Related
I have an Epic 4g Touch (SGSII), and am wondering about screen burn-in.
I already know it's possible to burn-in our Super AMOLED+ screens, but I'm wondering what kind of things I can do to prevent it, and if doing certain things will accelerate the burn-in or not.
1. I'm mostly indoors, so I always keep the brightness set to 30%. This should be sufficiently low to slow the burn-in, correct?
2. I use ADW Launcher Pro, but I don't have it auto-hiding the notification bar. My screen is on between 1-3 hours per day. Should I be using the auto-hide feature?
3. I was thinking about using the clock in dock mode at night while I charge my phone. I set the brightness to the lowest possible setting, and I know that after a few minutes, the phone sets a black background with the clock text being yellow and moving around the screen every minute or so. With all of that in mind, is that going to be bad for the burn-in?
4. This is kind of related to #3. If a pixel is pure black, is it susceptible to burn-in?
Thanks in advance to all replies. I'm pretty tech savvy, but kind of a noob when it comes to these advanced screen questions.
Awesome, thanks. Wasn't aware of that strobe trick; I'll have to start doing that
newalker91 said:
My suggestion to reduce any and all burn-in is the same trick used to fix stuck pixels on LCD screens. Download a strobe light application that uses multiple colors, and once every couple of weeks allow your phone to sit while your screen rapidly flickers through all of the colors for about 10-15 minutes. This will wash away any burn-in that may be building.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just had a thought...
Isn't burn-in caused by pixels becoming physically damaged? So how can a strobe light app that uses these damaged pixels "wash away" burn-in?
Not trying to be rude or anything; I definitely appreciate everyone's knowledge on this subject. I guess I'm just looking for more information.
personally i wouldn't worry too much about burn in. things move around enough on these phones to mostly prevent it.
and for what it's worth i still use my original samsung launch day moment as a clock for the last year or so and have yet to notice any burn in at all (and that clock doesn't bounce around) sometimes during the day i still use it as a media player or terminal device too. screen still looks awesome (not compared to the gsii but)
granted the moment was super amoled not super amoled+ but heh....
newalker91 said:
No, the Samsung Moment was sure not Super AMOLED. It was LCD. I've taken probably a thousand of them apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you sure? the og box i have on my shelf def says amoled.
EDIT. ok maybe its not SUPER AMOLED. But it def is AMOLED.
"3.2-inch AMOLED display"
newalker91 said:
Regular AMOLED displays are basically the same as LCD screens. They function completely different than Super AMOLED.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the only difference between amoled and super amoled is the PenTile RGBG pixel matrix is replaced with a common RGB subpixels arrangement, going from eight to twelve subpixels in a group, resulting in finer details. The screen technology is also brighter, thinner and 18% more energy efficient. super amoled+ adds more of the same just brighter lighter and less power hungry.
yes any led panel (amoled and super amoled) is just an led panel thats true.
its the material used for the led catalyst (organic) and position of the film in the glass (under not over) that differentiate them.
but then again it's really not an issue. and i could be wrong.
all i know is that my moment has been left on in situations that i know would cause burn in on any normal lcd style device and has never been an issue.
for the length of time that most people keep a phone (2years or so) i personally wouldn't worry about it.
that being said OLED pixels degrade with use (become dimmer, and the different colour pixels degrade at different rates), but according to most screen datasheets ive seen we are talking 15-20,000 hours of screen on use for a noticeable difference.
just ask yourself this do you ever see screen burn in on display phones that are left running screen on all day?
but didn't mean to push the thread offtopic
I have seen burn in on my Captivate, so yes it will happen.
yep it will happen in certain circumstances i just went looking through my old amoled info and found this link
http://data.4dsystems.com.au/downloads/micro-OLED/Docs/4D_AMOLED_Presentation.pdf
this has a lot of good info but is out of date.
what we get isn't true burn in (although the outcome is similar)
what we see as burn in is really the degradation of pixel intensity and has alot to do with the colors the screen must display. so even a moving clock is degrading the pixels just that it's degrading them (hopefully evenly across the screen) the super amoled+ screens seem to have added a white led to the mix to help prevent burn in from white screens/txt and lower power consumption.
it also appears some colors are better for screen life than others with blue having the shortest life.
keep in mind if your interested in looking at the link that it is describing the first gen amoled screen and much has been improved since then.
from this i would also make the assumption that flashing the screen doesn't unstick any pixels it just burns them all out a bit.
i'll shut up now
Well I've done some more research too, and found that what mjcollum said is pretty much the case for us. We don't actually get a "burn-in", but rather the pixels degrade and leave a sort of "ghost" image where the degradation is worse than surrounding areas.
The "half life" of older AMOLED pixels was 14k hours, but most articles I've encountered mention that technology has improved, ergo the pixels should last a bit longer in our Super AMOLED+ displays.
But still, there will definitely be some degree of degradation. I suppose it's a lot like sex; leaving the screen off will keep your pixels the safest, but it's a lot more fun to use what you've got
I only wonder if a dim display degrades slower than a brighter display... ?
interesting. good to know.
does this apply to qhd displays like the photon also? or is this only a amoled thing?
newalker91 said:
Regular AMOLED displays are basically the same as LCD screens. They function completely different than Super AMOLED.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The moment was AMOLED... it had a seperate digitizer.
The Galaxy S was Super AMOLED it incorporated the digitizer with the pentile matrix.
The Galaxy S II is Super AMOLED+ which replaces the pentile layot with the standard RGB grid.
To prevent burn in limit screen on time, no need to do any crazy pixel unsticking tricks as it'll just reduce the vibrancy of your screen.
thanks warlord good to know.
one thing to think about is even if the pixel halflife is only still 14k hours
365(days) x 24(hours) = 8,7650 hours if you left it on for a full year.
so i say just use the thing.
---------- Post added at 10:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:13 PM ----------
SpaceMonky said:
interesting. good to know.
does this apply to qhd displays like the photon also? or is this only a amoled thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i could be wrong but i believe the qhd part just references the resolution.
and the photon has a normal style lcd display. so if it got burn in at all it would be the normal lcd style.
mjcollum said:
i could be wrong but i believe the qhd part just references the resolution.
and the photon has a normal style lcd display. so if it got burn in at all it would be the normal lcd style.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're correct, qHD only references the resolution, not the display type. Which is funny, because a lot of Google searches are for "qHD vs Super AMOLED+". I think people are just trying to pit their Droid Bionics against our SGSIIs
Hi all.
Last night I accidentally discovered the burnt pixels on my one year old Focus screen The sights of high contrasts Metro-style icons (such as IE, phone and marketplace) are visible on the white background as a darker "shadows" (actual color is like a light-light yellow, close to white). These "shadows" are visible on the white background in the dark only.
It's not a big deal but I'm kinda disappointed
So, my conclusions are:
- high contrasts Metro-style tiles on the home screen are evil, at least for AMOLED screens. However live tiles (probably) can solve the issue (he-he, just thought - may be it's a real reason why MS implemented and pushing live tiles? Kidding );
- periodical changing of tile location on the home screen also can help;
- using AMOLED handsets for development is not so good. The best practice is to keep AMOLED screens off all the time (what is not acceptable for development).
My Focus is one year old, but I don't have any burn in problems some reported. Granted, I don't leave my phone screen on for extended periods, but my live tile arrangement really never changed.
Now that I have the HTC Titan, I have no regrets with the SLCD screen. The colors seem more natural to me. While AMOLED screens certainly have a "pop" factor, it's not a must-have for me.
This is a well known issue that you have to live with: AMOLED will get screen burn-in if it is use for an extend period of time.
I know most of the Android Galaxy phones also have screen burn-in especially on the status bar.
My own Samsung Focus developed screen burn-in (esp. Metro buttons) after only three months of use.
day2die said:
This is a well known issue that you have to live with: AMOLED will get screen burn-in if it is use for an extend period of time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about Super AMOLED screens, is problem still persists?
I notice things on my Omnia 7. Normally if i've had a menu open for a minute or more and i switch to a black background i can see a kind of greyish imprint of the last displayed icons.
sensboston said:
How about Super AMOLED screens, is problem still persists?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SAMOLED has it as well. I'm sure it was a big issue in the focus forums last year
The biggest disadvantage of an amoled screen is when you move to another type of screen, and notice just how gray blacks can be. Using my old focus and having the blacks blend with the bezel was so visually pleasing, and the colors had so much pop. I hear that the colors aren't as accurate, but what does that mean really? 90% of what I look at on a phone is arbitrary colors anyway; how would I ever know that the blue tiles are really supposed to be one shade vs. another, and why would I care?
(btw yes, I had the same screen burn-in problem on my focus)
Yeah i had a major burn in problem with my Omnia 7, I think it was something to do with the bright blue theme i used, i have pictures here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=973337
use a screen saver?
Oh ya.. nevermind
Wow... I had no idea of this...
I have a Galaxy S I9000 (as well as an LG Quantum) and luckily it hasn't burnt in...
Is this a really wide spread problem?
renatofontes said:
I have a Galaxy S I9000 (as well as an LG Quantum) and luckily it hasn't burnt in...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to look at your screen in darkness (set white background on the fullscreen first), then say "luckily"
sensboston said:
How about Super AMOLED screens, is problem still persists?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is particularly bad on Super AMOLED screens.
Super AMOLED is still AMOLED.
My Vibrant, if I turn my screen on to the home screen and let it sit there for 10 seconds and then open another app, I can see the shadows on the home screen superimposed onto the app that's running. It's very noticeable, and gets irksome after a while. You won't see that on LCD screens.
The status bar is burnt in, which is noticeable when the phone is used in landscape mode because you can always see that faint strip where the status bar is (in portrait) on the side of the screen.
I set my screen timeout to 30 seconds to "preserve" the screen.
---------- Post added at 05:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:30 PM ----------
renatofontes said:
Wow... I had no idea of this...
I have a Galaxy S I9000 (as well as an LG Quantum) and luckily it hasn't burnt in...
Is this a really wide spread problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of Samsung's displays have this issue. Perhaps you just haven't noticed it, or are just fortunate
Not really widespread, and not really a "problem" per se. Just a component of the screen tech. It burns in and shadows easily.
However they have better power management than LCD screens and better brightness, viewing angles, and outdoor visibility - as well as better color saturation and reproduction. For example, I increase my Vibrant's stock battery life by like 4+ hours doing absolutely nothing but putting a true black background on the launcher...
It's a trade-off. It's worth it for someone like you who doesn't notice it, though. It's worth it even for some people who do. It really depends on how long you keep your phone, Lol. If you upgrade yearly it's not that big a deal. I can't see myself going 2 years with the Vibrant as my primary device and dealing with it, though. It's too startling to look at at times, especially after you spend a significant amount of time in one app with static UI elements and move to something else...
If you look at the AMOLED technology, it's understandable really. All the colours displayed on the screen are composed of green, red and blue sub-pixels.
In an AMOLED screen, there is no backlighting. The sub-pixels themselves generate the visible light, hence why the blacks are so black, because the black pixels are not powered on. (Think of an AMOLED screen as having thousands of tiny tiny LED's)
However the problem with AMOLED is the manufacturers could not produce a specific chemical compound for each colour that would wear evenly. For example, the blue sub pixel has a shorter lifespan than the green. When the AMOLED sub-pixels gets used, the intensity of light produced decreases, hence there is uneven wear. The pentile arrangement was to actually arrange the pixels in a way, which as the display wears, the colours look normal. When there are static pixels displayed, a certain portion of sub pixels gets used more than others, hence why you can notice it.
In an LCD, each sub-pixel is a polarizing filter, which filters out either red/blue/green and displays it or blocks it, so an LCD doesn't suffer from screen burn in as much as AMOLED and PLASMA displays.
From day one I have only ever used my phone on the lowest setting and I have alternated every few days from red/green tiles. I have never used blue due to the low lifespan of blues!!
I don't think it's a huge problem if you are smart. I made the mistake of leaving my screen on as often as possible when I first got my focus. Once I started noticing the burn in, I moved my tiles around, put my screen on 2 minute timeout, and didn't notice any more of the burn in. Just the original images.
As Big K mentions, blue pixels are the quickest to degrade, that is why you never use a blue theme with an AMOLED display. Also, displaying white actually activates some blue pixels and draws more power, so the black system theme should always be used over white.
Every AMOLED owner should know these 2 things and it is a shame that Samsung and the carriers don't do a better job of informing their customers of these simple facts.
I cringe every time I see an AMOLED phone with a white background and blue theme.
This is why I still stick to Super LCD.
I saw an S2 get a burn in within 2 months of use. Lawl.
ohgood said:
use a screen saver?
Oh ya.. nevermind
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The solution is ridiculously obvious: turn off your screen when you're done using the phone. Duh. That's obvious from a simple battery life perspective.
Of course, I see people *constantly* who just set their phones down with the screen on and walk away. Idiots.
jasongw said:
The solution is ridiculously obvious: turn off your screen when you're done using the phone. Duh. That's obvious from a simple battery life perspective.
Of course, I see people *constantly* who just set their phones down with the screen on and walk away. Idiots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The solution is not ridiculously obvious because other screen types do not suffer from thsi issue, therefor the user who moves from an LCD screen to an AMOLED has absolutely no clue that this screen type has these deficiencies. They simply assume their screen will always look the way it does as long as they take care of their phone.
That is not a bad assumption. It just doesn't jive with this display tech.
I love the deep blacks and color saturation on Samsung's AMOLED screens, but I don't think I can ever convince myself to get another one.
The issue isn't just keeping the screen on. I've always used a 30 second screen time-out on all my phones, so they aren't just sitting there a ton with an image on them. Even when you have something on the screen for like 10 seconds and move to another app you can see the image shadows on the screen. Yes, it gets pretty noticeable after a while to the point where it's constantly drawing your attention.
It's actually worse than the PenTile they use in the 1st gen SAMOLED screens, TBH.
N8ter said:
The solution is not ridiculously obvious because other screen types do not suffer from thsi issue, therefor the user who moves from an LCD screen to an AMOLED has absolutely no clue that this screen type has these deficiencies. They simply assume their screen will always look the way it does as long as they take care of their phone.
That is not a bad assumption. It just doesn't jive with this display tech.
I love the deep blacks and color saturation on Samsung's AMOLED screens, but I don't think I can ever convince myself to get another one.
The issue isn't just keeping the screen on. I've always used a 30 second screen time-out on all my phones, so they aren't just sitting there a ton with an image on them. Even when you have something on the screen for like 10 seconds and move to another app you can see the image shadows on the screen. Yes, it gets pretty noticeable after a while to the point where it's constantly drawing your attention.
It's actually worse than the PenTile they use in the 1st gen SAMOLED screens, TBH.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1st gen? It's being used in the Galaxy Nexus, too
It's a really useful point to raise, and something to think about for people using their phones for development. Automatic screen time-outs can be an annoyance when you're testing features (against a real device), and wanting to stay connected (in visual studio) to the phone for debugging info and deployment. I know I have my current phone on most of the day to test tile and page updates etc. so there's bound to be large areas of the screen remaining static for long periods of time.
It's made me think twice about getting a Lumia (which I assume would be prone too) for this reason
I'm surprised manufactures don't include info on it bundled with the phones (e.g. on not having a white background) - that's pretty irresponsible.
So I am coming from an LCD screen to the Nokia's Amoled screen and I am curious on Amoled screen is the white supposed to be a "rainbow" color? Like on my LCD screen White is well WHITE no other colors bleeding through. On this amoled screen I am see like a rainbow of colors behind the white like reds, blues, etc it's till white sort of but not as crystal white as the LCD.
Is this by design and something I should get used to? I thought Amoled was supposed to be better...
Laquox said:
So I am coming from an LCD screen to the Nokia's Amoled screen and I am curious on Amoled screen is the white supposed to be a "rainbow" color? Like on my LCD screen White is well WHITE no other colors bleeding through. On this amoled screen I am see like a rainbow of colors behind the white like reds, blues, etc it's till white sort of but not as crystal white as the LCD.
Is this by design and something I should get used to? I thought Amoled was supposed to be better...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whites on Amoled appear to be off-white. It's been this way with every Amoled device. I've never seen it to appear "rainbow" colored.
Amoled produces richer more saturated colors and outstanding black levels.
LCD and SLCD is a lot brighter than Amoled (hence the crystal white) but the black levels do not compare.
Before my 900, I was an SLCD fan. But Amoled with the clearblack looks like SLCD on steroids. Minus the lower white levels. Of course this is just my opinion.
So it's possibly just the ultra saturation bleeding through the "whites" that give it the "rainbow" effect. I don't know how else to to describe it. White is simply no white but like a multi spectrum white with other colors bleeding through.
Looking at mine right now the white looks pretty darn white.
The thing I have noticed is for instance when I bought a samsung focus I was torn between it and two HTC Devices... I forget the names. Both were SLCD. I just COULD NOT get past the washed out look of the HTC devices over the samsung.
The nokia is even richer in color than the samsung.
hx4700 Killer said:
Looking at mine right now the white looks pretty darn white.
The thing I have noticed is for instance when I bought a samsung focus I was torn between it and two HTC Devices... I forget the names. Both were SLCD. I just COULD NOT get past the washed out look of the HTC devices over the samsung.
The nokia is even richer in color than the samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed - I've had the Focus, HD7s, and now the Nokia 900 and the Nokia is so far my favorite. I feel I should point out that the 'Nokia Blue' theme is sharper than the default windows phone blue theme, making the other devices appear washed out when in fact it's the correct color.
But the ability to use the device outdoors was a huge factor in my selection, certainly.
I like all the colors in the amoled except white. White really looks washed out compared to LCD screens and this is the only disappointment I have with amoled screens.
the benefits of an amoled are color saturation, deep rich blacks, and energy consumption on non-white backgrounds
SLCD create more "accurate" colors, that some see as washed out - generally are a bit brighter (lumens) and more white whites
the amoled produce off whites - if you compare the two, but you should not really notice it on an amoled unless you compare it to a true white
also, off angles can produce a slight blue hue to the whites
to each his own - I prefer the amoleds blacks (with the WP7 metro themes), to the washed out colors of an SLCD - but that does not mean you or someone else will too
could it be that your screen might be dirty?
i know on mine if i have some water or oil on the screen it will create a prism effect, which will rainbow the colors, especially with a white screen.
personally i haven't seen whites get a rainbow effect, but they are a little dim, which could be partly due to the screen tech (amoled) and could also be the hardware dimming them intentionally to save on battery (white is a battery killer on amoled screens)
but the inky blacks and pop of color from amoled makes me not really care, as the screen looks brilliant.
and the clearblack display on the nokia is great in the sun.
rainbow colors are only suppose appear on pentile displays. this phone has a true rgb screen so i dont see why
Nissan350 said:
Whites on Amoled appear to be off-white. It's been this way with every Amoled device. I've never seen it to appear "rainbow" colored.
Amoled produces richer more saturated colors and outstanding black levels.
LCD and SLCD is a lot brighter than Amoled (hence the crystal white) but the black levels do not compare.
Before my 900, I was an SLCD fan. But Amoled with the clearblack looks like SLCD on steroids. Minus the lower white levels. Of course this is just my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AMOLED does not inherently have dim whites. Samsung just programs a dimming condition into the firmware on some its AMOLED panels that make it dim the brightness based on the % of white pixels on the screen (as a sneaky way to improve battery). The Focus S has an extra setting that lets you disable this, but the L900 does not have that setting.
drleospaceman said:
AMOLED does not inherently have dim whites. Samsung just programs a dimming condition into the firmware on some its AMOLED panels that make it dim the brightness based on the % of white pixels on the screen (as a sneaky way to improve battery). The Focus S has an extra setting that lets you disable this, but the L900 does not have that setting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. Bummer
A dim AMOLED screen also helps prolong the panel life span a lot. AMOLED screens are extremely prone to burn in. Avoid extreme brightness and avoid leave screen on for extended period.
Just remember this: it is very easy to bump up a screen's brightness (brighter back light on LCD) but it is extremely difficult to produce true blackness on a screen. The strength of AMOLE is the true black because it has no back light. Each pixels emit light. Darker black = higher contrast. No LCD can ever match the black level of an AMOLED screen.
foxbat121 said:
A dim AMOLED screen also helps prolong the panel life span a lot. AMOLED screens are extremely prone to burn in. Avoid extreme brightness and avoid leave screen on for extended period.
Just remember this: it is very easy to bump up a screen's brightness (brighter back light on LCD) but it is extremely difficult to produce true blackness on a screen. The strength of AMOLE is the true black because it has no back light. Each pixels emit light. Darker black = higher contrast. No LCD can ever match the black level of an AMOLED screen.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wouldnt keep saying that lol, htcs IPS SLD 2 can almost match against the blacks of a super amoled and has better colors all around without having to be pentile. unless you were to compare side to side you would be completely happy with the blacks on the one x.
edit: http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/05/htc-one-x-vs-one-s/ compare the blacks, barely a difference unless you were looking hard
i would go with the ips slcd 2 anyday considering no burn, great viewing angles, great battery life especially whites and cloes to as good battery life on blacks, visable outdoors, realistic looking colors/not over saturated, etc. its a balance between good blacks, and good whites. still wouldnt touch the one x though
^^^ above poster have never used an amoled display
slpin said:
^^^ above poster have never used an amoled display
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I most definitely have. from samsungs first amoled screens the behold 2. and both gens of galaxy s.
and i take it you have used the one x? no? since its the only phone with the IPS SLCD "2". not talking about regular SLCD, i have the amaze and the blacks look like crap.
almost every reviewer that has had their hands on nearly every android handset has stated its the best screen they have seen. just my 2 cents.
LCD is growing, OLED is still failing with screen burn.
also, im no htc fanboy (anymore). i really want the lumia 900 actually
Any reviewer says SLCD2 is better or equal to AMOLED has no clue what they are talking about. For the most part, they equal high brightness to better display. Read those reviews carefully. They are probably the same idiots who prefer LCD TVs to Plasma TVs. They made no scientific measurements of the contrast ratio of the screens. So, basically they are simply talking out of their a**.
Yes, LCD has more accurate colors. But it can never have better or equal blacks. There is no way to make LCD panel to block backlight completely.
foxbat121 said:
Any reviewer says SLCD2 is better or equal to AMOLED has no clue what they are talking about. For the most part, they equal high brightness to better display. Read those reviews carefully. They are probably the same idiots who prefer LCD TVs to Plasma TVs. They made no scientific measurements of the contrast ratio of the screens. So, basically they are simply talking out of their a**.
Yes, LCD has more accurate colors. But it can never have better or equal blacks. There is no way to make LCD panel to block backlight completely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess almost every reviewer that has reviewed this phone talks out of their ass, technobuffalo, engadget, phonedog, telegraph? lol, nearly every review that i have read said that. people who love the galaxy s 2, and both aaron from phonedog and john from technobuffalo used the note as their daily and preferred the one x screen.
just because the blacks are one notch off doesnt mean it's not superior. considering it will have better battery life, much more accurate colors, sharper images (when compared to pentile especially), no screen burn (plasma tvs have that horribly, so id stick with my lcd tv). blacks arent the most important color on a phone lol, and i never said they are better or as good. they are pretty damn close though. especially for being a LCD. after seeing screen burn on plasma tvs and oled screen its hard to say id rather have one. people who want a little bit more black screens are okay with screen burn?
and horrible whites?
also, people who dont stay in a cave all day. the ones who go out side, ips is far superior lol considering you have grea viewing angles and its completely viewable outside.
compared to the galaxy nexus the blacks almost looks exactly the same.
i would rather have amoled screen on wp7, but on android i would probably rather have the sld2
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/13/lg-renames-optimus-lte-to-optimus-true-hd-lte-disses-samsungs/
look at this photo: http://i43.tinypic.com/2wn7jfd.jpg
you can barely tell a difference between the menu dots and the bezel. opposed to other lcds. it could be comparable to amoled defintely.
outside photo with low brightness: http://i44.tinypic.com/ipqgzs.jpg
still compeltely visible
overal its all about personal preference, but im sure saying that the new screen is comparable and would even be hard to choose from even over super amoled. i was about to ditch LCD honestly (my amaze has horrible blacks) before seeing this screen. too bad its not in other phones.
Screen quality better be left to those know how to compare, e.g. those who review hdtv for a living. lmao the stuff you quoted above.
Remember, contrast ratio = brigest / darkest. The slight difference in black level significantly changes the contrast ratio. Not so much on brightness.
Yes, there are magic coatings on LCD screens that make them appear dark then actually is. The problem is such coating could cause black crush or false contour. Of course those phone reviewer didn't test those important aspect of PQ of a panel, did they?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
foxbat121 said:
Screen quality better be left to those know how to compare, e.g. those who review hdtv for a living. lmao the stuff you quoted above.
Remember, contrast ratio = brigest / darkest. The slight difference in black level significantly changes the contrast ratio. Not so much on brightness.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really something to even think about. OLED hasnt been seen on a mobile devices over WVGA resolution WITHOUT pentile, we all know pentile sucks. colors, sharpness, etc. we have HD screens with IPS completely sharp, great colors, etc. just my 2 cents
http://i-cdn.phonearena.com/images/articles/48137-image/100-Crop-Red.jpg <- pentile
you dont need to review tvs to know if a mobile screen is good or not. these people have had their hands on nearly every android/wp7/blackberry/wm6 handset. pretty sure they have some say, especially for engadget always hating on every company besides apple then says the one x has the best screen they have seen lol.
both AMOLED/SAMOLED, and IPS SLCD have 16m colors. except the IPS has better viewing angles, no screen bleed, able to see the screen outside, whites to look blue, etc. you dont need to be a reviewer to know which is better.
unless your like everything on your phone to be black, and nothing but black then i dont see the point of saying oled is better just because the blacks are a notch better..
on different OS i would prefer different types of screens. LCD would be crap on wp7 i think unless you used whites a lot. we have yet to see IPS SLCD on wp7 i dont ever think we will. on android though i and other people like having high resolution, good looking colors, etc. cant have that with amoled unless you like pentile. wvga doesnt cut it with android anymore
take a look at the nokia 701, has lcd with clearblack and the blacks look great one it.
FYI, iPhone 4/4s has IPS screen and yet it looks hazey and has the lowest contrast ratio among almost all smartphone screens. IPS maybe better than other LCD screens. But it is still LCD screen. It is physically not possible to completely block the backlite. Otherwise, we don't need local dimming technology on high end LCD TVs anymore.
Hi, i was thinking of buying either a sony smartwatch 3 or a moto 360. Do all of you guys prefer the 3? Tge thing that has stopped me from buying the watch is the ambient screen. Based on your peraonal usage did you find the yellow tinge that noticeable? Do you have any pictures that you can show me just so I know its not going to be an issue for me. Also ive heard that the smartwatch is good for running? Is this true because thats what im looking for. Withthe ambient screen is there anyway to change the diaplay conditions so that that it is less yellow if I root rhe watch? Thanks for the help
yellow screen?
yes, you really should buy the SW3. I did it, and a friend bough the moto360, and he told me that he had a serious lack of battery, slow watch and so on. The SW3 works perfectly, has a great battery and the ambient mode is really good. On my side, i didn't notice any "Yellow-ish white". Definitely the best watch out there.
bBigBrO said:
yes, you really should buy the SW3. I did it, and a friend bough the moto360, and he told me that he had a serious lack of battery, slow watch and so on. The SW3 works perfectly, has a great battery and the ambient mode is really good. On my side, i didn't notice any "Yellow-ish white". Definitely the best watch out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See attached picture....I like the ambient best on the Sony SW3 with a white background and black letters/time/text.
The background in ambient looks like one of those old LCDs and is very easy to read from all angles even in an office with less than perfect light conditions.
When you have a black background with white text it does look slightly yellowish, not bad in my opinion.
nrseife said:
See attached picture....I like the ambient best on the Sony SW3 with a white background and black letters/time/text.
The background in ambient looks like one of those old LCDs and is very easy to read from all angles even in an office with less than perfect light conditions.
When you have a black background with white text it does look slightly yellowish, not bad in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you flip the ambient mode? Typically it's white on black and yours is showing a black on white. Thanks
I created it with Intellicom. You can define the ambient background independently. I also own watchmaker, but unfortunately cannot specify the background for ambient mode there....unless someone tells me how to do that...I contacted the developers but never heard back. Maybe if several SW3 owners raise their voice we get that feature in watchmaker (which otherwise is a great tool).....
Invert it! Getring more white on ambient uses more battery.
Sent from my Sony SmartWatch 3
---------- Post added at 11:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:58 AM ----------
nrseife said:
I created it with Intellicom. You can define the ambient background independently. I also own watchmaker, but unfortunately cannot specify the background for ambient mode there....unless someone tells me how to do that...I contacted the developers but never heard back. Maybe if several SW3 owners raise their voice we get that feature in watchmaker (which otherwise is a great tool).....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I own (and use) WatchMaker too. Invert colors. Simple as that
Sent from my Sony SmartWatch 3
Ah, I will try that. White does NOT use more battery in case of the SW3....transreflective and not OLED display!
nrseife said:
Ah, I will try that. White does NOT use more battery in case of the SW3....transreflective and not OLED display!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I finally noticed the yellow...
It's only noticeable in a particular light one a white screen on a certain angle...
Meh, its worth it for the advantages of the transflective screen...
bBigBrO, where can I set "invert"? I select a watchface, click on "customize", but then I cannot find the option to invert the colors....
nrseife said:
bBigBrO, where can I set "invert"? I select a watchface, click on "customize", but then I cannot find the option to invert the colors....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just add a square shape, enlarge it to fill the screen, move it to the bottom, make it whatever color you want* and set it to display when dimmed only. There's your ambient mode background.
*As MickeZzz has pointed out, although you can set the color to whatever you want, it will probably be displayed as one of four shades of gray (white, light gray, dark gray or black) in ambient mode. But the point remains that you can use a white background in ambient mode.
nrseife said:
Ah, I will try that. White does NOT use more battery in case of the SW3....transreflective and not OLED display!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aren't we talking about two different things here? The transflective screen doesn't require power to be readable in all but the dimmest light; that's true. But it's still not like an e-ink display, which can continue to display an image after power is disconnected. Doesn't every non-black pixel on the screen draw some power, even in ambient mode? Maybe the drain is small enough to be insignificant, but I don't think it's zero.
Please correct me if I'm wrong about this!
No. The Sony one is a transflective LCD. LCD use the least power when displaying white. Black requires LCDs to draw power to change polarity to filter out the backlight...hope that clarifies things.
RobbH said:
Just add a square shape, enlarge it to fill the screen, move it to the bottom, make it whatever color you want and set it to display when dimmed only. There's your ambient mode background.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you add a shape?
EDIT Oh your on about watchmaker not intellicom
Yes, watchmaker....btw, how do you move a square to the bottom (in priority I suppose)? I tried the above and it displays but the text ist not showing....
nrseife said:
Yes, watchmaker....btw, how do you move a square to the bottom (in priority I suppose)? I tried the above and it displays but the text ist not showing....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://m.reddit.com/r/WatchMaker/comments/2ldhuf/support_how_can_i_move_layers_to_change_frontback/
Summary: long press a thumbnail, then press again and drag. The bottom layer at far left.
I made a simple test in watchmaker to show the difference between bright and dimmed screen. I simply added two pictures in watchmaker and put the display mode to always on the pictures that I used.
In dimmed it seems to only display four different gray colors.
It wasn't possible to make screenshot so I simply used the camera, sorry about the bad screenguard on watch.
I really like the screen outdoor!
nrseife said:
No. The Sony one is a transflective LCD. LCD use the least power when displaying white. Black requires LCDs to draw power to change polarity to filter out the backlight...hope that clarifies things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not trying to dispute you, but I am trying to grasp this, especially since finding an earlier thread here, in which it's pointed out that the unpowered state of the display is, in fact, black. That would seem to suggest that black uses less power, but I realize it's not necessarily that simple. Do you know of any references that explain this?
I of course could be wrong with respect to the LCD in the SW3, I am only repeating what I have read about LCD a long time ago....
Best is you try for yourself - I have not noticed any significant difference (clearly not a scientific study) and I like the contrast better when the background is white.
nrseife said:
I of course could be wrong with respect to the LCD in the SW3, I am only repeating what I have read about LCD a long time ago....
Best is you try for yourself - I have not noticed any significant difference (clearly not a scientific study) and I like the contrast better when the background is white.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I've experimented some, too, but haven't noticed a significant difference. Your info may very well be correct, of course.
I have heard from few people that the screen although AMOLED, does not stay true black in dark areas, but have grey tint like LCDs do. How would you people using the device rate the screen and its contrast quality compared to industry standards like Samsung. Also, is the battery drain issue somehow connected to this pixels not turning off completely?
[email protected] said:
I have heard from few people that the screen although AMOLED, does not stay true black in dark areas, but has grey tint like LCDs do. How would you people using the device rate the screen and its contrast quality compared to industry standards like Samsung. Also, is the battery drain issue somehow connected to these pixels not turning off completely?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LED is the same, no matter which brand makes it. there are Three Manufacturers of LED displays, like universal Display Corporation (UDC), SAMSUNG and LG.
But when some Phone brand advertises their display with the name of Super Amoled then it made by Samsung.
and if they say OLED then it made by LG.
and apple usually use display by UDC.
CONCLUSION Realme use Samsung sAMOLED, 94% display market share occupied by Samsung and numbers are keep growing.
[email protected] said:
I have heard from few people that the screen although AMOLED, does not stay true black in dark areas, but have grey tint like LCDs do. How would you people using the device rate the screen and its contrast quality compared to industry standards like Samsung. Also, is the battery drain issue somehow connected to this pixels not turning off completely?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The amoled panel itself is same as samsung as its super amoled and manufactured by samsung.
But the problem is color os dark mode not panel.
Cos applies different shades of black in system wide dark mode, so it may appear grayish but its true black if you are watching movies, using apps with dark mode and on dark wallpapers.
And for me, there is no unusual battery drain.
Standby drain is 0.5-0.8%/hour which is really good.
It last 6 hours of gaming and on moderate usage i have got around 10 hours of sot.
But as we know enabling dark mode saves some amount of battery .But in case of color is dark mode as it is not total dark ,does is save too???
osamanazim said:
But as we know enabling dark mode saves some amount of battery .But in case of color is dark mode as it is not total dark ,does is save too???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tbh, none of dark mode saves significant battery, its not even proofed properly, its just commonly considered, even if it saves, it won't make much difference.
Personally tested, maybe it can add few more mins but can't make difference of a hour in sot.