www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT5XOWU8u-o
This is awesome. The PA guys released it just recently and it would be awesome on our Defy
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
swapnil360 said:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gT5XOWU8u-o
This is awesome. The PA guys released it just recently and it would be awesome on our Defy
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's neat. Probably really hard to port since it relies on the closed source PAPreferences.apk and some of the open source PA modifications.
PIE is on PA 2.99 based on JB 10.1. As far as I know, our 10.1 isn't ready for daily use just yet (that might change with all the changes I saw on Quarx's github a while ago ). When it is, I plan on getting back to PA. I'm also willing to help anyone who'd like to try kanging it all together in the mean time.
In the mean time I'm working an ICS rom. Gonna include ICS PA, Salad Bar, and ICS Blur from the Atrix HD. Didn't plan on going full Blur, but some Blur services are required to get Smart Actions fully working (everything works except for location based triggers, requires Blur services framework). Figured if I was gonna have to use some Blue, might as well use it all .
Still have a ways to go, but its progressing.
it does not rely on paprefs. in fact nothing we ever did does. paprefs writes and reads name=value pairs to a textfile, nothing more. you dont need the app for hybrid engine or pie. having said that, pie is still under heavy development. we always build first and release later, we never release unfinished source, much like google does with the aosp.
molesarecoming said:
it does not rely on paprefs. in fact nothing we ever did does. paprefs writes and reads name=value pairs to a textfile, nothing more. you dont need the app for hybrid engine or pie. having said that, pie is still under heavy development. we always build first and release later, we never release unfinished source, much like google does with the aosp.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assumed PAPrefs was a requirement for PIE since I've seen it bundled with framework-res.apk and systemui.apk for other devices to try it out. Since that's not the case, cool beans. Sorry about the misinformation.
/Yep, I assumed. We all know what that makes me
@molesarecoming: I wonder how you find this post to answer. xD I still can't forget the help you and Darkenesys provided when I first started to port the ICS PA for Defy.
About the Pie, its one of the coolest thing happened to Android. You guyz are getting bigger and bigger, even the big OEMs will try to copy you soon so get ready to be more famous.
@Skeevy: good luck mate.
Cmx has Pie too xD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXCBRmheXc4
squadzone said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXCBRmheXc4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that a Defy in that video?
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
swapnil360 said:
Is that a Defy in that video?
Sent from my MB526 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it isn't a Defy.
AW: [REQ] Paranoid Android PIE port for Defy
Pls delete
MB525 red lense
Related
Every rom I see by that team is always a alpha version I have yet to see a fully completed rom by that team.
Sent from the official iPhone killer
Yes they do? How about cm 7?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
aimbdd said:
Yes they do? How about cm 7?
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
or CM6, CM5 etc...
A better question would be is a rom ever complete? There will always be bugs that are found that do need to be fixed just like Android in general it's never really "done" there are always updates to it that fix things.
What gingerbread rom do they have for our phone. Looking to try them out.
Sent from the official iPhone killer
blackdragon79 said:
What gingerbread rom do they have for our phone. Looking to try them out.
Sent from the official iPhone killer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you do realize that our phone is CDMA, Proprietary code is not available for some of the hardware which greatly increases the time it takes to develop our phones ports.
If you like the idea of a Complete CyanogenMod you should grab an international GSM phone preferably a stock AOSP device. You will have a "complete" rom alot faster than you ever will with a sprint device.
The OG epic only became officially supported not long ago.
blackdragon79 said:
What gingerbread rom do they have for our phone. Looking to try them out.
Sent from the official iPhone killer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no "official" GB rom from CM for this phone. Rootzwiki has an "unofficial" CM7.1/2 that's no longer supported however. We are getting "official" CM9 and the Alpha 1 is in the Dev section.
Lol wut? Is this your first android device?
nickwn88 said:
Lol wut? Is this your first android device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
cidica said:
There is no "official" GB rom from CM for this phone. Rootzwiki has an "unofficial" CM7.1/2 that's no longer supported however. We are getting "official" CM9 and the Alpha 1 is in the Dev section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was told that the Alpha 1 wasn't official.?
There are at least 3 or 4 Cyanogenmod attempts for our phone, isn't that a set team that always develops or can anyone attempt a Cyanogenmod? Don't understand how there can be multiple Cyanogenmod ROMs for our phone?
darklavalizard said:
There are at least 3 or 4 Cyanogenmod attempts for our phone, isn't that a set team that always develops or can anyone attempt a Cyanogenmod? Don't understand how there can be multiple Cyanogenmod ROMs for our phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you mean to say there are multiple AOSP-based (original ICS w/o Touchwiz) ROMs for our phone.
Sbrissen and Darchstar are currently working on CM9 for our phone.
T.C.P. has released AOKP, Gummy, and Codename Android for our phone.
darklavalizard said:
There are at least 3 or 4 Cyanogenmod attempts for our phone, isn't that a set team that always develops or can anyone attempt a Cyanogenmod? Don't understand how there can be multiple Cyanogenmod ROMs for our phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone is free to take the CM code and build their own ROM. That's the beauty of open source. All they ask is that such derivative builds are labeled as kangs or otherwise make note that they are using CM9's codebase.
Anyone can become a member of CM if they do good work such as committing bug fixes to the project and take a role in supporting CM on a particular device
Darchstar's build should be considered the "official" CM9 build for our phone. He's part of the CM team. However, until he or others are able to build a working kernel from source for the E4GT and not use Samsung's we won't have a truly CM9 build.
blackdragon79 said:
Every rom I see by that team is always a alpha version I have yet to see a fully completed rom by that team.
Sent from the official iPhone killer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No rom is complete without official ice release.. they don't even have source for our phones yet for ics. Therefore it cannot be completed.. plus kudos to the person who said it will never be complete based off of bugs plus there are always ways to improve a rom regardless; of how "complete" it is.. would you want a dev to make a rom then never update it? They can't make it official until everything is working..
Sent from my SPH-D710 using XDA
Nothing is ever finished in android
Notice the carriers always pushing fixes. ICS will probably be updated within a month after official drops.
Just the nature of the beast.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
Android has become more and more complex to develop for (both in terms of skill and computing power), and the true developers (not including people who just modify existing roms) have become more spread out across devices.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk
hey guys, the last months i've seen almost 4 topics about developing (such as Maroc&Razor, Motafoca, Androhacker etc...) why doesn't anyone of those combine and form 1 single team. I think it will be much better than 4 seperate teams.
And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.
raolemo said:
And 4 different ROMS are better than 1. Everyone is working with someone else at the moment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed. if people having options they will try rather then using one......
I agree with OP.. unity is the strength here.. they would hv developed it faster if they worked together.. although there can be major clashes over the the concepts.. as some strongly support some issue some don't at all!
But the point is for the sake of the dev.. they might consider sharing what they hv achieved so far.. like so far the one by razor083 is very much working.. but with lot of bugs.. if they try they can make it work! instead they r building it again separately! They should only do dat if there is nothing to be done on this port by razor083!! in dat case they should proceed from source again! but atlst they should take a look at it!!
Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Chucrute said:
Madteam finally maked a cyanogenmod from source
Its working
http://madteam.co/forum/development-79/cyanogenmod-7-for-samsung-galaxy-y/
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really from source?
he said
This is a port of CyanogenMod 7.2.0-RC0, a community-based custom Android ROM based Gingerbread 2.3.7, for the Samsung Galaxy Y phone. The current development status inicial - most hardware is not working correctly !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now im confused
nope.. it is from the source.. He also said "Its from source
I built it"..
No 3G, no Wifi, and no audio. Now thats not something I would flash. Waiting for a stable bug free version with crossed fingers. xP
OP is right: We (developers/themers/porters) should work together to make a fully working cm7 and cm9. Not all the bad roms which all get discontinued.... PM me if you want me to work with you!
Sent from Samsung Galaxy s III baby
I live in Singapore and got the Captivate Glide with me. I am looking for a super fast, super stable, least bug free ROM. I need tethering to work, keyboard backlight would be nice and the camera to be stellar.
I need your advice. Should I be going for:
I927UCLG9 - "Official" Leak - 4.0.4 ICS
Cyanogenmod 9.1
or anything else?
dude the cyanogenmod 9.1 is for the captivate not the captivate glide.
there is no official support for CM on the glide,
i know that dman working on an "unofficial" CM9/10 port.
taiber2000 said:
dude the cyanogenmod 9.1 is for the captivate not the captivate glide.
there is no official support for CM on the glide,
i know that dman working on an "unofficial" CM9/10 port.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha i got a little confused there to
Sent from my SGH-I927 using xda premium
carpediem said:
I live in Singapore and got the Captivate Glide with me. I am looking for a super fast, super stable, least bug free ROM. I need tethering to work, keyboard backlight would be nice and the camera to be stellar.
I need your advice. Should I be going for:
I927UCLG9 - "Official" Leak - 4.0.4 ICS
Cyanogenmod 9.1
or anything else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want a bootloop or hard brick, go for the latter
There's a keyboard light fix in these forums. NardROM has it implemented. Tethering app in NardROM. Camera apps available from Market. Camera ICS is nice.
Aquethys said:
If you want a bootloop or hard brick, go for the latter
There's a keyboard light fix in these forums. NardROM has it implemented. Tethering app in NardROM. Camera apps available from Market. Camera ICS is nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure to get Camera ICS + though it has more features
Sent from my SGH-I927 using xda premium
then again the same camera is on Stock Vanilla ICS...lol so it's better to save $$ and wait for AOSP
need some moderating in these forums... this post dont belong here...
reinbeau has been directed
@OP:
Why in the world would you put CyanogenMod in the poll if we've already told you it's unavailable atm? Wow. Read more, please.
Thread closed
Yes, much more research, reading, and understanding is necessary here. Don't flash anything unless you completely understand what you are doing.
Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
World be awesome
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Oh f**k yes!!! but I'm pretty sure the device maintainers is arco
-sent from my awesome phone-
Hell yeah
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
doesn't have galaxy s plus in the list......
but i also have galaxy w,W cm rom can port to s plus?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
hell yeah finally we got official support from cyanogenmod! :good:
Hats off to Sir Arco and all other developers. It's due to them that we have grabbed some attention !!!
Galaxy W I8150 + DXLM2 + CM9 Beta 3
It's the best news for W and S+ users! Of course CM10.1 can be ported to S+. I am supporting arco for this, Galaxy W improves further than before!!!
Great news and i'm happy that the Galaxy W is still getting supported even if it has been long forgotten by Samsung.
this is very suprising news , only can think arco as the maintainers
at last:laugh:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it is a lie?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master
Hope it will be soon, but it's enough to have W with 3.x.x kernel and CM10 for now. When Samsung forgot the W, it's good to see arco and CM Team are working on this device. Keep working on that guys.
petafly said:
Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read the whole thread, and not. a. single. post ever mentioned the source of the list.
So, since there is no official news release from the Cyanogenmod team, I'd say that this is hearsay...
Yes, no trustable source. I'm asking myself, why would someone add our phone to the list of the new Cyanogenmod and imply a change of policy of CM?
Thanx arco for clearing things up.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
hotheabilly said:
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ye I'll see if I can do a build of CM10 with 3.x kernel soon. Things are a bit overwhelming at the moment, with 3 Android versions to work on, so it's hard to find enough time to spend on them. I'm beginning to feel that Google should slow down their release cycle a bit. As it is now, there's barely enough time for us devs to get a version stable, before they release a new Android version and we'll have to start all over again.
So it seems all we have to do is to wait for now
Posted in the wrong thread
why dont u people try to build an AOSP rom instead ofa CM....coz probably cm is sumthing that is modifications made to AOSP....and even the touchwiz ui is modified AOSP so if we can have a AOSP build itll probably be easier for us to build these roms..
...if sum one is ready to help me learn about building roms from source ill sure try making CM's and AOKP and paranoid and what not
is better but its based on AOSP.....its like imagine AOSP as a stock rom and CM as a custom rom...wait why imagine..its actually like that....so the basic idea is to improve performance...where CM show up...but whats the base CM uses??...its AOSP....so if we have a perfect AOSP which is obv possible...coz Samsung wouldn't be able to build TouchWiz withouta base...for obv reasons...so why not try building an AOSP first and then continuing with CM
do u even know whatcha sayin?
tl;dr
Here's some math:
No sources = no base
No base = no sources
No sources = no cm
No cm = no aosp
So unless you try to find a way to make those proprietary sources available then I'd suggest doing some research.
Also even if you tried you'll fail, we have the best devs for sgy working hard for that goal and we're honestly not making good progress. Well except for percy and his cm9 and psycho's cm7 but still a long way from "stable as stock".
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
prototype-U said:
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Naman...we haven't tried making AOSP yet so we cant just confirm this and it cant be that it was made for nexus only coz its an open source project so they must have probably kept in mind that many dev's will try to have it on different devices ..... the Gingerbread that our SGY uses is nothing but a custom rom of the aosp which we call as stock....
for obv reasons...samsung would not have made their own android os right...they have used google sources....the point is...the time dev's have spent on making CM if would have been focused on AOSP we might just have a build close enough to psycho's work!
and what ive learned or i might be wrong in this that psycho used aosp's sources for the fixes....Maybe wrong about this...i just read it somewhere here!.....and as our device has the largest community of awesome dev's why not we try the AOSP thing out??
we cant just conclude without trying...can we??......some months back people were like we wont have a CM....we have a working CM7 and CM9 which are working pretty fine except for the driver bugs....same way,we might just end up having an AOSP...
another hope to Young GT-S6310. need a great developers to make it true
prototype-U said:
My information might not be correct. A friend of mine told me this.
See cm is made by aftermarket developers keeping in mind that it can support lot of different phones.
On the other hand aosp was made for nexus phones so they don't give a damn that it works on other phones or not. They are just selfish lol.
So building pure aosp is tougher compared to cm. Cm has modifications on aosp to support different phones.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you should see this. www.cyanogenmod.org/about
And also about android opensource project. Google gives aosp source to all manufacturers as part of aosp allience/programme which they further modify. And first phone running android was not nexus to say that they don't give damn about other devices. And the number of devices running CM is still very low.
Like I said, a friend told me about it.
Sent from my HTC Desire X using xda app-developers app
If we get a set of experienced Devs who want to help out we might get aosp
Also if stock is like a custom aosp
That means our phone must support AOSP!!
Only need some experience Devs :sly:
As i said its all about aosp....just need sum1 to teach me these sources and setup stuff....i would like to start working on it as soon as possible!
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Our devs are already experienced :sly:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Reynaldi said:
Our devs are already experienced :sly:
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he is trying to tell we need dev's who have experiance compiling source roms not dev's who are great with adding tweaks and theming the our samsung stock rom's.....source compiling is far different from the rom i made or many of the roms available in our threads....
SSSidGGG said:
he is trying to tell we need dev's who have experiance compiling source roms not dev's who are great with adding tweaks and theming the our samsung stock rom's.....source compiling is far different from the rom i made or many of the roms available in our threads....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are very less people or maybe no one who has source development experience.
prototype-U said:
There are very less people or maybe no one who has source development experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know...thats the reason ive been looking around google for sumthing that could get me some help .........its hard i guess ill have to take percy's help :?
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Reynaldi said:
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Veru funny dude! ( --..-- )
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Reynaldi said:
How about making thread "all devs come here please help us to compile cm for our device" in another device board? Lol jk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really bro?._.
Sent from my SGY using XDA
I am new here.......
Don't be rude and hit thanks
Device : Samsung Galaxy Y
ROM : Hyperion 8 pre gm alsa build 0.2
KERNEL : Savie's
I say start saving money for a new phone.
prototype-U said:
I say start saving money for a new phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry naman but why buy a new phone? we have lots of roms and kernels. also we can oc the device to 1.25ghz and have a gpu. this is the best phone for a developer. even if it ends up bricking or lost, no regrets since a low cost phone. lets just finish what we started. perseverance is the key man.
sorry but i am not flaming you, i am a big fan of yours and i love the kernel
SaketJoshi said:
sorry naman but why buy a new phone? we have lots of roms and kernels. also we can oc the device to 1.25ghz and have a gpu. this is the best phone for a developer. even if it ends up bricking or lost, no regrets since a low cost phone. lets just finish what we started. perseverance is the key man.
sorry but i am not flaming you, i am a big fan of yours and i love the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man.. they are just stock based roms.. everyone is upgrading these days, android 4.3 has been released and you are still on 2.3.6. Which makes you guys really outdated..
Kernel? yeah there are huge number of kernels here but if you notice that most of em have same features See other phones like nexus 4. They have whats called "real" kernel development.
Pico which is 1k more expensive is 100 times better than this phone and you also know it. Why not buy that? I sold my Y for 3.5k and another 3k can buy you a arm7 phone. Which wont get outdated for another year atleast..