Develop Bugs

[KERNEL] HO!NO! Palace...

To avoid mess up in tread i decide to separate kernel from Rom.
This is going to be my Kernel palace
GB Kernel V1 include:
Overclock to max stable 1836 mhz
Under-volt all frequency
New low power level (Saves ~8ma at battery for low fps apps)
Add 5 more frequency table
Use readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed
Add interactive, smartassv2, lagfree governor
Implementation of 2-Phase OnDemand
P930 Gingerbread Kernel V1 (Work on Nitro HD and Bell Optimus LTE)
SU640 Gingerbread Kernel V1
LU6200 Gingerbread Kernel V1
P930 CM9 Kernel V4
Mirror
HO!NO! GitHub

Sweet thank you ! Cant wait for a CM9 hehe
Sent from my LG-P930 using XDA

Thanks for all ur work!
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda premium

Advice
HO!NO! said:
To avoid mess up in tread i decide to separate kernel from Rom.
This is going to be my Kernel palace
GB Kernel V1 include:
Overclock to max stable 1836 mhz
Under-volt all frequency
New low power level (Saves ~8ma at battery for low fps apps)
Add 5 more frequency table
Use readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed
Add interactive, smartassv2, lagfree governor
Implementation of 2-Phase OnDemand
P930 Gingerbread Kernel V1 (Work on Nitro HD and Bell Optimus LTE)
SU640 Gingerbread Kernel V1
LU6200 Gingerbread Kernel V1
P930 CM9 Kernel to come when CM9 will be in RC stage....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sir ,maybe you can improve your kernal for deep searching the cm9 kernal,hoping that would be a good resource for your ref.Meanwhile expecting your new ver Of your home-made kernal. keep up your job！

HO!NO! said:
To avoid mess up in tread i decide to separate kernel from Rom.
This is going to be my Kernel palace
GB Kernel V1 include:
Overclock to max stable 1836 mhz
Under-volt all frequency
New low power level (Saves ~8ma at battery for low fps apps)
Add 5 more frequency table
Use readl_relaxed and writel_relaxed
Add interactive, smartassv2, lagfree governor
Implementation of 2-Phase OnDemand
P930 Gingerbread Kernel V1 (Work on Nitro HD and Bell Optimus LTE)
SU640 Gingerbread Kernel V1
LU6200 Gingerbread Kernel V1
P930 CM9 Kernel to come when CM9 will be in RC stage....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can u change the charging animation of LU6200 when it's power off. The original one is really ugly. Thank you very much.

great job! Thanks very much.

THX 4 UR HARD WORK 4 OUR LU su!
啤酒是必须的~

Can't wait for CM9 kernal! Anyone see an improvement in battery life with the current kernals?

Thank you for all your work in main this phone one of the best out there

HO!NO! said:
To avoid mess up in tread i decide to separate kernel from Rom.
This is going to be my Kernel palace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
restored my phone to original att nitro hd rom, then flashed the corresponding kernel, wiped dalvik cache and rebooted.. now i dont have root access? any way to resolve this issue besides rerooting it.. the kernel shouldnt affect it right?

kumayam said:
restored my phone to original att nitro hd rom, then flashed the corresponding kernel, wiped dalvik cache and rebooted.. now i dont have root access? any way to resolve this issue besides rerooting it.. the kernel shouldnt affect it right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your original nitro rom is maybe not rooted...
And no kernel does not change one thing about root.

HO!NO! said:
Your original nitro rom is maybe not rooted...
And no kernel does not change one thing about root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i rooted the stock att nitro rom with super on click, then i made a backup and thats what ive been using, everytime i flash the corresponding kernel, it says i have no root access
Edit: I just rerooted it using super one click and everything works fine now, thanks for everything

rsalan said:
Can't wait for CM9 kernal! Anyone see an improvement in battery life with the current kernals?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't much better than on Bell Stock ROM the first days... but now after some days with tweaking and battery calibration the best battery life i have had so far!

Cromson said:
Wasn't much better than on Bell Stock ROM the first days... but now after some days with tweaking and battery calibration the best battery life i have had so far!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What sort of tweaks?

rsalan said:
What sort of tweaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heres some tweaks
http://androidforums.com/triumph-al...-performance-tweaks-updated-04-03-2012-a.html
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1560588
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1227269
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1289554

init.d support
Any chance of adding init.d support? I have a set of sick tweaks that really promotes battery life and performance.
However, I can only install part of it (manually).

thomas.raines said:
Any chance of adding init.d support? I have a set of sick tweaks that really promotes battery life and performance.
However, I can only install part of it (manually).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
init.d support is already in my rom, this is why i don't see important to make it native in the first version.
In next release it will be native.

Thank you very much

HO!NO! said:
init.d support is already in my rom, this is why i don't see important to make it native in the first version.
In next release it will be native.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which ROM? I installed Kernelpan1c Nitro HD ROM and my wife is liking it very much (it's her phone). But she wants me to hook it up with my init.d scripts as she knows how much battery life and performance is improved. However, when I tried to add the init.d forlder manually, the phone soft bricked. I guess I should post this in the ROMs thread, but I am using this kernel, and as far as I knew, in order for init.d scripts to work, your kernel has to be compatable.

I love this kernel but I love to use cm9.
I know the developer here wants to wait cm9 to rc stage in order to make the kernel for cm9, I would like to ask if you can change your mind cos cm9 original kernel is so lagging. Pls help!
Sent from my LG-P930 using xda premium

[Q] Kernel for Stock Plus v3.01?

Hello, now I have the rom: Stock Plus v3.01, but I want to know if there are any kernel support this rom that allows me to overclock the phone and add more modifications for performance and the like.

tazlooney89 said:
Hello, now I have the rom: Stock Plus v3.01, but I want to know if there are any kernel support this rom that allows me to overclock the phone and add more modifications for performance and the like.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look for gingertiny kernel, or incredikernel. You can find both here http://www.incredikernel.com/?page_id=10, along with incredicontrol and app for tweaking kernel settings.

thanks for your answer! one last question which of the 2 is more stable gingertiny kernel or incredikernel? Both are installed recovery is true?

tazlooney89 said:
thanks for your answer! one last question which of the 2 is more stable gingertiny kernel or incredikernel? Both are installed recovery is true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only use gingertiny and havent tried incredikernel, but i hear others say there using it all the time. And yes they are flashed thru recovery.

sense 2.1 rom + overclock kernel: which is the best?

Hi, I saw that there are some alternatives but none up to date comparison or advice.
I love having stock rom, but I want to overclock it a bit and to have init.d support and int2ext support.
So, for kernel:
- Dust
- Cake
- Sense_fire
which (and what version) is the most stable/the best?
Rom: should I keep stock rom or install a stock-like rom? As for the kernel... Which is the most stable?
Basically I hope to have a rock-solid-like-stock device with a rom that is stock-like and has init.d support and a kernel that supports oc, ext4 (and maybe swap). Is too much to ask?
Last question: to swap or not to swap, that is the question... I red a lot about swap but there are very different opinions and I'm a bit confused. What do you advise?
Thank you very much!

Alefello said:
Hi, I saw that there are some alternatives but none up to date comparison or advice.
I love having stock rom, but I want to overclock it a bit and to have init.d support and int2ext support.
So, for kernel:
- Dust
- Cake
- Sense_fire
which (and what version) is the most stable/the best?
Rom: should I keep stock rom or install a stock-like rom? As for the kernel... Which is the most stable?
Basically I hope to have a rock-solid-like-stock device with a rom that is stock-like and has init.d support and a kernel that supports oc, ext4 (and maybe swap). Is too much to ask?
Last question: to swap or not to swap, that is the question... I red a lot about swap but there are very different opinions and I'm a bit confused. What do you advise?
Thank you very much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
see you will find stock with init.d from my signature link,check my work..
and i have made kernel with oc and without oc with lots of features and also ext4 and swap support.
feel free to try.

crossfire77 said:
see you will find stock with init.d from my signature link,check my work..
and i have made kernel with oc and without oc with lots of features and also ext4 and swap support.
feel free to try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I already saw that and I'm considering your work. But I ask to you (I think you are using your own kernel and rom) is it rock-solid? What does it have better than other roms or kernels (like dust or cake)?
I know that everyone should try things and there are different opinions and so on... But unfortunatly I have to "tweak" a phone that I can't have in my hands for too much time and too much times to try different roms and kernels, and for a rom-change I should also backup and restore everything, because is the primary phone of a friend. So I'm searching about opinions of users that have tried different things to try to find the better one at the first shot

Alefello said:
Well, I already saw that and I'm considering your work. But I ask to you (I think you are using your own kernel and rom) is it rock-solid? What does it have better than other roms or kernels (like dust or cake)?
I know that everyone should try things and there are different opinions and so on... But unfortunatly I have to "tweak" a phone that I can't have in my hands for too much time and too much times to try different roms and kernels, and for a rom-change I should also backup and restore everything, because is the primary phone of a friend. So I'm searching about opinions of users that have tried different things to try to find the better one at the first shot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh okay..yeah i am using my sense_fire_v1 kernel because i dont like OC.and int2ext4+ with 500 mb ext4 and 500 mb swap and my phone is faster than it was on stock kernel.
dust and cake are good but they are old and also drain toomuch battery so i dont use them instead i made new kernels.
edit : Questions should be in Q & A forum.
as you are asking for opinions it's okay but remove that question sign.

crossfire77 said:
oh okay..yeah i am using my sense_fire_v1 kernel because i dont like OC.and int2ext4+ with 500 mb ext4 and 500 mb swap and my phone is faster than it was on stock kernel.
dust and cake are good but they are old and also drain toomuch battery so i dont use them instead i made new kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I'll try your kernel+rom... But for swap... What about sd card life? And if I want to use it, I should enable it in any way or is automatically enabled if I have the partition on the sd card?
crossfire77 said:
edit : Questions should be in Q & A forum.
as you are asking for opinions it's okay but remove that question sign.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, done :good:

[Q] Overclocking a N7100 with android v4.4.2

Is it possible? can someone link me a kernel if so? ps im using Dr.Ketans custom rom v10

Try Nadia or AGNI

OmarKnows said:
Is it possible? can someone link me a kernel if so? ps im using Dr.Ketans custom rom v10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you want to OC?? I think that you see zero efect. Only battery drain and bigger heating.
Better way is undervolting less heating, better battery life

ROM and kernel for battery life s4 mini

Anypne can suggest me good ROM and kernel for battery life?
I dont need features, just battery life..
Thanks before

Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?

Kaka88 said:
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Kaka88 said:
I dont need features, just battery life..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock

Kaka88 said:
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.

pedromms86 said:
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wooow..
Thank you very much!
I will try mokee ROM and Fak Kernel..
Doea the ROM comes with its custom kernel?
I will root my device first before flashin custom ROM and Kernel..

LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!

Loulou-13 said:
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'am using last version, get some random reboots (i think its because of fak kernel and undervolt...) i miss some launcher options like mokee have (i know i can change launcher...) i found the rom a little confusing, the way the settings are in config options, and there are too much thinks i dont use and dont like like (side app bar, pie control...etc) .
The rom is good, its just my PERSONAL taste, i like it clean,iam a big fan of mokee, and stock rom, just go to a custom rom for 4.4.4 and better battery like i like i say, just waiting for official 4.4.4 - the quality of camera we loss in custom rom its a big point for me to go back when its released

I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere

Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much then

Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means f4ktion kernel yes
Sent from my unknown using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.

Flatric said:
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will see that ROM then

F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479

Rackell said:
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download

Kaka88 said:
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom

Flatric said:
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9190 using Tapatalk 2

Update question
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
sammobile dot com/firmwares
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi guys, first of all let me apologize up front for posting this question without knowing whether it has been answered billion times before. It's my first Samsung phone after having Motorola for a long time and the transition to the new apps and vocabulary is not that straightforward.
I've got an I-9190 running 4.2.2 from a carrier and they still haven't upgraded to 4.4. But when I entered to the website above, there's a 4.4.2 firmware for my country and my device. The upgrade seems rather easy, but I'm not sure whether it will run or not. I would really like to upgrade to 4.4.2 and I'm quite confident I'd be able to do it using Odin, but my question is if that firmware could run on my device. Any tips are welcome.
Thanks!