I am currently running CM10.2 and I tried flashing a lightning kernel and it resulted in a bootloop.
Does anyone know which kernels do work with 10.2?
I need to flash one because there's serious battery drain.
Thanks guys.
ktimque said:
I am currently running CM10.2 and I tried flashing a lightning kernel and it resulted in a bootloop.
Does anyone know which kernels do work with 10.2?
I need to flash one because there's serious battery drain.
Thanks guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To answer your question, Lightning zap kernel is only for 4.2.2 ROMs only. There's blasphemy kernel but, there's issues with it on the latest CM10.2 nightlies.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
Related
Can you just mix and match a kernel with a custom ROM? Or how do I know if they are compatible, without nandroid+trial+error.
I was using stock/rooted jellybean ROM + franco kernel. I just flashed AOKP which includes it's own kernel (tuna-faux), but want to go back to franco.
Thanks for the help. I did try searching but did not find this information.
as long as the kernel supports the android version (4.0.4 or 4.1.1, etc) of the rom you are on, you're fine.
Zepius said:
as long as the kernel supports the android version (4.0.4 or 4.1.1, etc) of the rom you are on, you're fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And are they backwards compatible? Can I use a 4.1.1 kernel with a 4.0.4 ROM?
Thanks for the reply!
wcleveland said:
And are they backwards compatible? Can I use a 4.1.1 kernel with a 4.0.4 ROM?
Thanks for the reply!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you can't. Stay on the same version.
wcleveland said:
Can you just mix and match a kernel with a custom ROM? Or how do I know if they are compatible, without nandroid+trial+error.
I was using stock/rooted jellybean ROM + franco kernel. I just flashed AOKP which includes it's own kernel (tuna-faux), but want to go back to franco.
Thanks for the help. I did try searching but did not find this information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trial and error I'm afraid. I had AOKP and flashed Franco on top and it broke a couple minor things, like Settings - Storage would FC every time with this combination. So I assumed there is a reason AOKP came with tuna-faux, it was tested on it and made for it.
aokp and cyanogen come with a kernel for their code, i think you can't flash other kernel
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Hey i just rooted my HTC ONE X and installed cyanogenmod 10.1 nightlies (4.2.2). I have noticed that my battery drains like hell now after installing that rom!! Its getting over very quickly. I heard that installing a new kernel might extend your battery life.
Is franco kernel safe? How to flash it? just help me extend my battery life... I usually dont play that much games only sometimes while going to bed or when i m free!!
Pls help!!
Flashing Kernel
alcatus1708 said:
Hey i just rooted my HTC ONE X and installed cyanogenmod 10.1 nightlies (4.2.2). I have noticed that my battery drains like hell now after installing that rom!! Its getting over very quickly. I heard that installing a new kernel might extend your battery life.
Is franco kernel safe? How to flash it? just help me extend my battery life... I usually dont play that much games only sometimes while going to bed or when i m free!!
Pls help!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This question is asked many times. Yes flashing a new kernel would help.
I advice you to flash NCX kernel.
You can read more about this or other kernels available for AOSP Roms in the Original Development thread.
EDIT: In my own experience, Sense roms have better battery life in comparison to AOSP roms. But AOSP roms come with lots of goodies! Easier life!
Stable xm is also good. I guess 188(v4)
You can not flash franco, since it is based on ICS source.
So will the NCX kernel work on CyanogenMod 10.1?? Will it help improving the battery life?
Sent from my HTC One X running CyanogenMod 10.1 (4.2.2)
alcatus1708 said:
So will the NCX kernel work on CyanogenMod 10.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If he has a aosp version of his kernel .... yes
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Try CM9
Sent from my GT-I9082 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can try [ROM][ICS][4.0.4][IMM76L] CyanogenMod 9 Final Release (EOL) by Arco68
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576874
cm9 has the best battery life
dont expect long battery lifes from custom roms as stock rom.
but if u wanna use a custom rom choese the one that suits you.
kap19 said:
Hi guys
I have this galaxy w which I had the stock rom with gingerbread.
I was searching for a custom rom for the phone and saw that there were cm9 cm10 and cm11.
I installed the new cm11 by arco68 but I'm having problems with the battery with greenify already installed.
During the night when I was asleep in 3 hours used 10% of my battery.
I'm new in roms and android development, so can anyone help me and tell me the differences between each cm version?
Any version is more lighter with the battery?
What can I do improve the battery use?
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Smack that Thanks button if I helped!
XDAing from a N7105 powered by Illusion ROM.
Sent from a small country called Singapore.
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
for me its cm9 or cm11
For me now the best battery saving ROM + kernel is CM 9 and hurtsky's kernel, it is just awesome, if you need battery then this is the right combination for you
CyanogenMod 9 + Hurtsky's Kernel.
and update Playstore Service 4.1.32
iwjosi said:
cm9 has the best battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone tell me which one of the CM9 Asradu posted kernels is the best for battery life? Thanks in advance!
Just wondering, since Kitkat is optimise for low RAM, does cm9 consume large amount of ram?
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
P.S. Time for school, not much time for XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Irwenzhao said:
Apparently Google claimed that 4.4 KitKat is designed for low-end phones. So use CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im confused, I still see many reports indicating high battery drain on CM11.
btw, currently using "CM09 (EOL final) + Hurtsky's Kernel REV10" but want to know if I would have better options for extended battery performance.
thanks in advance, regards
Problem with installing khan kernel
LS.xD said:
For me DarkCM11 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2618851 works pretty good. I use KhaN Kernel v1.5 http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593327 and its runs pretty fluently + battery life is good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Sirvanparaste said:
Hi, I am new to installing ROM, I have study about 3 days and decided to apply darkCM11 with khan kernel, as you mentioned,
I installed CM11 and it worked, but The device was warm and battery drained fast, I installed it again with following tuterials and format sdcard0 this time, it get better but the main problem is to install/flash another kernel or update like khan kernel or philz touch, they are failed with status 7 ,
I tried to removed assert line from updater_script but it didn't work, It seems the os is now heavier than these works and I am confused right now,
please help me :
1- what to do first, should I install CM11 from scratch ?
2- for istalling khan kernel should I install Philz touch? and if so, what I should to do with the status 7 problem
I have installed CMR 6.0.4.5 and it works,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still got issues?
I can send you instructions via pm. Just tell me if you need...
Which kernel is best and most stable to use with stock ROM as I'm new to this device just seeing what other users opinions are that have been using it for some time.
Also does Odin have to be used for flashing is can it be done threw the standard procedure of going into recovery and flashing via install zip?
Thanks in advance
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
Most stable is the kernel by arco68 made for rooted stock roms.
Yes, some kernels can be flashed via CWM provided they are the correct format.
Whosat said:
Most stable is the kernel by arco68 made for rooted stock roms.
Yes, some kernels can be flashed via CWM provided they are the correct format.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you be able to link that kernel thread as the 1 I have found closest to that was 1 based on arco68 kernel.
Thanks again for the help and responses much appreciated.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
Scopewiz said:
Would you be able to link that kernel thread as the 1 I have found closest to that was 1 based on arco68 kernel.
Thanks again for the help and responses much appreciated.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=43622999
Optional: Flash GT-I9195_Kernel_v1.zip to use a custom stock kernel, which might fix battery drain for some.
Kernel changelog: https://github.com/arco/android_kernel_samsung_msm8930-common/commits/stock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its an attachment in the post
I noticed that before as I used that guide for rooting but was looking for a kernel with a few more features but if this is the best to date I'll stick with that, thanks again.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
You're looking for stability so that's the most stable.
I'm personally using f4ktion's 1.3.6 but that version is currently only for AOSP roms. Sticking with Samsung stock roms you only have f4ktion's 1.3.0 to play with but some have reported that its features (BLN) are not working.
Vikinger Kernel is based on arcos modified stock kernel with the extra of bln-feature. Should be as stable as arcos. Never faced unstability and I am using it since release
junkyde said:
Vikinger Kernel is based on arcos modified stock kernel with the extra of bln-feature. Should be as stable as arcos. Never faced unstability and I am using it since release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you talking about his kernel? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47893414
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
yes
My favourite would be F4ktion's, and I spent the last week on it.
Unfortunately the wifi seems to be broken - works at first, but sooner or later (typically within a few hours) something happens, phone becomes hot, wifi can't be switched off, and everything becomes laggy.
Battery will last two-three hours once that happens and the phone will blame wifi for 90% of battery usage.
Only reboot fixes it, until it happens again.
During the last week I was experimenting with different solutions such as using stock's configuration files (the stuff under etc/firmware/wlan/prima) as well as trying to replace the prima kernel module from other kernels. Nothing helped.
(well, most of my attempts made wifi not work lol, the few that worked didn't fix the problem)
If anyone has any ideas what else to try, it would be great -- the kernel was great otherwise (after lowering minimal frequency down to 160-ish MHz battery prediction exceeded 6 days, and that's before I undervolted anything).
In the meantime I'm on Vikinger's kernel - not because I use its features but because installing it was the easiest way to get wifi working again,
Does Vikinger's custom kernel support performance control where you can change clock support etc?
Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk
Scopewiz said:
Does Vikinger's custom kernel support performance control where you can change clock support etc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
No clock change beyond what stock has, no undervolting.
It doesn't have any interesting governors either.
like I said. It's just arcos kernel with the extra of bln support. you could have get that information from the first post of the vikinger kernel thread. all features are mentioned there
Hello, I have got a Nexus 7 2013 unlocked bootloader, rooted and running CyanogenMod 12.1 nightly. Recently I have tryed to install the Franco Kernel since i have heard a lot of good things about it, but whenever i do, it reboots into a very laggy CyanogenMod 12.1 boot animation and goes into a bootloop. I have tried installing through recovery and through the non pro version of the Franco Kernel app. The only way i could fix it is by installing the CyanogenMod 12.1 ROM again. Any help would be much appreciated
hassanz519 said:
Hello, I have got a Nexus 7 2013 unlocked bootloader, rooted and running CyanogenMod 12.1 nightly. Recently I have tryed to install the Franco Kernel since i have heard a lot of good things about it, but whenever i do, it reboots into a very laggy CyanogenMod 12.1 boot animation and goes into a bootloop. I have tried installing through recovery and through the non pro version of the Franco Kernel app. The only way i could fix it is by installing the CyanogenMod 12.1 ROM again. Any help would be much appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's because the kernel isn't compatible with cm12, cm and stock are built in a different way and a cm kernel is not compatible with stock and vice versa..
If you ever see a laggy bootanimation after flashing a kernel you can be 99,9% sure that it is not compatible with your rom
Sent from my GT-S7275R using XDA Free mobile app
noahvt said:
That's because the kernel isn't compatible with cm12, cm and stock are built in a different way and a cm kernel is not compatible with stock and vice versa..
If you ever see a laggy bootanimation after flashing a kernel you can be 99,9% sure that it is not compatible with your rom
Sent from my GT-S7275R using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man, explains a lot, glad to have got a reply on my first thread
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Forums
noahvt said:
That's because the kernel isn't compatible with cm12, cm and stock are built in a different way and a cm kernel is not compatible with stock and vice versa..
If you ever see a laggy bootanimation after flashing a kernel you can be 99,9% sure that it is not compatible with your rom
Sent from my GT-S7275R using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know of any kernels compatible with CyanogenMod 12.1. Thanks in advance
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Forums
Use the CAF version of a kernel for CM or CM-based roms. Use AOSP for stock or aosp-based roms.
Franco doesn't have a caf version but most of the other kernels do.