Guys, a good news, I think arco had started to build a Kernel 3.x, which may be better for ICS, and necessary for JB to get a full butter experience
Kindly refer to: https://github.com/arco/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/tree/ics-3.0
Cheers
MyDeSTiNaTe said:
Guys, a good news, I think arco had started to build a Kernel 3.x, which may be better for ICS, and necessary for JB to get a full butter experience
Kindly refer to: https://github.com/arco/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/tree/ics-3.0
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is good news, awesome work for arco68
good news for us
actually what are differences between kernel 2.6xx and 3.x ?
I think that a Kernel 3.x will support Project Butter. Maybe better battery life.
Arcp develop 3.X
MyDeSTiNaTe said:
Guys, a good news, I think arco had started to build a Kernel 3.x, which may be better for ICS, and necessary for JB to get a full butter experience
Kindly refer to: https://github.com/arco/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/tree/ics-3.0
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YEP!!! I had checked. Arco our master.
:silly: I think our Master Arco really can't run away from our microscope
A billion :highfive: GREAT JOB dude
Note: Though this is not for our Galaxy W, but I think we have faith on Master Arco
This is not for wonder?
hadidjapri said:
good news for us
actually what are differences between kernel 2.6xx and 3.x ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better RAM management, performance, more stable than 2.6.xx, and ofc support for project butter.
Sry for bad english.
azhiekurosaki said:
This is not for wonder?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its for Samsung SGH-T679M Galaxy W 4G (Samsung Ancora) and Samsung SGH-T679 Exhibit II 4G (Samsung Ancora).
But ours Galaxy W Samsung GT-i8150 Galaxy W (Samsung Ancora).
I has faith with Master Arco's potential and ability. :good:
wong.izzat said:
Its for Samsung SGH-T679M Galaxy W 4G (Samsung Ancora) and Samsung SGH-T679 Exhibit II 4G (Samsung Ancora).
But ours Galaxy W Samsung GT-i8150 Galaxy W (Samsung Ancora).
I has faith with Master Arco's potential and ability. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm pretty sure there will be a devs who can port the 3.x kernel to our w :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
It's for the SGH-T679, GT-I9001 *AND* GT-I8150, so no worries.
arco68 said:
It's for the SGH-T679, GT-I9001 *AND* GT-I8150, so no worries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck Master! :-$
Sent from my W + arco CM9b2
arco68 said:
It's for the SGH-T679, GT-I9001 *AND* GT-I8150, so no worries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow... this is just sooooooooooooooo awesome.............. thanks master:good::good::good::good::good::good::good::good:
Im from s plus forum.
We have a Developer Called Ivendor. He made a 3.0.x Kernel from Arcos Galaxy W sources. So i think you guys can be very happy to have such a Pro developer like Arco.
Have fun with your devices!
Greetz xellar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quoted from CM9 BETA2 thread.
galaxy s+ has similar hardware with our W right? can we try to port their 3.X kernel for our W ?
---------- Post added at 01:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 PM ----------
Im from s plus forum.
We have a Developer Called Ivendor. He made a 3.0.x Kernel from Arcos Galaxy W sources. So i think you guys can be very happy to have such a Pro developer like Arco.
Have fun with your devices!
Greetz xellar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quoted from CM9 BETA2 thread.
galaxy s+ has similar hardware with our W right? can we try to port their 3.X kernel for our W ?
arco68 said:
It's for the SGH-T679, GT-I9001 *AND* GT-I8150, so no worries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad to hear this! goodluck Arco
hadidjapri said:
quoted from CM9 BETA2 thread.
galaxy s+ has similar hardware with our W right? can we try to port their 3.X kernel for our W ?
---------- Post added at 01:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:04 PM ----------
quoted from CM9 BETA2 thread.
galaxy s+ has similar hardware with our W right? can we try to port their 3.X kernel for our W ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
don't worry, like arco said the kernel is for W too, just matter of time
everything about kernel is easily portable from s+
the main problem are ancora-specific files like board.. and lack of enthusiasts, cause our phone is not so popular
dimaka1256 said:
everything about kernel is easily portable from s+
the main problem are ancora-specific files like board.. and lack of enthusiasts, cause our phone is not so popular
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
porting the kernel 3.0 on our galaxy s plus also so difficult,the specific files like board also port by Arco ,and ivendor modify into our device. thanks all developers!
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Ezekiel1998 said:
porting the kernel 3.0 on our galaxy s plus also so difficult,the specific files like board was port by ivendors thanks all developers!
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agree. we can see in their development pages, 3.x kernel is still in development
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Ehhh, who ported it and got it running in the first place? That's right, me. And what phone do I have? That's right, Galaxy W. So obviously it also works for the Galaxy W. The board files for the S+ is based on the work done on the board files for the W, not the other way around.
I think the next cm9 release by arco will using 3.x.x kernel, but maybe the beta 3 will come out about one month (or less?) as the kernel was hardly WIP. Goodluck arco, you make sammy looks like piece of sh*t
-sent from my awesome phone-
arco68 said:
Ehhh, who ported it and got it running in the first place? That's right, me. And what phone do I have? That's right, Galaxy W. So obviously it also works for the Galaxy W. The board files for the S+ is based on the work done on the board files for the W, not the other way around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck arco ! :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Related
Here's the link on Samsung's facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/sams...dwich-upgrade-for-galaxy-s-ii/390405030989148
Says Galaxy W gets gingerbread update from end of March with Face Unlock, Photo Edit,etc.Comments??
Sent from my Wonder
I don't think that kind of minor upgrade would benefit us a lot. Just wait for CM9 from acro.
At least this 'Value Pack' will add some value to GB. Its a good news for GB's lovers, but all here including me wants ICS.
I hope arco will release CM9 to public in April.
Well we DL these n separate them n keep for future use...
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
irishpancake said:
Where the Sun don't shine??
:banghead:
Sent from my GT-I8150 on Lanzarote Canary Vacation using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude...show ur infamous pics that we usually answers about Sammy's ****..i luv that looks .
sent from another space
@irishpancake...
Hahahahahahahaha....dude that was phuckin' awk..!!I just dunno why I luv that pic....xD
Honestly,,I luv the device but I piss off with thier corporate ideology and craps philosophy..
sent from another space
At least allow is to zoom at full resolution?
Sent from my GT-I8150 with broken camera and broken LCD flash
This value pack actually translates to u will never get ICS. Its looking less likely that an ICS rom will ever appear frim any modder. They r worse than samsung they tease us with how good it is yet never let us put it on our devices. Stinks awfully like vapourware to me. A device less than 6 months old has been dropped. I will never buy another samsybg product again. as of now this piece of crap galaxy is going onsale and i will buy from someone else. abyobe else buying from samsung look elsewhere.
This is super sick. What do Samsung really want? I guess this might be an indirect way saying ICS won't be out for the W. Gah, I will hate the value pack. -.-
Sent from my GT-I8150 using XDA
andynroid said:
qzem is leaving us.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What????
Sent from my Wonder
2g11 said:
What????
Sent from my Wonder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I meant he has sold his W now using a diff phone..check his last post in GingerIce
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Cyanogenmod for GT-18 150 in which the download link
---------- Post added at 08:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:15 PM ----------
so the term Cyanogenmod mengancurkan camera system, not what's important and good internet problems cyanogen cool ROOM
densinyo said:
Cyanogenmod for GT-18 150 in which the download link
---------- Post added at 08:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:15 PM ----------
so the term Cyanogenmod mengancurkan camera system, not what's important and good internet problems cyanogen cool ROOM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ngk ngerti mas ... what do you mean by that bro ???
Samsung will update the next models with a special ”value pack” update.
- Samsung I9000 Galaxy S.
- Samsung I9001 Galaxy S Plus.
- Samsung I9003 Galaxy SL.
- Samsung I8150 Galaxy W.
- Samsung P1000 Galaxy Tab.
This Value pack will be available upcoming months.
You could get a update via KIES or OTA (over the air)
What means: ”value pack”
A value pack is a special update for smartphones to give them a extra boost.
This value pack will give you things like facelock, small interface changes, battery and speed.
All value packs are based on Android 2.3.6!
the reason these manufacturers deny us ICS is the claim that our devices can not handle ICS and their useless customization like touchwiz (Samsung) and sense (HTC) together. Emphasis on the "claim".
Now Samsung sold over ten million galaxy s and w who knows how many.
Can we just force them to release pure ICS and say screw touchwiz... or at least release the drivers so that our beloved and capable developers here port ics for us.
There are so many users unhappy with this treatment of the manufacturers.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using XDA
thearif said:
the reason these manufacturers deny us ICS is the claim that our devices can not handle ICS and their useless customization like touchwiz (Samsung) and sense (HTC) together. Emphasis on the "claim".
Now Samsung sold over ten million galaxy s and w who knows how many.
Can we just force them to release pure ICS and say screw touchwiz... or at least release the drivers so that our beloved and capable developers here port ics for us.
There are so many users unhappy with this treatment of the manufacturers.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At-least Samsung should release source code so that drivers could be compiled in latest Kernel.
I mean where I can download Cyanogenmod to..GT 18150
densinyo said:
I mean where I can download Cyanogenmod to..GT 18150
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not open to public yet...next week is the Alpha Beta Release...
N to whoever is trolling up there no ICS for SGW from a Developer you must be out dated...
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
so next week already on the waiting master andynroid
Unread
densinyo said:
so next week already on the waiting master andynroid
Unread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ITS THE BEST EVER ROM.....SUPER SMOOTH N RESPONSIVE....!
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda premium
Will JellyBean ever be available to Gio? What is your opinion? Do you think it is possible? And what will CM name it?
erikcas said:
Will JellyBean ever be available to Gio? What is your opinion? Do you think it is possible? And what will CM name it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We don't have sources - no one knows if it would run on Gio.
wojtek267 said:
We don't have sources - no one knows if it would run on Gio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
See latest post on Maclaws website.
erikcas said:
See latest post on Maclaws website.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I saw it already...
1. sources will be aviable in 1,5 week ...
2. jellybean runs with some more kernel execute and with the most libs from ics 4.0.4 (cm9) so it will work on gio
3. only a few libs must be rebuilded from source like audio libs, wifi binaries and the buttter libs ....
4. cm10/cm9
explaination: jb are not much modifications.
only butter project and some improvements from google and thats why i think that it falls under cm9
thats all in all for jb
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.1
DQiB said:
1. sources will be aviable in 1,5 week ...
2. jellybean runs with some more kernel execute and with the most libs from ics 4.0.4 (cm9) so it will work on gio
3. only a few libs must be rebuilded from source like audio libs, wifi binaries and the buttter libs ....
4. cm10/cm9
explaination: jb are not much modifications.
only butter project and some improvements from google and thats why i think that it falls under cm9
thats all in all for jb
Send from my Galaxy Tab P1000 using Android 4.1 Alpha 0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Liquidroms already have jb repo. Maybe I will try something later this week.
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
I just found this while randomly browsing:
miroslav_mm said:
Hardware LG GT540 (msm7227) - dont support triple buffer and vsync. This components need for Project Butter UI which using in 4.1, so I dont sure if 4.1 will work on our phone, maybe CM will make dirty-hack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And as gio sports a msm7227 this doesn't look good for jelly bean for gio....
Sent from my HTC Sensation
iok1 said:
I just found this while randomly browsing:
And as gio sports a msm7227 this doesn't look good for jelly bean for gio....
Sent from my HTC Sensation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Macław said JB would run on Gio. I trust in his words
wojtek267 said:
Macław said JB would run on Gio. I trust in his words
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the least it will have the same performance as ics, no butter for gio.
Sent from my HTC Sensation
iok1 said:
At the least it will have the same performance as ics, no butter for gio.
Sent from my HTC Sensation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When maclaw's ICS project is yet not done , then why are we thinking about JB ?
Feel of ICS is still left
RuCk
FulEs!
Avilove.Cullen said:
When maclaw's ICS project is yet not done , then why are we thinking about JB ?
Feel of ICS is still left
RuCk
FulEs!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree on that. It is the reason why I started this topic. So it can be referred to whenever someone starts about it again in the dev section
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
erikcas said:
Totally agree on that. It is the reason why I started this topic. So it can be referred to whenever someone starts about it again in the dev section
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ics is now outdated but still we are waiting for it..
Avilove.Cullen said:
Ics is now outdated but still we are waiting for it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right. ICS was before world war II
erikcas said:
You're right. ICS was before world war II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You dont say?
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda premium
erikcas said:
You're right. ICS was before world war II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good joke
I mean now every where, in each forum we will see ics but still we have not got bug free version .. So how can we think of jb? May be our children will get jb
Avilove.Cullen said:
Good joke
I mean now every where, in each forum we will see ics but still we have not got bug free version .. So how can we think of jb? May be our children will get jb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about galaxy nexus? It isnt bug-free there?
iok1 said:
What about galaxy nexus? It isnt bug-free there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they have not bug free ics but still they can get as per there hardware specifications ..
Galaxy nexus developer are now moving to jelly bean
Avilove.Cullen said:
I think they have not bug free ics but still they can get as per there hardware specifications ..
Galaxy nexus developer are now moving to jelly bean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uhm galaxy nexus has bug free ics as far as stable as google rolled it out.?
voetbalremco said:
uhm galaxy nexus has bug free ics as far as stable as google rolled it out.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you telling me or interrogating me? ?
I don't know about galaxy nexus
Si usted le da sentido a continuación, obtener el respeto .. Mi mente joven que
voetbalremco said:
You dont say?
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did say say that
Whwn someone says ICS is outdated that can be the only (cynical) reaction one can give in my opinion
Sent from my GT-S5660 using xda app-developers app
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy y roms can be installed on the galaxy ace i s5380i only by changing dpi and kernel but not on the original ace that uses the qualcomm processor and there is no ics for ace i
Enviado desde mi GT-S5360 usando Tapatalk 2
I wanna ask something....
How about safariking's CM9 Project???
Canceled? Aborted? Or Still in progress ?
Sent from my Phone !!!
Rikxzdjz said:
I wanna ask something....
How about safariking's CM9 Project???
Canceled? Aborted? Or Still in progress ?
Sent from my Phone !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thread was closed but for now we should try to have a working CM7 instead of trying to build CM9
Enviado desde mi GT-S5360 usando Tapatalk 2
Porobu said:
The thread was closed but for now we should try to have a working CM7 instead of trying to build CM9
Enviado desde mi GT-S5360 usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ... i'm just curious about the CM9... stopped suddenly...
How about CM7 Bugs ?? Bugs fixed list and bug list.... i was confused to the thread....
Sent from my Phone !!!
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no one ever try that but similar method has been done a long time ago for cm7. all running cm7 for sgy is ported from ace. wifi dead, bluetooth dead, graphic buggy, etc.
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Hello everyone, I'm associated with custom roms for sgy. Recently I met a person, who had successfully installed an sgy custom rom in galaxy ace. These two phones are more similar than we ever thought. So, why not the other way around??? Interested devs could actually modify ace ics roms and install it on y, instead of fiddling with galaxy mini????
Fantastic idea, I know, bit not improbable ...Coz I still have the Guy's pm ....
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As he said there are lot of bugs!! and by the efforts of devs it seems like fixing that is more tough than building a new one!!!
CM9 project Stopped! Sorry everyone can't get it to work whatever i did
Bad news.... :thumbdown:
Sent from my Phone !!!
safariking said:
CM9 project Stopped! Sorry everyone can't get it to work whatever i did
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No prob....u tried ur best....d main fact is that der can't be a CM9 for sgy....d best we can do is build a custom rom closest to it....btw, do u guys know if ace has CM9?
Sent from heaven!
anasdcool71 said:
No prob....u tried ur best....d main fact is that der can't be a CM9 for sgy....d best we can do is build a custom rom closest to it....btw, do u guys know if ace has CM9?
Sent from heaven!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree.... :thumbup:
At least we had a working CM7 is enough....
Sent from my Phone !!!
Rikxzdjz said:
Agree.... :thumbup:
At least we had a working CM7 is enough....
Sent from my Phone !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ace have CM9
safariking said:
Ace have CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By galaxyics team ??
Sent from my Phone !!!
Rikxzdjz said:
By galaxyics team ??
Sent from my Phone !!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! why?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1490867
Maybe he will try to port it beta 9 os the latest one from galaxyics
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Y don't those of you who are linked to the ace forum tell the devs about this???? I'm sure something IS possible ..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Filip98 said:
Maybe he will try to port it beta 9 os the latest one from galaxyics
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be possible I will ask to maclaw
If ace has cm9, can't we port it to Y...both are arm v6 devices and d hardware is almost same too....
Sent from heaven!
anasdcool71 said:
If ace has cm9, can't we port it to Y...both are arm v6 devices and d hardware is almost same too....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you might be not aware the problem. here is the analogy. i have two notebook. both have x86 cpu, both have same lcd size and same resolution. my acer one use nvidia gpu and my asus one use ati. i can install windows 7 on both, but i need different set of driver to make both running without issue. and the problem not only for gpu, but almost for everything. the only one component where both can share same driver is cpu.
in phone world the situation event much worse. in pc world we have ibm-pc compatible. none in phone world. different type using different component and different soc. armv6 only cover cpu side. the other side completely different.
irfanbagus said:
you might be not aware the problem. here is the analogy. i have two notebook. both have x86 cpu, both have same lcd size and same resolution. my acer one use nvidia gpu and my asus one use ati. i can install windows 7 on both, but i need different set of driver to make both running without issue. and the problem not only for gpu, but almost for everything. the only one component where both can share same driver is cpu.
in phone world the situation event much worse. in pc world we have ibm-pc compatible. none in phone world. different type using different component and different soc. armv6 only cover cpu side. the other side completely different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes but drivers are available for your ati gpu, your soundcard..
it will be something like a 'Frankalaxy' yes, but it would definitly be a start!
btw people must be aware of this but anyway here is an article on freeyourandroid/guide/porting-android .com [remove the space pls]
maybe this could help.
and yes the galaxy ace is closer to galaxy y due to generation of production
i.e mini/gio are old phones while ace and y are in the same generation.
Would request someone to try...
I'm from a pure symbian background and still learning android dev so....
would love if someone could lead to me some heads up article
[Google is my ally]
---------- Post added at 12:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:08 PM ----------
AvijitGhosh82 said:
Y don't those of you who are linked to the ace forum tell the devs about this???? I'm sure something IS possible ..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using your next2ics rom and loving it
waiting for your next update
(you do have an experience in rom transgening so, why dont you try it?
would love have cm9 as d almostnext2ics update )
Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
World be awesome
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Oh f**k yes!!! but I'm pretty sure the device maintainers is arco
-sent from my awesome phone-
Hell yeah
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
doesn't have galaxy s plus in the list......
but i also have galaxy w,W cm rom can port to s plus?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
hell yeah finally we got official support from cyanogenmod! :good:
Hats off to Sir Arco and all other developers. It's due to them that we have grabbed some attention !!!
Galaxy W I8150 + DXLM2 + CM9 Beta 3
It's the best news for W and S+ users! Of course CM10.1 can be ported to S+. I am supporting arco for this, Galaxy W improves further than before!!!
Great news and i'm happy that the Galaxy W is still getting supported even if it has been long forgotten by Samsung.
this is very suprising news , only can think arco as the maintainers
at last:laugh:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so it is a lie?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app
arco68 said:
Eh... who said anything about official support? That was just a proof that it's actually booting. At this point, that's about it, as pretty much nothing else is working and it's extremely buggy. Getting it to a working state may take a loooong time, and also depends on whether Qualcomm will provide sources that supports the 7x30 platform on 4.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master
Hope it will be soon, but it's enough to have W with 3.x.x kernel and CM10 for now. When Samsung forgot the W, it's good to see arco and CM Team are working on this device. Keep working on that guys.
petafly said:
Rejoice!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2027337
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read the whole thread, and not. a. single. post ever mentioned the source of the list.
So, since there is no official news release from the Cyanogenmod team, I'd say that this is hearsay...
Yes, no trustable source. I'm asking myself, why would someone add our phone to the list of the new Cyanogenmod and imply a change of policy of CM?
Thanx arco for clearing things up.
Sent from my GT-I8150 using xda app-developers app
hotheabilly said:
I just want to ask, will you release cm10 with half-usable 3.x kernel, I mean, thats severe of user don't mind using camera and video record, so its worth a shot because everybody love and want to try the butterness
thanks master
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ye I'll see if I can do a build of CM10 with 3.x kernel soon. Things are a bit overwhelming at the moment, with 3 Android versions to work on, so it's hard to find enough time to spend on them. I'm beginning to feel that Google should slow down their release cycle a bit. As it is now, there's barely enough time for us devs to get a version stable, before they release a new Android version and we'll have to start all over again.
So it seems all we have to do is to wait for now
Posted in the wrong thread
there are KitKat roms for samsung galaxy ace-fit-mini and gio, is it possible to port some of them to galaxy Y ?
samsung-galaxy-ace-fit-mini-and-gio
The simple answer is no. The Sgy
hardware is limited and besides there is no libraries or drivers for it..
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda app-developers app
BiGbu_SVK said:
there are KitKat roms for samsung galaxy ace-fit-mini and gio, is it possible to port some of them to galaxy Y ?
samsung-galaxy-ace-fit-mini-and-gio
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude we don't have a stable ics for galaxy y and u r talking of kitkat????????
not possible my frnd!!!!!!!
It is possible only if broadcom gave us the source code of the device drivers
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
BiGbu_SVK said:
there are KitKat roms for samsung galaxy ace-fit-mini and gio, is it possible to port some of them to galaxy Y ?
samsung-galaxy-ace-fit-mini-and-gio
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is possible only when a galaxy y user becomes ceo of broadcom and asks his staff to provide sources....
tony_stark_noob said:
It is possible only when a galaxy y user becomes ceo of broadcom and asks his staff to provide sources....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahaha.... i will look to get h/w accleration working even without the sources.
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.
All the best :thumbup:
The fate of humanity(sgy users oly) rests with you.....
I will be the tester of your kitkat rom if u want
Sent from my "Humble Y" using tapatalk
Just a question, devs made cm work perfectly with libs from Alcatel, why can't we do the same thing with drivers from another device runs ICS and compile cm9-10-11?
excuse my English
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
mohamedrashad said:
Just a question, devs made cm work perfectly with libs from Alcatel, why can't we do the same thing with drivers from another device runs ICS and compile cm9-10-11?
excuse my English
Sent from my GT-S5360 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chipsets is different bro, we could just take driver from galaxy grand if taking lib easy as pie :cyclops:
request Broadcom for driver.....
Mranggapo said:
Chipsets is different bro, we could just take driver from galaxy grand if taking lib easy as pie :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Galaxy Y's GPU and Galaxy Grand GPU is different.
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.
---------- Post added at 12:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:29 AM ----------
imElectronica said:
request Broadcom for driver.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard CharsiBabu said in his Facebook that the contract between Sammy and Broadcom has ended. So, broadcom purged all of their sources for our device.
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.
luqman98 said:
No. Galaxy Y's GPU and Galaxy Grand GPU is different.
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.
---------- Post added at 12:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:29 AM ----------
I heard CharsiBabu said in his Facebook that the contract between Sammy and Broadcom has ended. So, broadcom purged all of their sources for our device.
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ended ? Galaxy ace 3 ?
So shame galaxy grand is having unofficial cm11
What about us -_-
Mranggapo said:
What ended ? Galaxy ace 3 ?
So shame galaxy grand is having unofficial cm11
What about us -_-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, Galaxy Ace 3.
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
Love doesn't need any reason.