Related
Hi!
I wanted a 'stock' AOKP Build and couldn't find so I tried and built one...
Thanks to LorDClockaN (IceColdAOKP) for the device specific files and the vendor setup for AOKP.
So you get a pure AOKP synced with the latest AOKP changes with device specific fixes for the One X.
Changelog
same as AOKP - plus:
- Fixed Black-Screen on rotation
- Fixed button timeout (fix by tbalden)
2012/07/18
- Fixed some issues with Camera/Videorecording
I want to keep the main packages the same as in AOKP and just integrate device specific fixes - so no added features
Installation
Flash ROM
Flash GApps
Reboot into fastboot
Flash boot.img via fastboot (fastboot flash boot boot.img)
Reboot
Bonus: No wipe required when you are currently on IceColdAOKP ;-)
Downloads
Download (in sync with AOKP Milestone 6)
GApps can be found here
Sources and Changes/Commits can be found here
I recommend flashing the GPS tweak from here
thanks for your hard work.
it would be better to work with LorDClockaN ?
Tutorial.
But icedcold is pure aokp? What makes this different?
offenberg said:
But icedcold is pure aokp? What makes this different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IceCold has some features added that are not (or at least not now) in AOKP - like profiles for example...
karoodee said:
IceCold has some features added that are not (or at least not now) in AOKP - like profiles for example...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. But the issues list is exactly the same?
Should be mostly the Same, yes...
Which device and vendor trees is this built off?
EDIT: Nevermind, realised you've stated it in the OP.
Not being funny here and apologies if you think i am having a dig but you need to write abit more info on what you are sharing here...first you can give us even a tiny changelog please and if so as well few screenshots....
cause you are sharing something in the development section so as far as i know you can be sharing anything...so it is for the benefit of us the users who want to download this and also for the safety of your back so at least you showed the user what they are actually flashing on there phones...
and welcome it is always nice to have more roms but if you can add the above to the OP you will be good to go and hoping for more AOKP magic
Goku80 said:
Not being funny here and apologies if you think i am having a dig but you need to write abit more info on what you are sharing here...first you can give us even a tiny changelog please and if so as well few screenshots....
cause you are sharing something in the development section so as far as i know you can be sharing anything...so it is for the benefit of us the users who want to download this and also for the safety of your back so at least you showed the user what they are actually flashing on there phones...
and welcome it is always nice to have more roms but if you can add the above to the OP you will be good to go and hoping for more AOKP magic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey there!
Updated the Post and added more info. Are screenshots madatory? The ROM looks exactly like any other AOKP 0_o If I have to I will add some...
Not discouraging development but man, I really really wish people would work together and come up with - in the very least - an "official" AOSP/AOKP XDA ROM. Not CM9, not Trip's (no offense Trip) not any other variant.
Just get together and work on fixes together. These AOKP ROMs all over the place are confusing a lot of people.
karoodee said:
Hey there!
Updated the Post and added more info. Are screenshots madatory? The ROM looks exactly like any other AOKP 0_o If I have to I will add some...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No dude it's not mandatory but just check others thread and you see what I am talking about. Anyway thanks for changing it.
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Quiksilver78 said:
Not discouraging development but man, I really really wish people would work together and come up with - in the very least - an "official" AOSP/AOKP XDA ROM. Not CM9, not Trip's (no offense Trip) not any other variant.
Just get together and work on fixes together. These AOKP ROMs all over the place are confusing a lot of people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As there are lot of AOKP roms so are Sense ROMs like ARHD, Viper etc. Why dont you ask them to work together also instead of just singling out AOKP?
No offense just suggesting.
karoodee said:
Hi!
I wanted a 'stock' AOKP Build and couldn't find so I tried and built one...
Thanks to LorDClockaN (IceColdAOKP) for the device specific files and the vendor setup for AOKP.
So you get a pure AOKP synced with the latest AOKP changes with device specific fixes for the One X.
Changelog
same as AOKP - plus:
- Fixed Black-Screen on rotation
- Fixed button timeout (fix by tbalden)
I want to keep the main packages the same as in AOKP and just integrate device specific fixes - so no added features
Installation
Flash ROM
Flash GApps
Reboot into fastboot
Flash boot.img via fastboot (fastboot flash boot boot.img)
Reboot
Bonus: No wipe required when you are currently on IceColdAOKP ;-)
Downloads
Download (in sync with AOKP Milestone 6)
GApps can be found here
Sources and Changes/Commits can be found here
I recommend flashing the GPS tweak from here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First one to hit thanks Nice work, will try it out
Sent from my HTC One X
Is the default launcher in this modifiable? Or we need a custom one for that?
Sent from my HTC One X
theDroidfanatic said:
Is the default launcher in this modifiable? Or we need a custom one for that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Launcher2 and NovaLauncher is included but you can install and use whichever you want
gani_d said:
As there are lot of AOKP roms so are Sense ROMs like ARHD, Viper etc. Why dont you ask them to work together also instead of just singling out AOKP?
No offense just suggesting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He did, he said AOKP/AOSP, CM9 is covered under AOSP, and AOKP is just a derivative of CM9 anyway, building AOKP isn't any different than CM9 as the device specific stuff is the same.
The (seemingly) most efficient solution would be for everyone wishing to develop for an AOSP-based ROM to join tbalden and mdeejay in their TeamNDVRu organisation on GitHub.
gani_d said:
As there are lot of AOKP roms so are Sense ROMs like ARHD, Viper etc. Why dont you ask them to work together also instead of just singling out AOKP?
No offense just suggesting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That wouldn't work, since they are in a way competing and all have different stuff, some are stock, but fast, some are based on leaked bases, some are totally customizable (LeeDrOiD and ViperX) etc., but CM9 is... well, CM9, so it actually makes *sense* (pun intended xP) to work on one rom
Sent from my HTC One X
whats the main diferences between IceCold and this rom ?
the profiles .. and .. ?
gani_d said:
As there are lot of AOKP roms so are Sense ROMs like ARHD, Viper etc. Why dont you ask them to work together also instead of just singling out AOKP?
No offense just suggesting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apples and Oranges.
Sense ROMs are based off HTC's official release. There is no such official release from Google for the HTC One X unfortunately. So until that happens, I just wish everyone could band together and release a pure AOSP ROM and THEN have developers apply their tweaks to their hearts' content, kanging the hell out of the AOSP build until they're blue in the face.
So far, these AOKP releases are like a virus. They all attach to one device tree, bugs and all, and virtually release the same (seemingly) ROM. When someone squashes a bug, they all copy it. It's just redundant work that could be channeled towards finishing one master build rather than having multiple ones floating around.
To give some food for thought, this is like having the CyanogenMod developers working individually to release their own version of CM9 or CM10.
Apologies for derailing this thread.
I thought of developing a kernel so that i can use it with my CM11 that im going to port shortly. I thought I'll compile the stock kernel from source itself. I use android pre-built tool chain (arm-eabi-4.6)
I get a lot of compiler errors on stock kernel without any modifications itself...
Do i need to change my tool chain?
Sent from my One V using XDA Free mobile app
I never tried to build the stock kernel, but I think they did it with the android 4.0 toolchain.
To run CM, you need a CM-Kernel. You have to port things from the stock or a custom kernel (like Hellboy by maxwen) to the cm11 kernel.
Try to use rastomanchiks kernel sources (https://github.com/rastomanchik/android_kernel_htc_primou). This kernel is mostly working, stable and has a good battery life now.
I'd also like to build cm11, but my download speed is to slow to download the sources.
Exactly. Even my download speed is slow. And i have a cap also. After 8GB, my download speed drastically decreases. It takes ages to sync the sources...
Sent from my One V using XDA Free mobile app
How different is Cm kernel from stock? I mean what changes should i make?
Sent from my One V using XDA Free mobile app
Cm needs many features which aren't included in the stock kernel and also you should get ION memory allocator working.
Help
jonas2790 said:
Cm needs many features which aren't included in the stock kernel and also you should get ION memory allocator working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. How do I port?
What happened to your CM12 project?
hehaichi said:
Yeah. How do I port?
What happened to your CM12 project?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started working on cm12 again yesterday and finally have cm11 sources now, so expect a cm11 build in some days
I can't help you with porting, because all the porting work was done by rastomanchik and I chatted with him. You'd have to ask him about this, but he wasn't online the last weeks and can't speak english without google translator.
jonas2790 said:
I started working on cm12 again yesterday and finally have cm11 sources now, so expect a cm11 build in some days
I can't help you with porting, because all the porting work was done by rastomanchik and I chatted with him. You'd have to ask him about this, but he wasn't online the last weeks and can't speak english without google translator.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I insist on porting myself so that I can learn building properly.
Actually these things are also interesting.. fixing bugs and all...
Have series of exams till May end. I cant build properly until then. I thought why not learn something..
Where did you learn about building and other stuff. Also I want to build the device tree on my own.
If you could specify some sources to learn, that would be grateful!
hehaichi said:
Actually I insist on porting myself so that I can learn building properly.
Actually these things are also interesting.. fixing bugs and all...
Have series of exams till May end. I cant build properly until then. I thought why not learn something..
Where did you learn about building and other stuff. Also I want to build the device tree on my own.
If you could specify some sources to learn, that would be grateful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is exactly the same point of view I had when I started some months ago
Sadly, there isn't much documentation about own device trees and own kernels out there.
There also is no reference device tree, so every dev does it in his own way. I'm always trying to have a clean, easy device tree and use the CM ones as a reference.
You can find some tutorials about building cm, but only with downloading a ready-to-use device config and kernel.
I just played around with it one or two weeks and learned the most.
If you have enough time, please at least try to get into this stuff, maybe we can get cm12 running.
You can reach me on irc in the channel #hov on freenode.
jonas2790 said:
This is exactly the same point of view I had when I started some months ago
Sadly, there isn't much documentation about own device trees and own kernels out there.
There also is no reference device tree, so every dev does it in his own way. I'm always trying to have a clean, easy device tree and use the CM ones as a reference.
You can find some tutorials about building cm, but only with downloading a ready-to-use device config and kernel.
I just played around with it one or two weeks and learned the most.
If you have enough time, please at least try to get into this stuff, maybe we can get cm12 running.
You can reach me on irc in the channel #hov on freenode.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have sufficient time only after May. Till then I'll have to do some research and learn the basics.
I saw on the CM wiki page, it says you can run a prebuilt kernel also... So would it work if we could tweak the stock kernel a bit?
And how do I apply patches to the kernel?
hehaichi said:
I have sufficient time only after May. Till then I'll have to do some research and learn the basics.
I saw on the CM wiki page, it says you can run a prebuilt kernel also... So would it work if we could tweak the stock kernel a bit?
And how do I apply patches to the kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you can use a prebuilt kernel, but it will only work if the kernel supports you cm version.
You apply patches to a kernel by changing files or directories in the kernel. For example you can use another fs module (maybe with more functions) by copy and pasting the folder for the module from another kernel. The problem is, the new module may require some functions your kernel does not have so it won't compile.
Hey i had mailed rastomanchik and he said 3.4.x kernel is an impossibility for cm11? Why?
Sent from my One V
hehaichi said:
Hey i had mailed rastomanchik and he said 3.4.x kernel is an impossibility for cm11? Why?
Sent from my One V
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. It would be much, much, much work.
2. I think there are some device-specific drivers that only work with 3.0
I'm ready to do that work only if i knew how to...
Sent from my One V
hehaichi said:
I'm ready to do that work only if i knew how to...
Sent from my One V
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to get into it yourself or talk with people who know about kernel developement, I'm also new to android developement.
This is a test build I take no responsibility for what this may or may not do to your device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NEED TESTERS
currently i don't have the device to test i will be getting my device in the next week .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Install CWM Recovery
2. Do Full Wipe If coming from another ROM
3. Flash ROM
4. Flash Google Apps (my recommendation is to install minipal gapps due to /system partition size limits)
5. Reboot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
]Not Booting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Code:
[B]Source[/B]
Here are the device tree :
Device Tree (from cm13 Nexus 9) : https://github.com/vickdu31/android_device_xiaomi_mocha
Kernel Tree (from Xiaomi KK) : https://github.com/vickdu31/android_kernel_xiaomi_mocha
Vendor Tree (old Xiaomi KK) : https://github.com/vickdu31/android_vendor_xiaomi_mocha
Thank you
@faust93 for cwm
XDA:DevDB Information
CM-13, ROM for the Xiaomi Mi Pad
Contributors
Rohit99, tank0412, vickdu31
ROM OS Version: 6.0.x Marshmallow
Based On: CyanogenMod
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2016-12-10
Last Updated 2016-12-13
Reserved
Edit 1:initial build didn't boot for me, no adb can't get log
Ok im gonna try it.
If you want, i can leave logcat for you
OoSTARTERoO said:
Ok im gonna try it.
If you want, i can leave logcat for you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can get logcat? Try please.
Ofc, it doesn't boot. And don't create threads without testing.
Sudeep Duhoon said:
Can get logcat? Try please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
unfortunately....I couldn't get logcat too...
Sudeep Duhoon said:
Can get logcat? Try please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we can't get logcat. It doesn't boot, i mean there are problems with kernel or init scripts or both. Kernel needs patches.
Nihhaar said:
Ofc, it doesn't boot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I thought
Prebuilt kernel from cm11
Sudeep Duhoon said:
As I thought
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey can i use prebuilt kernel from cm11 source @Nihhaar
Rohit99 said:
hey can i use prebuilt kernel from cm11 source @Nihhaar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Always try to build kernel with source. I think you can't, but you can try.
Please edit the link in OP, its me who miswrote it... : /android_device_xioami_mocha --> /android_device_xiaomi_mocha
You need to fix up SELinux and the init scripts. Taking a shield tablet device tree, renaming things to mocha and changing the fstab isn't enough. As far as I can tell the shieldtablet device tree also has dependency on a shield common tree. There's also no value in creating a new thread each time you push new commits
Our kernel from Xiaomi is also pretty useless without commit history. The device tree is also from shield tablet, not Nexus 9.
We also have a tree for building TWRP with OmniROM that you can compile TWRP 3.0.2.0 with.
What kernel repo is upstream one for tegra android? Like CAF for quallcom.
I've tried to merge xiaomi changes on l4t kernel https://github.com/HighwayStar/android_kernel_xiaomi_mocha
Merged dts files and arch/boot/march-tegra with some required drivers, but still cant boot it. Found somewhere here that l4t kernels is not for android, but for GNU/Linux, but what kernel is for android?
Cyanogenmod's shield kernel?
highwaystar_ru said:
What kernel repo is upstream one for tegra android? Like CAF for quallcom.
I've tried to merge xiaomi changes on l4t kernel https://github.com/HighwayStar/android_kernel_xiaomi_mocha
Merged dts files and arch/boot/march-tegra with some required drivers, but still cant boot it. Found somewhere here that l4t kernels is not for android, but for GNU/Linux, but what kernel is for android?
Cyanogenmod's shield kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/linux-3.10.git
I used rel-tn8-l-r7-shieldtablet8 to make a start on doing this. You could also use android_kernel_shield from CyanogenMod repo as it comes from the same place. But it will have a lot of extra commits for things not useful for mocha.
Here's what I have so far:
https://github.com/harrynowl/nvidia_tegra-3.10
Harrynowl said:
git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/linux-3.10.git
I used rel-tn8-l-r7-shieldtablet8 to make a start on doing this. You could also use android_kernel_shield from CyanogenMod repo as it comes from the same place. But it will have a lot of extra commits for things not useful for mocha.
Here's what I have so far:
https://github.com/harrynowl/nvidia_tegra-3.10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, intresting, cloned same url, but started other branch l4t/l4t-r21.5.
What status of your tree? Cant boot? We need minimal bootable kernel to be able to get dmesg and make further progress.
highwaystar_ru said:
Oh, intresting, cloned same url, but started other branch l4t/l4t-r21.5.
What status of your tree? Cant boot? We need minimal bootable kernel to be able to get dmesg and make further progress.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Untested, been doing device bring up. That kernel won't work yet anyway it's missing atmel, synaptic and battery firmware. (Plus the code that goes with it)
Some devs have one that gets to recovery but only 1 CPU core can come online and the CPU gets a bit hot. Unfortunately their commit history is hard to follow so I've not had a proper look at it yet
My my...it's been a while since I've seen a cringe-worthy dev thread on XDA. So OP just used the device tree from Nexus 9 (a 64-bit device with a different processor and nothing in common with the Mi Pad other than the fact that they use Nvidia SoCs and are both tablets), unmodified KITKAT kernel sources from Xiaomi (which takes work to make it boot, even on KK) and KITKAT userspace blobs to compile the ROM, and for some reason decided to share it without testing. The 10-post rule is meant to keep such people out of the development sub-forums, but obviously that's not working.
I do not understand why the moderators are allowing this thread to remain open. It's just a thread by a wannabe dev offering a non-bootable ROM that has the potential to brick the devices of many newbies who may decide to try this.
This thread is even more useless than the other "DEVS-ONLY" thread someone else made. Honestly, the entire Mi Pad forum is filled with people who either expect Android 7.1.1 to magically appear on their tabs just because Xiaomi released outdated kernel sources or just wanna create threads like this for the "thanks or whatever". The never ask for ETA rule seems to just float over their heads.
Now to some useful information. I believe, even if we patch the kernel enough for it to theoretically boot cm13, it probably won't, considering the outdated userspace blobs for the Mi Pad. Unless someone has the knowledge to take their tab apart and figure out how to get UART data, it will be virtually impossible for the mi pad kernel to boot any new version of Android. I heard another interesting approach taken by some russian devs at the Xiaomi forums. They've managed to port the kernel from the Nvidia shield (and apparently it's booting). Now this would mean we can use the userspace blobs from the Shield to at least get the ROM booting (most peripherals won't work, but that's step 2). I do not know whether they use GitHub or if they've even open-sourced their work, but now we know that it's possible, so that could be a possible method of approach.
EDIT: LOL. I just read the OP again. The "dev" expects donations to help him work harder. This from a person who posted his way into somehow compiling his first Android build without even having the damn device.
drakonizer said:
My my...it's been a while since I've seen a cringe-worthy dev thread on XDA. So OP just used the device tree from Nexus 9 (a 64-bit device with a different processor and nothing in common with the Mi Pad other than the fact that they use Nvidia SoCs and are both tablets), unmodified KITKAT kernel sources from Xiaomi (which takes work to make it boot, even on KK) and KITKAT userspace blobs to compile the ROM, and for some reason decided to share it without testing. The 10-post rule is meant to keep such people out of the development sub-forums, but obviously that's not working.
I do not understand why the moderators are allowing this thread to remain open. It's just a thread by a wannabe dev offering a non-bootable ROM that has the potential to brick the devices of many newbies who may decide to try this.
This thread is even more useless than the other "DEVS-ONLY" thread someone else made. Honestly, the entire Mi Pad forum is filled with people who either expect Android 7.1.1 to magically appear on their tabs just because Xiaomi released outdated kernel sources or just wanna create threads like this for the "thanks or whatever". The never ask for ETA rule seems to just float over their heads.
Now to some useful information. I believe, even if we patch the kernel enough for it to theoretically boot cm13, it probably won't, considering the outdated userspace blobs for the Mi Pad. Unless someone has the knowledge to take their tab apart and figure out how to get UART data, it will be virtually impossible for the mi pad kernel to boot any new version of Android. I heard another interesting approach taken by some russian devs at the Xiaomi forums. They've managed to port the kernel from the Nvidia shield (and apparently it's booting). Now this would mean we can use the userspace blobs from the Shield to at least get the ROM booting (most peripherals won't work, but that's step 2). I do not know whether they use GitHub or if they've even open-sourced their work, but now we know that it's possible, so that could be a possible method of approach.
EDIT: LOL. I just read the OP again. The "dev" expects donations to help him work harder. This from a person who posted his way into somehow compiling his first Android build without even having the damn device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, this device has no development threads. Only 2 give me thanks and here's my donation link threads.
They have indeed used GitHub, but I don't believe they want to share the repo just yet so I won't post it publicly. It has many problems to sort and also sadly, they didn't keep the commit history from Nvidia as it was initialised via zip DL. It does boot to recovery though.
Harrynowl said:
I agree, this device has no development threads. Only 2 give me thanks and here's my donation link threads.
They have indeed used GitHub, but I don't believe they want to share the repo just yet so I won't post it publicly. It has many problems to sort and also sadly, they didn't keep the commit history from Nvidia as it was initialised via zip DL. It does boot to recovery though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh! I didn't realize we were talking about the same person/team. I'd love to start developing for this device. In fact, I'm working on KEXEC-hardboot and Multirom right now, but I'd like to follow what you guys are doing and contribute as much as I can. Is there an IRC channel/IM app you guys use for communication? If so, I'd appreciate it if you could PM the info.
CyanogenMod was brilliant for old devices. You could take CM9, tweak it around, and install it on something like the Galaxy Ace GT-S5830. You could breathe life into an old device.
Will there be older versions of LineageOS to accomplish the same thing? For example, an Android 4.2 Jelly Bean LineageOS? Or will it go no lower than Nougat 7.1?
Doofitator said:
CyanogenMod was brilliant for old devices. You could take CM9, tweak it around, and install it on something like the Galaxy Ace GT-S5830. You could breathe life into an old device.
Will there be older versions of LineageOS to accomplish the same thing? For example, an Android 4.2 Jelly Bean LineageOS? Or will it go no lower than Nougat 7.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any device that was actively being developed when CM ended should be picked up by Lineage OS. If the device was no longer supported by CM, it is not likely to be supported now.
It goes back to 6.0.1 but no further.
It will do both, apparently.....
Someone appears to have updated the cm-12.1 branch, FWIW. I'm wondering if they're slowly working backwards.
Sent from my HTC One M8 using Tapatalk
MJPollard said:
Someone appears to have updated the cm-12.1 branch, FWIW. I'm wondering if they're slowly working backwards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be my assumption since it's probably a lot easier to find people with knowledge to build CM13/12.1 than people with building knowledge for CM7 per say.
LilAnt530 said:
That would be my assumption since it's probably a lot easier to find people with knowledge to build CM13/12.1 than people with building knowledge for CM7 per say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Funny you should say that, because I had to do just that very thing. I own an old phone (Motorola Atrix 4G) that never officially got support beyond CM7, so I've created my own custom CM7 for it (I'm using it as a glorified media player, but it's also allowed me to hone up on my Android ROM tinkering skills). When CM became LinOS, I created a Github organization (https://github.com/CM-Archive) to preserve the CM "gingerbread" branch, and found that there were a few things that need to be changed in order to make a clean compile. I'd offer to bring the "gingerbread" branch on LineageOS up to date for those few people who really need the CM7 code, as I've already done the work and know what needs to be changed, but as I've never made any contributions to CM or any ROM project, I don't know how to go about it. Can anyone tell me what I need to do? Something easy to follow, not "Get the frimfram and keloplotz the FTL missengibble on the gonfropple."
MJPollard said:
Funny you should say that, because I had to do just that very thing. I own an old phone (Motorola Atrix 4G) that never officially got support beyond CM7, so I've created my own custom CM7 for it (I'm using it as a glorified media player, but it's also allowed me to hone up on my Android ROM tinkering skills). When CM became LinOS, I created a Github organization (https://github.com/CM-Archive) to preserve the CM "gingerbread" branch, and found that there were a few things that need to be changed in order to make a clean compile. I'd offer to bring the "gingerbread" branch on LineageOS up to date for those few people who really need the CM7 code, as I've already done the work and know what needs to be changed, but as I've never made any contributions to CM or any ROM project, I don't know how to go about it. Can anyone tell me what I need to do? Something easy to follow, not "Get the frimfram and keloplotz the FTL missengibble on the gonfropple."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's pretty epic dude! I have an LG Lucid vs840 from that had a CM9 out fot it was considering doing the same thing. As for helping them with their efforts I have no idea where to start.
But I do have a question, do you think it'd be very hard to update the cm7 cm9 or cm11 to Marshmallow devices? This might sound foolish but im still curious lol
The CM repo is moved wholesale to LineageOS, so if you know how to build, you could still build any version you like from the new source, provided that the older version was there previously in CM. I've built Lineage 13 (CM13) for several of my devices just now since I still need Xposed.
You can't expect any useful updates for <CM12.1 though, as CM had stopped working on them long ago. Not worth the extra effort of maintaining them, plus unfixable security holes.
Not looking to maintain them, simply to update them to compile from the LinOS repo. Specifically, the default.xml in the android package needs the references to CyanogenMod changed to LineageOS, and other references need to be changed as well. Once that's done, nothing further needs to be done.
Sent from my HTC One M8 using Tapatalk
Hi im looking for lineageOS 13.0-20170513-nightly-x2 this must be the last official version of that rom right?
i got it at my device but delete the zip and i dont found any working download link...
did someone got it for me please?
thx chris
jhedfors said:
Any device that was actively being developed when CM ended should be picked up by Lineage OS. If the device was no longer supported by CM, it is not likely to be supported now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You say that, but there was CM for my old 2011 LG phone but I would be tremendously surprised if a LOS ROM ever shows up because there doesn't seem to be any active development for that device anymore. Makes me sad because I would love to have LOS on it (and security updates newer than 2012) but I wouldn't bank on it... the newest CM ROM I can find for it is from 2015.
I'm trying to build Stock AOSP (Not LineageOS) straight from Google for the OnePlus 3/3T?
I searched for a guide, but haven't found one.
Thanks in advance!
You can't
AOSP source is available for Pixel and Nexus devices
But you can build CAF for OnePlus 3, is clean and close to AOSP
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
Since you're doing it on your own I suggest using a rom here as a base GZR recently posted GZOSP a Oreo base for Developers to use as a base for their roms you should check it out it's a great start if you're new to development
liam_davenport said:
Since you're doing it on your own I suggest using a rom here as a base GZR recently posted GZOSP a Oreo base for Developers to use as a base for their roms you should check it out it's a great start if you're new to development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be doing him a great dis-service. Buy using anothers base you dont learn everything you need and rely on others code way too much. Not to mention if a cm/los issue happens (underlying bug in their base code so you are waiting for them to fix it) This is the reason that whole project will not work.
Starting from scratch is a great start and a place everyone should start
... If he's never built a rom before then starting from scratch is most definitely *not* the place to start. GZOSP would likely be the best place to start as at least you can sync all and it actually builds. Would learn a ton just by figuring out how to remove all the GroundZero naming to make it your "own" rom.
There aren't any default AOSP device tree's available for OP3(you'd *have* to use someone else's code and it would likely require manually fixing it to build) so can't start there really, and good luck trying to find which branch(s) of caf and which repo's you need to build.. Writing device trees from scratch by yourself for aosp is drunkeness unless you've done it before and *know* what you're doing.
--
TLDR: There's no guide because it's not a thing currently. Would start with GZOSP if I were you.
HolyAngel said:
... If he's never built a rom before then starting from scratch is most definitely *not* the place to start. GZOSP would likely be the best place to start as at least you can sync all and it actually builds. Would learn a ton just by figuring out how to remove all the GroundZero naming to make it your "own" rom.
There aren't any default AOSP device tree's available for OP3(you'd *have* to use someone else's code and it would likely require manually fixing it to build) so can't start there really, and good luck trying to find which branch(s) of caf and which repo's you need to build.. Writing device trees from scratch by yourself for aosp is drunkeness unless you've done it before and *know* what you're doing.
--
TLDR: There's no guide because it's not a thing currently. Would start with GZOSP if I were you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean in Biology, you don't start at the organism, you start at the atom. You start at the base and build from there.