Related
Ever since i flashed francos kernel for the first time i failed to see any difference whatsoever in batterylife or performance. 4 versions of franco kernel later and still no change. Even bought his app and tried undervolting. I accidentaly uv'd by 100 in the 700 category and none of the side effects were happening so i tried undervolting all by 200 and even setting on boot. Nothing happened. I then flashed jame bond kernel and nothing happened. When i tried flashing glados kernel it just froze on boot. I experimented with all of them for at least a day and except glados which didn't work they all showed no difference than stock regarding battery life or performance. What could be the cause of this?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Kernels don't have the profound effect you might think on this phone. Not nearly as much as devices I have had in the past.
I'm aware of that, but still. No difference whatsoever? Even when i intentionally try and break it by undervolting by 200?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
What did you undervolt by 200? Some speed steps can get away with that.
What ROM are you using?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
adrynalyne said:
Kernels don't have the profound effect you might think on this phone. Not nearly as much as devices I have had in the past.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adrynalyne! Its good to see you here!
Yeah, on the Fascinate, Kernels had much more of a profound effect. I can't say the same for this phone. But the OP said that he purposely tried to Bork his phone to see if it worked and it didn't even touch it. That's really strange. I can purposely try to Bork mine and do a pretty damn good job of it.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Some kernels had broken UV interfaces that wouldn't undervolt the kernel and would allow you to undervolt by absurd amounts. (though it wasn't actually doing anything)
joshnichols189 said:
Some kernels had broken UV interfaces that wouldn't undervolt the kernel and would allow you to undervolt by absurd amounts. (though it wasn't actually doing anything)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, are all the most popular kernels broken? Franco, glados, jame bond? I'm more inclined to think the problem is localized (either me or my phone).
And i'm running aokp 20, btw. Had 19 and milestone2 before those, which were all installed after full wipes (before anyone suggests that).
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Your not the only one with this problem as I too have seen no change in battery performance on my gnex. I'm also using aokp 20 and Franco's (14.4). What I don't get however is that my buddy seems to see significant improvement in his phone while running the same rom/kernel combo
I've had some friends do some tests for me and run stock kernels for a while.
The differences in performance and battery life were menial between custom and stock.
What about all those people that claim seeing improved battery life? Not to mention those impresive screenshots of battery stats that show numbers i have yet to even come close to.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
naturally. also, data calls are a huge battery drainer, even with excellent reception, when actually using the phone. the same with wifi.
to give the op an example, this last night i forgot wifi on. connected to my home network. the phone slept well (something woke it up in the middle but for a very short period of time, probably gmail), and i only lost 3%. i normally loose 1% in 7hrs approx., so it wasnt so bad.
on the other hand, if screenOn is true, it will obviously drain faster..
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 on that.
Btw adryn, what kernel/rom do you use in your gnex?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Tried a lot of combinations, but at the time of writing the original post i had been using aokp 20 with franco 14.4 for a while. I am currently trying aokp20 with trinity 384mhz gpu.
Also i lost about 2%/hour with franco in standby. I had mobile data connected and autosync only for google account + yahoo mail, all set to sync each hour.
Waiting on trinity now. Curious if i notice any difference besides the lack of franco's blueish tint.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This.
However, the GPU overclock is noticeable on games like Shadow and GTA.
yondercomesthetrain said:
+1 on that.
Btw adryn, what kernel/rom do you use in your gnex?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My own or stock. I experiment a lot. Currently I am running a custom with a tweaked deadline scheduler, and a slightly different oc method for gpu and cpu than everyone is using to 1.35ghz. Stock voltages, tweaked ramdisk for filesystem mounts. Stock sleep profile of 350/700 on Interactive. Not using Setcpu to overclock at all. I set the power profile in fw-res to include the extra speed step.
So far so good, but its too early to tell. I went to bed and work up 9 hours off battery with 99% remaining. So its definitely deep sleeping fine I won't know for a couple days on whether it sucks battery dry or not.
ericc191 said:
This.
However, the GPU overclock is noticeable on games like Shadow and GTA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't play a lot of games but 307mhz to 384, nets me 3fps in Nenamark2. Not exactly mind blowing.
adrynalyne said:
Many of those screenshots are sleep time.
Also, never underestimate the power of placebo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly. I used to go crazy doing this and that, disabling this and that to try to get 20+ hours that people were getting on stock battery. Then I came to realize that the screenshots are probably mostly sleep time. Me being a very social person (text, IM, Facebook, and Tweet a lot) there is no way I was ever gonna get anywhere near 20 hours on stock. So I bought a couple of spare batteries, turned stuff back on, turn the screen back on brightly and enjoyed the phone and its great screen without worrying about battery life
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Ill be as honest as I can. I just had two nexus and installed two different roms and and two different kernels....I believe they don't do anything as well..And I thinks its placebo effect when people are saying there battery's are better or the screen is smoother....I see not much of a difference even in stock...yes the benchmark may go up but that's means nothing really....
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA App
I've had my Galaxy S3 from T-Mobile now for about a week. The phone seems to run perfectly fine. However when I attempt to run Quadrant for example my friends are averaging anywhere from 4900 - 5300 for their stock T-Mobile S3. My same phone, stock, everything closed/killed from task manager, only manages to score 3100 - 3600.
When I check system information in Quadrant sometimes it says my current clock speed is 912Mhz, 1134Mhz etc.. Rarely do I see it at the full 1512Mhz..
Power saving mode is definitely turned off. Even after doing a factory reset and running quadrant on a fresh install it still scores the same. Beginning to get frustrated this phone isn't living up to the hype.
Ideas anyone? Thanks.
I did a battery pull, killed all my apps, cleared my memory, waited a few seconds, ran Quadrant again and still can only manage to score 3100.
No offence but who cares about benchmarks...... the phones soooo smooth and awsome
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda premium
Don't have mine yet but I have seen someone have the same problem on here and what was wrong with theirs was they didn't know they could set the CPU Max mhz in the settings. Perhaps yours is not set to Max? Not sure where exactly in the settings it is but I'm sure it isn't hard to find
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
I've been through the settings menu in the phone numerous times. Have not seen an option like that nor do I think it exists? For the most part the phone runs smooth I do notice it lags/hangs up sometimes but I'm guessing that's because the processor isn't going to full potential.
Anyone else have any ideas or where I can find this mysterious setting?
I've noticed on my sprint phone that as the phone gets warm the upper limit that the CPU can scale to seems to be reduced. The day I got it the first quad run was about 5k, but after 30min of nonstop usage the next run was down to 3.5 or so. Check it yourself with setcpu, it will start capping at 1100-1200.
OgremustCrush said:
I've noticed on my sprint phone that as the phone gets warm the upper limit that the CPU can scale to seems to be reduced. The day I got it the first quad run was about 5k, but after 30min of nonstop usage the next run was down to 3.5 or so. Check it yourself with setcpu, it will start capping at 1100-1200.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will check it out but considering even after a battery pull and letting the phone sit power off for an hour I still get crappy scores. Then theres others who can run Quadrant back to back to back to back to back and achieve 4500 - 5100 constantly. I can't even get it on one try! I'll download SetCPU and see.
If you are that concerned, wipe and try it all over again.
EDIT - Damn my spotty reading, you already tried that. Sorry. Not much else to do, unless you try to restore the OS through Kies. A fresh install from a fresh source?
Or sell it on craigslist :laugh:
The phone works fine. Everything is very smooth and responds fast. It's pretty much just the benchmark scores that are throwing me off. I'll see what happens with the second S3 I will receive tomorrow. I can't imagine the heat playing a factor because this S4 is supposed to be one of the coolest running processors out there. There's a huge video on it somewhere where they did a butter melting test. Anyways time will tell I suppose.
Why do you care so much about benchmarks? Also the phone won't ramp the processor up to 1500 if it has no reason to..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
joshnichols189 said:
Why do you care so much about benchmarks? Also the phone won't ramp the processor up to 1500 if it has no reason to..
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the point of having the newest hottest phone right away? To be able to say it can do what others cant. One of those things being blowing away other phones in the benchmark arena. I just don't see why others are able to hit 5000+ scores and my device can't seem to even come close. It just makes me think there's something wrong with my handset. Do you blame me for being skeptical after the price we pay for these things?
Chicago281 said:
What's the point of having the newest hottest phone right away? To be able to say it can do what others cant. One of those things being blowing away other phones in the benchmark arena. I just don't see why others are able to hit 5000+ scores and my device can't seem to even come close. It just makes me think there's something wrong with my handset. Do you blame me for being skeptical after the price we pay for these things?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is why I buy awesome phones. I love bleeding edge hardware lol.
Sent from my Axiom MAXX!!
Chicago281 said:
What's the point of having the newest hottest phone right away? To be able to say it can do what others cant. One of those things being blowing away other phones in the benchmark arena. I just don't see why others are able to hit 5000+ scores and my device can't seem to even come close. It just makes me think there's something wrong with my handset. Do you blame me for being skeptical after the price we pay for these things?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Considering you say it works just fine and are basing these problems that you have off of Quadrant..
Also I guess I will try and help since you are from Chicago they're should definitely be a setting somewhere that allows you to change the CPU settings. I'm not positive where but I did read in a review this was the first phone out of the box able to adjust governors. I would look but I'm on CM9
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
I've searched AndroidForums, Here, Google, can't find anything on being able to change the cpu speed without rooting.
Someone have the setcpu xda download page need the link, thx.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Chicago281 said:
I've searched AndroidForums, Here, Google, can't find anything on being able to change the cpu speed without rooting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might only be the international version.. I read it in a review from one of the tech sites.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Do you perhaps have the CPU Power Saving option on in the Power Saving menu?
Diviance said:
Do you perhaps have the CPU Power Saving option on in the Power Saving menu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First post last paragraph.. No
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Chicago281 said:
I've been through the settings menu in the phone numerous times. Have not seen an option like that nor do I think it exists? For the most part the phone runs smooth I do notice it lags/hangs up sometimes but I'm guessing that's because the processor isn't going to full potential.
Anyone else have any ideas or where I can find this mysterious setting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a setting for this, it's actually incorporated in the power savings mode. If you read through it, there is an area that says the max cpu speed is actually lowered when it's enabled. But, if you're not using the power saver mode, then it's irrelevant to your situation. It could have to do with the bloat though, and also the international is almost double the scores as ours yet there is minimal difference in speed presented in side by side real usage testing. I wouldn't get too hung up on the benchmarks, it kind of ruins the enjoyment you get from just using the phone, and seeing how smooth and flawless most everything is. Also, once debated and tweaked, those scores will most definitely improve and will probably ease your mind a bit.
I'm running Blackout v3.0, and it's running pretty smooth at first. But now my phone is stuffed with bunch of apps, making it running slower and slower. I want to keep those apps so I'm willing to overclock but I afraid of damaging my phone. So I would like to ask what's the safe overclocking frequency? I want the optimum frequency, fast enough and safe/stable.
ImjuzCY said:
I'm running Blackout v3.0, and it's running pretty smooth at first. But now my phone is stuffed with bunch of apps, making it running slower and slower. I want to keep those apps so I'm willing to overclock but I afraid of damaging my phone. So I would like to ask what's the safe overclocking frequency? I want the optimum frequency, fast enough and safe/stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any overclocking can be unsafe as it can shorten the lifespan of your memory and CPU. But with that said I run mine at 1200 with no issues. Most people don't go higher than 1600 but anything 1400 or lower is not going to burn it up too quick IMO. Everyones hardware will react differently though.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda app-developers app
They usually say phone will get damaged, but I think its a myth. You can go up to 1600. After that it will get unstable.
Sent from my Inspire 4G
ImjuzCY said:
I'm running Blackout v3.0, and it's running pretty smooth at first. But now my phone is stuffed with bunch of apps, making it running slower and slower. I want to keep those apps so I'm willing to overclock but I afraid of damaging my phone. So I would like to ask what's the safe overclocking frequency? I want the optimum frequency, fast enough and safe/stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run IceColdSandwich and have found 1459MHz to be the best combo of performance and stability on my phone. Every phone handles OCing a little differently, some can reportedly take over 1600 without a flinch and others will lock regularly with even a slight OC. Just experiment with the "set at boot" option turned off until you find something that works reliably on your phone.
Is it true you guys aren't seeing ill effects on your battery by overclocking like that?
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
asif9t9 said:
Is it true you guys aren't seeing ill effects on your battery by overclocking like that?
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think OC can affect battery drain only if you use an application which utilizes a full cpu load. But, if you're using this app in normal mode, economy will not be great also. So, when you using your phone for calling or general usage you will not see any problems with battery discharge.
I'm using DHD with Blackout v3.0 and I set 1200Mhz for maximum cpu value. I have no problems, phone is stable. Some time ago I used Leedroid ROM and set also 1200Mhz, but phone was rebooted by itself very often. More than twice a day.
You should try to use OC, as someone said above, without "set on boot" option. I think there is no danger for hardware up to 1600Mhz.
asif9t9 said:
Is it true you guys aren't seeing ill effects on your battery by overclocking like that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not under normal use. There's a school of thought that says even though the increased speed requires more power, it can also finish tasks and go back to sleep faster, so it ends up being a wash. I've overclocked all three smartphones I've owned to date and haven't experienced any significant difference in battery life.
ai6908 said:
They usually say phone will get damaged, but I think its a myth. You can go up to 1600. After that it will get unstable.
Sent from my Inspire 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They say that as a precautionary measure just as they say flashing a custom ROM can be dangerous. For people who don't know what they're doing. But precaution aside, just like you said you can go up to 1600 MHz safely on this phone. I know every phone behaves differently but on average no one has issues upto that frequency. But above that frequency the phone might be unstable. The CPU will be drawing much more power at high frequencies and will heat up more. The CPU heating up too much and too frequently reduces the life of the CPU. So it's not a myth.
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
2ghz.... the phone is old now. Make it bleed.
Sent from my Desire HD
Don't try to Cross above 1600.
Has anyone tested ECO Mode (labeled "Quad Core Control" under settings)?
I'm curious if it improves battery for anyone else. I have gotten about the same results with it on and off. Same goes for performance, no noticeable difference with it on or off.
What's everyone else's results?
I've kept Eco Mode on all the time but I've only had the phone for three days though so not enough time to really test out the difference yet.
NastyNate208 said:
Has anyone tested ECO Mode (labeled "Quad Core Control" under settings)?
I'm curious if it improves battery for anyone else. I have gotten about the same results with it on and off. Same goes for performance, no noticeable difference with it on or off.
What's everyone else's results?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here no difference. Maybe it overheats less with it on but I haven't fully tested that either
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
I believe it dynamically sets the affinity for each process on different cores.
So for instance, process A might be on core 0, while process B, C, and D are on core 1, 2, and 3 respectively.
This doesn't account for dual and quad core optimizations by developers, and just assumes that only 4 processes are running (in reality its dozens or more).
The main goal is to spread the work to keep the load down.
Less load = lower clock frequency.
If you've ever done any underclocking or overclocking, each step up uses more power.
Of course, this could also be all wrong, and it could just make the kernel undervolt and underclock and raise the response time between steps.
Sent from my LG Optimus Prime G
I have a widget on the home screen that shows clock speed, temp, and cpu load. I have yet to see any differences on it. The temps reach the same levels, it still goes from .384 to 1.512, cpu load seemed to go up maybe 10% if any. The only thing i noticed was that when i would click Home, it seemed to take a bit longer to load my layout. I can't say i noticed any thing different on battery life, which to be honest i have been very impressed with.
Sent from my LG-LS970
With eco mode on. It sleeps better it doesn't go in a straight line with it off
Sent from my LG-LS970 using xda app-developers app
about eco mode - it really work http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35889383#post35889383
jej4christ said:
I have a widget on the home screen that shows clock speed, temp, and cpu load. I have yet to see any differences on it. The temps reach the same levels, it still goes from .384 to 1.512, cpu load seemed to go up maybe 10% if any. The only thing i noticed was that when i would click Home, it seemed to take a bit longer to load my layout. I can't say i noticed any thing different on battery life, which to be honest i have been very impressed with.
Sent from my LG-LS970
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What widget is that?
Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 2
agurzhiy said:
about eco mode - it really work http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=35889383#post35889383
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read your post and looked at the screen shots but can't read that language, so I'm not sure which is Eco mode on and which is off.
Can you elaborate on "it really works" please?
the second one is eco mode...
Sorry if I'm late in this information, but apparently Eco mode disables core 2 and 3, and leaves core 0 and 1 running.
So if it's Eco or not really depends on the workload on the processor.
Sent from my LG Optimus Prime G
no, with eco all 4 cores work. every bench says that
Hm, well it's either the program just reporting that there are 4 device Id's for the CPU, or it could actually be that the four cores are working.
My last post was just something I picked up off a Google search.
Sent from my LG Optimus Prime G
Thought eco mode switches off 2 cores
And only runs in dual core mode
Some sort of hot plug feature
Sent from my LG-E971 using xda app-developers app
trincisor said:
Thought eco mode switches off 2 cores
And only runs in dual core mode
Some sort of hot plug feature
Sent from my LG-E971 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought that too, but people are saying otherwise.
Sent from my LG Optimus Prime G
rsjc741 said:
I thought that too, but people are saying otherwise.
Sent from my LG Optimus Prime G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know at least when display is off it hot plugs two of the cores
Other times it uses a diffrent CPU Governor
Lg patented the eco mode
Sent from my LG-E971 using xda app-developers app
stated by google employees and disproved by CyanogenMod's Acree
http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile...rooted-android-phones-proven-useless-2013014/
Figured as much but I was hopeful this was a real break threw for android.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Nothing with that cool of a name can be useless.
But seriously I do notice a clear improvement the moment I turn it on no matter what these people say.
For instance the app I am using to type this on, Tapatalk can lag badly loading forums. I have noticed when the Seeder is turned on this never lags at all. YMMV.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
I. Don't care what android Dev says. It works. I bet it doesn't make much difference on a new device, but on a lower speced device' it does wonders.
Sent from my SX-SP715A using xda app-developers app
Boy this app is causing some discussion. Running on HP Touchpad on cm9. Battery burns faster, but improvement outways that loss. Works for me.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
mitchellvii said:
Nothing with that cool of a name can be useless.
But seriously I do notice a clear improvement the moment I turn it on no matter what these people say.
For instance the app I am using to type this on, Tapatalk can lag badly loading forums. I have noticed when the Seeder is turned on this never lags at all. YMMV.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
masondoctorjt said:
I. Don't care what android Dev says. It works. I bet it doesn't make much difference on a new device, but on a lower speced device' it does wonders.
Sent from my SX-SP715A using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
milski65 said:
Boy this app is causing some discussion. Running on HP Touchpad on cm9. Battery burns faster, but improvement outways that loss. Works for me.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you didnt happened to read the article, it only improves performance by continuously invoking all cores at the highest clock speed available on your kernel. this IS NOT a good thing.
" the app is forcing the CPU to stick to higher clock frequencies due to the constant I/O use. For many users, the processor running faster offers a smoother experience at the cost of your battery. As many users began to notice, Seeder was causing otherwise full day smartphones to die in four hours."
I read the article a few times. What I got from it is if constantly on, we will see a significant decrease in battery? So, can this decrease the life of the processor or is is it strictly related to battery performance? If just battery performance, I would give that up especially in the evenings when my phone is on a charger when I catch up on all the forums and rom development or searching websites that run videos or load alot of pictures. I can see not using while mobile but if I have a charger readily available I would run this as I am now and seeing significant differences.
Sent from my SCH-R950 using Tapatalk 2
t3project said:
if you didnt happened to read the article, it only improves performance by continuously invoking all cores at the highest clock speed available on your kernel. this IS NOT a good thing.
" the app is forcing the CPU to stick to higher clock frequencies due to the constant I/O use. For many users, the processor running faster offers a smoother experience at the cost of your battery. As many users began to notice, Seeder was causing otherwise full day smartphones to die in four hours."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it lowers battery life and thus you say it is USELESS? How about those of us with spare batteries who want performance and don't care about lowered battery life? We want our rigs to scream and this mod seems to help.
Hardly useless. Better to update your OP to say, "If battery life is your number one consideration then this may not be the mod for you, but if you want to phone to run at it's fastest and don't care so much about battery life, you may enjoy this ..."
Users can turn it on when they have access to AC power and turn it off when they are going to be away from the juice for a while.
there are easier ways of boosting performance at the cost of battery life.
Performance governor does the trick just fine. (or setting min/max to the same clock speed.
m4xwellmurd3r said:
there are easier ways of boosting performance at the cost of battery life.
Performance governor does the trick just fine. (or setting min/max to the same clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already do all that. This mod makes it even faster for me.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
mitchellvii said:
I already do all that. This mod makes it even faster for me.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's called the placebo effect. The app doesn't do anything beyond keeping your cpu at higher clock speeds.if you're already doing this, then is doing nothing for you.
Tapatalk is a network intensive application. Whatever performance gains you perceive, are likely due to network issues.
I think your quad core phone with 2gb of ram can handle tapatalk.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2
finalhit said:
That's called the placebo effect. The app doesn't do anything beyond keeping your cpu at higher clock speeds.if you're already doing this, then is doing nothing for you.
Tapatalk is a network intensive application. Whatever performance gains you perceive, are likely due to network issues.
I think your quad core phone with 2gb of ram can handle tapatalk.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please stop trying to tell me what I am experiencing and what I am not. I have been using smart phones for many years. I KNOW whether something is having a real effect or not.
I don't have the Seeder mod turn on by default. The other day after changing out my battery I opened Tapatalk and noticed that it was loading a half page of threads and then hanging. I turned the Seeder mod on and it immediately started loading the entire page. I turned it off and again it lagged.
There is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that this mod is making at least certain apps run faster.
The all powerful experts don't say it doesn't work they just say it burns battery (which is fine with me). Please stop projecting your apparent obsession with battery life onto the rest of us.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
mitchellvii said:
So it lowers battery life and thus you say it is USELESS? How about those of us with spare batteries who want performance and don't care about lowered battery life? We want our rigs to scream and this mod seems to help.
Hardly useless. Better to update your OP to say, "If battery life is your number one consideration then this may not be the mod for you, but if you want to phone to run at it's fastest and don't care so much about battery life, you may enjoy this ..."
Users can turn it on when they have access to AC power and turn it off when they are going to be away from the juice for a while.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i say it is useless because it doesnt do anything you cant already do better. it's being marketed as if it is some new miracle program when it isnt. perseus at 1.8ghz w/ performance gov on will outperform this everyday, simply because the program is writing to your nand constantly, whereas, any kernel overclocked can do this without writing to nand. battery life wasnt really what i was talking about.
i pretty positive the continual writing/erasing of things from your nand is not a good thing and will significantly decrease the life of the emmc/nand on your phone as well as the life of your cpu.
I tried it and It works great on my one. I'm using icy snap 1.5 and it was little bit lagy but now 2x faster than before... :thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk 2
I thought it was snake oil when I first saw it as well. Such a minor change would have been found long ago. Kinda like you won't see a minor tweak that anyone can do to fuel injectors that will improve gas mileage by 10mpg.
-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"
I think I might slap a Vtec sticker on my phone. I'll see if it gives me a performance bump too.
Sent from my Galaxy Note II using XDA Premium.
mitchellvii said:
Please stop trying to tell me what I am experiencing and what I am not. I have been using smart phones for many years. I KNOW whether something is having a real effect or not.
I don't have the Seeder mod turn on by default. The other day after changing out my battery I opened Tapatalk and noticed that it was loading a half page of threads and then hanging. I turned the Seeder mod on and it immediately started loading the entire page. I turned it off and again it lagged.
There is NO DOUBT WHATSOEVER that this mod is making at least certain apps run faster.
The all powerful experts don't say it doesn't work they just say it burns battery (which is fine with me). Please stop projecting your apparent obsession with battery life onto the rest of us.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, you don't. Even the most experienced developers can't tell if their own applications are running faster specifically due to any one thing just by running them.
To make a causal connection, you not only need to do proper benchmarks, but also understand why.
The mod does have a side effect of keeping your clock speed higher, which can speed up your device...but if you said you've already set your governor to performance, then the mod is doing nothing for you.
And again, tapatalk is a network intensive application. Whatever improvement you see is much ado with network congestion that anything this mod can do.
...but c'mon, really though...tapatalk is your benchmark? My evo shift can handle tapatalk without lag.
Any lag you see in tapatalk is network related. And any improvement you see in tapatalk is network related.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2
Oh well. I continue to be amused by the fact that individuals who are not in possession of my phone seem to know better how my phone is performing that I do.
Let me say it again. My phone JUST RUNS FASTER with this mod enabled. Period, end of sentence.
And you claim that SetCPU does exactly what this mod does if I set it at 1.8 performance? But you admit that this mod does it in a completely different way? So how do you know this doesn't add an extra benefit since it is doing something differently? You don't.
You keep talking about how tapatalk is network based and therefore this mod could have no effect. Did you consider that this mod may cause network data to be parsed faster and more efficiently? Image heavy web pages also load faster. The improvement is undeniable.
I promise you I will have sold or thrown away this phone long before the memory gets burned out.
Many many people feel this works for them yet you assume its all in our heads. Its not. Stick to your own head.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 03:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------
The time I notice the most improvement is after I have been multitasking for a while. Without this mod I have noticed my GN2 kind of bogs down unless I clear memory. With this mod things seem to stay refreshed on their own.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
I'm convinced that by constantly having bowel movements that my toilet flushes faster.
mitchellvii said:
Oh well. I continue to be amused by the fact that individuals who are not in possession of my phone seem to know better how my phone is performing that I do.
Let me say it again. My phone JUST RUNS FASTER with this mod enabled. Period, end of sentence.
And you claim that SetCPU does exactly what this mod does if I set it at 1.8 performance? But you admit that this mod does it in a completely different way? So how do you know this doesn't add an extra benefit since it is doing something differently? You don't.
You keep talking about how tapatalk is network based and therefore this mod could have no effect. Did you consider that this mod may cause network data to be parsed faster and more efficiently? Image heavy web pages also load faster. The improvement is undeniable.
I promise you I will have sold or thrown away this phone long before the memory gets burned out.
Many many people feel this works for them yet you assume its all in our heads. Its not. Stick to your own head.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 03:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------
The time I notice the most improvement is after I have been multitasking for a while. Without this mod I have noticed my GN2 kind of bogs down unless I clear memory. With this mod things seem to stay refreshed on their own.
Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it doesn't. It didn't claim to do that. It claims to do one thing and thing only: it keeps /dev/random primed. Read the description of the app.
As a side effect, it keeps your clock "awake" and at a higher level. This is equivalent to switching to performance governor...but doing so in a manual way. (Less efficient way)
I think that's the problem with your over confidence. You are so sure that it's working...You don't even understand what the app does.
And the app definitely has no effect on memory management. Priming /dev/random will do nothing of the sort.
Also,You may not have noticed, I have the same phone as you. Of course, it's possible the app doesn't work for non-believers.
Yes, I know your next argument...it's not placebo because this makes things just seem faster.
I can't argue against that logic, but causality is definitely against you.
swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2