Source Code - Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II

Anyone know the status of Samsung releasing the Source Code? I thought they were going to start releasing it in a timely manner. My AOKP patiently awaits.

kronium said:
Anyone know the status of Samsung releasing the Source Code? I thought they were going to start releasing it in a timely manner. My AOKP patiently awaits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel is all they'll probably release anytime soon... and that's only on official releases. Let's hope MA5 goes OTA so we can get a 4.1.2 source.

garwynn said:
Kernel is all they'll probably release anytime soon... and that's only on official releases. Let's hope MA5 goes OTA so we can get a 4.1.2 source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here here [raises glass]

Related

Anyone interested in Desire Gingerbread Test Rom?

I think it's a more suitable gingerbread rom with sense for HD2.
PB99IMG_Bravo_Gingerbread_HTCCN_CHS_3.12.1400.1_Ra dio_32.56.00.32U_5.17.05.23_test_189900.zip
http://u.115.com/file/cliyvczb
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=1TNEXW65
The glitches can be Fixed with this!!
saintlyjinn said:
I think it's a more suitable gingerbread rom with sense for HD2.
PB99IMG_Bravo_Gingerbread_HTCCN_CHS_3.12.1400.1_Ra dio_32.56.00.32U_5.17.05.23_test_189900.zip
http://u.115.com/file/cliyvczb
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=1TNEXW65
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
never mind this looks to be already posted in the desire forum
new drivers for adreno200 anyone? ginger without stripes anyone? gogogogogogogo
This is [email protected] awesome, Looks like we are gunna have a glitch free/more stable GB sense port soon
[EDIT] Can you link me to where its posted in desire section, want to see if there is any info on rom, what HTC removed to fit it on desire etc.
Screemi said:
new drivers for adreno200 anyone? ginger without stripes anyone? gogogogogogogo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we will need the new kernel source code to fix the adreno drivers. the newer libs should not fix the glitçhes.
Guys, see upload date.... 2011-05-18 23:34:11
Ultimaex said:
we will need the new kernel source code to fix the adreno drivers. the newer libs should not fix the glitçhes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah kernel is needed for gfx glitches but should soon follow after official release. Plus the base rom itself would be good for porting, especially for our EU HD2's
Avatarko said:
Guys, see upload date.... 2011-05-18 23:34:11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wondered why I hadn't seen anything new based of a new rom in Desire section.
sorry, my bad. i thought the sources are included but it's just a rom.
still hoping for a fast release of the desire rom and kernel sources.
Screemi said:
sorry, my bad. i thought the sources are included but it's just a rom.
still hoping for a fast release of the desire rom and kernel sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but more to the point that this rom is a older leaked rom not a recent test rom.
I am wondering why htc said that it won't release it, while they began developing gb sense since May.
agdroubi said:
I am wondering why htc said that it won't release it, while they began developing gb sense since May.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They said they weren't and then they said the reason why they weren't is because of the space needed. So they said they will make a release but they're just going to have to delete a few things.
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App
Souce code for desire Z is released, who knows things might change soon
I really hope these new rom releases bring on a few changes for our phone!
tobiascrystal said:
I really hope these new rom releases bring on a few changes for our phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant really see how it could bring any changes per-say apart from fixes for glitches etc but that would be more of the kernel source not the rom afaik.
Then again the desire ports are quite decent, especially the skink version.

[Q] [Honest curiosity] About updates and AOSP

If there's already source for 4.0.3 why don't devs (whom i'll always not thanks enough for their work) makes an update? Only Google can make an incremental update and we need a full AOSP rom ?
? There are 4.0.3 roms
all the main roms i see in the dev section are 4.0.3
Sorry if i wasn't clear enough.
I mean: i'm on stock 4.0.1 and i don't want to wipe now. Isn't there a way to make an incremental update 4.0.3 instead of flashing an entire rom?
Also as a Nexus device, wasn't one of the benefits that Google would put out the updates very quickly?
They have 4.0.3 just sitting there, is there any reason why they're not putting it out?
The 4.0.3 roms are based off from the uncompiled 4.0.3 source that google releases to the public, which developers can compile and test their apps on.
As for your 4.0.1, is your device a yakju, or jakjuux? Check with the GN checker app on the market. If its jakjuux, it wont be updated until samsung says so, meanwhile if you are running jakju, you should be able to go to 4.0.2, which has been released as an OTA through google. Hope this helps.
Sent from my MZ604 using xda premium
F0l3ert said:
The 4.0.3 roms are based off from the uncompiled 4.0.3 source that google releases to the public, which developers can compile and test their apps on.
As for your 4.0.1, is your device a yakju, or jakjuux? Check with the GN checker app on the market. If its jakjuux, it wont be updated until samsung says so, meanwhile if you are running jakju, you should be able to go to 4.0.2, which has been released as an OTA through google. Hope this helps.
Sent from my MZ604 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm yakju bu you didn't get my point or neither i'm not explaining what it could be only my imagination. BUT
If the source code it's released why it can't be a 6/10/20 mb packet that can upgrade my system like a FOTA update can do ?
Because 4.0.3 has some bugs that needs to be fixed. The 4.0.3 OTA was released for Nexus S then pulled because of the bugs it was having.
You think if it was ready, they'd release it. Give it time, people are so ungrateful when 95% of the Android Community are still on Android 2.3.X and below.
If you want it so badly, flash a custom ROM with 4.0.3 on it. If you don't want to, then you can't really complain.
zephiK said:
If you want it so badly, flash a custom ROM with 4.0.3 on it. If you don't want to, then you can't really complain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never complained and you didn't answered my question
zephiK said:
Because 4.0.3 has some bugs that needs to be fixed. The 4.0.3 OTA was released for Nexus S then pulled because of the bugs it was having.
You think if it was ready, they'd release it. Give it time, people are so ungrateful when 95% of the Android Community are still on Android 2.3.X and below.
If you want it so badly, flash a custom ROM with 4.0.3 on it. If you don't want to, then you can't really complain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really, there's a source released for the GNex from Google.
Sugar0, I will try compiling that stock source and tell you how it goes.
Arrio said:
Not really, there's a source released for the GNex from Google.
Sugar0, I will try compiling that stock source and tell you how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't need to! It's plenty of stock untouched AOSP roms and modified.
What i'm asking is:
is there an unofficial small update that will bring 4.0.3 to my GN that i can flash in recovery ? Not the full rom!
sugar0 said:
You don't need to! It's plenty of stock untouched AOSP roms and modified.
What i'm asking is:
is there an unofficial small update that will bring 4.0.3 to my GN that i can flash in recovery ? Not the full rom!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh then no.. not at the moment.
You could always just compile it yourself with "make otapackage", that will give you exactly what you're asking for.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
magn2o said:
You could always just compile it yourself with "make otapackage", that will give you exactly what you're asking for.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Finally an on-topic answer! Why aren't those updates around ? Do i miss something ?
No, you didn't "miss" anything. It's just that most people who are going to take the time to setup a build environment are doing so to tinker with the source -- not just build a vanilla package. Either way, its not terribly difficult to setup and build -- especially with all the guides floating around XDA.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
magn2o said:
You could always just compile it yourself with "make otapackage", that will give you exactly what you're asking for.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not strictly true. The 'OTA' package you make when compiling the ROM from source is still a complete ROM as opposed to a small OTA update
It won't require a system wipe and will apply just like an OTA, which is what (I'm assuming) the OP wanted.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
magn2o said:
It won't require a system wipe and will apply just like an OTA, which is what (I'm assuming) the OP wanted.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep! like nigthly build of Cyanogenmod. It doesen't matter if its 6mb or 120mb. So aren't there those updates around ? I can't understand why they don't make such updates

what is kang

i keep hearing about these kang roms, what exactly does it mean
Kang → The process of creating a code based of someone else's code or reapplying code that someone else created into your own code (e.g. git cherry-pick)
ahha! so that would be cyanogen roms right now are kanged. since there is no officail version yet. if i understand u correctly
Yes... that is it.
Skickat från min ASUS Eee Pad TF101
an animal usually found in australia
tomdroid3 said:
ahha! so that would be cyanogen roms right now are kanged. since there is no officail version yet. if i understand u correctly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
usually refers to android open kang project
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1402350
As a follow up question, kanging with credit is accepted but without it nit?
blackt5 said:
As a follow up question, kanging with credit is accepted but without it nit?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
10 chars
tomdroid3 said:
ahha! so that would be cyanogen roms right now are kanged. since there is no officail version yet. if i understand u correctly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what is the difference between these Kang versions of CM9 and the non-stable releases of CM?
kpucci said:
So what is the difference between these Kang versions of CM9 and the non-stable releases of CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kang CM9 - official CM9 with someone else's tweaks
non-stable CM9 (nightly) - done CM team only
King Kang was King Kongs brother.
Kang copied everything Kong did.
Which of the CM9's does anybody recommend?
Doritos Bandito said:
Which of the CM9's does anybody recommend?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ones that say AOKP or Liquid.
Zepius said:
kang CM9 - official CM9 with someone else's tweaks
non-stable CM9 (nightly) - done CM team only
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks...but they are both based on the nightlies correct?
kpucci said:
Thanks...but they are both based on the nightlies correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not necessarily.
They share the same source code (edit: more accurately code source), that's it. You can build a ROM from source if you wanted to, and it would be a "kang". Officially known now as "unofficial".
kpucci said:
Thanks...but they are both based on the nightlies correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the CM9 official ones yes
the kangs usually are, but might not be 100% current to the official ones.
We are kangs of our parents. Based on the same source code but with cherry picks.
Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.
Archpope said:
Don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who or what is kodos?
Freddy1X said:
Who or what is kodos?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahahaha

[ROM] Glitter 4.2.2 JDQ39E Linaro 4.7.3 Toolchain

This is just an extremely clean build based off of the Latest AOSP release. It's compiled with linaro. The only real differences from stock AOSP are that I added the embedded superuser. I figure that Android is such a good base to build other things off so of why not leave it be.
http://www.mediafire.com/?d5zo8s1g6ltm2bd
ill give it a run i been looking for a clean rooted stock with the superuser in the settings lol oddly enough no joke thankx
Do you think, I can install it on Maguro?
freezer2000 said:
Do you think, I can install it on Maguro?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Unless you don't mind not having data or voice/sms. Recovery normally fails on roms cross device on purpose.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
tiny4579 said:
No. Unless you don't mind not having data or voice/sms. Recovery normally fails on roms cross device on purpose.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP can you in that case do a maguro build too... I can be the tester
This is the simplest ROM op I've ever seen xD
nitsua98 said:
This is the simplest ROM op I've ever seen xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BAHAHAHA, yeah I usually flash CM or AOKP for a week and then say screw it I just want to go back to AOSP. Once I get back to my computer this week it'll probably be rebased on Master. It's not a complicated thing. Simply AOSP builds with LatinIMEGoogle being the only difference. ThinkFree is in there too I believe.
freezer2000 said:
OP can you in that case do a maguro build too... I can be the tester
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have a GSM so I'm a little scurred about building for something that I can't test out myself. Sometime this week I'll have a ROM that's built off of the Master repo and I'll get the Maguro Proprietaries and build that if you'd like.
I may just build once and provide a flashable to add the CDMA or GSM Proprietary files depending on what the person needs.
doobie711 said:
BAHAHAHA, yeah I usually flash CM or AOKP for a week and then say screw it I just want to go back to AOSP. Once I get back to my computer this week it'll probably be rebased on Master. It's not a complicated thing. Simply AOSP builds with LatinIMEGoogle being the only difference. ThinkFree is in there too I believe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So this is like baldwinguy's shiny rom but built with linaro?

[Q] Andoird L

Android L is out, how long will it take until we'll have some custom Roms with Android L?
Flatric said:
Android L is out, how long will it take until we'll have some custom Roms with Android L?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
afaik it's not merged into aosp yet.
i think it'll be released together with the new devices
Aronuser said:
afaik it's not merged into aosp yet.
i think it'll be released together with the new devices
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does afaik mean? Sry I'm German
Flatric said:
What does afaik mean? Sry I'm German
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as far as I know
We need to wait for the official Android L on our devices, if there will be one. Most probably not. The closer we can go is a ROM, but it's not worth it.
RoyaLKurTx3 said:
as far as I know
We need to wait for the official Android L on our devices, if there will be one. Most probably not. The closer we can go is a ROM, but it's not worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why we need the official one for our device to build a custom Rom?
Flatric said:
Why we need the official one for our device to build a custom Rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we don't
We need Google to publish (merge) their source code (AOSP, base of the ROM, human language for the ROM's computer code) to be able to easily modify it to suit our device's needs (drivers etc.)
xdevilium said:
We need Google to publish (merge) their source code (AOSP, base of the ROM, human language for the ROM's computer code) to be able to easily modify it to suit our device's needs (drivers etc.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks now I understood
I'm also really curious how long it could take after the release of the AOSP code, that's why I bump this thread now.
Aronuser said:
I'm also really curious how long it could take after the release of the AOSP code, that's why I bump this thread now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1 to 4 weeks aprox. for first nightly. Cyanogen is very fast when have the source code in his hands.

Categories

Resources