are asked every week since users posting them don't bother to search past threads despite the better content in them.
That being said, I agree that LOS is great in the future once device support is dropped, but do you see any downside in keeping OOS installed until support is dropped?

Lineage OS all the way with OMS support. Stock is boring and nothing much then black and regular theme.

any thoughts on android go?

Just heard about Android GO. Is there any thought to building it for Galaxy Nexus? With the frustrations of no root for my g6 I've been playing around with my old Nexus device. I've never built a room before but am more then willing to learn or help.

I also would think this may be a really good thing for our devices, seeing that there has now been Unofficial LineageOS 15.1 builds already being made for First Gen Android One Devices. I would also be willing to learn and test out developments, however I would probably still leave it to the professionals like @Android-Andi, @Ziyan, @nailyk, @osm0sis and @amaces.
I am positive that with a combined effort we all could make our "retro" android device, bang up to date with Oreo Go, which may also help improve speed due to memory improvements that have been made in Oreo Go. I also wouldn't be surprised if one of the mentioned above isn't already in the process of doing this.

typhoonscotland said:
I also would think this may be a really good thing for our devices, seeing that there has now been Unofficial LineageOS 15.1 builds already being made for First Gen Android One Devices. I would also be willing to learn and test out developments, however I would probably still leave it to the professionals like @Android-Andi, @Ziyan, @nailyk, @osm0sis and @amaces.
I am positive that with a combined effort we all could make our "retro" android device, bang up to date with Oreo Go, which may also help improve speed due to memory improvements that have been made in Oreo Go. I also wouldn't be surprised if one of the mentioned above isn't already in the process of doing this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not time at all (for that device) and am not good enough at kernel tasks.
If someone is able to port HWBinder on our 3.0 kernel I guess being able to help on a few things. If I get some time one day, I will try to backport it from 'my' Sony 3.4 one.

nailyk said:
If someone is able to port HWBinder on our 3.0 kernel I guess being able to help on a few things. If I get some time one day, I will try to backport it from 'my' Sony 3.4 one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Binder and other backports are not the deal breaker for Oreo on K3.0 (see our UA staging trees). The problem is lack of usable (and public) DDK UM blobs, which is much harder, if not impossible to fix. Also, the availability of Go GApps is more important than building a Go ROM.

amaces said:
Binder and other backports are not the deal breaker for Oreo on K3.0 (see our UA staging trees). The problem is lack of usable (and public) DDK UM blobs, which is much harder, if not impossible to fix. Also, the availability of Go GApps is more important than building a Go ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gapps are not important for me
I though the graphic driver was open source ?
Sorry for noob question, but I do not know the omap world...

I dunno if this would help any of our wonderful developers, however I just seen this "Oreo Low-RAM Property Mod" basically giving Oreo an Android GO style update. If I could build it all myself then I would, however I don't actually know where to even start.

Where are the Android 9 ROMs at?

Seriously. ROMs used to be available on the Nexus withint 3-4 days. Now we got treble(have ported the image from a Pixel as well) and yet there are NO custom Android 9 ROMs. It's hit AOSP for 5 days already.

it is best to wait for official Pie from OnePlus and official kernel source for Pie
the hard work will be on them this way
developers will work hard to get a stable Pie port then all this work will go away when official Pie is available as it will be a btter base

Cpt. Strawberry Crepe said:
Seriously. ROMs used to be available on the Nexus withint 3-4 days. Now we got treble(have ported the image from a Pixel as well) and yet there are NO custom Android 9 ROMs. It's hit AOSP for 5 days already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe not many devs for Oneplus devices compared to nexus i guess. Aosp builds hit nexus devices within few hours those days. Suprised to see completely working Pie build already for Xiaomi note 4 though.

I'm just surprised the OnePlus 3/3T got Android 9 before we did (considering it's an older phone and all)

We have, and working fine. Using it as my daily driver since 2 weeks.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/pr...ment/rom-android-p-developer-preview-t3816659

​
TheJedeX said:
We have, and working fine. Using it as my daily driver since 2 weeks.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/pr...ment/rom-android-p-developer-preview-t3816659
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What camera app do you use? I tried the special apk with the settings fix flashed, still it's really bad. Images are always out of focus and lack detail. I tried using the fixed camera libraries and use the arnova's gcam app but without any luck. I am interested in what others may use.

TheJedeX said:
We have, and working fine. Using it as my daily driver since 2 weeks.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/pr...ment/rom-android-p-developer-preview-t3816659
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, its not built from AOSP I guess. Its just a system image from different pie device ported. So cannot be optimised and have bugs.

TheJedeX said:
We have, and working fine. Using it as my daily driver since 2 weeks.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/pr...ment/rom-android-p-developer-preview-t3816659
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I refuse to use mokee to get proper treble support. For two reasons. One, OnePlus needs to implement it properly so that drivers are stable and etc. Two, Mokee has a terrible kernel which results in terrible SoT.

I must admit that I am generally a bit disappointed in the ROM situation with the 5t.
I always thought that Oneplus phones were among the most hacked ones out there and I expected A LOT more than what there is...

Signature Beats said:
I refuse to use mokee to get proper treble support. For two reasons. One, OnePlus needs to implement it properly so that drivers are stable and etc. Two, Mokee has a terrible kernel which results in terrible SoT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are custom kernels to flash. With custom kernel it's actually pretty efficient. Getting same SOT and idle time as I wad getting in 8. 1 custom roms.

Our prayers have been answered. And the best part is that the rom is not featureshitbuggybloated, it is pure AOSP!

Xokoz said:
Our prayers have been answered. And the best part is that the rom is not featureshitbuggybloated, it is pure AOSP!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True! But atm the new gesture navigation and NFC isn't working yet and those 2 things are mandatory for me before I start flashing
2 short questions:
1. Is treble needed for the AOSP Rom?
2. Can I root my 5t without loosing my data and keeping my bootloader?

unrealmac said:
True! But atm the new gesture navigation and NFC isn't working yet and those 2 things are mandatory for me before I start flashing
2 short questions:
1. Is treble needed for the AOSP Rom?
2. Can I root my 5t without loosing my data and keeping my bootloader?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. No.
2. No. Unlocking bootloader will erase your data.

Question Lineage vs crDroid

I've been pretty out of it for the past basically half a decade so I'm a bit out of the loop as far as the newer roms. But from what I can tell for what I want Lineage seems to be the best custom rom. A nice clean AOSP experience with improvements. To tell the truth I would probably just stick with Oxygen OS if it weren't such a ***** to perform updates while rooted. That said, crDroid is Lineage + some more improvements. So, what do you guys think? Does crDroid add enough value to justify it over just getting Lineage? What are some of your favorite crDroid features that Lineage lacks? (for those that prefer it) And what are some of the things crDroid does/has that Lineage doesn't that you *don't* like? (For those that prefer Lineage)
Thanks for the opinions, will really help me make my choice.

What do you mean pain in the ass to update while rooted?
Nothing is changed. You only restore boot image, update, install root to inactive slot, reboot.

bokkoman said:
What do you mean pain in the ass to update while rooted?
Nothing is changed. You only restore boot image, update, install root to inactive slot, reboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for answer the question and sticking to the topic

What i've learned since years of root/unlocking bootloader/flashing roms is that you should also considering a rom depending on who's maintening it. A good maintener will provide a more stable rom and frequent updates.

Klbgr said:
What i've learned since years of root/unlocking bootloader/flashing roms is that you should also considering a rom depending on who's maintening it. A good maintener will provide a more stable rom and frequent updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LineageOS as a firmware is tried and true and very stable, but doesnt innovate a lot, it's meant to be a solid clean base. crDroid has been pushing a lot of new features but might be less stable. The maintainers there seem to be actively trying to do a lot.

dkcats3 said:
LineageOS as a firmware is tried and true and very stable, but doesnt innovate a lot, it's meant to be a solid clean base. crDroid has been pushing a lot of new features but might be less stable. The maintainers there seem to be actively trying to do a lot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
crDroid is still far away from Resurrection Remix, it should be very stable.

Klbgr said:
crDroid is still far away from Resurrection Remix, it should be very stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what do you mean is far away from ressurection remix? Im not sure i understand the comparison youre making.

dkcats3 said:
what do you mean is far away from ressurection remix? Im not sure i understand the comparison youre making.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean crDroid has some a lot of features but it's nothing compared to features of RR, which is pretty stable. What I'm saying is that RR is still pretty stable with all those features, so you shouldn't worry about stability with crDroid.

Klbgr said:
I mean crDroid has some a lot of features but it's nothing compared to features of RR, which is pretty stable. What I'm saying is that RR is still pretty stable with all those features, so you shouldn't worry about stability with crDroid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I just meant they are experimenting with lots of things like a new custom kernel and built in gapps and twrp and things

dkcats3 said:
Oh I just meant they are experimenting with lots of things like a new custom kernel and built in gapps and twrp and things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernel may be better than stock kernel. Built-in Gapps are often more stable than any other flashable Gapps.
I'd recommend to try crDroid by yourself and if it doesn't fit your usage, then switch to lineage. Never try, never know.

Klbgr said:
crDroid is still far away from Resurrection Remix, it should be very stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I thought RR was long dead.

Crdroid is 100 percent stable right now and running flawlessly on my TMobile variant. I haven't seen battery life this good since my 6t either! This is with the kernel that comes with crdroid, didn't tweak any settings in kernel app.

For the record I was nowhere near this good of battery on oos I was maybe getting 3 to 3 and a half hours of sot for 50 percent battery. Crdroid kicks the crap out of that.

hadesflames said:
I've been pretty out of it for the past basically half a decade so I'm a bit out of the loop as far as the newer roms. But from what I can tell for what I want Lineage seems to be the best custom rom. A nice clean AOSP experience with improvements. To tell the truth I would probably just stick with Oxygen OS if it weren't such a ***** to perform updates while rooted. That said, crDroid is Lineage + some more improvements. So, what do you guys think? Does crDroid add enough value to justify it over just getting Lineage? What are some of your favorite crDroid features that Lineage lacks? (for those that prefer it) And what are some of the things crDroid does/has that Lineage doesn't that you *don't* like? (For those that prefer Lineage)
Thanks for the opinions, will really help me make my choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cr-droid has google apps and lineage does not. Call screen built in. It's a pixel experience.

mattie_49 said:
Cr-droid has google apps and lineage does not. Call screen built in. It's a pixel experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do note that we have gapps just because for now without proper TWRP you can't easy install them
crDroid is normally without Gapps and we plan to remove them as soon as TWRP is ready

Klbgr said:
crDroid is still far away from Resurrection Remix, it should be very stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro I think you've been found victim to the power of branding. Under no shape or form was Resurrection Remix ever better than CrDroid. A cooler boot splash logo, but that's about it.
And why is this a gentleman even comparing this to lineage? CrDroid IS lineage, with way way more features, slightly better performance.
Dumb thread.

Burt Squirtz said:
Bro I think you've been found victim to the power of branding. Under no shape or form was Resurrection Remix ever better than CrDroid. A cooler boot splash logo, but that's about it.
And why is this a gentleman even comparing this to lineage? CrDroid IS lineage, with way way more features, slightly better performance.
Dumb thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never said it was better. I meant RR has more features.

Burt Squirtz said:
Bro I think you've been found victim to the power of branding. Under no shape or form was Resurrection Remix ever better than CrDroid. A cooler boot splash logo, but that's about it.
And why is this a gentleman even comparing this to lineage? CrDroid IS lineage, with way way more features, slightly better performance.
Dumb thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP admitted they haven't been in the custom ROM game awhile, but if this is a dumb thread why take your time to say anything? Dumb reply.

gwolfu said:
we plan to remove them as soon as TWR
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Booo
Burt Squirtz said:
Bro I think you've been found victim to the power of branding. Under no shape or form was Resurrection Remix ever better than CrDroid. A cooler boot splash logo, but that's about it.
And why is this a gentleman even comparing this to lineage? CrDroid IS lineage, with way way more features, slightly better performance.
Dumb thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would apologize but it's kind of not my fault that you're illiterate. You should try learning how to read before you bother posting such idiotic responses. I literally said in my OP that crDroid is Lineage + extra features. The purpose of this topic is for me to decide whether or not I CARE about those features enough to pick crDroid over Lineage in the first place.
Truly hope you learn how to read before you post stupid comments in the future mate. Good luck.
To everyone else, thanks for your replies. Very helpful. Would still like to get some examples of things fans of crDroid like that's in crDroid but not in Lineage if possible.

hadesflames said:
Booo
I would apologize but it's kind of not my fault that you're illiterate. You should try learning how to read before you bother posting such idiotic responses. I literally said in my OP that crDroid is Lineage + extra features. The purpose of this topic is for me to decide whether or not I CARE about those features enough to pick crDroid over Lineage in the first place.
Truly hope you learn how to read before you post stupid comments in the future mate. Good luck.
To everyone else, thanks for your replies. Very helpful. Would still like to get some examples of things fans of crDroid like that's in crDroid but not in Lineage if possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand you're upset that you created a dumb thread. Everyone knows most ROMs are usually a lineage base. Lineage is very stripped down. Almost any custom ROM is probably technically better than lineage because it has more useful features.
And no that's not what you said originally in your first post. You probably went back and edited it.
How about we don't look too far/read into posts and be friends?