Related
Hi,
Any suggestion for a best Kernel for the stock rom on WFS?
Any kernel that would provide me good performance and battery life while on data
Thank you!
neilcezar said:
Hi,
Any suggestion for a best Kernel for the stock rom on WFS?
Any kernel that would provide me good performance and battery life while on data
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for best battery consumption stock kernel is best i guess.
but if you want overclocking kernel,ext4 support cake v1.4 is best for u.
crossfire77 said:
for best battery consumption stock kernel is best i guess.
but if you want overclocking kernel,ext4 support cake v1.4 is best for u.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would just like to verify, if I use a kernel that supports ext4 eventhough I am on a stock rom would it work? I am sorry I came from the Note and I found it more challenging to MOD this phone.
Thank you
neilcezar said:
I would just like to verify, if I use a kernel that supports ext4 eventhough I am on a stock rom would it work? I am sorry I came from the Note and I found it more challenging to MOD this phone.
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah ofcourse.filesystem works by kernel so if your kernel supports ext4 then your rom will supports ext4.so you can use internal memory tweaks which needed ext4 file system:good:
Hi
I have a question for what I did not find a straightforward answer;
Some back story: I have an Xperia Arc S with stock .587 rom, I wanted to unlock it so I payed on a site to unlock it with point test {if this is the correct way to say it}, the simlock was removed 'yaay' and they also unlocked the bootloader. so a few days back I wanted to play around with kernels and roms, tried lupus with xperia hd 3.0.2, I didn't like it, don't ask why, and I wanted to return to stock, I messed up, soft bricked the phone...long story short, today I resolved the problem and I managed to install the stock rom again.
TL;DR; Can you use the Arc S stock rom with Lupus v10 kernel ? and does anybody have any experience with it ? worth ?
Thank you
If you have any other kernel suggestion that would come in handy too :fingers-crossed:
Greetings from Hungary.
Sv: [Q] lupus v10 with stock 587 rom
kenderlovag said:
TL;DR; Can you use the Arc S stock rom with Lupus v10 kernel ? and does anybody have any experience with it ? worth ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As an old Arc S user, I'll tell from my own experiences..
Using Lupus or any custom made kernels that are made with the purpose to give you overclock options and alternative CPU Governors on stock & non-rooted ROM.. It isn't worth it, because you will not see any difference in performance.
Tweak and debloat .587 ROM in case you are going to use Lupus kernel, I am saying.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Destroyedbeauty said:
As an old Arc S user, I'll tell from my own experiences..
Using Lupus or any custom made kernels that are made with the purpose to give you overclock options and alternative CPU Governors on stock & non-rooted ROM.. It isn't worth it, because you will not see any difference in performance.
Tweak and debloat .587 ROM in case you are going to use Lupus kernel, I am saying.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sound interesting, I mean I don't really care about performance, that much, the only thing that I noticed with Lupus kernel {or I guess whatever kernel} is the battery life increase.
I'm still thinking and searching the forum to find a good answer, I have no problem with the stock kernel + rom, but if a custom kernel would give the same performance + better battery life that would definitely help
ps I have no idea how to tweak and debloat[ i don't even know what that is] :silly:
Sv: [Q] lupus v10 with stock 587 rom
kenderlovag said:
Sound interesting, I mean I don't really care about performance, that much, the only thing that I noticed with Lupus kernel {or I guess whatever kernel} is the battery life increase.
I'm still thinking and searching the forum to find a good answer, I have no problem with the stock kernel + rom, but if a custom kernel would give the same performance + better battery life that would definitely help
ps I have no idea how to tweak and debloat[ i don't even know what that is] :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, battery life can increase if you are using the right CPU governor and I/O Schelduer (spelling?).
But the increase in your prefered option (BATTERY LIFE) isn't that big on an extended functionality custom kernel, I think, on stock & bloatwared ROM. It can be even worse.. Some battery tweaks in build.prop and some init.d power saving tweaks / scripts can help perhaps.
Best is to try it yourself! Be aware of partial wakelocks, Sony got some bad behaviour with applications that wakes up your Arc S..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Try CM9
Sent from my GT-I9082 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try [ROM][ICS][4.0.4][IMM76L] CyanogenMod 9 Final Release (EOL) by Arco68
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576874
cm9 has the best battery life
dont expect long battery lifes from custom roms as stock rom.
but if u wanna use a custom rom choese the one that suits you.
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Smack that Thanks button if I helped!
XDAing from a N7105 powered by Illusion ROM.
Sent from a small country called Singapore.
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
for me its cm9 or cm11
For me now the best battery saving ROM + kernel is CM 9 and hurtsky's kernel, it is just awesome, if you need battery then this is the right combination for you
CyanogenMod 9 + Hurtsky's Kernel.
and update Playstore Service 4.1.32
iwjosi said:
cm9 has the best battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone tell me which one of the CM9 Asradu posted kernels is the best for battery life? Thanks in advance!
Just wondering, since Kitkat is optimise for low RAM, does cm9 consume large amount of ram?
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im confused, I still see many reports indicating high battery drain on CM11.
btw, currently using "CM09 (EOL final) + Hurtsky's Kernel REV10" but want to know if I would have better options for extended battery performance.
thanks in advance, regards
Problem with installing khan kernel
LS.xD said:
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Sirvanparaste said:
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still got issues?
I can send you instructions via pm. Just tell me if you need...
Anypne can suggest me good ROM and kernel for battery life?
I dont need features, just battery life..
Thanks before
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Kaka88 said:
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Kaka88 said:
I dont need features, just battery life..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Kaka88 said:
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
pedromms86 said:
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wooow..
Thank you very much!
I will try mokee ROM and Fak Kernel..
Doea the ROM comes with its custom kernel?
I will root my device first before flashin custom ROM and Kernel..
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Loulou-13 said:
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'am using last version, get some random reboots (i think its because of fak kernel and undervolt...) i miss some launcher options like mokee have (i know i can change launcher...) i found the rom a little confusing, the way the settings are in config options, and there are too much thinks i dont use and dont like like (side app bar, pie control...etc) .
The rom is good, its just my PERSONAL taste, i like it clean,iam a big fan of mokee, and stock rom, just go to a custom rom for 4.4.4 and better battery like i like i say, just waiting for official 4.4.4 - the quality of camera we loss in custom rom its a big point for me to go back when its released
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much then
Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means f4ktion kernel yes
Sent from my unknown using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Flatric said:
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will see that ROM then
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Rackell said:
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Kaka88 said:
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Flatric said:
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9190 using Tapatalk 2
Update question
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
sammobile dot com/firmwares
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi guys, first of all let me apologize up front for posting this question without knowing whether it has been answered billion times before. It's my first Samsung phone after having Motorola for a long time and the transition to the new apps and vocabulary is not that straightforward.
I've got an I-9190 running 4.2.2 from a carrier and they still haven't upgraded to 4.4. But when I entered to the website above, there's a 4.4.2 firmware for my country and my device. The upgrade seems rather easy, but I'm not sure whether it will run or not. I would really like to upgrade to 4.4.2 and I'm quite confident I'd be able to do it using Odin, but my question is if that firmware could run on my device. Any tips are welcome.
Thanks!
Hi im using rise Q rom in my A5 2017
And i want to improve my battery life
So i need a kernel
What kernel i can use because ive tried a lot of them and seemed not any kernel is compatible with my rom??
Please help
Stapman said:
Hi im using rise Q rom in my A5 2017
And i want to improve my battery life
So i need a kernel
What kernel i can use because ive tried a lot of them and seemed not any kernel is compatible with my rom??
Please help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If Q rom has its own custom kernels, you may flash another (stock) rom to get other (custom) kernels running.
If you want to keep your current rom and only optimize battery life, I recommend to install BetterBatteryStats app, record an idle dump and post it in the BBS thread (https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/app-2-2-05-oct-v2-4-betterbatterystats.1179809/)
There are some experts helping to analyze and giving advices how to optimize battery life on your device.