Anyone here running Paranoid Android on their Nexus 7 2013 Wifi? I can't seem to find any videos on youtube.
How's it running for you?
You dont need any videos, it is just stock with theme engine and some quicksettings toggles.
People usually stay away from Paranoid Android because : It gets updated at most twice a year and usually they abandon updating they ROM after one build. For example on any device: MM comes out, they release after half an year a build and then maybe, if lucky, another one after 4-5 months and then after a month or so, Nougat comes out they do not make a final build of MM and so on. It's just unreliable ... I prefer staying on Google's stock image and root it, instead of having a custom ROM with almost 0 added customization options and unreliable updates and improvements that "may" or may not come in the future if they want to release a build or they just skip to next Android version.
TL;DR : Google Stock Image > Paranoid Android because it has almost the same limited UI customization options and features but Google updates Android with fixes and security updates more frequently than Paranoid Android does. My advice : stay away from Paranoid Android.
True, it is not going to harm your device or anything but there is no reason at all to get into the trouble of installing this rom and setting everything up from scratch.
Now we have a reboot. This LineageOS must start in which number?
1.0 according with its birth?
7.1 according android's version?
14.1 according previous CM's version?
I personally prefer 7.1
lfuentes said:
Now we have a reboot. This LineageOS must start in which number?
1.0 according with its birth?
7.1 according android's version?
14.1 according previous CM's version?
I personally prefer 7.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
14.1 would be better, as it is new version of cyanogen
I vote for Android version numbers but with more characters, not necessarily numbers, to signify LOS revisions. So 7.1.1A, 7.1.1B, etc (of course preceded by 7.1.1 Beta 1 and 7.1.1 RC1).
My only other idea is to not use numbers at all. Start with the same letter than the current Android version is, and choose some other word (not necessarily a confection, but could be). So just example LineageOS Nerd, and then Nerd-A, etc.
Best keep it as the CM naming. Otherwise its pointless changing of things just for the sake of it. Its worked just fine for the past 6 years.
Same as CM!
i prefer 7.1 same as android version
1.0, to mark the difference with cm and aosp : it has to be a new start
LM6x for Lineage Marshmallow and Android version
LN7x for Lineage Nougat and Android version and so on.
Please just use the android version numbers and put the build number behind it, like that:
LinOS7.1v32 for example
Same as Android version it's based on.
So right not is should be 7.1
This way, its easy to understand its new-ness.
When anybody is co.paring it with Stock Android released by Google.
CyanogenMod version numbers correspond to android versions (N is 14th letter of alphabet, M is 13th etc), no reason to change it.
I vote to go with the Android version for clarification. For instance new people to flashing will need to download GAPPS.
I'm sorry, but who in the heck is going to know that cm14 refers to a letter in the alphabet. And what letter is 14.1?
Who the heck that is new to flashing is going to know that 14.1 refers to 7.1.
Let's stop trying to build on what does not make sense, follow Androids version numbering from Google which will mean everyone will know what the next version will be call, no debates period.
There is no sense in going out of the way. Start with 7.1 and keep it in sync to what Google releases. Don't make things more complicated then they have to be.
I do find the Cyanogenmod numbering a bit confusing. I'd rather have it follow the Android system.
I think they should use the android version numbers and put the build number behind it... LOS 7.1.1V2, LOS 7.1.1V3, LOS 7.1.1V4 and so on...
cato1986 said:
I vote to go with the Android version for clarification. For instance new people to flashing will need to download GAPPS.
I'm sorry, but who in the heck is going to know that cm14 refers to a letter in the alphabet. And what letter is 14.1?
Who the heck that is new to flashing is going to know that 14.1 refers to 7.1.
Let's stop trying to build on what does not make sense, follow Androids version numbering from Google which will mean everyone will know what the next version will be call, no debates period.
There is no sense in going out of the way. Start with 7.1 and keep it in sync to what Google releases. Don't make things more complicated then they have to be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
New people would hopefully see the big [7.1.1] tag next to the title. Instead of [CM14.1] [7.1.1] its [LAOS14.1] [[7.1.1]. Even if they don't see it there its always at the bottom of the post. I mean newbies who can't find out the version number probably haven't even got past the unlock bootloader / TWRP stage yet.
Im all for 1.0 it would be ballsy.
---------- Post added at 12:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 PM ----------
Im using CM since my 1st Android device (HTC Magic) and had no idea of this... Not that practical, I guess.
I mean, even now that I know it is not that easy to think what Android verion is, lets say, CM11... (Im singing the alphabet song conting in my fingers and then I have to make the dessert-to-Android numbering conversion later on).
Its just like the imperial system!
Myrtana said:
CyanogenMod version numbers correspond to android versions (N is 14th letter of alphabet, M is 13th etc), no reason to change it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LineageOS 7.1
The Ubuntu system sounds cooler
For those of you who don't know, if a build of Ubuntu was released on October 10th, it's version number would be 10.10 (YY.MM)
Same as CM.
I agree
aIeck said:
I do find the Cyanogenmod numbering a bit confusing. I'd rather have it follow the Android system.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree. Keeping it in line is more simple. Although I love how people like to say if you can't figure out what version of Android a ROM uses you must be to stupid to get past a boot locker.
Seriously not everyone learns everything at once, let's make this as clear for newbies. Just because the rest of you know the history of CM and others want to start at 1.0 because it is a new project doesn't mean we should. Matching with Android versioning will keep everyone in the same page.
As good example, Ubuntu thought about the user experience by making things just work out of the box vs some more advance learning curve distros.... Because of this Ubuntu is one of the most popular distributions. It looked at everyone instead of just those who had been using Linux for years.
Make it easy for new users to adopt, make it plain out bold and obvious that it is in line with Android versioning.
I have found very little info on this company evidently they either merged or out of business anyhow what i do know is its android 4.1.1 aka jelly bean it mentions oracle im familiar with linux i run mint..... anyway being this devuce is not listed anywhere and its likely old i know im only looking to surf the web/read basic stuff it is rooted with king root i have done a factory reset as well the issue is im not quite sure how much i can upgrade it to or what rom i might get to work upgradeing via settings isnt an option eveidently matsunichi has dropped all support or vanished the settings for this tablet is limited i cant even "disable" apps temporarily very limited but being there is no device with this name listed on supported devices im not sure if i can upgrade to a newer version of android im not worried about camera,gps,etc
just would like to surf,facebook,you tube,read email,basic stuff if i could i would just load it up with mint any idea what android version might work/upgrade to if you need build numbers etc i know where to find them the number is build JB.JRO03l.2883 kernel version 3.0.31-130328
i know its killed by ms but is there an unofficial method to use it? like installing an older rom or something? i have a lumia 1520.
Hello, search in youtube, a Indi teen show how you can use with a 8.1 rom without updated to 10
i am trying this on my 2nd phone which is 925 just for fun. so far i updated the phone from 8.1 to 10. and it seems i am on incorrect build for astoria. i found a post in xda cant remember where, says u need to be on build 240 or less. since last builds have the project removed.
My Nokia 6.1 is with 8.1 Stock Rom.Now I saw a notification saying 'a system update of 1.53 GB is downloaded.Restart the phone to install it'. Where is this downloaded file located?
Anybody please advise.
Waiting with thanks.....
Nobody seems to answer my question.Any one please tell me the download location of Nokia 6.1 System Update.
Waiting with thanks....
pnsdhrn said:
Nobody seems to answer my question.Any one please tell me the download location of Nokia 6.1 System Update.
Waiting with thanks....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nobody knows exact location except nokia devs .just restart mobile it will be installed automatically when you download it . andriod 8.1 upgraded to andriod 10 check it.you still using android 8.1 , 10 you have tried andriod 11 and andriod 12 customs toms ?
windows3600pro said:
nobody knows exact location except nokia devs .just restart mobile it will be installed automatically when you download it . andriod 8.1 upgraded to andriod 10 check it.you still using android 8.1 , 10 you have tried andriod 11 and andriod 12 customs toms ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have already tried Android8,9&10 Stock Roms and Custom11&12 ROMs.Of these I have found and experienced Android 8.0 & 8.1 Stock ROMs as most smooth and reliable.So I flashed Nokia 6.1 with Android 8.1.But immediately after rebooting to system, I forgot to invalidate automatic flashing updates in Developer options .So the OS got updated to Android 10 automatically without my knowledge and Root is also lost.So in the next time after flashing 8.1 ROM again, whenever the Android 10 software is downloaded automatically,I want to delete it frm the downloaded folder.That is why I am asking the location of downward location of updates.