Related
I am quite concerned about internet speed on my Tilt 2 as it really reminds me of dial-up download speeds in the old AOL days. So I just saw the following at: http://www.att-cellphones.org/att-htc-tilt-2-internet-speed-problem.html/ . Does this appear to seem accurate? If not, perhaps it would be good to build a thread that is totally devoted to different techniques for increasing internet speed.
"AT&T fourm posted a AT&T Htc Tilt 2 topic,many users are involved in the discussion,how to fix this this AT&T Htc Tilt 2 internet speed problem?it seems a very troublesome problem,maybe you can found the internet speed on the tilt 1 would and still do clock consistantly 600kbps to 900kbps but my Tilt 2 is clocking around 100kbps.Some people have tried editing the registry I found in one thread,but both settings do nothing, although the EnableHSDPAIcon did make the H appear at the top of the phone for about 3 hours then it went back to 3G.
AT&T HTC Tilt 2 info - AT&T htc tilt 2 internet speed problem accepted solution:
Tilt2 has a different radio than Tilt1. I had similar issue when compare my Pure with my Samsung BJ2. Your registry tweak won’t do a thing for the speed. I suspect the 7.2mbps radio in Tilt2/Pure is having problems with AT&T’s network. But from time to time, I can still manage to get 1 to 1.2 mbps speed without the registry hack. But most times, it will be either 100kbps or 600 kbps, very unstable. And my Pure also get less bars than my BJ2. Something to do with the radio chip HTC uses.
So, to re-cap, the registry hack is unecessary unless you just want to see H icon instead of 3G icon. Even with the hack I tried, if you reboot the phone a few times, the H icon will no longer show up.
So, save your time and let AT&T sort out this thing.
This maybe not the really accepted solution,hope AT&T will fix this problem as soon as possible."
zylix said:
I am quite concerned about internet speed on my Tilt 2 as it really reminds me of dial-up download speeds in the old AOL days. So I just saw the following at: http://www.att-cellphones.org/att-htc-tilt-2-internet-speed-problem.html/ . Does this appear to seem accurate? If not, perhaps it would be good to build a thread that is totally devoted to different techniques for increasing internet speed.
"AT&T fourm posted a AT&T Htc Tilt 2 topic,many users are involved in the discussion,how to fix this this AT&T Htc Tilt 2 internet speed problem?it seems a very troublesome problem,maybe you can found the internet speed on the tilt 1 would and still do clock consistantly 600kbps to 900kbps but my Tilt 2 is clocking around 100kbps.Some people have tried editing the registry I found in one thread,but both settings do nothing, although the EnableHSDPAIcon did make the H appear at the top of the phone for about 3 hours then it went back to 3G.
AT&T HTC Tilt 2 info - AT&T htc tilt 2 internet speed problem accepted solution:
Tilt2 has a different radio than Tilt1. I had similar issue when compare my Pure with my Samsung BJ2. Your registry tweak won’t do a thing for the speed. I suspect the 7.2mbps radio in Tilt2/Pure is having problems with AT&T’s network. But from time to time, I can still manage to get 1 to 1.2 mbps speed without the registry hack. But most times, it will be either 100kbps or 600 kbps, very unstable. And my Pure also get less bars than my BJ2. Something to do with the radio chip HTC uses.
So, to re-cap, the registry hack is unecessary unless you just want to see H icon instead of 3G icon. Even with the hack I tried, if you reboot the phone a few times, the H icon will no longer show up.
So, save your time and let AT&T sort out this thing.
This maybe not the really accepted solution,hope AT&T will fix this problem as soon as possible."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont know what you are talking about I get between 1.5 to 2 mbps with the stock radio...My suggestion would be to energy rom then you will get speed.
I see the same problem with the Tilt2 data connection. It is very slow. Generally, if i launch a web page on the Tilt2, i have time to get up, walk to the study, log into my computer and pull the page up on the computer before it ever loads on the Tilt2. I also dont get a huge benefit going over the wireless network either.
My wife has the Pure and she has the same problem.
Yes, it is amazing to me. It seems like there are folks in the forum that seem to believe this is not an issue that the phone comes this way out of the box -- despite the fact that there are a lot of people like yourself that report the same exact issue. In cases like this there seems to be a belief that this is okay assuming the phone can be souped-up. While this may be so: a) it would be like buying a brand new higher end car that has very limited acceleration (0 to 60 in 5 minutes) assuming you can work on it to speed it up; and b) there really are no specific directions on how this souping-up may be achieved.
One person above recommended an Energy Rom, however, I have reservations about using this given that I am not sure how this will work for the Tilt2, do not want to void my ability to return the phone to ATT if it does not get better, do not want to turn the phone into a brick and do not really know much about how to find the latest copy and install it (although I have researched the installation and could take a stab).
If there is anyone in this online community that can provide some support along these lines, I would appreciate it. Thanks.
zylix said:
Yes, it is amazing to me. It seems like there are folks in the forum that seem to believe this is not an issue that the phone comes this way out of the box -- despite the fact that there are a lot of people like yourself that report the same exact issue. In cases like this there seems to be a belief that this is okay assuming the phone can be souped-up. While this may be so: a) it would be like buying a brand new higher end car that has very limited acceleration (0 to 60 in 5 minutes) assuming you can work on it to speed it up; and b) there really are no specific directions on how this souping-up may be achieved.
One person above recommended an Energy Rom, however, I have reservations about using this given that I am not sure how this will work for the Tilt2, do not want to void my ability to return the phone to ATT if it does not get better, do not want to turn the phone into a brick and do not really know much about how to find the latest copy and install it (although I have researched the installation and could take a stab).
If there is anyone in this online community that can provide some support along these lines, I would appreciate it. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All you have to do is go to the Rhodium Flashing thread and read all the info you need is right here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=550540
Then go here to the Energy rom thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=553506
after you flash this rom on your tilt 2 then install the attached cab to remap you hardware keyboard
After you do all that your phone will be 2 to 3 times faster.
Hello all,
I currently am running Myn's WarmTwoPointTwo RLS5 (but tried Fresh 3.5.0.1 as well) and am having problems with very slow wireless tethering on 4G. If I run a speed test on my tethered laptop, I will be lucky to hit 1Mbps. However, on the phone (even if tethering is turned on) a speed test will yield about 5-6Mbps. For some reason it's as if the tethering speed is being throttled down to 3G speeds even though I'm connected to 4G.
I've tried various versions of the Wireless Tether app, and even the "fix" (deleted the fixroute.sh file) and still no luck. Other people are also reporting this problem here - EVO slow tether - Android Forums
I was just hoping perhaps someone could shed some light on this issue.
Thanks.
link00seven said:
Hello all,
I currently am running Myn's WarmTwoPointTwo RLS5 (but tried Fresh 3.5.0.1 as well) and am having problems with very slow wireless tethering on 4G. If I run a speed test on my tethered laptop, I will be lucky to hit 1Mbps. However, on the phone (even if tethering is turned on) a speed test will yield about 5-6Mbps. For some reason it's as if the tethering speed is being throttled down to 3G speeds even though I'm connected to 4G.
I've tried various versions of the Wireless Tether app, and even the "fix" (deleted the fixroute.sh file) and still no luck. Other people are also reporting this problem here - EVO slow tether - Android Forums
I was just hoping perhaps someone could shed some light on this issue.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before today, I was one of those people who used the Wireless Tether app often. I had awful DSL internet service and tethering wireless via 4G was a GODsend. The speeds I were getting was comparable to typical 4G speeds. I posted a speedtest a while back in the Warm TwoPointTwo RLS5 thread, if I'm not mistaken. I may try searching for it a little later. Anyway, I cannot explain why you're tethering very slowly. That has never been my experience. Without offending you, are you basing those slow speeds ONLY on speedtest results? If so, please keep in mind that those tests are, in my opinion, inconclusive. Are the tethering speeds you're experiencing satisfying to your real life surfing needs? If they are, disregard speedtest results and enjoy the fact that you can tether multiple devices for FREE.
dougjamal said:
Before today, I was one of those people who used the Wireless Tether app often. I had awful DSL internet service and tethering wireless via 4G was a GODsend. The speeds I were getting was comparable to typical 4G speeds. I posted a speedtest a while back in the Warm TwoPointTwo RLS5 thread, if I'm not mistaken. I may try searching for it a little later. Anyway, I cannot explain why you're tethering very slowly. That has never been my experience. Without offending you, are you basing those slow speeds ONLY on speedtest results? If so, please keep in mind that those tests are, in my opinion, inconclusive. Are the tethering speeds you're experiencing satisfying to your real life surfing needs? If they are, disregard speedtest results and enjoy the fact that you can tether multiple devices for FREE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
None taken mate - to be honest I probably haven't really used it enough just yet to say one way or another. In Metro Detroit, one of the first 4G towers just went online at Wayne State University, where I happen to go to school. So the last couple days I've been using it and today tried tethering to my laptop for the first time. I did use a couple different speed test applications, and found that on the phone I could consistently get 4-6Mbps, whereas on my computer the speed test was averaging closer to 1Mbps. Significantly slower, so I did a little research on it and found that others were also having the same issue (hence the thread I linked in my first post). I'd test it more, but at home I don't have 4G access, just at school.
However, the little bit of basic surfing that I did seemed fine, and perhaps even if for whatever reason I'm not getting the speeds advertised, it still was very much usable. I did not mean to sound ungrateful by any means and am just thrilled to see a sign of 4G around here. Tethering isn't even something I would probably be doing all that often, as WSU has wifi everywhere, and my internet at home is quite solid.
I only posted to see if anyone on here had similar issues and if there was a solution, and to perhaps help others that may also be having issues with 4G wireless tethering.
For some reaason I never liked wireless and have been using usb. I might have an issue with my laptp but can not be sure. I like CM7 GB it seems to switch between 3G and 4G where the other roms did not, Do any of the thether aps 2 google code work any differently?
link00seven said:
None taken mate - to be honest I probably haven't really used it enough just yet to say one way or another. In Metro Detroit, one of the first 4G towers just went online at Wayne State University, where I happen to go to school. So the last couple days I've been using it and today tried tethering to my laptop for the first time. I did use a couple different speed test applications, and found that on the phone I could consistently get 4-6Mbps, whereas on my computer the speed test was averaging closer to 1Mbps. Significantly slower, so I did a little research on it and found that others were also having the same issue (hence the thread I linked in my first post). I'd test it more, but at home I don't have 4G access, just at school.
However, the little bit of basic surfing that I did seemed fine, and perhaps even if for whatever reason I'm not getting the speeds advertised, it still was very much usable. I did not mean to sound ungrateful by any means and am just thrilled to see a sign of 4G around here. Tethering isn't even something I would probably be doing all that often, as WSU has wifi everywhere, and my internet at home is quite solid.
I only posted to see if anyone on here had similar issues and if there was a solution, and to perhaps help others that may also be having issues with 4G wireless tethering.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely understand and thank you for the reply, sir......Enjoy your day.
conductive said:
For some reaason I never liked wireless and have been using usb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I understand and if tethering via USB is more comfortable for you than tethering wirelessly, so be it. It's your prerogative.
I might have an issue with my laptp but can not be sure. I like CM7 GB it seems to switch between 3G and 4G where the other roms did not, Do any of the thether aps 2 google code work any differently?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Every rom that I've used that allows me to use the 4G function have all automatically switched back & forth between 3G & 4G depending on the strength of the 4G signal or your location in regard to a 4G area. That is normal and the app is irrelevant. I hope I didn't misunderstand your post....
dougjamal said:
I completely understand and thank you for the reply, sir......Enjoy your day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, you too.
I haven't tried USB tethering with 4G yet, but one of the main draws for wireless tethering for me would be so I could use it on my iPad, as I only have the wifi iPad.
link00seven said:
Thanks, you too.
I haven't tried USB tethering with 4G yet, but one of the main draws for wireless tethering for me would be so I could use it on my iPad, as I only have the wifi iPad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will indeed work, my friend. I've tether my MacBook and y daughter's iPhone4 in addition to the other wireless device in the house and they all performed without a hitch. Now that I have my Roadrunner service, I doubt I'll use it as much....Take care and enjoy your day...
Aug 1st Time Warner cable was installed next door, my 4G blew and I got a new phone. Now my speed is only about 1Mb and looks as if the phone is not stable or the speed tests are having a difficult time getting data. I took my phone down the street a less than a block where I could achieve 6 to 10Mb possibly even more.
I think it is TWC but it could be an Edison smart meter or other.
Is there a noise app that could help me pinpoint the noise source?
Should I call Sprint?
Any good ideas on how to handle this issue?
Thanks
That's something I would like to know as well, I have a train yard next to my house and can't get 4g anywhere near it but it works a few blocks away.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
I can say that there are 10 warehouse/offices which all have smart meters in the rear. To the best of my knowledge these meters are transmitting a whopping 5W @ 900MHZ 24x7
Is 13MB a realistic number or is noise making 4G look hotter than it really is? Any othe experiences or ideas.
conductive said:
This is getting really weird. On the roof I I get 1O-13Mb with speedtest.net. As soon as I start tethering to a laptop I only get a really crappy/unstable 1MB (starts high but does not hold) and get an abnormally high upload of 1.5+MB via DSLR flash speed test.
If I tether from inside on the front of the building near the roof I get 2.5-3Mb. This number is pretty consistent with the speedtest.net results on the phone.
I can say that there are 10 warehouse/offices which all have smart meters in the rear. To the best of my knowledge these meters are transmitting a whopping 5W @ 900MHZ 24x7
Do these meters mess up 4G a tether ing computer or? Is 13MB a realistic number or is noise making 4G look hotter than it really is? Any othe experiences or ideas. I have been trying to keep with usb tether in an attempt to lower noise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember reading just a few days ago that someone was having a similar issue when they started to tether. They fixed the speed issue buy setting up a proxy on the PC and they got their full 4G speeds while tethering. It was 4G over WIFI when they had the issue but maybe the same steps will help you out as well.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=966418
Also, I use to work for TWCable. If the tech did a crappy job of the install and did not put fittings on the cables properly and used wrong equipment those cable lines can leak quite a bit of signal. They have techs that drive around once a month with a special detector and GPS to pick up where they have leaks in the aera and then report them to their supervisors, then they end up heading out to fix them if they are bad enough. That stuff can interfere with the bands that emergency vehicles/planes/phones use and they have to legally keep that stuff under control. So you could call TWCable and let them know they need to come out and check for signal leaks.
Video is a nosy ***** but I can not be 100% sure if it is the video, smart meter or other. I can say that I started having proplems on Aug 1 the day that TWC was installed next door. The thing about TWC is it is somewhat shielded even when leaking and a smart meter is not. I am tempted to put a 75 ohm terminator on the cable to see if that helps.
I have been tethering for over a year w/o problems w/o proxy. I could be wrong, but feel that the proxy simply helps hold an internet connection when you have a weak single and changing IP addresses. I thought I solved any need for that by placing my phone way above the building. That is also a really old thread with people on sense roms and CM7 is typically quite solid.
Thanks for the good information. Do we know what frequency TWC operates on?
conductive said:
Video is a nosy ***** but I can not be 100% sure if it is the video, smart meter or other. I can say that I started having proplems on Aug 1 the day that TWC was installed next door. The thing about TWC is it is somewhat shielded even when leaking and a smart meter is not. I am tempted to put a 75 ohm terminator on the cable to see if that helps.
I have been tethering for over a year w/o problems w/o proxy. I could be wrong, but feel that the proxy simply helps hold an internet connection when you have a weak single and changing IP addresses. I thought I solved any need for that by placing my phone way above the building. That is also a really old thread with people on sense roms and CM7 is typically quite solid.
Thanks for the good information. Do we know what frequency TWC operates on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its alot. every channel is a 6MHz increase. So say channel 32 is 20MHz then channel 33 is at 26MHz. Its been a few years since I worked for them. I dont really remember what frequency they run on. I know some are in the 10's other in the 100's. I just tried Googling it, but couldn't find a current list.
Honestly I would just give them a call and let them know ever since they came out that you have been having issues. They'll send a tech out to take a look.
i tried different modems and i found the number one for my galaxy s3 that is L10VPBLIF,,so for 3g is very fast and keep my signal vey strenght ,,,what about u?....
The optimal modem will be different from person to person based on location. LIF might be best for you, but it might not be as good as LIH(for example) for someone somewhere else.
I personally don't notice enough of a difference to care, I try to download large things on wifi anyways, because it always seems faster than 4g
It's mostly placebo anyways.
Broded said:
The optimal modem will be different from person to person based on location. LIF might be best for you, but it might not be as good as LIH(for example) for someone somewhere else.
I personally don't notice enough of a difference to care, I try to download large things on wifi anyways, because it always seems faster than 4g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you right!!! depend which rom u have and the device and also kernel i think but for me in boston that works fine,,,,
Please read forum rules before posting
Questions go in Q&A
Thread moved
And best is what is best for you. It is different for everybody.
I can tell you with CQI, RSRP, and RSRQ numbers to back it up that LIx basebands are better than LJ7 for LTE. Why Sprint went with whatever they did in LJ7, while being FAR better than ICS basebands, disappointed me. I know this because I have mapped 63,839 data points in Sensorly in the past month for a realistic LTE coverage map versus Sprint's flat-out lies they show on their own map.
Mutiny,
Do you publish that information anywhere? I'd like to see what you've mapped in KC.
[NG]Owner
I too would be grateful to see what you've compiled...
Mutiny32 said:
I can tell you with CQI, RSRP, and RSRQ numbers to back it up that LIx basebands are better than LJ7 for LTE. Why Sprint went with whatever they did in LJ7, while being FAR better than ICS basebands, disappointed me. I know this because I have mapped 63,839 data points in Sensorly in the past month for a realistic LTE coverage map versus Sprint's flat-out lies they show on their own map.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been trying a variety of ROMs and Modem. For instance, tried the LJ7 modem yesterday and that just didn't work. I couldn't get a decent data connection on 3G or 4G. Then I went back to the LI3, which I had been using for a while and I had a great 4G connection for a while. Then it dropped out and no matter what I have done thus far I can't get it back, even when I step outside where I can usually get a signal. I mentioned to someone yesterday it's like the Sprint LTE service is operating like a rotating airport light (the green and white lights that I recall from my youth I watched race across the night sky). The beam of service sweeps by and you get it for a flash. I'm really missing the consistency of WiMax on my EVO.
I have been a Sprint customer since late 1997 and to date I can't recall a more frustrating episode with a system roll-out.
I ran across this DSLReports article too and thought it was interesting. http: // goo.gl / ntXCC
Thanks for your post and if you share your research count me among the highly interested.
--Randall
ALBERTOSCLN said:
i tried different modems and i found the number one for my galaxy s3 that is L10VPBLIF,,so for 3g is very fast and keep my signal vey strenght ,,,what about u?....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried any roms yet thats why im asking
samsung GSIII rooted
---------- Post added at 07:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:13 PM ----------
Broded said:
The optimal modem will be different from person to person based on location. LIF might be best for you, but it might not be as good as LIH(for example) for someone somewhere else.
I personally don't notice enough of a difference to care, I try to download large things on wifi anyways, because it always seems faster than 4g
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can dig it but only thing about wifi i hate is you gotta be around a connection I've had this phone 4days and haven't seen my phone use 4G lte yet
samsung GSIII rooted
In order to get the most out of my FireTV/Kodi setup, last week I switched to Comcast cable for their 105mbps service. The first few days, Speedtest.net showed a download speed of around 50mbps on both my computer and my FireTV. Last night, I was experiencing some buffering issues, which had totally disappeared the first few days with Comcast, so I did some more speed tests. I was excited to see speeds of 125mbps on my computer, but totally bummed to see that my FireTV was only reporting around 7 or 8mbps.
Why would there be such drastic performance differences between my computer and my FireTV? I would think some kind of issue arising over the long ethernet cable, but they were reporting consistent speeds between the two when I first got Comcast last weekend.
Raymondo17 said:
In order to get the most out of my FireTV/Kodi setup, last week I switched to Comcast cable for their 105mbps service. The first few days, Speedtest.net showed a download speed of around 50mbps on both my computer and my FireTV. Last night, I was experiencing some buffering issues, which had totally disappeared the first few days with Comcast, so I did some more speed tests. I was excited to see speeds of 125mbps on my computer, but totally bummed to see that my FireTV was only reporting around 7 or 8mbps.
Why would there be such drastic performance differences between my computer and my FireTV? I would think some kind of issue arising over the long ethernet cable, but they were reporting consistent speeds between the two when I first got Comcast last weekend.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's kind of a drastic drop. I'd suspect the Ethernet cable. Longer cords will slow it down a*bit but more than likely it's a problem with the cable. How is it run? Is it possible it got squeezed?
Hardwired is always better but not always feasible. I bought my own modem and router. I actually get the speeds Comcast promises over WiFi with better range. Saving the monthly fee for Comcast equipment doesn't quite even out--it'll take years but my network is much better after switching.
Btw--have you tried the speedtests over WiFi? Sometimes my WiFi speeds beat hardwired but with WiFi you need to deal with interference.
As for cables and buffering, if there's something wrong with the cable it'll cause issues. It's like a race car going over 200 mph and hitting even a small bump. I use to drive my wife nuts with cables running through the house (I'm not much of a craftsman) But even though buffering is a part of xbmc I really don't experience much. And when I do it's usually fixed through power cycling the router. Of course if we're streaming it doesn't always matter how fast our internet is. If the server it comes from is slow, there's nothing you can do to speed it up.
***when I asked you to test WiFi speeds I assume you have dual band. 2.4ghz is craps imo. Another reason to buy your own router. In my area you only get 5ghz if you rent more equipment from Comcast.
Thanks for the response.
KLit75 said:
That's kind of a drastic drop. I'd suspect the Ethernet cable. Longer cords will slow it down a*bit but more than likely it's a problem with the cable. How is it run? Is it possible it got squeezed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that it sounds like a cable issue, but would that explain why we were getting mediocre but consistent speeds between the computer and Fire TV, and now the computer speeds are blazing and the Fire TV is limping along? I did the measurements when no activity was going on, so I don't think the initial 50mbps tests were because the computer and Fire TV were evenly splitting the signal. And I haven't touched the cable since it was installed, so I don't know how it could have gotten squeezed between last weekend and now.
KLit75 said:
Btw--have you tried the speedtests over WiFi? Sometimes my WiFi speeds beat hardwired but with WiFi you need to deal with interference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't yet. One thing I did try was using different speed test websites. I wound up getting totally different figures (shown in mbps):
• Speedtest.net: 125
• att.com/speedtest: 27.16
• speedof.me: 40.62
• cnet.com/internet-speed-test: 31.39
• bandwidthplace.com: 37.52
• myverizon.com: 20.79
• timewarnercable.com: 122.58
Plus many more that totally fluctuated. Oddly, all of the upload speeds were consistent at around 12mbps.
Good suggestion to power cycle the router. I'll try that this evening and report back.
Raymondo17 said:
In order to get the most out of my FireTV/Kodi setup, last week I switched to Comcast cable for their 105mbps service. The first few days, Speedtest.net showed a download speed of around 50mbps on both my computer and my FireTV. Last night, I was experiencing some buffering issues, which had totally disappeared the first few days with Comcast, so I did some more speed tests. I was excited to see speeds of 125mbps on my computer, but totally bummed to see that my FireTV was only reporting around 7 or 8mbps.
Why would there be such drastic performance differences between my computer and my FireTV? I would think some kind of issue arising over the long ethernet cable, but they were reporting consistent speeds between the two when I first got Comcast last weekend.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raymondo17 said:
Thanks for the response.
I wish I could speak more confidently about it but what I've learned is networking is pretty complicated. I was happy to buy a router that was open source ready but what I learned was it's a lot different than having superuser privs on a rooted device. I've learned a lot but
I agree that it sounds like a cable issue, but would that explain why we were getting mediocre but consistent speeds between the computer and Fire TV, and now the computer speeds are blazing and the Fire TV is limping along? I did the measurements when no activity was going on, so I don't think the initial 50mbps tests were because the computer and Fire TV were evenly splitting the signal. And I haven't touched the cable since it was installed, so I don't know how it could have gotten squeezed between last weekend and now.
I haven't yet. One thing I did try was using different speed test websites. I wound up getting totally different figures (shown in mbps):
• Speedtest.net: 125
• att.com/speedtest: 27.16
• speedof.me: 40.62
• cnet.com/internet-speed-test: 31.39
• bandwidthplace.com: 37.52
• myverizon.com: 20.79
• timewarnercable.com: 122.58
Plus many more that totally fluctuated. Oddly, all of the upload speeds were consistent at around 12mbps.
Good suggestion to power cycle the router. I'll try that this evening and report back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Speed tests can be effected by many factors. I find speed test.net to be most accurate. When it comes to networks, it can be a lot more complicated than it seems but most of the*issues I've spent hours or days agonizing over could've been solved by something as simple as a new cable. One time my speed test were fast but video kept buffering. I spent weeks troubleshooting. 2 techs came to my house. The 2nd was smart enough to check the cable outside my house. I live near the ocean and it got corroded. So it would register as fast but it was prone to frequent issues. That's why I always look for the simplest solution.
Also, I don't get too hung up on speedtests anymore. To this day my living room aftv still tests faster on 5ghz than wired but I keep it wired.
One wall away my other aftv is WiFi testing at around 100 mbps while the wired one tests at around 80 to 85. Oh and forgot to mention WiFi antennas aren't all the same either. My Mac is about 30 feet farther away from the router than WiFi aftv and Mac Always tests over 130 mbps.
I could go on but just so you don't get too hung up on figuring this out--keep the troubleshooting basic to start. Then if it's still giving you problems look deeper into it. Good luck!
After another frustrating night of aftv buffering, I sent my wife to bed and started yanking on cables and running speed tests. The simple act of turning off my PS3 and unplugging and plugging ethernet cables seemed to get me up from 8mbps to 25mbps. Swapping out a brand new Monoprice Cat6 cable for a Cat5e cable that Comcast had left behind bumped me up to around 30mbps. Still not the 50mbps I was experiencing when I first switched to Comcast, but better.
Then something KLit75 mentioned about testing my WiFi speed popped into my head, so I gave that a whirl. Speedtest reported 80mbps! I tripled my speed by going to WiFi! :good:
KLit75 said:
To this day my living room aftv still tests faster on 5ghz than wired but I keep it wired.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So why don't you go WiFi? I'm kinda old school, and I learned to always go hardwired whenever possible. But I think in this instance, if the speedtest numbers tell the real story here, I'd be way better off going with the WiFi, no?
I replayed the show we were watching that kept buffering on us earlier in the evening (an episode of Town of the Living Dead), and this time it played smooth as silk. Even the gray progress bar scooted happily along, picking up more and more space ahead of the playhead as the show progressed. I'm psyched!
I do recall during the rooting process that being on WiFi held some danger of Amazon updating my software on me, but since I completed the rooting process successfully and, if I remember correctly, in the process turned off the ability for Amazon to do auto updates in the process, I'm not in any danger of losing my root via an auto-update from Amazon, am I?
You mean "root"? You're good. I believe you're thinking of the root guide. It's easier to get to the registration page with ethernet. But once you're rooted there is absolutely no danger of losing root via WiFi (at last no more so than with Ethernet.)
As for why I don't go WiFi when speed tests are faster...
1. 80mbps, for what I stream is more than fast enough.
2. It's like I mentioned earlier, no interference, provided your cable is in good health.
3. Speed tests aren't always the best way to measure quality.
***I hardwire when I can. That no longer extends to running a long cable through my house. I certainly could but why would I ? I stream fine over WiFi.
But like I said, just because it registers as faster on a speed testdoesn't meaner it's stronger in terms of not getting weakened by external factors.
Before I landed on hardwiring, I made sure I tested 3 different cables. The results actually were different and I just went with the cable that had the fastest speed test result. My rule of thumb--if it's within a few feet of my router I hardwired. And there is one weak spot in my house (my son's room) so I bought him a plugin power line adapter. He only needs it for gaming.
KLit75 said:
You mean "root"? You're good. I believe you're thinking of the root guide. It's easier to get to the registration page with ethernet. But once you're rooted there is absolutely no danger of losing root via WiFi (at last no more so than with Ethernet.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. Yes, I meant "root," not "boot." I realized my doof, I mean, goof, and edited the post moments before I got your reply. Hey, it was pretty late when I posted, I'm surprised it wasn't more skewed than that.
Right after I posted, I went and checked my speed one more time before hitting the hay. For whatever reason, it was down from 80 to 30mbps, so I went to bed in a bad mood. But this morning I was getting 70mbps, so... I'll try not to let the speed tests drive me crazy. As long as I can get away from the frequent buffering of streaming content, I'll be happy.
Many thanks, KLit75, for your input on this. I really appreciate you takin' the time.
Raymondo17 said:
After another frustrating night of aftv buffering, I sent my wife to bed and started yanking on cables and running speed tests. The simple act of turning off my PS3 and unplugging and plugging ethernet cables seemed to get me up from 8mbps to 25mbps. Swapping out a brand new Monoprice Cat6 cable for a Cat5e cable that Comcast had left behind bumped me up to around 30mbps. Still not the 50mbps I was experiencing when I first switched to Comcast, but better.
Then something KLit75 mentioned about testing my WiFi speed popped into my head, so I gave that a whirl. Speedtest reported 80mbps! I tripled my speed by going to WiFi! :good:
So why don't you go WiFi? I'm kinda old school, and I learned to always go hardwired whenever possible. But I think in this instance, if the speedtest numbers tell the real story here, I'd be way better off going with the WiFi, no?
I replayed the show we were watching that kept buffering on us earlier in the evening (an episode of Town of the Living Dead), and this time it played smooth as silk. Even the gray progress bar scooted happily along, picking up more and more space ahead of the playhead as the show progressed. I'm psyched!
I do recall during the rooting process that being on WiFi held some danger of Amazon updating my software on me, but since I completed the rooting process successfully and, if I remember correctly, in the process turned off the ability for Amazon to do auto updates in the process, I'm not in any danger of losing my root via an auto-update from Amazon, am I?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raymondo17 said:
Lol. Yes, I meant "root," not "boot." I realized my doof, I mean, goof, and edited the post moments before I got your reply. Hey, it was pretty late when I posted, I'm surprised it wasn't more skewed than that.
Right after I posted, I went and checked my speed one more time before hitting the hay. For whatever reason, it was down from 80 to 30mbps, so I went to bed in a bad mood. But this morning I was getting 70mbps, so... I'll try not to let the speed tests drive me crazy. As long as I can get away from the frequent buffering of streaming content, I'll be happy.
Many thanks, KLit75, for your input on this. I really appreciate you takin' the time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a problem. If you're experiencing buffering it might be time to consider some advanced settings and unfortunately I'm not the one to talk to. I don't typically have buffering issues but it appears I'm more of the exception there.
There was actually a good thread very recently (last few days) I think it was title adjusting zero cache? Anyway it turns out lots of people set it to zero and that's not good for aftv. Read the entire thread then you might want to go to the org for more specifics.
I think I don't have buffering because I typically don't stream hd movie sources, especially over WiFi. Most of my online sources are tv shows from genesis. The others I almost alwaysuse local files.
KLit75 said:
There was actually a good thread very recently (last few days) I think it was title adjusting zero cache? Anyway it turns out lots of people set it to zero and that's not good for aftv. Read the entire thread then you might want to go to the org for more specifics..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd very much like to read that thread, as I did the Zero Cache routine and it seemed to help for a little while, but then not so much. Was it in this forum, cuz I don't see anything pertaining to zero cache in the title since the start of the new year?
Raymondo17 said:
I'd very much like to read that thread, as I did the Zero Cache routine and it seemed to help for a little while, but then not so much. Was it in this forum, cuz I don't see anything pertaining to zero cache in the title since the start of the new year?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's this one. But like I said you might want to read then check related topics at the org. I don't pretend to know much about it but it seems there's not one catch all number to set. It's specific to your network.
In maybe a related topic, adbFire 1.16 was just released and I'm not certain but think the dev*made it simpler to change this/modify cache. If it's what I think it is it MIGHT make it a whole lot easier to play around/test different settings. But as always, do your research. I'm trying to help but it's not something I have experience with. I've been around long enough to understand this MAY be something that'd benefit you.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/fire-tv/help/adjusting-zero-cache-t3016416
KLit75 said:
It's this one. But like I said you might want to read then check related topics at the org.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/fire-tv/help/adjusting-zero-cache-t3016416
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that thread is exactly what I needed. And double-wow, somehow I was oblivious to this site's AFTV Help & Troubleshooting area, which is where most of my posts should have been placed in the first place, and definitely where a lot of my future reading will take place. Thanks for shoving me in the right direction, and my apologies to all for not posting in a more appropriate location.
KLit75 said:
In maybe a related topic, adbFire 1.16 was just released and I'm not certain but think the dev*made it simpler to change this/modify cache. If it's what I think it is it MIGHT make it a whole lot easier to play around/test different settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I checked out adbFire 1.16 last night. I was having trouble getting the main window on 1.15 to display at all, so I was using 1.14, which was a little sketchy as well. (I chalk it up to an aging Mac.) But 1.16 seems to be much improved.
Raymondo17 said:
Wow, that thread is exactly what I needed. And double-wow, somehow I was oblivious to this site's AFTV Help & Troubleshooting area, which is where most of my posts should have been placed in the first place, and definitely where a lot of my future reading will take place. Thanks for shoving me in the right direction, and my apologies to all for not posting in a more appropriate location.
Yes, I checked out adbFire 1.16 last night. I was having trouble getting the main window on 1.15 to display at all, so I was using 1.14, which was a little sketchy as well. (I chalk it up to an aging Mac.) But 1.16 seems to be much improved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm a Mac user myself. Is Mac on WiFi? If so I found toggling from 2ghz to 5 helps with your adbfire problem. Btw--my Mac is white unibody 2010. But I quadrupled the ram from 2 to 8gb and this machine runs Yosemite better than some newer macs I've seen (faster anyway) About an 80 dollar investment paid off big time! Otherwise I would've been looking at at least a grand to buy a new one. Just something to consider and don't go by what apple says! According to them my Mac only supports 4 GB but testers have run 16 GB with great results. Mine has been running 8 for the better part of a year. If you go that route I'd reccomend a clean install from USB to really see the results.
KLit75 said:
I'm a Mac user myself. Is Mac on WiFi? If so I found toggling from 2ghz to 5 helps with your adbfire problem. Btw--my Mac is white unibody 2010. But I quadrupled the ram from 2 to 8gb and this machine runs Yosemite better than some newer macs I've seen (faster anyway) .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My mac is actually hardwired to the router. I'm realizing this beast is probably about a decade old now! I never used to get more than three years out of a computer. I pretty much maxed out the RAM when I bought it, so I think it's actually time for a new computer. But I will also say that I've got one of the brand new, black trashcan-looking Power Macs at work, and it's a dog. Crashes all the freakin' time. I wish I was still using my silver tower, so new isn't always better.