Panel Info
Some of you already use it or have used it.
It will detect if your pannel is LGD or JDI.
thx to @Cloudyfa on informations, hints, suggestions about it, basically it's only a wrapper for the command he used in his thread.
I thought if I should post it or not, since I've already released the LKF - Little Kernel Flasher, first I thought not to post it..then I thought, people need information in one tool, then they can handle with other tool if needed so i decided to post it.
Q) Does my G2 have to be rooted ?
A) YES
So IF your panel type is jdi you can either flash kernel which is suitable for your panel OR proceed to LKF thread and it will automatically detect the panel, patch the kernel and flash it.
The interface itself is clear, simple. If you've got issues please post them here in a clear form with full and understanding sentence.
thx
Link: Version 1.1
Md5:
c41a110ec94c41d51e478cc6ad8b726b
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changes:
1.1 - 4.June 2014 - Added more accurate information (More or less accurate - depending on user input)
Hi mine is a lgd/lgit what are the differences between the both many thanks.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Works well on latest mahdi. Nice job.
Tapatalk-kal küldve az én LG-D802-el
MRobbo80 said:
Hi mine is a lgd/lgit what are the differences between the both many thanks.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just different types. Jdi is Japanese I think.
Sent from my Vs980 running Xdabbeb's 24a v1.1.1
So having this version lgd I will not worry about patching my kernels, personally I have never had issue with white lines.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
MRobbo80 said:
So having this version lgd I will not worry about patching my kernels, personally I have never had issue with white lines.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel devs are now creating and naming the kernels in a way you will see which one is right for you.
Usually if it's just the kernel name then it's the LGD. If it's in the jdi folder or the name contains jdi then it's for jdi.
also, if you get the lines it means you have to flash the opposite one.
But it's easier this way, just informative.
bender_007 said:
Kernel devs are now creating and naming the kernels in a way you will see which one is right for you.
Usually if it's just the kernel name then it's the LGD. If it's in the jdi folder or the name contains jdi then it's for jdi.
also, if you get the lines it means you have to flash the opposite one.
But it's easier this way, just informative.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really great you making these little tools for people that don't feel comfortable doing/running commands themselves.
Thanks
Sent from my Vs980 running Xdabbeb's 24a v1.1.1
Lawlrus said:
Really great you making these little tools for people that don't feel comfortable doing/running commands themselves.
Thanks
Sent from my Vs980 running Xdabbeb's 24a v1.1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are mostly set of commands but yes I know some people want to do things but are uncomfortable typing and fiddling around. It's better shortening the time, make this little things faster and mostly safer. It's a pleasure whenever the tools help someone , you're welcome.
bender_007 said:
They are mostly set of commands but yes I know some people want to do things but are uncomfortable typing and fiddling around. It's better shortening the time, make this little things faster and mostly safer. It's a pleasure whenever the tools help someone , you're welcome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cuts down on me havin to yell at people for asking the same simple questions over and over lol
Sent from my Vs980 running Xdabbeb's 24a v1.1.1
bender_007 said:
Panel Info
Some of you already use it or have used it.
It will detect if your pannel is LGD or JDI.
Link: DOWNLOAD
md5:
Code:
bce735462bfefe7e858650e5abf17eeb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice work, bud. Btw, I think you should add the info that the app requires running on stock kernel (before using AutoRec or flashing any kind of custom/patched kernel) because I know many pp will try to run it after they have white lines issue and the result may not be correct
Cloudyfa said:
Nice work, bud. Btw, I think you should add the info that the app requires running on stock kernel (before using AutoRec or flashing any kind of custom/patched kernel) because I know many pp will try to run it after they have white lines issue and the result may not be correct
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx for pointing it out again m8, I thought of it, too. I'll make it communicate with people to recorrect the status if needed(lkf too):"do you currently have a white line issue?" if yes then the opposite result is correct, if no then the current result is true
4. June 2014 - Added v1.1 - More accurate informations depending on user input.
I'm vexed.. Yesterday the app said jdi and today lgd. How is that?
New day, new chances to win m8. Joking.
It detects whatever your current kernel is.
If it detects lgd and you say that you've got WHITE lines then it knows that your panel is actually JDI.
If it shows jdi and then it asks you if you see white lines and you say yes, then it knows it's lgd actually.
bender_007 said:
New day, new chances to win m8. Joking.
It detects whatever your current kernel is.
If it detects lgd and you say that you've got WHITE lines then it knows that your panel is actually JDI.
If it shows jdi and then it asks you if you see white lines and you say yes, then it knows it's lgd actually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. That explains a lot.. I thought the Lgd/jdi difference was hardware based..
Filgaliel said:
Thanks. That explains a lot.. I thought the Lgd/jdi different was hardware based.. )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Based on your user input it will make sure to detect the right one. I hope it helps
Does the d800 even come with a Jdi display? I keep getting that I have a jdi display but when I look for a pa rom for jdi displays I don't see a d800
Sent from my AT&T LG G2 using Tapatalk
xxxrichievxxx said:
Does the d800 even come with a Jdi display? I keep getting that I have a jdi display but when I look for a pa rom for jdi displays I don't see a d800
Sent from my AT&T LG G2 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please send me direct link for the kernel. i'll patch it for you so you can try.
bender_007 said:
Please send me direct link for the kernel. i'll patch it for you so you can try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I ran a command via terminal and it says I have a lgd display
Sent from my AT&T LG G2 using Tapatalk
Well. You "have" whichever kernel you flash at the last
If the tool has mistaken then it's because of user input
Hi @bender_007
when you talk about white lines, to what lines do you refer?
I have white lines, vertical when the screen is off, and if I saw the screen in a wide angle and with light over the phone.
also, with the command "grep|dmesg -i panel" it shows LGD panel.
I´m using Omnirom with the stock omnirom kernel.
So, I don´t know with option do I have to chose in your app (white lines yes or not)
thanks!
Related
I know the source code has not yet dropped (or maybe it has and I'm doing it wrong) but supposedly this will work with any AMOLED display. Not sure if it's just an app or if it involves framework mods (I'm sure it will need them on CM/AOKP/AOSP).
czechpunk said:
I know the source code has not yet dropped (or maybe it has and I'm doing it wrong) but supposedly this will work with any AMOLED display. Not sure if it's just an app or if it involves framework mods (I'm sure it will need them on CM/AOKP/AOSP).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.xda-developers.com/andro...tive-display-on-4-3-with-activenotifications/
Closest thing to it atm ^
czechpunk said:
I know the source code has not yet dropped (or maybe it has and I'm doing it wrong) but supposedly this will work with any AMOLED display. Not sure if it's just an app or if it involves framework mods (I'm sure it will need them on CM/AOKP/AOSP).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AMOLED display says it all AMOLED is A Screen type and not the Notification Light. You are confused
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 4
Derp...
blackwing182 said:
AMOLED display says it all AMOLED is A Screen type and not the Notification Light. You are confused
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, I understand that - which is exactly what ActiveDisplay does - manipulates the AMOLED screen to allow for notifications to come through without actually waking the phone.
That 3rd party app kind of works but not like I thought, granted it's in a beta state at the moment. I was reading on another thread that there are a few tweaks needed for framework, etc to get the Motorola app to work without Motoblur, but I'm sure they'll get it to work properly eventually.
All of that being said - I'm going ask that a dev to close this thread, since there seems to be enough discussion about this in the non-device specific forums.
Hi guys! I've been using @olvrick's camera from his thread [APP][SENSE][M7]Camera.apk from newest 2.25 base with GIF support and better quality, but it only works on Android 4.2.2, so I made a little repack for 4.3, nothing special.
[highlight]NOTE 1: Camera from FW 3.18 is the same version like the one from FW 3.17.
NOTE 2: There is no camera in FW 3.22 OTA update.[/highlight]
Download links:
Camera_422_on_43_v2-lite.zip
BUG:
When you click on the thumbnail to review the photo, it shows you last taken one and only details are available.
But when you click back once (just once), you are still in gallery, but this time it has options and you can scroll through photos.
Click back once more and you are back to camera.
Camera_422_on_43_v1-lite.zip
If you messed with camera before this mod/apk:
Camera_422_on_43_v2-full.zip
NOTE: Nothing special about this one, no extra features, just extra files to replace messed up ones.
Camera_422_on_43_v1-full.zip
And if you wanna restore original from 4.3:
Camera_restore_on_43_v2-full.zip
Camera_restore_on_43_v1-full.zip
Changelog:
Code:
[b]
v2
fixed bug-1, made bug-2 :p
media-profiles tweaks
[I]bug-2: clicking on thumbnail takes you to last picture, clicking back takes you to gallery, back again to camera.[/I]
v1
initial release
[I]bug-1: by clicking on thumbnail in cam you can only see last photo[/I]
[/b]
Credits:
@olvrick - for extended camera
@LlabTooFeR - for FW 3.17
Disclaimer:
I will try to help if anything goes wrong, but I take no responsibility and/or obligation.
If I stepped on somebody toes, please warn me and I'll do what it takes to remedy.
donmarkoni said:
Hi guys! I've been using @olvrick's camera from his thread [APP][SENSE][M7]Camera.apk from newest 2.25 base with GIF support and better quality, but it only works on Android 4.2.2, so I made a little repack for 4.3, nothing special.
Download links:
Camera_422_on_43_v1-lite.zip
If you messed with camera before this:
Camera_422_on_43_v1-full.zip
And if you wanna restore original from 4.3:
Camera_restore_on_43_v1-full.zip
Credits:
@olvrick - for extended camera
@LlabTooFeR - for FW 3.17
Disclaimer:
I will try to help if anything goes wrong, but I take no responsibility and/or obligation.
If I stepped on somebody toes, please warn me and I'll do what it takes to remedy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
For Google edition?
boterkaaseneieren said:
For Google edition?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Point me to the ROM you are using and I'll check, but I can't do it until this evening.
Sent from my HTC One
donmarkoni said:
Point me to the ROM you are using and I'll check, but I can't do it until this evening.
Sent from my HTC One
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2356654
That would be AWESOME.
Why is this better than 4.3 camera
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
CasseTrop said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2356654
That would be AWESOME.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just got back from racing track. Downloading ROM, but I need sleep (cause my vacation is over), so expect my reply tomorrow.
EDIT: ROM already DL'ed, so I had to check it out... Flash Camera_422_on_43_v1-lite.zip and you should get another camera. Don't use full version. With lite none of the original files will be removed, so it would be easy to remove this one if it's not working.
Upstreammiami said:
Why is this better than 4.3 camera
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has a few functions more, which I'm used to, but quality is probably the same.
xaenali said:
good work...:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
confirmed working on AHRD 21 no issues. flashed lite tried and it all worked great. flashed full but didnt see any difference
is the full version supposed to have the ISO icon on the main screen and the ability to make the capture button background transparent?
k.s.deviate said:
confirmed working on AHRD 21 no issues. flashed lite tried and it all worked great. flashed full but didnt see any difference
is the full version supposed to have the ISO icon on the main screen and the ability to make the capture button background transparent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Confirmed that the Camera_422_on_43_v1-lite is working well on the ARHD 21.0
Thank you very much donmarkoni.
When I flash this camera, whenever I click on the previous taken picture it links me to opening the picture itself and only has "details" as the options unlike before where you could edit/delete/etc. Any idea how to get it to what it was like before?
donmarkoni said:
Just got back from racing track. Downloading ROM, but I need sleep (cause my vacation is over), so expect my reply tomorrow.
EDIT: ROM already DL'ed, so I had to check it out... Flash Camera_422_on_43_v1-lite.zip and you should get another camera. Don't use full version. With lite none of the original files will be removed, so it would be easy to remove this one if it's not working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, not working. FC.
k.s.deviate said:
confirmed working on AHRD 21 no issues. flashed lite tried and it all worked great. flashed full but didnt see any difference
is the full version supposed to have the ISO icon on the main screen and the ability to make the capture button background transparent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for confirmation! Full doesn't make any difference for you cause you are on close-to-stock (look-like-stock) ROM.
As for the question, answer is no, no extra on-screen options, those would be Viper Cam options you are talking about.
alhuang69 said:
Confirmed that the Camera_422_on_43_v1-lite is working well on the ARHD 21.0
Thank you very much donmarkoni.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for confirmation!
HiddenSanctum said:
When I flash this camera, whenever I click on the previous taken picture it links me to opening the picture itself and only has "details" as the options unlike before where you could edit/delete/etc. Any idea how to get it to what it was like before?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I just noticed it myself. Didn't notice it before, as I don't use it, just take the shots, then later check them through Gallery. Probably broken links between Camera and Gallery, cause of different Android versions.
Solution is to live with it, or flash restore zip from 1st post, until I try to fix it, but I can't promise a fix cause I'm not that skilled (yet)
BTW, what ROM are you using?
CasseTrop said:
Nope, not working. FC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will try something when I get home from work.
Thank you for the quick reply!
Before this mod was created I tried flashing the original camera file for 4.2.2 that this mod is based on...camera itself worked with some minor issues, however I did get a force close whenever I tried to view the pictures I had just taken in gallery.
One thing I noticed was it had more on screen options like ISO etc, it also had the ability to make the capture bottons transparent.
Was that original file Viper Cam? If not I'm just curious if maybe those options broke when the mod was created.
Regardless, I love this mod. Thank you very much!!!!
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
i wish it will work for Google edition rom
second.alititude said:
i wish it will work for Google edition rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it could be hacked into AOSP, I'd flip for joy
k.s.deviate said:
Thank you for the quick reply!
Before this mod was created I tried flashing the original camera file for 4.2.2 that this mod is based on...camera itself worked with some minor issues, however I did get a force close whenever I tried to view the pictures I had just taken in gallery.
One thing I noticed was it had more on screen options like ISO etc, it also had the ability to make the capture buttons transparent.
Was that original file Viper Cam? If not I'm just curious if maybe those options broke when the mod was created.
Regardless, I love this mod. Thank you very much!!!!
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad you like it.
Those options you mention are from Viper Camera. I could ask @Turge, @j to the 4n and @hansbert about using their Cam, if there is interest. Well, I just kinda asked them, mentioning their names here.
second.alititude said:
i wish it will work for Google edition rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try, but I can't promise anything, as I don't use GE ROMs and I'm not a developer, just sharing something that worked for me.
If they would allow the use of it that would be amazing! As long as it is based on the new-er build like this one.
I haven't ever used viper Rom nor have I used the cam from it.. so I'm still confused as to how I was able to have the extra settings.... :-\
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
CasseTrop said:
Nope, not working. FC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try this, but know it could break original camera application: Camera_422_on_GE43_v1-full.zip
EDIT: OP updated
donmarkoni said:
Try this, but know it could break original camera application: Camera_422_on_GE43_v1-full.zip
EDIT: OP updated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is this working with 4.3 GE
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
donmarkoni said:
Try this, but know it could break original camera application: Camera_422_on_GE43_v1-full.zip
EDIT: OP updated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not working on insertcoin ge 4.3
Since i have not seen any threads ralated to this ROM and so i've thought that many would be interested to know that there is another 4.4.2 android build available for our beloved Optimus G.
here is the changelog site li http://www.cyanfox-rom.com/2014/01/01/cyanfox-2-0-2/
And here is the download link: http://cyanfox-rom.com/downloads/?folder=e975/
+the main folder which also contains the gapps: http://cyanfox-rom.com/downloads/
I've just installed CyanFox and I am quite impressed by it's overall smoothness and responsiveness. I pleasantly found out that there are many personalization options including halo.
+working DSP manager and 13mp camera(which should be no surprise)
ioang said:
Since i have not seen any threads ralated to this ROM and so i've thought that many would be interested to know that there is another 4.4.2 android build available for our beloved Optimus G.
here is the changelog site li http://www.cyanfox-rom.com/2014/01/01/cyanfox-2-0-2/
And here is the download link: http://cyanfox-rom.com/downloads/?folder=e975/
+the main folder which also contains the gapps: http://cyanfox-rom.com/downloads/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Being this ROM based in CM I believe that MHL don't work, can someone confirm?
Please share some screenshots and more information about ROM.
Thanks for the info.
There are also 4.4.2 build of Vanir and Commotio for E975.
It would be handy to have one general thread for sharing all the info about new ROMs, since dev boards are rarely updated by developers.
pseudobluz said:
Thanks for the info.
There are also 4.4.2 build of Vanir and Commotio for E975.
It would be handy to have one general thread for sharing all the info about new ROMs, since dev boards are rarely updated by developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. It's nice to see a Somorgasbord for ROMs for E975. Specially KitKat ROMs.
Does this ROM have a OFFICIAL page? Or does this ROM becomes updated regularly?
delete
Emmes said:
delete
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please give me a good reason and i will.
Very stupid question but can I dirty flash this from cm11?
neaznc021 said:
Very stupid question but can I dirty flash this from cm11?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it will work but it's a bad idea.
---------- Post added at 12:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:22 AM ----------
MitoTakatori said:
+1. It's nice to see a Somorgasbord for ROMs for E975. Specially KitKat ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's also a JellyBam kitkat rom for our e975.
http://goo.im/devs/BAM/e975
I have to say, this is an awesome daily drive for me. After 2 days of use, i havent seen any problems. And now i also use cyanfox on my nexus 7.
If you are "waiting" for an official LG update, you should try this out in the meantime. You wont regreat it
Sent from your moms bed!
Are there partitions changes in 4.4, this rom specifically? I'm currently using liquid smooth 4.3 rom, what steps should be taken to install this rom?
Edit:
I have just installed it. There are no partition changes, so no data was lost. GPS works great, whole system feels very snappy.
There is 13mp option in camera, but image is then stretched vertical, on 8mp setting everything is fine. same result with Vsco cam app (also it crashes), with Focal app its ok on 13mp. Also there is no photo sphere. Gonna try some camera apps from nexus devices, see how it goes.
Sent from my LG-E975 using Tapatalk 4
It seams that deep sleep doesn't work, something is keeping my phone awake. How about you guys?
Sent from my LG-E975 using Tapatalk 4
Cayman.n2o said:
It seams that deep sleep doesn't work, something is keeping my phone awake. How about you guys?
Sent from my LG-E975 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have yu checkd nfc s turned off...??
Sent from my LG-E975 powering Stock 4.1.2
Yes, turned off nfc, location, everything...
Anyway, I have just installed Bam rom, and the problem with camera that stretches 13mp image is also present on this rom.
For me this is the best kk rom for e975. Everything runs nice and smooth. No battery drain... will stay on this for a while.
Noticed small "bugs":
- custom led color notifications are not working, it's always yellow-green
- after restart there is navigation bar and have to turn it on/off and then it's ok
Hi, I have a problem with network settings. Phone starts up with LTE/GSM and I have not network with this. If I change to WCDMA preferred with *#*#4636*#*# it is ok. When I restart phone it is again set to LTE/GSM. Any possibilty to change permanently?
giuliaspider said:
Hi, I have a problem with network settings. Phone starts up with LTE/GSM and I have not network with this. If I change to WCDMA preferred with *#*#4636*#*# it is ok. When I restart phone it is again set to LTE/GSM. Any possibilty to change permanently?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is not doing anything this code .. wrong
Cayman.n2o said:
Yes, turned off nfc, location, everything...
Anyway, I have just installed Bam rom, and the problem with camera that stretches 13mp image is also present on this rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It may be stretched when you open the app but when you focus it seems to sort itself out
Sent from my Pimped LG Optimus G running BAM Rom 2.0
someone mentioned bam. it seems they're approaching a stable version now with RC2. anyone using this rom care to share a feedback. thanks
Hey guys...
With the release of CM12+ and derivatives comes a rare issue for Z1c owners that only a few people are experiencing and we're trying to track down it's origin.
We believe that it is tied to the new thermanager.xml which replaced sysmon.cfg when LP came out and also the type of display that your Z1c has. Sony used 2 versions of the display when they produced the Z1 and the Z1c.
We'd like to try and find as many of those who like us experience this black line issue which randomly appears when certain conditions are met (we have yet to discover exactly what they are ) but in combination with battery temp rise so you feel the device getting hot.
Here is a video of the issue in action :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9wyRHnjH3E&feature=youtu.be
Please let us know the display type you have which can be read via ES file explorer
Nick
Black lines:
- JDI, revision 14W09
- JDI, revision 14W04
- JDI, revision 14W15
No black lines:
- AUO, revision 14W26
- JDI, revision 14W32. Replaced screen on AUO - no black lines.
- AOU, revision 14W32
P.S. Check revision of your Z1c by opening sim tray, and look on back side of paper "tongue" .
rtimoff said:
Black lines:
- JDI, revision 14W09
- JDI, revision 14W04
- JDI, revision 14W15
No black lines:
- AUO, revision 14W26
- JDI, revision 14W32. Replaced screen on AUO - no black lines.
- AOU, revision 14W32
P.S. Check revision of your Z1c by opening sim tray, and look on back side of paper "tongue" .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.... thanks Roman.... the revision number is also good additional information please folks (indicates production run... lower number= earlier production date)
mine is JDI, revision 14W12 for the record
I have stripes on CM12+
On stock LP - nothing stripes
Display: JDI/ Date of manufacture my phone - 14W04
AUO, revision 14W46 here. No black lines.
It seems that only screens JDI is a problem(
JDI 14W11 no black lines.
JDI 14W15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jC887JEVcM
Wanted: JDI panel ROM testers
John.D.. said:
It seems that only screens JDI is a problem(
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes... indeed it seems the JDI panel is the culprit.
We need a few of us with the JDI panel and unlocked bootloader to install the FXP AOSP 5.1 Build 150522 (needs fastboot flash) and run it to try and invoke the black line issue.... so whatever you have had running previously on your device when you've experienced the issue needs to be replicated to see if it happens using this ROM (which has the original thermanager.xml.)
EDIT:.... if you run this test and get the issue still happening please can you take a photo of it while on the 'about phone' tab scrolled down to show the Kernel and Build Number info which displays that the device has AOSP 5.1 installed..... then either post here or send to me whichever you like.
Once we get the results of this we have a way forward to get this issue fixed for any ROM use.
iNDEX3 said:
JDI 14W15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jC887JEVcM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah... Hitchhikers guide fan.... ..... early revision JDI is causing a few of us this problem.... but Robin and myself have set out to find a solution and having narrowed it down we need the ROM tested as per my request above.
If your English is not so good then I'm sure one of the other Russians can translate for you...?
cheers
On http://uploaded.net/f/ub0dtu i look last AOSP for amami from 150522. But today 150526.
160lightning said:
yes... indeed it seems the JDI panel is the culprit.
We need a few of us with the JDI panel and unlocked bootloader to install the FXP AOSP 5.1 (needs fastboot flash) and run it to try and invoke the black line issue.... so whatever you have had running previously on your device when you've experienced the issue needs to be replicated to see if it happens using this ROM (which has the original thermanager.xml.)
Once we get the results of this we have a way forward to get this issue fixed for any ROM use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
F***! There still remain the strips! I have just checked..They begin from the loading screen. I installed 150522
John.D.. said:
F***! There still remain the strips! I have just checked..They begin from the loading screen. I installed 150522
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok.... thanks for trying this John.... lets see if others also confirm.... but don't worry, this was not intended to fix but rather to pin down the source. We are organised for a developer who has a good connection direct to Sony to get the appropriate changes made for those of us with the JDI panels once we know absolutely for sure that the issue stems from the original Sony thermanager.xml which is what resides inside this AOSP 5.1 ROM.
iNDEX3 said:
On http://uploaded.net/f/ub0dtu i look last AOSP for amami from 150522. But today 150526.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where is 150526....? I only see 150522.... but it should not matter which one you have
160lightning said:
Where is 150526....? I only see 150522.... but it should not matter which one you have
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I took AOSP_L_MR1_150522_amami.zip it to the bottom of the list of references
So... which version of the test?
John.D.. said:
I took AOSP_L_MR1_150522_amami.zip it to the bottom of the list of references
So... which version of the test?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm fairly certain that any of the builds will be ok to use for this test.... especially as you just tested the latest and still get the black lines. I doubt very much whether thermanager.xml has been changed at all since it was released for amami.
But of course the other ROM devs such as CM may well have made changes.... this is why we need to be sure it originates from the Sony file.... so this test is the logical way to discover the answer.... begin with the source.
160lightning said:
I'm fairly certain that any of the builds will be ok to use for this test.... especially as you just tested the latest and still get the black lines. I doubt very much whether thermanager.xml has been changed at all since it was released for amami.
But of course the other ROM devs such as CM may well have made changes.... this is why we need to be sure it originates from the Sony file.... so this test is the logical way to discover the answer.... begin with the source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I have installed this AOSP_L_MR1_150522_amami.zip version, and the strip is still there)
This latest version, therefore no changes
John.D.. said:
Well, I have installed this AOSP_L_MR1_150522_amami.zip version, and the strip is still there)
This latest version, therefore no changes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
John.... please can you open your 'about phone' tab and scroll down so you can see 'kernel' and 'Build Number' info showing the AOSP as installed and with the black lines over the top and take a photo of this please....?
The more ammunition we have to give Sony the better for us to get our fix... the right people at Sony can then see with their eyes also.....
160lightning said:
John.... please can you open your 'about phone' tab and scroll down so you can see 'kernel' and 'Build Number' info showing the AOSP as installed and with the black lines over the top and take a photo of this please....?
The more ammunition we have to give Sony the better for us to get our fix... the right people at Sony can then see with their eyes also.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sh*t, I have returned to stock
I can ask somebody from the Russian-speaking community, to make it
John.D.. said:
Sh*t, I have returned to stock
I can ask somebody from the Russian-speaking community, to make it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apologies.... I thought you probably would have returned to your original ROM after the test.... Ideally I should have thought to ask for the photo with original request.... not to worry.... if you can find anyone else this would be a bonus
thanks
Hi,
Any developers around here working on custom kernels already?
It would be nice if @flar2 and @Freak07 would work on our Pixel 6 Pro!
Kernel source code is available from Google: https://android.googlesource.com/device/google/raviole-kernel/
Let the games begin!
I have some stuff started, just wrapping my head around the GKI and modules
@DespairFactor, sweet! I'm mostly interested in using color control with the ElementalX app first.
Ghisy said:
@DespairFactor, sweet! I'm mostly interested in using color control with the ElementalX app first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True words have never been spoken. The hue white point of this device is this weird yellowish tint. KCAL is an absolute must to get the screen to look nice and coolish blue tint like other devices.
Burt Squirtz said:
The hue white point of this device is this weird yellowish tint.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it? Ugh, I haven't really used the device yet. I like my screens with a coolish blue tint too.
Most of the developers probably cant get a pixel 6 currently haha
I'd lend one mines. 7T is operating perfectly and I can't port my number for another ENTIRE MONTH
Burt Squirtz said:
True words have never been spoken. The hue white point of this device is this weird yellowish tint. KCAL is an absolute must to get the screen to look nice and coolish blue tint like other devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes - 100%!!!!!!!!! I have very specific red / green / blue settings that I have to have!!
flar2 has set up a pixel 6 repo so looks like he working on it
DespairFactor said:
I have some stuff started, just wrapping my head around the GKI and modules
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Tad bit different. Would like to figure out how to decompile the modules. For curiosity sake... . Been awhile since I compiled anything.
gokart2 said:
Same here. Tad bit different. Would like to figure out how to decompile the modules. For curiosity sake... . Been awhile since I compiled anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't see any reason why you'd do this, the source is readily available
Nekromantik said:
flar2 has set up a pixel 6 repo so looks like he working on it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice can u show me the repos?
ZeNiXxX said:
Nice can u show me the repos?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's empty.
DespairFactor said:
I have some stuff started, just wrapping my head around the GKI and modules
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice.
Not tired you're kernel before. Will give it a go
DespairFactor said:
don't see any reason why you'd do this, the source is readily available
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the modules source wasn't available.... Again it's been awhile and it's slightly different than before. Just sync'd the repo at this point, so I haven't really looked hard yet.
gokart2 said:
I thought the modules source wasn't available.... Again it's been awhile and it's slightly different than before. Just sync'd the repo at this point, so I haven't really looked hard yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go
kernel/google-modules/ - Git at Google
@DespairFactor
I meant these .ko files. Thought these were the vendor specific modules that get loaded separately from the GKI? Honestly I haven't a clue. I at least got it compiling, so its a start. I do this as a challenge/to keep myself busy. Learn as I go.
refs/heads/android12-d1-s5-release - device/google/raviole-kernel - Git at Google
gokart2 said:
@DespairFactor
I meant these .ko files. Thought these were the vendor specific modules that get loaded separately from the GKI? Honestly I haven't a clue. I at least got it compiling, so its a start. I do this as a challenge/to keep myself busy. Learn as I go.
refs/heads/android12-d1-s5-release - device/google/raviole-kernel - Git at Google
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some are in the kernel source too
@DespairFactor
Have you compiled yet? What's the difference between the vendor_boot.img and the boot.img that gets outputted? The checksums are different, but the filesize is the same? Haven't unpacked them to see if I can tell the difference yet.
gokart2 said:
@DespairFactor
Have you compiled yet? What's the difference between the vendor_boot.img and the boot.img that gets outputted? The checksums are different, but the filesize is the same? Haven't unpacked them to see if I can tell the difference yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe this is the vendor modules. Did you compile manually or using google's script? Feel free to reach out to me directly on telegram. I have a link in my sig that opens a chat with me.