Related
Rate the phone 1-5 on-
Battery Life
Speed
Performence
Build quality
Overall
And tell pros and cons
EclipzeRemix said:
Rate the phone 1-5 on-
Battery Life - 3 (4hrs heavy usage)
Speed -3 (UI, browser still lags)
Performance - 2 (poorer multitask)
Build quality - 4
Overall - 3 (Not much improvement over previous model apart from better build quality and SLCD2)
Pros - beautiful designed, great camera and great screen (slcd2).
Cons - poor implementation of multitask, internal memory, laggy UI, non removable battery and no sd slot.
Source - all feedback based on my brother HOX.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Incredible S using XDA
Battery Life - 3.5
Speed - 4
Performence - 4.5
Build quality - 4
Overall - 4.2
Pros - amazing display, wonderful design
Cons - few early build quality issues, everything else doesn't matter to me (removable battery, sd slot)
3
5
3
4
3
OUKITEL K4000 Plus - Information & Reviews - 5.0" HD | MT6737 | 2GB | 16GB | 4100mAh
OUKITEL K4000 Plus
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specs:
Dimensions: 144.5 * 71.6 * 10.8 mm
Weight: 215g
Chassis: Metal + Back Plastic
SoC: MediaTek MT6737
CPU: ARM Cortex-A53, 4x1250 MHz, Cores: 4
GPU: ARM Mali-T720 MP2 520MHz, Cores: 2
Network: 4G Cat.4 (150MBps) with VoLTE Support
RAM: 2 GB
Storage: 16 GB
Memory cards: microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC
Display: 5.0 in, IPS, 720 x 1280 pixels, 24 bit
Protection: Asahi Glass
Battery: 4100mAh, Li-Polymer
OS: OUKITEL OS V1.0 (based on Android 6.0 Marshmallow)
Back Camera: 3,264 x 2,448 pixels (8MP), OmniVision Sensor, Interpolated to 13MP
Front Camera: 1920 x 1080 pixels (2MP), GalaxyCore Sensor, Interpolated to 5MP
SIM card: Dual-SIM, Dual-Standby
Wi-Fi: 802.11 b/g/n, 2.4GHz, Single-Band
USB: 2.0, Micro-USB
Bluetooth: 4.0
Positioning: GPS, A-GPS
Other Features: Front Fingerprint Scanner
Colors: Black, Gold, White
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Development & Support:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/general/oukitel-k6000-plus-development-support-t3689085
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reviews:
My own review: https://forum.xda-developers.com/ge...kitel-k4000-plus-information-reviews-t3615609
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Review (part 1)
Introduction
This is the OUKITEL K4000 Plus.
Hardware
As a successor of the OUKITEL K4000 Pro, the K4000 Plus brings some nice improvements, with an overall better build quality and a new OS (based on Android of course) called OUKITEL OS. As regards the specs, there are no major improvements. It is powered by a Mediatek MT6737, with 2GB RAM, 16GB ROM and 8MP Back Camera. Maybe an extra GB for the RAM would have been appreciated.
Unboxing
Packaging comes with the standard kit of accessories provided by OUKITEL: 1x Micro-USB Cable, 1x 5V/1.5A USB Charger, 1x Quick Start Guide, 1x Warranty Certificate, 1x TPU Cover and the Smartphone (of course). A screen protector is already applied.
Talking about the dimensions, this is where the upgrade is noticeable. It is 14.43x7.15x1.07cm, not that bad considering the battery capacity, and weights 219g, still a bit too much.
Following all latest OUKITEL devices, also this one features a Metal Chassis, but with a removable plastic back cover. It feels solid, but the back cover makes it slippery.
On the front side there is the standard 2.5D Curved Display and the upper front side of the device features a Front-Facing Camera, an Earpiece, and the Sensors hole that includes Light, Proximity and Gesture Sensors. Luckily, a Notification LED is here.
Here you can see the Notification LED in action.
On the lower front side there is just the Fingerprint Scanner in the center, with no touch keys on the sides. I can't understand this choice, it is a waste of space.
On the back side there is the removable back cover.
The upper rear side of the device features the rounded Camera Sensor supported by a single Flashlight.
On the lower rear side there are some logos together with the Speaker hole.
Device
Screen
Sincerely i'm impressed by the screen of this device, even though the color temperature is a bit too high just like on all OUKITEL devices, it is super-bright, sharp and seems to have an higher than average refresh rate.
The Light Sensor supports almost smooth light changes, with a proper auto-brightness management. This is its maximum brightness.
Viewing Angles matches IPS screen capabilities, nothing to complain about.
Camera
Unfortunately not everything can be great, and the camera department is something that definitely has not impressed me at all. The rear camera isn't able to keep the noise level low, even outdoors, and, as a result, the image detail isn't that great.
"HDR off" on the left and "HDR on" on the right. HDR works just fine, but the noise level ruins it.
Some extra photos taken outdoors. Look great only if you don't zoom them.
The Single-LED flashlight is barely sufficient to provide enough light for low-light shots.
As regards Video Recording, 720p videos are decent, with stable 25fps.
The front camera is a standard OmniVision 2MP sensor, and it isn't a wide-angle variant.
Audio
Speaker Quality confuses me, it is super loud, probably one of the loudest i have ever tried on a smartphone, but at maximum volume it distorts soo bad that it seems to be near to die. Dear OUKITEL, please reduce the maximum volume to avoid any possible hardware damage.
As regards the Microphone, it is decent but a bit too quiet, this is where the volume gain needs to be increased a bit.
GPS
GPS Signal is good, not the best, but at least it is able to lock satellites indoors.
Indoors on the left, outdoors on the right.
Telephony, Mobile Network & WiFi
OUKITEL provides full european bands support, with 4G Band 20 (some other Chinese Smartphones don’t have it). My 4G connection was working just fine, but i think the signal indicator isn't accurate, because i never managed to obtain such high speed with such a low 4G signal.
WiFi 5GHz isn't supported. Connected at 65mbps with my 2.4GHz Network, i was able to reach ~37mbps, not the best, neither the worst.
Battery Life
As always, i measure the real battery capacity using my USB Tester, and it seems that the real battery capacity almost matches the declared value (declared 4100mAh, real ~4070mAh).
Unfortunately the PCMark Battery Test crashes after a long while, so i had to switch to Antutu Tester. Not the best battery benchmark, but it is the most hard to handle benchmark with extreme battery usage, maximum brightness, and everything on. Pretty good result.
As regards battery charging times, the 5V/1.5A charger isn't fast at all, requiring more than 4 hours to full charge the device.
Software
Unlike most devices from OUKITEL, this is the first one released with OUKITEL OS! Even though i don't like custom UIs, this one doesn't seem to be too bad. Based on my research, this based on 360 OS (well-known chinese company), with a mixture of features from iOS and other UIs. The result isn't disappoting, at least for me, and the UI feels extremely smooth, even on high-load. Definitely well-optimized, unlike Dido OS or any other unknown bad UIs that i have seen in the past. Unfortunately, it is running Android 6.0 Marshmallow under the hood, but Android Security Patches are up-to-date.
All kinds of Mediatek features are still here, with MiraVision, Gestures and so on...
One Malware found using MalwareBytes Anti-Malware, but i guess this is a false positive.
The Fingerprint Scanner is blazing fast, almost instant, without any accuracy issue. I'm sorry for the video without any music and intro, but the YouTube Video Editor is out of service. If it won't be back, i will switch to a proper video editor.
Benchmarks
I have used 3DMark, AndroBench, Antutu Benchmark, Epic Citadel, GeekBench 4, GFXBench, PCMark (Work 2.0, Computer Vision, Storage & Work 1.0) and Vellamo to stress the device to the limit. I won’t test Games or Video Playback because there are already some related tests included in these Benchmark suites.
3DMark – Just like all MT6737 devices, GPU performance isn't good at all.
AndroBench – eMMC Performance is decent, write speed lower than read speed. (as expected)
Antutu Benchmark – I won’t say a lot about this benchmark, this isn’t as reliable as others. I’m providing this just for benchmarks lovers.
GeekBench – CPU Performance is nearly as good as other CPUs with the same configuration (4x Cortex-A53), enough for basic daily tasks.
CPU
Compute
GFXBench – Nothing different here, still the same low GPU performance.
PCMark – Not too bad scores for this SOC. Decent Results.
Work 2.0
Computer Vision
Storage
Work 1.0
Vellamo – As expected, overall Browser and CPU performance isn't that great.
Conclusions
It took a bit longer to review this device because, nearly to the end of the reviewing process, OUKITEL released an OTA Update T_T Meaning that i had to retest everything again haha. Anyway, at least this means that they work on the software a lot.
Excluding this funny coincidence, this device is probably the most perfect ever released by OUKITEL. Buttery Smooth UI, even on the slow MT6737 SOC, and with an overall good quality of the hardware. Maybe they could have improved cameras a bit more, but this isn't meant to be used as a camera smartphone.
Hopefully it will be updated to Android 7 Nougat as soon as possible.
I can recommend this device to all users that don't mind about using a Custom UI, and to those who are in search of a cheap battery-phone.
Pros:
Buttery Smooth UI
Multi-Color Notification LED
Powerful Speaker
Well-Built and Solid
Bright and Sharp screen panel
Cons:
Plastic Back Cover
No Magnetometer/Gyroscope Sensors
Noisy Camera Sensors
Still running on Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Inaccurate Mobile Signal indicator
Rating: 8.3
Packaging and Accessories: 8.5
Design and Materials: 7.5
Performance and Heat Dissipation: 7.5
Screen: 8
Camera: 7
Sound: 8
Battery life: 9
Software: 8.5
OEM Support: 9.5
Price: 9.5
You can find full-res images (I know, Quality isn't excellent) here: http://imgur.com/a/TRaRN
Official Website: http://www.oukitel.com/products/k/k4000-plus-68.html
You can buy it on many online shops. Official, and authorized, Retailers are listed in the OUKITEL website.
Root File!
Root file please!
I've uploaded all files needed for TWRP 3.1.1, Root, Xposed, Oukitel Rom, Spflashtool, and tutorial here => http://vavar60.online.fr/share/smartphone/?dir=oukitel/k4000_plus
Oukitel K4000 Plus Rom latest original system + TWRP 3.1.1 + Root + Xposed + Flash Tool
1 : install all drivers and reboot your system
2 : copy recovery (stock or twrp) in "Rom/SP Flash Tool/K4000Plus_V1.3_20170620 (Android 6.0 - Oukitel Os 1.0)", delete (replace recovery.img)
3 : backup all your data on the phone and shutdown your oukitel K4000 Plus, launch SP Flash tool, load MT6737M_Android_scatter.txt scatter file in Rom/SP Flash Tool/K4000Plus_V1.3_20170620 (Android 6.0 - Oukitel Os 1.0), put usb cable on your Oukitel K4000 plus and flash it with SP Flash Tool, wait finish message.
4 : disconnect USB cable, press V+ + Power for starting recovery mode (TWRP here), and change russian lang (english, french...), make a TWRP backup, then connect your USB cable on computer, with MTP, copy Xposed and Root files in theses folder, on the internal memory of your phone, then install Root/SR5-SuperSU-v2.82-SR5-20171001224502.zip, Xposed/xposed-v88-sdk23-arm64.zip
5 : exit TWRP (reboot your phone), first system loading could be ~20min.
6 : configure your Android system, then install Xposed/XposedInstaller_3.1.2.apk
7 : if your have any problem with a Xposed Module, boot in TWRP recovery, and just install Xposed/xposedS-uninstaller-20160829-arm64.zip, it gonna uninstall Xposed/xposed-v88-sdk23-arm64.zip previously installed, reboot on Android and disable the bad module, then reinstall again Xposed/xposed-v88-sdk23-arm64.zip on TWRP.
Ps : you can restore original stock for official updates with Recovery/stock-recovery_K4000Plus_V1.3_20170620.img, but your gonna need SP Flash Tool after that if your want TWRP recovery again. (Your can choose to juste restore recovery TWRP)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dev. & Support thread added to first post.
The phone was hardbrick. I have not installed the original rom. original rom cpb extension. How can I recover the phone?
cem84 said:
The phone was hardbrick. I have not installed the original rom. original rom cpb extension. How can I recover the phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Follow my tutorial using SP Flash Tool.
Ulefone Power 2 (Real Reviews & Discussion) 6050mAh, 5.5", Fingerprint ID, MTK6750T
Alright, since the thread for previous version of the power was such a success, i propose making a new one for the power 2.
My personal one will arrive in a couple weeks so, so then i'll be able to add my own user experience to the thread.
I'm expecting it to be at least as good as the previous iteration with added or improved features like bigger storage and the 5ghz wifi capability. I will not be able to compare it to the previous version at this moment because my power 1's screen broke several months ago for the second time. Due to the price of a full screen being ~ 50 euro's i did not want to spend 100 euro's total on a (at the time) 160 euro phone.
I was very pleased with it nonetheless and can't wait for this new version of it to arrive.
Main Features: (courtesy of s7yler)
● 5.5 Inch 2.5D Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Screen, 1920*1080 Pixels
● MTK6750T 1.5GHz Octa Core
● Front fingerprint sensor/scanner with touch
● Metal body design
● 4GB RAM + 64GB Storage, microSD card support
● 13 MP (SW 16 MP) Maincamera + 8 MP (SW 13 MP) Frontcamera
● Android 7.0 OS with OTA support
● 6050mAh built-in battery, Pump Express 9V 2A Fast charge
● Dual SIM: 2 x Nano SIM / MicroSD (Hybrid Tray)
● Network 2G & 3G & 4G LTE
● GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
● WCDMA 900/2100MHz
● FDD-LTE B1/B3/B7/B8/B20
Hello, it seems like it doesn't support volte and cam is bad at low light. Also the cam doesn't seem like it is 13mp at least!
The speaker is also not that good!
See some lines on pics shot at night!
Battery issues
So I've had this phone for over a month now and I have to say I'm not overly impressed with it performance battery wise (which is the main reason I got the phone)
I've read reviews that say a power user would get 2 days of use out of it.
I'm not sure if I'm a power user but I have to charge the phone every day.
My usage is as follows.
Bluetooth, mobile data , location on all day.
Listen to podcasts / music (sometimes streamed) for a few hours a day. (screen off)
Play Ingress for an hour or so.
Web browsing for an hour or so.
My screen is set to 10% brightness
I do have Facebook / FB Messenger installed which I've read can be a battery drain..
What are others usage patterns / experience of the battery life of this phone ?
Do you have the VoLTE option in call settings on your phone ? It's supposed to have it, like specified in the website Power2 features.
kensiko32 said:
Do you have the VoLTE option in call settings on your phone ? It's supposed to have it, like specified in the website Power2 features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
Would you say that the Samsung C9 Pro is "fast" in day-to-day use? A higher rating indicates that you think the Samsung C9 Pro exhibits fantastic performance. Like, is it as fast as your tears when you watch The Titanic?
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
+6Gigs of ram
+6 inch screen
+4000mAh battery
+18w fast charging
+Hi-fi
+Samsung pay
+Dual speakers
-snap dragon 653
-crap camera (although it has 2.1 mega pixel camera)
-no Android 7.0 now
-fast charging will enable when the screen are dimming
-not so much third-party rom support(but lineage OS)
-low cost performance
-Crap finger print sensor
The daily use performance are pretty GREAT, the 6gigs of RAM Will let you forgot to clean your recent tasks. The screen is fancy and big enough to enjoy YouTube time and the dual speakers feels great when you're using it, you can't back to only one speaker times. The earphones sound quality are great and I can't go out without my earphones.
But when I want to unlock my C9 pro, it is pretty terrible. It will take several times to unlock the phone and the recognize speed is so SLOW, maybe takes 1s, which is terrible.
(The most important thing is I don't like to play games on my phone,so I don't care about the performance of CPU)
hpe to improve camera quality
GF2981 said:
+6Gigs of ram
+6 inch screen
+4000mAh battery
+18w fast charging
+Hi-fi
+Samsung pay
+Dual speakers
-snap dragon 653
-crap camera (although it has 2.1 mega pixel camera)
-no Android 7.0 now
-fast charging will enable when the screen are dimming
-not so much third-party rom support(but lineage OS)
-low cost performance
-Crap finger print sensor
The daily use performance are pretty GREAT, the 6gigs of RAM Will let you forgot to clean your recent tasks. The screen is fancy and big enough to enjoy YouTube time and the dual speakers feels great when you're using it, you can't back to only one speaker times. The earphones sound quality are great and I can't go out without my earphones.
But when I want to unlock my C9 pro, it is pretty terrible. It will take several times to unlock the phone and the recognize speed is so SLOW, maybe takes 1s, which is terrible.
(The most important thing is I don't like to play games on my phone,so I don't care about the performance of CPU)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-The Hi-Fi feel nothing if I use some hi-fi headphone
-I think the fingerprint sensor is pretty good ,t can read fingerprint without turn on your screen, unlike the iPhones
-The camera in day time is pretty good but at night...Ummm... It's bad
-Let me talk about the CPU performance,I always play games, the CPU performance if u play some heavy games ilke what I did (e.g. PUBG mobile, Arena of Valor) the CPU performance just like crap ,it can handle it but low FPS and lag something.But still, the CPU performs a top middle range phone performance.
Also the battery life is pretty bad while playing heavy game
Any wrong ,I'm glad to correct information
m-net Power 1 - Information & Reviews - 5.0" HD | MT6580A | 1GB | 8GB | 5050mAh
m-net Power 1
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Specs:
Dimensions: 71.7 x 143 x 11.7 mm
Weight: 187 g
Chassis: Plastic
SoC: MediaTek MT6580A
CPU: ARM Cortex-A7, 1300 MHz, Cores: 4
GPU: ARM Mali-400 MP1, Cores: 1
RAM: 1 GB
Storage: 8 GB
Memory cards: microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC
Display: 5.0 in, IPS, 720 x 1280 pixels, 24 bit
Protection:
Battery: 5050 mAh
OS: FreemeOS (based on Android 7.0 Nougat)
Back Camera: 2560 x 1960 pixels (5MP), OmniVision Sensor
Front Camera: 2560 x 1960 pixels (5MP), with Flashlight, OmniVision Sensor
SIM card: Dual-SIM, Dual-Standby
Wi-Fi: b, g, n 2.4GHz, single-band, Wi-Fi Hotspot
USB: 2.0, Micro-USB
Bluetooth: 4.0
Positioning: GPS, A-GPS
Other Features:
Colors: Black, Golden, Grey, Lime
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Development & Support:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/general/m-net-power-1-development-support-t3725777
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reviews:
My own review: Post #2 & #3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Review (part 1)
Introduction
This is the m-net Power 1.
Hardware
Joining the battery phone area, this device features an huge battery considering that it is only a 5 inches device: 5050mAh. Thus, combined with the low-power and also low-end Mediatek MT6580 SOC clocked at 1.30GHz, the battery life should be great, or not? Keep reading the review to know more.
Unboxing
Packaging comes with basic accessories: 1x Micro-USB Cable, 1x 5V/1.5A USB Charger, 1x Quick Start Guide, 1x Warranty Card, 1x Extra Back Cover and the Smartphone (of course). A plastic screen protector is already applied, but there isn't any case included in the box.
Being a battery phone, it is clear that this device can't be considered small neither light. It is 14.3x7.17x1.17cm, with noticeable bezels, and with a weight of 187g.
The whole device is made of plastic, there are no metal parts for the body, but the unibody removable plastic back cover make the device pretty solid, even though it doesn't feel premium at all.
On the front side there is the usual 2.5D Curved Display and the upper front side of the device features the Front-Facing Camera supported by a Flashlight, an Earpiece, and the Sensors hole that includes Light, Proximity and Gesture Sensors. No Notification LED is here.
On the lower front side there is the classic soft-keys zone, with Recents, Home and Back buttons.
The upper rear side of the device features the Camera Sensor supported by a Single-LED Flashlight.
On the lower rear side there isn't important anything at all since the speaker is located on the bottom.
Device
Screen
Even though this is a low-end budget smartphone, it features a decent screen, with an acceptable color accuracy. I would not have expected to find such a good screen on this device, impressive.
The Light Sensor supports partial light changes, with a sufficient auto-brightness management. This is its maximum brightness.
Viewing Angles almost matches IPS screen capabilities, but there seems to be a small gap between the screen and the touch-panel. I guess this is not a full-laminated screen.
Camera
Camera Quality is mediocre, barely sufficient to get some decent shots, but with an excellent auto-focus management. There seems to be an issue with the exposure management, making all photos look darker than usual even on excellent light conditions. An OTA update might fix this issue.
Just like most budget smartphones, also this one doesn't have an high quality flashlight, with a noticeable blue tint. It is powerful though, still better than nothing.
As regards Video Recording, 1080p videos are recorded at 25fps, with a barely stable frame-rate.
This will probably sound weird, but the front-camera is able to take some great shots, and the front flashlight is powerful too. Unbelievable.
Audio
Unfortunately, when it comes to audio quality, it is possible to notice that this is a budget smartphone. Lack of volume from the speaker, and muffled microphone.
For standard calls it is just fine, but i can't recommend it for sound recording in loud environments.
GPS
GPS quality is decent for outdoor usage, insufficient indoors.
Outdoors on the left, Indoors of the right.
Telephony, Mobile Network & WiFi
Being an old-style 2G/3G smartphone, it isn't possible to get any great result, at least not in my area, using the mobile connection. Signal Reception seems to be great, but do not consider this result as the bible since 3G network coverage is basically everywhere nowadays.
The same can't be said for the WiFi connection. Connected to my 2.4GHz network, the result was not impressive as regards the bandwidth, unfortunately an issue present on the majority of MT6580 devices.
Battery Life
Following my standard battery testing procedure, i tested the real capacity using my USB Tester, and, based on the result, its capacity doesn't match the declated value (declared ~5050mAh, real ~4795mAh).
As expected, the PCMark Battery Life test provides a great result, reaching almost 18 hours and an half. (lowest brightness, WiFi on, Sync on)
Thankfully, m-net provides a 5V/1.5A charger instead of a crappy 1A or 0.5A. Ok, this isn't still fast charging, but with more or less 3 hours it is possible to recharge the device completely.
Software
Running on Android Nougat 7.0 with July 2017 Security Patches and a light version of the FreemeOS ROM, the device looks pretty clean and doesn't have major performance issues. Unfortunately, there is some bloatware pre-installed, that can be uninstalled without any problem. Due to the screen refresh rate capped to ~50hz, the UI doesn't feel as smooth as it should be.
Common Mediatek Features such as MiraVision, double tap-to-wake, gestures and so on are there.
No Malwares Detected by the MalwareBytes Anti-Malware app.
Review (part 2)
Benchmarks
I have used 3DMark, AndroBench, Antutu Benchmark, Epic Citadel, GeekBench 4, GFXBench, PCMark (Work 2.0, Computer Vision, Storage & Work 1.0) and Vellamo to stress the device to the limit. I won’t test Games or Video Playback because there are already some related tests included in these Benchmark suites.
3DMark – A Mali-400MP2 GPU struggles to provide enough power for 3D apps.
AndroBench – A low-end eMMC has been used, i would have preferred something better.
Antutu Benchmark – I won’t say a lot about this benchmark, this isn’t as reliable as others. I’m providing this just for benchmarks lovers.
Epic Citadel – Some OpenGL 2.0 games should have enough power for a decent gaming experience.
GeekBench – CPU Performance is as low as expected, due to the 4x Cortex-A7 SOC.
CPU
Compute
GFXBench – Not the best GPU performance here, but i might have expected something even worse.
PCMark – Just like on all MT6580 devices running on Nougat, the Work 2.0 test isn't able to run properly due to issues with Video Editing tasks so i guess some codecs are not working properly.
Work 2.0
Computer Vision
Storage
Work 1.0
Vellamo – Surprisingly, all tests run correctly even with just 1GB of RAM. The results of course can't be impressive.
Conclusions
This is the first device ever released by m-net, and, considering what they managed to obtain, i guess they will keep focusing on budget devices. Even though it is called "Power 1", it can't be defined a powerful device. OK, its battery is superb, but it would have been better to have some extra performance too.
I do not dislike the idea of having a compact battery phone, since many users do not like devices with a screen bigger than 5.2". With a decent front camera, and a solid, but cheap, build quality, i can't say this is a device that should be ignored completely. I hope m-net will fix the back camera auto-exposure issue, and why not, also optimize the OS a bit more, in order to obtain a more usable smart-brick (not in a bad way, but it is thick).
Pros:
Solid Build Quality
Impressive Screen Brightness
Great Battery Life
Extra Back Cover included
Cons:
No Notification LED
Issues with Back Camera auto-exposure
Low Screen Refresh Rate
Audio Quality could have been better
Battery Capacity lower than declared
Rating: 7.7
Packaging and Accessories: 8.5
Design and Materials: 7.5
Performance and Heat Dissipation: 6
Screen: 8
Camera: 7
Sound: 6
Battery Life: 9.5
Software: 8
OEM Support: Unknown
Price: 9
You can find full-res images (I know, Quality isn't excellent) here: http://imgur.com/a/xyond
Official Website: http://www.m-netmobile.cc/p1/
You can buy it on many online shops. Official, and authorized, Retailers are listed in the m-net website.
Grazie
---------- Post added at 08:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:57 AM ----------
Si può fare il root con i soliti kingo root etc. ?
Fastboot and the m-net power
Can't get the phone to stay in fastboot it enters fastboot mode but within seconds it boots. Is there a button combination im suppost to press or something
i tried kingo root. no luck. i think its a glitch with my phone.. ill try kingo again
how to download rom? my m net power have a problem with a firmware, is very very laggy
andreamalachi said:
how to download rom? my m net power have a problem with a firmware, is very very laggy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here it is: https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/general/m-net-power-1-development-support-t3725777