Related
Hello mates,
My question is if you know if the Cyanogenmod team is working or will work in one of the SM-P605 ROM.
Thank you very much!
Psycho Pufo said:
Hello mates,
My question is if you know if the Cyanogenmod team is working or will work in one of the SM-P605 ROM.
Thank you very much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK at the moment there is no development, nor comments on plans for it. That being said, when you look at the Samsung lineup supported historically, it ought to get support at some point.
Also worth keeping an eye out for any OmniROM support in the future, which consists of a solid team of developers, including Chainfire. It will support S3 and Note II at some point, so perhaps more Samsung stuff will be added later. Note, that OmniROM will support multiwindow.
delanvital said:
AFAIK at the moment there is no development, nor comments on plans for it. That being said, when you look at the Samsung lineup supported historically, it ought to get support at some point.
Also worth keeping an eye out for any OmniROM support in the future, which consists of a solid team of developers, including Chainfire. It will support S3 and Note II at some point, so perhaps more Samsung stuff will be added later. Note, that OmniROM will support multiwindow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply!
I was waiting for the release of the new Nexus 10, but as it seems that Google has other plans I have considered purchasing a Note 10.1 2014 Edition.
The problem is that I prefer pure Android on Samsung adds layers, so my question about Cyanogenmod ROMS.
If not they hope the team OmniROM get something going.
Greetings Fellow.
Psycho Pufo said:
Thanks for the reply!
I was waiting for the release of the new Nexus 10, but as it seems that Google has other plans I have considered purchasing a Note 10.1 2014 Edition.
The problem is that I prefer pure Android on Samsung adds layers, so my question about Cyanogenmod ROMS.
If not they hope the team OmniROM get something going.
Greetings Fellow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was also waiting for the Nexus 10, I love my Nexus 7. The s-pen and multi-window convinced me to get this tablet though. So far I am very happy and use both features all the time. They are also the two most stable and well-designed features. Rest of Samsung's gimmicks I found pointless or too unreliable. I will try OmniROM as well if/when it comes out. Still need to sort out if the s-pen stuff will work just as well with OmniROM... but that is months away, at the moment we have root and the last bugs are being ironed out for the recovery, after that comes new ROMs and kernels I hope
Psycho Pufo said:
Thanks for the reply!
I was waiting for the release of the new Nexus 10, but as it seems that Google has other plans I have considered purchasing a Note 10.1 2014 Edition.
The problem is that I prefer pure Android on Samsung adds layers, so my question about Cyanogenmod ROMS.
If not they hope the team OmniROM get something going.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same boat. The third alternative I'm considering is Sony Xperia Tablet Z, which has slightly lesser specs (though it has better looks in my opinion) but is already supported by Cyanogenmod. Considering my current Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (GSM) was never fully supported by CM (i.e. no stable versions), I don't really want to buy a tablet before I'm reasonably certain CM will work well on it...
dsfdfsdfs said:
I'm in the same boat. The third alternative I'm considering is Sony Xperia Tablet Z, which has slightly lesser specs (though it has better looks in my opinion) but is already supported by Cyanogenmod. Considering my current Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (GSM) was never fully supported by CM (i.e. no stable versions), I don't really want to buy a tablet before I'm reasonably certain CM will work well on it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you make cm a requirement? Are other roms that have been fully de bloated etc and use a modified kernel, all that jazz, are they really that bad? Especially with an s pen...I may be wrong but I suspect that s pen useability would be sacrificed with a non tw rom
asaqwert said:
Why would you make cm a requirement? Are other roms that have been fully de bloated etc and use a modified kernel, all that jazz, are they really that bad? Especially with an s pen...I may be wrong but I suspect that s pen useability would be sacrificed with a non tw rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, my priorities are "stockness", UI customization (things like battery indicator, softbuttons, lockscreen shortcuts), stability (including a low amount of bugs), and Android version upgrades. While s pen is nice, its usability is an acceptable loss for me.
As for other more customized roms... As a Linux distribution and kernel developer myself, I believe a proper release process (including a long-ish stabilization period) and QA is a must on a project as large as Android roms to achieve a good level of stability, and CyanogenMod seems to be doing quite OK in those.
(I guess this doesn't apply that much to ROMs that are just minor modifications from manufacturer versions, since the possibility of regressions is much smaller on those)
I also don't care for specific kernel modifications or performance improvements etc. that much, the question I ask myself is "Why didn't the manufacturer do it like that in the first place?" or "Why doesn't CM do it?". If there's something I want that is missing from CM, I would submit it for inclusion in CM first, in which case it either gets merged in or refused (for a good reason, I'd hope). From what I've seen their policy has been reasonable and suited to my needs so far.
asaqwert said:
I suspect that s pen useability would be sacrificed with a non tw rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bingo!
Can't we do a pledge thing and hope someone would help make the note 10.1 2014 reach it into cyanogenmod? I would definitely pledge a fair amount.
dsfdfsdfs said:
Well, my priorities are "stockness", UI customization (things like battery indicator, softbuttons, lockscreen shortcuts), stability (including a low amount of bugs), and Android version upgrades. While s pen is nice, its usability is an acceptable loss for me.
As for other more customized roms... As a Linux distribution and kernel developer myself, I believe a proper release process (including a long-ish stabilization period) and QA is a must on a project as large as Android roms to achieve a good level of stability, and CyanogenMod seems to be doing quite OK in those.
(I guess this doesn't apply that much to ROMs that are just minor modifications from manufacturer versions, since the possibility of regressions is much smaller on those)
I also don't care for specific kernel modifications or performance improvements etc. that much, the question I ask myself is "Why didn't the manufacturer do it like that in the first place?" or "Why doesn't CM do it?". If there's something I want that is missing from CM, I would submit it for inclusion in CM first, in which case it either gets merged in or refused (for a good reason, I'd hope). From what I've seen their policy has been reasonable and suited to my needs so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't care about the S-pen, why even get this tablet at all!? There are a number of other tablets that while maybe lacking OTHER features than the active pen, but generally that's the specific feature that people get ANY of the Note series for.
cspradlin said:
If you don't care about the S-pen, why even get this tablet at all!? There are a number of other tablets that while maybe lacking OTHER features than the active pen, but generally that's the specific feature that people get ANY of the Note series for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reason I got it was for multi windows only, and I'm sure with cyanogenmod we could come up with a mod for multi windows. This tab also has a beastly CPU and RAM which are other reasons I got this tab. I personally don't see using the pen much at all.
cspradlin said:
If you don't care about the S-pen, why even get this tablet at all!? There are a number of other tablets that while maybe lacking OTHER features than the active pen, but generally that's the specific feature that people get ANY of the Note series for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally I wanted the super high resolution, and the Nexus 10 is now getting long in the tooth and not available with 4G or 3G (and no way I'd go Apple!)
The pen would work with Cyanogen anyway (it did on my previous Galaxy Note I), you just lose the advanced functionalities. Plain Android has support for pen input.
CM is good and I use it on my Galaxy S3. However the multiwindow features for me personally are too good to give up. I figured I wouldn't use CM unless there's a multiwindow mod for it, or something like Omnirom should come out for this. The only other S-pen feature from the air view I find useful is pen window. Everything else is just gimmicks it feels like.
However I would really like a knox 0x0 root method first for the P600 version...sad to say it might not even happen at this point
really want it
Currently No Cyanogenmod rom has supported Multi window, So your probably out of luck OP you will lose Spen and multi window with cyanogen multiwindow is part of the touchwiz framework if I remember Correctly
Sent from my SM-P600 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I was about to invest money into CM because I really like the mod.. However now I read that S-Pen and multi window are not supported? As I just bought a Note 10.1 2014 Edition, I am interested to find a Mod that supports multi window and s-pen, can anyone point me in a direction? apart from having installed CM on my devices and the devices of some friends I have no idea about the mod world.
Thank you
God's Creator said:
I was about to invest money into CM because I really like the mod.. However now I read that S-Pen and multi window are not supported? As I just bought a Note 10.1 2014 Edition, I am interested to find a Mod that supports multi window and s-pen, can anyone point me in a direction? apart from having installed CM on my devices and the devices of some friends I have no idea about the mod world.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You people make no sense. Why spend $600 on the most advanced tablet on the market only to attempt to install a ROM that will wipe out all of its selling features to then try and spend several hours finding a way to get those features back? I enjoy CM on my S3 as much as the next guy, but on this tablet it just makes no sense! Wait for Google to refresh the nexus 10 if you need stock Android that badly.
@¿Will-it-Blend?
Many reasons, Ill list some of the important ones:
1. I like samsung (Im a shareholder)
2. The tab in itself is good, so when I can chose to have a good tab with no extra features or a ****ty tab with no extra features I chose the good one.
3. Should any of the modders ever be capable of implementing the extra gadgets I already have a tab that can handle them, if not I have a good tab that can do the same as the ****ty tab but with more style
I hope this answered your question to your satisfaction, sadly you didnt even try to answer mine. Im still interested if anyone knows of any mods out there that support the extra features and are as stable and clean as CM? Or any mod for that tab, as at this moment my tab is laying around unused since there is no CM version for it.
God's Creator said:
@¿Will-it-Blend?
Many reasons, Ill list some of the important ones:
1. I like samsung (Im a shareholder)
2. The tab in itself is good, so when I can chose to have a good tab with no extra features or a ****ty tab with no extra features I chose the good one.
3. Should any of the modders ever be capable of implementing the extra gadgets I already have a tab that can handle them, if not I have a good tab that can do the same as the ****ty tab but with more style
I hope this answered your question to your satisfaction, sadly you didnt even try to answer mine. Im still interested if anyone knows of any mods out there that support the extra features and are as stable and clean as CM? Or any mod for that tab, as at this moment my tab is laying around unused since there is no CM version for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't answer your question because there are none . Ommi ROM has a multi-window feature but I highly doubt they will support this device. It will be some time before CM even supports this device. I feel sorry for you that you feel the need to cripple your device but it will still be a good while before you even see CM and it incorporates the features the stock ROM offers and for it to be just as stable as well. And that's if AOSP ROMS incorporate these features at all.
About the multiwindow on CM thing, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but there's an xposed module that lets you use a feature similar to multiwindow.
I say that not to be mean, but because of using my other Android devices the last few years and loving it, I was looking forward to a similar experience with the 10.1 tablet (WiFi,) only to find out it seems like there really isn't a scene for this rom.
I saw one rom that was discontinued, and maybe 1 or 2 more, but it doesn't seem like the roms are being maintained like on other devices. Maybe I am wrong and missing something, but if there is any other roms for this 10.1 tablet (WiFi) that I am missing out on, please do point me that roms way so I could give it a try.
Thank you,
Whiteice
Yeah I wish I had bought the tab 2 10.1. Only difference in specs is this retarded intel cpu. Breaks my heart to see all those roms in the tab 2 10.1 forum. I guess I secretly hoped someone would port windows 7 or 8 to this because of the cpu. Captain backfire, [me] my last tablet was a dell streak 7, so I am no stranger to orphaned devices. At least we get kit kat (hopefully)
Of those that are available, the discontinued BinDroid ONE v.2.0.1 seems to be the best, IMHO. Has a nice look and feel. All the bloat is gone and it runs very smoothly. Will it increase battery life I don't know. I haven't run it all day to see what I will get out of it. I really don't use my tab for anything but as a small chart plotter for sailing in to/out of harbors. And in that regard, it works great. GPS is very fast and accurate.
Tquarter said:
Yeah I wish I had bought the tab 2 10.1. Only difference in specs is this retarded intel cpu. Breaks my heart to see all those roms in the tab 2 10.1 forum. I guess I secretly hoped someone would port windows 7 or 8 to this because of the cpu. Captain backfire, [me] my last tablet was a dell streak 7, so I am no stranger to orphaned devices. At least we get kit kat (hopefully)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No idea what you are trying to get out of it, but you can do any of the mods that developers do for the ROMs on your own with very little effort. Root, then freeze or remove apps you don't need. Use xPOsed to tweak the theme. Forget overclock and voltage, its not worth the effort. Don;t like the home screens?, install a new launcher from the play store.
DigitalMD said:
No idea what you are trying to get out of it, but you can do any of the mods that developers do for the ROMs on your own with very little effort. Root, then freeze or remove apps you don't need. Use xPOsed to tweak the theme. Forget overclock and voltage, its not worth the effort. Don;t like the home screens?, install a new launcher from the play store.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes...I can do all of those things...but have you ever installed a custom rom? I mean come on man. it's a little more than home screens and a launcher dude. I have had kitkat on my captivate for 6 months and it is a 2010 device. Cyanogen even supports it but not my brand new tab 3 10.1. Yes, root and remove apps is no big deal but certainly not the reason I install custom roms. Is that the reason you install a custom rom? If so...you don't expect much from your device.
Are even Intel devices overclockable? I thought that Intel restricts such thing. Feel free to correct me. The GPU is another story though...
I was thinking about buying a remix ultra tablet, but before I buy, I wonder if I could flash remix OS on my nexus 7 2013 so that I would know what I'm getting into before spending $300? Has anyone tried doing this successfully? If so, how?
It is a decent hardware but I wonder if you can flash something else on it later.
I am not sure if you can flash on it or not, but if the remix OS is not buggy, then it doesn't matter to me. I actually do want to buy it for productivity purposes, as it comes. If the software works, then it would be even better than a pixel C for productivity to me, not only for price, I like the design, and the software looks good too. But like I am saying, I was wanting to try the Remix OS software first on a device that I already have, before I spend $300 on a device designed specifically for that software which could be buggy.
Hey all,
I've lurked around the forums for an answer but can't seem to find any posts about this or anything. I'm wondering what folks consider as the best tablet that is currently available (January 2017) for Remix OS?
In terms of "best tablet" I mean something for gaming, general use, productivity, pretty high specs, etc. And of course, the tablet should be able to run Remix OS without any (major/minor) hiccups.
I see the Google Pixel C is capable of running Remix OS but can't really find any posts or comments from folks about other solid tablets that run Remix. And, please do not suggest any Microsoft Surface product.
What are any recommendations from the community?
Thanks!
No one has suggestions for what might be a bada$$ tablet for Remix OS?
Well, as you mentioned it runs flawless on my pixel c. Anyway, I switched back to Stock because of the lack of updates under Remix OS. Despite of this it's the best productivity OS for Android around.
poincare said:
Hey all,
I've lurked around the forums for an answer but can't seem to find any posts about this or anything. I'm wondering what folks consider as the best tablet that is currently available (January 2017) for Remix OS?
In terms of "best tablet" I mean something for gaming, general use, productivity, pretty high specs, etc. And of course, the tablet should be able to run Remix OS without any (major/minor) hiccups.
I see the Google Pixel C is capable of running Remix OS but can't really find any posts or comments from folks about other solid tablets that run Remix. And, please do not suggest any Microsoft Surface product.
What are any recommendations from the community?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using remix os on huawei matebook, it is a windows 12 inch core m tablet, but I managed to install remix os on it, the only flaw is power button does not work, so I have to set the remix os to keep screen awake all the time, other than that, perfect.
it gives me the smoothest android experience, it runs much faster than pixel c, and of course it can switch back to Windows 10
lol the best tablet should be surface pro 3, everything works.
Sent from my Surface Pro 3 using Tapatalk
Yong73 said:
lol the best tablet should be surface pro 3, everything works.
Sent from my Surface Pro 3 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surface pro at 800 grams is too heavy for prolonged tablet use.
I much prefer Huawei's matebook (better specs too) and I would had held onto it if the power button was not broken (on Remix OS) and since I can't stand Windows on tablets I had to return it.
I think remix OS is best used on lightweight 2in1s , more heavyweight ones are better used in laptop mode in which case windows is probably better
My OS hierarchy goes like this :
Desktop/laptop: Windows if you're gaming / need proprietary software. Linux if not (distro doesn't matter)
Tablet: Remix OS
Phones: Android, the closest to vanilla the better.
IMO windows is bad for anything without a keyboard
Chrome OS is bad for everyone
Apple operating systems while polished are too restrictive. They're a throwback to early computing which is obsolete. Eventually they will be phased out.
Edit: oops sorry , for resurrecting an ancient thread. Just saw the date.
I'm using RemixOS on my MiPad 2. It is not a perfect option since Mipad is not officially supported. But it's the best one for its price and quality.
I'm not into gaming and I strongly doubt Mipad has good gaming experience. But for everyday use and study it's quite OK.
It just really bugs me to see that the SGS3 {GT-I9300} Having Android N and Android MM ROMS. It feels like our device has very less amount of ROMS compared to the SGS3...?
All the devs who do this are greatly appreciated?
Regular S3 was a flagship worldwide sold...
That's why there are many ROM
What I'm saying is there is very less amount of Android 6 and 7 ROMs... There are ROMs I agree... Lots if them... But not the new ones...
It would be great to have Nougat. S3 gt-i9300 has lineage os 14.1 with Nougat but it doesn't work for us.
New fresh Roms
So do i think that I9301I device deserves current roms as Lineage. Could somebody help us. Thanks. Join us all Guys that also have this device. :victory: Cheers
Guys I'm changing this thread to a petition thread so we can get some attention.
SnapDrag910 said:
...petition thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All devs here work for free, they waste own time for us, community. We can not demand anything from them.
Bro we have great developers like @Rox @n1kolaa @I'mTheMr @German Developer @SoUnd001 .etc
But the one of reasons is it,real life is important.
developers can't earn money with make rom for free for us many of them have school or job.
and one of the reasons is it,S3 Neo's driver is old and compile rom for it is really hard,we are just see S3 have mm or n roms but we don't think who made it?! how made it?! why made it?!
after all we should accept after @LGaljo or after Motion Rom our device is dead.maybe @n1kolaa make cm13 for our device but now cm13 is old too...
SnapDrag910 said:
It just really bugs me to see that the SGS3 {GT-I9300} Having Android N and Android MM ROMS. It feels like our device has very less amount of ROMS compared to the SGS3...?
All the devs who do this are greatly appreciated?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S3 was a flagship device and is one of the most documented devices ever seen. I mean you can even write an i9300 emulator fully somehow ?. That's why I9300 has many ROMS and stuff. S3 Neo in the other hand it's a midrange device in the level of Galaxy Grand series. It was made by Samsung because S3 had gigantic popularity even today so people can get something little bit improved ?(*coughs* i9305 *coughs*). S3 Neo comes with Snapdragon 400 with misses some documentation like Nfc and FMRADIO stuff. Also as it's a midrange device and has nothing interesting compared to S3 so that causes Dev's to overlook our device.
I bought this device for 60 euros I really enjoy it that much hope too to get more development (even though I broke the glass and the vol- button)
Back on thread: I tried On7 Marshmallow, got it on boot animation but restarts for unknown reason and logcat is nowhere to be seen ?.
Στάλθηκε από το SM-G903M μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
SnapDrag910 said:
It just really bugs me to see that the SGS3 {GT-I9300} Having Android N and Android MM ROMS. It feels like our device has very less amount of ROMS compared to the SGS3...
All the devs who do this are greatly appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See this post for lineage ROM S3 Neo
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s3-neo/general/rom-lineage-os-gt-i9300i-t3568677
m.h.k.jahromi said:
Bro we have great developers like @[email protected]@I'[email protected] [email protected] .etc
But the one of reasons is it,real life is important.
developers can't earn money with make rom for free for us many of them have school or job.
and one of the reasons is it,S3 Neo's driver is old and compile rom for it is really hard,we are just see S3 have mm or n roms but we don't think who made it?! how made it?! why made it?!
after all we should accept after @LGaljo or after Motion Rom our device is dead.maybe @n1kolaa make cm13 for our device but now cm13 is old too...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. You are right
I was being immature
And wanted it so badly,nothing else.