Develop Bugs

Best kernel xperia S CM10?Battery life...

Hi guys,
i know that this question been asked already but being not so smart would like to ask first before doing anything..
Running CM10 FX210 on xperia s at the moment everything seems fine pretty much it's just battery seems similar to official ISC ..main reason for using custom rom was to improve battery..now I've been reading that there's few other kernels you can flash in recovery with better battery life..problem is which one i dare to use..some people getting stuck on bootloops after flashing ...also people suggesting that should stay away from custom roms such as CM because they use more of battery since they preform really good..maybe I shold try any stock rom?Any suggestions?
appreciate any response on this silly questions...
p.s. so my point just need rom or kernel for cm10 with good battery life...no need for playing games or to be superfast etc...:silly:

The only custom kernel for CM10 I think is Nova... It should be better than stock but... The best is relative. At the first 4 versions of KA kernel, for example, most people loved it, phone was way better, but mine never liked it... So it wasn't the best FOR ME.

thanks for reply mate..
I'm trying to download latest which is NovaKernel-nozomi-1.6.zip but it doesn't want to start download..any mirror link for this?
Should i go for latest or read somewhere that 007 version is the best battery friendly but seems way to old to 1.6?

one more question..
How to install stock rom over CM10 in my case? Do I have to use flash tool as well just put zip on phone and flash it?
thank you...

[email protected] said:
thanks for reply mate..
I'm trying to download latest which is NovaKernel-nozomi-1.6.zip but it doesn't want to start download..any mirror link for this?
Should i go for latest or read somewhere that 007 version is the best battery friendly but seems way to old to 1.6?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go ahead with nova 1.6, it was giving me great battery life on aokp ROM.

Using the stock CM10 kernel. Battery life is much better than stock ROM / Kernel.
I use WiFi only when needed, 3G is off and brightness is 50%. Don't use much CPU except for a handful of widgets.
Will try Nova too.

I would recommend you the Nova Kernel
Switch your governour to "intellidemand".
I got appx 3 days with 4-5 hours screen time, by using 2G when screen is off and flight moder over night for 6 hours.

I can recommend Nova and KA as any othes of you, too =)

So Nova is the best .

best rom cm9 / cm10 / cm11? battery friendly?

Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance

Try CM9
Sent from my GT-I9082 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try [ROM][ICS][4.0.4][IMM76L] CyanogenMod 9 Final Release (EOL) by Arco68
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576874

cm9 has the best battery life

dont expect long battery lifes from custom roms as stock rom.
but if u wanna use a custom rom choese the one that suits you.

kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Smack that Thanks button if I helped!
XDAing from a N7105 powered by Illusion ROM.
Sent from a small country called Singapore.
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA

for me its cm9 or cm11

For me now the best battery saving ROM + kernel is CM 9 and hurtsky's kernel, it is just awesome, if you need battery then this is the right combination for you

CyanogenMod 9 + Hurtsky's Kernel.
and update Playstore Service 4.1.32

iwjosi said:
cm9 has the best battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone tell me which one of the CM9 Asradu posted kernels is the best for battery life? Thanks in advance!

Just wondering, since Kitkat is optimise for low RAM, does cm9 consume large amount of ram?

Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good

Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im confused, I still see many reports indicating high battery drain on CM11.
btw, currently using "CM09 (EOL final) + Hurtsky's Kernel REV10" but want to know if I would have better options for extended battery performance.
thanks in advance, regards

Problem with installing khan kernel
LS.xD said:
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,

Sirvanparaste said:
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still got issues?
I can send you instructions via pm. Just tell me if you need...

best rom galaxy ace 2 i8160

rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2604459

zizoumadrid said:
rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u will install for ex. cm11 u will be forced to use cm11 kernel aswell, so changing kernel to stock on any custom 4.2+ is impossibru i think

i need best rom about battery life thank's

I install many ROM's and stopped at AOSP
Android Open Source Project (AOSP) [4.4.2]
Beatiful ROM. Very clean & smooth.

Resurrection Remix: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2688432
is smooth sailing, with max CPU freq. of 600MHz, and abyssplug governor, as well as deepest sleep state 5, you should get very good battery life. With moderate use (no games, just 2D apps and music), mine lasts 22 hours.

Cyanogenmod 10.2
I'm using Cyanogenmod 10.2 works very well. Only thing is some videos wont play with the default player but play fine with MXPlayer. Not sure why videos wont play or wont show in thumbnail in gallery, otherwise fine. Thinking of getting CM11.

zizoumadrid said:
rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi im new here i been coming to this site for a few weeks now i just got signed up and cant post in the dev section of ace 2 yet so i need to get my posts up the best rom i have used is cm11 by maclaw its light has good ram usage and good battery life i know this thead is proberly quit old but as i say i need to get my posts up and dont wanna post useless replys :good:

I like 10.2 by tc. Tried out cm11 by tc didn't like it. Didn't like the dialer you can't change lock screen wallpaper I wasn't getting caller images in notifications and it felt slower. Gone back to CM10.2. Probably try again when they've finished it.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk

For my cm11 is the best rom as the performance is well and there aren't bug

zizoumadrid said:
rom jb 4.1.2 stock installed
which is the best rom for galaxy ace 2 i8160 battery life/performance/stable
and i have one question when install costum rom has been get custom kernel or just keep with stock kernel
thank's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try zwiliew's kernel.
it has good governors

Is CM 11 working well? i'm on CM 10.2 and in my opinion runs great, but sometimes has problems with memory management.

The 2 best roms are CM10.1 (2013-12-13) and Omni rom 4.4
Both are fast, smooth and stable. Omni has the best battery like since it has less features. CM10.1 has a Low in call bug soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo =p
If you're and Instagram user and you upload videos omni and other 4.4 roms won't do but CM10.1 will do

ROM and kernel for battery life s4 mini

Anypne can suggest me good ROM and kernel for battery life?
I dont need features, just battery life..
Thanks before

Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?

Kaka88 said:
Really?
I planned to flash slimkat ROM..
What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Kaka88 said:
I dont need features, just battery life..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock

Kaka88 said:
Because i think some of custom ROM has bettwr battery life than stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.

pedromms86 said:
if you debloated and make knox-free, stock rom will have good battery life, better camera, and samsung framework features (things you lost in custom rom)
if you want to try a custom rom, i recommend you try Mokee (stable) with last Fak Kernel, mokee has an amazing saving power feature and is the more stable rom (in my opinion), with fak kernel with right settings and undervolt (see in fak thread, or pm me) you will get the best battery life, my goals are the same as yours (battery life), and i already try almost every rom here (right now iam trying LiquidSmooth, but i did not like it...will try next the S5 proyect, and wait for official 4.4.4 to test, but until now, mokee is my prefered rom
Dont know if last fak kernel is working with mokee, when a try it some time ago it give me FC, but i think last version works, cause iam using it with liquismooth right now, but even with the stock mokee kernel, it has amazing battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wooow..
Thank you very much!
I will try mokee ROM and Fak Kernel..
Doea the ROM comes with its custom kernel?
I will root my device first before flashin custom ROM and Kernel..

LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!

Loulou-13 said:
LiquidSmooth ???
last v3.2 milestone , it's a full stable rom ...... and with a very good baterry life !
why you don't like it ?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'am using last version, get some random reboots (i think its because of fak kernel and undervolt...) i miss some launcher options like mokee have (i know i can change launcher...) i found the rom a little confusing, the way the settings are in config options, and there are too much thinks i dont use and dont like like (side app bar, pie control...etc) .
The rom is good, its just my PERSONAL taste, i like it clean,iam a big fan of mokee, and stock rom, just go to a custom rom for 4.4.4 and better battery like i like i say, just waiting for official 4.4.4 - the quality of camera we loss in custom rom its a big point for me to go back when its released

I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere

Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
http://www.sammobile.com/firmwares/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Why you want to flash any other custom ROM if you don't need any features, only a good battery?
I really don't understand this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
What did I tell you in my first replies? :angel:
Here is F4k kernel for stock: [KERNEL]-[TW]-[ML1] f4ktion 1.3.0 [LTE] - [OC/UC/UV/OTG]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much then

Kaka88 said:
I will stick with stock ROM first with custom kernel..
Do you mean f4ction kernel?
Because i cant fink fak kernel everywhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means f4ktion kernel yes
Sent from my unknown using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.

Flatric said:
I'm using the Spirit Rom and battery life is without f4ction kernel very good it's better than with f4k kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will see that ROM then

F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479

Rackell said:
F4k kernel for aosp roms:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2568479
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download

Kaka88 said:
Thanks!
But i accidentally brick my device and i have downloaded SLIM Rom, so i flashed it..
And i cant find AOSP ver in your link..
I want to use fak kernel with Slim Rom..
Stock ROM just too big to download
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom

Flatric said:
You have to download f4k kernel for aosp Roms to use it with Slim Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9190 using Tapatalk 2

Update question
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
Stock.
sammobile dot com/firmwares
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi guys, first of all let me apologize up front for posting this question without knowing whether it has been answered billion times before. It's my first Samsung phone after having Motorola for a long time and the transition to the new apps and vocabulary is not that straightforward.
I've got an I-9190 running 4.2.2 from a carrier and they still haven't upgraded to 4.4. But when I entered to the website above, there's a 4.4.2 firmware for my country and my device. The upgrade seems rather easy, but I'm not sure whether it will run or not. I would really like to upgrade to 4.4.2 and I'm quite confident I'd be able to do it using Odin, but my question is if that firmware could run on my device. Any tips are welcome.
Thanks!

[Q] Recommendation for the most stable S4 Mini ROM

Hello,
My GF's S4 Mini is 2 years old, not a single hard reset, with unrooted stock ROM.
She is happy with performance and with phone in general but battery is bust, it barely holds for 10 hours with light to medium use.
She uses her phone for WhatsApp, Messenger and occasionally taking some photos.
I am not sure though which version does she have. I can find out that later today but meanwhile I would be grateful for your advice.
It doesn't have to be the newest ROM version, it has to be reliable, with good battery and preferably with stock camera app.
Thank you!

There is no perfect rom. Keep the rom she is using. Change the battery , after 2 years is busted as u said
It could also be old problem that battery was draining fast even with 3g/wifi/gps OFF. That`s a motherboard problem that can be fixed by changing motherboard or with a custom kernel that have the fix implemented. Stupid thing is, after u install a custom kernel, u need to root phone and disable Knox apps or they will bother u. Search what version of S4 mini she have, what rom she have and start from there to search. I have for example some kernels with fixes for that problem, but first read on forums.

The above being said and valid...
... I find that this ROM: Resurrection-Remix-LP-v5.5.8-20151026-serranodsdd
works pretty well for me. It is stable enough. You would have to root and stuff but its worth a try.

H10N3 said:
The above being said and valid...
... I find that this ROM: Resurrection-Remix-LP-v5.5.8-20151026-serranodsdd
works pretty well for me. It is stable enough. You would have to root and stuff but its worth a try.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. RR LP 5.5.8 is very stable and battery friendly and also Blisspop 4.0.3 last two versions are good enough. BUT, in these 2 fantastic roms i have found a major bug (at least for me) that during incoming calls most of the times my contacts dont show up their names (only numbers) or sometimes very lately. I asked the devs about the problem but did not get any reply. So m back now to PAC rom KK 4.4.4, i used it for around 4 months continuously before i tried lollipop roms. Stable, good battery(05/01/2015 version) and hell lot of features.
N.B: The above is based on my experience only. It may very from person to person. And also it does not imply that other roms are worse or better, because i have not tried all of them.

What I have observed is temperature and the kernel have big impacts on battery drain. Stock 4.4. drains the battery much slower than 4.2., and the Cyanogenmod kernels also use up less juice than the stock roms.

the same
I have same issue. 2 or more years i9195 with stock 4.4.2 android. Battery drain is about 1%/hour at idle (sleep). When using it raises to 2-5%/hour. I want any other ROM or kernel that drains less battery. Please help

My phone has almost two years. Battery remains excellent. No tricks, such as calibration, etc.
In my experience the best ROM Stock based is this http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...t/gt-i9192-galaxy-s4-mini-duos-4-4-2-t2832673 .
I never installed another kernel, etc. in its use. I tried several ROMS CM based but always came back to this rom for stability, reliability, battery.
But lately I have been interested in Android M.
And I was already giving up again when I decided to use CM13 (feb / 21) by K2wl without GAPPS (Open GAPPS) or Custom Kernel.
My intention is to test CM13 in its purest possible code.
So far it has been amazing. No call issues, great battery (as in SilviuMik ROM). etc
I'm curious. Will this time be able to use a ROM CM based for more than two weeks without problems with Call and battery? If this happens it will be worth testing other GAPPS.

for ADR USR
ADR USR said:
My phone has almost two years. Battery remains excellent. No tricks, such as calibration, etc.
In my experience the best ROM Stock based is this http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...t/gt-i9192-galaxy-s4-mini-duos-4-4-2-t2832673 .
I never installed another kernel, etc. in its use. I tried several ROMS CM based but always came back to this rom for stability, reliability, battery.
But lately I have been interested in Android M.
And I was already giving up again when I decided to use CM13 (feb / 21) by K2wl without GAPPS (Open GAPPS) or Custom Kernel.
My intention is to test CM13 in its purest possible code.
So far it has been amazing. No call issues, great battery (as in SilviuMik ROM). etc
I'm curious. Will this time be able to use a ROM CM based for more than two weeks without problems with Call and battery? If this happens it will be worth testing other GAPPS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ADR USR, your suggested ROM Stock is for i9192. Will it work with i9195?

vaidasbar said:
ADR USR, your suggested ROM Stock is for i9192. Will it work with i9195?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not think so. But this is not a problem. Just try the kernel to 95:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2592308
I believe that all you need. I never got to use debloated version of this ROM. I'd rather do it manually.

ADR USR said:
I do not think so. But this is not a problem. Just try the kernel to 95:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2592308
I believe that all you need. I never got to use debloated version of this ROM. I'd rather do it manually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you i have never changed kernel. Where can i find a reliable tutorial ?

vaidasbar said:
Thank you i have never changed kernel. Where can i find a reliable tutorial ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2592308
read with attention.
More?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2590976

I have installed I9195-LTE-Custom-Kernel-Silviu-v4-Odin.tar.rar
I will tell if it solve battery drain.
Thanks

switzerland92 said:
Hello,
My GF's S4 Mini is 2 years old, not a single hard reset, with unrooted stock ROM.
She is happy with performance and with phone in general but battery is bust, it barely holds for 10 hours with light to medium use.
She uses her phone for WhatsApp, Messenger and occasionally taking some photos.
I am not sure though which version does she have. I can find out that later today but meanwhile I would be grateful for your advice.
It doesn't have to be the newest ROM version, it has to be reliable, with good battery and preferably with stock camera app.
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used the official CM12.1 nightlies (& kernal) for about a year on my I9195, in the first few months I did get almost weekly random restarts, as you might expect on a nightly, but towards year end almost none. Then I installed the last Snapshot YOG9 (or whatever) and didn't get a single reboot in months.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...i9190-i9195-cyanogenmod-12-1-s4-mini-t3100159
Currently I'm on an unofficial version of same CM12.1 that has latest monthly security updates patched (which will be built until a stable release of CM13 is out) as the official CM12.1 development has stopped due to CM13. I've not had a single crash or reboot on this CM12.1 ROM, so that's about 6mths with no problems all together.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...i9190-i9195-cyanogenmod-12-1-nightly-t3300836
My wife is on CM12.1 (NightOwl) too on her old Note N7000, she has not had a single problem in the 2mths since I installed it. So long story short I'd say almost any version of CM12.1 is now very stable (provided you clear caches etc when installing and don't load dodgy apps )

CM13 version not suggested yet?
The best choice is the updated CM12.1?

wmiki75 said:
CM13 version not suggested yet?
The best choice is the updated CM12.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using cm13 nightlies ever since it came out. Almost updated every new package. Since then i had to revert it twice. For me so far it's stable. Using it with gapps pico. But do nog use any extended cm13 roms like bliss or rr, as they are highly unstable, lagy and full of buggs.

Have a nice day to all. I have an i9192 (GT-I9192ZKAAFR, S4 mini DUOS) with the latest original I9192XXUBNB1 ROM and the CSC is I9192OJVBNB1 (AFR / Kenya / AE). I have to use this phone again and it is horrible. Often becomes hot and unresponsive. Sometimes just simply shutdown itself or reboot. That is why I moved to another phone but that is in service now. Otherwise this is an amazing little device. I decided that it is time to take steps towards to a more stable ROM. Phone has Knox and it is still 0x0. Manufactured in 2013 and bought in 2014 so support has definitely gone. Therefore I am not really keen on Knox status but would be great to keep 0x0.
I am a Hungarian user and I would like to use Hungarian language on the phone. I see some ROM recommendation here. Is that true for Hungarian language as well? What about different region, modem or so? Are these ROMs working on my device? Is it possible to revert my phone to any factory version? I am not familiar with flashing ROM on this phone but read some tutorials and more or less trained.

Hi,
I'm on Exodus (+ Gapps pico) & very happy by the quality of this rom. (I haven't tried many other roms though)