anyone know of a good program for this? i'm using bankarama & it's ok but i'd like to try something else out too. thanks!
I have the 'wifi not working properly" that many others have reported. I'm still on 2.3.3 and have hopes that 2.3.4 may fix this. But does anyone know if the Cyanogen mod, when available for the Arc, will fix this? Does it change the wifi at all?
transfers said:
But does anyone know if the Cyanogen mod, when available for the Arc, will fix this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, maybe not, who knows until we get it.
XperienceD said:
Maybe, maybe not, who knows until we get it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking perhaps of an educated guess about what the mods do, but without wanting to post in the Developers forum
I know its not written in the code for google yet but the Gnex has the hardware built in. Has anyone been able to activate the chip and maybe write their own code to make it work?
newtonfb said:
I know its not written in the code for google yet but the Gnex has the hardware built in. Has anyone been able to activate the chip and maybe write their own code to make it work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never seen it. It's not a ROM issue either, it's up to the support from the kernel which carries along the drivers.. which talk to the hardware.
akira02rex said:
I've never seen it. It's not a ROM issue either, it's up to the support from the kernel which carries along the drivers.. which talk to the hardware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So nobody knows how or nobody really cares to take the time to do it? Im just curious. I know theres alot of guys on these forums that know how to do a ton, didnt know if it was possible.
newtonfb said:
So nobody knows how or nobody really cares to take the time to do it? Im just curious. I know theres alot of guys on these forums that know how to do a ton, didnt know if it was possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you want someone to try to write a driver to fix something that isn't broken?
063_XOBX said:
So you want someone to try to write a driver to fix something that isn't broken?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
isnt broken..what the hell you talking about? It has to be enabled thats all. Obviously if i was smart enough to do it then i would. It was a simple question and i was hoping somebody with knowledge unlike yourself would give me an answer
newtonfb said:
So nobody knows how or nobody really cares to take the time to do it? Im just curious. I know theres alot of guys on these forums that know how to do a ton, didnt know if it was possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll have to go to Google with that question. It obviously ain't trivial to be done by a community, because I can imagine it would already be done by now.
Actually the work was started on by someone who was developing for the cukoo watch, but was abondonded when google switched bluetooth stack from bluez.
So if you are using an older rom and your hardware supported it you could in theory use this project
https://github.com/android-btle/
Someone else did not like the switch to the new BT stack so they created a project to put the bluez back into android.. Unfourtunately it appears some packages were removed..
http://gitorious.org/android-bluez
Just some of my research into the matter
As far as I've seen, this is something that is unsupported -- I'm wondering if it wouldn't be too hard to enable.
Has anyone seen a custom rom where this works?
Any idea regarding difficulty of implementing it?
duraaraa said:
As far as I've seen, this is something that is unsupported -- I'm wondering if it wouldn't be too hard to enable.
Has anyone seen a custom rom where this works?
Any idea regarding difficulty of implementing it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a way to get this to work because I've looked it up before. Would definitely drain your battery more. Just do a Google search you will find what your looking for.
I read that mirroring works on some custom roms... Possibly RR? If that is the case, does anyone know what changes were implemented to do this? Obviously it's not just the same couple of lines in the buildprop that it used to be, but would still be worth any extra work in my opinion. Can anyone shed some light? Thanks!