[Q] Best trickster mod settings? - Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A

Hey guys, can you suggest me some good trickster mod settings for good batter and performance? Right now I'm kinda like a noob, don't know much about the settings.
Thanks in advance!

rajatmendus said:
Hey guys, can you suggest me some good trickster mod settings for good batter and performance? Right now I'm kinda like a noob, don't know much about the settings.
Thanks in advance!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will depend differently for each different kernel. If you want performance, set the minimum and maximum frequency to the highest stable and governor to performance.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2017715

Username invalid said:
It will depend differently for each different kernel. If you want performance, set the minimum and maximum frequency to the highest stable and governor to performance.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2017715
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the link! Can you suggest me some good voltage settings?

rajatmendus said:
Thanks for the link! Can you suggest me some good voltage settings?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should see something like this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
with a set millivolt for each frequency. You can generally undervolt 50-100 mV while remaining stable.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2072087

Undervolting doesn't make a difference in power consumption. The Snapdragon S4 has AVS (Adaptive Voltage Scaling).
The voltage you are setting is only an initial value, immediately after a frequency switch, AVS kicks in and auto-selects the optimal voltage. You don't get ANY power consumption benefit from undervolting, but you risk crashing the CPU during the brief period before AVS kicks in. (I've done power measurements.)
AVS appears to be always active and can't be disabled.
Username invalid said:
You should see something like this
[images removed]
with a set millivolt for each frequency. You can generally undervolt 50-100 mV while remaining stable.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2072087
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That thread is about a phone with Exynos CPU - very different thing.

tni.andro said:
Undervolting doesn't make a difference in power consumption. The Snapdragon S4 has AVS (Adaptive Voltage Scaling).
The voltage you are setting is only an initial value, immediately after a frequency switch, AVS kicks in and auto-selects the optimal voltage. You don't get ANY power consumption benefit from undervolting, but you risk crashing the CPU during the brief period before AVS kicks in. (I've done power measurements.)
AVS appears to be always active and can't be disabled.
That thread is about a phone with Exynos CPU - very different thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, the Snapdragon 600 CPU does have dynamic GPU and voltage. Since he is a noob, the thread that I linked was just to give some general information on frequency, scaling, under/overclocking, and stability testing. Learning how to undervolt can be transferable to another device in the future.

Username invalid said:
You should see something like this
with a set millivolt for each frequency. You can generally undervolt 50-100 mV while remaining stable.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2072087
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks again!
Is franco the best kernel out there for nexus 7?

rajatmendus said:
Thanks again!
Is franco the best kernel out there for nexus 7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2458708

Related

The Best SetCPU Profile?

What's your profile setup?! Here's mine:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(Using Kingx's BFS kernel #1, btw)
Why did you change all of the "on demand" defaults? I never understood the difference, even after reading the release notes.
this will be interesting to follow, just installed this app...
I use conservative.. It's a good medium for performance and battery life.
And for screen off... powersave.
Sent from my HTC Evo 4G using XDA app.
I really don't know the difference between all of the governors, is there a list and a description of what each do?
engagedtosmile said:
I really don't know the difference between all of the governors, is there a list and a description of what each do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this helps a bit ... http://www.pokedev.com/setcpu/
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=758655
i've just started mussing with it.
due to the version of the -snap kernel, i am using conservative as per dev notes.
Using Netarchy-Toastmod 4.1.2 I only have Performance and Conservative.
main: Max: 998 Min: 245 (Conservative)
Profile: Screen Off: Max: 245 Min: 128 (Conservative)
Quadrant: 1281
DraginMagik said:
this helps a bit ... http://www.pokedev.com/setcpu/
i've just started mussing with it.
due to the version of the -snap kernel, i am using conservative as per dev notes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems to be missing some. Like "interactive". Hmm. I tried doing a search for it but its just release logs of adding it.
I don't use profiles because they seem to slow my phone down like mad.
ALL credit goes to shift_
temp > 50c = 422/128 powersave (priority 100)
screen off = 384/245 powersave (priority 98)
battery < 20 = 499/245 powersave (priority 91)
battery < 50 = 768/245 ondemand (priority 84)
charging/full = 1152/768 ondemand (priority 82)
battery < 100 = 1152/768 ondemand (priority 76)
This is the current on i use on cm6 rc2
Heres mine. I just got setcpu, and im still tweaking it, but this seems to be working well.
and to the op, you know your 65.2 degrees C is like 145 degrees F right? I might be wrong, but wouldn't the phone be getting heat damage well before 145 degrees?
And also, I downloaded JuicePlotter, it really helped in telling me how the battery life was affected.
Anyone else going to chime in?
here's what i got, had this setup for a while and so far it's working great:
the governors have to come from the kernel right? bakedkernel 2 doesnt have conservative or powersave. is there any way to add them?
Using 4.1.8 bfs/bfq fresh compatible kernel so far smooth, no issues, satisfactory battery life.

Set CPU

I am Running 2.3,
What profiles should i use? this look alright?
And is it really worth using?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
i like the screen off profile, as that makes a real difference for me in battery life, however i see no point in having battery profiles. do you really want your phone to become slower just because you drop under 50% batt?
normally i would want it to keep going full speed and in the case that im on the road and need to save battery as much as possible i would change the setcpu profile myself (and probably switch off sync and 3g)
Your <30% profile will never kick in, since that is also <50% which has a higher priority.
Newb question: Does one have to have a rooted phone to install Set CPU?
^^^ Yes.
SetCPU needs superuser privileges to do its thing.
Priorities fixed now, I used it with less than 50% and the phone was just as fast doing regular tasks and web browsing
Am just using screen off dont need to use any other settings.
Borat38 said:
Newb question: Does one have to have a rooted phone to install Set CPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You also need a custom kernel, the htc one can only underclock not overclock
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
I just use <30% battery, 768Mhz. I let HAVS do all the rest.
So because I have a custom Rom Leedroid, I dont need to disable the driver?
AndroHero said:
You also need a custom kernel, the htc one can only underclock not overclock
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kalavere said:
I just use <30% battery, 768Mhz. I let HAVS do all the rest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is HAVS?
Also, what's better for batt conservation (w/out sacrificing speed): Undervolting or underclocking?
Borat38 said:
What is HAVS?
Also, what's better for batt conservation (w/out sacrificing speed): Undervolting or underclocking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HAVS is a set of instructions from the kernel governing the CPU, it undervolts and under clocks the CPU when it is not in use. Undervolting and underclocking go hand in hand.
I have just 1 profile:
screen off: max around 384 MHz. and mim 245 MHz.
Does that makes sense? :-O

SetCPU profiles?

Hello all... I'm new to Setcpu and have been able figure out how to OC and UV while still keeping everything relatively stable. As of now I'm experimenting with making profiles, I was wondering if someone could post a screen shoot of their profiles and pass on any advice. I am running TNZ Blend 2.6.2 with the Hitman kernel. Here's a screen shot of what I have so far.
T.I.A.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
The only thing I would comment on is your "screen off" there is no reason for it to be scaling/jumping from 800-1200 "ondemand" while the phone is not being used or the screen is off in general, just have 800 low and high or have 800 as your high and set it to "performance" so that there is no polling being done and it will set itself to the high value which would still be 800 anyway.
You might have a reason for that setting, just trying to save you a little bit more of battery juice.
Definitely bring down that screen off! I have mine set to 200-500 ondemand. I'm sure it'll save you a lot of battery. Also the battery 100% is kinda pointless because that's what the main profile is for. And expect your phone to get extremely hot if you use it while charging since you have it overclocked. I did that same mistake now I keep it at 200-800 to avoid the over heating.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA App
Thanks guys
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Just a recommendation...you should give tegrak a go. I find it to be much more beneficial than setcpu...
Why scale cpu depending on the battery level? I prefer scaling CPU on my phone by the temperature. 1.6Ghz normal usage and then gradually scale it down if it gets too hot. I bought this phone for its performance, not battery life, which actually is pretty amazing for such powerful device.
1brainsurgeon said:
Just a recommendation...you should give tegrak a go. I find it to be much more beneficial than setcpu...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
be careful with Tegrak, as it doesn't work with some of the non stock kernels, and will freeze your phone for sure..
Pretty good. You don't need the battery>100% profile. Adjust that from the main page.
wase4711 said:
be careful with Tegrak, as it doesn't work with some of the non stock kernels, and will freeze your phone for sure..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yikes! I wasn't aware of that. Guess I'll do a bit more research on that before I fire out recommendations. Note to self...not all devices have the same setup as yours

Slow/Laggy CM9 Nightly Fix!

I'm not sure if anyone else was experiencing lag from the new CM9 Nightly like I was after I flashed it.. So I played around with the options and noticed that the CPU governor under "Performance" was set to "Interactive". I switched this to "On Demand" & checked "Set on Boot" and man this phone flies now! Also make sure that the min and max speeds are set correctly.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I dunno, maybe your battery life is going to suck now lol. Let us know how the drain is. If I weren't at work right now I'd be playing with the latest nightly myself.
CM9 is Great! Flashing LU6200 and used X2.
You have succesfully flashed CM9 on LU6200 ?
zhzben said:
CM9 is Great! Flashing LU6200 and used X2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wrote us how u did that! please!
Malnilion said:
I dunno, maybe your battery life is going to suck now lol. Let us know how the drain is. If I weren't at work right now I'd be playing with the latest nightly myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On demand governor draining more battery then interactive one?
Much snappier for me too. Can't report on how it affects battery life yet. With this phone and the newness of the ROM, definitely keep your charger handy.
thank you, I made these changes.
I did a bit of the google to try and find the difference between interactive and on-demand, the nomenclature sure seems similar, but could not find any descriptions of the 2, anybody know?
http://wiki.rootzwiki.com/CPU_Governors
Ondemand
Quickly scales up the CPU frequency once there is sufficient load, and then quickly scales down the frequency once the load is no longer present.
* Pro: Good performance, decent battery life.
* Con: CPU frequency can constantly shoot up and down, causing more power drain than staying at an "ideal" frequency.
Interactive
Quickly ramps up to the maximum allowed frequency, then slowly drops the frequency once no longer under load.
* Pro: Faster to ramp up and down means a snappier response from the device.
* Con: CPU will run quickly for a few moments after it is no longer needed to do so, resulting in longer periods of higher power consumption and heat generation.
I don't notice a major difference in battery drain yet. Still mediocre. But I am willing to sacrifice some life for the absence of lag. I almost reverted back to gingerbread before discovering this minor change fix lol.
Thanks Namuna
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THIS
actually i have a much better battery right now and an almost lag free phone !
I do not recommend enabling KSM as posted above. I found out that ksmd process utilizes cpu by 3-5% for hours!!! It drain battery on my eyes!
FlintPNZ said:
I do not recommend enabling KSM as posted above. I found out that ksmd process utilizes cpu by 3-5% for hours!!! It drain battery on my eyes!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! OP edited. The important change is the CPU governor.
bioan said:
You have succesfully flashed CM9 on LU6200 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently can not

[Q] HTC reduced cpu frequency in update?

Hello, I heard that HTC reduced the processor frequency in "One X", due to the high temperature of tegra and battery lifetime (In update, maybe 1.29?). Is that true?
Sorry, but my english isn't good.
flowerman said:
Hello, I heard that HTC reduced the processor frequency in "One X", due to the high temperature of tegra and battery lifetime (In update, maybe 1.29?). Is that true?
Sorry, but my english isn't good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My AnTuTu score went up so I'm guessing not.
flowerman said:
Hello, I heard that HTC reduced the processor frequency in "One X", due to the high temperature of tegra and battery lifetime (In update, maybe 1.29?). Is that true?
Sorry, but my english isn't good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not reduced just doesn't ramp up as often as before
Thank for answers
I didn't know that antutu shows the cpu frequency
hamdir said:
not reduced just doesn't ramp up as often as before
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did they change the CPU scaling governor?
I remember talk a little while back about On Demand and Interactive governors and which one was best
flowerman said:
Thank for answers
I didn't know that antutu shows the cpu frequency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
antutu only shows what the max speed is and its only 1.5 on a single core, when on 4 cores you can only get 1.2 GHZ and 1.4 GHZ on 2 cores.
look at terga stats at bottom on screens
4 cores bench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2 cores bench
So reduced frequency it's true? Earlier (after updates) unless Tegra 3 had 1.3ghz on 4 cores ?
flowerman said:
So reduced frequency it's true? Earlier (after updates) unless Tegra 3 had 1.3ghz on 4 cores ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No It's always been like this, the update changes how the CPU speeds up and down e.g 50 MHz in idle to max speed, all its done is help the phone use the lowest possible speed to save battery.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium

Categories

Resources